Wikipedia @ 20

Last updated

Wikipedia @ 20
Wikipedia @ 20 cover graphic 300x448.jpg
Wikipedia @ 20 cover graphic
Editors
LanguageEnglish
Publisher MIT Press
Publication date
2020
ISBN 978-0-262-53817-6
OCLC 1187209148

Wikipedia @ 20 is a book of essays about Wikipedia published by the MIT Press in late 2020, marking 20 years since the creation of Wikipedia. It was edited by academic and author Joseph M. Reagle Jr. and social researcher Jackie Koerner. Contributions came from 34 other Wikipedians, Wikimedians, academics, researchers, journalists, librarians, artists and others, reflecting on particular histories and future themes in Wikipedia discussions. [1] [2]

Contents

Background

The title "Wikipedia @ 20" has a distinct style used in 2021 around celebration of Wikipedia's birthday, and the subtitle paraphrases the closing remarks of the preface:

Though Wikipedia was revolutionary twenty years ago, it has yet to become the revolution we need. The important work of sharing knowledge, connecting people, and bridging cultures continues.

Joseph Reagle and Jackie Koerner, Preface

The book features an introduction by the editors and 21 essays split into three chapters: Hindsight, Connection, and Vision. Essays were selected through an open submission process in the spirit of Wikipedia and published using open publishing platform PubPub. [2] [3]

The project was financially supported by Knowledge Unlatched, the Northeastern University Communication Studies Department, and the Wikimedia Foundation so the book could be released in both print and free-to-download digital forms. [4]

Synopsis

The book contains the following essays:

Contents [4]
SectionEssay titleContributor(s)
Preface Joseph Reagle and Jackie Koerner
Introduction: Connections
HindsightThe Many (Reported) Deaths of WikipediaJoseph Reagle
From Anarchy to Wikiality, Glaring Bias to Good Cop: Press Coverage of Wikipedia’s First Two DecadesOmer Benjakob and Stephen Harrison
From Utopia to Practice and Back Yochai Benkler
An Encyclopedia with Breaking NewsBrian Keegan
Paid with Interest: COI Editing and Its DiscontentsWilliam Beutler
ConnectionWikipedia and Libraries Phoebe Ayers
Three Links: Be Bold, Assume Good Faith, and There Are No Firm RulesRebecca Thorndike-Breeze, Cecelia A. Musselman, and Amy Carleton
How Wikipedia Drove Professors Crazy, Made Me Sane, and Almost Saved the InternetJake Orlowitz
The First Twenty Years of Teaching with Wikipedia: From Faculty Enemy to Faculty EnablerRobert Cummings
Wikipedia as a Role-Playing Game, or Why Some Academics Do Not Like Wikipedia Dariusz Jemielniak
The Most Important Laboratory for Social Scientific and Computing Research in History Benjamin Mako Hill and Aaron Shaw
Collaborating on the Sum of All Knowledge Across Languages Denny Vrandečić
Rise of the UnderdogHeather Ford
VisionWhy Do I Have Authority to Edit the Page? The Politics of User Agency and Participation on WikipediaAlexandria Lockett
What We Talk About When We Talk About Community Siân Evans, Jacqueline Mabey, Michael Mandiberg, and Melissa Tamani
Toward a Wikipedia For and From Us AllAdele Godoy Vrana, Anasuya Sengupta, and Siko Bouterse
The Myth of the Comprehensive Historical Archive Jina Valentine, Eliza Myrie, and Heather Hart
No Internet, No ProblemStephane Coillet-Matillon
Possible Enlightenments: Wikipedia’s Encyclopedic Promise and Epistemological FailureMatthew A. Vetter
Equity, Policy, and Newcomers: Five Journeys from Wiki EducationIan A. Ramjohn and LiAnna L. Davis
Wikipedia Has a Bias ProblemJackie Koerner
Capstone: Making History, Building the Future Together Katherine Maher

Reception

The publication was launched during a live stream with an author's round table on Wikipedia Weekly Network on the 20th birthday of Wikipedia, and it was referenced in international media coverage of the 20th anniversary. [5] [6] The book was endorsed by Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales for its "hard-won wisdom of its contributors, the novel reflections of scholars, and the necessary provocations of those working to shape its next twenty years." [1] It was also reviewed critically by Science magazine's Andrew Robinson [7] and furthermore in Bookforum by Rebecca Panovka who reflected on some of its inconsistencies, ties to "Enlightenment-era liberalism," and lack of voices of less loyal external criticism. [8]

Other mainstream media that referenced the book include The New Yorker , [9] The New Republic [10] and ABC Radio National, [11] as well as technology focused websites. [12] [13] The book is featured in IEEE Xplore, [14] and some of the content of the book was adapted for shorter form publishing, such as a Slate article on how the September 11 attacks shaped Wikipedia. [15]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of Wikipedia</span>

