Demand-responsive transport

Last updated
Demand-responsive bus service of the Oxford Bus Company in 2018 Mercedes-Benz SprinterCity BU18 YRO Oxford FrideswideSq.jpg
Demand-responsive bus service of the Oxford Bus Company in 2018

Demand-responsive transport (DRT), also known as demand-responsive transit, demand-responsive service, [1] Dial-a-Ride [2] transit (sometimes DART), [3] flexible transport services, [4] Microtransit, [5] Non-Emergency Medical Transport (NEMT), [5] Carpool [6] or On-demand bus service is a form of shared private or quasi-public transport for groups traveling where vehicles alter their routes each journey based on particular transport demand without using a fixed route or timetabled journeys. [7] These vehicles typically pick-up and drop-off passengers in locations according to passengers needs and can include taxis, buses or other vehicles. [8] [9] Passengers can typically summon the service with a mobile phone app or by telephone; telephone is particularly relevant to older users who may not be conversant with technology. [10]

Contents

One of the most widespread types of demand-responsive transport (DRT) is to provide a public transport service in areas of low passenger demand where a regular bus service is not considered to be financially viable, such as rural and peri-urban areas. [11] Services may also be provided for particular types of passengers. One example is the paratransit programs for people with a disability. The provision of public transport in this manner emphasises one of its functions as a social service rather than creating a viable movement network. [12] [13] [14]

Definition

DRT and other kinds of transport DRT-define among others types of transport.svg
DRT and other kinds of transport

DRT can be used to refer to many different types of transport. When taxicabs were first introduced to many cities, they were hailed as an innovative form of DRT. They are still referred to as DRT in some jurisdictions around the world as their very nature is to take people from point-to-point based on their needs. [15] [16] [7]

More recently, DRT generally refers to a type of public transport. They are distinct from fixed-route services as they do not always operate to a specific timetable or route. [17] While specific operations vary widely, generally a particular area is designated for service by DRT. Once a certain number of people have requested a trip, the most efficient route will then be calculated depending on the origins and destinations of passengers.

Share taxis are another form of DRT. They are usually operated on an ad hoc basis but also do not have fixed routes or times and change their route and frequency depending on demand. [18]

Some DRT systems operate as a service that can deviate from a fixed route. These operate along a fixed alignment or path at specific times but may deviate to collect or drop off passengers who have requested the deviation. [1] [19]

Comparison of demand-responsiveness by type

Shared vehicle

Shared journey

  • highly flexible route, highly flexible schedule, mobile booking – microtransit
  • some degree of flexible route or schedule, no booking – share taxi/taxibus
  • some degree of flexible route or schedule, booking – paratransit
  • fixed route and fixed schedule, no booking – public transport

Operation

DRT services are restricted to a defined operating zone, within which journeys must start and finish. Journeys may be completely free form, or following skeleton routes and schedules, [11] varied as required, with users given a specified pick-up point and a time window for collection. [11] Some DRT systems may have defined termini, at one or both ends of a route, such as an urban centre, airport or transport interchange, for onward connections.

DRT systems require passengers to request a journey in advance. They may do this by booking with a central dispatcher [11] [17] who determines the journey options available given the user's location and destination. Increasingly, the booking is via an app, which provides the interface to software that creates a schedule in real time; adjusting the schedule to accept (or reject) bookings as they come in. This provides an instant decision for the potential user, but at the cost of efficiency: each individual travel need is considered individually, potentially resulting in higher levels of idle time (when the schedule has gaps that are too short to allow an additional journey to be added) and "dead mileage" (driving empty between one drop-off and the next pickup) than might be expected from a schedule built by an experienced human operator.

DRT systems take advantage of fleet telematics technology in the form of vehicle location systems, scheduling and dispatching software and hand-held/in vehicle computing. [11] [20]

Vehicles used for DRT services are typically small minibuses sufficient for low ridership, which allow the service to provide as near a door-to-door service as practical by using narrower residential streets. [11] In some cases taxicabs are hired by the DRT provider to serve their routes on request.

