William the Carpenter

Last updated • 6 min readFrom Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia
William the Carpenter
Born
France
OccupationViscount of Melun
Known forCrusader
Relatives Hugh I, Count of Vermandois, Philip I of France

William the Carpenter (fl. 1087–1102), viscount of Melun, was a French nobleman who participated in the Reconquista in Spain and on the First Crusade. He was notorious for defecting from the army both in Spain and on the crusade, but he was also known for his strength in battle, whence he earned his nickname "the Carpenter." He returned to the Holy Land after the crusade, and nothing further is known of his life or death.

Contents

Life

The Collegiate Church of Notre-Dame, Melun, dating from the eleventh century. Melun (77) Collegiale Notre-Dame Flanc nord.jpg
The Collegiate Church of Notre-Dame, Melun, dating from the eleventh century.

Succession

His specific origins are unclear; according to the seventeenth-century genealogist Père Anselme, he was the son of Ursio I, viscount of Melun, a town about 50 kilometres outside Paris in the Brie region of the French Vexin, which was later known as the Île-de-France. Anselme believed William succeeded his father in 1084, and was later succeeded by his own son, Ursio II. [1] However, in the nineteenth century, Adolphe Duchalais showed that Anselme misread the charters he was using; all that is known for certain is that Ursio was viscount in 1085 and William was viscount in 1094. There is no definite record of an Ursio II, and after William there is no viscount known until Adam, who married the daughter of the previous, unnamed viscount in 1138. William was presumably related to Ursio but his specific relationship to him and the other viscounts is unknown. [2]

According to twelfth-century chronicler Robert the Monk, William was "of royal stock" and was related to Hugh I, Count of Vermandois and Hugh's brother King Philip I of France. [3]

Military exploits

According to twelfth-century monk Guibert of Nogent, William was "powerful in words, but less so in action...a man who set out to do things too great for him." [4] William was a member of the French contingent which marched into Spain in 1087 to assist Alfonso VI of Castile with the siege of Tudela against the Almoravids. He may have been one of the leaders, along with Eudes I, Duke of Burgundy, who was the nephew of Alfonso's wife Constance. The French army never made it to Tudela and withdrew with little success. [5] [6] Guibert says that William "retreated like a wretch, leaving countless men stranded by his flight." [7] William's actions in Spain may have been the inspiration for the character of Ganelon in the Chanson de Roland , which was possibly written in the early twelfth-century, based on similar events that had occurred during the reign of Charlemagne centuries earlier. [8]

In France, Guibert says he engaged in petty warfare against other nobles and "criminal looting" of the countryside, in contravention of the Peace and Truce of God. In 1096 he joined the First Crusade, and "took from his poor neighbors the little that they had to provide himself shamefully with provisions for the journey." [7] He participated in the attacks on Jews at Mainz, led by Emich of Flonheim. [9] Emich's army later battled against the Hungarians, during which William "beheaded the chief of the Hungarian army, who was a member of the [ King Coloman's ] counsel, a distinguished man with dazzling snow-white hair." [10] After the dispersal of Emich's army following this battle, William and the other French leaders joined the army of his relative Hugh of Vermandois. [11] Hugh's army marched south into Italy, and at Bari, Hugh sent William across the sea to Dyrrhachium as an ambassador to the Byzantine governor of the city. [12] William then travelled to Constantinople with Hugh, and he was among the men who came to meet Godfrey of Bouillon when Godfrey arrived at the city later in the year. [13]

Capture of Antioch by Bohemond of Taranto. Painting by L. Gallait, 1840. Capture of Antioch by Bohemond of Tarente in June 1098.JPG
Capture of Antioch by Bohemond of Taranto. Painting by L. Gallait, 1840.

No further mention of William is made until the Siege of Antioch in 1098. The crusaders had successfully taken the city, but were then besieged themselves by a large Muslim army led by Kerbogha of Mosul. The crusaders suffered from lack of supplies, and there were many desertions; William fled Antioch in January 1098, along with the French monk Peter the Hermit, who had led his own army to Constantinople before the main crusaders arrived there. William was probably a member of Bohemond of Taranto's army at this point, because Bohemond sent his nephew Tancred to find them, and they were brought back to Bohemond's camp. [14] Robert the Monk assumes that William fled because "he had never before experienced such suffering from hunger." [15] William "spent the whole of the night...in Bohemond's tent, lying on the ground like a piece of rubbish." Bohemond rebuked him as a "wretched disgrace to the whole Frankish army", and mentioned his desertion of the French army in Spain in 1087. The other leaders asked Bohemond to spare him and William suffered no further punishment. However, William was so ashamed that he deserted the army again. [16]