Wikipedia, a free-content online encyclopedia written and maintained by a community of volunteers known as Wikipedians, began with its first edit on 15 January 2001, two days after the domain was registered. It grew out of Nupedia, a more structured free encyclopedia, as a way to allow easier and faster drafting of articles and translations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">MeatballWiki</span> Wiki dedicated to online communities

MeatballWiki is a wiki dedicated to online communities, network culture, and hypermedia. Containing a record of experience on running wikis, it is intended for "discussion about wiki philosophy, wiki culture, instructions and observations."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers</span> American professional association

The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) is an American 501(c)(3) professional association for electrical engineering, electronics engineering, and other related disciplines.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wikinews</span> Free-content news wiki; project of the Wikimedia Foundation

Wikinews is a free-content news wiki and a project of the Wikimedia Foundation that works through collaborative journalism. Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales has distinguished Wikinews from Wikipedia by saying, "On Wikinews, each story is to be written as a news story as opposed to an encyclopedia article." Wikinews's neutral point of view policy aims to distinguish it from other citizen journalism efforts such as Indymedia and OhmyNews. In contrast to most Wikimedia Foundation projects, Wikinews allows original work in the form of original reporting and interviews. In contrast to newspapers, Wikinews does not permit op-ed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wikimedia movement</span> Group of global contributors to Wikimedia projects

The Wikimedia movement is the global community of contributors to the Wikimedia projects, including Wikipedia. This community directly builds and administers these projects with the commitment of achieving this using open standards and software.

"Ignore all rules" (IAR) is a policy used on Wikipedia, an online encyclopedia. The English Wikipedia policy reads: "If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it." [emphasis in original]. The rule was proposed by Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger to encourage editors to add information without focusing excessively on formatting, though Sanger later criticized the rule's effects on the community.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wikimania</span> Annual conference of the Wikimedia movement

Wikimania is the Wikimedia movement's annual conference, organized by volunteers and hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation. Topics of presentations and discussions include Wikimedia projects such as Wikipedia, other wikis, open-source software, free knowledge and free content, and social and technical aspects related to these topics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Larry Sanger</span> American Internet project developer and Wikipedia co-founder

Lawrence Mark Sanger is an American Internet project developer and philosopher who co-founded Wikipedia along with Jimmy Wales. Sanger coined Wikipedia's name, and provided initial drafts for many of its early guidelines, including the "Neutral point of view" and "Ignore all rules" policies. Prior to Wikipedia, he was the editor-in-chief of Nupedia, another online encyclopedia. He later worked on other encyclopedic projects, including Encyclopedia of Earth, Citizendium, and Everipedia, and advised the nonprofit American political encyclopedia Ballotpedia.

<i>Good Faith Collaboration</i> 2010 book by Joseph Michael Reagle

Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia is a 2010 book by Joseph M. Reagle Jr. that deals with the topic of Wikipedia and the Wikipedia community. The book was first published on August 27, 2010, through the MIT Press and has a foreword by Lawrence Lessig. The book is an ethnographic study of the history of Wikipedia, its real life and theoretical precursors, and its culture including its consensus and collaborative practices.

This is a list of books about Wikipedia or for which Wikipedia is a major subject.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joseph M. Reagle Jr.</span> American academic and writer (born 1972)

Joseph Michael Reagle Jr. is an American academic and writer focused on digital technology and culture, including Wikipedia, online comments, geek feminism, and life hacking. He is an associate professor of communication studies at Northeastern University. He was an early member of the World Wide Web Consortium, based at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and in 1998 and 2010 he was a fellow at Harvard University's Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Outline of Wikipedia</span> Overview and topical guide to the free online crowdsourced encyclopedia

The following outline is provided as an overview of and a topical guide to Wikipedia:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gender bias on Wikipedia</span> Gender gap problem in Wikipedia and Wikimedia projects

Gender bias on Wikipedia includes various gender-related disparities on Wikipedia, particularly the overrepresentation of men among both volunteer contributors and article subjects, as well as lesser coverage of and topics primarily of interest to women.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Racial bias on Wikipedia</span> Bias on Wikipedia

The English Wikipedia has been criticized for having a systemic racial bias in its coverage. This bias partially stems from an under-representation of people of color within its volunteer editor base. In "Can History Be Open Source? Wikipedia and the Future of the Past," it is noted that article completeness and coverage is dependent on the interests of Wikipedians, not necessarily on the subject matter itself. The past president of Wikimedia D.C., James Hare, asserted that "a lot of [Black American history] is left out" of Wikipedia, due to articles predominately being written by white editors. Articles about African topics that do exist are, according to some, largely edited by editors from Europe and North America and thus, they only reflect their knowledge and their consumption of media, which "tend to perpetuate a negative image" of Africa. Maira Liriano of the Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture has argued that the lack of information regarding Black history on Wikipedia "makes it seem like it's not important."

