Writing center

Last updated

A writing center at the University of Mississippi Writing Center.png
A writing center at the University of Mississippi

Writing centers provide students with assistance on their papers, projects, reports, multi-modal documents, web pages, and other writerly needs across disciplines. [1] [2] Although writing center staff are often referred to as Tutors, writing centers are primarily places for collaboration in which writers and tutors work together to help writers achieve their goals. [3] Typical services include help with the purpose, structure, function of writing, and are geared toward writers of various levels and fields of study. The goal is to help a writer learn to address the various exigences that they may encounter with the realization that no writing is decontextualized—it always addresses a specific audience. Writing centers may offer one-on-one scheduled tutoring appointments, group tutoring, and writing workshops. Services may also include drop-in hours. Writing tutors do not assign grades to students' writing assignments.

Contents

Overview

A writing center usually offers individualized conferencing whereby the writing tutor offers his or her feedback on the piece of writing at hand; a writing tutor's main function is to discuss how the piece of writing might be revised. Writing centers generally rely on non-prescriptive and non-corrective approaches [4] to construct a more complete account of how well a piece of writing aligns with the writer's aims. [5] In other words, a tutor usually does not proofread nor edit a student's work. Instead, the tutor facilitates the student's attempts to revise his or her own work by conversing with the student about the topic at hand, discussing principles and processes of writing, modeling rhetorical and syntactical moves for the student to apply, and assisting the student in identifying patterns of grammatical error in his or her writing. In other words, "[the job of writing tutors] is to produce better writers, not better writing." [6]

Writing centers at higher education institutions

History

Historically, writing centers in American universities began appearing as "writing labs" in the early 20th century. [6] [7] Elizabeth Boquet and Stephen North point to the origins of the writing laboratory as first a method, not a place, where "the key characteristic of which appears to have been that all work was to be done during class time". [8] This was to allow the student to compose with the teacher present, able to help with any revisions or questions the student may have. However, as class sizes and universities grew, Writing Centers began to develop as university institutions, often conceived of as an editing service for students. [6] As post-secondary institutions began accepting more and more students, writing centers were created to help students who were struggling with their writing abilities. [8] It was also at this time when writing centers began to employ student tutors, who were more affordable to hire than Faculty members. [8]

Location of writing centers

Writing centers may be centrally located at higher education institutions. [9] Centers may be located within a student success center, which may offer other academic support services to students such as study skills appointments and workshops. [9] These might typically be called Academic Skills Units [10] [11] or Learning Development Groups. [12] [13] Some writing centers may be part of a writing studies department or stand-alone. [14]

An example writing center Writing Center (14050616124).jpg
An example writing center

Some institutions also offer an Online Writing Lab (OWL), which generally attempts to follow the model of writing center tutoring in an online environment. These environments have been said to be a step toward a new model of writing centers, a model known as Multiliteracy Centers. [15] Another environment that could fall under this category is a physical space known as a digital studio.

Writing consultants

Depending on the writing center and the target population, consultants may be undergraduate peer consultants, graduate consultants, graduate peer consultants, staff consultants, or faculty consultants. [16] The consultants may be working for pay or for college credit. [17] If the writing center offers workshop or group tutoring sessions, staff, experienced undergraduates, or graduates may serve in an unofficial or official teaching assistant capacity. [17] Writing center research has examined what effect each type of consultant has upon the writer seeking help. [18]

In many cases, writing center directors or writing program administrators (WPAs) are responsible for conducting writing center assessment, and must communicate these results to academic administration and various stakeholders. [19] Assessment is seen as beneficial for writing centers because it creates a professional and ethical environment that is important not just for writing centers but for all higher education. [20]

Types of writers served

Writers served by these writing centers may vary depending on the setting. Post-secondary writing centers may serve undergraduate and graduate students in the same or separate facilities; [21] others may be more inclusive, serving students, faculty, staff, GED students, and the general public. [22] High school writing centers service enrolled students only. [23]

English-language learners

Writing centers may serve English-language learners from across academic disciplines who are undergraduate or graduate students at the institution. English-language learners receive one-on-one writing assistance with a tutor, who may be a peer or a writing specialist. The goal is to assist English-language learners with language acquisition and to help students feel more confident in their ability to write effectively in the English language. [24] Writing centers may develop resources and handouts for English-language learners on academic vocabulary and grammatical conventions. [25]

