Cabbage looper

Last updated

Contents

Cabbage looper
Noctuidae moth.jpg
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Lepidoptera
Superfamily: Noctuoidea
Family: Noctuidae
Genus: Trichoplusia
Species:
T. ni
Binomial name
Trichoplusia ni
(Hübner, 1800–1803)
Synonyms
  • Phytometra brassicae
  • Plusia innataHerrich-Schaffer, 1868

The cabbage looper (Trichoplusia ni) is a medium-sized moth in the family Noctuidae, a family commonly referred to as owlet moths. Its common name comes from its preferred host plants and distinctive crawling behavior. Cruciferous vegetables, such as cabbage, bok choy, and broccoli, are its main host plant; hence, the reference to cabbage in its common name. [1] The larva is called a looper because it arches its back into a loop when it crawls. [2]

While crucifers are preferred, over 160 plants can serve as hosts for the cabbage looper larvae. [3] The adult cabbage looper is a migratory moth that can be found across North America and Eurasia, as far south as Florida and as far north as British Columbia. Its migratory behavior and wide range of host plants contribute to its broad distribution.

The cabbage looper larva is a minor vegetable pest, especially for crucifers. While it is not significantly destructive, it is becoming difficult to manage due to its broad distribution and resistance to many insecticides. [1] [2] Numerous methods are being researched in order to control this species.

Taxonomy

The cabbage looper larva is a type of cabbage worm, a general term for a Lepidopteran pest that primarily feeds on crucifers. They closely resemble each other, in that they are all smooth and green, but they are not closely related in terms of phylogeny. In fact, none of the cabbage worms bear close phylogenetic relations, as they are all from different families. [2] The cabbage looper is a member of the family Noctuidae, one of the largest families in Lepidoptera. [4] It is related to other vegetable pests, like the cutworm and armyworms. [1]

Reproduction and life cycle

Mating

When ready to mate, cabbage loopers display by elevating their abdomen and fanning their wings. Males also fan out their abdominal hairs, open their genital claspers, and partially stick out their spermatophores. Males gradually expose more of their spermatophores as they wait for a mate. Upon interest, a potential mate examines the other's abdomen with antennae, and mating occurs if both agree. [5] Mating on average occurs at 2am, but has been observed occurring between 12 and 4am. [6] Mating generally occurs 3–4 days after emergence, but can occur up to 16 days afterwards. Usually, mating does not occur before the third day, as eggs are not fully developed upon emergence and require a few days to reach maturity. [3]

Multiple matings is a mating strategy where individuals have multiple mates in their lifetime. This is in contrast to monogamy, where individuals have one mate for life. Mating multiply can be advantageous to both sexes, which is why this strategy has evolved in many species, including the cabbage looper. For female cabbage loopers, rate of oviposition increases with the number of matings, and ultimately lay more eggs total. While it was once believed that multiple matings were necessary to fertilize all eggs, evidence shows that only one mating is needed to fertilize almost all eggs. Instead, it is more likely that the spermatophore provides nutrients to the female that confers reproductive benefits. This may explain why males produce female-attracting pheromones, as females may be seeking nutrient-rich spermatophores. For male cabbage loopers, multiple matings did not affect the quality of their spermatophores, suggesting that they can maximize reproductive opportunities without decreasing fecundity. [7]

Sexual role reversal

Conventional mate-finding strategy involves males seeking and competing for females and females caring for offspring. In many animals, however, the opposite occurs, where the females competes for males and males care for young. This role reversal can occur for a variety of reasons: environmental conditions, timing of fertilization, and biased sex ratios. For example, male fish often provide more parental care because, after females lay their eggs, males have to ensure that their sperm fertilizes the eggs and does not get washed away. It may be beneficial for the female to lay more eggs instead of caring for the eggs, so she departs as the male fertilizes the eggs, leaving him to care for the eggs. [8] The cabbage looper generally utilizes typical mating strategies, in that males compete for females. However, occasionally the reverse occurs, where females will seek males. This only happens under particular selection conditions, such as a shortage of males or host plants that bias the sex ratio towards females. [9]

Oviposition

After mating, the female seeks a host plant and lays her eggs, also known as oviposition. Oviposition actually can occur without mating, even as early as just after emergence from the pupa. However, oviposition right after emergence is futile, because the eggs do not mature in the female until the third day of adulthood, and therefore are not fertile until then. [3] [5] Host plant of choice for oviposition will depend on larval experience, known as learned host behavior. Moths unfamiliar with a host plant will avoid ovipositing on that plant and instead preferentially oviposit on a familiar host, even if the familiar host produces unappetizing chemicals. This demonstrates that larvae and moths develop host preferences and that the species is slow to determine whether a plant chemical is toxic, given that the larva is not immediately turned off by the unappetizing chemicals. [10] This choice is also influenced by insect waste, also known as larval frass, as its presence serves as a chemical deterrent for potential mothers. Larval frass indicates that the site is already occupied, therefore avoiding overcrowding. [11]

Life cycle

Egg

The cabbage looper eggs are generally yellow-white in color, dome-shaped, and patterned with ridges. They are 0.6mm in diameter and 0.4mm in height, and they are usually laid singly on the underside of leaves. [10] In one day, 40–50 females can lay 1000–2000 viable eggs. Viable eggs hatch after about three days, while unviable eggs fail to develop and collapse within that period. [12] Eggs are mostly found on leaves that are both larger and higher on the plant. It is not clear why eggs are preferentially laid on these leaves. [13]

Larva Trichoplusia ni larva.jpg
Larva

Larva

Cabbage looper larvae are a type of cabbage worm, green in colour with a white stripe on the side. After hatching, they are green and slightly hairy, but eventually turn green and lose the hair, leaving only a few bristles. They are identified by their looping behaviour, in which they arch their body in a loop when they crawl. Larvae are generally 3–4  cm long, and can have four to seven instars within 9–14 days. [1] Larvae initially do not consume much food but increase their consumption during their lifetime until they are consuming three times their weight daily. [12]

Pupa

Pupa Cabbage looper in cocoon.jpg
Pupa

When they pupate, they attach to the undersides of leaves and form a silky cocoon. [2] This stage can last 4–13 days, depending on the temperature of the environment. [1] Male pupae are slightly larger than female. [12]

