Environmental DNA

Last updated

The longhorn beetle, Leptura quadrifasciata, is an example of a flower-visiting insect found in a study which showed that environmental DNA (eDNA) from arthropods is deposited on wild flowers after interactions Longhorn beetle Leptura quadrifasciata.jpg
The longhorn beetle, Leptura quadrifasciata, is an example of a flower‐visiting insect found in a study which showed that environmental DNA (eDNA) from arthropods is deposited on wild flowers after interactions 
Part of a series on
DNA barcoding
DNA Barcoding.png
 
DNA barcoding • Metabarcoding
 
By taxa
Other

Environmental DNA or eDNA is DNA that is collected from a variety of environmental samples such as soil, seawater, snow or air, rather than directly sampled from an individual organism. As various organisms interact with the environment, DNA is expelled and accumulates in their surroundings from various sources. [2] Such eDNA can be sequenced by environmental omics to reveal facts about the species that are present in an ecosystem — even microscopic ones not otherwise apparent or detectable.

Contents

In recent years, eDNA has been used as a tool to detect endangered wildlife that were otherwise unseen. In 2020, human health researchers began repurposing eDNA techniques to track the COVID-19 pandemic. [3]

Example sources of eDNA include, but are not limited to, feces, mucus, gametes, shed skin, carcasses and hair. [2] [4] Samples can be analyzed by high-throughput DNA sequencing methods, known as metagenomics, metabarcoding, and single-species detection, for rapid monitoring and measurement of biodiversity. In order to better differentiate between organisms within a sample, DNA metabarcoding is used in which the sample is analyzed and uses previously studied DNA libraries, such as BLAST, to determine what organisms are present. [5]

eDNA metabarcoding is a novel method of assessing biodiversity wherein samples are taken from the environment via water, sediment or air from which DNA is extracted, and then amplified using general or universal primers in polymerase chain reaction and sequenced using next-generation sequencing to generate thousands to millions of reads. From this data, species presence can be determined, and overall biodiversity assessed. It is an interdisciplinary method that brings together traditional field-based ecology with in-depth molecular methods and advanced computational tools. [6]

The analysis of eDNA has great potential, not only for monitoring common species, but to genetically detect and identify other extant species that could influence conservation efforts. [7] This method allows for biomonitoring without requiring collection of the living organism, creating the ability to study organisms that are invasive, elusive, or endangered without introducing anthropogenic stress on the organism. Access to this genetic information makes a critical contribution to the understanding of population size, species distribution, and population dynamics for species not well documented. Importantly, eDNA is often more cost-effective compared to traditional sampling methods. [8] The integrity of eDNA samples is dependent upon its preservation within the environment.

Soil, permafrost, freshwater and seawater are well-studied macro environments from which eDNA samples have been extracted, each of which include many more conditioned subenvironments. [9] Because of its versatility, eDNA is applied in many subenvironments such as freshwater sampling, seawater sampling, terrestrial soil sampling (tundra permafrost), aquatic soil sampling (river, lake, pond, and ocean sediment), [10] or other environments where normal sampling procedures can become problematic. [9]

On 7 December 2022, The New York Times reported that two-million year old eDNA genetic material was found in Greenland, and is currently considered the oldest DNA discovered so far. [11] [12]

Overview

Environmental DNA or eDNA describes the genetic material present in environmental samples such as sediment, water, and air, including whole cells, extracellular DNA and potentially whole organisms. [13] [14] The analyse of eDNA start with capturing an environmental sample of interest. The DNA in the sample is extracted and purified. The purified DNA is then amplified for a specific gene target so it can be sequenced and categorised based on its sequence. [15] From this information, detection and classification of species is possible. [6]

eDNA can come from skin, mucous, saliva, sperm, secretions, eggs, feces, urine, blood, roots, leaves, fruit, pollen, and rotting bodies of larger organisms, while microorganisms may be obtained in their entirety. [16] [7] [14] eDNA production is dependent on biomass, age and feeding activity of the organism as well as physiology, life history, and space use. [2] [17] [14] [18] [19] [6]

Despite being a relatively new method of surveying, eDNA has already proven to have enormous potential in biological monitoring. Conventional methods for surveying richness and abundance are limited by taxonomic identification, may cause disturbance or destruction of habitat, and may rely on methods in which it is difficult to detect small or elusive species, thus making estimates for entire communities impossible. eDNA can complement these methods by targeting different species, sampling greater diversity, and increasing taxonomic resolution. [20] Additionally, eDNA is capable of detecting rare species, [21] [17] but not of determining population quality information such as sex ratios and body conditions, so it is ideal for supplementing traditional studies. [18] [20] Regardless, it has useful applications in detecting the first occurrences of invasive species, the continued presence of native species thought to be extinct or otherwise threatened, and other elusive species occurring in low densities that would be difficult to detect by traditional means. [6]

Degradation of eDNA in the environment limits the scope of eDNA studies, as often only small segments of genetic material remain, particularly in warm, tropical regions. Additionally, the varying lengths of time to degradation based on environmental conditions and the potential of DNA to travel throughout media such as water can affect inference of fine-scale spatiotemporal trends of species and communities. [17] [22] [16] [23] [18] [20] [19] Despite these drawbacks, eDNA still has the potential to determine relative or rank abundance as some studies have found it to correspond with biomass, though the variation inherent in environmental samples makes it difficult to quantify. [7] [14] While eDNA has numerous applications in conservation, monitoring, and ecosystem assessment, as well as others yet to be described, the highly variable concentrations of eDNA and potential heterogeneity through the water body makes it essential that the procedure is optimized, ideally with a pilot study for each new application to ensure that the sampling design is appropriate to detect the target. [24] [18] [20] [6]

Community DNA

While the definition of eDNA seems straightforward, the lines between different forms of DNA become blurred, particularly in comparison to community DNA, which is described as bulk organismal samples. [20] A question arises regarding whole microorganisms captured in eDNA samples: do these organisms alter the classification of the sample to a community DNA sample? Additionally, the classification of genetic material from feces is problematic and often referred to as eDNA. [20] Differentiation between the two is important as community DNA indicates organismal presence at a particular time and place, while eDNA may have come from a different location, from predator feces, or from past presence, however this differentiation is often impossible. [25] [20] However, eDNA can be loosely classified as including many sectors of DNA biodiversity research, including fecal analysis and bulk samples when they are applicable to biodiversity research and ecosystem analysis. [6]

selfDNA

The concept of selfDNA stems from discoveries made by scientists from the University of Naples Federico II, which were reported during 2015 in the journal New Phytologist , [26] about the self-inhibitory effect of extracellular DNA in plants, [27] but also in bacteria, fungi, algae, plants, protozoa and insects. [28] The environmental source of such extracellular DNA is proposed to be plant litter but also other sources in different ecosystems and organisms, with the size of DNA fragments experimentally shown to have an inhibitory effect upon their conspecific organisms typically ranging between 200 and 500 base pairs. The selfDNA phenomenon has been postulated to drive ecological interactions and to be mechanistically mediated by damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) [29] [30] and to have potential for the development of biocidal applications. [31]

eDNA metabarcoding

By 2019 methods in eDNA research had been expanded to be able to assess whole communities from a single sample. This process involves metabarcoding, which can be precisely defined as the use of general or universal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers on mixed DNA samples from any origin followed by high-throughput next-generation sequencing (NGS) to determine the species composition of the sample. This method has been common in microbiology for years, but is only just finding its footing in assessment of macroorganisms. [32] [22] [25] [20] Ecosystem-wide applications of eDNA metabarcoding have the potential to not only describe communities and biodiversity, but also to detect interactions and functional ecology over large spatial scales, [33] though it may be limited by false readings due to contamination or other errors. [32] [7] [34] [25] [19] Altogether, eDNA metabarcoding increases speed, accuracy, and identification over traditional barcoding and decreases cost, but needs to be standardized and unified, integrating taxonomy and molecular methods for full ecological study. [22] [35] [36] [37] [19] [6] [38]

eDNA metabarcoding has applications to diversity monitoring across all habitats and taxonomic groups, ancient ecosystem reconstruction, plant-pollinator interactions, diet analysis, invasive species detection, pollution responses, and air quality monitoring. eDNA metabarcoding is a unique method still in development and will likely remain in flux for some time as technology advances and procedures become standardized. However, as metabarcoding is optimized and its use becomes more widespread, it is likely to become an essential tool for ecological monitoring and global conservation study. [6]

Extracellular and relic DNA

Extracellular DNA, sometimes called relic DNA, is DNA from dead microbes. Naked extracellular DNA (eDNA), most of it released by cell death, is nearly ubiquitous in the environment. Its concentration in soil may be as high as 2 μg/L, and its concentration in natural aquatic environments may be as high at 88 μg/L. [40] Various possible functions have been proposed for eDNA: it may be involved in horizontal gene transfer; [41] it may provide nutrients; [42] and it may act as a buffer to recruit or titrate ions or antibiotics. [43] Extracellular DNA acts as a functional extracellular matrix component in the biofilms of several bacterial species. It may act as a recognition factor to regulate the attachment and dispersal of specific cell types in the biofilm; [44] it may contribute to biofilm formation; [45] and it may contribute to the biofilm's physical strength and resistance to biological stress. [46]

Under the name of environmental DNA, eDNA has seen increased use in the natural sciences as a survey tool for ecology, monitoring the movements and presence of species in water, air, or on land, and assessing an area's biodiversity. [47] [48]

In the diagram on the right, the amount of relic DNA in a microbial environment is determined by inputs associated with the mortality of viable individuals with intact DNA and by losses associated with the degradation of relic DNA. If the diversity of sequences contained in the relic DNA pool is sufficiently different from that in the intact DNA pool, then relic DNA may bias estimates of microbial biodiversity (as indicated by different colored boxes) when sampling from the total (intact + relic) DNA pool. [39] Standardised Data on Initiatives (STARDIT) has been proposed as one way of standardising both data about sampling and analysis methods, and taxonomic and ontological relationships. [49]

Collection

Terrestrial sediments

The importance of eDNA analysis stemmed from the recognition of the limitations presented by culture-based studies. [7] Organisms have adapted to thrive in the specific conditions of their natural environments. Although scientists work to mimic these environments, many microbial organisms can not be removed and cultured in a laboratory setting. [9] The earliest version of this analysis began with ribosomal RNA (rRNA) in microbes to better understand microbes that live in hostile environments. [51] The genetic makeup of some microbes is then only accessible through eDNA analysis. Analytical techniques of eDNA were first applied to terrestrial sediments yielding DNA from both extinct and extant mammals, birds, insects and plants. [52] Samples extracted from these terrestrial sediments are commonly referenced as 'sedimentary ancient DNA' (sedaDNA or dirtDNA). [53] The eDNA analysis can also be used to study current forest communities including everything from birds and mammals to fungi and worms. [9] Samples can be obtained from soil, faeces, 'bite DNA' from where leaves have been bitten, plants and leaves where animals have been, and from the blood meals of captured mosquitos which may have eaten blood from any animals in the area. [54] Some methods can also attempt to capture cells with hair traps and sandpaper in areas commonly transversed by target species.

Aquatic sediments

The sedaDNA was subsequently used to study ancient animal diversity and verified using known fossil records in aquatic sediments. [9] The aquatic sediments are deprived of oxygen and are thus protect the DNA from degrading. [9] Other than ancient studies, this approach can be used to understand current animal diversity with relatively high sensitivity. While typical water samples can have the DNA degrade relatively quickly, the aquatic sediment samples can have useful DNA two months after the species was present. [55] One problem with aquatic sediments is that it is unknown where the organism deposited the eDNA as it could have moved in the water column.

