Islamic criminal law in Aceh

Last updated

Location of Aceh (red) in Indonesia Aceh in Indonesia.svg
Location of Aceh (red) in Indonesia
A convict receiving a caning sentence in Banda Aceh in 2014. Caning is one of the controversial provisions of Islamic criminal law in Aceh. Aceh caning 2014, VOA.jpg
A convict receiving a caning sentence in Banda Aceh in 2014. Caning is one of the controversial provisions of Islamic criminal law in Aceh.

The province of Aceh in Indonesia enforces some provisions of Islamic criminal law, the sole Indonesian province to do so. In Aceh, Islamic criminal law is called jinayat (an Arabic loanword). The laws that implement it are called Qanun Jinayat or Hukum Jinayat, roughly meaning "Islamic criminal code". [1] [lower-alpha 1] Although the largely-secular laws of Indonesia apply in Aceh, the provincial government passed additional regulations, some derived from Islamic criminal law, after Indonesia authorized the province to enact regional regulations and granted Aceh special autonomy to implement Islamic law. Offences under the provisions include alcohol consumption, production and distribution, gambling, adultery, rape, sexual harassment, certain intimacies outside marriage, and certain homosexual acts. Punishments include caning, fines, and imprisonment. There is no provision for stoning; an attempt to introduce it in 2009 was vetoed by Governor Irwandi Yusuf. In 2016 Aceh processed 324 first instance court cases under Islamic criminal law, and carried out at least 100 caning sentences.

Contents

Supporters of Islamic criminal law defend its legality under the special autonomy granted to Aceh. Critics, including Amnesty International, object to the use of caning as a punishment, as well as the criminalization of consensual sex outside marriage.

Background

Special autonomy of Aceh

Soldiers of the now-defunct Free Aceh Movement (date unknown, photo published in 1999). The insurgency in Aceh led to a peace treaty and special autonomy in Aceh. Free Aceh Movement women soldiers.jpg
Soldiers of the now-defunct Free Aceh Movement (date unknown, photo published in 1999). The insurgency in Aceh led to a peace treaty and special autonomy in Aceh.

Aceh is the westernmost province of Indonesia, with a population of 4.49 million according to the 2010 census (roughly 1.8% of Indonesia's total population). [2] It differs from other regions of Indonesia due to its distinct political, religious, and ethnic identity, formed during the time of the indigenous pre-colonial states such as the Aceh Sultanate. [3] Muslims in Aceh are generally more religious than those in other parts of Indonesia, and are proud of their Islamic heritage, earning the province the nickname of "Verandah of Mecca" (Indonesian : serambi Mekkah). [3] [4] More than 98% of Aceh's population identify as Muslim. [5]

As part of the post-Suharto reforms, Indonesia granted more power to local governments. [6] This decentralization of power was largely governed by two laws passed in 1999 and 2004. [6] These laws authorized the local governments and legislatures to pass regional regulations (peraturan daerah or perda) that carry the force of law, as long as they do not conflict with laws or regulations that are higher in the hierarchy of laws. [6] Aceh's regional regulations are known as qanun (from an Arabic word meaning "law" or "rules"). [7]

In addition to this, Aceh was given special autonomy, partly in response to the 1976–2005 insurgency in the province. [8] Indonesian Law No. 18 of 2001 on Special Autonomy in Aceh granted broader powers to the province, including the authority to formally implement Islamic law. [9] Law No. 11 of 2006 on the Administration of Aceh explicitly made implementation of Islamic law the legal duty of the government of Aceh. [4]

Status of Islamic law in Indonesia

At the national level, there are three systems of law in operation in Indonesia: civil law, commercial law, and criminal law. Outside Aceh, the influence of Islamic law is limited to civil law in the areas of marriage, inheritance, and religious endowments (Indonesian : waqaf ), and to commercial law in certain areas of Islamic banking and finance. [10] Other sources of civil and commercial law include European codes and customary tradition (Indonesian : adat ). [11] The criminal code (Indonesian : Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana, KUHP, the "Criminal Law Code") is largely based on the Netherlands Indies Criminal Code imposed by the Netherlands, which ruled Indonesia before 1945, with certain amendments promulgated by the Republic of Indonesia after independence. [11] Aceh is the only province of Indonesia that enforces Islamic law in criminal matters. [1] [12]

