William Spiggot

Last updated

William Spiggot/Spigget
Born1691 or 1692
Hereford, Herefordshire, England
Died11 February 1721 (age 29)
Tyburn Tree Gallows, Middlesex, London, England
NationalityEnglish
Occupation(s)apprentice to a cabinet-maker or joyner, highwayman, thief, convict
Known forHighway robbery, leader of a gang, his refusal to plead which led to his being pressed (peine forte et dure) and his execution at Tyburn

William Spiggot (also spelled Spigget) was a highwayman who was captured by Jonathan Wild's men in 1721. During his trial at the Old Bailey, [1] he at first refused to plead and was therefore sentenced to be pressed until he pleaded. [2] This was called Peine forte et dure . He was later executed, after a second trial when he pleaded not guilty, on 11 February 1721 at Tyburn, London. [3] [4]

Contents

Biography

William Spiggot or Spigget was born in Hereford, England. His father was an innkeeper (or ostler in the English of the time) at the Chief Inn. He was married (probably at 19 years old) and he had three children. He declared that he was an apprentice to a cabinet-maker or joiner in Hereford. He is best known for his criminal life as a highwayman. [4]

Illustration of a Highwayman Highwayman.jpg
Illustration of a Highwayman

Criminal Life

For about seven to twelve years, [4] William Spiggot was a highwayman and the leader of a gang of at least eight men. [5] He performed his robberies on the roads from London to Hounslow Heath, Kingston and Ware. [3] The exact number of his crimes is unknown, yet according to the Ordinary of Newgate, Spiggot had declared to him that "it was in vain to mention his numerous Robberies on the High-Way, being perhaps about a Hundred". [4]

His criminal life came to an end when he was arrested along with other members of his gang in January 1721, in a tavern at Westminster by the men of the famous thief-taker Jonathan Wild. [3] John Merrit, who apprehended Spiggot and his gang, claimed that the actual arrest was of a violent sort. Spiggot was described as very reluctant on being taken and fought back, eventually shooting his landlord, Mr Rowlet, in the shoulder. According to another witness, Spiggot swore on his arrest that "he would kill a thousand before he would be taken". [2]

First Trial and Refusal to Plead

The punishment peine forte et dure for a refusal to plead in London. Engraving published in the 1780 edition of the Malefactor's Register or Newgate Calendar Engraving for the Malefactor's Register the punishment formerly inflicted on those who refused pleading to an indictment.jpg
The punishment peine forte et dure for a refusal to plead in London. Engraving published in the 1780 edition of the Malefactor's Register or Newgate Calendar

During the 13 January 1721 session at the Old Bailey Court, William Spiggot and Thomas Phillips (alias Cross) were judged for highway robberies and violent thefts. But as they were brought to the bar, they refused to plead. They declared that until their belongings, money and horses were given back to them, they would remain silent. The court reminded them of William and Mary's 1692 act titled "An Act for encourageing the apprehending of Highway Men". [6] Part IV of this act stipulates clearly that when highwaymen are arrested, the apprehender can take the horses, money and other belongings from the felon. [7] Still they both refused to speak. At the time, a refusal to plead would lead to a heavy judgement also called Peine forte et dure , which is to be pressed with heavy weights either until death or until one would speak. [8] The judge threatened them, describing how the sentence should be carried out. The atrocity of the sentence was thought to dissuade felons from non pleading and that they would submit themselves to a trial by a jury. But still, the convicts stayed mute. [2] [9]

They were brought back to Newgate Prison to receive their sentence. On their arrival in the Press (the room where the heavy judgment should be carried out), Thomas Phillips asked to be brought back to court in order to plead. On the other hand, Spiggot endured the Press. His legs and arms were kept outstreched by cords, while he laid almost naked on the floor. Some 350 pounds (about 160 kg) of iron were put on his breast. Apart for groans and "pray for me!", Spiggot kept silent. He had just a cloth covering his face but he also complained about a heavy weight on his head; according to the Ordinary of Newgate [10] Thomas Purney, [11] this was due to the blood pressure as the blood was "flush'd and forc'd up into his face". After half an hour, 50 pounds (about 23 kg) were added on his chest. The excruciating pain made the weak prisoner accept to be brought back to court in order to plead not guilty. [2] [4] [12]