Aquatic (water column)

Studying eDNA in the water column can indicate the community composition of a body of water. Before eDNA, the main ways to study open water diversity was to use fishing and trapping, which requires resources such as funding and skilled labour, whereas eDNA only needs samples of water. [10] This method is effective as pH of the water does not affect the DNA as much as previously thought, and sensitivity can be increased relatively easily. [10] [57] Sensitivity is how likely the DNA marker will be present in the sampled water, and can be increased simply by taking more samples, having bigger samples, and increasing PCR. [57] eDNA degrades relatively fast in the water column, which is very beneficial in short term conservation studies such as identifying what species are present. [9]

Researchers at the Experimental Lakes Area in Ontario, Canada and McGill University have found that eDNA distribution reflects lake stratification. [58] As seasons and water temperature change, water density also changes such that it forms distinct layers in small boreal lakes in the summer and winter. These layers mix during the spring and fall. [59] Fish habitat use correlates to stratification (e.g. a cold-water fish like lake trout will stay in cold water) and so does eDNA distribution, as these researchers found. [58]

Monitoring species

eDNA can be used to monitor species throughout the year and can be very useful in conservation monitoring. [17] [60] [61] eDNA analysis has been successful at identifying many different taxa from aquatic plants, [62] aquatic mammals, [21] [17] fishes, [32] [61] mussels, [60] fungi [63] [64] and even parasites. [65] [51] eDNA has been used to study species while minimizing any stress inducing human interaction, allowing researchers to monitor species presence at larger spatial scales more efficiently. [66] [67] The most prevalent use in current research is using eDNA to study the locations of species at risk, invasive species, and keystone species across all environments. [66] eDNA is especially useful for studying species with small populations because eDNA is sensitive enough to confirm the presence of a species with relatively little effort to collect data which can often be done with a soil sample or water sample. [7] [66] eDNA relies on the efficiency of genomic sequencing and analysis as well as the survey methods used which continue to become more efficient and cheaper. [68] Some studies have shown that eDNA sampled from stream and inshore environment decayed to undetectable level at within about 48 hours. [69] [70]

Environmental DNA can be applied as a tool to detect low abundance organisms in both active and passive forms. Active eDNA surveys target individual species or groups of taxa for detection by using highly sensitive species-specific quantitative real-time PCR [71] or digital droplet PCR markers. [72] CRISPR-Cas methodology has also been applied to the detection of single species from eDNA; [73] utilising the Cas12a enzyme and allowing greater specificity when detecting sympatric taxa. Passive eDNA surveys employ massively-parallel DNA sequencing to amplify all eDNA molecules in a sample with no a priori target in mind providing blanket DNA evidence of biotic community composition. [74]

Decline of terrestrial arthropods

Terrestrial arthropods are experiencing massive decline in Europe as well as globally, [75] [76] [77] [78] although only a fraction of the species have been assessed and the majority of insects are still undescribed to science. [79] As one example, grassland ecosystems are home to diverse taxonomic and functional groups of terrestrial arthropods, such as pollinators, phytophagous insects, and predators, that use nectar and pollen for food sources, and stem and leaf tissue for food and development. These communities harbor endangered species, since many habitats have disappeared or are under significant threat. [80] [81] Therefore, extensive efforts are being conducted in order to restore European grassland ecosystems and conserve biodiversity. [82] For instance, pollinators like bees and butterflies represent an important ecological group that has undergone severe decline in Europe, indicating a dramatic loss of grassland biodiversity. [83] [84] [85] [86] The vast majority of flowering plants are pollinated by insects and other animals both in temperate regions and the tropics. [87] The majority of insect species are herbivores feeding on different parts of plants, and most of these are specialists, relying on one or a few plant species as their main food resource. [88] However, given the gap in knowledge on existing insect species, and the fact that most species are still undescribed, it is clear that for the majority of plant species in the world, there is limited knowledge about the arthropod communities they harbor and interact with. [1]

Terrestrial arthropod communities have traditionally been collected and studied using methods, such as Malaise traps and pitfall traps, which are very effective but somewhat cumbersome and potentially invasive methods. In some instances, these techniques fall short of performing efficient and standardized surveys, due to, for example, phenotypic plasticity, closely related species, and difficulties in identifying juvenile stages. Furthermore, morphological identification depends directly on taxonomic expertise, which is in decline. [89] [90] [91] All such limitations of traditional biodiversity monitoring have created a demand for alternative approaches. Meanwhile, the advance in DNA sequencing technologies continuously provides new means of obtaining biological data. [7] [92] [25] [9] Hence, several new molecular approaches have recently been suggested for obtaining fast and efficient data on arthropod communities and their interactions through non‐invasive genetic techniques. This includes extracting DNA from sources such as bulk samples or insect soups, [93] [94] [95] [96] empty leaf mines, [97] spider webs, [98] pitcher plant fluid, [99] environmental samples like soil, water, air, and even whole flowers (environmental DNA [eDNA]), [100] [101] [102] [9] [103] host plant and predatory diet identification from insect DNA extracts, [104] [105] and predator scat from bats. [106] [107] Recently, also DNA from pollen attached to insects has been used for retrieving information on plant–pollinator interactions. [108] [109] Many of such recent studies rely on DNA metabarcoding—high‐throughput sequencing of PCR amplicons using generic primers. [110] [101] [1]

Mammals

Snow tracks

Wildlife researchers in snowy areas also use snow samples to gather and extract genetic information about species of interest. DNA from snow track samples has been used to confirm the presence of such elusive and rare species as polar bears, arctic fox, lynx, wolverines, and fishers. [111] [112] [113] [114]

DNA from the air

In 2021, researchers demonstrated that eDNA can be collected from air and used to identify mammals. [115] [116] [117] [118] In 2023, scientists developed a specialized sampling probe and aircraft surveys to assess biodiversity of multiple taxa, including mammals, using air eDNA. [119]

Managing fisheries

Overfishing the Canadian northern cod fishery resulted in catastrophic collapse Surexploitation morue surpecheEn.jpg
Overfishing the Canadian northern cod fishery resulted in catastrophic collapse 
In this example, a fish leaves eDNA behind in a trail as it moves through the water, but the trail dissipates slowly over time (click to enlarge) EDNA gif without time.gif
In this example, a fish leaves eDNA behind in a trail as it moves through the water, but the trail dissipates slowly over time (click to enlarge)

The successful management of commercial fisheries relies on standardised surveys to estimate the quantity and distribution of fish stocks. Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) is an iconic example that demonstrates how poorly constrained data and uninformed decision making can result in catastrophic stock decline and ensuing economic and social problems. [121] Traditional stock assessments of demersal fish species have relied primarily on trawl surveys, which have provided a valuable stream of information to decision makers. [122] However, there are some notable drawbacks of demersal trawl surveys including cost, [123] gear selectivity/catchability, [124] habitat destruction [125] and restricted coverage (e.g. hard-substrate bottom environments, marine protected areas). [126]

Environmental DNA (eDNA) has emerged as a potentially powerful alternative for studying ecosystem dynamics. The constant loss and shedding of genetic material from macroorganisms imparts a molecular footprint in environmental samples that can be analysed to determine either the presence of specific target species  [13] [127] or characterise biodiversity. [128] [129] The combination of next generation sequencing and eDNA sampling has been successfully applied in aquatic systems to document spatial and temporal patterns in the diversity of fish fauna. [130] [131] [132] [133] To further develop the utility of eDNA for fisheries management, understanding the ability of eDNA quantities to reflect fish biomass in the ocean is an important next step. [126]

Positive relationships between eDNA quantities and fish biomass and abundance have been demonstrated in experimental systems. [134] [135] [136] However, known variations between eDNA production  [137] [138] and degradation  [139] [140] [141] [142] rates is anticipated to complicate these relationships in natural systems. Furthermore, in oceanic systems, large habitat volumes and strong currents are likely to result in physical dispersal of DNA fragments away from target organisms. [143] These confounding factors have been previously considered to restrict the application of quantitative eDNA monitoring in oceanic settings. [143] [126]

Despite these potential constraints, numerous studies in marine environments have found positive relationships between eDNA quantities and complimentary survey efforts including radio-tagging, [144] visual surveys, [133] [145] echo-sounding  [146] and trawl surveys. [132] [147] However, studies that quantify target eDNA concentrations of commercial fish species with standardised trawl surveys in marine environments are much scarcer. [147] In this context, direct comparisons of eDNA concentrations with biomass and stock assessment metrics, such as catch per unit effort (CPUE), are necessary to understand the applicability of eDNA monitoring to contribute to fisheries management efforts. [126]

Deep sea sediments

Extracellular DNA in surface deep-sea sediments is by far the largest reservoir of DNA of the world oceans. [149] The main sources of extracellular DNA in such ecosystems are represented by in situ DNA release from dead benthic organisms, and/or other processes including cell lysis due to viral infection, cellular exudation and excretion from viable cells, virus decomposition, and allochthonous inputs from the water column. [149] [150] [151] [152] Previous studies provided evidence that an important fraction of extracellular DNA can escape degradation processes, remaining preserved in the sediments. [153] [154] This DNA represents, potentially, a genetic repository that records biological processes occurring over time. [155] [156] [148]

Recent investigations revealed that DNA preserved in marine sediments is characterized by a large number of highly diverse gene sequences. [155] [156] [157] In particular, extracellular DNA has been used to reconstruct past prokaryotic and eukaryotic diversity in benthic ecosystems characterized by low temperatures and/or permanently anoxic conditions. [157] [158] [159] [160] [161] [148]

The diagram on the right shows the OTU (operational taxonomic unit) network of the extracellular DNA pools from the sediments of the different continental margins. The dot size within the network is proportional to the abundance of sequences for each OTU. Dots circled in red represent extracellular core OTUs, dot circled in yellow are partially shared (among two or more pools) OTUs, dots circled in black are OTUs exclusive of each pool. The core OTUs contributing at least for 20 sequences are shown. The numbers in parentheses represent the number of connections among OTUs and samples: 1 for exclusive OTUs, 2–3 for partially shared OTUs and 4 for core OTUs. [148]

Previous studies suggested that the preservation of DNA might be also favoured in benthic systems characterised by high organic matter inputs and sedimentation rates, such as continental margins. [162] [163] These systems, which represent ca. 15% of the global seafloor, are also hotspots of benthic prokaryotic diversity, [164] [165] [166] and therefore they could represent optimal sites to investigate the prokaryotic diversity preserved within extracellular DNA. [148]

Spatial distribution of prokaryotic diversity has been intensively studied in benthic deep-sea ecosystems  [167] [168] [169] [170] through the analysis of "environmental DNA" (i.e., the genetic material obtained directly from environmental samples without any obvious signs of biological source material). [9] However, the extent to which gene sequences contained within extracellular DNA can alter the estimates of the diversity of the present-day prokaryotic assemblages is unknown. [171] [148]

Sedimentary ancient DNA

Analyses of ancient DNA preserved in various archives have transformed understanding of the evolution of species and ecosystems. Whilst earlier studies have concentrated on DNA extracted from taxonomically constrained samples (such as bones or frozen tissue), advances in high-throughput sequencing and bioinformatics now allow the analysis of ancient DNA extracted from sedimentary archives, [172] so called sedaDNA. The accumulation and preservation of sedaDNA buried in land and lake sediments have been subject to active research and interpretation. [173] However, studying the deposition of DNA on the ocean floor and its preservation in marine sediments is more complex because the DNA has to travel through a water column for several kilometers. [174] Unlike in the terrestrial environment, with pervasive transport of subfossil biomass from land, the largest portion of the marine sedaDNA is derived from planktonic community, which is dominated by marine microbes and marine protists. [175] After the death of the surface plankton, its DNA is subject to a transport through the water column, during which much of the associated organic matter is known to be consumed and respired. [176] This transport could take between 3 and 12 days depending on the size and morphology of test. [177] However, it remains unclear how exactly the planktonic eDNA, defined as the total DNA present in the environment after, [178] survives this transport, whether the degradation or transport are associated with sorting or lateral advection, and finally, whether the eDNA arriving at the seafloor is preserved in marine sediments without further distortion of its composition. [179]

Despite the long exposure to degradation under oxic conditions during transport in the water column, and substantially lower concentration of organic matter on the seafloor, there is evidence that planktonic eDNA is preserved in marine sediments and contains exploitable ecological signal. [180] Earlier studies have shown sedaDNA preservation in marine sediments deposited under anoxia with unusually high amounts of organic matter preserved, [181] but later investigations indicate that sedaDNA can also be extracted from normal marine sediments, dominated by clastic or biogenic mineral fractions. [182] [183] [184] In addition, the low temperature of deep-sea water (0–4 °C) ensures a good preservation of sedaDNA. [178] [180] Using planktonic foraminifera as a "Rosetta Stone", allowing benchmarking of sedaDNA signatures by co-occurring fossil tests of these organisms, Morard et al. showed in 2017 that the fingerprint of plankton eDNA arriving on the seafloor preserves the ecological signature of these organisms at a large geographic scale. [181] This indicates that planktonic community eDNA is deposited onto the seafloor below, together with aggregates, skeletons and other sinking planktonic material. If this is true, sedaDNA should be able to record signatures of surface ocean hydrography, affecting the composition of plankton communities, with the same spatial resolution as the skeletal remains of the plankton. In addition, if the plankton eDNA is arriving on the seafloor in association with aggregates or shells, it is possible that it withstands the transport through the water column by fixation onto mineral surfaces. The same mechanism has been proposed to explain the preservation of sedaDNA in sediments, [182] [183] [184] implying that the flux of planktonic eDNA encapsulated in calcite test arriving on the seafloor is conditioned for preservation upon burial. [179]

Planktonic foraminifera sedaDNA is an ideal proxy both “horizontally” to assess the spatial resolution of reconstructing past surface ocean hydrographic features and “vertically”, to unambiguously track the burial of its signal throughout the sediment column. Indeed, the flux of planktonic foraminifera eDNA should be proportionate to the flux of dead foraminiferal shells sinking to the seafloor, allowing independent benchmarking of the eDNA signal. eDNA is powerful tool to study ecosystem because it does not require direct taxonomic knowledge thus allowing information to be gathered on every organism present in a sample, even at the cryptic level. However, assignment of the eDNA sequences to known organisms is done via comparison with reference sequences (or barcodes) made available in public repositories or curated databases. [185] The taxonomy of planktonic foraminifera is well understood [186] and barcodes exist allowing almost complete mapping of eDNA amplicons on the taxonomy based on foraminiferal test morphology. [187] [188] Importantly, the composition of planktonic foraminifera communities is closely linked to surface hydrography and this signal is preserved by fossil tests deposited on the seafloor. [189] [190] Since foraminiferal eDNA accumulated in the ocean sediment can be recovered, it could be used to analyze changes in planktonic and benthic communities over time. [191] [192] [193] [194] [179]

On 7 December 2022, The New York Times reported that two-million year old eDNA genetic material was found in Greenland, and is currently considered the oldest DNA discovered so far. [11] [12]

Participatory research and citizen science

The relative simplicity of eDNA sampling lends itself to projects which seek to involve local communities in being part of research projects, including collecting and analysing DNA samples. This can empower local communities (including Indigenous peoples) to be actively involved in monitoring the species in an environment, and help make informed decisions as part of participatory action research model. An example of such a project has been demonstrated by the charity Science for All with the 'Wild DNA' project. [195]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zooplankton</span> Heterotrophic protistan or metazoan members of the plankton ecosystem

Zooplankton are the animal component of the planktonic community, having to consume other organisms to thrive. Plankton are aquatic organisms that are unable to swim effectively against currents. Consequently, they drift or are carried along by currents in the ocean, or by currents in seas, lakes or rivers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cold seep</span> Ocean floor area where hydrogen sulfide, methane and other hydrocarbon-rich fluid seepage occurs

A cold seep is an area of the ocean floor where hydrogen sulfide, methane and other hydrocarbon-rich fluid seepage occurs, often in the form of a brine pool. Cold does not mean that the temperature of the seepage is lower than that of the surrounding sea water. On the contrary, its temperature is often slightly higher. The "cold" is relative to the very warm conditions of a hydrothermal vent. Cold seeps constitute a biome supporting several endemic species.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Metagenomics</span> Study of genes found in the environment

Metagenomics is the study of genetic material recovered directly from environmental or clinical samples by a method called sequencing. The broad field may also be referred to as environmental genomics, ecogenomics, community genomics or microbiomics.

