Fidentius of Padua

Last updated
Fidentius presenting his book to Pope Nicholas. From a presentation miniature within a historiated initial in the only manuscript copy. Fidentius of Padua.png
Fidentius presenting his book to Pope Nicholas. From a presentation miniature within a historiated initial in the only manuscript copy.

Fidentius of Padua (Italian : Fidenzio da Padova) was a Franciscan administrator and writer active in the Holy Land between 1266 and 1291. He wrote a tract on the Christian recovery and retention of the Holy Land.

Contents

Biography

Fidentius may have been a native of Padua or its region, or else was attached to a convent there. He was born before 1226. In June 1266, he was made vicar provincial of the Holy Land, an office restricted by the Franciscan rule to those at least forty years old. [1] That same year, acting on the request of the Templar grand master Thomas Bérard, he sent two friars to the besieged castle of Safad to serve as chaplains. [1] [2]

In 1268, Fidentius was in Tripoli when he received a copy of the Liber Clementis , probably in Arabic, from a Syrian Christian. [1] [3] On learning of the fall of Antioch (18 May 1268), he left Tripoli to visit the Christians captured by Sultan Baybars I to provide for their spiritual needs. [1] [4] He shadowed Baybars' army on horseback for several days, possibly also acting as an ambassador of the Crusader states. The firmans issued by Baybars favouring the Franciscans may be the product of his work. [4]

By 1274, he was back in Europe. He attended the Second Council of Lyon and at the first session on 7 May was commissioned by Pope Gregory X to write a report on recovering lost territory in the Holy Land. [1] [4] It is probable that he had met the future pope on his mission to the Holy Land in 1271. [4] Fidentius appears to have visited the convent of Saint Anthony in Padua in 1283. He was back in the Holy Land again in 1289, when he visited the prisoners-of-war after the fall of Tripoli on 26 April. It was only in 1290 or 1291, shortly before the fall of Acre, that he delivered his report, Liber recuperationis Terre Sancte, to Pope Nicholas IV. [1] The report was probably written in the Holy Land, mainly in Acre. [5] He was still there in February 1290, since he refers to the invasion of Cilician Armenia that took place that month in his Liber. [4]

A Fidentius who undertook some missions in Italy is mentioned in the records of the convent of Saint Anthony in Padua in 1294, although it may have been a different person. [1] The Blessed Fidentius mentioned in some sources must be a different person, since he was clearly dead before 1249. The Franciscan vicar must have died after 1291, probably in Padua. [4]

Liber recuperationis Terre Sancte

The Liber recuperationis Terre Sancte—or On the Recovery of the Holy Land—survives in a single parchment manuscript of the 14th century, now in Paris, Bibliothèque nationale de France, Lat. 7242, at folios 85r–126r. It is written in Latin. [1] It begins with a dedication to Nicholas IV. [4] A schematic map of the Mediterranean appears on folio 122v. [6] [7] The text has been edited by Girolamo Golubovich. [1] It is one of the earliest examples of the De recuperatione genre. [8]

The military focus of Fidentius' plan contrasts with the missionary ideal more typical of the Franciscans. This may explain in part why his work appears to have had little influence. [4] His lack of zeal for martyrdom also contrasts with that of many Franciscans working in the Holy Land in the late 13th century. [1] Unlike more influential plans for the recovery of the Holy Land, such as those of Ramon Llull and Pierre Dubois, the Liber recuperationis is the only one based on firsthand experience of the land and interactions with its inhabitants, both Christian and Muslim. [4] Marino Sanudo probably had Fidentius' text before him when he wrote his own Liber secretorum fidelium crucis . [9]