Second Trial

Brought back to court, Spiggot and Phillips pleaded not guilty on their new trial. They were accused of assaulting John Watkins on the Highway on 12 November 1720 and robbing him "a Silver Watch, a Holland Gown, a pair of Stays, a Scarlet Riding-Hood lined with Silk, with divers other Goods, and 5 l. in Money, in all to the value of 200 l". They were also convicted with one of their associates, William Heater, for another highway robbery, attacking John Turner on 1 November 1720 and stealing " [his]5 Guineas [...] and 1 Box, a Gold Watch, 12 Holland Shirts, 2 pair of Lace Ruffles, 2 Cambrick Bosoms. 2 Lawn, Turnovers, 2 Muslin Turnovers, 2 pair of Stockings, a Hat, a Perriwig, &c. and 12 Guineas, the Goods and Money of Neal Sheldon, Esq". [2]

When he testified, John Watkins declared that he recognized Spiggot, knowing him for some years. On the contrary, the gang that attacked John Turner were on horseback and wore masks. The testimonies suggested that some of Turner's stolen goods were found at Spiggot's lodgings. Among the witnesses, six people described Spiggot's gang's violent arrest. They made him appear as a very impetuous man, not eager to surrender and who was difficult to catch. Even one of his former accomplices, Joseph Lindsey, testified against him. [2]

Heater was described as the man in charge of renting horses and receiving the stolen goods. Even Spiggot and Phillips declared that he was innocent. This declarations and the lack of proofs found against him made the jury acquit Heater. [2]

The proceedings [13] do not recollect any defence from the prisoners. The jury found Spiggot and Phillips guilty and they were sentenced to death. [2]

Third Trial

On the same session of 13 January 1721, Spiggot was cited in the next trial along with another prisoner William Bourroughs of Finchley. They were indicted for highway robbery. Charles Sybbald prosecuted them for assaulting him on the Highway near Finchley Common on 25 August 1720. According to the victim, they stole "15 Guineas and 10 Shillings in Money". Again the accomplice of Spiggot, Joseph Lindsey testified against him. Lindsey clearly declared that he participated in the attack of Sybbald and his man. The three armed robbers were on horseback. However, Sybbald recognized only Lindsey having seen his face and heard his voice during the assault. The two other attackers had indeed covered up their faces. Burroughs' brother also testified during the trial. He claimed that Lindsey's wife told him that his brother and her husband left together for the country. Burroughs' brother explained that he took William home to their mother, where he was guarded by other men. The jury found them guilty and they were sentenced to death. [14]

Execution

Executions at Tyburn (late seventeenth century) The Manner of Execution at Tyburn.jpg
Executions at Tyburn (late seventeenth century)

Found guilty by the jury at his trials on 13 January 1721, Spiggot was sentenced to death along with his partner in crime Thomas Cross alias Phillips. The Ordinary of Newgate recorded that William Spiggot attended to the prayers before his execution thus being "truly penitent", contrary to his associate Cross who would disturb them. He also recalled that Spiggot did not easily weep, and when he wished his son farewell for the last time might have been the only moment that Purney saw Spiggot crying. The condemned man was furious at his former accomplice Joseph Lindsey, who had betrayed him by testifying at his trial. The convicted robber declared that he once had helped his former accomplice escape and that he had protected him and had saved his life. [4] [12]

Spiggot and Phillips were both executed on 11 February 1721 at Tyburn, with five other convicts. [4] The crowd carried off Spiggot's body in order to prevent surgeons dissecting it. As suggested by Hitchcock and Shoemaker, it is probable that people were impressed by his bravery as he suffered the press ordeal and therefore protected his corpse. [3]

