| Ukrainian: «План перемоги» (Plan peremohy) | |
|---|---|
| | |
| Type | Peace enforcement |
| Context | Russo-Ukrainian war |
| Drafted | October 16, 2024 |
| Condition |
|
| Amendment | 3 secret annexes (Points 2—4, partly) |
| Expiration | Not meant for signing [1] |
| Languages |
|
Five-point plan [2]
Unveiled at the Verkhovna Rada by Volodymyr Zelensky on 16 October 2024 [3] | |
In October 2024, Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy unveiled the Victory plan for Ukraine, [4] which includes the solution to the Russo-Ukrainian conflict and description of future national defense guarantees. [5] The official goal of the plan is "to change the circumstances in such a way that Russia will be forced to peace". [6]
The plan includes five points: one geopolitical, two military, one economical and one related to national defense and safety. [7] The second, third and fourth points of the plan have classified conditions included, that were introduced only to the political leaders of the US, Germany, France, United Kingdom and Italy. [8] [9]
In August 2025, Nik Hynek and Michal Šenk suggested the template for analysis of peace plans in interstate war with assessments of respective suggestions during ongoing Russo-Ukrainian war. Two right-most columns are added for the November 2025 two 28-point drafts.
| Criterion | Ukraine "Victory" Agenda | Russia Maximalist Design | U.S. Mediated Partition | Europe–Ukraine Counter‑Initiative [17] | China–Brazil "Friends of Peace" Plan | Istanbul Draft (2022 revival) | U.S.–Russia Draft Plan (2025) | European Proposal (2025) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enforcement mechanisms | Strong emphasis on Western guarantees [18] [19] | Minimal; relies on Russian dominance [20] | International monitors envisaged [21] | EU/NATO backing; sanctions leverage [22] [23] | Vague; multipolar rhetoric [24] | Weak; limited monitoring [25] | None specified; relies on bilateral recognition [26] [27] [28] | NATO-style guarantees from Western allies [29] [30] |
| Recovery & reconstruction | Western aid central [31] | Russia assumes control of occupied areas [32] | Partition with aid to both sides [33] | EU-led recovery funds [34] [35] | Development aid promised [36] | Limited; undefined [37] | Rebuild Ukraine using seized Russian funds [38] [39] | Western economic aid [40] [41] |
| Societal alignment | High domestic support for sovereignty [42] | Russian domestic narrative only [43] | Divisive; Ukrainians reject partition [44] | Strong Ukrainian civil society backing [45] | Low resonance in Ukraine [46] | Mixed; contested [47] | Mixed signals; neutrality imposed [48] [49] [50] | Strong Ukrainian public support [51] [52] |
| Security guarantees | NATO/EU integration [53] [54] | Neutrality enforced by Russia [55] | U.S./UN guarantees proposed [56] | NATO umbrella [57] [58] | Multipolar guarantees (China, Brazil) [59] | Neutrality clauses; weak guarantees [60] | Ukraine neutral; conditional U.S. guarantees [26] [61] [62] | NATO Article 5 mirror; robust guarantees [29] [63] |
| Territorial concessions | Rejects concessions [64] | Demands recognition of annexations [65] | Partition envisaged [66] | Rejects concessions [67] | Freeze lines; ambiguous [68] | Crimea/Donbas unresolved [69] | Recognizes Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk as Russian; freeze Kherson/Zaporizhzhia [38] [70] | Crimea remains under Russian control; Ukraine retains claim [29] [71] |
| Accountability / justice | War crimes prosecution central [72] | Russia absolved of responsibility [73] | Deferred accountability [74] | Strong emphasis on justice [75] | Downplayed [76] | Deferred [77] | Amnesty, prisoner exchange only [26] [78] [79] | War crimes trials, reparations [40] [80] |
| External mediation | Western allies [81] | Russia only [82] | U.S. broker [83] | EU role [84] [85] | China–Brazil mediation [86] | Turkey broker [87] | U.S.–Russia backchannel [48] [88] [89] | European-led diplomacy [29] [90] |
| Neutrality / alliances | Rejects neutrality [91] | Demands neutrality [92] | Neutral buffer envisaged [93] | NATO integration [94] [95] | Neutrality promoted [96] | Neutrality clause [97] | Ukraine constitutionally barred from NATO [26] [98] | Ukraine eventually joins NATO and the EU [51] [99] |
| Economic aid / incentives | Western aid packages [100] | Russian subsidies [101] | Aid split between entities [102] | EU recovery funds [103] [104] | Development aid promised [105] | Limited [106] | Frozen Russian assets diverted; U.S. profit share [38] [107] | Western weapons, aid [29] [108] |
| Durability / stability | High if backed by West [109] [110] | Low; coercive [111] | Fragile; partition unstable [112] | Stronger with EU/NATO support [113] [114] | Weak; lacks enforcement [115] | Fragile; draft abandoned [116] | Politically fragile; contradiction, vague wording [26] [117] [118] | High if Western support sustained [51] [119] |
Using our historically derived criteria, we analyse each plan with attention to future trajectories rather than day-to-day changes – though we do consider recent events, including the aftermath of the Trump–Putin meeting in Anchorage, Alaska in August 2025 – to ensure the paper's continued relevance as circumstances shift.