Alexandria Library sit-in

Last updated
Alexandria Library sit-in
DateAugust 21, 1939
Location
Alexandria Library,
Alexandria, Virginia, U.S.
Caused by Racial segregation in public library

The Alexandria Library sit-in was one of the first staged sit-in actions in the United States, pioneering the use of nonviolent direct action to demand equal rights for African Americans. On August 21, 1939, five Black men sat down inside the Alexandria Public Library and quietly read books, a transgression of the library's "whites only" policy. Their actions were coordinated by Alexandria attorney Samuel Wilbert Tucker, who planned the action to create a test case challenging the library's racial segregation policy. The men were escorted out of the library by police and charged with disorderly conduct. A ruling was not filed in their court case; in October 2019, all charges against the men were dismissed. The Alexandria sit-in is one of the earliest precursors in the U.S. of the strategies used during the civil rights movement.

Contents

Background and planning

The Alexandria Library was built on Queen Street in 1937 on the former Quaker Burial Ground, with the consent of the Society of Friends. It replaced a subscription library located in the former Lee Camp Hall, which had previously housed Confederate veterans. It was built with federal funds from the federal Public Works Administration and labor from the federal Works Progress Administration, as well as money donated by the family of Kate Waller Barrett, which insisted that the City of Alexandria commit to pay its operating expenses. [1] [2] Although funding for the library was provided by taxes paid by everyone in the community, Black people were not permitted to use the library. [2]

Samuel Wilbert Tucker had grown up just two blocks from the site of the Alexandria Library. [2] He received his undergraduate degree from Howard University and, although he didn't attend law school, passed Virginia's bar exam in 1934, at age 20. He was sworn in the following year and began practicing law. [3] He tried for several years to petition the library to provide equal access, but with no success. [2]

Tucker developed a strategy to use the courts to force the city to allow access: the first step would be to ask for a library card, and the second would be a peaceful sit-in. [2] On March 17, 1939, Tucker and his friend, retired army sergeant George Wilson, visited the library; Wilson filled out an application for a library card, and the librarian refused Wilson's request. [4] Subsequently, Tucker sued on Wilson's behalf, claiming that Wilson's rights had been violated. [4] While the Virginia Public Assemblages Act of 1926 required racial segregation between Black and white people, it did not allow Black people to be barred entirely. [4] Tucker continued his plans by training eight local African American men between the ages of 18 and 22 in how to conduct a nonviolent protest. [4] Five of these young men would take part in the library sit-in, while the other three were kept home by parents fearful of the threat of violence. [4]

Sit-in and immediate aftermath

On August 21, 1939, five well-dressed young Black men entered the Alexandria Library, one by one: William Evans, Edward Gaddis, Morris Murray, Clarence Strange, and Otto L. Tucker (Samuel's brother). [2] They each politely requested a library card, and when each was refused a card by the librarian, each walked to a shelf, grabbed a book, and sat down at a table. [5] They sat at separate tables and did not speak to each other, as Tucker wanted to ensure they took no action that would justify a charge of disorderly conduct. [5] The librarian, Katherine A. Scoggins, ran to the city hall to inform the city manager of what was happening, and he called the police. [4] Tucker called the media, and over 300 spectators watched police escort the five men from the building. [5] Photographers from both white and Black newspapers were also present to record the scene. [4]

The five young men were charged with disorderly conduct, even though all witness testimony was clear that they were well-mannered throughout. [4] Tucker defended them in court, and the judge avoided issuing a ruling. [4] Meanwhile, the judge in the George Wilson case decided that Wilson had not adequately proved that he lived in Alexandria, but that Wilson should apply again and the library would be required to issue him a library card. [4]

The white Alexandria Library board continued to resist integration, stalling with intense negotiations. [2] The board quickly approved the construction of a "separate but equal" library for African Americans, which opened in April 1940. [2] [6] Most books in the new Robert H. Robinson Library were donated used books or castoffs from the main Alexandria library. [6] Tucker refused an invitation to apply for a library card at this segregated branch, arguing that he should have equal access to the main library. [2]

Later developments

Tucker went on to serve as a lawyer for the NAACP, arguing in groundbreaking civil rights across Virginia and before the U.S. Supreme Court. [4] Virginia continued its massive resistance efforts to enforce segregation; the Alexandria Library was finally integrated to adults in 1959. [4] The Robinson library continued to provide service to Black children until 1962, when they were also allowed to use the main library. [6]

In 2019, research by the library staff showed that the judge had never issued a ruling and charges against the five men were still outstanding. [7] In October 2019, the Alexandria Circuit Court dismissed all charges, ruling that the men were "lawfully exercising their constitutional rights to free assembly, speech and to petition the government to alter the established policy of sanctioned segregation at the time of their arrest" and no charges should have been filed. [7]

