Luminescence dating

Last updated

Luminescence dating refers to a group of chronological dating methods of determining how long ago mineral grains were last exposed to sunlight or sufficient heating. It is useful to geologists and archaeologists who want to know when such an event occurred. It uses various methods to stimulate and measure luminescence.

Contents

It includes techniques such as optically stimulated luminescence (OSL), infrared stimulated luminescence (IRSL), and thermoluminescence dating (TL). "Optical dating" typically refers to OSL and IRSL, but not TL. The age range of luminescence dating methods extends from a few years [1] to over one million years. [2]

Conditions and accuracy

All sediments and soils contain trace amounts of radioactive isotopes of elements such as potassium, uranium, thorium, and rubidium. These slowly decay over time and the ionizing radiation they produce is absorbed by mineral grains in the sediments such as quartz and potassium feldspar. The radiation causes charge to remain within the grains in structurally unstable "electron traps". The trapped charge accumulates over time at a rate determined by the amount of background radiation at the location where the sample was buried. Stimulating these mineral grains using either light (blue or green for OSL; infrared for IRSL) or heat (for TL) causes a luminescence signal to be emitted as the stored unstable electron energy is released, the intensity of which varies depending on the amount of radiation absorbed during burial and specific properties of the mineral.

Most luminescence dating methods rely on the assumption that the mineral grains were sufficiently "bleached" at the time of the event being dated. For example, in quartz a short daylight exposure in the range of 1–100 seconds before burial is sufficient to effectively “reset” the OSL dating clock. [3] This is usually, but not always, the case with aeolian deposits, such as sand dunes and loess, and some water-laid deposits. Single Quartz OSL ages can be determined typically from 100 to 350,000 years BP, and can be reliable when suitable methods are used and proper checks are done. [4] Feldspar IRSL techniques have the potential to extend the datable range out to a million years as feldspars typically have significantly higher dose saturation levels than quartz, though issues regarding anomalous fading will need to be dealt with first. [3] Ages can be obtained outside these ranges, but they should be regarded with caution. The uncertainty of an OSL date is typically 5-10% of the age of the sample. [5]

There are two different methods of OSL dating: multiple-aliquot-dose and single-aliquot-regenerative-dose (SAR). In multiple-aliquot testing, a number of grains of sand are stimulated at the same time and the resulting luminescence signature is averaged. [6] The problem with this technique is that the operator does not know the individual figures that are being averaged, and so if there are partially prebleached grains in the sample it can give an exaggerated age. [6] In contrast to the multiple-aliquot method, the SAR method tests the burial ages of individual grains of sand which are then plotted. Mixed deposits can be identified and taken into consideration when determining the age. [6]

History

The concept of using luminescence dating in archaeological contexts was first suggested in 1953 by Farrington Daniels, Charles A. Boyd, and Donald F. Saunders, who thought the thermoluminescence response of pottery shards could date the last incidence of heating. [7] Experimental tests on archaeological ceramics followed a few years later in 1960 by Grögler et al. [8] Over the next few decades, thermoluminescence research was focused on heated pottery and ceramics, burnt flints, baked hearth sediments, oven stones from burnt mounds and other heated objects. [5]

In 1963, Aitken et al. noted that TL traps in calcite could be bleached by sunlight as well as heat, [9] and in 1965 Shelkoplyas and Morozov were the first to use TL to date unheated sediments. [10] Throughout the 70s and early 80s TL dating of light-sensitive traps in geological sediments of both terrestrial and marine origin became more widespread. [11]

Optical dating using optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) was developed in 1984 by David J. Huntley and colleagues. [12] Hütt et al. laid the groundwork for the infrared stimulated luminescence (IRSL) dating of potassium feldspars in 1988. [13] The traditional OSL method relies on optical stimulation and transfer of electrons from one trap, to holes located elsewhere in the lattice – necessarily requiring two defects to be in nearby proximity, and hence it is a destructive technique. The problem is that nearby electron/hole trapping centres suffer from localized tunneling, eradicating their signal over time; it is this issue that currently defines the upper age-limit for OSL dating

