Walton v. Commissioner

Last updated
Walton v. Commissioner
Seal of the United States Tax Court.svg
Court United States Tax Court
Full case nameAudrey J. Walton v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
DecidedDecember 22, 2000 (2000-12-22)
Citation(s) 115 T.C. 589
Court membership
Judges sitting Arthur L. Nims, III, Thomas B. Wells, Herbert Chabot, Stephen Swift, Robert Ruwe, Laurence Whalen, John O. Colvin, James Halpern, Carolyn Chiechi, David Laro, Juan F. Vasquez, Joseph H. Gale, L. Paige Marvel
Case opinions
MajorityNims, joined by a unanimous court
Laws applied
Internal Revenue Code
Keywords

Walton v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 589 (2000), [1] a decision of the United States Tax Court in favor of taxpayer Audrey J. Walton, "ruled that a grantor's right to receive a fixed amount for a term of years, if that right is a qualified interest within the meaning of Section 2702(b), [2] is valued for gift tax purposes under Section 7520, [3] without regard to the life expectancy of the transferor." [4] More simply, a grantor's estate's contingent interest in a grantor-created annuity upon the grantor's death does not constitute a gift to anyone; but rather, is a retained interest of the grantor. [5]

Contents

Facts

Audrey J. Walton created two grantor retained annuity trusts (GRATs). [1] Each GRAT had a two-year duration during which Audrey retained the right to receive an annuity. [1] If Audrey died within the two-year period, the annuity payments would be received by her estate. [1] "The balance of the trust property would then be paid to the remainder beneficiaries." [1] Audrey's daughter, Ann Walton Kroenke was the beneficiary of one GRAT, and her other daughter, Nancy Walton Laurie, was the beneficiary of the other. [6]

The GRATs did not return the full annuity payments expected by Audrey (because Wal-Mart stock had underperformed expectations), so no property remained for the daughters (the remainder beneficiaries). [6] Audrey filed a gift-tax return (Form 709) valuing the GRATs as gifts of $0. [7] The IRS "issued a notice of deficiency," [7] asserting that the taxable value of each gift was $3.8 million. [7] Audrey admitted that a mistake was made, but claimed that each gift was worth only $6k. [7]

Issues

Holding

In calculating gift tax for the creation of a GRAT, the grantor's estate's contingent interest in the annuity payments upon the grantor's death should be considered a retained interest of the grantor, not as a gift to someone. The court sided with Audrey, but declined to make specific gift-tax calculations because timing disagreements remained that could best be dealt with through Rule 155 proceedings.

Reasoning

First the court noted that IRC § 2702 [2] provides a formula for gift valuation: "(Value of property transferred) - (value of any qualified interest retained by the grantor) = value of gift." [8] Then court reasoned that "[i]t is axiomatic that an individual cannot make a gift to himself or to his or her own estate." [8] Consequently, "by default [Audrey] retained all interests in the 2-year term annuities set forth in the trust documents," [9] even though the annuity payments would belong to her estate in the event she died within the two-year period.

Impact

This case has led to the proliferation of "Walton GRATs," which tax experts Beth D. Tractenberg & Michael J. Parets describe as GRATs that last "for a term of years, with the annuity payable to the grantor's estate if the grantor dies during the annuity term." [10] This allows the grantor to retain a qualified interest that is equal to the property transferred, resulting in a gift valuation of zero to the remainder-interest party[ies]. [10] The hope is that there will be an upswing in the market, allowing the remainder-interest party[ies] to take home excess returns (above the annuity returns to the grantor) without the imposition of a gift tax. [11]

See also

Related Research Articles

Trust law Three-party fiduciary relationship

A trust is a three-party fiduciary relationship in which the first party, the trustor or settlor, transfers ("settles") a property upon the second party for the benefit of the third party, the beneficiary.

Charitable trust

A charitable trust is an irrevocable trust established for charitable purposes and, in some jurisdictions, a more specific term than "charitable organization". A charitable trust enjoys a varying degree of tax benefits in most countries. It also generates good will. Some important terminology in charitable trusts is the term ‘corpus’ which refers to the assets with which the trust is funded and the term ‘donor’ which is the person donating assets to a charity.

In common law and statutory law, a life estate is the ownership of immovable property for the duration of a person's life. In legal terms, it is an estate in real property that ends at death when ownership of the property may revert to the original owner, or it may pass to another person. The owner of a life estate is called a "life tenant".

Universal life insurance is a type of cash value life insurance, sold primarily in the United States. Under the terms of the policy, the excess of premium payments above the current cost of insurance is credited to the cash value of the policy, which is credited each month with interest. The policy is debited each month by a cost of insurance (COI) charge as well as any other policy charges and fees drawn from the cash value, even if no premium payment is made that month. Interest credited to the account is determined by the insurer but has a contractual minimum rate. When an earnings rate is pegged to a financial index such as a stock, bond or other interest rate index, the policy is an "Indexed universal life" contract. Such policies offer the advantage of guaranteed level premiums throughout the insured's lifetime at a substantially lower premium cost than an equivalent whole life policy at first. The cost of insurance always increases, as is found on the cost index table. That not only allows for easy comparison of costs between carriers but also works well in irrevocable life insurance trusts (ILITs) since cash is of no consequence.

Estate planning

Estate planning is the process of anticipating and arranging, during a person's life, for the management and disposal of that person's estate during the person's life, in the event the person becomes incapacitated and after death. The planning includes the bequest of assets to heirs and may include minimizing gift, estate, generation skipping transfer, and taxes. Estate planning includes planning for incapacity as well as a process of reducing or eliminating uncertainties over the administration of a probate and maximizing the value of the estate by reducing taxes and other expenses. The ultimate goal of estate planning can only be determined by the specific goals of the estate owner and may be as simple or complex as the owner's wishes and needs directs. Guardians are often designated for minor children and beneficiaries in incapacity.