Interpretations of his Refusal to Plead

A refusal to plead led to such a harsh punishment, "a torture" according to Newgate's Ordinary, that people always wondered why Spiggot kept obstinate. The Chaplain already considered in his accounts of February 1721 the reasons of Spiggot's stubbornness. Thomas Purney affirmed that Spiggot's main motive was to secure his family so that they would not suffer from his trial, on a social and financial level. Then, Purney maintained that since Spiggot was angry at Lindsey, his ex-accomplice who testified against him during several trials, he would not want the person who betrayed him to be delighted by his downfall. [4] However, the historians Shoemaker and Hitchcock, these two reasons were not convincing as a complete justification. [3]

For them, the proof resides in the account opening sermon, where the Ordinate condemned misused virility and pride qualifying them of being "false courage". The two felons, Spiggot and Phillips bragged about their numerous extravagant crimes. [4] The historian Andrea McKenzie suggests that obtaining a fame as highwayman could have been one of Spiggot's reason. The "criminal celebrities" were populars among the people, who would visit the famous criminals in prison or gather in huge crowds to watch an execution. Published works related the depravity of prisoners of the time, for instance Spiggot and his stubbornness were cited the Newgate Calendar or The Lives of the Most Remarkable Criminals . [3] [9] [12] [15] [16]

The question of challenging justice in England is also raised. Even if Spiggot's intentions were not to challenge the legal system, it was interpreted by modern historians as confronting its authority. For instance, in her article about the Peine forte et dure, Andrea McKenzie argues that such refusals showed a "persistent popular resistance to that most sacred of English institutions, trial by jury". In an 18th-century trial, the balance was on the side of the prosecutor. Being judged by neighbours, with friends and relations testifying for and against them, prisoners had a few chances to be found innocent. Maybe knowing that his trial would certainly be his downfall considering the violence of his crimes, Spiggot refused to plead and to have a trial by a jury. [9]

Furthermore, his reason could also be financial. As explained by McKenzie, the unsanitary London prisons were very expensive. To secure a private cell or better conditions, a prisoner had to pay for it. Requesting to be given back the money that was taken on his arrest, Spiggot probably wanted to secure better living conditions in Newgate. [9]

See also

Articles on Wikipedia

Bibliography

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

Related Research Articles

Peine forte et dure was a method of torture formerly used in the common law legal system, in which a defendant who refused to plead would be subjected to having heavier and heavier stones placed upon their chest until a plea was entered, or death resulted.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tyburn</span> Former manor in Middlesex, England

Tyburn was a manor (estate) in London, Middlesex, England, one of two which were served by the parish of Marylebone. Tyburn took its name from the Tyburn Brook, a tributary of the River Westbourne. The name Tyburn, from Teo Bourne, means 'boundary stream'.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Newgate Prison</span> Former prison in London

Newgate Prison was a prison at the corner of Newgate Street and Old Bailey Street just inside the City of London, England, originally at the site of Newgate, a gate in the Roman London Wall. Built in the 12th century and demolished in 1904, the prison was extended and rebuilt many times, and remained in use for over 700 years, from 1188 to 1902.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dick Turpin</span> English highwayman (1705–1739)

Richard Turpin was an English highwayman whose exploits were romanticised following his execution in York for horse theft. Turpin may have followed his father's trade as a butcher early in his life but, by the early 1730s, he had joined a gang of deer thieves and, later, became a poacher, burglar, horse thief, and killer. He is also known for a fictional 200-mile (320 km) overnight ride from London to York on his horse Black Bess, a story that was made famous by the Victorian novelist William Harrison Ainsworth almost 100 years after Turpin's death.

Death by crushing or pressing is a method of execution that has a history during which the techniques used varied greatly from place to place, generally involving placing heavy weights upon a person with the intent to kill.