In 1994, the principles behind optical and thermoluminescence dating were extended to include surfaces made of granite, basalt and sandstone, such as carved rock from ancient monuments and artifacts. Ioannis Liritzis, the initiator of ancient buildings luminescence dating, has shown this in several cases of various monuments. [14] [15] [16]

Physics

Luminescence dating is one of several techniques in which an age is calculated as follows:

age = (total absorbed radiation dose) / (radiation dose rate) [14]

The radiation dose rate is calculated from measurements of the radioactive elements (K, U, Th and Rb) within the sample and its surroundings and the radiation dose rate from cosmic rays. The dose rate is usually in the range 0.5 - 5 grays/1000 years. The total absorbed radiation dose is determined by exciting, with light, specific minerals (usually quartz or potassium feldspar) extracted from the sample, and measuring the amount of light emitted as a result. The photons of the emitted light must have higher energies than the excitation photons in order to avoid measurement of ordinary photoluminescence. A sample in which the mineral grains have all been exposed to sufficient daylight (seconds for quartz; hundreds of seconds for potassium feldspar) can be said to be of zero age; when excited it will not emit any such photons. The older the sample is, the more light it emits, up to a saturation limit.

Minerals

The minerals that are measured are usually either quartz or potassium feldspar sand-sized grains, or unseparated silt-sized grains. There are advantages and disadvantages to using each. For quartz, blue or green excitation frequencies are normally used and the near ultra-violet emission is measured. For potassium feldspar or silt-sized grains, near infrared excitation (IRSL) is normally used and violet emissions are measured.

Comparison to radiocarbon dating

Unlike carbon-14 dating, luminescence dating methods do not require a contemporary organic component of the sediment to be dated; just quartz, potassium feldspar, or certain other mineral grains that have been fully bleached during the event being dated. These methods also do not suffer from overestimation of dates when the sediment in question has been mixed with “old carbon”, or 14
C
-deficient carbon that is not the same isotopic ratio as the atmosphere. In a study of the chronology of arid-zone lacustrine sediments from Lake Ulaan in southern Mongolia, Lee et al. discovered that OSL and radiocarbon dates agreed in some samples, but the radiocarbon dates were up to 5800 years older in others. [17]

The sediments with disagreeing ages were determined to be deposited by aeolian processes. Westerly winds delivered an influx of 14
C
-deficient carbon from adjacent soils and Paleozoic carbonate rocks, a process that is also active today. This reworked carbon changed the measured isotopic ratios, giving a false older age. However, the wind-blown origin of these sediments were ideal for OSL dating, as most of the grains would have been completely bleached by sunlight exposure during transport and burial. Lee et al. concluded that when aeolian sediment transport is suspected, especially in lakes of arid environments, the OSL dating method is superior to the radiocarbon dating method, as it eliminates a common ‘old-carbon’ error problem. [17]

Other uses

One of the benefits of luminescence dating is that it can be used to confirm the authenticity of an artifact. Under proper low light conditions a sample in the tens of milligrams can be used. [18]