Adult

The adult form is a moth with gray-brown front wings and light brown back wings. It is about 2.5 cm long and has a wingspan of 3.8 cm. Because they are nocturnal, adults spend their days protected by their host plants and begin activity 30 minutes before sunset. [1] Males can be distinguished from females by light brown hairs that lie flat against their abdomen. [5] Mating occurs 3 or 4 days after metamorphosis, during which 300–1400 eggs are oviposited. [3] From egg to adulthood, the cabbage looper's life cycle is generally 24–33 days long. [10]

Distribution and migration

The cabbage looper can be found across North America and Eurasia, as far south as Florida and as far north as British Columbia. [14]

Cabbage looper populations in North America migrate from Mexico to Canada, depending on the seasons. It generally overwinters in Mexico or southern California, where temperatures are above 16 °C (61 °F) even during winter. It used to be frequently found in Florida, but this has lessened due to fewer cabbage crops. [14] As northern regions of North America grow warmer, the cabbage looper gradually moves upward, only migrating if the region is above 16 °C (61 °F). [15] During summer, it is less commonly found in southern regions, due to high temperatures. Similar to the monarch butterfly, populations presumably migrate in groups, as there is little genetic difference between source and migrating populations. [16]

Similar seasonal distributions were found in Europe. There, the cabbage looper can be found from England to southeastern Europe. [15]

Temperature

The cabbage looper migration patterns are highly temperature dependent, as temperature can impact development. It has the greatest impact on pupation, where pupae often cease to finish metamorphosis if grown at 10 °C (50 °F). Even if pupae are transferred from 10 °C to 12.7 °C (54.86 °F), they often emerge deformed, sometimes developing an extra instar. Temperatures above 35 °C (95 °F) also result in physical deformations in adults, such as poor wing development. Mating and flight are negatively impacted by temperatures above 32 °C (89.6 °F) and below 16 °C, which may explain why cabbage loopers migrate to northern regions once temperatures reach 16 °C. [15] The time between female calling and male response increases as temperature increases, but when the temperature reaches 27 °C (80.6 °F), mating increases. At the same time, oviposition and longevity decrease, with hatching almost ceasing at 32 °C. [3] The embryo itself is actually quite resilient, as it is able to develop at 10 °C and at 40 °C (104 °F). However, although it is developed, it is unable to hatch. [17] Temperature does not affect the pheromone-sensitive receptor neurons. [18]

Host plants

The cabbage looper is a generalist insect that can reside and feed on over 160 host plants. The looper's variety of hosts is partially due to the ability of its salivary glands to differentially express based on the host. For example, cabbage and tomato plants use defensive strategies involving different compounds, and the cabbage looper can combat either by upregulating the appropriate genes. The gland's high responsiveness to the diet allows for considerable flexibility in host plants. The cabbage looper's preferred hosts are crucifers such as cabbage and broccoli, because it grows faster on these plants, possibly due to nutritional or chemical differences. [19] Tobacco can also be a host for the cabbage looper. However, it is not preferred because gummosis, a gummy substance produced by some plants, and trichomes, hair-like appendages, harm early larvae survival. Older larvae are more resistant to these defenses. [20]

The number of caterpillars on a plant can depend on a plant's maturity. Cabbages that mature early are less attractive, whereas cabbages just beginning to head are the most attractive. Among crucifers, there generally seems to be no preference for one specific type of crucifer, like kale over cabbage or broccoli over brussels sprouts. The only apparent preference is for red cabbage – nearby double the number of caterpillars were present on the red cabbage compared to the green. This suggests that the number of caterpillars on a host plant has less to do with the species of host than with the host's height and foliage. [21]

Attraction to odors

Cabbage loopers detect plant odors to locate food resources and suitable host plants for laying eggs, thereby increasing their chances for survival and reproduction. Mated females respond faster to plant odors compared to their unmated female and male counterparts. This difference in response time may be a result of mated females needing host plants for both food and egg laying whereas unmated individuals mostly use host plants for food, so mated females have greater motivations to find a host plant. [22] The cabbage looper is attracted to the floral compounds:

Although the strongest attractor is phenylacetaldehyde, the cabbage looper is more attracted to a blend of odors than phenylacetaldehyde alone. [23] [24]

Pheromones

Biosynthesis

Similar to other pheromone biosynthesis reactions, female cabbage looper pheromone production initiates with synthesis of 16 and 18-carbon fatty acids. This is followed by desaturation at C1 and chain shortening by two or four carbons. Finally, the fatty acid is reduced and acetylated to form an acetate ester. The result is a blend of different female pheromone compounds at a consistent ratio. This ratio can be highly altered by mutations in chain shortening proteins, demonstrating that the chain shortening step is important for determining the ratio of pheromones in the final blend. [25]

As a species, the cabbage looper does not hormonally regulate pheromone production. Stage specific proteins correspond to the development of the pheromone gland. The immature gland lacks numerous enzymes crucial to pheromone biosynthesis, such as fatty acid synthetase and acetyltransferase, which is why the looper cannot produce pheromones prior to the adult stage. Upon complete development of the pheromone glands at the adult stage, pheromones are constantly produced. [26]

Male pheromones

Although males engage in mate searching behavior more often than females, male cabbage loopers also produce pheromones from the hair pencils on the abdomen. [9] Different blends of pheromones serve as competitive advantages for mating, as certain pheromone components are more appealing to females than others. Cresol is important for attractiveness to females, while linalool is found in floral odors and is believed to attract individuals searching for nutrients. [27] Males around host plants are more attractive to females, because plant odor enhances the attractiveness of the male pheromone. This is advantageous to females because it helps with mate choice, as plant odor-enhanced males are more likely to be near a host plant. The male pheromone may also be related to food-finding behavior, as both males and females are more attracted to the male pheromone when starving. [28] Although there is no direct evidence demonstrating that males release pheromones in response to host plant odor, it is highly possible this behavior occurs, and that the lack of evidence is due to either the choice of host plant or the experimental setup. [29]

Female pheromones

Cabbage loopers are unique in that both females and males release pheromones in order to seek a mate. Generally, females release pheromones from the tips of their abdomens, and males seek females upon detection. [3] [6] Females around host plants are more attractive to males, possibly because females release more pheromones in the presence of host plant odor. Although it is not clear why host plant odors incite female pheromone production, this response may help reduce time wasted spent searching for a mate and therefore increase the chance of mating. [29] Female cabbage loopers usually attract the male, as females have more to lose by spending energy and time on searching for a mate. [9]