Molly house or molly-house was a term used in 18th- and 19th-century Britain for a meeting place for homosexual men and gender-nonconforming people. The meeting places were generally taverns, public houses, coffeehouses or even private rooms where patrons could either socialise or meet possible sexual partners.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bounty (reward)</span> Payment or reward

A bounty is a payment or reward of money to locate, capture or kill an outlaw or a wanted person. Two modern examples of bounties are the ones placed for the capture of Saddam Hussein and his sons by the United States government and Microsoft's bounty for computer virus creators. Those who make a living by pursuing bounties are known as bounty hunters.

James Dalton was "captain" of a street robbery gang in 18th-century London, England.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joseph Blake (criminal)</span> 18th century English criminal

Joseph "Blueskin" Blake was an 18th-century English highwayman and prison escapee.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Rann</span>

John Rann was an English criminal and highwayman during the mid-18th century. He was a prominent and colourful local figure renowned for his wit and charm. He came to be known as "Sixteen String Jack" after receiving silk breeches, laced with eight strings on each leg, as a gift from his employer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">James MacLaine</span> British highwayman

"Captain" James Maclaine was an Irish man of a respectable presbyterian family who had a brief but notorious career as a mounted highwayman in London with his accomplice William Plunkett. He was known as "The Gentleman Highwayman" as a result of his courteous behaviour during his robberies, and obtained a certain kind of celebrity. Notoriously, he held up and robbed Horace Walpole at gunpoint: eventually he was hanged at Tyburn.

William Plunkett was a highwayman and accomplice of the famed "Gentleman Highwayman", James MacLaine.

The Hawkhurst Gang was a notorious criminal organisation involved in smuggling throughout southeast England from 1735 until 1749. One of the more infamous gangs of the early 18th century, they extended their influence from Hawkhurst, their base in Kent, along the South coast, where they successfully raided the Custom House, Poole. After they were defeated in a battle with the Goudhurst militia in 1747, two of their leaders, Arthur Gray and Thomas Kingsmill, were executed in 1748 and 1749, respectively.

Henry Simms, known as Young Gentlemen Harry, was a thief and highwayman in 18th-century England who was transported to Maryland for theft, but escaped and returned to England, where he was eventually executed for highway robbery.

Bosavern Penlez (1726–1749) was a British wig maker who was convicted and executed for rioting along with co-defendant John Wilson. He was sentenced to death and thus hanged on 18 October 1749.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thief-taker</span> Private individual hired to capture criminals

In English legal history, a thief-taker was a private individual hired to capture criminals. The widespread establishment of professional police in England did not occur until the 19th century. With the rising crime rate and newspapers to bring this to the attention of the public, thief-takers arose to partially fill the void in bringing criminals to justice. These were private individuals much like bounty hunters. However, thief-takers were usually hired by crime victims, while bounty hunters were paid by bail bondsmen to catch fugitives who skipped their court appearances and hence forfeited their bail. Both types also collected bounties offered by the authorities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sarah Malcolm</span>

Sarah Malcolm was a British murderer who was sketched by William Hogarth as she awaited execution for a triple murder charge.

<i>Second Thoughts Are Best</i>

Second Thoughts Are Best: or, a Further Improvement of a Late Scheme to Prevent Street Robberies is a 1729 pamphlet by Daniel Defoe. He wrote it under the name of Andrew Moreton Esq., presented as a dissatisfied middle-class old man who was extremely concerned about the increase in criminality around the 1720s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ordinary of Newgate's Account</span>

The Ordinary of Newgate's Account was a sister publication of the Old Bailey's Proceedings, regularly published from 1676 to 1772 and containing biographies and last dying speeches of the prisoners executed at Tyburn during that period. The Accounts were written by the chaplain of Newgate Prison, recounting the statements made by the condemned during confession. Over 400 editions were published, containing biographies of some 2,500 executed criminals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thomas Kingsmill (Hawkhurst Gang)</span> English outlaw

Thomas Kingsmill was an English outlaw and one of the leaders of the notorious Hawkhurst Gang of smugglers that operated, from its base in Kent, along the South Coast of England from 1735 until 1749. One of the more infamous gangs of the early 18th century, they extended their influence from Hawkhurst, their base in Kent, along vast swathes of the South coast.