Some English Language Learners may access a writing center specifically for grammatical help and error revision from tutors. This may conflict with the philosophy of a writing center to help students become better writers through discussing the overall flow and organization of the paper, rather than focusing on sentence-level revisions. [26] [27] [28] Student tutors are generally taught not to edit papers during a session. Instead they are taught to collaborate on higher-level issues in their peer's paper. Much research has been done on if student tutors should take a more directive approach to teaching writing to English language learners. [29] [30] [31] Ultimately student tutors must receive training on how to effectively teach English as a second language at writing centers so that sessions are effective and meaningful for both English language learners and tutors. [31]

Writing center theory

Faculty, students, staff, and administrators often viewed writing centers as places for remediation. At their best, however, they are places where all students, including the best ones, can get better, a place (according to Karen Head), "that returns to the ideal of a safe space for active debate and discourse about the best ways to communicate in a variety of modes." [32] Collaboration in theory and practice is one particular idea of a writing center, although creating collaborative environment is really difficult. Collaboration allows tutors to involve students in a dialogue which helps to get in touch with their knowledge and find their unique voices. Collaborative environment rejects any kinds of hierarchies in the writing centers, thus allowing to negotiate and set common goals. [33] Writing center is an institutional response to the writers' needs to have a good listener and editor, someone who knows how to write and can ask questions about the writing which writers would not ask themselves. [6]

Variations

No longer strictly an American phenomenon, writing centers have spread in other world regions as well. [34] The European Association for the Teaching of Academic Writing (EATAW) is in part concerned with the study and advancement of writing centers in European universities. The International Writing Centers Association offers support for writing centers from around the world, with current regional associations in Europe and proposed associations in the Middle East, South Africa, and the Far East.

Writing centers are not exclusively a post-secondary phenomenon. Some high schools have successfully created writing centers similar to the model in higher education. [35] Some writing centers provide services for the non-academic community, such as peer-tutoring for out-of-school writers and workshops on a wide variety of topics. Some even have sites off-campus entirely, where they are sometimes identified as community writing centers. [36]

Writing centers are now being used in the business world. Notably, the Philadelphia Federal Reserve added a writing center. [37]

See also

Related Research Articles

In bilingual education, students are taught in two languages. It is distinct from learning a second language as a subject because both languages are used for instruction in different content areas like math, science, and history. The time spent in each language depends on the model. For example, some models focus on providing education in both languages throughout a student's entire education while others gradually transition to education in only one language. The ultimate goal of bilingual education is fluency and literacy in both languages through a variety of strategies such as translanguaging and recasting.

Collaborative writing is a procedure in which two or more persons work together to create a written document or content. This writing tool takes many different forms, including but not limited to academic papers, reports, creative writing, projects, and business proposals. Success in collaborative writing involves a division of labor, unique insights, and most importantly writing techniques. Oftentimes through a shared document, collaborators add edits, provide feedback, and record changes. Collaborative writing is often used in professional as well as educational settings, utilizing the expertise of those involved in the collaboration process.(Storch, 2005)

Instructional scaffolding is the support given to a student by an instructor throughout the learning process. This support is specifically tailored to each student; this instructional approach allows students to experience student-centered learning, which tends to facilitate more efficient learning than teacher-centered learning. This learning process promotes a deeper level of learning than many other common teaching strategies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tutoring</span> Instructor who gives private lessons

Tutoring is private academic support, usually provided by an expert teacher; someone with deep knowledge or defined expertise in a particular subject or set of subjects.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English as a second or foreign language</span> Use of English by speakers with different native languages

English as a second or foreign language is the use of English by speakers with different native languages, often with students whose native language is not English and are learning to speak and write English, commonly among students Language education for people learning English may be known as English as a foreign language (EFL), English as a second language (ESL), English for speakers of other languages (ESOL), English as an additional language (EAL), or English as a New Language (ENL), which refers to the practice of studying English in a country where it is not the dominant language. These programs, especially ESL, are usually an academic subject, course, or program designed to teach English to students who are not yet proficient in the language. While some people only refer to learning in an English-speaking country, learning this language can also entail learning in a non-English speaking or non-native nation.

Self-regulated learning (SRL) is one of the domains of self-regulation, and is aligned most closely with educational aims. Broadly speaking, it refers to learning that is guided by metacognition, strategic action, and motivation to learn. A self-regulated learner "monitors, directs, and regulates actions toward goals of information acquisition, expanding expertise, and self-improvement”. In particular, self-regulated learners are cognizant of their academic strengths and weaknesses, and they have a repertoire of strategies they appropriately apply to tackle the day-to-day challenges of academic tasks. These learners hold incremental beliefs about intelligence and attribute their successes or failures to factors within their control.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Composition studies</span>

Composition studies is the professional field of writing, research, and instruction, focusing especially on writing at the college level in the United States.