Provisions of Islamic law specific to Aceh are promulgated through qanuns, which have the legal status of perda (regional regulation). [7] Their legal basis include Law No. 11 of 2006, which mandated Islamic law in Aceh. [13] A qanun requires approval from both the parliament of Aceh (Indonesian : Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Aceh, DPRA) and the governor to become law. [14] While the largely secular Indonesian national law still applies in Aceh, the qanuns cover offences not defined in the national law, and in some cases define a different punishment. [15] The qanuns are subordinate to the Indonesian constitution and national laws, and are subject to judicial review in the Supreme Court or the Constitutional Court. [13] This means that there must be no qanuns or Islamic sharia law in Aceh that conflicts with or overrides the Indonesian national law. [16] This legal structure also means that not all provisions of Islamic law apply in Aceh, but only the specific elements of it which have been legislated. [17] It also means that legislation is carried out by the elected parliament and governor, not the ulema (Islamic scholars). [14]

Legislative history

Governor Irwandi Yusuf (in office 2007-2012) vetoed a 2009 qanun which would have introduced stoning. Irwandi Yusuf 2007.jpg
Governor Irwandi Yusuf (in office 2007–2012) vetoed a 2009 qanun which would have introduced stoning.

Institution of Islamic criminal law in Aceh began with Qanun No. 11 of 2002, which was largely symbolic. [9] In 2003 further laws were passed: Qanuns No. 12, which dealt with the consumption of alcohol, No. 13, on gambling, and No. 14, on khalwat (being alone with someone of the opposite sex who is not a spouse or a relative). [9] In 2009 the parliament of Aceh approved a new qanun that expanded the implementation of Islamic criminal law, but the governor at the time, Irwandi Yusuf, refused to sign the qanun into law, openly declaring his opposition to the provision of stoning ( rajm ) in the Qanun. [18] The law required approval from both the legislature and the governor, so it did not go into effect. [19] [20] On 27 September 2014 the parliament of Aceh passed Qanun No. 6, which revised the rejected 2009 qanun and removed the provision of stoning. [21] [20] Governor Zaini Abdullah signed it into law on 23 October 2014, and it went into effect one year later on 23 October 2015, as stipulated by the qanun. [21] Compared to the 2003 qanuns that it replaced, Qanun No. 6 increased the number of offences punishable under Islamic law as well as the severity of punishment. [21] [22] [8] Under the 2003 laws, the maximum number of caning strokes was set at 40, and in practice it rarely exceeded 12, but the 2014 law set the minimum number of strokes at 10 and the maximum at 150. [21]

In March 2018, Aceh's sharia and human rights bureau started conducting research and consulting public opinion for the introduction of capital punishment, specifically beheading, as punishment for severe crimes such as murder. [23] Although Indonesia has the death penalty, in 2018, the central government warned that Aceh's plan to usher in beheading as a punishment for murder was banned under existing national laws. [24]

Since April 2018, the governor of Aceh Irwandi Yusuf stated that caning violators of Islamic law should no longer be carried out in public places. Executions are carried out in designated correctional institutions. According to Irwandi, this policy is in accordance with Aceh Governor Regulation Number 5 of 2018 concerning the implementation of the Jinayat Procedure Law which is carried out in governmental institutions, state prisons, or branches of the Aceh regional state prison. Children under the age of 18 are prohibited from watching. [25]

Provisions

Qanun Aceh No. 6 of 2014 (known as the Qanun Jinayat) is the latest revision of Islamic criminal law implementation in Aceh. It criminalizes the consumption and production of liquor (called khamar in the law), gambling ( maisir ), being alone with someone of the opposite sex who is not a spouse or a relative (khalwat), committing intimacy outside marriage (ikhtilath), adultery (zina), sexual abuse (pelecehan seksual), rape (pemerkosaan), falsely accusing someone of adultery (qadzaf), sodomy between males (liwath), and lesbian acts (musahaqah). [26] [1] [27]

The penalty for violation of these laws includes caning, fines, and imprisonment. [26] The severity of the sentence varies. [26] Khalwat offences have the lightest sentence, and may include caning (maximum 10 strokes), 10 months' imprisonment, or a fine of 100 gold grams. [28] [29] The heaviest sentence is imposed on perpetrators of child rape; the sentence may be caning (150–200 strokes), imprisonment (150–200 months), or a fine (1,500–2,000 gold grams). [30] [31] Judges of individual cases have the discretion of imposing caning, imprisonment, or a fine. [31] According to Amnesty International, there were 108 cases of caning carried out under the Qanun in 2015, and 100 in 2016 up to October. [1] [28]