Albert of Aachen says William's second desertion occurred in June 1098, along with William of Grand-Mesnil, a relative of Bohemond. On the road away from Antioch, they joined Stephen of Blois, another leader of the crusade who had also fled the siege. They travelled back towards Constantinople, but on the way met Emperor Alexius I Comnenus, who was advancing to Antioch with a relief army. They convinced him of the futility of the crusader siege and the emperor turned back to Constantinople. [17]

William apparently returned to the Holy Land in the Crusade of 1101. The First Crusade had successfully conquered Jerusalem, and those who had returned home before completing the journey were often shamed into going on crusade a second time; some of them, like Stephen of Blois, were killed on their second journey. [18] William, however, survived to participate in the politics of the newfound Kingdom of Jerusalem; he was among the men who petitioned King Baldwin I to restore Daimbert of Pisa as Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem. He was also present at Baldwin I's siege of Ascalon in 1102. [19] William may have settled in the north, in the crusader Principality of Antioch as a vassal of Bohemond, because he appears as a witness in a charter from Antioch in 1101. [20]

Nickname

William's actions at the Siege of Antioch are known from the Gesta Francorum , an anonymous chronicle written by an Italo-Norman eyewitness. The Gesta was very popular in Europe after the crusade, but was considered crudely written by more refined readers. It was later rewritten and expanded by more educated writers, including the French monks Robert and Guibert, both of whom were eager to add information about French crusaders like William. According to Robert, William "acquired the name of 'Carpenter' because nobody wanted to take him on in battle—there was no breastplate, helmet or shield which could withstand the shattering impact of his lance or sword." [21] Guibert says that he "was called the Carpenter, not because he was a craftsman in wood, but because he prevailed in battle like a carpenter, by cutting men down", and has Bohemond ask: "what kind of Carpenter did we have, who, like a construction-worker with a pick-axe, hacked away, with lances and swords, at the backs of the Gentiles?" [22] Christopher Tyerman interprets this as William's "skills as a battlefield butcher". [23] Edward Gibbon, apparently misunderstanding Guibert, thought the nickname came "from the weighty strokes of his axe". [24]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">First Crusade</span> 1096–1099 Christian conquest of the Holy Land

The First Crusade (1096–1099) was the first of a series of religious wars, or Crusades, initiated, supported and at times directed by the Latin Church in the Middle Ages. The objective was the recovery of the Holy Land from Islamic rule. While Jerusalem had been under Muslim rule for hundreds of years, by the 11th century the Seljuk takeover of the region threatened local Christian populations, pilgrimages from the West, and the Byzantine Empire itself. The earliest initiative for the First Crusade began in 1095 when Byzantine emperor Alexios I Komnenos requested military support from the Council of Piacenza in the empire's conflict with the Seljuk-led Turks. This was followed later in the year by the Council of Clermont, during which Pope Urban II supported the Byzantine request for military assistance and also urged faithful Christians to undertake an armed pilgrimage to Jerusalem.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Melun</span> Prefecture and commune in Île-de-France, France

Melun is a commune in the Seine-et-Marne department in the Île-de-France region, north-central France. It is located on the southeastern outskirts of Paris, about 41 kilometres from the centre of the capital. Melun is the prefecture of Seine-et-Marne, and the seat of one of its arrondissements. Its inhabitants are called Melunais.

Guibert de Nogent was a Benedictine historian, theologian, and author of autobiographical memoirs. Guibert was relatively unknown in his own time, going virtually unmentioned by his contemporaries. He has only recently caught the attention of scholars who have been more interested in his extensive autobiographical memoirs and personality which provide insight into medieval life.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hugh, Count of Vermandois</span> French noble (1057–1101)

Hugh, called the Great was the first count of Vermandois from the House of Capet. He is known primarily for being one of the leaders of the First Crusade. His nickname Magnus is probably a bad translation into medieval Latin of an Old French nickname, le Maisné, meaning "the younger", referring to Hugh as younger brother of King Philip I of France.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Dorylaeum (1097)</span> Early battle during the First Crusade

The Battle of Dorylaeum took place during the First Crusade on 1 July 1097 between the crusader forces and the Seljuk Turks, near the city of Dorylaeum in Anatolia. Though the Turkish forces of Kilij Arslan nearly destroyed the Crusader contingent of Bohemond, other Crusaders arrived just in time to reverse the course of the battle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Antioch</span> 1097–98 invasion of Seljuk-held Antioch during the First Crusade

The siege of Antioch took place during the First Crusade in 1097 and 1098, on the crusaders' way to Jerusalem through Syria. Two sieges took place in succession. The first siege, by the crusaders against the city held by the Seljuk Empire, lasted from 20 October 1097 to 3 June 1098. The second siege, of the crusader-held city by a Seljuk relieving army, lasted three weeks in June 1098, leading to the Battle of Antioch in which the crusaders defeated the relieving army led by Kerbogha. The crusaders then established the Principality of Antioch, ruled by Bohemond of Taranto.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tancred, Prince of Galilee</span> Italo-Norman leader of the First Crusade (1075-1112)