The Future of Marine Animal Populations (FMAP) project was one of the core projects of the international Census of Marine Life (2000–2010). FMAP's mission was to describe and synthesize globally changing patterns of species abundance, distribution, and diversity, and to model the effects of fishing, climate change and other key variables on those patterns. This work was done across ocean realms and with an emphasis on understanding past changes and predicting future scenarios.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">DNA barcoding</span> Method of species identification using a short section of DNA

DNA barcoding is a method of species identification using a short section of DNA from a specific gene or genes. The premise of DNA barcoding is that by comparison with a reference library of such DNA sections, an individual sequence can be used to uniquely identify an organism to species, just as a supermarket scanner uses the familiar black stripes of the UPC barcode to identify an item in its stock against its reference database. These "barcodes" are sometimes used in an effort to identify unknown species or parts of an organism, simply to catalog as many taxa as possible, or to compare with traditional taxonomy in an effort to determine species boundaries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zetaproteobacteria</span> Class of bacteria

The class Zetaproteobacteria is the sixth and most recently described class of the Pseudomonadota. Zetaproteobacteria can also refer to the group of organisms assigned to this class. The Zetaproteobacteria were originally represented by a single described species, Mariprofundus ferrooxydans, which is an iron-oxidizing neutrophilic chemolithoautotroph originally isolated from Kamaʻehuakanaloa Seamount in 1996 (post-eruption). Molecular cloning techniques focusing on the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene have also been used to identify a more diverse majority of the Zetaproteobacteria that have as yet been unculturable.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marine microorganisms</span> Any life form too small for the naked human eye to see that lives in a marine environment

Marine microorganisms are defined by their habitat as microorganisms living in a marine environment, that is, in the saltwater of a sea or ocean or the brackish water of a coastal estuary. A microorganism is any microscopic living organism or virus, that is too small to see with the unaided human eye without magnification. Microorganisms are very diverse. They can be single-celled or multicellular and include bacteria, archaea, viruses and most protozoa, as well as some fungi, algae, and animals, such as rotifers and copepods. Many macroscopic animals and plants have microscopic juvenile stages. Some microbiologists also classify viruses as microorganisms, but others consider these as non-living.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mycoplankton</span> Fungal members of the plankton communities of aquatic ecosystems

Mycoplankton are saprotrophic members of the plankton communities of marine and freshwater ecosystems. They are composed of filamentous free-living fungi and yeasts that are associated with planktonic particles or phytoplankton. Similar to bacterioplankton, these aquatic fungi play a significant role in heterotrophicmineralization and nutrient cycling. Mycoplankton can be up to 20 mm in diameter and over 50 mm in length.

<i>Diogenes heteropsammicola</i> Species of crustaceans

Diogenes heteropsammicola is a species of hermit crab discovered during samplings between 2012 and 2016 in the shallow waters of the Japanese Amami Islands. This D. heteropsammicola is strongly associated with the walking corals. This hermit crab species is unique due to the discovery that they use living, growing coral as a shell. The live in the inside of the coral and vary from other types of hermits. Crustaceans of this type commonly replace their shell as the organism grows in size, but D. heteropsammicola are the first of their kind to use solitary corals as a shell form. Heteropsammia and Heterocyathus are the two solitary corals that this hermit species has been observed as occupying. These two coral species are also used as a home by symbiotic Sipuncula of the genus Aspidosiphon, which normally occupy the corals that were previously occupied by crabs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pollen DNA barcoding</span> Process of identifying pollen donor plant species

Pollen DNA barcoding is the process of identifying pollen donor plant species through the amplification and sequencing of specific, conserved regions of plant DNA. Being able to accurately identify pollen has a wide range of applications though it has been difficult in the past due to the limitations of microscopic identification of pollen.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aquatic macroinvertebrate DNA barcoding</span>

DNA barcoding is an alternative method to the traditional morphological taxonomic classification, and has frequently been used to identify species of aquatic macroinvertebrates. Many are crucial indicator organisms in the bioassessment of freshwater and marine ecosystems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Algae DNA barcoding</span> Technique used for species identification and phylogenetic studies

DNA barcoding of algae is commonly used for species identification and phylogenetic studies. Algae form a phylogenetically heterogeneous group, meaning that the application of a single universal barcode/marker for species delimitation is unfeasible, thus different markers/barcodes are applied for this aim in different algal groups.

Microbial DNA barcoding is the use of DNA metabarcoding to characterize a mixture of microorganisms. DNA metabarcoding is a method of DNA barcoding that uses universal genetic markers to identify DNA of a mixture of organisms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fish DNA barcoding</span>

DNA barcoding methods for fish are used to identify groups of fish based on DNA sequences within selected regions of a genome. These methods can be used to study fish, as genetic material, in the form of environmental DNA (eDNA) or cells, is freely diffused in the water. This allows researchers to identify which species are present in a body of water by collecting a water sample, extracting DNA from the sample and isolating DNA sequences that are specific for the species of interest. Barcoding methods can also be used for biomonitoring and food safety validation, animal diet assessment, assessment of food webs and species distribution, and for detection of invasive species.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">DNA barcoding in diet assessment</span>

DNA barcoding in diet assessment is the use of DNA barcoding to analyse the diet of organisms. and further detect and describe their trophic interactions. This approach is based on the identification of consumed species by characterization of DNA present in dietary samples, e.g. individual food remains, regurgitates, gut and fecal samples, homogenized body of the host organism, target of the diet study.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marine food web</span> Marine consumer-resource system

Compared to terrestrial environments, marine environments have biomass pyramids which are inverted at the base. In particular, the biomass of consumers is larger than the biomass of primary producers. This happens because the ocean's primary producers are tiny phytoplankton which grow and reproduce rapidly, so a small mass can have a fast rate of primary production. In contrast, many significant terrestrial primary producers, such as mature forests, grow and reproduce slowly, so a much larger mass is needed to achieve the same rate of primary production.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marine microbiome</span>

All animals on Earth form associations with microorganisms, including protists, bacteria, archaea, fungi, and viruses. In the ocean, animal–microbial relationships were historically explored in single host–symbiont systems. However, new explorations into the diversity of marine microorganisms associating with diverse marine animal hosts is moving the field into studies that address interactions between the animal host and a more multi-member microbiome. The potential for microbiomes to influence the health, physiology, behavior, and ecology of marine animals could alter current understandings of how marine animals adapt to change, and especially the growing climate-related and anthropogenic-induced changes already impacting the ocean environment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marine viruses</span> Viruses found in marine environments

Marine viruses are defined by their habitat as viruses that are found in marine environments, that is, in the saltwater of seas or oceans or the brackish water of coastal estuaries. Viruses are small infectious agents that can only replicate inside the living cells of a host organism, because they need the replication machinery of the host to do so. They can infect all types of life forms, from animals and plants to microorganisms, including bacteria and archaea.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marine coastal ecosystem</span> Wildland-ocean interface

A marine coastal ecosystem is a marine ecosystem which occurs where the land meets the ocean. Marine coastal ecosystems include many very different types of marine habitats, each with their own characteristics and species composition. They are characterized by high levels of biodiversity and productivity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Metabarcoding</span> Genetic technique for identifying organisms in mixed samples