Detection

Cabbage loopers possess olfactory receptor neurons on their antennae for detecting pheromones. The neurons are specifically located on two sensory structures called sensilla that differ in length and pore density. Male loopers have two types of neurons, and depending on which sensilla that are present, the neurons will detect female pheromones at varying sensitivities to each of the six pheromones. The neurons are most sensitive to the main component of the female pheromone blend, cis-7-dodecenyl acetate, and the male inhibitory signal, cis-7-dodecenol. The presence of cis-7-dodecenyl acetate is crucial for male response to female pheromones, as it is 80% of the entire blend. The base region of the antennae, where receptor neurons for this pheromone are located, has more sensory structures than the ends. The base region is also less likely to experience damage, showing the importance of detecting the pheromone. [31] It is not clear why male neurons detect the inhibitory compound, as there is no evidence showing that females produce this compound. One possibility is that its presence in the female pheromone blend may be too small to be detected by scientific equipment. [32] The inhibitory signal only elicits a response when delivered alongside female pheromones to avoid mixing signals from other species, suggesting that while it cannot be detected in the female pheromone blend, it has an important role in female detection. [33]

These neurons are also capable of recognizing and responding to cis-7-tetradecenyl acetate and cis-9-tetradecenyl acetate. There are no specialized neurons for the other three pheromones. [31] Instead, these minor pheromones can cross-stimulate neurons, which is why partial blends that lack one or two of the minor pheromones can still fully stimulate the male receptors. [34]

Enemies

Predators

General predators like spiders, ants, and lady beetles prey on cabbage looper eggs and larvae, removing 50% of the eggs and 25% of the larvae within three days. Lady beetles consume at the highest rate. [35] Other common predators of cabbage looper larva include Orius tristicolor, Nabis americoferus, and Geocoris pallens. [36]

Parasites

While the cabbage looper frequently encounters parasites, its most common parasite is the tachinid fly. In one study, 90% of the parasitized larvae were due to the tachinid fly. [37] It parasitizes most often in the late fall and winter, but it is capable of parasitizing year-round. Cabbage loopers at their third or fourth instar yield the most parasites. It is early enough in the larval stage that the maggots still have time to feed and grow before pupation can prevent parasite emergence. It is also late enough that the caterpillars are large enough to support the maggots. Fly oviposition is often triggered by the larva thrashing to repel the fly, regardless of whether the larvae are already parasitized. As a result, larvae are often overparasitized, overwhelming and killing smaller larvae. During oviposition, the mother glues the fly egg to the host. This helps the maggot burrow into the larva, where it remains until the third day. The maggot cuts a slit into the back and eats its way out of the larva. [38]

Diseases

The moth is susceptible to viral diseases including nucleopolyhedrovirus (NPV). This is a naturally occurring virus whose natural hosts include Lepidoptera, arthropods, and Hymenoptera. From the family Baculoviridae , it is a type of Alphabaculovirus and its genome is 80–180kb long. [39] NPVs are commonly used as pesticides for the cabbage looper. There are numerous NPVs, many of which were isolated from the cabbage looper or the alfalfa looper. NPVs vary in infectivity and virulence. For example, the AcMNPV isolates are more infectious than the TnSNPV (the SNPV/single nuclear polyhedrosis virus specific to the cabbage looper) isolates in the first instar, while the TnSNPV isolates produced more occlusion bodies, protein structures that protect the virus and increase long term infectivity. [40] TnSNPVs are their most lethal during the third and fourth instars; they have detrimental effects such as delayed development, reduced egg production, and fewer hatched eggs. These effects are significantly diminished when the larvae are infected during the fifth instar, suggesting that the earlier infection is more effective. [41]

Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is a gram-positive soil bacterium from the phylum Bacillota. It is often used as a biological insecticide for numerous insect pests, including the cabbage looper, and reduces both growth rate and pupal weight. [42] The cabbage looper has demonstrated resistance to Bt, specifically the toxin Cry1Ac, due to an autosomal recessive allele. [43] Although it is not entirely clear which gene causes the resistance phenotype, there is strong evidence supporting the correlation between a mutation in the membrane transporter ABCC2 and Bt resistance. [44] Other studies with greenhouse-evolved population of Bt resistant cabbage looper demonstrate that the downregulation of the aminopeptidase N, APN1, results in its resistance. [45]

Genome

The cabbage looper genome is 368.2 Mb long (scaffold N50=14.2 Mb; contig N50=621.9 kb; GC content=35.6%) and includes 14,037 protein-coding genes and 270 microRNA (miRNA) genes. [46] The genome and annotation are available at the Cabbage Looper Database. [47] The cabbage looper genome is larger than the Drosophila melanogaster genome (180Mb) but smaller than the Bombyx mori genome (530mb). [48] [49] It encodes at least 108 cytochrome P450 enzymes, 34 glutathione S-transferases, 87 carboxylesterases, and 54 ATP-binding cassette transporters, some of which may be involved in its insecticide resistance. [44] It has the ZW sex-determination system, where females are heterogametic (ZW) and males are homogametic (ZZ). Its telomeres contain (TTAGG)n repeats and transposons belonging to the non-long-terminal-repeat LINE/R1 family, similar to the silkworm. [46] [50]

The PiggyBac Transposon, a widely used tool for genetic engineering, was originally discovered in the cabbage looper and subsequently identified in other taxa as well. [51]

Interactions with humans

Crop damage

Similar to the diamondback moth, the cabbage looper is one of the most problematic cabbage pests. The larvae eat large holes in the underside of leaves and consume developing cabbage heads. In addition, they leave behind sticky frass, contaminating the plants. They also consume the leaves of myriad host plants beyond cabbages. Although it is a damaging pest, the cabbage looper can be tolerated. For example, plant seedlings can endure the cabbage looper. However, the cabbage looper becomes more problematic once the plant begins heading. [2] This pest's infamous reputation likely stems from its ability to easily infest a variety of crops and growing difficulty managing it, because the cabbage looper is growing resistant to biological insecticides and synthetic insecticides. [1] [52]

