Conjugate beam method

Last updated
(0) real beam, (1) shear and moment, (2) conjugate beam, (3) slope and displacement Elastic load method (full).png
(0) real beam, (1) shear and moment, (2) conjugate beam, (3) slope and displacement

The conjugate-beam methods is an engineering method to derive the slope and displacement of a beam. A conjugate beam is defined as an imaginary beam with the same dimensions (length) as that of the original beam but load at any point on the conjugate beam is equal to the bending moment at that point divided by EI. [1]

Contents

The conjugate-beam method was developed by Heinrich Müller-Breslau in 1865. Essentially, it requires the same amount of computation as the moment-area theorems to determine a beam's slope or deflection; however, this method relies only on the principles of statics, so its application will be more familiar. [2]

The basis for the method comes from the similarity of Eq. 1 and Eq 2 to Eq 3 and Eq 4. To show this similarity, these equations are shown below.

Integrated, the equations look like this.

Here the shear V compares with the slope θ, the moment M compares with the displacement v, and the external load w compares with the M/EI diagram. Below is a shear, moment, and deflection diagram. A M/EI diagram is a moment diagram divided by the beam's Young's modulus and moment of inertia.

To make use of this comparison we will now consider a beam having the same length as the real beam, but referred here as the "conjugate beam." The conjugate beam is "loaded" with the M/EI diagram derived from the load on the real beam. From the above comparisons, we can state two theorems related to the conjugate beam: [2]

Theorem 1: The slope at a point in the real beam is numerically equal to the shear at the corresponding point in the conjugate beam.

Theorem 2: The displacement of a point in the real beam is numerically equal to the moment at the corresponding point in the conjugate beam. [2]

Conjugate-beam supports

When drawing the conjugate beam it is important that the shear and moment developed at the supports of the conjugate beam account for the corresponding slope and displacement of the real beam at its supports, a consequence of Theorems 1 and 2. For example, as shown below, a pin or roller support at the end of the real beam provides zero displacement, but a non zero slope. Consequently, from Theorems 1 and 2, the conjugate beam must be supported by a pin or a roller, since this support has zero moment but has a shear or end reaction. When the real beam is fixed supported, both the slope and displacement are zero. Here the conjugate beam has a free end, since at this end there is zero shear and zero moment. Corresponding real and conjugate supports are shown below. Note that, as a rule, neglecting axial forces, statically determinate real beams have statically determinate conjugate beams; and statically indeterminate real beams have unstable conjugate beams. Although this occurs, the M/EI loading will provide the necessary "equilibrium" to hold the conjugate beam stable. [2]

Real support vs Conjugate support [3]
Real beamConjugate beam
Fixed support Fixed support.svg Free end Free end.svg
Free end Free end.svg Fixed support Fixed support.svg
Hinged support Hinged support.svg Hinged support Hinged support.svg
Middle support Middle support.svg Middle hinge Middle hinge.svg
  • :continue
  • :continue
Middle hinge Middle hinge.svg Middle support Middle support.svg
  • :continue
  • :discontinue
  • :continue
  • :discontinue
Examples of conjugate beam [3]
Real beamConjugate beam
Simple beam Simple beam.svg Simple beam.svg
Cantilever beam Cantilever beam (left supported).svg Cantilever beam (right supported).svg
Left-end Overhanging beam Left end overhanging beam.svg Fixed-hinge-support beam.svg
Both-end overhanging beam Both end overhanging beam.svg Both end fixed and 2 middle hinged beam.svg
Gerber's beam (2 span) 2 spans Gerber's beam (left hinged).svg 2 spans Gerber's beam (right hinged).svg
Gerber's beam (3 span) 3 spans Gerber's beam (support-support-hinge).svg 3 spans Gerber's beam (support-hinge-support).svg

Procedure for analysis

The following procedure provides a method that may be used to determine the displacement and deflection at a point on the elastic curve of a beam using the conjugate-beam method.

Conjugate beam

Equilibrium

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Slope</span> Mathematical term

In mathematics, the slope or gradient of a line is a number that describes both the direction and the steepness of the line. Slope is often denoted by the letter m; there is no clear answer to the question why the letter m is used for slope, but its earliest use in English appears in O'Brien (1844) who wrote the equation of a straight line as "y = mx + b" and it can also be found in Todhunter (1888) who wrote it as "y = mx + c".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Free body diagram</span> Diagram showing applied forces and moments on a physical body

In physics and engineering, a free body diagram is a graphical illustration used to visualize the applied forces, moments, and resulting reactions on a body in a given condition. It depicts a body or connected bodies with all the applied forces and moments, and reactions, which act on the body(ies). The body may consist of multiple internal members, or be a compact body. A series of free bodies and other diagrams may be necessary to solve complex problems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Beam (structure)</span> Structural element capable of withstanding loads by resisting bending

A beam is a structural element that primarily resists loads applied laterally to the beam's axis. Its mode of deflection is primarily by bending. The loads applied to the beam result in reaction forces at the beam's support points. The total effect of all the forces acting on the beam is to produce shear forces and bending moments within the beams, that in turn induce internal stresses, strains and deflections of the beam. Beams are characterized by their manner of support, profile, equilibrium conditions, length, and their material.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Buckling</span> Sudden change in shape of a structural component under load

In structural engineering, buckling is the sudden change in shape (deformation) of a structural component under load, such as the bowing of a column under compression or the wrinkling of a plate under shear. If a structure is subjected to a gradually increasing load, when the load reaches a critical level, a member may suddenly change shape and the structure and component is said to have buckled. Euler's critical load and Johnson's parabolic formula are used to determine the buckling stress of a column.