English-Language Learner is a term used in some English-speaking countries such as the United States and Canada to describe a person who is learning the English language and has a native language that is not English. Some educational advocates, especially in the United States, classify these students as non-native English speakers or emergent bilinguals. Various other terms are also used to refer to students who are not proficient in English, such as English as a Second Language (ESL), English as an Additional Language (EAL), limited English proficient (LEP), Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CLD), non-native English speaker, bilingual students, heritage language, emergent bilingual, and language-minority students. The legal term that is used in federal legislation is 'limited English proficient'. The instruction and assessment of students, their cultural background, and the attitudes of classroom teachers towards ELLs have all been found to be factors in the achievement of these students. Several methods have been suggested to effectively teach ELLs, including integrating their home cultures into the classroom, involving them in language-appropriate content-area instruction early on, and integrating literature into their learning programs.

Patricia A. Alexander is an educational psychologist who has conducted notable research on the role of individual difference, strategic processing, and interest in students' learning. She is currently a university distinguished professor, Jean Mullan Professor of Literacy, and Distinguished Scholar/Teacher in the Department of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology in the College of Education at the University of Maryland and a visiting professor at the University of Auckland, New Zealand.

Gender-neutral language or gender-inclusive language is language that avoids reference towards a particular sex or gender. In English, this includes use of nouns that are not gender-specific to refer to roles or professions, formation of phrases in a coequal manner, and discontinuing the collective use of male or female terms. For example, the words policeman and stewardess are gender-specific job titles; the corresponding gender-neutral terms are police officer and flight attendant. Other gender-specific terms, such as actor and actress, may be replaced by the originally male term; for example, actor used regardless of gender. Some terms, such as chairman, that contain the component -man but have traditionally been used to refer to persons regardless of sex are now seen by some as gender-specific. An example of forming phrases in a coequal manner would be using husband and wife instead of man and wife. Examples of discontinuing the collective use of terms in English when referring to those with unknown or indeterminate gender as singular they, and using humans, people, or humankind, instead of man or mankind.

Basic writing, or developmental writing, is a subdiscipline of composition studies which focuses on the writing of students sometimes otherwise called "remedial" or "underprepared", usually freshman college students.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Learning disability</span> Range of neurodevelopmental conditions

Learning disability, learning disorder, or learning difficulty is a condition in the brain that causes difficulties comprehending or processing information and can be caused by several different factors. Given the "difficulty learning in a typical manner", this does not exclude the ability to learn in a different manner. Therefore, some people can be more accurately described as having a "learning difference", thus avoiding any misconception of being disabled with a possible lack of an ability to learn and possible negative stereotyping. In the United Kingdom, the term "learning disability" generally refers to an intellectual disability, while conditions such as dyslexia and dyspraxia are usually referred to as "learning difficulties".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">First-year composition</span> Introductory core curriculum writing course in US colleges and universities

First-year composition is an introductory core curriculum writing course in US colleges and universities. This course focuses on improving students' abilities to write in a university setting and introduces students to writing practices in the disciplines and professions. These courses are traditionally required of incoming students, thus the previous name, "Freshman Composition." Scholars working within the field of composition studies often have teaching first-year composition (FYC) courses as the practical focus of their scholarly work.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Literacy in the United States</span> Overview of literacy in the United States

Literacy in the United States was categorized by the National Center for Education Statistics into different literacy levels, with 92% of American adults having at least "Level 1" literacy in 2014. Nationally, over 20% of adult Americans have a literacy proficiency at or below Level 1. Adults in this range have difficulty using or understanding print materials. Those on the higher end of this category can perform simple tasks based on the information they read, but adults below Level 1 may only understand very basic vocabulary or be functionally illiterate. According to a 2020 report by the U.S. Department of Education, 54% of adults in the United States have English prose literacy below the 6th-grade level.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plagiarism</span> Using another authors work as if it was ones own original work

Plagiarism is the representation of another person's language, thoughts, ideas, or expressions as one's own original work. Although precise definitions vary depending on the institution, in many countries and cultures plagiarism is considered a violation of academic integrity and journalistic ethics, as well as social norms around learning, teaching, research, fairness, respect, and responsibility. As such, a person or entity that is determined to have committed plagiarism is often subject to various punishments or sanctions, such as suspension, expulsion from school or work, fines, imprisonment, and other penalties.

Online tutoring is the process of tutoring in an online, virtual, or networked, environment, in which teachers and learners participate from separate physical locations. Aside from space, participants can also be separated by time.