References

  1. ↑ Hitchcock, Tim; Shoemaker, Robert; Emsley, Clive; Howard, Sharon; McLaughlin, Jamie (24 March 2012). "The Old Bailey Proceedings Online, 1674-1913". The Old Bailey Proceedings Online, 1674-1913. version 7.0. Retrieved 21 October 2015.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 "January 1721, trial of William Spigget alias Spiggot Thomas Phillips alias Cross William Heater (t17210113-43)". Old Bailey Proceedings Online. 7.2. Retrieved 31 October 2015.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Hitchcock, Tim; Shoemaker, Robert (2010). Tales from the Hanging Court. London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 174, 178. ISBN   9780340913758.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 "Ordinary of Newgate's Account, February 1721 (OA17210208)". Old Bailey Proceedings Online. 7.2. Retrieved 12 November 2015.
  5. ↑ Howson, Gerald (1985). Thief-Taker General Jonathan Wilde and the Emergence of Crime and Corruption as a Way of Life in Eighteenth-Century England. New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA: Transaction Books. p. 313. ISBN   0887380328.
  6. ↑ "William and Mary, 1692: An Act for encourageing the apprehending of Highway Men [Chapter VIII Rot. Parl. pt. 3. nu. 3.] - British History Online".
  7. ↑ "'William and Mary, 1692: An Act for encourageing the apprehending of Highway Men [Chapter VIII Rot. Parl. pt. 3. nu. 3.]', in Statutes of the Realm: Volume 6, 1685-94, ed. John Raithby (s.l, 1819), pp. 390-391". British History Online. Retrieved 30 October 2015.
  8. ↑ Emsley, Clive; Hitchcock, Tim; Shoemaker, Robert. "Crime and Justice - Trial Procedures". Old Bailey Proceedings Online. 7.0. Retrieved 31 October 2015.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 McKenzie, Andrea (2005). ""This Death Some Strong and Stout Hearted Man Doth Choose": The Practice of Peine Forte et Dure in Seventeenth- and Eighteenth-Century England". Law and History Review. 23 (2): 279–313. doi:10.1017/S0738248000000304. JSTOR   30042870. S2CID   144972333.
  10. ↑ "The Proceedings - Ordinary of Newgate's Accounts - Central Criminal Court".
  11. ↑ Radcliffe, David HIll. "Rev. Thomas Purney (1695-1727 ca.)".
  12. 1 2 3 McKenzie, Andrea (2007). Tyburn's Martyrs, Executions in England 1675-1775. London, England: Hambledon Continuum, Continuum Books. pp. 108, 173, 193, 199, 243, 249. ISBN   978-1847251718.
  13. ↑ "The Proceedings - Publishing History of the Proceedings - Central Criminal Court".
  14. ↑ Old Bailey Proceedings Online (accessed 31 October 2015), Trial of William Spigget alias Spiggot, William Bourroughs . (t17210113-44, 13 January 1721).
  15. ↑ "Lives of the most remarkable criminals who have been condemned and executed for murder, highway robberies, house-breaking, street robberies, coining, or other offences; from the year 1720 to the year 1735, Collected from original papers and authentic memoirs". The Internet Archive. 1874. Retrieved 12 November 2015.
  16. ↑ Pelham (Esq), Camden (1887). "The chronicles of crime; or, The new Newgate calendar, being a series of memoirs and anecdotes of notorious characters who have outraged the laws of Great Britain from the earliest period to 1841". The Internet Archive. pp. 27, 28. Retrieved 22 November 2015.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.