DRT schemes may be fully or partially funded by the local transit authority, with operators selected by public tendering or other methods. Other schemes may be partially or fully self-funded as community centred not for profit social enterprises (such as a community interest company in the UK). They may also be provided by private companies for commercial reasons; some conventional bus operating companies have set up DRT-style airport bus services, which compete with larger private hire airport shuttle companies.[ citation needed ]

Health and environmental effects

DRT can potentially reduce the number of vehicles on the road, and hence pollution and congestion, if many people are persuaded to use it instead of private cars or taxis. [10]

For a model of a hypothetical large-scale demand-responsive public transport system for the Helsinki metropolitan area, simulation results published in 2005 demonstrated that "in an urban area with one million inhabitants, trip aggregation could reduce the health, environmental, and other detrimental impacts of car traffic typically by 50–70%, and if implemented could attract about half of the car passengers, and within a broad operational range would require no public subsidies". [21]

Licensing

DRT schemes may require new or amended legislation, or special dispensation, to operate, as they do not meet the traditional licensing model of authorised bus transport providers or licensed taxicab operators. The status has caused controversy between bus and taxi operators when the DRT service picks up passengers without pre-booking, due to the licensing issues. [22] [23] Issues may also arise surrounding tax and fuel subsidy for DRT services.

Effectiveness

Ridership on DRT services is usually quite low (less than ten passengers per hour), but DRT can provide coverage effectively. [24] [25]

Analysis of the Yorbus DRT scheme in a rural area of the UK showed very little combination of individual travel needs. Of the 35% of operating hours when the vehicles were carrying passengers, there was just one passenger (or a couple travelling together) for 74% of the time, and two passengers (or couples travelling together) for a further 20% of the time. The 15-seat minibuses could have been replaced by small taxis without capacity problems for 97% of the operating hours. [26]


List of current DRT systems by country

Since the mid-2010s several DRT projects started up but failed.

In the US several DRT operators appeared and promptly failed, due to either lack of customers or health and safety issues. 2019 trials in London found that "satisfaction was really high"; users scored the service at 4.8/5 and praised ease of use, safety, cleanliness and accessibility. But low take-up, misunderstandings about who the service was for, and safety concerns about unlit stops—together with problems due to the covid pandemic from 2020—caused the trials to fail. [10]

Lukas Foljanty, a shared-mobility enthusiast and market expert, keeps track of the different DRT schemes around the world and thinks a tipping point may have been reached in 2022. There were at least 450 schemes around the world, and in 2021 fifty-four new projects started within a three-month period. [10]

David Carnero of Europe-wide DRT technology company Padam said that successful DRT requires subsidies, must be delivered at scale, and must be part of an integrated, rather than competitive, transport policy. [10]

Australia

Austria

Belgium

Canada

Czech Republic

Denmark

All 5 major Public Transit Authorities in Denmark provide door-to-door DRT services in different variants and degree.

Flextur is public transport, but with smaller vehicles that run on demand. Plustur is flexible transport that can be used in cases where the bus or train does not run all the way. Flexrute is public transport on demand - without a fixed timetable, which drives from stop to stop within a defined geographical area. There are also special needs school transport and paratransit services.

The DRT-services in Denmark are maintained as a collaboration between the PTAs in a joint venture, FlexDanmark, thus providing nation wide DRT-services (excluding some islands). There are three major operational areas:

Finland

There is paratransit service (palvelulinja, palveluliikenne) in many cities and municipalities in Finland. It is mainly aimed at those who find it difficult to use other public transport, but often anyone who wants to can order a trip.

Germany

Hong Kong

Red minibuses which serve non-franchised routes across the country, depending on routes, allow passengers to reserve their seats by phone such that operators and drivers are able to know where passengers are and how many there are in deploying their vehicles. [59] [60]

Iceland

Public transport authority in the Icelandic capital of Reykjavik and the surrounding municipalities. Manages public bus transport and disabled transport, but does not have its own vehicles. About 1,300 enquiries and thousand trips a day. Uses 60 vehicles and 10–20 more for school transport for children with special needs. [61]

Ireland

A network of over 1,000 demand responsive transport routes are provided across rural Ireland under the TFI Local Link brand. Many of these routes are once a week services which operate a door-to-door pickup from a rural area into a nearby large town, where people can access shopping and other services, followed by a return service a few hours later with a door-to-door drop off back to the same rural area. Other routes include daily return services to/from colleges or employment centres, weekend evening services to/from a night-time activity centre, weekly services to attend Mass, feeder services to connect with scheduled bus and train services, and services on off-shore islands to connect with ferry departures and arrivals. [62]