Kenneth Bruffee was an American writing center administrator and professor emeritus in the department of English at Brooklyn College.

A dialogue journal is an ongoing written interaction between two people to exchange experiences, ideas, knowledge or reflections. It is used most often in education as a means of sustained written interaction between students and teachers at all education levels. It can be used to promote second language learning and learning in all areas.

David Ian Hanauer is Professor of Applied Linguistics/English at Indiana University of Pennsylvania and the Lead Assessment Coordinator for the SEA-PHAGES program at the University of Pittsburgh. He is the editor of the Scientific Study of Literature journal, the official publication of IGEL. Hanauer is an applied linguist specializing in assessment and literacy practices in the sciences and poetic inquiry. He has authored or co-authored over 75 journal articles and book chapters as well as 8 books. Hanauer’s research agenda is typified by the combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, as well as arts-based approaches, and scientific measurement of concepts traditionally considered abstract, such as voice in written text, project ownership and poeticity.

Writing center assessment refers to a set of practices used to evaluate writing center spaces. Writing center assessment builds on the larger theories of writing assessment methods and applications by focusing on how those processes can be applied to writing center contexts. In many cases, writing center assessment and any assessment of academic support structures in university settings builds on programmatic assessment principles as well. As a result, writing center assessment can be considered a branch of programmatic assessment, and the methods and approaches used here can be applied to a range of academic support structures, such as digital studio spaces.