See also

Notes

  1. Montret et al., 1992
  2. Fattahi M., Stokes S., 2001
  3. 1 2 Rhodes, E. J. (2011). "Optically stimulated luminescence dating of sediments over the past 250,000 years". Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences. 39: 461–488. Bibcode:2011AREPS..39..461R. doi:10.1146/annurev-earth-040610-133425.
  4. Murray, A. S. & Olley, J. M. (2002). "Precision and accuracy in the optically stimulated luminescence dating of sedimentary quartz: a status review" (PDF). Geochronometria. 21: 1–16. Retrieved February 8, 2016.
  5. 1 2 Roberts, R.G., Jacobs, Z., Li, B., Jankowski, N.R., Cunningham, A.C., & Rosenfeld, A.B. (2015). "Optical dating in archaeology: thirty years in retrospect and grand challenges for the future". Journal of Archaeological Science. 56: 41–60. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2015.02.028.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  6. 1 2 3 Jacobs, Z and Roberts, R (2007). "Advances in Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dating of Individual Grains of Quartz from Archaeological Deposits". Evolutionary Anthropology. 16 (6): 218. doi:10.1002/evan.20150. S2CID   84231863.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  7. Daniels, F., Boyd, C.A., & Saunders, D.F. (1953). "Thermoluminescence as a research tool". Science. 117 (3040): 343–349. Bibcode:1953Sci...117..343D. doi:10.1126/science.117.3040.343. PMID   17756578.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  8. Grögler, N., Houtermans, F.G., & Stauffer, H. (1960). "Über die datierung von keramik und ziegel durch thermolumineszenz". Helvetica Physica Acta. 33: 595–596. Retrieved February 16, 2016.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  9. Aitken, M.J., Tite, M.S. & Reid, J. (1963). "Thermoluminescent dating: progress report". Archaeometry. 6: 65–75. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.1963.tb00581.x.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  10. Shelkoplyas, V.N. & Morozov, G.V. (1965). "Some results of an investigation of Quaternary deposits by the thermoluminescence method". Materials on the Quaternary Period of the Ukraine. 7th International Quaternary Association Congress, Kiev: 83–90.
  11. Wintle, A.G. & Huntley, D.J. (1982). "Thermoluminescence dating of sediments". Quaternary Science Reviews. 1 (1): 31–53. Bibcode:1982QSRv....1...31W. doi:10.1016/0277-3791(82)90018-X.
  12. Huntley, D. J., Godfrey-Smith, D. I., & Thewalt, M. L. W. (1985). "Optical dating of sediments". Nature. 313 (5998): 105–107. Bibcode:1985Natur.313..105H. doi:10.1038/313105a0. S2CID   4258671.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  13. Hütt, G., Jaek, I. & Tchonka, J. (1988). "Optical dating: K-feldspars optical response stimulation spectra". Quaternary Science Reviews. 7 (3–4): 381–385. Bibcode:1988QSRv....7..381H. doi:10.1016/0277-3791(88)90033-9.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  14. 1 2 Liritzis, I. (2011). "Surface Dating by Luminescence: An Overview". Geochronometria. 38 (3): 292–302. doi: 10.2478/s13386-011-0032-7 .
  15. Liritzis, I., Polymeris, S.G., and Zacharias, N. (2010). "Surface Luminescence Dating of 'Dragon Houses' and Armena Gate at Styra (Euboea, Greece)". Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry. 10 (3): 65–81. Bibcode:2010MAA....10...65L.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  16. Liritzis, I. (2010). "Strofilas (Andros Island, Greece): new evidence for the cycladic final neolithic period through novel dating methods using luminescence and obsidian hydration". Journal of Archaeological Science. 37 (6): 1367–1377. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2009.12.041.
  17. 1 2 Lee, M.K., Lee, Y.I., Lim, H.S., Lee, J.I., Choi, J.H., & Yoon, H.I. (2011). "Comparison of radiocarbon and OSL dating methods for a Late Quaternary sediment core from Lake Ulaan, Mongolia". Journal of Paleolimnology. 45 (2): 127–135. Bibcode:2011JPall..45..127L. doi:10.1007/s10933-010-9484-7. S2CID   128511753.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  18. Liritzis, Ioannis; Singhvi, Ashok Kumar; Feathers, James K.; Wagner, Gunther A.; Kadereit, Annette; Zacharias, Nikolaos; Li, Sheng-Hua (2013), Liritzis, Ioannis; Singhvi, Ashok Kumar; Feathers, James K.; Wagner, Gunther A. (eds.), "Luminescence-Based Authenticity Testing", Luminescence Dating in Archaeology, Anthropology, and Geoarchaeology: An Overview, SpringerBriefs in Earth System Sciences, Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing, pp. 41–43, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00170-8_5, ISBN   978-3-319-00170-8

Related Research Articles

Radiometric dating, radioactive dating or radioisotope dating is a technique which is used to date materials such as rocks or carbon, in which trace radioactive impurities were selectively incorporated when they were formed. The method compares the abundance of a naturally occurring radioactive isotope within the material to the abundance of its decay products, which form at a known constant rate of decay. The use of radiometric dating was first published in 1907 by Bertram Boltwood and is now the principal source of information about the absolute age of rocks and other geological features, including the age of fossilized life forms or the age of Earth itself, and can also be used to date a wide range of natural and man-made materials.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Geochronology</span> Science of determining the age of rocks, sediments and fossils