Services are managed by 15 regional TFI Local Link offices across the country on behalf of the National Transport Authority (NTA), and usually require prebooking by phoning the relevant office in advance. As of June 2023, there are no real-time app-based demand responsive transport services operating in Ireland, but in April 2023 the NTA informed suppliers that they intended "to procure a trial of and, if successful a roll out of, Smart Demand Responsive Transport services (SDRT), using app based products to secure services and routing algorithms to match vehicles with capacity to users". [63]

Italy

Following some pioneering DRT schemes implemented in the 1980s, a second wave of systems were launched from the mid-1990s. There are now DRT schemes in urban and peri-urban areas as well as in rural communities. Operated by both public transport companies and private service providers, the DRT schemes are offered either as intermediate collective transport services for generic users or as schemes for specific user groups. DRT schemes operate in major cities including Rome, Milan, Genoa, Florence, and in several mid- to small-size towns including Alessandria, Aosta, Cremona, Livorno, Mantova, Parma, Empoli, Siena, and Sarzana.

Japan

More than 200 of the 1,700 local governments in Japan have introduced DRT public transport services.

Luxembourg

Netherlands

New Zealand

Poland

The first ever demand-responsive transport scheme in Poland – called Tele-Bus – has been operated since 2007 in Kraków by MPK, the local public transport company (see also Tramways in Kraków). [68] [69]

Russia

Sweden

Regional transport authority in Västra Götaland in southwestern Sweden is responsible for all public transport and for transport offers to citizens with special needs. This is an example of DRT used for people with special needs (paratransit). [75]

Switzerland

DRT services have operated in some sparsely populated areas (under 100 p/km2) since 1995. PostBus Switzerland Ltd, the national post company, has operated a DRT service called PubliCar, formerly also Casa Car. [76]

United Kingdom

Some DRT schemes were operating under the UK bus-operating regulations of 1986, allowed by having core start and finish points and a published schedule. [77] Regulations concerning bus service registration and application of bus-operating grants for England and Wales were amended in 2004 to allow registration of fully flexible pre-booked DRT services. [77] Some services, such as LinkUp, only pick up passengers at 'meeting points', but can set down at the passenger's destination.

The Greenwich Association of the Disabled had earlier developed a prototype service, GAD-About, which offered pre-booked door-to-door transport for its members, inspired by similar minibus usage in church and youth clubs. That was then cloned as an easily scalable module, under the aegis of London Transport, to become the Dial-a-Ride service launched as part the general services of Transport for London (TfL), rather than as a bus service.

Examples of UK schemes include:

United States

Dial-a-Ride in New Jersey, 1974 PASSENGER PAYING FARE AFTER BOARDING A DIAL A RIDE RADIO DISPATCHED DOOR-TO-DOOR BUS SERVICE AT HER HOME IN... - NARA - 556739.jpg
Dial-a-Ride in New Jersey, 1974
Minibuses operating on SafeRides, an overnight demand-responsive service operated by the Champaign-Urbana Mass Transit District in Champaign and Urbana, Illinois CUMTD Ford E-450 1801+1418 SafeRides.jpg
Minibuses operating on SafeRides, an overnight demand-responsive service operated by the Champaign-Urbana Mass Transit District in Champaign and Urbana, Illinois

The large majority of 1,500 rural systems in the US provide demand-response service; there are also about 400 urban DRT systems. [81] In addition to these, the United States also operates Non-Emergency Medical Transportation (NEMT) Programs. These programs ensure access to healthcare for individuals with mobility challenges or those in underserved areas by providing transportation to medical appointments and essential healthcare services. [82]

California

Colorado

Florida

As of 2022, at least 30 transit agencies in Florida have demand-response trips. [84]

Georgia

Illinois

Maryland

New Jersey

New York

North Carolina

Pennsylvania

South Carolina

Tennessee

Texas

Utah

Virginia

Washington State

Washington, D.C.