Metabarcoding is the barcoding of DNA/RNA in a manner that allows for the simultaneous identification of many taxa within the same sample. The main difference between barcoding and metabarcoding is that metabarcoding does not focus on one specific organism, but instead aims to determine species composition within a sample.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Thomsen, Philip Francis; Sigsgaard, Eva E. (2019). "Environmental DNA metabarcoding of wild flowers reveals diverse communities of terrestrial arthropods". Ecology and Evolution. 9 (4): 1665–1679. Bibcode:2019EcoEv...9.1665T. doi:10.1002/ece3.4809. PMC   6392377 . PMID   30847063. S2CID   71143282. CC-BY icon.svg Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  2. 1 2 3 Stewart, Kathryn A. (1 April 2019). "Understanding the effects of biotic and abiotic factors on sources of aquatic environmental DNA". Biodiversity and Conservation. 28 (5): 983–1001. Bibcode:2019BiCon..28..983S. doi: 10.1007/s10531-019-01709-8 . hdl: 11245.1/1caeb8dd-3d0b-493c-90dd-c180c9c8f21c . ISSN   1572-9710. S2CID   61811470.
  3. ↑ "Environmental DNA – how a tool used to detect endangered wildlife ended up helping fight the COVID-19 pandemic". 21 April 2021.
  4. ↑ "What is eDNA?". Freshwater Habitats Trust.
  5. ↑ Fahner, Nicole (2016). "Large-Scale Monitoring of Plants through Environmental DNA Metabarcoding of Soil: Recovery, Resolution, and Annotation of Four DNA Markers". PLOS ONE. 11 (6): 1–16. Bibcode:2016PLoSO..1157505F. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157505 . ISSN   1932-6203. PMC   4911152 . PMID   27310720 – via Directory of Open Access Journals.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Ruppert, Krista M.; Kline, Richard J.; Rahman, Md Saydur (2019). "Past, present, and future perspectives of environmental DNA (EDNA) metabarcoding: A systematic review in methods, monitoring, and applications of global eDNA". Global Ecology and Conservation. 17: e00547. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00547 . S2CID   133855497. CC-BY icon.svg Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Bohmann, Kristine; Evans, Alice; Gilbert, M. Thomas P.; Carvalho, Gary R.; Creer, Simon; Knapp, Michael; Yu, Douglas W.; de Bruyn, Mark (1 June 2014). "Environmental DNA for wildlife biology and biodiversity monitoring". Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 29 (6): 358–367. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2014.04.003. ISSN   1872-8383. PMID   24821515.
  8. ↑ Qu, Chanjuan; Stewart, Kathryn A. (18 February 2019). "Evaluating monitoring options for conservation: comparing traditional and environmental DNA tools for a critically endangered mammal". The Science of Nature. 106 (3): 9. Bibcode:2019SciNa.106....9Q. doi: 10.1007/s00114-019-1605-1 . hdl: 11245.1/d02ea724-b763-42b2-8f97-696ef88db996 . ISSN   1432-1904. PMID   30778682. S2CID   66881381.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Thomsen, Philip Francis; Willerslev, Eske (1 March 2015). "Environmental DNA – An emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity". Biological Conservation. Special Issue: Environmental DNA: A powerful new tool for biological conservation. 183: 4–18. Bibcode:2015BCons.183....4T. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.019 .
  10. 1 2 3 Tsuji, Satsuki (2016). "Effects of water pH and proteinase K treatment on the yield of environmental DNA from water samples". Limnology. 18: 1–7. doi:10.1007/s10201-016-0483-x. ISSN   1439-8621. S2CID   44793881.
  11. 1 2 Zimmer, Carl (7 December 2022). "Oldest Known DNA Offers Glimpse of a Once-Lush Arctic - In Greenland's permafrost, scientists discovered two-million-year-old genetic material from scores of plant and animal species, including mastodons, geese, lemmings and ants". The New York Times . Retrieved 7 December 2022.
  12. 1 2 Kjær, Kurt H.; et al. (7 December 2022). "A 2-million-year-old ecosystem in Greenland uncovered by environmental DNA". Nature . 612 (7939): 283–291. Bibcode:2022Natur.612..283K. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05453-y. PMC   9729109 . PMID   36477129. S2CID   254367944.
  13. 1 2 Ficetola, Gentile Francesco; Miaud, Claude; Pompanon, François; Taberlet, Pierre (2008). "Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples". Biology Letters. 4 (4): 423–425. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2008.0118. PMC   2610135 . PMID   18400683.
  14. 1 2 3 4 Barnes, Matthew A.; Turner, Cameron R. (2016). "The ecology of environmental DNA and implications for conservation genetics". Conservation Genetics. 17 (1): 1–17. Bibcode:2016ConG...17....1B. doi: 10.1007/s10592-015-0775-4 . hdl: 2346/87600 . S2CID   14914544.
  15. ↑ Deiner, Kristy; Walser, Jean-Claude; Mächler, Elvira; Altermatt, Florian (2015). "Choice of capture and extraction methods affect detection of freshwater biodiversity from environmental DNA". Biological Conservation. 183: 53–63. Bibcode:2015BCons.183...53D. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.018.
  16. 1 2 Taberlet, Pierre; Coissac, Eric; Pompanon, François; Brochmann, Christian; Willerslev, Eske (2012). "Towards next-generation biodiversity assessment using DNA metabarcoding". Molecular Ecology. 21 (8): 2045–2050. Bibcode:2012MolEc..21.2045T. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05470.x. PMID   22486824. S2CID   41437334.
  17. 1 2 3 4 5 Stewart, Kathryn; Ma, Hongjuan; Zheng, Jinsong; Zhao, Jianfu (2017). "Using environmental DNA to assess population-wide spatiotemporal reserve use". Conservation Biology (in Spanish). 31 (5): 1173–1182. Bibcode:2017ConBi..31.1173S. doi:10.1111/cobi.12910. ISSN   1523-1739. PMID   28221696. S2CID   3781648.
  18. 1 2 3 4 Goldberg, Caren S.; Turner, Cameron R.; Deiner, Kristy; Klymus, Katy E.; Thomsen, Philip Francis; Murphy, Melanie A.; Spear, Stephen F.; McKee, Anna; Oyler-Mccance, Sara J.; Cornman, Robert Scott; Laramie, Matthew B.; Mahon, Andrew R.; Lance, Richard F.; Pilliod, David S.; Strickler, Katherine M.; Waits, Lisette P.; Fremier, Alexander K.; Takahara, Teruhiko; Herder, Jelger E.; Taberlet, Pierre (2016). "Critical considerations for the application of environmental DNA methods to detect aquatic species". Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 7 (11): 1299–1307. Bibcode:2016MEcEv...7.1299G. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12595 . hdl: 20.500.11850/502281 . S2CID   89432389.
  19. 1 2 3 4 Hering, Daniel; Borja, Angel; Jones, J.Iwan; Pont, Didier; Boets, Pieter; Bouchez, Agnes; Bruce, Kat; Drakare, Stina; Hänfling, Bernd; Kahlert, Maria; Leese, Florian; Meissner, Kristian; Mergen, Patricia; Reyjol, Yorick; Segurado, Pedro; Vogler, Alfried; Kelly, Martyn (2018). "Implementation options for DNA-based identification into ecological status assessment under the European Water Framework Directive". Water Research. 138: 192–205. Bibcode:2018WatRe.138..192H. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2018.03.003. PMID   29602086. S2CID   5008250.
  20. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Deiner, Kristy; Bik, Holly M.; Mächler, Elvira; Seymour, Mathew; Lacoursière-Roussel, Anaïs; Altermatt, Florian; Creer, Simon; Bista, Iliana; Lodge, David M.; Vere, Natasha; Pfrender, Michael E.; Bernatchez, Louis (2017). "Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities". Molecular Ecology. 26 (21): 5872–5895. Bibcode:2017MolEc..26.5872D. doi: 10.1111/mec.14350 . hdl: 20.500.11850/455284 . PMID   28921802. S2CID   8001074.
  21. 1 2 Ma, Hongjuan; Stewart, Kathryn; Lougheed, Stephen; Zheng, Jinsong; Wang, Yuxiang; Zhao, Jianfu (1 December 2016). "Characterization, optimization, and validation of environmental DNA (eDNA) markers to detect an endangered aquatic mammal". Conservation Genetics Resources. 8 (4): 561–568. Bibcode:2016ConGR...8..561M. doi:10.1007/s12686-016-0597-9. ISSN   1877-7260. S2CID   1613649.
  22. 1 2 3 Coissac, Eric; Riaz, Tiayyba; Puillandre, Nicolas (2012). "Bioinformatic challenges for DNA metabarcoding of plants and animals". Molecular Ecology. 21 (8): 1834–1847. Bibcode:2012MolEc..21.1834C. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05550.x . PMID   22486822. S2CID   24398174.
  23. ↑ Eichmiller, Jessica J.; Best, Sendréa E.; Sorensen, Peter W. (2016). "Effects of Temperature and Trophic State on Degradation of Environmental DNA in Lake Water". Environmental Science & Technology. 50 (4): 1859–1867. Bibcode:2016EnST...50.1859E. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b05672. PMID   26771292.
  24. ↑ Carew, Melissa E.; Pettigrove, Vincent J.; Metzeling, Leon; Hoffmann, Ary A. (2013). "Environmental monitoring using next generation sequencing: Rapid identification of macroinvertebrate bioindicator species". Frontiers in Zoology. 10 (1): 45. doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-10-45 . PMC   3750358 . PMID   23919569.
  25. 1 2 3 4 Creer, Simon; Deiner, Kristy; Frey, Serita; Porazinska, Dorota; Taberlet, Pierre; Thomas, W. Kelley; Potter, Caitlin; Bik, Holly M. (2016). "The ecologist's field guide to sequence-based identification of biodiversity". Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 7 (9): 1008–1018. Bibcode:2016MEcEv...7.1008C. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12574 . hdl: 20.500.11850/125378 . S2CID   87512991.
  26. ↑ "Extracellular self-DNA warns plants of danger". www.newphytologist.org. Retrieved 10 January 2022.
  27. ↑ Mazzoleni S, Bonanomi G, Incerti G, Chiusano ML, Termolino P, Mingo A, Senatore M, Giannino F, Cartenì F, Rietkerk M, Lanzotti V. 2015a. Inhibitory and toxic effects of extracellular self-DNA in litter: a mechanism for negative plant–soil feedbacks? New Phytologist 205: 1195–1210
  28. ↑ Mazzoleni S, Cartenì F, Bonanomi G, Senatore M, Termolino P, Giannino F, Incerti G, Rietkerk M, Lanzotti V, Chiusano ML. 2015b. Inhibitory effects of extracellular self-DNA: a general biological process? New Phytologist 206: 127–132.
  29. ↑ Veresoglou, SD, Aguilar-Trigueros, CA, Mansour, I, Rillig, MC 2015. Self-DNA: a blessing in disguise? New Phytologist 207: 488–490.
  30. ↑ Duran-Flores, D, Heil, M. 2015. Growth inhibition by self-DNA: a phenomenon and its multiple explanations. New Phytologist 207: 482–485.
  31. ↑ Patent WO 2014/020624 A9
  32. 1 2 3 Qu, Chanjuan; Stewart, Kathryn A.; Clemente-Carvalho, Rute; Zheng, Jinsong; Wang, Yuxiang; Gong, Cheng; Ma, Limin; Zhao, Jianfu; Lougheed, Stephen C. (7 October 2020). "Comparing fish prey diversity for a critically endangered aquatic mammal in a reserve and the wild using eDNA metabarcoding". Scientific Reports. 10 (1): 16715. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-73648-2. ISSN   2045-2322. PMC   7542144 . PMID   33028872.
  33. ↑ Banerjee, Pritam; Stewart, Kathryn A.; Antognazza, Caterina M.; Bunholi, Ingrid V.; Deiner, Kristy; Barnes, Matthew A.; Saha, Santanu; Verdier, Héloïse; Doi, Hideyuki; Maity, Jyoti Prakash; Chan, Michael W.Y.; Chen, Chien Yen (2022). "Plant–animal interactions in the era of environmental DNA (eDNA)—A review". Environmental DNA. 4 (5): 987–999. doi: 10.1002/edn3.308 . hdl: 11383/2137932 . S2CID   248977497.
  34. ↑ Ficetola, Gentile Francesco; Taberlet, Pierre; Coissac, Eric (2016). "How to limit false positives in environmental DNA and metabarcoding?". Molecular Ecology Resources. 16 (3): 604–607. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12508 . PMID   27062589. S2CID   785279.
  35. ↑ Yu, Douglas W.; Ji, Yinqiu; Emerson, Brent C.; Wang, Xiaoyang; Ye, Chengxi; Yang, Chunyan; Ding, Zhaoli (2012). "Biodiversity soup: Metabarcoding of arthropods for rapid biodiversity assessment and biomonitoring". Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 3 (4): 613–623. Bibcode:2012MEcEv...3..613Y. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00198.x . hdl: 10261/193380 . S2CID   83095866.
  36. ↑ Cristescu, Melania E. (2014). "From barcoding single individuals to metabarcoding biological communities: Towards an integrative approach to the study of global biodiversity". Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 29 (10): 566–571. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2014.08.001. PMID   25175416. S2CID   18352572.
  37. ↑ Gibson, Joel F.; Shokralla, Shadi; Curry, Colin; Baird, Donald J.; Monk, Wendy A.; King, Ian; Hajibabaei, Mehrdad (2015). "Large-Scale Biomonitoring of Remote and Threatened Ecosystems via High-Throughput Sequencing". PLOS ONE. 10 (10): e0138432. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1038432G. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138432 . PMC   4619546 . PMID   26488407.
  38. ↑ Chua, Physilia Y. S.; Bourlat, Sarah J.; Ferguson, Cameron; Korlevic, Petra; Zhao, Leia; Ekrem, Torbjørn; Meier, Rudolf; Lawniczak, Mara K. N. (10 March 2023). "Future of DNA-based insect monitoring". Trends in Genetics. 39 (7): 531–544. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2023.02.012. PMID   36907721. S2CID   257470926.