Management

Sex pheromone traps

There is extensive research in cabbage looper pheromones for the goal of developing traps to catch the moth. Initial research involved isolation of the female pheromone to identify the compounds and potentially synthetically replicate the natural female pheromone. Scientists were able to develop a synthetic version that functions biologically like the natural form. [53] The synthetic female pheromone has been used with black light traps to study cabbage looper populations in various regions of the US. [15] Synthetic male pheromone has also been developed and was found to be effective in attracting and trapping both male and female cabbage loopers. The blend of male pheromones helped to trap females seeking mates and individuals seeking food. [27] Further studies in Arizona showed that pheromone baited black light traps are not effective in managing the cabbage looper. The traps did capture some males, which resulted in less mating and therefore fewer eggs laid. However, the effect was not large enough to cease using insecticides, as farming standards require crops that are basically insect-free. [54]

Insecticides

Scientists are actively seeking methods for controlling the cabbage looper. Known as an evolutionary arms race, scientists are constantly researching ways to control the cabbage looper while the looper evolves resistance to the management methods. Synthetic insecticides are relatively effective; however, many of them are banned for their toxicity. [55] One exception is Ambush. Studies have shown that this pyrethroid insecticide is effective at killing cabbage looper eggs, and its usage is permitted in the US. [56] Other studies have explored the usage of biological insecticides; for example, a polyhedrosis virus was shown to be effective. Unfortunately, managing large quantities of this virus would be difficult, so it is not a feasible option. [57]

An effective option is to use synthetic and biological insecticides together; this method seems to both control the population and slow the development of resistance, but it still requires the usage of toxic chemicals. [58] Currently, spraying Bacillus thuringiensis is considered to be the best option, possibly with NPV for an added benefit, [2] [59] but cabbage looper is growing increasingly more resistant to B. thuringiensis. Recent studies, however, have demonstrated that cabbage loopers resistant to B. thuringiensis are twice as susceptible to NPVs, which provides insight into novel biological control methods. [60]

Use in research

Baculovirus-insect cell expression is a technique used to produce large quantities of a desired protein. It takes advantage of the ability of Baculovirus to insert genes into its target cell and induce protein expression this gene. [61] Numerous insect cells have been developed into cell lines, such as fruit flies, mosquitoes, and silkworms. The tissue of the cabbage looper has also been used to develop a cell line. It is particularly useful for its fast growth rate and less reliance upon insect haemolymph in the medium. [62] The cabbage looper cell line has also been engineered to grow in serum-free media. Although serum helps insect cell growth, it is very expensive and can hinder subsequent experimental procedures. As a result, the development of the cell line to grow independently of serum means that the cell line could be used to produce viruses and proteins in a more affordable, efficient, and productive manner. [63]

Related Research Articles

<i>Helicoverpa zea</i> Species of moth

Helicoverpa zea, commonly known as the corn earworm, is a species in the family Noctuidae. The larva of the moth Helicoverpa zea is a major agricultural pest. Since it is polyphagous during the larval stage, the species has been given many different common names, including the cotton bollworm and the tomato fruitworm. It also consumes a wide variety of other crops.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Codling moth</span> Species of moth that feeds on fruit (Cydia pomonella)

The codling moth is a member of the Lepidopteran family Tortricidae. They are major pests to agricultural crops, mainly fruits such as apples and pears, and a codling moth larva is often called an "apple worm". Because the larvae are not able to feed on leaves, they are highly dependent on fruits as a food source and thus have a significant impact on crops. The caterpillars bore into fruit and stop it from growing, which leads to premature ripening. Various means of control, including chemical, biological, and preventive, have been implemented. This moth has a widespread distribution, being found on six continents. Adaptive behavior such as diapause and multiple generations per breeding season have allowed this moth to persist even during years of bad climatic conditions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cabbage moth</span> Species of moth

The cabbage moth is primarily known as a pest that is responsible for severe crop damage of a wide variety of plant species. The common name, cabbage moth, is a misnomer as the species feeds on many fruits, vegetables, and crops in the genus Brassica. Other notable host plants include tobacco, sunflower, and tomato, making this pest species particularly economically damaging.

<i>Phthorimaea operculella</i> Species of moth

Phthorimaea operculella, also known as the potato tuber moth or tobacco splitworm, is a moth of the family Gelechiidae. It is an oligophagous insect that feeds on the plant family Solanaceae and is especially known for being a major pest of potato crops. Currently farmers utilize insecticides, parasites, and sprinkler irrigation in order to prevent P. operculella from infesting their croplands.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lesser wax moth</span> Species of moth

The lesser wax moth is a small moth of the snout moth family (Pyralidae) that belongs to the subfamily Galleriinae. The species was first described by Johan Christian Fabricius in 1794. Adults are about 0.5 inches (13 mm) in length and have a distinct yellow head with a silver-grey or beige body. Lesser wax moths are common in most parts of the world, except in areas with cold climates. Their geographic spread was aided by humans who inadvertently introduced them to many regions worldwide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diamondback moth</span> Species of moth

The diamondback moth, sometimes called the cabbage moth, is a moth species of the family Plutellidae and genus Plutella. The small, grayish-brown moth sometimes has a cream-colored band that forms a diamond along its back. The species may have originated in Europe, South Africa, or the Mediterranean region, but it has now spread worldwide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European corn borer</span> Species of moth

The European corn borer, also known as the European corn worm or European high-flyer, is a moth of the family Crambidae. It is a pest of grain, particularly maize. The insect is native to Europe, originally infesting varieties of millet, including broom corn. The European corn borer was first reported in North America in 1917 in Massachusetts, but was probably introduced from Europe several years earlier. Since its initial discovery in the Americas, the insect has spread into Canada and westwards across the United States to the Rocky Mountains.

<i>Spodoptera litura</i> Species of moth

Spodoptera litura, otherwise known as the tobacco cutworm or cotton leafworm, is a nocturnal moth in the family Noctuidae. S. litura is a serious polyphagous pest in Asia, Oceania, and the Indian subcontinent that was first described by Johan Christian Fabricius in 1775. Its common names reference two of the most frequent host plants of the moth. In total, 87 species of host plants that are infested by S. litura are of economic importance. The species parasitize the plants through the larvae vigorous eating patterns, oftentimes leaving the leaves completely destroyed. The moth's effects are quite disastrous, destroying economically important agricultural crops and decreasing yield in some plants completely. Their potential impact on the many different cultivated crops, and subsequently the local agricultural economy, has led to serious efforts to control the pests.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Leek moth</span> Species of moth

The leek moth or onion leaf miner is a species of moth of family Acrolepiidae and the genus Acrolepiopsis. The species is native to Europe and Siberia, but is also found in North America, where it is an invasive species. While it was initially recorded in Hawaii, this was actually a misidentification of Acrolepiopsis sapporensis.