Legacy

According to Audrey Davis, director of the Alexandria Black History Museum, the event was "an early crack in the wall of segregation", helping to pave the way for future achievements by African Americans. [5] Library scholar Brenda Mitchell-Powell discusses the significance of choosing a library as a site for civil rights protest, writing it "indicates Tucker's awareness of the centrality of libraries as settings for civic and democratic engagement and empowerment [...] ." [8] Importantly, the sit-in proved that nonviolent protest could be an effective strategy in the fight against segregation. [9]

A 1999 documentary Out of Obscurity: The Story of the 1939 Alexandria Library Sit-In was written and produced by Matt Spangler, including archival interview footage with members of the protest and a dramatization of the sit-in. [10]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Civil rights movement</span> 1954–1968 U.S. social movement

The civil rights movement was a social movement and campaign from 1954 to 1968 in the United States to abolish legalized racial segregation, discrimination, and disenfranchisement in the country. The movement had its origins in the Reconstruction era during the late 19th century and had its modern roots in the 1940s, although the movement made its largest legislative gains in the 1960s after years of direct actions and grassroots protests. The social movement's major nonviolent resistance and civil disobedience campaigns eventually secured new protections in federal law for the civil rights of all Americans.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">James Farmer</span> American civil rights activist (1920–1999)

James Leonard Farmer Jr. was an American civil rights activist and leader in the Civil Rights Movement "who pushed for nonviolent protest to dismantle segregation, and served alongside Martin Luther King Jr." He was the initiator and organizer of the first Freedom Ride in 1961, which eventually led to the desegregation of interstate transportation in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sit-in</span> Form of direct action

A sit-in or sit-down is a form of direct action that involves one or more people occupying an area for a protest, often to promote political, social, or economic change. The protestors gather conspicuously in a space or building, refusing to move unless their demands are met. The often clearly visible demonstrations are intended to spread awareness among the public, or disrupt the goings-on of the protested organisation. Lunch counter sit-ins were a nonviolent form of protest used to oppose segregation during the civil rights movement, and often provoked heckling and violence from those opposed to their message.

Racial equality is when people of all races and ethnicities are treated in an egalitarian/equal manner. Racial equality occurs when institutions give individuals legal, moral, and political rights. In present-day Western society, equality among races continues to become normative. Prior to the early 1960s, attaining equality was difficult for African, Asian, and Indigenous people. However, in more recent years, legislation is being passed ensuring that all individuals receive equal opportunities in treatment, education, employment, and other areas of life.

This is a timeline of African-American history, the part of history that deals with African Americans.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Greensboro sit-ins</span> 1960 non-violent protests in the United States

The Greensboro sit-ins were a series of nonviolent protests in February to July 1960, primarily in the Woolworth store—now the International Civil Rights Center and Museum—in Greensboro, North Carolina, which led to the F. W. Woolworth Company department store chain removing its policy of racial segregation in the Southern United States. While not the first sit-in of the civil rights movement, the Greensboro sit-ins were an instrumental action, and also the best-known sit-ins of the civil rights movement. They are considered a catalyst to the subsequent sit-in movement, in which 70,000 people participated. This sit-in was a contributing factor in the formation of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC).

Green v. County School Board of New Kent County, 391 U.S. 430 (1968), was an important United States Supreme Court case involving school desegregation. Specifically, the Court dealt with the freedom of choice plans created to avoid compliance with the Supreme Court's mandate in Brown II in 1955. The Court held unanimously that New Kent County's freedom of choice plan did not adequately comply with the school board's responsibility to determine a system of admission to public schools on a non-racial basis. The Supreme Court mandated that the school board must formulate new plans and steps towards realistically converting to a desegregated system. Green v. County School Board of New Kent County was a follow-up of Brown v. Board of Education.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Journey of Reconciliation</span> 1947 anti-segregation nonviolent protest in the southern United States

The Journey of Reconciliation, also called "First Freedom Ride", was a form of nonviolent direct action to challenge state segregation laws on interstate buses in the Southern United States. Bayard Rustin and 18 other men and women were the early organizers of the two-week journey that began on April 9, 1947. The participants started their journey in Washington, D.C., traveled as far south as North Carolina, before returning to Washington, D.C.

<i>Keys v. Carolina Coach Co.</i> Landmark 1955 US civil rights case

Sarah Keys v. Carolina Coach Company, 64 MCC 769 (1955) is a landmark civil rights case in the United States in which the Interstate Commerce Commission, in response to a bus segregation complaint filed in 1953 by a Women's Army Corps (WAC) private named Sarah Louise Keys, broke with its historic adherence to the Plessy v. Ferguson separate but equal doctrine and interpreted the non-discrimination language of the Interstate Commerce Act as banning the segregation of black passengers in buses traveling across state lines.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alexandria Library (Virginia)</span> Public library system of Alexandria, Virginia

Alexandria Library is the public library in Alexandria, Virginia in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Samuel Wilbert Tucker</span> American lawyer and civil rights activist (1913–1990)

Samuel Wilbert Tucker was an American lawyer and a cooperating attorney with the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). His civil rights career began as he organized a 1939 sit-in at the then-segregated Alexandria, Virginia public library. A partner in the Richmond, Virginia, firm of Hill, Tucker and Marsh, Tucker argued and won several civil rights cases before the Supreme Court of the United States, including Green v. County School Board of New Kent County which, according to The Encyclopedia of Civil Rights In America, "did more to advance school integration than any other Supreme Court decision since Brown."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charles Sherrod</span> American civil rights activist (1937–2022)

Charles Melvin Sherrod was an American minister and civil rights activist. During the civil rights movement, Sherrod helped found the Albany Movement while serving as field secretary for southwest Georgia for the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee. He also participated in the Selma Voting Rights Movement and in many other campaigns of the civil rights movement of that era.