  39. 1 2 Lennon, J. T.; Muscarella, M. E.; Placella, S. A.; Lehmkuhl, B. K. (2018). "How, when, and Where Relic DNA Affects Microbial Diversity". mBio. 9 (3). doi:10.1128/mBio.00637-18. PMC   6016248 . PMID   29921664. CC-BY icon.svg Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  40. ↑ Tani K, Nasu M (2010). "Roles of Extracellular DNA in Bacterial Ecosystems". In Kikuchi Y, Rykova EY (eds.). Extracellular Nucleic Acids . Springer. pp.  25–38. ISBN   978-3-642-12616-1.
  41. ↑ Vlassov VV, Laktionov PP, Rykova EY (July 2007). "Extracellular nucleic acids". BioEssays. 29 (7): 654–67. doi:10.1002/bies.20604. PMID   17563084. S2CID   32463239.
  42. ↑ Finkel SE, Kolter R (November 2001). "DNA as a nutrient: novel role for bacterial competence gene homologs". Journal of Bacteriology. 183 (21): 6288–93. doi:10.1128/JB.183.21.6288-6293.2001. PMC   100116 . PMID   11591672.
  43. ↑ Mulcahy H, Charron-Mazenod L, Lewenza S (November 2008). "Extracellular DNA chelates cations and induces antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms". PLOS Pathogens. 4 (11): e1000213. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000213 . PMC   2581603 . PMID   19023416.
  44. ↑ Berne C, Kysela DT, Brun YV (August 2010). "A bacterial extracellular DNA inhibits settling of motile progeny cells within a biofilm". Molecular Microbiology. 77 (4): 815–29. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07267.x. PMC   2962764 . PMID   20598083.
  45. ↑ Whitchurch CB, Tolker-Nielsen T, Ragas PC, Mattick JS (February 2002). "Extracellular DNA required for bacterial biofilm formation". Science. 295 (5559): 1487. doi:10.1126/science.295.5559.1487. PMID   11859186.
  46. ↑ Hu W, Li L, Sharma S, Wang J, McHardy I, Lux R, Yang Z, He X, Gimzewski JK, Li Y, Shi W (2012). "DNA builds and strengthens the extracellular matrix in Myxococcus xanthus biofilms by interacting with exopolysaccharides". PLOS ONE. 7 (12): e51905. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...751905H. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051905 . PMC   3530553 . PMID   23300576.
  47. ↑ Foote AD, Thomsen PF, Sveegaard S, Wahlberg M, Kielgast J, Kyhn LA, et al. (2012). "Investigating the potential use of environmental DNA (eDNA) for genetic monitoring of marine mammals". PLOS ONE. 7 (8): e41781. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...741781F. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041781 . PMC   3430683 . PMID   22952587.
  48. ↑ "Researchers Detect Land Animals Using DNA in Nearby Water Bodies".
  49. ↑ Nunn, Jack S.; Shafee, Thomas (2022). "Standardised Data on Initiatives – STARDIT: Beta Version". OSF Preprints. 8 (1): 31. doi:10.31219/osf.io/w5xj6. PMC   9294764 . PMID   35854364. S2CID   242248848.
  50. 1 2 Armbrecht, Linda (2020). "The Potential of Sedimentary Ancient DNA to Reconstruct Past Ocean Ecosystems". Oceanography. 33 (2). doi:10.5670/oceanog.2020.211. S2CID   221020884. CC-BY icon.svg Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  51. 1 2 Bass, David (2015). "Diverse Applications of Environmental DNA Methods in Parasitology". Trends in Parasitology. 31 (10): 499–513. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2015.06.013 . hdl: 20.500.11850/105112 . PMID   26433253.
  52. ↑ Willerslev, Eske; Hansen, Anders J.; Binladen, Jonas; Brand, Tina B.; Gilbert, M. Thomas fP.; Shapiro, Beth; Bunce, Michael; Wiuf, Carsten; Gilichinsky, David A. (2 May 2003). "Diverse Plant and Animal Genetic Records from Holocene and Pleistocene Sediments". Science. 300 (5620): 791–795. Bibcode:2003Sci...300..791W. doi: 10.1126/science.1084114 . ISSN   0036-8075. PMID   12702808. S2CID   1222227.
  53. ↑ Andersen, Kenneth; Bird, Karen Lise; Rasmussen, Morten; Haile, James; Breuning-Madsen, Henrik; Kjaer, Kurt H.; Orlando, Ludovic; Gilbert, M. Thomas P.; Willerslev, Eske (1 April 2012). "Meta-barcoding of 'dirt' DNA from soil reflects vertebrate biodiversity". Molecular Ecology. 21 (8): 1966–1979. Bibcode:2012MolEc..21.1966A. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05261.x. ISSN   1365-294X. PMID   21917035. S2CID   43351435.
  54. ↑ Nunn, Jack (2020). "Science for All - Publicly funded research report (June 2018-December 2019)". Figshare. doi:10.26181/5eba630a64e08.
  55. ↑ Turner, Cameron R. (2014). "Fish environmental DNA is more concentrated in aquatic sediments than surface water". Biological Conservation. 183: 93–102. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.017 . ISSN   0006-3207.
  56. ↑ Gong; Fan; Li; Li; Zhang; Gromig; Smith; Dummann; Berger; Eisen; Tell; Biskaborn; Koglin; Wilhelms; Broy; Liu; Yang; Li; Liu; Talalay (2019). "Coring of Antarctic Subglacial Sediments". Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 7 (6): 194. doi: 10.3390/jmse7060194 . CC-BY icon.svg Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  57. 1 2 Schultz, Martin (2015). "Modeling the Sensitivity of Field Surveys for Detection of Environmental DNA (eDNA)". PLOS ONE. 10 (10): 1–16. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1041503S. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141503 . ISSN   1932-6203. PMC   4624909 . PMID   26509674.
  58. 1 2 Littlefair, Joanne E.; Hrenchuk, Lee E.; Blanchfield, Paul J.; Rennie, Michael D.; Cristescu, Melania E. (26 April 2020). "Thermal stratification and fish thermal preference explain vertical eDNA distributions in lakes". bioRxiv. 30 (13): 3083–3096. doi:10.1101/2020.04.21.042820. PMID   32888228. S2CID   218466213.
  59. ↑ "How and Why Lakes Stratify and Turn Over: We explain the science". IISD Experimental Lakes Area. 16 May 2018. Retrieved 14 July 2020.
  60. 1 2 Stoeckle, Bernhard (2016). "Environmental DNA as a monitoring tool for the endangered freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera L.): a substitute for classical monitoring approaches?". Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. 26 (6): 1120–1129. Bibcode:2016ACMFE..26.1120S. doi:10.1002/aqc.2611.
  61. 1 2 Souza, Lesley (2016). "Environmental DNA (eDNA) Detection Probability Is Influenced by Seasonal Activity of Organisms". PLOS ONE. 11 (10): 1–15. Bibcode:2016PLoSO..1165273D. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165273 . ISSN   1932-6203. PMC   5077074 . PMID   27776150.
  62. ↑ Saeko, Matsuhashi (2016). "Evaluation of the Environmental DNA Method for Estimating Distribution and Biomass of Submerged Aquatic Plants". PLOS ONE. 11 (6): 1–14. Bibcode:2016PLoSO..1156217M. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156217 . ISSN   1932-6203. PMC   4909283 . PMID   27304876.
  63. ↑ Tedersoo, Leho; Bahram, Mohammad; Põlme, Sergei; Kõljalg, Urmas; Yorou, Nourou S.; Wijesundera, Ravi; Ruiz, Luis Villarreal; Vasco-Palacios, Aída M.; Thu, Pham Quang (28 November 2014). "Global diversity and geography of soil fungi" (PDF). Science. 346 (6213): 1256688. doi:10.1126/science.1256688. hdl:10447/102930. ISSN   0036-8075. PMID   25430773. S2CID   206559506.
  64. ↑ Detheridge, Andrew Paul; Comont, David; Callaghan, Tony Martin; Bussell, Jennifer; Brand, Graham; Gwynn-Jones, Dylan; Scullion, John; Griffith, Gareth Wyn (June 2018). "Vegetation and edaphic factors influence rapid establishment of distinct fungal communities on former coal-spoil sites". Fungal Ecology. 33: 92–103. doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2018.02.002 . ISSN   1754-5048.
  65. ↑ Jones, Rhys Aled; Brophy, Peter M.; Davis, Chelsea N.; Davies, Teri E.; Emberson, Holly; Rees Stevens, Pauline; Williams, Hefin Wyn (8 June 2018). "Detection of Galba truncatula, Fasciola hepatica and Calicophoron daubneyi environmental DNA within water sources on pasture land, a future tool for fluke control?". Parasites & Vectors. 11 (1): 342. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2928-z . ISSN   1756-3305. PMC   5994096 . PMID   29884202.
  66. 1 2 3 Bergman, Paul S.; Schumer, Gregg; Blankenship, Scott; Campbell, Elizabeth (2016). "Detection of Adult Green Sturgeon Using Environmental DNA Analysis". PLOS ONE. 11 (4): 1–8. Bibcode:2016PLoSO..1153500B. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153500 . ISSN   1932-6203. PMC   4838217 . PMID   27096433.
  67. ↑ "A Guide to Environmental DNA (eDNA) by Biomeme". Biomeme.
  68. ↑ Wang, Xinkun (2016). Next-generation Sequencing Data Analysis. Boca Raton: CRC Press. ISBN   9781482217889. OCLC   940961529.
  69. ↑ Seymour, Mathew; Durance, Isabelle; Cosby, Bernard J.; Ransom-Jones, Emma; Deiner, Kristy; Ormerod, Steve J.; Colbourne, John K.; Wilgar, Gregory; Carvalho, Gary R. (22 January 2018). "Acidity promotes degradation of multi-species environmental DNA in lotic mesocosms". Communications Biology. 1 (1): 4. doi:10.1038/s42003-017-0005-3. ISSN   2399-3642. PMC   6123786 . PMID   30271891.
  70. ↑ Collins, Rupert A.; Wangensteen, Owen S.; O’Gorman, Eoin J.; Mariani, Stefano; Sims, David W.; Genner, Martin J. (5 November 2018). "Persistence of environmental DNA in marine systems". Communications Biology. 1 (1): 185. doi:10.1038/s42003-018-0192-6. ISSN   2399-3642. PMC   6218555 . PMID   30417122.
  71. ↑ "The TripleLock™ Platform - Precision Biomonitoriong". Environmental DNA Services. Retrieved 12 February 2019.
  72. ↑ Hunter, Margaret E.; Dorazio, Robert M.; Butterfield, John S. S.; Meigs-Friend, Gaia; Nico, Leo G.; Ferrante, Jason A. (20 November 2016). "Detection limits of quantitative and digital PCR assays and their influence in presence-absence surveys of environmental DNA". Molecular Ecology Resources. 17 (2): 221–229. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12619 . ISSN   1755-098X. PMID   27768244.
  73. ↑ Williams, Molly-Ann; O'Grady, Joyce; Ball, Bernard; Carlsson, Jens; Eyto, Elvira de; McGinnity, Philip; Jennings, Eleanor; Regan, Fiona; Parle-McDermott, Anne (2019). "The application of CRISPR-Cas for single species identification from environmental DNA". Molecular Ecology Resources. 19 (5): 1106–1114. doi:10.1111/1755-0998.13045. hdl: 10468/8053 . ISSN   1755-0998. PMID   31177615. S2CID   182949780.
  74. ↑ Opportunities in Ocean Sciences. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. 1 January 1998. doi:10.17226/9500. ISBN   9780309582926.
  75. ↑ Collen, Ben; (Zoologist), Monika Böhm; Kemp, Rachael; Baillie, Jonathan (2012). Spineless: Status and Trends of the World's Invertebrates. ISBN   9780900881701.
  76. ↑ Dirzo, R.; Young, H. S.; Galetti, M.; Ceballos, G.; Isaac, N. J. B.; Collen, B. (2014). "Defaunation in the Anthropocene" (PDF). Science. 345 (6195): 401–406. Bibcode:2014Sci...345..401D. doi:10.1126/science.1251817. PMID   25061202. S2CID   206555761.
  77. ↑ European Red List of Bees. Publications Office. 2014. ISBN   9789279445125.
  78. ↑ Swaay, Chris van (2010). European Red List of Butterflies. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature). ISBN   9789279141515.
  79. ↑ Stork, Nigel E. (2018). "How Many Species of Insects and Other Terrestrial Arthropods Are There on Earth?". Annual Review of Entomology. 63: 31–45. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-020117-043348 . PMID   28938083. S2CID   23755007.
  80. ↑ Habel, Jan Christian; Dengler, Jürgen; Janišová, Monika; Török, Péter; Wellstein, Camilla; Wiezik, Michal (2013). "European grassland ecosystems: Threatened hotspots of biodiversity". Biodiversity and Conservation. 22 (10): 2131–2138. Bibcode:2013BiCon..22.2131H. doi: 10.1007/s10531-013-0537-x . S2CID   15901140.
  81. ↑ Joern, Anthony; Laws, Angela N. (2013). "Ecological Mechanisms Underlying Arthropod Species Diversity in Grasslands". Annual Review of Entomology. 58: 19–36. doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153540. PMID   22830354.
  82. ↑ Silva, João Pedro (2008). LIFE and Europe's Grasslands: Restoring a Forgotten Habitat. Office for Official Publications of the Europ. Communities. ISBN   9789279101595.
  83. ↑ Biesmeijer, J. C.; Roberts, S. P.; Reemer, M.; Ohlemüller, R.; Edwards, M.; Peeters, T.; Schaffers, A. P.; Potts, S. G.; Kleukers, R.; Thomas, C. D.; Settele, J.; Kunin, W. E. (2006). "Parallel Declines in Pollinators and Insect-Pollinated Plants in Britain and the Netherlands". Science. 313 (5785): 351–354. Bibcode:2006Sci...313..351B. doi:10.1126/science.1127863. PMID   16857940. S2CID   16273738.
  84. ↑ Goulson, D.; Nicholls, E.; Botias, C.; Rotheray, E. L. (2015). "Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers". Science. 347 (6229). doi: 10.1126/science.1255957 . PMID   25721506. S2CID   206558985.
  85. ↑ Potts, Simon G.; Biesmeijer, Jacobus C.; Kremen, Claire; Neumann, Peter; Schweiger, Oliver; Kunin, William E. (2010). "Global pollinator declines: Trends, impacts and drivers". Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 25 (6): 345–353. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007. PMID   20188434.