<i>Agrotis ipsilon</i> Species of moth

Agrotis ipsilon, the dark sword-grass, black cutworm, greasy cutworm, floodplain cutworm or ipsilon dart, is a small noctuid moth found worldwide. The moth gets its scientific name from black markings on its forewings shaped like the letter "Y" or the Greek letter upsilon. The larvae are known as "cutworms" because they cut plants and other crops. The larvae are serious agricultural pests and feed on nearly all varieties of vegetables and many important grains.

<i>Spodoptera littoralis</i> Species of moth

Spodoptera littoralis, also referred to as the African cotton leafworm or Egyptian cotton leafworm or Mediterranean brocade, is a species of moth in the family Noctuidae. S. littoralis is found widely in Africa, Mediterranean Europe and Middle Eastern countries. It is a highly polyphagous organism that is a pest of many cultivated plants and crops. As a result, this species was assigned the label of A2 quarantine pest by the EPPO and was cautioned as a highly invasive species in the United States. The devastating impacts caused by these pests have led to the development of both biological and chemical control methods. This moth is often confused with Spodoptera litura.

<i>Mythimna unipuncta</i> Species of moth

Mythimna unipuncta, the true armyworm moth, white-speck moth, common armyworm, or rice armyworm, is a species of moth in the family Noctuidae. The species was first described by Adrian Hardy Haworth in 1809. Mythimna unipuncta occurs in most of North America south of the Arctic, as well as parts of South America, Europe, Africa, and Asia. Although thought to be Neotropical in origin, it has been introduced elsewhere, and is often regarded as an agricultural pest. They are known as armyworms because the caterpillars move in lines as a massive group, like an army, from field to field, damaging crops.

<i>Synanthedon myopaeformis</i> Species of moth

Synanthedon myopaeformis is a moth of the family Sesiidae and the order Lepidoptera. In Europe it is known as the red-belted clearwing and in North America as the apple clearwing moth. The larvae create galleries under the bark of fruit trees, especially old trees with damaged trunks. During this process, the larvae cause significant damage to host trees. Particular attention has been paid to the damage they cause to apple trees. Their status as a pest of apple orchards has led to many research projects aimed at controlling populations of the moth. This moth is native to Europe, the Near East and North Africa. Recently, the moth was introduced into North America, being first detected in Canada in 2005. There are several organisms that threaten the larvae, including parasitoids, nematodes, and bacteria.

<i>Helicoverpa punctigera</i> Species of moth

Helicoverpa punctigera, the native budworm, Australian bollworm or Chloridea marmada, is a species of moth in the family Noctuidae. This species is native to Australia. H. punctigera are capable of long-distance migration from their inland Australian habitat towards coastal regions and are an occasional migrant to New Zealand.

<i>Chloridea virescens</i> Species of moth

Chloridea virescens, commonly known as the tobacco budworm, is a moth of the family Noctuidae found throughout the eastern and southwestern United States along with parts of Central America and South America.

<i>Helicoverpa assulta</i> Species of moth

Helicoverpa assulta, the oriental tobacco budworm, is a moth of the family Noctuidae. H. assulta adults are migratory and are found all over the Old World Tropics including Asia, Africa, and Australia.

<i>Cadra figulilella</i> Species of moth

Cadra figulilella, the raisin moth, is a moth of the family Pyralidae. The raisin moth is known most commonly as a pest that feeds on dried fruits, such as the raisin and date. It covers a range that includes much of the world, primarily situating itself in areas of California, Florida, the Eastern Mediterranean region, and some parts of Africa, Australia, and South America. The moth prefers to live in a hot, arid climate with little moisture and plentiful harvest for its larvae to feed on. Study of this species is important due to the vast amount of economic damage it causes yearly and worldwide to agriculture crops.

<i>Ostrinia furnacalis</i> Species of moth

Ostrinia furnacalis is a species of moth in the family Crambidae, the grass moths. It was described by Achille Guenée in 1854 and is known by the common name Asian corn borer since this species is found in Asia and feeds mainly on corn crop. The moth is found from China to Australia, including in Java, Sulawesi, the Philippines, Borneo, New Guinea, the Solomon Islands, and Micronesia. The Asian corn borer is part of the species complex, Ostrinia, in which members are difficult to distinguish based on appearance. Other Ostrinia such as O. orientalis, O. scapulalis, O. zealis, and O. zaguliaevi can occur with O. furnacalis, and the taxa can be hard to tell apart.