The Richmond 34 refers to a group of Virginia Union University students who participated in a nonviolent sit-in at the lunch counter of Thalhimers department store in downtown Richmond, Virginia. The event was one of many sit-ins to occur throughout the civil rights movement in the 1960s and was essential to helping desegregate the city of Richmond.

This is a timeline of the civil rights movement in the United States, a nonviolent mid-20th century freedom movement to gain legal equality and the enforcement of constitutional rights for people of color. The goals of the movement included securing equal protection under the law, ending legally institutionalized racial discrimination, and gaining equal access to public facilities, education reform, fair housing, and the ability to vote.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sit-in movement</span> American 1960s civil rights campaign

The sit-in movement, sit-in campaign or student sit-in movement, were a wave of sit-ins that followed the Greensboro sit-ins on February 1, 1960 in North Carolina. The sit-in movement employed the tactic of nonviolent direct action and was a pivotal event during the Civil Rights Movement.

The Alexandria Black History Museum, located at 902 Wythe St., Alexandria, Virginia, is operated by the City of Alexandria. The building was formerly the Robert Robinson Library, originally constructed in 1940 as the first "separate but equal" library for African Americans in the segregated city.

Joseph Charles Jones was an American civil rights leader, attorney, co-founder of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), and chairperson of the SNCC's direct action committee.

Robert H. Robinson Library was one of the earliest libraries for Colored People in the United States, during the Jim Crow laws era. Robert Robinson Library was located at 902 Wythe St., Alexandria, Virginia, and was operated since 1940 by the City of Alexandria.

Prior to the civil rights movement in South Carolina, African Americans in the state had very few political rights. South Carolina briefly had a majority-black government during the Reconstruction era after the Civil War, but with the 1876 inauguration of Governor Wade Hampton III, a Democrat who supported the disenfranchisement of blacks, African Americans in South Carolina struggled to exercise their rights. Poll taxes, literacy tests, and intimidation kept African Americans from voting, and it was virtually impossible for someone to challenge the Democratic Party, which ran unopposed in most state elections for decades. By 1940, the voter registration provisions written into the 1895 constitution effectively limited African-American voters to 3,000—only 0.8 percent of those of voting age in the state.

Transport and bus boycotts in the United States where protests against the racial segregation of transport services before the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which outlawed forms of discrimination.

References

  1. ↑ Mitchell-Powell, Brenda (2022). Public in name only : the 1939 Alexandria Library sit-in demonstration. Amherst. pp. 96–97. ISBN   978-1-62534-657-5. OCLC   1285121224.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 "1939 Alexandria Library Sit-In". Alexandria Library. Retrieved 5 August 2020.
  3. ↑ Silcox, Nancy Noyes (21 August 2014). "75 Years After the Alexandria Library Sit-In". The Koji Nnamdi Show (Interview). Interviewed by Koji Nnamdi. Retrieved 5 August 2020.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Swain, Claudia (28 November 2016). "Alexandria Library Sit-In, 1939". Boundary Stones. WETA. Retrieved 5 August 2020.
  5. 1 2 3 4 Jones, Erica (31 January 2017). "Taking a Stand: Samuel Tucker and the 1939 Alexandria Library Sit-In". NBC Washington. Retrieved 5 August 2020.
  6. 1 2 3 "The History of the Alexandria Black History Museum". City of Alexandria Virginia. Retrieved 5 August 2020.
  7. 1 2 "City Dismisses Charges Against 1939 Library Sit-In Participants". Alexandria Living Magazine. 20 October 2019. Retrieved 5 August 2020.
  8. ↑ Mitchell-Powell, Brenda (2017). "The 1939 Alexandria, Virginia, Public Library Sit-In Demonstration". In Kimball, Melanie A.; Wisser, Katherine M. (eds.). Libraries - traditions and innovations : papers from the Library History Seminar XIII. Berlin: De Gruyter. ISBN   9783110448566.
  9. ↑ Sullivan, Patricia (7 August 2014). "Lawyer Samuel Tucker and his historic 1939 sit-in at segregated Alexandria library". The Washington Post. Retrieved 5 August 2020.
  10. ↑ Wyshynski, Greg (19 September 2007). "Civil Rights History". Alexandria Gazette Packet. Retrieved 5 August 2020.

Further reading

Radio shows
Videos

38°48′28″N77°2′49″W / 38.80778°N 77.04694°W / 38.80778; -77.04694

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.