  86. ↑ European Environment Agency (2013). The European grassland butterfly indicator: 1990–2011. Publications Office. doi:10.2800/89760. ISBN   9789292134020.
  87. ↑ Ollerton, Jeff; Winfree, Rachael; Tarrant, Sam (2011). "How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals?". Oikos. 120 (3): 321–326. Bibcode:2011Oikos.120..321O. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18644.x.
  88. ↑ Price, Peter W.; Denno, Robert F.; Eubanks, Micky D.; Finke, Deborah L.; Kaplan, Ian (2011). Insect Ecology. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511975387. ISBN   9780511975387.
  89. ↑ Hopkins, G. W.; Freckleton, R. P. (2002). "Declines in the numbers of amateur and professional taxonomists: Implications for conservation". Animal Conservation. 5 (3): 245–249. Bibcode:2002AnCon...5..245H. doi:10.1017/S1367943002002299. S2CID   86182871.
  90. ↑ Sangster, George; Luksenburg, Jolanda A. (2015). "Declining Rates of Species Described per Taxonomist: Slowdown of Progress or a Side-effect of Improved Quality in Taxonomy?". Systematic Biology. 64 (1): 144–151. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syu069 . PMID   25190593.
  91. ↑ Wheeler, Q. D.; Raven, P. H.; Wilson, E. O. (2004). "Taxonomy: Impediment or Expedient?". Science. 303 (5656): 285. doi: 10.1126/science.303.5656.285 . hdl: 1808/295 . PMID   14726557. S2CID   27481787.
  92. ↑ Bush, Alex; Sollmann, Rahel; Wilting, Andreas; Bohmann, Kristine; Cole, Beth; Balzter, Heiko; Martius, Christopher; Zlinszky, András; Calvignac-Spencer, Sébastien; Cobbold, Christina A.; Dawson, Terence P.; Emerson, Brent C.; Ferrier, Simon; Gilbert, M. Thomas P.; Herold, Martin; Jones, Laurence; Leendertz, Fabian H.; Matthews, Louise; Millington, James D. A.; Olson, John R.; Ovaskainen, Otso; Raffaelli, Dave; Reeve, Richard; Rödel, Mark-Oliver; Rodgers, Torrey W.; Snape, Stewart; Visseren-Hamakers, Ingrid; Vogler, Alfried P.; White, Piran C. L.; et al. (2017). "Connecting Earth observation to high-throughput biodiversity data" (PDF). Nature Ecology & Evolution. 1 (7): 176. Bibcode:2017NatEE...1..176B. doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0176. PMID   28812589. S2CID   205564094.
  93. ↑ Arribas, Paula; Andújar, Carmelo; Hopkins, Kevin; Shepherd, Matthew; Vogler, Alfried P. (2016). "Metabarcoding and mitochondrial metagenomics of endogean arthropods to unveil the mesofauna of the soil". Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 7 (9): 1071–1081. Bibcode:2016MEcEv...7.1071A. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12557 . hdl: 10044/1/49935 . S2CID   51899316.
  94. ↑ Elbrecht, Vasco; Taberlet, Pierre; Dejean, Tony; Valentini, Alice; Usseglio-Polatera, Philippe; Beisel, Jean-Nicolas; Coissac, Eric; Boyer, Frederic; Leese, Florian (2016). "Testing the potential of a ribosomal 16S marker for DNA metabarcoding of insects". PeerJ. 4: e1966. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1966 . PMC   4841222 . PMID   27114891.
  95. ↑ Hajibabaei, Mehrdad; Shokralla, Shadi; Zhou, Xin; Singer, Gregory A. C.; Baird, Donald J. (2011). "Environmental Barcoding: A Next-Generation Sequencing Approach for Biomonitoring Applications Using River Benthos". PLOS ONE. 6 (4): e17497. Bibcode:2011PLoSO...617497H. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017497 . PMC   3076369 . PMID   21533287.
  96. ↑ Xu, Charles C. Y.; Yen, Ivy J.; Bowman, Dean; Turner, Cameron R. (2015). "Spider Web DNA: A New Spin on Noninvasive Genetics of Predator and Prey". PLOS ONE. 10 (11): e0142503. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1042503X. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142503 . PMC   4659541 . PMID   26606730. S2CID   5331545.
  97. ↑ Derocles, Stéphane A. P.; Evans, Darren M.; Nichols, Paul C.; Evans, S. Aifionn; Lunt, David H. (2015). "Determining Plant – Leaf Miner – Parasitoid Interactions: A DNA Barcoding Approach". PLOS ONE. 10 (2): e0117872. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1017872D. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117872 . PMC   4339730 . PMID   25710377.
  98. ↑ Blake, Max; McKeown, Niall J.; Bushell, Mark L. T.; Shaw, Paul W. (2016). "DNA extraction from spider webs". Conservation Genetics Resources. 8 (3): 219–221. Bibcode:2016ConGR...8..219B. doi: 10.1007/s12686-016-0537-8 . hdl: 2160/43510 . S2CID   15122457.
  99. ↑ Bittleston, Leonora S.; Baker, Christopher C. M.; Strominger, Lila B.; Pringle, Anne; Pierce, Naomi E. (2016). "Metabarcoding as a tool for investigating arthropod diversity in Nepenthespitcher plants". Austral Ecology. 41 (2): 120–132. Bibcode:2016AusEc..41..120B. doi:10.1111/aec.12271.
  100. ↑ Gamonal Gomez, Nerea; Sørensen, Didde Hedegaard; Chua, Physilia Ying Shi; Sigsgaard, Lene (6 December 2022). "Assessing flower-visiting arthropod diversity in apple orchards through metabarcoding of environmental <scp>DNA</scp> from flowers and visual census". Environmental DNA. doi: 10.1002/edn3.362 . ISSN   2637-4943. S2CID   254391183.
  101. 1 2 Taberlet, Pierre; Coissac, Eric; Hajibabaei, Mehrdad; Rieseberg, Loren H. (2012). "Environmental DNA". Molecular Ecology. 21 (8): 1789–1793. Bibcode:2012MolEc..21.1789T. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05542.x. PMID   22486819. S2CID   3961830.
  102. ↑ Thomsen, Philip Francis; Kielgast, JOS; Iversen, Lars L.; Wiuf, Carsten; Rasmussen, Morten; Gilbert, M. Thomas P.; Orlando, Ludovic; Willerslev, Eske (2012). "Monitoring endangered freshwater biodiversity using environmental DNA". Molecular Ecology. 21 (11): 2565–2573. Bibcode:2012MolEc..21.2565T. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05418.x. PMID   22151771.
  103. ↑ Zinger, Lucie; Taberlet, Pierre; Schimann, Heidy; Bonin, Aurélie; Boyer, Frédéric; De Barba, Marta; Gaucher, Philippe; Gielly, Ludovic; Giguet-Covex, Charline; Iribar, Amaia; Réjou-Méchain, Maxime; Rayé, Gilles; Rioux, Delphine; Schilling, Vincent; Tymen, Blaise; Viers, Jérôme; Zouiten, Cyril; Thuiller, Wilfried; Coissac, Eric; Chave, Jérôme (2019). "Body size determines soil community assembly in a tropical forest". Molecular Ecology. 28 (3): 528–543. Bibcode:2019MolEc..28..528Z. doi:10.1111/mec.14919. PMID   30375061. S2CID   53114166.
  104. ↑ Jurado-Rivera, José A.; Vogler, Alfried P.; Reid, Chris A.M; Petitpierre, Eduard; Gómez-Zurita, Jesús (2009). "DNA barcoding insect–host plant associations". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 276 (1657): 639–648. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.1264. PMC   2660938 . PMID   19004756.
  105. ↑ Paula, Débora P.; Linard, Benjamin; Crampton-Platt, Alex; Srivathsan, Amrita; Timmermans, Martijn J. T. N.; Sujii, Edison R.; Pires, Carmen S. S.; Souza, Lucas M.; Andow, David A.; Vogler, Alfried P. (2016). "Uncovering Trophic Interactions in Arthropod Predators through DNA Shotgun-Sequencing of Gut Contents". PLOS ONE. 11 (9): e0161841. Bibcode:2016PLoSO..1161841P. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161841 . PMC   5021305 . PMID   27622637.
  106. ↑ Bohmann, Kristine; Monadjem, Ara; Lehmkuhl Noer, Christina; Rasmussen, Morten; Zeale, Matt R. K.; Clare, Elizabeth; Jones, Gareth; Willerslev, Eske; Gilbert, M. Thomas P. (2011). "Molecular Diet Analysis of Two African Free-Tailed Bats (Molossidae) Using High Throughput Sequencing". PLOS ONE. 6 (6): e21441. Bibcode:2011PLoSO...621441B. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021441 . PMC   3120876 . PMID   21731749.
  107. ↑ Vesterinen, Eero J.; Lilley, Thomas; Laine, Veronika N.; Wahlberg, Niklas (2013). "Next Generation Sequencing of Fecal DNA Reveals the Dietary Diversity of the Widespread Insectivorous Predator Daubenton's Bat (Myotis daubentonii) in Southwestern Finland". PLOS ONE. 8 (11): e82168. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...882168V. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082168 . PMC   3842304 . PMID   24312405.
  108. ↑ Bell, Karen L.; Fowler, Julie; Burgess, Kevin S.; Dobbs, Emily K.; Gruenewald, David; Lawley, Brice; Morozumi, Connor; Brosi, Berry J. (2017). "Applying Pollen DNA Metabarcoding to the Study of Plant–Pollinator Interactions". Applications in Plant Sciences. 5 (6). doi:10.3732/apps.1600124. PMC   5499302 . PMID   28690929. S2CID   6590244.
  109. ↑ Pornon, André; Escaravage, Nathalie; Burrus, Monique; Holota, Hélène; Khimoun, Aurélie; Mariette, Jérome; Pellizzari, Charlène; Iribar, Amaia; Etienne, Roselyne; Taberlet, Pierre; Vidal, Marie; Winterton, Peter; Zinger, Lucie; Andalo, Christophe (2016). "Using metabarcoding to reveal and quantify plant-pollinator interactions". Scientific Reports. 6: 27282. Bibcode:2016NatSR...627282P. doi:10.1038/srep27282. PMC   4891682 . PMID   27255732.
  110. ↑ Taberlet, Pierre (2018). Environmental DNA : for biodiversity research and monitoring. Oxford. ISBN   9780198767220.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  111. ↑ "WWF's Arnaud Lyet on measuring wildlife populations". World Wildlife Fund. Retrieved 26 November 2018.
  112. ↑ "eDNA – Not just for fisheries biologists anymore". wildlife.org. 8 December 2017. Retrieved 26 November 2018.
  113. ↑ Roth, Annie (19 November 2018). "How DNA from snow helps scientists track elusive animals". National Geographic. Archived from the original on 19 November 2018. Retrieved 26 November 2018.
  114. ↑ Franklin, Thomas W.; McKelvey, Kevin S.; Golding, Jessie D.; Mason, Daniel H.; Dysthe, Joseph C.; Pilgrim, Kristine L.; Squires, John R.; Aubry, Keith B.; Long, Robert A.; Greaves, Samuel E.; Raley, Catherine M.; Jackson, Scott; MacKay, Paula; Lisbon, Joshua; Sauder, Joel D.; Pruss, Michael T.; Heffington, Don; Schwartz, Michael K. (2019). "Using environmental DNA methods to improve winter surveys for rare carnivores: DNA from snow and improved noninvasive techniques". Biological Conservation. 229: 50–58. Bibcode:2019BCons.229...50F. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.11.006 . S2CID   91312879. CC-BY icon.svg Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  115. ↑ Lynggaard, Christina; Bertelsen, Mads Frost; Jensen, Casper V.; Johnson, Matthew S.; Frøslev, Tobias Guldberg; Olsen, Morten Tange; Bohmann, Kristine (6 January 2022). "Airborne environmental DNA for terrestrial vertebrate community monitoring". Current Biology. 32 (3): 701–707.e5. Bibcode:2022CBio...32E.701L. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2021.12.014. PMC   8837273 . PMID   34995490. S2CID   245772800.
  116. ↑ Clare, Elizabeth L.; Economou, Chloe K.; Bennett, Frances J.; Dyer, Caitlin E.; Adams, Katherine; McRobie, Benjamin; Drinkwater, Rosie; Littlefair, Joanne E. (January 2022). "Measuring biodiversity from DNA in the air". Current Biology. 32 (3): 693–700.e5. Bibcode:2022CBio...32E.693C. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.11.064 . PMID   34995488. S2CID   245772825.
  117. ↑ Clare, Elizabeth L.; Economou, Chloe K.; Faulkes, Chris G.; Gilbert, James D.; Bennett, Frances; Drinkwater, Rosie; Littlefair, Joanne E. (2021). "EDNAir: Proof of concept that animal DNA can be collected from air sampling". PeerJ. 9: e11030. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11030 . PMC   8019316 . PMID   33850648. CC-BY icon.svg Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  118. ↑ Researchers can now collect and sequence DNA from the air Live Science , 6 April 2021.
  119. ↑ Métris, Kimberly L.; Métris, Jérémy (14 April 2023). "Aircraft surveys for air eDNA: probing biodiversity in the sky". PeerJ. 11: e15171. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15171 . ISSN   2167-8359. PMC   10108859 . PMID   37077310.
  120. ↑ Kenneth T. Frank; Brian Petrie; Jae S. Choi; William C. Leggett (2005). "Trophic Cascades in a Formerly Cod-Dominated Ecosystem". Science. 308 (5728): 1621–1623. Bibcode:2005Sci...308.1621F. doi:10.1126/science.1113075. PMID   15947186. S2CID   45088691.
  121. ↑ Walters, Carl; Maguire, Jean-Jacques (1996). "Lessons for stock assessment from the northern cod collapse". Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries. 6 (2). doi:10.1007/BF00182340. S2CID   20224324.
  122. ↑ ICES (2018). "NEAFC request on updated advice for cod (Gadus morhua) in Subdivision 5.b.1 (Faroe Plateau)" (PDF). doi:10.17895/ices.pub.4651.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  123. ↑ Heessen, Henk J. L.; Daan, Niels; Ellis, Jim R. (September 2015). Fish atlas of the Celtic Sea, North Sea, and Baltic Sea: Based on international research-vessel surveys. Brill. ISBN   9789086868780.
  124. ↑ Pusceddu, A.; Bianchelli, S.; Martin, J.; Puig, P.; Palanques, A.; Masque, P.; Danovaro, R. (2014). "Chronic and intensive bottom trawling impairs deep-sea biodiversity and ecosystem functioning". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 111 (24): 8861–8866. Bibcode:2014PNAS..111.8861P. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1405454111 . PMC   4066481 . PMID   24843122.