Liriomyza trifolii, known generally as the American serpentine leafminer or celery leafminer, is a species of leaf miner fly in the family Agromyzidae.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Capinera, John L. (2001). Handbook of vegetable pests. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. ISBN   9780121588618. OCLC   231682759.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Turini TA, Daugovish O, Koike ST, Natwick ET, Ploeg A, Dara SK, Fennimore SA, Joseph S, LeStrange M, Smith R, Subbarao KV, Westerdahl BB. Revised continuously. UC IPM Pest Management Guidelines Cole Crops. UC ANR Publication 3442. Oakland, CA.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 United States. Agricultural Research Service (1984), Suppression and management of cabbage looper populations, U.S. States Dept. of Agriculture, retrieved 25 September 2017
  4. ↑ "ITIS Standard Report Page: Trichoplusia ni". www.itis.gov. Retrieved 2017-10-02.
  5. 1 2 3 Shorey, H. H.; Andres, L. A.; Hale, R. L. (1962-09-01). "The Biology of Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). I. Life History and Behavior". Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 55 (5): 591–597. doi: 10.1093/aesa/55.5.591 .
  6. 1 2 Ignoffo, C. M.; Berger, R. S.; Graham, H. M.; Martin, D. F. (1963). "Sex Attractant of Cabbage Looper, Trichoplusia ni (Hubner)". Science. 141 (3584): 902–903. Bibcode:1963Sci...141..902I. doi:10.1126/science.141.3584.902. JSTOR   1712300. PMID   17844012. S2CID   42160057.
  7. ↑ Ward, Kenneth E.; Landolt, Peter J. (1995-11-01). "Influence of Multiple Matings on Fecundity and Longevity of Female Cabbage Looper Moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)". Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 88 (6): 768–772. doi:10.1093/aesa/88.6.768.
  8. ↑ Davies, N. B.; Krebs, J. R.; West, Stuart A. (2012). An introduction to behavioural ecology (4th ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN   9781405114165. OCLC   785989129.
  9. 1 2 3 Landolt, Peter J.; Heath, Robert R. (1990). "Sexual Role Reversal in Mate-Finding Strategies of the Cabbage Looper Moth". Science. 249 (4972): 1026–1028. Bibcode:1990Sci...249.1026L. doi:10.1126/science.249.4972.1026. JSTOR   2878137. PMID   17789611. S2CID   36919369.
  10. 1 2 3 Chow, Jennifer K.; Akhtar, Yasmin; Isman, Murray B. (2005-09-01). "The effects of larval experience with a complex plant latex on subsequent feeding and oviposition by the cabbage looper moth: Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)". Chemoecology. 15 (3): 129–133. Bibcode:2005Checo..15..129C. doi:10.1007/s00049-005-0304-x. S2CID   21637615.
  11. ↑ Renwick, J. a. A.; Radke, Celia D. (1980-06-01). "An Oviposition Deterrent Associated with Frass from Feeding Larvae of the Cabbage Looper, Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)". Environmental Entomology. 9 (3): 318–320. doi:10.1093/ee/9.3.318.
  12. 1 2 3 McEwen, F. L.; Hervey, G. E. R. (1960-03-01). "Mass-Rearing the Cabbage Looper, Trichoplusia NI, with Notes on Its Biology in the Laboratory". Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 53 (2): 229–234. doi: 10.1093/aesa/53.2.229 .
  13. ↑ Wilson, L. T.; Gutierrez, A. P.; Hogg, D. B. (1982-02-01). "Within-Plant Distribution of Cabbage Looper, Trichoplusia ni (Hübner)1 on Cotton: Development of a Sampling Plan for Eggs". Environmental Entomology. 11 (1): 251–254. doi:10.1093/ee/11.1.251.
  14. 1 2 Tingle, F. C.; Mitchell, E. R. (1977). "Seasonal Populations of Armyworms and Loopers at Hastings, Florida". The Florida Entomologist. 60 (2): 115–122. doi:10.2307/3494389. JSTOR   3494389.
  15. 1 2 3 4 Chalfant, R. B.; Creighton, C. S; Greene, G. L.; Mitchell, E. R.; Stanley, J. M.; Webb, J. C. (1974-12-01). "Cabbage Looper: Populations in BL Traps Baited with Sex Pheromone in Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina". Journal of Economic Entomology. 67 (6): 741–745. doi:10.1093/jee/67.6.741.
  16. ↑ Franklin, Michelle T.; Ritland, Carol E.; Myers, Judith H. (2011-01-01). "Genetic analysis of cabbage loopers, Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), a seasonal migrant in western North America". Evolutionary Applications. 4 (1): 89–99. Bibcode:2011EvApp...4...89F. doi:10.1111/j.1752-4571.2010.00135.x. PMC   3352513 . PMID   25567955.
  17. ↑ Toba, H. H.; Kishaba, A. N.; Pangaldan, R.; Vail, P. V. (1973-09-17). "Temperature and the Development of the Cabbage Looper". Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 66 (5): 965–974. doi:10.1093/aesa/66.5.965.
  18. ↑ Grant, Alan J.; Borroni, Paola F.; O'connell, Robert J. (1996-03-01). "Different seasonal rearing conditions do not affect pheromone-sensitive receptor neurons of the adult cabbage looper moth, Trichoplusia ni". Physiological Entomology. 21 (1): 59–63. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3032.1996.tb00835.x. S2CID   86662708.
  19. ↑ Rivera-Vega LJ, Galbraith DA, Grozinger CM, Felton GW (2017). "Host plant driven transcriptome plasticity in the salivary glands of the cabbage looper (Trichoplusia ni)". PLOS ONE. 12 (8): e0182636. Bibcode:2017PLoSO..1282636R. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182636 . PMC   5549731 . PMID   28792546.
  20. ↑ Elsey, K. D.; Rabb, R. L. (1967-12-01). "Biology of the Cabbage Looper on Tobacco In North Carolina1". Journal of Economic Entomology. 60 (6): 1636–1639. doi:10.1093/jee/60.6.1636.
  21. ↑ Harrison, P. K.; Brubaker, Ross W. (1943-08-01). "The Relative Abundance of Cabbage Caterpillars on Cole Crops Grown under Similar Conditions1". Journal of Economic Entomology. 36 (4): 589–592. doi:10.1093/jee/36.4.589.
  22. ↑ Landolt, P. J. (1989). "Attraction of the cabbage looper to host plants and host plant odor in the laboratory". Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 53 (2): 117–123. Bibcode:1989EEApp..53..117L. doi:10.1111/j.1570-7458.1989.tb01295.x. S2CID   83865044.