History and geography

The Liber is divided into 94 chapters in seven chronologically-arranged sections that clearly divide into two functional parts. The first six sections are the first part and cover the history of the Holy Land under the Gentiles, Jews, Assyrians, Romans, Greeks and Saracens. [1] [4] The last two are more fully developed than the first four. The Greek section is devoted largely to the question of how the Christians lost the Holy Land. The blame falls primarily on moral decline. [1] There follows an explanation for why the Christians should rightly repossess them. The Saracen section is devoted to the life of Muḥammad, for which he depends on the writings of Peter the Venerable. His account is mostly legendary, and he is apparently unfamiliar with Islamic tradition. [4] He draws on John of Damascus, Jacques de Vitry and possibly Mark of Toledo and Petrus Alphonsi. [1] His history of Islam bears a resemblance to William of Tripoli's De statu sarracenorum, which was drawn up for the occasion of the Second Council of Lyon. [10] He records that Muḥammad effectively created the Islamic religion out of what he learned from a Nestorian Christian monk named Sergius and three Jews of Mecca. [4] He did know Arabic, and quotes from the Qurʾān to describe the seven vices he attributes to Muslims: infidelity, lewdness, cruelty, greed, overconfidence, foolishness and volatility. He also backs up his account with personal experiences. [1]

The seventh section, on the rule of the Crusaders, forms the second part of the Liber and is devoted to the history of the Crusades and the recovery and permanent defence of Christian rule. [1] [4] His history is designed to provide exempla (examples) to be imitated or avoided by future Crusaders. He describes seven routes from western Europe to the Holy Land, pointing out the location of enemy fortresses, the potential allies along the way and the logistical difficulties unique to each. [8] His basic prescription is for a joint land and naval campaign. An army would move overland following the same route as the First Crusaders, joining up with the Cilician Armenians, Georgians and Mongols, while a fleet would be operating out of some eastern Mediterranean port. [1]

Fidentius includes some chapters on the topography of the Holy Land, especially of its cities, which would be important for planning the defence and maintenance of the conquests. [4] He stresses the importance of understanding the Muslim way of war and the climate of the Holy Land prior to any expedition. [4]

Military strategy

The maintenance of the conquests is of great concern to him. He suggests that each bishopric, abbey and city in the West should send one to three or more knights to serve in the East. [11] [12] He also specifies the need for infantry (specifically, spearmen and archers) and shield bearers to protect them from enemy archers. [13] It was important that cavalry and infantry operate together. [14] He lays great stress on the importance of archery, the weakness of Muslim infantry and the necessity of combined arms. [15] His tactical and strategic ideas are taken largely from Vegetius' De re militari , but he offers accounts of Egyptian Mamlūk tactics so Crusaders could better counter them. In particular, he warns about the feigned retreat. [8]

Control of the seas would be required for recovery of the Holy Land. For this Fidentius envisions a permanent fleet of ten galleys and a wartime fleet of forty to fifty (at a bare minimum thirty). [12] [16] These were to be based in Acre, Cyprus, Ruad and Rhodes. This fleet would enforce a blockade on trade between "evil" Christians and the Mamlūks. Fidentius sees this trade as helping the sultan of Egypt in two ways: from Europe he obtains war materiel (iron, tin, timber, oil) and from Asia he obtains dues on goods brought to Egypt via the Red Sea for trade to Europe. If the spice trade were deflected from the Red Sea to Mongol Persia, Egypt would be deprived of customs duties and would also lose export markets because of the reduction in shipping. The Mamlūk sultan may be unable to afford more mamlūk s (slave soldiers) imported from the Black Sea. Offensively, the fleet would launch attacks on Egypt to draw Egyptian forces away from the Holy Land. Fidentius was the first crusade theorist to advocate a naval blockade; and his strategy was that which would come to be known as the passagium particulare , a type of preparatory crusade. [16]

The Liber ignores completely the question of financing the expedition. [17]

Notes

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Paviot 2012.
  2. Riley-Smith 2014, p. 100.
  3. Williams 2000, p. 83 n. 10.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Simonelli 1997.
  5. Rubin 2018, p. 195.
  6. Dalché 2015, p. 157.
  7. An image of the map follows p. 88 in Dalché 2010.
  8. 1 2 3 Wallmeyer 2019, pp. 459–461.
  9. Bontea 2018, p. 213 n. 48.
  10. Wallmeyer 2019, p. 460 n. 41.
  11. Marshall 1992, p. 68.
  12. 1 2 Schein 1984, p. 98.
  13. Marshall 1992, p. 89.
  14. Marshall 1992, p. 169.
  15. Marshall 1992, pp. 171–172.
  16. 1 2 Bontea 2018, pp. 203–204.
  17. Wallmeyer 2019, pp. 463–464.