  125. ↑ Arreguin-sanchez, Francisco (1996). "Catchability: A key parameter for fish stock assessment". Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries. 6 (2). doi:10.1007/BF00182344. S2CID   9589700.
  126. 1 2 3 4 Salter, Ian; Joensen, Mourits; Kristiansen, Regin; Steingrund, Petur; Vestergaard, Poul (2019). "Environmental DNA concentrations are correlated with regional biomass of Atlantic cod in oceanic waters". Communications Biology. 2: 461. doi:10.1038/s42003-019-0696-8. PMC   6904555 . PMID   31840106. CC-BY icon.svg Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  127. ↑ Goldberg, Caren S.; Pilliod, David S.; Arkle, Robert S.; Waits, Lisette P. (2011). "Molecular Detection of Vertebrates in Stream Water: A Demonstration Using Rocky Mountain Tailed Frogs and Idaho Giant Salamanders". PLOS ONE. 6 (7): e22746. Bibcode:2011PLoSO...622746G. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022746 . PMC   3144250 . PMID   21818382.
  128. ↑ Valentini, Alice; Taberlet, Pierre; Miaud, Claude; Civade, Raphaël; Herder, Jelger; Thomsen, Philip Francis; Bellemain, Eva; Besnard, Aurélien; Coissac, Eric; Boyer, Frédéric; Gaboriaud, Coline; Jean, Pauline; Poulet, Nicolas; Roset, Nicolas; Copp, Gordon H.; Geniez, Philippe; Pont, Didier; Argillier, Christine; Baudoin, Jean-Marc; Peroux, Tiphaine; Crivelli, Alain J.; Olivier, Anthony; Acqueberge, Manon; Le Brun, Matthieu; Møller, Peter R.; Willerslev, Eske; Dejean, Tony (2016). "Next-generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding" (PDF). Molecular Ecology. 25 (4): 929–942. Bibcode:2016MolEc..25..929V. doi:10.1111/mec.13428. PMID   26479867. S2CID   2801412.
  129. ↑ Goodwin, Kelly D.; Thompson, Luke R.; Duarte, Bernardo; Kahlke, Tim; Thompson, Andrew R.; Marques, João C.; Caçador, Isabel (2017). "DNA Sequencing as a Tool to Monitor Marine Ecological Status". Frontiers in Marine Science. 4. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2017.00107 . hdl: 10453/125704 . S2CID   27034312.
  130. ↑ Stoeckle, Mark Y.; Soboleva, Lyubov; Charlop-Powers, Zachary (2017). "Aquatic environmental DNA detects seasonal fish abundance and habitat preference in an urban estuary". PLOS ONE. 12 (4): e0175186. Bibcode:2017PLoSO..1275186S. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175186 . PMC   5389620 . PMID   28403183.
  131. ↑ Thomsen, Philip Francis; Kielgast, Jos; Iversen, Lars Lønsmann; Møller, Peter Rask; Rasmussen, Morten; Willerslev, Eske (2012). "Detection of a Diverse Marine Fish Fauna Using Environmental DNA from Seawater Samples". PLOS ONE. 7 (8): e41732. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...741732T. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041732 . PMC   3430657 . PMID   22952584.
  132. 1 2 Thomsen, Philip Francis; Møller, Peter Rask; Sigsgaard, Eva Egelyng; Knudsen, Steen Wilhelm; Jørgensen, Ole Ankjær; Willerslev, Eske (2016). "Environmental DNA from Seawater Samples Correlate with Trawl Catches of Subarctic, Deepwater Fishes". PLOS ONE. 11 (11): e0165252. Bibcode:2016PLoSO..1165252T. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165252 . PMC   5112899 . PMID   27851757.
  133. 1 2 Sigsgaard, Eva Egelyng; Nielsen, Ida Broman; Carl, Henrik; Krag, Marcus Anders; Knudsen, Steen Wilhelm; Xing, Yingchun; Holm-Hansen, Tore Hejl; Møller, Peter Rask; Thomsen, Philip Francis (2017). "Seawater environmental DNA reflects seasonality of a coastal fish community". Marine Biology. 164 (6): 128. Bibcode:2017MarBi.164..128S. doi:10.1007/s00227-017-3147-4. S2CID   89773962.
  134. ↑ Takahara, Teruhiko; Minamoto, Toshifumi; Yamanaka, Hiroki; Doi, Hideyuki; Kawabata, Zen'Ichiro (2012). "Estimation of Fish Biomass Using Environmental DNA". PLOS ONE. 7 (4): e35868. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...735868T. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035868 . PMC   3338542 . PMID   22563411.
  135. ↑ Doi, Hideyuki; Uchii, Kimiko; Takahara, Teruhiko; Matsuhashi, Saeko; Yamanaka, Hiroki; Minamoto, Toshifumi (2015). "Use of Droplet Digital PCR for Estimation of Fish Abundance and Biomass in Environmental DNA Surveys". PLOS ONE. 10 (3): e0122763. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1022763D. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122763 . PMC   4370432 . PMID   25799582.
  136. ↑ Lacoursière-Roussel, Anaïs; Rosabal, Maikel; Bernatchez, Louis (2016). "Estimating fish abundance and biomass from eDNA concentrations: Variability among capture methods and environmental conditions". Molecular Ecology Resources. 16 (6): 1401–1414. doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12522. PMID   26946353. S2CID   4507565.
  137. ↑ Maruyama, Atsushi; Nakamura, Keisuke; Yamanaka, Hiroki; Kondoh, Michio; Minamoto, Toshifumi (2014). "The Release Rate of Environmental DNA from Juvenile and Adult Fish". PLOS ONE. 9 (12): e114639. Bibcode:2014PLoSO...9k4639M. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114639 . PMC   4257714 . PMID   25479160.
  138. ↑ Klymus, Katy E.; Richter, Catherine A.; Chapman, Duane C.; Paukert, Craig (2015). "Quantification of eDNA shedding rates from invasive bighead carp Hypophthalmichthys nobilis and silver carp Hypophthalmichthys molitrix". Biological Conservation. 183: 77–84. Bibcode:2015BCons.183...77K. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.020.
  139. ↑ Li, Jianlong; Lawson Handley, Lori J.; Harper, Lynsey R.; Brys, Rein; Watson, Hayley V.; Di Muri, Cristina; Zhang, Xiang; Hänfling, Bernd (2019). "Limited dispersion and quick degradation of environmental DNA in fish ponds inferred by metabarcoding". Environmental DNA. 1 (3): 238–250. doi: 10.1002/edn3.24 . S2CID   198403033.
  140. ↑ Salter, Ian (2018). "Seasonal variability in the persistence of dissolved environmental DNA (EDNA) in a marine system: The role of microbial nutrient limitation". PLOS ONE. 13 (2): e0192409. Bibcode:2018PLoSO..1392409S. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192409 . PMC   5825020 . PMID   29474423.
  141. ↑ Buxton, Andrew S.; Groombridge, Jim J.; Griffiths, Richard A. (2018). "Seasonal variation in environmental DNA detection in sediment and water samples". PLOS ONE. 13 (1): e0191737. Bibcode:2018PLoSO..1391737B. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191737 . PMC   5774844 . PMID   29352294.
  142. ↑ Collins, Rupert A.; Wangensteen, Owen S.; o'Gorman, Eoin J.; Mariani, Stefano; Sims, David W.; Genner, Martin J. (2018). "Persistence of environmental DNA in marine systems". Communications Biology. 1: 185. doi:10.1038/s42003-018-0192-6. PMC   6218555 . PMID   30417122.
  143. 1 2 Andruszkiewicz, Elizabeth A.; Koseff, Jeffrey R.; Fringer, Oliver B.; Ouellette, Nicholas T.; Lowe, Anna B.; Edwards, Christopher A.; Boehm, Alexandria B. (2019). "Modeling Environmental DNA Transport in the Coastal Ocean Using Lagrangian Particle Tracking". Frontiers in Marine Science. 6. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00477 . S2CID   199447701.
  144. ↑ Eichmiller, Jessica J.; Bajer, Przemyslaw G.; Sorensen, Peter W. (2014). "The Relationship between the Distribution of Common Carp and Their Environmental DNA in a Small Lake". PLOS ONE. 9 (11): e112611. Bibcode:2014PLoSO...9k2611E. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112611 . PMC   4226586 . PMID   25383965.
  145. ↑ Gargan, Laura M.; Morato, Telmo; Pham, Christopher K.; Finarelli, John A.; Carlsson, Jeanette E. L.; Carlsson, Jens (2017). "Development of a sensitive detection method to survey pelagic biodiversity using eDNA and quantitative PCR: A case study of devil ray at seamounts". Marine Biology. 164 (5): 112. Bibcode:2017MarBi.164..112G. doi:10.1007/s00227-017-3141-x. S2CID   91149351.
  146. ↑ Yamamoto, Satoshi; Minami, Kenji; Fukaya, Keiichi; Takahashi, Kohji; Sawada, Hideki; Murakami, Hiroaki; Tsuji, Satsuki; Hashizume, Hiroki; Kubonaga, Shou; Horiuchi, Tomoya; Hongo, Masamichi; Nishida, Jo; Okugawa, Yuta; Fujiwara, Ayaka; Fukuda, Miho; Hidaka, Shunsuke; Suzuki, Keita W.; Miya, Masaki; Araki, Hitoshi; Yamanaka, Hiroki; Maruyama, Atsushi; Miyashita, Kazushi; Masuda, Reiji; Minamoto, Toshifumi; Kondoh, Michio (2016). "Environmental DNA as a 'Snapshot' of Fish Distribution: A Case Study of Japanese Jack Mackerel in Maizuru Bay, Sea of Japan". PLOS ONE. 11 (3): e0149786. Bibcode:2016PLoSO..1149786Y. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149786 . PMC   4775019 . PMID   26933889. S2CID   5168061.
  147. 1 2 Knudsen, Steen Wilhelm; Ebert, Rasmus Bach; Hesselsøe, Martin; Kuntke, Franziska; Hassingboe, Jakob; Mortensen, Peter Bondgaard; Thomsen, Philip Francis; Sigsgaard, Eva Egelyng; Hansen, Brian Klitgaard; Nielsen, Einar Eg; Møller, Peter Rask (2019). "Species-specific detection and quantification of environmental DNA from marine fishes in the Baltic Sea". Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 510: 31–45. doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2018.09.004. S2CID   92601423.
  148. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Corinaldesi, C.; Tangherlini, M.; Manea, E.; Dell'Anno, A. (2018). "Extracellular DNA as a genetic recorder of microbial diversity in benthic deep-sea ecosystems". Scientific Reports. 8 (1): 1839. Bibcode:2018NatSR...8.1839C. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-20302-7. PMC   5789842 . PMID   29382896. CC-BY icon.svg Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  149. 1 2 Dell'Anno, A.; Danovaro, R. (2005). "Extracellular DNA Plays a Key Role in Deep-Sea Ecosystem Functioning". Science. 309 (5744): 2179. doi:10.1126/science.1117475. PMID   16195451. S2CID   39216262.
  150. ↑ Corinaldesi, Cinzia; Dell'Anno, Antonio; Danovaro, Roberto (2007). "Viral infection plays a key role in extracellular DNA dynamics in marine anoxic systems". Limnology and Oceanography. 52 (2): 508–516. Bibcode:2007LimOc..52..508C. doi: 10.4319/lo.2007.52.2.0508 . S2CID   85601366.
  151. ↑ Dell'Anno, Antonio; Corinaldesi, Cinzia; Danovaro, Roberto (2015). "Virus decomposition provides an important contribution to benthic deep-sea ecosystem functioning". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 112 (16): E2014–E2019. Bibcode:2015PNAS..112E2014D. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1422234112 . PMC   4413343 . PMID   25848024.
  152. ↑ Nielsen, Kaare M.; Johnsen, Pål J.; Bensasson, Douda; Daffonchio, Daniele (2007). "Release and persistence of extracellular DNA in the environment". Environmental Biosafety Research. 6 (1–2): 37–53. doi: 10.1051/ebr:2007031 . PMID   17961479.
  153. ↑ Coolen, Marco J. L.; Overmann, Jörg (1998). "Analysis of Subfossil Molecular Remains of Purple Sulfur Bacteria in a Lake Sediment". Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 64 (11): 4513–4521. Bibcode:1998ApEnM..64.4513C. doi:10.1128/AEM.64.11.4513-4521.1998. PMC   106678 . PMID   9797316.
  154. ↑ Coolen, M.; Muyzer, Gerard; Rijpstra, W. Irene C.; Schouten, Stefan; Volkman, John K.; Sinninghe Damsté, Jaap S. (2004). "Combined DNA and lipid analyses of sediments reveal changes in Holocene haptophyte and diatom populations in an Antarctic lake". Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 223 (1–2): 225–239. Bibcode:2004E&PSL.223..225C. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2004.04.014.
  155. 1 2 Coolen, M. J. L.; Orsi, W. D.; Balkema, C.; Quince, C.; Harris, K.; Sylva, S. P.; Filipova-Marinova, M.; Giosan, L. (2013). "Evolution of the plankton paleome in the Black Sea from the Deglacial to Anthropocene". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 110 (21): 8609–8614. Bibcode:2013PNAS..110.8609C. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219283110 . PMC   3666672 . PMID   23650351.
  156. 1 2 Corinaldesi, C.; Tangherlini, M.; Luna, G. M.; Dell'Anno, A. (2014). "Extracellular DNA can preserve the genetic signatures of present and past viral infection events in deep hypersaline anoxic basins". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 281 (1780). doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.3299. PMC   4027399 . PMID   24523277. S2CID   1214760.
  157. 1 2 Boere, Arjan C.; Rijpstra, W. Irene C.; De Lange, Gert J.; Malinverno, Elisa; Sinninghe Damsté, Jaap S.; Coolen, Marco J. L. (2011). "Exploring preserved fossil dinoflagellate and haptophyte DNA signatures to infer ecological and environmental changes during deposition of sapropel S1 in the eastern Mediterranean" (PDF). Paleoceanography. 26 (2): n/a. Bibcode:2011PalOc..26.2204B. doi:10.1029/2010PA001948. S2CID   53599204.
  158. ↑ Coolen, M. J. L.; Cypionka, H.; Sass, A. M.; Sass, H.; Overmann, J. (2002). "Ongoing Modification of Mediterranean Pleistocene Sapropels Mediated by Prokaryotes". Science. 296 (5577): 2407–2410. Bibcode:2002Sci...296.2407C. doi:10.1126/science.1071893. PMID   12089447. S2CID   33722848.