  23. ↑ Heath, Robert R.; Landolt, Peter J.; Dueben, Barbara; Lenczewski, Barbara (1992-08-01). "Identification of Floral Compounds of Night-Blooming Jessamine Attractive to Cabbage Looper Moths". Environmental Entomology. 21 (4): 854–859. doi: 10.1093/ee/21.4.854 .
  24. ↑ Landolt, Peter J.; Adams, Todd; Zack, Richard S. (2006-04-01). "Field Response of Alfalfa Looper and Cabbage Looper Moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae, Plusiinae) to Single and Binary Blends of Floral Odorants". Environmental Entomology. 35 (2): 276–281. doi: 10.1603/0046-225X-35.2.276 .
  25. ↑ Jurenka, Russell A.; Haynes, Kenneth F.; Adlof, Richard O.; Bengtsson, Marie; Roelofs, Wendell L. (1994). "Sex pheromone component ratio in the cabbage looper moth altered by a mutation affecting the fatty acid chain-shortening reactions in the pheromone biosynthetic pathway". Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 24 (4): 373–381. doi: 10.1016/0965-1748(94)90030-2 .
  26. ↑ Tang, Juliet D.; Wolf, Walter A.; Roelofs, Wendell L.; Knipple, Douglas C. (1991). "Development of functionally competent cabbage looper moth sex pheromone glands". Insect Biochemistry. 21 (6): 573–581. doi:10.1016/0020-1790(91)90027-c.
  27. 1 2 Landolt, Peter J.; Zack, Richard S.; Green, D.; Decamelo, L. (2004). "Cabbage Looper Moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Trapped with Male Pheromone". The Florida Entomologist. 87 (3): 294–299. doi: 10.1653/0015-4040(2004)087[0294:CLMLNT]2.0.CO;2 . JSTOR   3496741.
  28. ↑ Landolt, P. J.; Molina, O. H.; Heath, R. R.; Ward, K.; Dueben, B. D.; Millar, J. G. (1996-05-01). "Starvation of Cabbage Looper Moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Increases Attraction to Male Pheromone". Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 89 (3): 459–465. doi: 10.1093/aesa/89.3.459 .
  29. 1 2 Landolt, P. J.; Heath, R. R.; Millar, J. G.; Davis-Hernandez, K. M.; Dueben, B. D.; Ward, K. E. (1994-11-01). "Effects of host plant, Gossypium hirsutum L., on sexual attraction of cabbage looper moths, Trichoplusia ni (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)". Journal of Chemical Ecology. 20 (11): 2959–2974. Bibcode:1994JCEco..20.2959L. doi:10.1007/bf02098402. PMID   24241928. S2CID   2449582.
  30. ↑ Bjostad, L. B.; Linn, C. E.; Du, J.-W.; Roelofs, W. L. (1984-09-01). "Identification of new sex pheromone components in Trichoplusia ni, predicted from biosynthetic precursors". Journal of Chemical Ecology. 10 (9): 1309–1323. Bibcode:1984JCEco..10.1309B. doi:10.1007/BF00988113. PMID   24317583. S2CID   10622291.
  31. 1 2 Grant, A. J.; Riendeau, C. J.; O'Connell, R. J. (1998-10-01). "Spatial organization of olfactory receptor neurons on the antenna of the cabbage looper moth". Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 183 (4): 433–442. doi:10.1007/s003590050269. S2CID   23977383.
  32. ↑ Grant, Alan J.; O'Connell, Robert J. (1986). "Neurophysiological and morphological investigations of pheromone-sensitive sensilla on the antenna of male Trichoplusia ni". Journal of Insect Physiology. 32 (6): 503–515. doi:10.1016/0022-1910(86)90065-x.
  33. ↑ Liu, Yong-Biao; Haynes, Kenneth F. (1992-03-01). "Filamentous nature of pheromone plumes protects integrity of signal from background chemical noise in cabbage looper moth, Trichoplusia ni". Journal of Chemical Ecology. 18 (3): 299–307. Bibcode:1992JCEco..18..299L. doi:10.1007/bf00994233. PMID   24254938. S2CID   24762520.
  34. ↑ Todd, J. L.; Anton, S.; Hansson, B. S.; Baker, T. C. (1995). "Functional organization of the macroglomerular complex related to behaviourally expressed olfactory redundancy in male cabbage looper moths". Physiological Entomology. 20 (4): 349–361. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3032.1995.tb00826.x. S2CID   53060013.
  35. ↑ Lowenstein, David M.; Gharehaghaji, Maryam; Wise, David H. (2017-02-01). "Substantial Mortality of Cabbage Looper (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) From Predators in Urban Agriculture Is not Influenced by Scale of Production or Variation in Local and Landscape-Level Factors". Environmental Entomology. 46 (1): 30–37. doi:10.1093/ee/nvw147. PMID   28025223. S2CID   22623538.
  36. ↑ Ehler, L. E.; Eveleens, K. G.; Bosch, R. Van Den (1973-12-01). "An Evaluation of Some Natural Enemies of Cabbage Looper on Cotton in California". Environmental Entomology. 2 (6): 1009–1015. doi: 10.1093/ee/2.6.1009 .
  37. ↑ Oatman, Earl R. (1966-10-01). "An Ecological Study of Cabbage Looper and Imported Cabbageworm Populations on Cruciferous Crops in Southern California". Journal of Economic Entomology. 59 (5): 1134–1139. doi:10.1093/jee/59.5.1134.
  38. ↑ Brubaker, R. W. (1968-02-01). "Seasonal Occurrence of Voria ruralis a Parasite of the Cabbage Looper, in Arizona, and Its Behavior and Development in Laboratory Culture". Journal of Economic Entomology. 61 (1): 306–309. doi:10.1093/jee/61.1.306.
  39. ↑ "Alphabaculovirus". viralzone.expasy.org. Retrieved 2017-12-16.
  40. ↑ Erlandson, Martin; Newhouse, Sarah; Moore, Keith; Janmaat, Alida; Myers, Judy; Theilmann, David (2007). "Characterization of baculovirus isolates from Trichoplusia ni populations from vegetable greenhouses". Biological Control. 41 (2): 256–263. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.01.011.
  41. ↑ Milks, Maynard L; Burnstyn, Igor; Myers, Judith H (1998). "Influence of Larval Age on the Lethal and Sublethal Effects of the Nucleopolyhedrovirus of Trichoplusia niin the Cabbage Looper". Biological Control. 12 (2): 119–126. doi:10.1006/bcon.1998.0616.
  42. ↑ Janmaat, Alida F.; Myers, Judith (2003-11-07). "Rapid evolution and the cost of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in greenhouse populations of cabbage loopers, Trichoplusia ni". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 270 (1530): 2263–2270. doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2497. PMC   1691497 . PMID   14613613.