The law is applicable to all offences committed by Muslims or legal entities in Aceh. It also applies to offences committed by non-Muslims if the offences are not regulated in the Indonesian Criminal Code, or if committed together with a Muslim and the non-Muslim voluntarily chooses Islamic law. [26] [32] In April 2016 a Christian woman was caned 28 times for selling alcohol –the first non-Muslim to receive caning under the law. [1]

The Aceh Sharia courts (Mahkamah Syar'iyah Aceh), which hear both civil and criminal cases involving Islamic law Mahkamah Syar'iyyah Aceh.JPG
The Aceh Sharia courts (Mahkamah Syar'iyah Aceh), which hear both civil and criminal cases involving Islamic law

Major institutions relevant to the implementation of Islamic criminal law in Aceh include the ulama council (Indonesian : Majelis Permusyawaratan Ulama, MPU), the Wilayatul Hisbah (WH, sometimes referred to in English as the "Sharia police"), and the sharia courts (Indonesian : Mahkamah Syar'iyah). [33] The ulema council is composed of both the ulama and "Muslim intellectuals", and on paper is expected to be involved in creating policies together with the government in regencies/cities. However, it has not been able to exercise these powers, and in reality legislation is done by the Parliament of Aceh and the governor's office. [34] [14] The Wilayatul Hisbah has the authority to reprimand and give advice to those caught violating the Islamic law. [34] It does not have the authority to formally charge or detain suspects, and thus must work together with the regular police and prosecutors in order to enforce the law. [34] The sharia courts hear and rule on both civil cases under Islamic law (such as divorce and inheritance) and criminal law under the qanuns. [35] However, civil cases continue to be the vast majority of cases heard by the court. [35] In 2016 the courts received 10,888 first instance civil cases and 131 appeals, compared to 324 first instance criminal cases and 15 appeals. [36] The sharia courts are part of the broader Indonesian legal system. [37] Their decisions can be appealed to the Supreme Court, and their judges (including the chief judge) are appointed by the Supreme Court. [38]

Judicial review

A judicial review before the Indonesian Supreme Court was brought against the 2014 Qanun by the Institute for Criminal Justice Reform in 2015. The petitioner argued that the Qanun was not in line with superior laws, namely the national Criminal Code, as the code did not include caning in its exhaustive list of allowed punishments; the 1999 Human Rights Law and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, since caning is considered to be a form of torture or cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment under these instruments; and also the Criminal Procedure Code for the reason that the code requires police to provide evidence for crimes, not the victims, and oath before God is not regarded as a valid form of evidence. Furthermore, the petitioner asserted that the Qanun was contrary to "hierarchy of laws" clause under Article 7(1) of the Law-making Law. It further argued that the Qanun violated Article 6(1)(i) of the 2011 Law-making Law, as the Qanun was deemed to be a duplicate of national laws and thus was compromising legal order and certainty. [39] However, because at the time of the appeal the Indonesian Constitutional Court was reviewing a challenge against the said Article 7(1), the Court dismissed the appeal by invoking Article 55 of the Constitutional Court Law. [40] This decision was criticized by expert of Indonesian law Simon Butt, as the Supreme Court could have proceeded with the case by considering the claim that the Qanun is contrary to other higher-level laws. [41]

Reactions

Amnesty International said that they are "seriously concerned" about the implementation of the law and called for the repeal of some of its provisions. [1] It said that caning can amount to torture and contravenes the Constitution of Indonesia and international human rights law, and can cause long-term physical and mental injuries. [1] Additionally, it objected to the criminalization of consensual sexual relationships outside marriage, on the grounds that they violate the right to privacy. [1] Indonesian women's rights organization Solidaritas Perempuan said that the provisions are biased against women, and that the high standard of proof required for rape convictions means that many rapists are acquitted. [42]

Legal scholar Hamdani of Aceh's Malikussaleh University said that the people of Aceh have the right to enact Islamic law as freedom of religion and defended its legality based on Indonesian laws granting Aceh authority to enact Islamic law. [43] Deputy head of the Aceh Islamic Sharia Agency Munawar Jalil rejected criticism that provisions of the law violated human rights or existing laws in Indonesia and Aceh, and invited critics to file a judicial review if they believe otherwise. [26]