A gift tax is a tax imposed on the transfer of ownership of property during the giver's life. The United States Internal Revenue Service says that a gift is "Any transfer to an individual, either directly or indirectly, where full compensation is not received in return."

Asset-protection trust

An asset-protection trust is any form of trust which provides for funds to be held on a discretionary basis. Such trusts are set up in an attempt to avoid or mitigate the effects of taxation, divorce and bankruptcy on the beneficiary. Such trusts are therefore frequently proscribed or limited in their effects by governments and the courts.

Express trust

An express trust is a trust created "in express terms, and usually in writing, as distinguished from one inferred by the law from the conduct or dealings of the parties." Property is transferred by a person to a transferee, who holds the property for the benefit of one or more persons, called beneficiaries. The trustee may distribute the property, or the income from that property, to the beneficiaries. Express trusts are frequently used in common law jurisdictions as methods of wealth preservation or enhancement.

For households and individuals, gross income is the sum of all wages, salaries, profits, interest payments, rents, and other forms of earnings, before any deductions or taxes. It is opposed to net income, defined as the gross income minus taxes and other deductions.

Prior to 2006, a private annuity trust (PAT) was an arrangement to enable the value of highly appreciated assets, such as real estate, collectables or an investment portfolio, to be realized without directly selling them and incurring substantial taxes from their sale.

A structured sale or structured installment sale, is a special type of installment sale pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code. In an installment sale, the seller defers recognition of gain on the sale of a business or real estate to the tax year in which the related sale proceeds are received. In a structured sale, the seller is able to pay U.S. Federal income tax over time while having the seller's right to receive those payments guaranteed by a high credit quality alternate obligor. This obligor assumes the buyer's periodic payment obligation. Transactions can be arranged for amounts as small as $100,000.

An inheritance tax is a tax paid by a person who inherits money or property of a person who has died, whereas an estate tax is a levy on the estate of a person who has died.

Irwin v. Gavit, 268 U.S. 161 (1925), was a case before the U.S. Supreme Court regarding the taxability, under United States tax law, of a divided interest in a bequest. It is notable for the following holding:

A structured settlement factoring transaction means a transfer of structured settlement payment rights made for consideration by means of sale, assignment, pledge, or other form of encumbrance or alienation for consideration. In order for such transfer to be approved, the transfer must comply with Internal Revenue Code section 5891 and any applicable state structured settlement protection law.

A life annuity is an annuity, or series of payments at fixed intervals, paid while the purchaser is alive. A life annuity is an insurance product typically sold or issued by life insurance companies.

Residence trusts in the United States are used to transfer a grantor's residence out of the grantor's estate at a low gift tax value. Once the trust is funded with the grantor's residence, the residence and any future appreciation of the residence are excluded from the grantor's estate, if the grantor survives the term of the trust, as explained below.

United States trust law Law regulating a wealth-holding legal instrument

United States trust law is the body of law regulating the legal instrument for holding wealth known as a trust.

A charitable remainder unitrust is an irrevocable trust created under the authority of Internal Revenue Code § 664 ("Code"). This special, irrevocable trust has two primary characteristics: (1) Once established, the CRUT distributes a fixed percentage of the value of its assets to a non-charitable beneficiary ; and (2) At the expiration of a specified time, the remaining balance of the CRUTs assets are distributed to charity. The trustee determines the fair market value of the CRUT's assets at the time of contribution, and thereafter on the applicable valuation date. The fixed annuity percentage must be at least 5% and no more than 50% of the fair market value of the assets in the corpus. The remainder must be at least 10% of the fair market value of the assets contributed to the CRUT. Code Section 664(d)(1) sets the federal income tax requirements for a charitable remainder unitrust.

A grantor-retained annuity trust, is a financial instrument commonly used in the United States to make large financial gifts to family members without paying a U.S. gift tax.

The Institute of Business and Finance (IBF) is a financial training institute providing online financial and educational materials, certification programs and support to the financial community and general public.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 Walton v. Commissioner, 115T.C.589 (T.C.2000).
  2. 1 2 26 U.S.C.   § 2702
  3. 26 U.S.C.   § 7520
  4. Carlyn S. McCaffrey, Lloyd Leva Plaine, & Pam H. Schneider, The Aftermath of Walton: The Rehabilitation of the Fixed-term, Zeroed-out GRAT, Journal of Taxation (Dec. 2001) (internal footnote omitted).
  5. Walton v. Commissioner, 115T.C.589 , 595(T.C.2000)("It is axiomatic that an individual cannot make a gift to himself or to his or her own estate.").
  6. 1 2 Walton v. Commissioner, 115T.C.589 , 591(T.C.2000).
  7. 1 2 3 4 Walton v. Commissioner, 115T.C.589 , 592(T.C.2000).
  8. 1 2 Walton v. Commissioner, 115T.C.589 , 595(T.C.2000).
  9. Walton v. Commissioner, 115T.C.589 , 596(T.C.2000).
  10. 1 2 Beth D. Tractenberg & Michael J. Parets,Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts vs. Intentionally Defective Grantor Trusts, Practising Law Institute (2006), at 763.
  11. Beth D. Tractenberg & Michael J. Parets,Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts vs. Intentionally Defective Grantor Trusts, Practising Law Institute (2006), at 766.

Text of Walton v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 589 (2000) is available from:   Google Scholar    Leagle    United States Tax Court