  43. ↑ Kain, Wendy C.; Zhao, Jian-Zhou; Janmaat, Alida F.; Myers, Judith; Shelton, Anthony M.; Wang, Ping (2004). "Inheritance of Resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac Toxin in a Greenhouse-Derived Strain of Cabbage Looper (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)". Journal of Economic Entomology. 97 (6): 2073–2078. doi:10.1603/0022-0493-97.6.2073. PMID   15666767. S2CID   13920351.
  44. 1 2 Baxter, Simon W.; Badenes-Pérez, Francisco R.; Morrison, Anna; Vogel, Heiko; Crickmore, Neil; Kain, Wendy; Wang, Ping; Heckel, David G.; Jiggins, Chris D. (2011-10-01). "Parallel Evolution of Bacillus thuringiensis Toxin Resistance in Lepidoptera". Genetics. 189 (2): 675–679. doi:10.1534/genetics.111.130971. PMC   3189815 . PMID   21840855.
  45. ↑ Tiewsiri, Kasorn; Wang, Ping (2011-08-23). "Differential alteration of two aminopeptidases N associated with resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cry1Ac in cabbage looper". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108 (34): 14037–14042. Bibcode:2011PNAS..10814037T. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1102555108 . PMC   3161562 . PMID   21844358.
  46. 1 2 Fu, Yu; Yang, Yujing; Zhang, Han; Farley, Gwen; Wang, Junling; Quarles, Kaycee A; Weng, Zhiping; Zamore, Phillip D (2018-01-29). "The genome of the Hi5 germ cell line from Trichoplusia ni, an agricultural pest and novel model for small RNA biology". eLife. 7. doi: 10.7554/eLife.31628 . PMC   5844692 . PMID   29376823.
  47. ↑ Yu, Fu. "Cabbage Looper Database". Cabbage Looper Database. Retrieved 5 October 2017.
  48. ↑ Adams, Mark D.; Celniker, Susan E.; Holt, Robert A.; Evans, Cheryl A.; Gocayne, Jeannine D.; Amanatides, Peter G.; Scherer, Steven E.; Li, Peter W.; Hoskins, Roger A. (2000-03-24). "The Genome Sequence of Drosophila melanogaster". Science. 287 (5461): 2185–2195. Bibcode:2000Sci...287.2185.. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.549.8639 . doi:10.1126/science.287.5461.2185. PMID   10731132.
  49. ↑ Group, Biology analysis; Xia, Qingyou; Zhou, Zeyang; Lu, Cheng; Cheng, Daojun; Dai, Fangyin; Li, Bin; Zhao, Ping; Zha, Xingfu (2004-12-10). "A Draft Sequence for the Genome of the Domesticated Silkworm (Bombyx mori)". Science. 306 (5703): 1937–1940. Bibcode:2004Sci...306.1937X. doi:10.1126/science.1102210. PMID   15591204. S2CID   7227719.
  50. ↑ Fujiwara, Haruhiko; Osanai, Mizuko; Matsumoto, Takumi; Kojima, Kenji K. (2005-07-01). "Telomere-specific non-LTR retrotransposons and telomere maintenance in the silkworm, Bombyx mori". Chromosome Research. 13 (5): 455–467. doi:10.1007/s10577-005-0990-9. PMID   16132811. S2CID   21067290.
  51. ↑ Yusa, Kosuke (2015-04-02). Chandler, Mick; Craig, Nancy (eds.). "piggyBac Transposon". Microbiology Spectrum. 3 (2): MDNA3–0028–2014. doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.MDNA3-0028-2014. ISSN   2165-0497. PMID   26104701.
  52. ↑ Brett, Charles H.; Campbell, W. V.; Habeck, Dale E. (1958-04-01). "Control of Three Species of Cabbage Caterpillars with Some New Insecticide Dusts". Journal of Economic Entomology. 51 (2): 254–255. doi:10.1093/jee/51.2.254.
  53. ↑ Berger, R. S. (1966-07-01). "Isolation, Identification, and Synthesis of the Sex Attractant of the Cabbage Looper, Trichoplusia ni". Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 59 (4): 767–771. doi:10.1093/aesa/59.4.767.
  54. ↑ Debolt JW, Wolf WW, Henneberry TJ, Vail PV. 1979. Evaluation of light traps and sex pheromone for control of cabbage looper and other lepidopterous insect pests of lettuce. USDA Technical Bulletin 1606.
  55. ↑ Wolfenbarger, Dan A.; Wolfenbarger, D. O. (1966). "Control of Two Lepidopterous Cabbage Pests by Use of Different Insecticides and Application Methods". The Florida Entomologist. 49 (2): 87–90. doi:10.2307/3493533. JSTOR   3493533.
  56. ↑ Tysowsky, Michael; Gallo, Tom (1977). "Ovicidal Activity of Ambush™, a Synthetic Pyrethroid Insecticide, on Corn Earworm, Fall Armyworm, and Cabbage Looper". The Florida Entomologist. 60 (4): 287–290. doi:10.2307/3493926. JSTOR   3493926.
  57. ↑ Genung, W. G. (1959). "Observations on and Preliminary Experiments with a Polyhedrosis Virus for Control of Cabbage Looper, Trichoplusia ni (Hbn.)". The Florida Entomologist. 42 (3): 99–104. doi:10.2307/3492603. JSTOR   3492603.
  58. ↑ Genung, William G. (1960). "Comparison of Insecticides, Insect Pathogens and Insecticide-Pathogen Combinations for Control of Cabbage Looper Trichoplusia ni (Hbn.)". The Florida Entomologist. 43 (2): 65–68. doi:10.2307/3492381. JSTOR   3492381.
  59. ↑ Mcvay, John R.; Gudauskas, Robert T.; Harper, James D. (1977). "Effects of Bacillus thuringiensis Nuclear-Polyhedrosis Virus Mixtures on Trichoplusia ni Larvae". Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 29 (3): 367–372. doi:10.1016/s0022-2011(77)80045-1.
  60. ↑ Sarfraz, Rana M.; Cervantes, Veronica; Myers, Judith H. (2010). "Resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in the cabbage looper (Trichoplusia ni) increases susceptibility to a nucleopolyhedrovirus". Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 105 (2): 204–206. doi:10.1016/j.jip.2010.06.009. PMID   20600095.
  61. ↑ Jarvis, Donald L. (2009). "Chapter 14 Baculovirus–Insect Cell Expression Systems". Guide to Protein Purification, 2nd Edition. Methods in Enzymology. Vol. 463. pp. 191–222. doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(09)63014-7. ISBN   9780123745361. PMID   19892174.
  62. ↑ Hink, W. F. (1970-05-02). "Established Insect Cell Line from the Cabbage Looper, Trichoplusia ni". Nature. 226 (5244): 466–467. Bibcode:1970Natur.226..466H. doi:10.1038/226466b0. PMID   16057320. S2CID   4225642.
  63. ↑ Zheng G-L, Zhou H-X, Li C-Y. 2014. Serum-free culture of the suspension cell line QB-Tn9-4s of the cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni, is highly productive for virus replication and recombinant protein expression. Journal of Insect Science 14:24. Available online: http://www.insectscience.org/14.24
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.