Notes

  1. ↑ Sometimes media sources refer to these laws as the "Sharia" (Islamic law), but the vast majority of instances of the application of Islamic law in Aceh involved civil cases (e.g. divorce and inheritance), with criminal cases forming only a small subset. See Cammack & Feener 2012, p. 42 and Mahkamah Syar'iyah Aceh 2017, pp. 34–36

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sharia</span> Islamic law

Sharia is a body of religious law that forms a part of the Islamic tradition. It is derived from the religious precepts of Islam and is based on scriptures of Islam, particularly the Quran and the Hadith. In Arabic, the term sharīʿah refers to God's immutable divine law and is contrasted with fiqh, which refers to its human scholarly interpretations. Over time, legal schools have emerged, reflecting the preferences of particular societies and governments, as well as islamic scholars or imams through their work on the theoretical (usul) and practical application (füru'/Fatwa) of laws and regulations. However, sharia has never been the sole valid legal system in Islam, and has always been used alongside urf from the beginning. Although sharia is presented as a form of government in addition to its other aspects, especially by the contemporary Islamist understanding, some researchers see the early history of Islam, which was also modelled and exalted by most Muslims; not a period when the understanding of sharia was dominant, but a kind of "secular Arabic expansion".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aceh</span> Province of Indonesia

Aceh, officially the Province of Aceh, is the westernmost province of Indonesia. It is located on the northern end of Sumatra island, with Banda Aceh being its capital and largest city. It is bordered by the Indian Ocean to the west, Strait of Malacca to the northeast, as well bordering the province of North Sumatra to the east, and shares maritime borders with Malaysia and Thailand to the east, Maldives, British Indian Ocean Territory of the United Kingdom, Sri Lanka to the west, Andaman and Nicobar Islands of India and Myanmar to the north. Granted a special autonomous status, Aceh is a religiously conservative territory and the only Indonesian province practicing the Sharia law officially. There are ten indigenous ethnic groups in this region, the largest being the Acehnese people, accounting for approximately 70% of the region's population.

The Hanafi school, Hanafism, or the Hanafi fiqh is the oldest and one of the four traditional major Sunni schools (Fiqh) of Islamic Law (madhhab). It is named after the 8th century Kufan scholar, Abu Hanifa, a Tabi‘i whose legal views were preserved primarily by his two most important disciples, Imam Abu Yusuf and Muhammad al-Shaybani. It is considered one of the most widely accepted maddhab amongst Sunni Muslim community and is called the Madhhab of Jurists. A plurality of Hanafi Muslims follow and have followed the Maturidi school of theology.

A criminal code is a document that compiles all, or a significant amount of, a particular jurisdiction's criminal law. Typically a criminal code will contain offences that are recognised in the jurisdiction, penalties that might be imposed for these offences, and some general provisions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Adat</span> Customary law in Muslim regions

Adat is a generic term derived from Arabic to describe a variety of local customary practices and traditions deemed compatible with Islam as observed by Muslim communities in the Balkans, North Caucasus, Central Asia, and Southeast Asia. Despite its Arabic origin, the term adat resonates deeply throughout Maritime Southeast Asia, where due to colonial influence, its usage has been systematically institutionalised into various non-Muslim communities. Within the region, the term refers, in a broader sense, to the customary norms, rules, interdictions, and injunctions that guide individuals' conduct as members of the community and the sanctions and forms of address by which these norms and rules are upheld. Adat also includes the set of local and traditional laws and dispute resolution systems by which these societies are regulated.

In Islamic Law, tazir refers to punishment for offenses at the discretion of the judge (Qadi) or ruler of the state. It is one of three major types of punishments or sanctions under Sharia Islamic law — hadd, qisas and ta'zir. The punishments for the Hadd offenses are fixed by the Qur'an or Hadith, qisas allow equal retaliation in cases of intentional bodily harm, while ta'zir refers to punishments applied to the other offenses for which no punishment is specified in the Qur'an or the Hadith or is not punishable under either qisas or hudud.

Law of Indonesia is based on a civil law system, intermixed with local customary law and Dutch law. Before the Dutch presence and colonization began in the sixteenth century, indigenous kingdoms ruled the archipelago independently with their own custom laws, known as adat. Foreign influences from India, China and the Middle East have not only affected culture, but also the customary adat laws. The people of Aceh in Sumatra, for instance, observe their own sharia law, while ethnic groups like the Toraja in Sulawesi still follow their animistic customary law.