References

  1. ↑ "International Writing Centers Association". International Writing Centers Association.
  2. ↑ Fitzgerald, Lauren; Ianetta, Melissa (2016). The Oxford guide for writing tutors : practice and research. Lauren Fitzgerald. New York. ISBN   978-0-19-994184-1. OCLC   890309982.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  3. ↑ Murphy, Christina and Steve Sherwood. "The Tutoring Process: Exploring Paradigms and Practices." The St. Martin's Sourcebook for Writing Tutors, 2nd ed. 1–25. [8]
  4. ↑ Fitzgerald, Lauren; Ianetta, Melissa (2016). The Oxford Guide for Writing Tutors: Practice and Research. Oxford UP. pp. 47–52. ISBN   9780199941841.
  5. ↑ Thonus, Terese. (2002). "Tutor and Student Assessments of Academic Writing Tutorials: What is 'Success'?" Assessing Writing, 8, 110–134.
  6. 1 2 3 4 North, Stephen (September 1984). "The Idea of a Writing Center". College English. 5. 46 (5): 433–446. doi:10.2307/377047. JSTOR   377047. S2CID   142801414.
  7. ↑ Lerner, Neal. (July 2010). Chronology of Published Descriptions of Writing Laboratories/Clinics, 1894- 1977, WPA-CompPile Research Bibliographies, No. 9. WPA-CompPile Research Bibliographies.http://comppile.org/wpa/bibliographies/Bib9/Lerner.pdf. 8.26.19.
  8. 1 2 3 Boquet, Elizabeth (February 1999). ""Our Little Secret": A History of Writing Centers, Pre-to-Post Admissions". College Composition and Communication. 3. 50: 463–482. doi:10.2307/358861. JSTOR   358861.
  9. 1 2 Yeats, Rowena; Reddy, Peter; Wheeler, Anne; Senior, Carl; Murray, John (2010). "What a difference a writing centre makes: A small scale study". Education + Training. 52 (6/7): 499–507. doi:10.1108/00400911011068450.
  10. ↑ "University of Portsmouth | ask". Archived from the original on 18 July 2003.
  11. ↑ "- YouTube". www.youtube.com.
  12. ↑ "Student learning". University of Plymouth.
  13. ↑ "Academic Skills Unit, University of Huddersfield Business School". Archived from the original on 22 May 2009.
  14. ↑ Finer, Bryna Siegel; White-Farnham, Jamie (2017). Writing program architecture: thirty cases for reference and research. University Press of Colorado. ISBN   9781607326274.
  15. ↑ Inman, James; David Sheridan (2010). Multiliteracy Centers: Writing Center Work, New Media, and Multimodal Rhetoric.
  16. ↑ North, Stephen M. (1994). "Revisiting "The Idea of a Writing Center"". The Writing Center Journal. 15 (1): 7–19. doi: 10.7771/2832-9414.1313 . JSTOR   43442606. S2CID   152132238.
  17. 1 2 North, Stephen M. (1984). "The Idea of a Writing Center". College English. 46 (5): 433–446. doi:10.2307/377047. JSTOR   377047. S2CID   142801414.
  18. ↑ Harris, Muriel (1995). "Talking in the Middle: Why Writers Need Writing Tutors". College English. 57 (1): 27–42. doi:10.2307/378348. JSTOR   378348.
  19. ↑ Gallagher, Chris (Fall 2009). "What Do WPAs Need to Know about Writing Assessment? An Immodest Proposal". WPA: Writing Program Administration. Retrieved 30 October 2015.
  20. ↑ Thompson, Isabelle (2006). "Writing center assessment: Why and a little how". Writing Center Journal. 26 (1): 33–54. doi: 10.7771/2832-9414.1592 . S2CID   251334797.
  21. ↑ Carino, Peter (1995). "Early Writing Centers: Toward a History". The Writing Center Journal. 15 (2): 103–115. doi: 10.7771/2832-9414.1279 . JSTOR   43441973. S2CID   151218923.
  22. ↑ "Online Assignment Writers to Guide (ALL STUDENTS)", Peripheral Visions for Writing Centers, Best Assignment Writers, pp. 57–80, retrieved 14 August 2019
  23. ↑ Graham and Harris (January 2005). "Improving the Writing Performance of Young Struggling Writers: Theoretical and Programmatic Research From the Center on Accelerating Student Learning". The Journal of Special Education. 39 (1): 19–33. doi:10.1177/00224669050390010301. S2CID   143917714.
  24. ↑ "About | English Language Learner Writing Center – Miami University". www.miamioh.edu. Retrieved 20 February 2020.
  25. ↑ "Writing Resources |English Language Learner Writing Center – Miami University". www.miamioh.edu. Retrieved 20 February 2020.
  26. ↑ Williams, Jessica (2004). "Tutoring and revision: Second language writers in the writing center". Journal of Second Language Writing. 13 (3): 173–201. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.009.
  27. ↑ Eckstein, Grant (2016). "Grammar Correction in the Writing Centre: Expectations and Experiences of Monolingual and Multilingual Writers". Canadian Modern Language Review. 72 (3): 360–382. doi:10.3138/cmlr.3605. S2CID   148386544 – via ERIC.
  28. ↑ Moussu, Lucie (2013). "Let's talk! ESL students' needs and writing centre philosophy". TESL Canada Journal. 30 (2): 55–68. doi: 10.18806/tesl.v30i2.1142 .
  29. ↑ Cogie, Jane (2006). "ESL student participation in writing center sessions". Writing Center Journal. 26 (2). doi: 10.7771/2832-9414.1604 . S2CID   251334667 – via Gale Academic OneFile.
  30. ↑ Blau, Susan; Hall, John; Sparks, Sarah (2002). "Guilt-free tutoring: rethinking how we tutor non-native-English-speaking students". Writing Center Journal. 23 (1). doi: 10.7771/2832-9414.1553 . S2CID   251328597 – via Gale Academic OneFile.
  31. 1 2 Myers, Sharon (2003). "Reassessing the "proofreading trap": ESL tutoring and writing instruction". Writing Center Journal. 24 (1). doi: 10.7771/2832-9414.1544 . S2CID   251330092 – via Gale Academic OneFile.
  32. ↑ Karen Head, "At the Center: Innovation in Research, Practice, and Service for 21st Century 'Writing Centers'," in: Humanistic Perspectives in a Technological World, ed. Richard Utz, Valerie B. Johnson, and Travis Denton (Atlanta: School of Literature, Media, and Communication, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2014), pp. 49–51 (49).
  33. ↑ Lunsford, Andrea (1991). "Collaboration, Control, and the Idea of a Writing Center". The Writing Center Journal. 12 (1): 94. doi: 10.7771/2832-9414.1252 . S2CID   150702273.
  34. ↑ Birgitta Ramsey, Composition Programs and Practices in Sweden: Possibilities for Cross-Fertilization with the United States, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, 2008, UMI Number 3326719 (Ann Arbor: University Microfilms International, 2008).
  35. ↑ Farrell, Pamela B. (Ed.) (2012). The High School Writing Center: Establishing and Maintaining One. WAC Clearinghouse Landmark Publications in Writing Studies. The WAC Clearinghouse. https://wac.colostate.edu/books/landmarks/hswc/
  36. ↑ Flower, Linda (2008) Community literacy and the rhetoric of public engagement. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press
  37. ↑ Bernoff, Josh (21 February 2017). "Why Your Organization Needs a Writing Center". Harvard Business Review. ISSN   0017-8012 . Retrieved 26 May 2023.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.