See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dallas Area Rapid Transit</span> American transit agency

Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) is a transit agency serving the Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex of Texas. It operates buses, light rail, commuter rail, and high-occupancy vehicle lanes in Dallas and twelve of its suburbs. In 2023, the system had a ridership of 50,463,300, or about 166,900 per weekday as of the fourth quarter of 2023.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carpool</span> Sharing of car journeys so that more than one person travels in a car

Carpooling is the sharing of car journeys so that more than one person travels in a car, and prevents the need for others to have to drive to a location themselves. Carpooling is considered a Demand-Responsive Transport (DRT) service

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vehicle for hire</span> Vehicle providing transport for a fee

A vehicle for hire is a vehicle providing private transport or shared transport for a fee, in which passengers are generally free to choose their points or approximate points of origin and destination, unlike public transport, and which they do not drive themselves, as in car rental and carsharing. They may be offered via a ridesharing company.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Share taxi</span> Mode of transport which falls between both taxicabs and buses

A share taxi is a mode of transport which falls between a taxicab and a bus. These vehicles for hire are typically smaller than buses and usually take passengers on a fixed or semi-fixed route without timetables, but instead departing when all seats are filled. They may stop anywhere to pick up or drop off their passengers. Often found in developing countries, the vehicles used as share taxis range from four-seat cars to minibuses. They are often owner-operated.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paratransit</span> Transportation service for people with disabilities

Paratransit or Intermediate Public Transport, is a type of transportation services that supplement fixed-route mass transit by providing individualized rides without fixed routes or timetables. Paratransit services may vary considerably on the degree of flexibility they provide their customers. At their simplest they may consist of a taxi or small bus that will run along a more or less defined route and then stop to pick up or discharge passengers on request. At the other end of the spectrum—fully demand responsive transport—the most flexible paratransit systems offer on-demand call-up door-to-door service from any origin to any destination in a service area. In addition to public transit agencies, paratransit services may be operated by community groups or not-for-profit organizations, and for-profit private companies or operators.

<i>Marshrutka</i> Fixed-route taxicab

Marshrutnoye taksi, commonly known by the colloquialism Marshrutka, are share taxis found in Eastern Europe and the republics of the former Soviet Union. Usually vans, they drive along set routes, depart only when all seats are filled, and may have higher fares than buses. Passengers can board a marshrutka anywhere along its route if there are seats available.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rhode Island Public Transit Authority</span> Public transport agency in Rhode Island, US

The Rhode Island Public Transit Authority (RIPTA) provides public transportation, primarily buses, in the state of Rhode Island. The main hub of the RIPTA system is Kennedy Plaza, a large bus terminal in downtown Providence, Rhode Island. Average daily ridership as of the fourth quarter of 2023 is 41,800. The agency operates 59 fixed-route bus routes and 7 demand-responsive routes, together serving 37 out of 39 Rhode Island municipalities.

The Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority (SORTA) is the public transport agency serving Cincinnati and its Ohio suburbs. SORTA operates Metro fixed-route buses, bus rapid transit, microtransit, and paratransit services. SORTA's headquarters are located at the Huntington Building in Cincinnati’s Central Business District. The agency is managed by CEO and General Manager Darryl Haley along with a 13-member board of trustees. In 2023, the system had a ridership of 13,091,500, or about 44,800 per weekday as of the fourth quarter of 2023.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chapel Hill Transit</span>

Chapel Hill Transit operates public bus and van transportation services within the contiguous municipalities of Chapel Hill and Carrboro and the campus of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the southeast corner of Orange County in the Research Triangle metropolitan region of North Carolina. Chapel Hill Transit operates its fixed route system fare free due to a contractual agreement with the two towns and the university to share annual operating and capital costs. In 2023, the system had a ridership of 3,855,400, or about 16,600 per weekday as of the fourth quarter of 2023.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marin Transit</span> Public bus agency in California, US

Marin Transit is a public bus agency in Marin County, California, in the United States. Originally formed in 1964 as Marin County Transit District (MCTD). Marin Transit was re-branded on 30 July 2007 and now provides a variety of fixed-route and demand-response services using contractors. In 2023, the system had a ridership of 2,814,700, or about 8,800 per weekday as of the fourth quarter of 2023.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Airport bus</span> Transport to, from or within airports

An airport bus, or airport shuttle bus or airport shuttle or Shuttle Bus is a bus used to transport people to and from, or within airports. These vehicles will usually be equipped with larger luggage space, and incorporate special branding. They are also commonly painted with bright colours to stand out among other airport vehicles and to be easily seen by the crews of taxiing aircraft when negotiating the aprons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Telebus</span>