Bibliography

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eighth Crusade</span> Crusade against Ifriqiya in 1270

The Eighth Crusade was the second Crusade launched by Louis IX of France, this one against the Hafsid dynasty in Tunisia in 1270. It is also known as the Crusade of Louis IX Against Tunis or the Second Crusade of Louis. The Crusade did not see any significant fighting as King Louis died of dysentery shortly after arriving on the shores of Tunisia. The Treaty of Tunis was negotiated between the Crusaders and the Hafsids. No changes in territory occurred, though there were commercial and some political rights granted to the Christians. The Crusaders withdrew back to Europe soon after.

Bohemond VI, also known as the Fair, was the prince of Antioch and count of Tripoli from 1251 until his death. He ruled while Antioch was caught between the warring Mongol Empire and Mamluk Sultanate. He allied with the Mongols against the Muslim Mamluks and his Crusaders fought alongside the Mongols in their battles against the Mamluks. The Mamluks would achieve a historic victory against the Mongols and halt their advance westwards at the Battle of Ain Jalut. In 1268 Antioch was captured by the Mamluks under Baybars, and he was thenceforth a prince in exile. He was succeeded by his son, Bohemond VII.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lord Edward's crusade</span> European crusade to the Holy Land in the 1270s

Lord Edward's crusade, sometimes called the Ninth Crusade, was a military expedition to the Holy Land under the command of Edward, Duke of Gascony in 1271–1272. It was an extension of the Eighth Crusade and was the last of the Crusades to reach the Holy Land before the fall of Acre in 1291 brought an end to the permanent crusader presence there.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Second Council of Lyon</span> 14th ecumenical council of the Catholic Church (1272–74)

The Second Council of Lyon was the fourteenth ecumenical council of the Roman Catholic Church, convoked on 31 March 1272 and convened in Lyon, Kingdom of Arles, in 1274. Pope Gregory X presided over the council, called to act on a pledge by Byzantine emperor Michael VIII to reunite the Eastern church with the West. The council was attended by about 300 bishops, 60 abbots and more than a thousand prelates or their procurators, among whom were the representatives of the universities. Due to the great number of attendees, those who had come to Lyon without being specifically summoned were given "leave to depart with the blessing of God" and of the Pope. Among others who attended the council were James I of Aragon, the ambassador of the Emperor Michael VIII Palaiologos with members of the Greek clergy and the ambassadors of Abaqa Khan of the Ilkhanate. Thomas Aquinas had been summoned to the council, but died en route at Fossanova Abbey. Bonaventure was present at the first four sessions, but died at Lyon on 15 July 1274. As at the First Council of Lyon, Thomas Cantilupe was an English attendee and a papal chaplain.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Qalawun</span> Mamluk Sultan of Egypt and Syria (r.1279-1290)

Qalāwūn aṣ-Ṣāliḥī was the seventh Bahri Mamluk sultan; he ruled Egypt from 1279 to 1290. He was called al-Manṣūr Qalāwūn. After having risen in power in the Mamluk court and elite circles, Qalawun eventually held the title of "the victorious king" and gained de facto authority over the sultanate. The current sultan, Barakah was exiled and rumored to have been poisoned by Qalawun. He would then wage war against the Crusaders, capturing lands held by the County of Tripoli, and later totally defeating them in 1289. Acre, a major Crusader stronghold was besieged by Qalawun but would only be taken by his son al-Ashraf Khalil as the former died before the siege was won in 1291. His son Khalil succeeded him as sultan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of La Forbie</span> Battle in 1244