  159. ↑ Coolen, Marco J. L.; Overmann, Jörg (2007). "217 000-year-old DNA sequences of green sulfur bacteria in Mediterranean sapropels and their implications for the reconstruction of the paleoenvironment". Environmental Microbiology. 9 (1): 238–249. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01134.x. hdl: 1912/1506 . PMID   17227428.
  160. ↑ Coolen, Marco J. L.; Volkman, John K.; Abbas, Ben; Muyzer, Gerard; Schouten, Stefan; Sinninghe Damsté, Jaap S. (2007). "Identification of organic matter sources in sulfidic late Holocene Antarctic fjord sediments from fossil rDNA sequence analysis". Paleoceanography. 22 (2): PA2211. Bibcode:2007PalOc..22.2211C. doi: 10.1029/2006PA001309 . hdl: 1912/3447 .
  161. ↑ Coolen, Marco J.L.; Saenz, James P.; Giosan, Liviu; Trowbridge, Nan Y.; Dimitrov, Petko; Dimitrov, Dimitar; Eglinton, Timothy I. (2009). "DNA and lipid molecular stratigraphic records of haptophyte succession in the Black Sea during the Holocene". Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 284 (3–4): 610–621. Bibcode:2009E&PSL.284..610C. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2009.05.029.
  162. ↑ Dell'Anno, Antonio; Corinaldesi, Cinzia; Stavrakakis, Spyros; Lykousis, Vasilis; Danovaro, Roberto (2005). "Pelagic-Benthic Coupling and Diagenesis of Nucleic Acids in a Deep-Sea Continental Margin and an Open-Slope System of the Eastern Mediterranean". Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 71 (10): 6070–6076. Bibcode:2005ApEnM..71.6070D. doi:10.1128/AEM.71.10.6070-6076.2005. PMC   1265925 . PMID   16204523.
  163. ↑ Levin, Lisa A.; Liu, Kon-Kee; Emeis, Kay-Christian; Breitburg, Denise L.; Cloern, James; Deutsch, Curtis; Giani, Michele; Goffart, Anne; Hofmann, Eileen E.; Lachkar, Zouhair; Limburg, Karin; Liu, Su-Mei; Montes, Enrique; Naqvi, Wajih; Ragueneau, Olivier; Rabouille, Christophe; Sarkar, Santosh Kumar; Swaney, Dennis P.; Wassman, Paul; Wishner, Karen F. (2015). "Comparative biogeochemistry–ecosystem–human interactions on dynamic continental margins". Journal of Marine Systems. 141: 3–17. Bibcode:2015JMS...141....3L. doi:10.1016/j.jmarsys.2014.04.016. S2CID   7139186.
  164. ↑ Jørgensen, Bo Barker; Boetius, Antje (2007). "Feast and famine — microbial life in the deep-sea bed". Nature Reviews Microbiology. 5 (10): 770–781. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1745. PMID   17828281. S2CID   22970703.
  165. ↑ Orcutt, B. N.; Sylvan, J. B.; Knab, N. J.; Edwards, K. J. (2011). "Microbial Ecology of the Dark Ocean above, at, and below the Seafloor". Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 75 (2): 361–422. doi:10.1128/MMBR.00039-10. PMC   3122624 . PMID   21646433.
  166. ↑ Corinaldesi, Cinzia (2015). "New perspectives in benthic deep-sea microbial ecology". Frontiers in Marine Science. 2. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2015.00017 . S2CID   2350681.
  167. ↑ Zinger, Lucie; Amaral-Zettler, Linda A.; Fuhrman, Jed A.; Horner-Devine, M. Claire; Huse, Susan M.; Welch, David B. Mark; Martiny, Jennifer B. H.; Sogin, Mitchell; Boetius, Antje; Ramette, Alban (2011). "Global Patterns of Bacterial Beta-Diversity in Seafloor and Seawater Ecosystems". PLOS ONE. 6 (9): e24570. Bibcode:2011PLoSO...624570Z. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024570 . PMC   3169623 . PMID   21931760.
  168. ↑ Bienhold, Christina; Boetius, Antje; Ramette, Alban (2012). "The energy–diversity relationship of complex bacterial communities in Arctic deep-sea sediments". The ISME Journal. 6 (4): 724–732. Bibcode:2012ISMEJ...6..724B. doi:10.1038/ismej.2011.140. PMC   3309351 . PMID   22071347.
  169. ↑ Zinger, L.; Boetius, A.; Ramette, A. (2014). "Bacterial taxa–area and distance–decay relationships in marine environments". Molecular Ecology. 23 (4): 954–964. Bibcode:2014MolEc..23..954Z. doi:10.1111/mec.12640. PMC   4230465 . PMID   24460915.
  170. ↑ Drummond, Alexei J.; Newcomb, Richard D.; Buckley, Thomas R.; Xie, Dong; Dopheide, Andrew; Potter, Benjamin CM; Heled, Joseph; Ross, Howard A.; Tooman, Leah; Grosser, Stefanie; Park, Duckchul; Demetras, Nicholas J.; Stevens, Mark I.; Russell, James C.; Anderson, Sandra H.; Carter, Anna; Nelson, Nicola (2015). "Evaluating a multigene environmental DNA approach for biodiversity assessment". GigaScience. 4: 46. doi: 10.1186/s13742-015-0086-1 . PMC   4595072 . PMID   26445670. S2CID   28846124.
  171. ↑ Corinaldesi, C.; Beolchini, F.; Dell'Anno, A. (2008). "Damage and degradation rates of extracellular DNA in marine sediments: Implications for the preservation of gene sequences". Molecular Ecology. 17 (17): 3939–3951. Bibcode:2008MolEc..17.3939C. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03880.x. PMID   18643876. S2CID   22062643.
  172. ↑ Pedersen, Mikkel Winther; Overballe-Petersen, Søren; Ermini, Luca; Sarkissian, Clio Der; Haile, James; Hellstrom, Micaela; Spens, Johan; Thomsen, Philip Francis; Bohmann, Kristine; Cappellini, Enrico; Schnell, Ida Bærholm; Wales, Nathan A.; Carøe, Christian; Campos, Paula F.; Schmidt, Astrid M. Z.; Gilbert, M. Thomas P.; Hansen, Anders J.; Orlando, Ludovic; Willerslev, Eske (2015). "Ancient and modern environmental DNA". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 370 (1660). doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0383. PMC   4275890 . PMID   25487334.
  173. ↑ Parducci, Laura; Bennett, Keith D.; Ficetola, Gentile Francesco; Alsos, Inger Greve; Suyama, Yoshihisa; Wood, Jamie R.; Pedersen, Mikkel Winther (2017). "Ancient plant DNA in lake sediments". New Phytologist. 214 (3): 924–942. doi: 10.1111/nph.14470 . hdl: 10023/13063 . PMID   28370025.
  174. ↑ Armbrecht, Linda H.; Coolen, Marco J.L.; Lejzerowicz, Franck; George, Simon C.; Negandhi, Karita; Suzuki, Yohey; Young, Jennifer; Foster, Nicole R.; Armand, Leanne K.; Cooper, Alan; Ostrowski, Martin; Focardi, Amaranta; Stat, Michael; Moreau, John W.; Weyrich, Laura S. (2019). "Ancient DNA from marine sediments: Precautions and considerations for seafloor coring, sample handling and data generation". Earth-Science Reviews. 196: 102887. Bibcode:2019ESRv..19602887A. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.102887. hdl: 10453/134221 . S2CID   198406152.
  175. ↑ De Vargas, C.; et al. (2015). "Eukaryotic plankton diversity in the sunlit ocean". Science. 348 (6237). doi:10.1126/science.1261605. hdl: 10261/117736 . PMID   25999516. S2CID   12853481.
  176. ↑ Iversen, M. H.; Ploug, H. (2010). "Ballast minerals and the sinking carbon flux in the ocean: Carbon-specific respiration rates and sinking velocity of marine snow aggregates". Biogeosciences. 7 (9): 2613–2624. Bibcode:2010BGeo....7.2613I. doi: 10.5194/bg-7-2613-2010 .
  177. ↑ Takahashi, Kozo; Be, Allan W.H. (1984). "Planktonic foraminifera: Factors controlling sinking speeds". Deep Sea Research Part A. Oceanographic Research Papers. 31 (12): 1477–1500. Bibcode:1984DSRA...31.1477T. doi:10.1016/0198-0149(84)90083-9.
  178. 1 2 De Schepper, Stijn; Ray, Jessica L.; Skaar, Katrine Sandnes; Sadatzki, Henrik; Ijaz, Umer Z.; Stein, Ruediger; Larsen, Aud (2019). "The potential of sedimentary ancient DNA for reconstructing past sea ice evolution". The ISME Journal. 13 (10): 2566–2577. Bibcode:2019ISMEJ..13.2566D. doi:10.1038/s41396-019-0457-1. PMC   6776040 . PMID   31235841.
  179. 1 2 3 Barrenechea Angeles, Inès; Lejzerowicz, Franck; Cordier, Tristan; Scheplitz, Janin; Kucera, Michal; Ariztegui, Daniel; Pawlowski, Jan; Morard, Raphaël (2020). "Planktonic foraminifera eDNA signature deposited on the seafloor remains preserved after burial in marine sediments". Scientific Reports. 10 (1): 20351. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-77179-8. PMC   7684305 . PMID   33230106. CC-BY icon.svg Modified text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  180. 1 2 Briggs, Lisa (2020). "Ancient DNA Research in Maritime and Underwater Archaeology: Pitfalls, Promise, and Future Directions". Open Quaternary. 6. doi: 10.5334/oq.71 . S2CID   213677121.
  181. 1 2 Morard, Raphaël; Lejzerowicz, Franck; Darling, Kate F.; Lecroq-Bennet, Béatrice; Winther Pedersen, Mikkel; Orlando, Ludovic; Pawlowski, Jan; Mulitza, Stefan; De Vargas, Colomban; Kucera, Michal (2017). "Planktonic foraminifera-derived environmental DNA extracted from abyssal sediments preserves patterns of plankton macroecology". Biogeosciences. 14 (11): 2741–2754. Bibcode:2017BGeo...14.2741M. doi: 10.5194/bg-14-2741-2017 . hdl: 10023/11053 . S2CID   55213856.
  182. 1 2 Corinaldesi, C.; Beolchini, F.; Dell'Anno, A. (2008). "Damage and degradation rates of extracellular DNA in marine sediments: Implications for the preservation of gene sequences". Molecular Ecology. 17 (17): 3939–3951. Bibcode:2008MolEc..17.3939C. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03880.x. PMID   18643876. S2CID   22062643.
  183. 1 2 Corinaldesi, Cinzia; Dell'Anno, Antonio; Danovaro, Roberto (2007). "Early diagenesis and trophic role of extracellular DNA in different benthic ecosystems". Limnology and Oceanography. 52 (4): 1710–1717. Bibcode:2007LimOc..52.1710C. doi:10.4319/lo.2007.52.4.1710. S2CID   53631156.
  184. 1 2 Corinaldesi, C.; Barucca, M.; Luna, G. M.; Dell'Anno, A. (2011). "Preservation, origin and genetic imprint of extracellular DNA in permanently anoxic deep-sea sediments". Molecular Ecology. 20 (3): 642–654. Bibcode:2011MolEc..20..642C. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04958.x. PMID   21155913. S2CID   22920579.
  185. ↑ Guillou, Laure; et al. (2012). "The Protist Ribosomal Reference database (PR2): A catalog of unicellular eukaryote Small Sub-Unit rRNA sequences with curated taxonomy". Nucleic Acids Research. 41 (Database issue): D597–D604. doi:10.1093/nar/gks1160. PMC   3531120 . PMID   23193267.
  186. ↑ Schiebel, Ralf; Hemleben, Christoph (17 February 2017). Planktic Foraminifers in the Modern Ocean. Springer. ISBN   978-3-662-50297-6.
  187. ↑ Morard, Raphaël; Darling, Kate F.; Mahé, Frédéric; Audic, Stéphane; Ujiié, Yurika; Weiner, Agnes K. M.; André, Aurore; Seears, Heidi A.; Wade, Christopher M.; Quillévéré, Frédéric; Douady, Christophe J.; Escarguel, Gilles; De Garidel-Thoron, Thibault; Siccha, Michael; Kucera, Michal; De Vargas, Colomban (2015). "PFR2: A curated database of planktonic foraminifera 18S ribosomal DNA as a resource for studies of plankton ecology, biogeography and evolution" (PDF). Molecular Ecology Resources. 15 (6): 1472–1485. doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12410. PMID   25828689. S2CID   39066123.
  188. ↑ Morard, Raphaël; Vollmar, Nele M.; Greco, Mattia; Kucera, Michal (2019). "Unassigned diversity of planktonic foraminifera from environmental sequencing revealed as known but neglected species". PLOS ONE. 14 (3): e0213936. Bibcode:2019PLoSO..1413936M. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213936 . PMC   6428320 . PMID   30897140.
  189. ↑ Rutherford, Scott; d'Hondt, Steven; Prell, Warren (1999). "Environmental controls on the geographic distribution of zooplankton diversity". Nature. 400 (6746): 749–753. Bibcode:1999Natur.400..749R. doi:10.1038/23449. S2CID   4418045.
  190. ↑ Siccha, Michael; Kucera, Michal (2017). "ForCenS, a curated database of planktonic foraminifera census counts in marine surface sediment samples". Scientific Data. 4: 170109. Bibcode:2017NatSD...470109S. doi:10.1038/sdata.2017.109. PMC   5566098 . PMID   28829434.
  191. ↑ Lejzerowicz, Franck; Esling, Philippe; Majewski, Wojciech; Szczuciński, Witold; Decelle, Johan; Obadia, Cyril; Arbizu, Pedro Martinez; Pawlowski, Jan (2013). "Ancient DNA complements microfossil record in deep-sea subsurface sediments". Biology Letters. 9 (4). doi:10.1098/rsbl.2013.0283. PMC   3730641 . PMID   23658006.
  192. ↑ Pawłowska, J.; Lejzerowicz, F.; Esling, P.; Szczuciński, W.; Zajączkowski, M.; Pawlowski, J. (2014). "Ancient DNA sheds new light on the Svalbard foraminiferal fossil record of the last millennium". Geobiology. 12 (4): 277–288. Bibcode:2014Gbio...12..277P. doi:10.1111/gbi.12087. PMID   24730667. S2CID   205140049.
  193. ↑ Pawłowska, Joanna; Zajączkowski, Marek; Łącka, Magdalena; Lejzerowicz, Franck; Esling, Philippe; Pawlowski, Jan (2016). "Palaeoceanographic changes in Hornsund Fjord (Spitsbergen, Svalbard) over the last millennium: New insights from ancient DNA". Climate of the Past. 12 (7): 1459–1472. Bibcode:2016CliPa..12.1459P. doi: 10.5194/cp-12-1459-2016 . S2CID   43985949.
  194. ↑ Szczuciński, Witold; Pawłowska, Joanna; Lejzerowicz, Franck; Nishimura, Yuichi; Kokociński, Mikołaj; Majewski, Wojciech; Nakamura, Yugo; Pawlowski, Jan (2016). "Ancient sedimentary DNA reveals past tsunami deposits". Marine Geology. 381: 29–33. Bibcode:2016MGeol.381...29S. doi: 10.1016/j.margeo.2016.08.006 .
  195. ↑ Nunn, Jack (2020). "Science for All - Publicly funded research report (June 2018-December 2019)". Figshare. doi:10.26181/5eba630a64e08.

Further references

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.