A Telebus, Dial-a-bus, or Dial-a-ride service is a bus service that operates in a mode partway between a normal scheduled bus service and a taxi; it is a form of demand responsive transport. Telebuses typically have a scheduled route, but passengers can ring and book a pick-up within an area served by the route, and the bus route is modified to make the pick-up. Drop offs anywhere within the area can also be accommodated. The aim is to extend public transport services to the front door of all residences, or from any place to any place.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shared transport</span> Demand-driven vehicle-sharing arrangement

Shared transport or shared mobility is a transportation system where travelers share a vehicle either simultaneously as a group or over time as personal rental, and in the process share the cost of the journey, thus purportedly creating a hybrid between private vehicle use and mass or public transport. It is a transportation strategy that allows users to access transportation services on an as-needed basis. Shared mobility is an umbrella term that encompasses a variety of transportation modes including carsharing, Bicycle-sharing systems, ridesharing companies, carpools, and microtransit.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public transport</span> Shared transportation service for use by the general public

Public transport is a system of transport for passengers by group travel systems available for use by the general public unlike private transport, typically managed on a schedule, operated on established routes, and that may charge a posted fee for each trip. There is no rigid definition of which kinds of transport are included, and air travel is often not thought of when discussing public transport—dictionaries use wording like "buses, trains, etc." Examples of public transport include city buses, trolleybuses, trams and passenger trains, rapid transit and ferries. Public transport between cities is dominated by airlines, coaches, and intercity rail. High-speed rail networks are being developed in many parts of the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public light bus</span> Minibus used for public transport services in Hong Kong

The public light bus (PLB) or minibus is a public transport service in Hong Kong. It uses minibuses to provide quicker transport and to serve areas that standard Hong Kong bus lines cannot reach as efficiently. The vehicles are colloquially known by the code-switch Van仔.

BRIDJ is a SaaS platform designed to support ‘demand responsive’ or ‘on demand’ public transport providers. The platform allows a user to optimise an on-road service and digitise work processes, and includes an optimisation engine, traveller app, driver app and client portal. The traveller app allows passengers to book, pay and track a service between two locations within a service area. The optimisation engine consumes pre-planned and real-time bookings and then allocates passengers to the available vehicles to create the optimal trips for the given service objectives. The optimisation engine is designed to handle large numbers of passengers and vehicles of both small capacities and high capacity (6-50+). BRIDJ technology is currently deployed on public transport services in both Sydney and Adelaide, Australia and for transfer services Singapore.  

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Via Transportation</span> Real-time ridesharing company

Via Transportation, Inc. provides software as a service (SaaS) and mobility as a service to operators of public transportation, multimodal transport, paratransit operations in compliance with laws such as the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, non-emergency medical transportation, logistics and deliveries, school bus fleets, commercial ridesharing and corporate shuttles, and autonomous vehicles. Its customers include cities, transportation authorities, government entities, school districts, universities, and private organizations worldwide. It was founded in 2012 and is headquartered in New York City.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Microtransit</span> Form of demand-responsive transport with no fixed routes or schedules

Microtransit is a form of bus demand responsive transport vehicle for hire. This transit service offers a highly flexible routing and/or highly flexible scheduling of minibus vehicles shared with other passengers. Microtransit providers build routes ad-hoc exclusively to match only each demand (trip) and supply and to extend the efficiency and accessibility of the transit service. Possible pick-up/drop-off stops are restricted, and transit can be provided as a stop-to-stop service or a curb-to-curb service.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fflecsi</span> Demand-responsive bus service in Wales

Fflecsi is a trial demand-responsive bus service administered by Transport for Wales (TfW) and local authorities, operated by local bus operators across Wales. Pilot trials of the service are conducted across Wales, which included a city-wide trial in Newport until September 2022. The effectiveness of the service is being monitored as full bus services resume in Wales during the COVID-19 pandemic. During the pilots, fflecsi will replace some pre-existing scheduled bus routes in the service areas where it operates. The technology behind the service is made by ViaVan, and the pilot is funded by the Welsh Government, to invest in new approaches to public transport in Wales as part of their Llwybr Newydd strategy. The pilot was included in Welsh Labour's manifesto for the 2021 Senedd election, as part of their plan to increase investment in bus services, and reducing Wales' carbon emissions.

Buses play a major role in the public transport of Malaysia, as well as seeing extensive private use. While rail transport has increased over the recent years due to road congestion, the same does not apply to buses, which have generally been used less in most of the area.