The Battle of La Forbie, also known as the Battle of Hiribya, was fought October 17, 1244 – October 18, 1244 between the allied armies and the Egyptian army of the Ayyubid Sultan as-Salih Ayyub, reinforced with Khwarezmian mercenaries. The resulting Ayyubid victory led to the call for the Seventh Crusade and marked the collapse of Christian power in the Holy Land.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Baybars</span> Sultan of Egypt and Syria from 1260 to 1277

Al-Malik al-Zahir Rukn al-Din Baybars al-Bunduqdari, commonly known as Baibars or Baybars and nicknamed Abu al-Futuh, was the fourth Mamluk sultan of Egypt and Syria, of Turkic Kipchak origin, in the Bahri dynasty, succeeding Qutuz. He was one of the commanders of the Egyptian forces that inflicted a defeat on the Seventh Crusade of King Louis IX of France. He also led the vanguard of the Egyptian army at the Battle of Ain Jalut in 1260, which marked the first substantial defeat of the Mongol army and is considered a turning point in history.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Franco-Mongol alliance</span> 13th century attempts at an alliance

Several attempts at a Franco-Mongol alliance against the Islamic caliphates, their common enemy, were made by various leaders among the Frankish Crusaders and the Mongol Empire in the 13th century. Such an alliance might have seemed an obvious choice: the Mongols were already sympathetic to Christianity, given the presence of many influential Nestorian Christians in the Mongol court. The Franks were open to the idea of support from the East, in part owing to the long-running legend of the mythical Prester John, an Eastern king in an Eastern kingdom who many believed would one day come to the assistance of the Crusaders in the Holy Land. The Franks and Mongols also shared a common enemy in the Muslims. However, despite many messages, gifts, and emissaries over the course of several decades, the often-proposed alliance never came to fruition.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fall of Tripoli (1289)</span>

The Fall of Tripoli was the capture and destruction of the Crusader state, the County of Tripoli, by the Muslim Mamluks. The battle occurred in 1289 and was an important event in the Crusades, as it marked the capture of one of the few remaining major possessions of the Crusaders. The event is represented in a rare surviving illustration from a now fragmentary manuscript known as the 'Cocharelli Codex', thought to have been created in Genoa in the 1330s. The image shows the countess Lucia, Countess of Tripoli and Bartholomew, Bishop of Tortosa sitting in state in the centre of the fortified city, and Qalawun's assault in 1289, with his army depicted massacring the inhabitants fleeing to boats in the harbour and to the nearby island of St Thomas.

<i>Crusade</i> (Young novel)

Crusade is a novel by Robyn Young set during the end of the ninth and final crusade. It was first published by Dutton in 2007.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fall of Ruad</span> Siege; brought the Crusader period to an end in the Holy Land

The fall of Ruad in 1302 was one of the culminating events of the Crusades in the Eastern Mediterranean. When the garrison on the tiny Isle of Ruad fell, it marked the loss of the last Crusader outpost on the coast of the Levant. In 1291, the Crusaders had lost their main power base at the coastal city of Acre, and the Muslim Mamluks had been systematically destroying any remaining Crusader ports and fortresses since then, forcing the Crusaders to relocate their dwindling Kingdom of Jerusalem to the island of Cyprus. In 1299–1300, the Cypriots sought to retake the Syrian port city of Tortosa, by setting up a staging area on Ruad, two miles (3 km) off the coast of Tortosa. The plans were to coordinate an offensive between the forces of the Crusaders, and those of the Ilkhanate. However, though the Crusaders successfully established a bridgehead on the island, the Mongols did not arrive, and the Crusaders were forced to withdraw the bulk of their forces to Cyprus. The Knights Templar set up a permanent garrison on the island in 1300, but the Mamluks besieged and captured Ruad in 1302. With the loss of the island, the Crusaders lost their last foothold in the Holy Land. Attempts at other Crusades continued for centuries, but the Europeans were never again able to occupy any territory in the Holy Land until the 20th century, during the events of World War I.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Galvano da Levanto</span>