In statics and structural mechanics, a structure is statically indeterminate when the static equilibrium equations – force and moment equilibrium conditions – are insufficient for determining the internal forces and reactions on that structure.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bending</span> Strain caused by an external load

In applied mechanics, bending characterizes the behavior of a slender structural element subjected to an external load applied perpendicularly to a longitudinal axis of the element.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Euler–Bernoulli beam theory</span> Method for load calculation in construction

Euler–Bernoulli beam theory is a simplification of the linear theory of elasticity which provides a means of calculating the load-carrying and deflection characteristics of beams. It covers the case corresponding to small deflections of a beam that is subjected to lateral loads only. By ignoring the effects of shear deformation and rotatory inertia, it is thus a special case of Timoshenko–Ehrenfest beam theory. It was first enunciated circa 1750, but was not applied on a large scale until the development of the Eiffel Tower and the Ferris wheel in the late 19th century. Following these successful demonstrations, it quickly became a cornerstone of engineering and an enabler of the Second Industrial Revolution.

This is an alphabetical list of articles pertaining specifically to structural engineering. For a broad overview of engineering, please see List of engineering topics. For biographies please see List of engineers.

Structural dynamics is a type of structural analysis which covers the behavior of a structure subjected to dynamic loading. Dynamic loads include people, wind, waves, traffic, earthquakes, and blasts. Any structure can be subjected to dynamic loading. Dynamic analysis can be used to find dynamic displacements, time history, and modal analysis.

The moment distribution method is a structural analysis method for statically indeterminate beams and frames developed by Hardy Cross. It was published in 1930 in an ASCE journal. The method only accounts for flexural effects and ignores axial and shear effects. From the 1930s until computers began to be widely used in the design and analysis of structures, the moment distribution method was the most widely practiced method.

The slope deflection method is a structural analysis method for beams and frames introduced in 1914 by George A. Maney. The slope deflection method was widely used for more than a decade until the moment distribution method was developed. In the book, "The Theory and Practice of Modern Framed Structures", written by J.B Johnson, C.W. Bryan and F.E. Turneaure, it is stated that this method was first developed "by Professor Otto Mohr in Germany, and later developed independently by Professor G.A. Maney". According to this book, professor Otto Mohr introduced this method for the first time in his book, "Evaluation of Trusses with Rigid Node Connections" or "Die Berechnung der Fachwerke mit Starren Knotenverbindungen".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Timoshenko–Ehrenfest beam theory</span> Model of shear deformation and bending effects

The Timoshenko–Ehrenfest beam theory was developed by Stephen Timoshenko and Paul Ehrenfest early in the 20th century. The model takes into account shear deformation and rotational bending effects, making it suitable for describing the behaviour of thick beams, sandwich composite beams, or beams subject to high-frequency excitation when the wavelength approaches the thickness of the beam. The resulting equation is of 4th order but, unlike Euler–Bernoulli beam theory, there is also a second-order partial derivative present. Physically, taking into account the added mechanisms of deformation effectively lowers the stiffness of the beam, while the result is a larger deflection under a static load and lower predicted eigenfrequencies for a given set of boundary conditions. The latter effect is more noticeable for higher frequencies as the wavelength becomes shorter, and thus the distance between opposing shear forces decreases.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Direct integration of a beam</span>

Direct integration is a structural analysis method for measuring internal shear, internal moment, rotation, and deflection of a beam.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Influence line</span>

In engineering, an influence line graphs the variation of a function at a specific point on a beam or truss caused by a unit load placed at any point along the structure. Common functions studied with influence lines include reactions, shear, moment, and deflection (Deformation). Influence lines are important in designing beams and trusses used in bridges, crane rails, conveyor belts, floor girders, and other structures where loads will move along their span. The influence lines show where a load will create the maximum effect for any of the functions studied.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shear and moment diagram</span> Structural design tool

Shear force and bending moment diagrams are analytical tools used in conjunction with structural analysis to help perform structural design by determining the value of shear forces and bending moments at a given point of a structural element such as a beam. These diagrams can be used to easily determine the type, size, and material of a member in a structure so that a given set of loads can be supported without structural failure. Another application of shear and moment diagrams is that the deflection of a beam can be easily determined using either the moment area method or the conjugate beam method.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deflection (engineering)</span> Degree to which part of a structural element is displaced under a given load

In structural engineering, deflection is the degree to which a part of a long structural element is deformed laterally under a load. It may be quantified in terms of an angle or a distance . A longitudinal deformation is called elongation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Structural engineering theory</span>

Structural engineering depends upon a detailed knowledge of loads, physics and materials to understand and predict how structures support and resist self-weight and imposed loads. To apply the knowledge successfully structural engineers will need a detailed knowledge of mathematics and of relevant empirical and theoretical design codes. They will also need to know about the corrosion resistance of the materials and structures, especially when those structures are exposed to the external environment.

In civil engineering and structural analysis Clapeyron's theorem of three moments is a relationship among the bending moments at three consecutive supports of a horizontal beam.

The Müller-Breslau principle is a method to determine influence lines. The principle states that the influence lines of an action assumes the scaled form of the deflection displacement. OR, This principle states that "ordinate of ILD for a reactive force is given by ordinate of elastic curve if a unit deflection is applied in the direction of reactive force."

The moment-area theorem is an engineering tool to derive the slope, rotation and deflection of beams and frames. This theorem was developed by Mohr and later stated namely by Charles Ezra Greene in 1873. This method is advantageous when we solve problems involving beams, especially for those subjected to a series of concentrated loadings or having segments with different moments of inertia.

References

  1. Bansal, R. K. (2010). Strength of materials. ISBN   9788131808146 . Retrieved 20 November 2014.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Hibbeler, R.C. (2009). Structural Analysis . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. pp.  328–335. ISBN   9780136020608.
  3. 1 2 Okmamura (1988)、p.171。