References

  1. 1 2 NTD Glossary Archived 2013-11-13 at the Wayback Machine US National Transit Database
  2. "Dial-a-Ride". Transport for London. Retrieved 11 August 2022.
  3. "DART (Dial-A-Ride Transit) Service". King County Metro Transit. Retrieved 11 August 2022.
  4. CONNECT is a Coordination Action in the Sustainable Development Thematic Area of the European Union's 6th Framework Program, successfully ended on December 2005.
  5. 1 2 What is Demand-Responsive Transport?
  6. ioki.com - what-is-demand-responsive-transport (2023-06-26). "What is … demand-responsive transport (DRT)?". ioki. Retrieved 2023-11-23.
  7. 1 2 "What is Demand-Responsive Transport?" (PDF). Transport for Communities. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 January 2019. Retrieved 7 January 2019.
  8. Synopsis of DRT Archived 2010-06-20 at the Wayback Machine European Commission Directorate-General for Energy and Transport
  9. Brake, Jenny; Nelson, John D.; Wright, Steve (December 2004). "Demand responsive transport: towards the emergence of a new market segment". Journal of Transport Geography. 12 (4): 323–337. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.08.011.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 Laker, Laura (11 August 2022). "All aboard! How on‑demand public transport is getting back on the road". The Guardian.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 www.drtbus.co.uk Archived 2008-03-19 at the Wayback Machine What is DRT?
  12. "Social benefits of buses: valuing the social impacts". GOV.UK. Retrieved 7 January 2019.
  13. "Integrated Public Transport Service Planning Guidelines" (PDF). Transport for New South Wales. Retrieved 7 January 2019.
  14. Mees, Paul (2000). A very public solution : transport in the dispersed city. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press. ISBN   9780522848670.
  15. "Demand Responsive Transport (DRT)". Stirling Council. Retrieved 7 January 2019.
  16. "On-demand Transport: A discussion paper for future innovation" (PDF). transport.wa.gov.au. The Government of Western Australia. Retrieved 7 January 2019.
  17. 1 2 3 4 5 Demand-Response Transit Service Archived 2008-09-24 at the Wayback Machine The Central Federal Lands Highway Division, US department of Transportation
  18. Grava, Sigurd (September 2002). Urban transportation systems : choices for communities. McGraw-Hill. ISBN   9780071384179.
  19. "Telebuses". ptv.vic.gov.au. Public Transport Victoria. Retrieved 7 January 2019.
  20. "Using smart technologies to revitalize demand responsive transport". Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems. 1 (3): 275–293. 1994.
  21. Jouni T Tuomisto, Marko Tainio: An economic way of reducing health, environmental, and other pressures of urban traffic: a decision analysis on trip aggregation , BioMed Central, November 25, 2005
  22. Shuttle faces probe into 'illegal fares' Archived 2007-11-02 at the Wayback Machine Edinburgh Evening News, 13 September 2007
  23. Row over Edinburgh Airport shuttle service Archived 2007-12-24 at the Wayback Machine UK-Airport-News.info, 15 October 2007
  24. A Guide for Planning and Operating Flexible Public Transportation Services
  25. Human Transit: Can a "flexible route" solve the problem of low ridership due to low density? Archived 2015-09-06 at the Wayback Machine
  26. Geddes, John. "Review of Yorbus operating data, Feb-Apr 2022". DRT Questions. John Geddes. Retrieved 24 February 2023.
  27. "CoastConnect". Transport for NSW. Community Transport Central Coast Limited. Archived from the original on 26 June 2019. Retrieved 28 October 2019.
  28. "qconnect Hervey Bay Kango Timetable" (PDF). Queensland Department of Main Roads and Transport. Qconnect. Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 March 2017. Retrieved 17 January 2019.