<i>The Signpost</i> English Wikipedias newspaper

The Signpost is the English Wikipedia's online newspaper. Managed by the volunteer community, it is published online with contributions from Wikimedia editors. The newspaper's scope includes the Wikimedia community and events related to Wikipedia, including Arbitration Committee rulings, Wikimedia Foundation issues, and other Wikipedia-related projects. It was founded in January 2005 by Wikipedian Michael Snow, who continued as a contributor until his February 2008 appointment to the Wikimedia Foundation's Board of Trustees.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Predictions of the end of Wikipedia</span> Theories that Wikipedia will break down or become obsolete

Various observers have predicted the end of Wikipedia since it rose to prominence, with potential pitfalls from lack of quality-control or inconsistencies among contributors.

In Wikipedia and similar wikis, an edit count is a record of the number of edits performed by a certain editor, or by all editors on a particular page. An edit, in this context, is an individually recorded change to the content of a page. Within Wikimedia projects, a number of tools exist to determine and compare edit counts, resulting in their usage for various purposes, with both positive and negative effects.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Denny Vrandečić</span> Croatian computer scientist (born 1978)

Zdenko "Denny" Vrandečić is a Croatian computer scientist. He was a co-developer of Semantic MediaWiki and Wikidata, the lead developer of the Wikifunctions project, and an employee of the Wikimedia Foundation as a Head of Special Projects, Structured Content. He published modules for the German role-playing game The Dark Eye.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jason Moore (Wikipedia editor)</span> American Wikipedia editor (born 1984/1985)

Jason Moore is an American Wikipedia editor among the English Wikipedia's most active contributors by edit count. Editing since 2007 as "Another Believer", he has specialized in current events, with coverage including the COVID-19 pandemic, George Floyd protests, and the culture of Portland, Oregon, where he is based. On Wikipedia, Moore has created and developed editor affinity groups for joint work on these topics. As an organizer in the Wikimedia movement, Moore has hosted meet-ups and edit-a-thons to train new editors.

References

  1. 1 2 Reagle, Joseph; Koerner, Jackie, eds. (October 13, 2020). Wikipedia @ 20. Cambridge: MIT Press. ISBN   978-0-262-53817-6.
  2. 1 2 Hockx-Yu, Helen (June 2, 2021). "Wikipedia @ 20, stories of an incomplete revolution". Internet Histories: 1–6. doi:10.1080/24701475.2021.1932273. ISSN   2470-1475. S2CID   236270873 via Taylor & Francis.
  3. Reagle, Joseph; Koerner, Jackie. "Wikipedia @ 20". Joseph Reagle. Retrieved November 14, 2021.
  4. 1 2 Reagle, Joseph; Koerner, Jackie (October 15, 2020). Wikipedia @ 20. Cambridge: MIT Press. ISBN   978-0-262-53817-6 via PubPub.
  5. Spieseke, Marc (January 15, 2021). "Wikipedia wird 20 – Happy Birthday, freies Wissen! – biblioblog". Free University of Berlin (in German). Retrieved November 14, 2021.
  6. Pejić, Ivana (January 15, 2021). "Esencijalna infrastruktura za slobodno znanje". Kulturpunkt (in Bosnian). Retrieved November 14, 2021.
  7. Robinson, Andrew (November 2, 2020). Thompson, Valerie (ed.). "Scholars reflect on Wikipedia's 20 years of crowdsourced knowledge". Books, Et Al. Science. Archived from the original on November 3, 2020. Retrieved November 12, 2021.
  8. Panovka, Rebecca. "No Rest for the Wiki". Bookforum . Retrieved November 14, 2021.
  9. Menand, Louis (November 16, 2020). "Wikipedia, "Jeopardy!," and the Fate of the Fact". The New Yorker . ISSN   0028-792X. OCLC   320541675 . Retrieved November 16, 2021.
  10. Sachdev, Shaan (February 26, 2021). "Wikipedia's Sprawling, Awe-Inspiring Coverage of the Pandemic". The New Republic . ISSN   2169-2416 . Retrieved November 16, 2021.
  11. Doogue, Geraldine (March 13, 2021). "Wikipedia turns 20". ABC Radio National . Retrieved November 16, 2021.
  12. Dormehl, Luke (February 1, 2020). "How Wikimedia controls the chaos of constant contributions to create Wikipedia". Digital Trends . OCLC   810203593 . Retrieved November 16, 2021.
  13. Gossett, Stephen (October 13, 2020). "The Internet Should Be More Like Wikipedia". Built In. Retrieved November 16, 2021.
  14. "Wikipedia @ 20: Stories of an Incomplete Revolution". IEEE Xplore . IEEE . Retrieved November 14, 2021.
  15. Keegan, Brian (November 17, 2020). "How 9/11 Made Wikipedia What It Is Today". Slate . Retrieved November 16, 2021.