Galvano da Levanto or Galvanus de Levanto was a Genoese physician and writer. Devoutly religious, he may have joined the Third Order of Saint Francis. Having suffered medical and financial problems, he sought the patronage of King Philip IV of France and later Pope Boniface VIII and the Curia romana. He wrote prolifically on medical and theological topics, but his most famous work today is his crusade treatise.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of Jerusalem during the Kingdom of Jerusalem</span> Aspect of history

The History of Jerusalem during the Kingdom of Jerusalem began with the siege of the city in 1099 as part of the First Crusade. This resulted in Jerusalem being conquered by Christian forces, after it had been under Muslim rule for nearly 450 years. It became the capital of the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem, until it was again conquered by the Ayyubids under Saladin in 1187. For the next forty years, a series of Christian campaigns, including the Third and Fifth Crusades, attempted in vain to retake the city, until Holy Roman Emperor Frederick II led the Sixth Crusade and successfully negotiated its return in 1229.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fall of Krak des Chevaliers</span>

The Crusader fortress of Krak des Chevaliers fell to the Mamluk sultan Baybars in 1271. Baybars went north to deal with Krak des Chevaliers after the death of Louis IX of France on 29 November 1270.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mongol Armenia</span>

Mongol Armenia or Ilkhanid Armenia refers to the period in which both Armenia and the Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia became tributary and vassal to the Mongol Empire in the 1230s. Armenia and Cilicia remained under Mongol influence until around 1335.

The Crusade of the Poor was an unauthorised military expedition—one of the so-called "popular crusades"—undertaken in the spring and summer of 1309 by members of the lower classes from England, Flanders, Brabant, northern France and the German Rhineland. Responding to an appeal for support for a crusade to the Holy Land, the men, overwhelmingly poor, marched to join a small professional army being assembled with Papal approval. Along the way, they engaged in looting, persecution of Jews and combat with local authorities. None of them reached the Holy Land and their expedition was ultimately dispersed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thietmar (pilgrim)</span>

Thietmar or Dithmar was a German Christian pilgrim who visited the Holy Land in 1217–1218 and wrote an account of his travels, the Liber peregrinationis.

The siege of Safed was part of the campaign of the Mamlūk sultan Baybars I to reduce the Kingdom of Jerusalem. The castle of Safed belonged to the Knights Templar and put up strong resistance. Direct assault, mining and psychological warfare were all employed to force the garrison to surrender. It was ultimately tricked into surrendering through treachery and the Templars were massacred. Baybars repaired and garrisoned the castle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fall of Outremer</span> History of the Kingdom of Jerusalem from 1272 until 1302.

The fall of Outremer describes the history of the Kingdom of Jerusalem from the end of the last European Crusade to the Holy Land in 1272 until the final loss in 1302. The kingdom was the center of Outremer—the four Crusader states—formed after the First Crusade in 1099 and reached its peak in 1187. The loss of Jerusalem in that year began the century-long decline. The years 1272–1302 are fraught with many conflicts throughout the Levant as well as the Mediterranean and Western European regions, and many Crusades were proposed to free the Holy Land from Mamluk control. The major players fighting the Muslims included the kings of England and France, the kingdoms of Cyprus and Sicily, the three Military Orders and Mongol Ilkhanate. Traditionally, the end of Western European presence in the Holy Land is identified as their defeat at the Siege of Acre in 1291, but the Christian forces managed to hold on to the small island fortress of Ruad until 1302.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Recovery of the Holy Land</span> Genre of literature in mediaeval Europe

The theme of recovery of the Holy Land was a genre in High–Late Medieval Christian literature about the Crusades. It consisted of treatises and memoranda on how to recover the Holy Land for Christendom, first appearing in preparation for the Second Council of Lyon in 1274. They proliferated following the loss of Acre in 1291, shortly after which the permanent Crusader presence in the Holy Land came to an end, but mostly disappeared with the cancellation of Philip VI of France's planned crusade in 1336 and the start of the Hundred Years' War between England and France the next year. The high point of recovery proposals was the pontificate of Clement V.