Tancred was an Italo-Norman leader of the First Crusade who later became Prince of Galilee and regent of the Principality of Antioch. Tancred came from the house of Hauteville and was the great-grandson of Norman lord Tancred of Hauteville.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Nicaea</span> Part of the First Crusade (1097)

The siege of Nicaea was the first major battle of the First Crusade, taking place from 14 May to 19 June 1097. The city was under the control of the Seljuk Turks who opted to surrender to the Byzantines in fear of the crusaders breaking into the city. The siege was followed by the Battle of Dorylaeum and the Siege of Antioch, all taking place in modern Turkey.

The Gesta Francorum, or Gesta Francorum et aliorum Hierosolimitanorum, is a Latin chronicle of the First Crusade by an anonymous author connected with Bohemond of Taranto.

Dei gesta per Francos is a narrative of the First Crusade by Guibert of Nogent written between 1107 and 1108. Traditionally it has not been well received by scholars, but recent translators and editors have shown it to contain important original material. Dei gesta was a radical departure for the type of literary work for Guibert who had previously worked on theological tracts. He decided to undertake a history of the crusade, he says, after he read an anonymous eyewitness account called Gesta Francorum. In the eyes of Guibert this work was rough and simple and "frequently left the reader stunned with its insipid vacuity". Guibert felt a much higher standard of grammar and diction was needed. He also inserted anti-Jewish rhetoric into the account of the First Crusade.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Ma'arra</span> Battle of the First Crusade

The siege of Ma'arra occurred in late 1098 in the city of Ma'arrat Nu'man, in what is modern-day Syria, during the First Crusade. It is infamous for the claims of widespread cannibalism committed by the crusaders.

Bartolf of Nangis is the conventional name given to the author of the Gesta Francorum Iherusalem expugnantium, a history of the First Crusade.

The Historia belli sacri, also called the Historia de via Hierosolymis or Historia peregrinorum, is a chronicle of the First Crusade and the early years of the Crusader states written by an anonymous monk of the Abbey of Montecassino. It covers the years 1095–1131 and must have been mostly compiled around 1130. It is sometimes called the "Monte Cassino Chronicle" for simplicity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Women in the Crusades</span> The role of women in the Crusades

The role of women in the Crusades is frequently viewed as being limited to domestic or illicit activities during the Crusades. While to some extent this is true, some women also took part in other activities, including armed combat in the battles of the Holy Land. This article focuses on the first Crusades and identifies known participants. It also highlights some of the more famous women of the later crusades. For a discussion of the sociological and religious aspects of the mixing of women with the predominantly male crusaders, the reader is referred to the referenced documents.

Robert of Bounalbergo, son of Gerard (Girard) of Buanalbergo and his wife whose name is unknown. Girard was the nephew of Alberada of Buonalbergo, who married Robert Guiscard and was mother to Bohemond I of Antioch.

Raymond Pilet (1075–1120), the only child of Bernard I Pilet of Narbonne and his wife, whose name is unknown. Seigneur of Alès. Bernard was the son of Raymond II, Viscount of Narbone from 1066 to 1067. The name “pilet” refers to a fur that the nobility wore over their cuirass and coats-of-arms. Raymond distinguished himself as a combatant during the First Crusade.

The army of Hugh the Great was formed after the Council of Clermont, led by Pope Urban II in November 1095. Hugh, son of Henry I of France, and his wife Anne of Kiev, was Count of Vermandois, de jure uxoris, due to his marriage to Adelaide of Vermandois. In August 1096, Hugh and his small army left France in prima profectione, the first army of the third wave to leave France, and travelled to Bari, Italy, and then crossed the Adriatic Sea to the Byzantine Empire, in an armada commanded by Arnout II, Count of Aarschot. When Hugh entered Constantinople, he carried a Vexillum sancti Petri, a banner given to him by the pope, Hugh being the last such noble to carry the banner.

The armies of Bohemond of Taranto, formed in 1097, include a major component of the First Crusade. He is regarded as the real leader of the First Crusade. He formed a second army in 1107 to defend Antioch but instead used it to attack the Byzantine emperor Alexios I Komnenos, resulting in the Treaty of Devol, codifying Bohemond’s defeat. Runciman estimates that the first army included 500 cavalry and 3500 infantrymen and other estimates that the second army was at 34,000 personnel strength are likely greatly exaggerated.

The following is an overview of the armies of First Crusade, including the armies of the European noblemen of the "Princes' Crusade", the Byzantine army, a number of Independent crusaders as well as the People's Crusade and the subsequent Crusade of 1101 and other European campaigns prior to the Second Crusade beginning in 1147.