  29. "Kan-go Toowoomba". Translink. State of Queensland. Archived from the original on 17 January 2019. Retrieved 17 January 2019.
  30. SmartLink Archived 2008-09-29 at the Wayback Machine Community Transport by Great Community Transport
  31. "SkyBus – SkyBus Link – Free city hotel shuttle". Skybus. Retrieved 17 January 2019.
  32. "Telebuses". ptv.vic.gov.au. Public Transport Victoria. Retrieved 17 January 2019.
  33. Wang, Fei. "MEETING OLDER PERSONS' MOBILITY AND ACCESS NEEDS – A RE-THINK ON PUBLIC TRANSPORT" (PDF). Department of Infrastructure, Victoria. Retrieved 17 January 2019.
  34. Victoria, Public Transport. "On-demand bus service FlexiRide expands to Chirnside Park, Lilydale, Mooroolbark and Croydon". Public Transport Victoria. Retrieved 2023-01-03.
  35. "Gemeinde Rainbach im Mühlkreis, Gemeinde Informationen für Einwohner – Fahrpläne". rainbach.at. Retrieved 17 January 2019.
  36. "W³ shuttle". Archived from the original on 2020-08-11.
  37. "How Belleville, Ont., is using technology to tackle transit troubles". CBC. Retrieved 17 January 2019.
  38. "Pantonium On-Demand Transit". btletsgo.ca. Retrieved 17 January 2019.
  39. "Cobourg's On-Demand Bus Service". Archived from the original on 2021-03-30.
  40. "On Demand Transit | City of Edmonton".
  41. "RideCo blog – Launch five new services in 2 weeks". June 2021. Archived from the original on 2021-06-02.
  42. "TransCab Service". City of Niagara Falls. Retrieved 2021-01-31.
  43. "About WT On-Request". Winnipeg Transit. Retrieved 12 August 2021.
  44. "RadioBUS". audis.cz. Audis Bus. Archived from the original on 27 May 2016. Retrieved 17 January 2019.
  45. "Dispeink hromadn dopravy". hromadnadoprava.cz. DHD.
  46. "Vippari-joukkoliikenne". 25 May 2022.
  47. "Kyläkyyti".
  48. "R-kyyti".
  49. "Shuttle service makes it snappy". Smart Cities World. 2 February 2018. Retrieved 17 January 2019.
  50. "Braunschweiger Verkehrs-GmbH – Anruflinien-Taxi". verkehr-bs.de. Retrieved 17 January 2019.
  51. "AnrufLinienFahrt (ALF) – anrufen oder online buchen und wir kommen". mvg-online.de. MVG. Retrieved 17 January 2019.
  52. "Anruf-Linien-Bus Verkehrsgesellschaft Meißen" (in German). Retrieved 17 January 2019.
  53. "myBUS – jetzt mit gratis WLAN". dvg-duisburg.de (in German). DVG-Duisburger Verkehrsgesellschaft. Retrieved 17 January 2019.
  54. "Neu im Angebot: Anruf-Linienbus". Lausitzer Rundschau. LAUSITZER RUNDSCHAU. Retrieved 17 January 2019.
  55. ""freYfahrt": ÖPNV nach Bedarf und via Internet bestellbar – Wirtschaft-News" (in German). Süddeutsche.de. Archived from the original on 17 January 2019. Retrieved 17 January 2019.
  56. "Baxi TIR" (in German). Retrieved 26 September 2020.
  57. "Baxi NEW" (in German). Retrieved 26 September 2020.
  58. "Baxi SAD" (in German). Retrieved 26 September 2020.
  59. "RMB Route: Aberdeen – Shek Tong Tsui". 16seats.net. Retrieved 17 January 2019.
  60. "RMB Route: Sai Kung – Causeway Bay". 16seats.net. Retrieved 17 January 2019.
  61. "Case Study: Reykjavik and surrounding district". Trapeze. 2017. Archived from the original on 10 January 2017. Retrieved 28 April 2016.
  62. "TFI Local Link". July 2023.
  63. "Public RFT - Smart Demand Responsive Transport services PIN".
  64. "Drinbus: network and timetables" (in Italian). AZIENDA MOBILITA' E TRASPORTI SpA. Retrieved 11 August 2022.
  65. "Flexibus". Sales-Lentz. Retrieved 17 January 2019.
  66. Laura Ducoli, Lisa (8 March 2018). "Kussbus: Redefining the daily commute". luxtimes.lu. Luxembourg Times. Retrieved 17 January 2019.
  67. "MyWay by Metro - Timaru's on-demand public transport service" . Retrieved 3 January 2022.
  68. "MPK SA in Cracow / Tele-Bus". MPK. 28 May 2011. Archived from the original on 28 May 2011. Retrieved 17 January 2019.