Islamic criminal law is criminal law in accordance with Sharia. Strictly speaking, Islamic law does not have a distinct corpus of "criminal law". It divides crimes into three different categories depending on the offense – Hudud, Qisas, and Tazir. Some add the fourth category of Siyasah, while others consider it as part of either Hadd or Tazir crimes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Indonesia</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people in Indonesia face legal challenges and prejudices not experienced by non-LGBT residents. Traditional mores disapprove of homosexuality and transitioning, which impacts public policy. Indonesian same-sex couples and households headed by same-sex couples are not eligible for any of the legal protections available to opposite-sex married couples. Most parts of Indonesia do not have a sodomy law, and the country does not currently prohibit non-commercial, private and consensual sexual activity between members of the same-sex, yet there is no specific Indonesian law that protects the LGBT community against discrimination and hate crimes. In Aceh, homosexuality is illegal under Islamic Sharia law and it is punishable by flogging or imprisonment. Indonesia does not recognize same-sex marriage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caning in Malaysia</span> Corporal punishment

Caning is used as a form of corporal punishment in Malaysia. It can be divided into at least four contexts: judicial/prison, school, domestic, and sharia/syariah. Of these, the first is largely a legacy of British colonial rule in the territories that are now part of Malaysia, particularly Malaya.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stoning</span> Method of capital punishment

Stoning, or lapidation, is a method of capital punishment where a group throws stones at a person until the subject dies from blunt trauma. It has been attested as a form of punishment for grave misdeeds since ancient times.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Indonesia</span> Judicial system in Indonesia

The Judiciary of Indonesia constitutionally consists of the Supreme Court of Indonesia, the Constitutional Court of Indonesia, and the lesser court system under the Supreme Court. These lesser courts are categorically subdivided into the public courts, religious courts, state administrative courts, and military courts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judicial corporal punishment</span> Punitive practice

Judicial corporal punishment is the infliction of corporal punishment as a result of a sentence imposed on an offender by a court of law. The punishments include caning, bastinado, birching, whipping, or strapping. The practice was once commonplace in many countries, but over time it has been abolished in most countries, although still remaining a form of legal punishment in some countries including a number of former British colonies and Muslim-majority states.

Sharia means Islamic law based on age-old concepts. Since the early Islamic states of the eighth and ninth centuries, Sharia always existed alongside other normative systems.

Qanun is an Arabic term that refers to laws established by Muslim sovereigns, especially the body of administrative, economic and criminal law promulgated by Ottoman sultans. It is used to contrast with sharia, the body of law elaborated by Muslim jurists. It is thus frequently translated as "dynastic law."

The legal system of the United Arab Emirates is a blend of Islamic Sharia law and French civil law. Some free-trade zones in Dubai have their own independent legal systems and courts and Dubai is considering introducing English common law there.

In Indonesia, a regional regulation is a regulation that is passed by Indonesian local governments and carry the force of law in that region. There are two levels of regional regulations. Provinces pass provincial regulation, while the second tier subdivisions of Indonesia, known as regencies and cities pass regency regulation and city regulation, respectively. Each type of regional regulation is passed by the region's parliamentary body together with their chief executive.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caning in Brunei</span> Corporal punishment

Caning is used as a form of judicial corporal punishment in Brunei. This practice is heavily influenced by Brunei's history as a British protectorate from 1888 to 1984. Similar forms of corporal punishment are also used in two of Brunei's neighbouring countries, Singapore and Malaysia, which are themselves former British colonies.

Hukum Kanun Pahang, also known as Kanun Pahang or Undang-Undang Pahang was the Qanun or legal code of the old Pahang Sultanate. It contains significant provisions that reaffirmed the primacy of Malay adat, while at the same time accommodating and assimilating the Islamic law. The legal code was largely modelled on the Undang-Undang Melaka and Undang-Undang Laut Melaka, and was compiled during the reign of the 12th Sultan of Pahang, Abdul Ghafur Muhiuddin Shah. It is regarded as one of the oldest digest of laws compiled in the Malay world.

Capital punishment for offenses is allowed by law in some countries. Such offenses include adultery, apostasy, blasphemy, corruption, drug trafficking, espionage, fraud, homosexuality and sodomy, perjury, prostitution, sorcery and witchcraft, theft, and treason.