The title of Advocatus Sancti Sepulchri, or Advocate of the Holy Sepulchre, has been ascribed to Godfrey of Bouillon in his role as the first Latin ruler of Jerusalem. In the aftermath of the First Crusade, there was disagreement among the clergy and secular leaders as the leadership of the Kingdom of Jerusalem. There was opposition to the naming of a king over the Holy City and the wearing of a crown in the city where Christ suffered with a crown of thorns. The original sources differ on the actual title assumed by Godfrey. However, it is generally accepted by most modern historians that, once Godfrey was selected to be leader, he declined to be crowned king instead taking the titles of prince (princeps) and advocate or defender of the Holy Sepulchre.

References

  1. Anselme de Sainte-Marie, Histoire Généalogique et Chronologique de la Maison Royale de France, des Pairs, Grands Officiers de la Couronne et de la Maison du Roy et des anciens Barons du Royaume (Reproduction de l'éd. de Paris: chez Estienne Loyson, 1674: Num. BNF de l'éd. de Paris: Bibliothèque Nationale de France, 1987. 1 microfilm Reproduction de l'éd. de Paris: Compagnie des libraires associés, 1730); vol. 5, "Généalogie de la Maison de Melun.", p. 221.
  2. Duchalais, Adolphe "Charte inedité de l'an 1138, relative à l'histoire des vicomtes de Melun" (Bibliothèque de l’école des chartes; vol. 6 no. 6, 1845), pp. 253–255.
  3. Sweetenham, Carol (tr.) (2005) Robert the Monk's History of the First Crusade = Historia Iherosolimitana. Aldershot: Ashgate; iv.XII, p. 128.
  4. Guibert of Nogent; Levine, Robert (tr.) (1997) The Deeds of God Through the Franks. Woodbridge: Boydell Press; bk. iv, p. 79.
  5. Reilly, Bernard F. (1988) The Kingdom of León-Castilla under King Alfonso VI, 1065-1109. Princeton University Press; p. 191.
  6. Riley-Smith, Jonathan (1997) The First Crusaders, 1095-1131. Cambridge University Press; p. 43.
  7. 1 2 Guibert of Nogent (1997), p. 79.
  8. Defourneaux, Marcelin (1949) Les Français en Espagne aux XIe et XIIe siècles. Paris: Presses universitaires de France; p. 269.
  9. Riley-Smith, Jonathan (2005) The Crusades: a history, 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, p. 28.
  10. Albert of Aachen; Edgington, Susan B. (ed. & tr.) (2007) Historia Ierosolimitana. Oxford University Press; I.29, p. 55.
  11. Riley-Smith, The Crusades, p. 28.
  12. Runciman, Steven (1951) A History of the Crusades, vol. I: The First Crusade. London: Folio Society, 1994, p. 120 (originally published: Cambridge U. P., 1951). Runciman's account is derived from Anna Comnena, who calls William "Tzerpentarios", a Greek rendering of his French nickname. Anna Comnena; Sewter, E.R.A (tr.) (1969), Alexiad . Penguin, p. 314.
  13. Albert of Aachen (2007), II.9, p. 75.
  14. Asbridge, Thomas (2004) The First Crusade: A New History. Oxford University Press; pp. 178–179.
  15. Robert the Monk (2005), p. 128.
  16. Hill, Rosalind T. (ed. and trans.) (1967) Gesta Francorum: the Deeds of the Franks and the Other Pilgrims to Jerusalem. London: Oxford University Press; pp. 33–34. August C. Krey's translation of the passage in The First Crusade: the accounts of eyewitnesses and participants (Princeton, 1921, pp. 136–139) can be found at the Internet Medieval Sourcebook, "The Sufferings of the Crusaders - 3. The Gesta Version". Guibert was not as forgiving as Robert, but he also gives hunger as the excuse for William's second flight (Guibert of Nogent (1997), p. 81).
  17. Albert of Aachen (2007), iv.39–40, pp. 311–313.
  18. Riley-Smith, Jonathan (1986) The First Crusade and the Idea of Crusading. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; p. 120.
  19. Albert of Aachen, ix.14-15, p. 655.
  20. Riley-Smith (1986), p. 72. The charter is in Reinhold Röhricht, Regesta Regni Hierosolimitani; no. 35, p. 5.
  21. Robert the Monk, pp. 127–128.
  22. Guibert of Nogent, p. 80.
  23. Tyerman, Christopher (2006) God's War: a new history of the Crusades. London: Penguin Books; p. 87.
  24. Gibbon, Edward; David Womersley (ed.) (1996) The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire , vol. 3, Chapter LVIII, p. 598.