  69. "Tele-Bus Kraków". Vimeo. MPK.
  70. "The On The Way mobility-on-demand service is launched in Moscow today - Moscow Transport Portal". transport.mos.ru. Retrieved 2022-01-26.
  71. 1 2 ""По пути"". i.transport.mos.ru. Retrieved 2022-01-26.
  72. "Что такое ТиНАО (расшифровка)?". Портал новой Москвы nmao.ru. Retrieved 2022-01-26.
  73. "Префектура ТиНАО города Москвы". tinao.mos.ru. Archived from the original on 2020-03-28. Retrieved 2022-01-26.
  74. "ГУП "Мосгортранс": В ТиНАО увеличилась зона работы сервиса "По пути"". mosgortrans.ru. Retrieved 2022-01-26.
  75. "Multiple forms of transport in just one work-stream". trapezegroup.eu (in Swahili). Retrieved 17 January 2019.
  76. "PubliCar". postauto.ch. Retrieved 17 January 2019.
  77. 1 2 Registration of Flexible Local Bus Services and Related BSOG Regulations UK Department for Transport
  78. "The bus service of the future?". Kent Online. 2020-11-29. Retrieved 2022-08-20.
  79. "£1.5 million minibus service could face axe if users fail to rise". Watford Observer. 23 July 2022. Retrieved 2022-08-20.
  80. Grimsditch, Lee (2020-07-30). "Arriva Click say they will not be returning to Liverpool". Liverpool Echo. Retrieved 2022-08-20.
  81. Ellis, Elizabeth; McCollom, Brian (2009). Guidebook for Rural Demand-Response Transportation: Measuring, Assessing, and Improving Performance (PDF). document of The Transportation Research Board. p. 100. doi:10.17226/14330. ISBN   978-0-309-28022-8.
  82. Varghese, Nygel (2023-09-06). "History & Evolution of the NEMT Industry". Tobi Cloud. Retrieved 2024-03-15.
  83. "FlexRide".
  84. "Florida Transit Agencies". Plan For Transit. Retrieved 2023-12-06.
  85. "NSB Flex". votran.org. 2016-02-25. Retrieved 2021-01-31.
  86. Solodev (2018-02-06). "NeighborLink | Public Transportation Services for Orange, Se". golynx.com. Retrieved 2021-01-31.
  87. "SNAP » TAPS". taps.ufl.edu. Retrieved 2023-01-11.
  88. "Bay County uses grant to help pay bus, Uber fees for 'transportation disadvantaged' people". Panama City News Herald. Retrieved 2023-12-06.
  89. "Transit Department | Henry County, GA - Official Website".
  90. "Henry Connect Microtransit | Henry County, GA - Official Website".
  91. Wronski, Richard (4 November 2011). "Pace sees growth of Call-n-Ride shuttles". Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on 2015-08-22.
  92. "Ride On Flex". montgomerycountymd.gov. Retrieved 2019-06-06.
  93. Rivera, Marcus (2021-01-31). "System map – click on 2nd orange link". Archived from the original on 2015-06-22.
  94. "Evening Service". tarrivertransit.org. Retrieved 2021-01-31.
  95. "Cherokee NC Community Transit, Elderly & Handicap Transportation". cherokeetransit.com. Retrieved 2021-01-31.
  96. Rivera, Marcus (2021-01-31). "Mts webpage". Archived from the original on 2018-05-15.
  97. "Transportation – Trailblazer Routes". buncombecounty.org. Retrieved 2021-01-31.
  98. "Flex Connect". gomcta.com. Retrieved 2021-01-31.
  99. "Tel-A-Ride | CARTA". ridecarta.com. Retrieved 2019-06-06.
  100. "DART.org – GoLink". dart.org. Retrieved 2021-01-31.
  101. McKane, Scott (2022-08-08). "UTA expands 'on demand' service to Davis, Tooele counties". FOX 13 News Utah . Retrieved 2023-07-26.
  102. "GRTC CARE On-Demand | GRTC". ridegrtc.com. Retrieved 2022-01-03.
  103. "Zone Service". Whatcom Transportation Authority. Retrieved 2022-11-28.
  104. "Flex Service". Whatcom Transportation Authority. Retrieved 2022-11-28.
  105. "DART" . Retrieved 2019-06-06.
  106. "Access Transportation". King County Metro. May 31, 2019. Retrieved June 6, 2019.
  107. "Finley". Ben Franklin Transit. Archived from the original on June 16, 2012. Retrieved May 19, 2013.

[1]

  1. "Carpool", Wikipedia, 2023-11-17, retrieved 2023-11-23