References

Footnotes

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Amnesty International (2016-10-27). "Indonesia: Criminalization of consensual intimacy or sexual activity for unmarried couples in Aceh must end" (PDF).
  2. ↑ Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2010 Archived 2020-10-20 at the Wayback Machine , Badan Pusat Statistik
  3. 1 2 Uddin 2010, p. 615.
  4. 1 2 Ichwan 2011, p. 184.
  5. ↑ "Sensus Penduduk 2010, Penduduk Menurut Wilayah dan Agama yang Dianut, Provinsi Aceh" (in Indonesian). Badan Pusat Statistik.
  6. 1 2 3 Cammack & Feener 2012, p. 36.
  7. 1 2 "Dasar Hukum Pelaksanaan Pemerintahan di Aceh" (in Indonesian). Hukumonline. 2015-11-06.
  8. 1 2 "Indonesia's Aceh province: Laying down God's law". The Economist. 2014-02-15.
  9. 1 2 3 Cammack & Feener 2012, p. 38.
  10. ↑ Cammack & Feener 2012, pp. 28–29.
  11. 1 2 "Legal System" (PDF). ASEAN Law Association. Retrieved 2017-02-13.
  12. ↑ Munawir, Reza (2015-10-23). "Indonesia's Aceh province enacts Islamic criminal code". Reuters.
  13. 1 2 "Keabsahan Ketentuan Pidana dalam Qanun Pemerintah Aceh" (in Indonesian). Hukumonline. 2013-05-06.
  14. 1 2 3 Ichwan 2011, p. 212.
  15. ↑ "Pluralisme Sistem Hukum di Aceh". hukumonline.com/klinik. Retrieved 25 March 2019.
  16. ↑ "Wapres:Syariat Islam di Aceh tidak boleh bertentangan dengan hukum nasional". bbc.com (in Indonesian). 21 August 2015. Retrieved 2023-09-05.
  17. ↑ Ichwan 2011, p. 199.
  18. ↑ Ichwan 2011, p. 211.
  19. ↑ Ichwan 2011, pp. 183–184, 211.
  20. 1 2 "Aceh fully enforces sharia". The Jakarta Post. 2014-02-07.
  21. 1 2 3 4 Warsidi, Adi (2015-10-23). "Qanun Jinayat Kini Berlaku, Hukuman Cambuk Lebih Berat" (in Indonesian). Tempo.
  22. ↑ "Qanun Hukum Jinayah, Kitab Pidana ala Serambi Mekkah" (in Indonesian). Hukumonline. 2015-02-09.
  23. ↑ B, Associated Press in; Aceh, a (2018-03-14). "Indonesian province considers beheading as murder punishment". the Guardian. Retrieved 2018-03-14.
  24. ↑ Sapiie, Marguerite Afra (16 March 2018). "Aceh cannot introduce beheading as punishment, official says". The Jakarta Post. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
  25. ↑ "Eksekusi Hukum Cambuk di Aceh Tidak Lagi di Tempat Umum" (in Indonesian). tempo.co. 2018-04-12.
  26. 1 2 3 4 5 Simajuntak, Hotli (2015-10-13). "'Qanun Jinayat' becomes official for all people in Aceh". The Jakarta Post.
  27. ↑ Qanun Aceh No. 6 of 2014, Arts 1 and 3
  28. 1 2 "Perda Jinayat Aceh terus dikecam" (in Indonesian). BBC Indonesia. 2015-10-23.
  29. ↑ Qanun Aceh No. 6 of 2014, Art 23
  30. ↑ Qanun Aceh No. 6 of 2014, Art 50
  31. 1 2 Warsidi, Adi (2015-10-27). "Qanun Jinayat: Hukuman Pemerkosa Anak, Cambuk 200 Kali". Tempo (in Indonesian).
  32. ↑ Qanun Aceh No. 6 of 2014, Art 5
  33. ↑ Cammack & Feener 2012, p. 39.
  34. 1 2 3 Cammack & Feener 2012, p. 40.
  35. 1 2 Cammack & Feener 2012, p. 42.
  36. ↑ Mahkamah Syar'iyah Aceh 2017, pp. 34–36.
  37. ↑ Cammack & Feener 2012, p. 41.
  38. ↑ Cammack & Feener 2012, pp. 41–42.
  39. ↑ Butt 2019, pp. 15.
  40. ↑ Butt 2019, pp. 15–16.
  41. ↑ Butt 2019, pp. 17.
  42. ↑ "Setahun Diberlakukan, Qanun Jinayat Aceh Diminta Dikaji Ulang" (in Indonesian). Kompas. 2016-10-23.
  43. ↑ Hamdani 2013, p. 89.

Bibliography

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.