Geochronology is the science of determining the age of rocks, fossils, and sediments using signatures inherent in the rocks themselves. Absolute geochronology can be accomplished through radioactive isotopes, whereas relative geochronology is provided by tools such as paleomagnetism and stable isotope ratios. By combining multiple geochronological indicators the precision of the recovered age can be improved.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thermoluminescence dating</span>

Thermoluminescence dating (TL) is the determination, by means of measuring the accumulated radiation dose, of the time elapsed since material containing crystalline minerals was either heated or exposed to sunlight (sediments). As a crystalline material is heated during measurements, the process of thermoluminescence starts. Thermoluminescence emits a weak light signal that is proportional to the radiation dose absorbed by the material. It is a type of luminescence dating.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Loess</span> Sediment of accumulated wind-blown dust

A loess is a clastic, predominantly silt-sized sediment that is formed by the accumulation of wind-blown dust. Ten percent of Earth's land area is covered by loesses or similar deposits.

In physics, optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) is a method for measuring doses from ionizing radiation. It is used in at least two applications:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thermoluminescence</span> Emission of light from certain crystalline materials

Thermoluminescence is a form of luminescence that is exhibited by certain crystalline materials, such as some minerals, when previously absorbed energy from electromagnetic radiation or other ionizing radiation is re-emitted as light upon heating of the material. The phenomenon is distinct from that of black-body radiation.

Archaeological science, also known as archaeometry, consists of the application of scientific techniques to the analysis of archaeological materials and sites. It is related to methodologies of archaeology. Martinón-Torres and Killick distinguish ‘scientific archaeology’ from ‘archaeological science’. Martinón-Torres and Killick claim that ‘archaeological science’ has promoted the development of high-level theory in archaeology. However, Smith rejects both concepts of archaeological science because neither emphasize falsification or a search for causality.

OSL may refer to:

Absolute dating is the process of determining an age on a specified chronology in archaeology and geology. Some scientists prefer the terms chronometric or calendar dating, as use of the word "absolute" implies an unwarranted certainty of accuracy. Absolute dating provides a numerical age or range, in contrast with relative dating, which places events in order without any measure of the age between events.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Greek pyramids</span>

Greek pyramids, also known as the Pyramids of Argolis, refers to several ancient structures located in the plains of Argolid, Greece. The best known of these is known as the Pyramid of Hellinikon. In the time of the geographer Pausanias it was considered to be a tomb. Twentieth century researchers have suggested other possible uses.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Galbraith plot</span> Statistical device

In statistics, a Galbraith plot is one way of displaying several estimates of the same quantity that have different standard errors.

Ioannis Liritzis is professor of physics in archaeology (archaeometry) and his field of specialization is the application of natural sciences to archaeology and cultural heritage. He studied physics at the University of Patras and continued at the University of Edinburgh, where he obtained his Ph.D. in 1980. Since then, he undertook postgraduate work at the University of Oxford, Université Bordeaux III, University of Edinburgh and the Academy of Athens.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thermoluminescent dosimeter</span> Type of radiation dosimeter

A thermoluminescent dosimeter, or TLD, is a type of radiation dosimeter, consisting of a piece of a thermoluminescent crystalline material inside a radiolucent package.

Martin Jim Aitken FRS was a British archaeometrist.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Toca da Tira Peia</span> Rock shelter archaeological site in Brazil

Toca da Tira Peia is a rock shelter site, located in the municipality Coronel José Dias, Piauí state, near the Serra da Capivara National Park, Brazil, thought to hold evidence of prehistoric human presence in South America dating to 22,000 years ago.

Electron spin resonance dating, or ESR dating, is a technique used to date materials which radiocarbon dating cannot, including minerals, biological materials, archaeological materials and food. Electron spin resonance dating was first introduced to the science community in 1975, when Japanese nuclear physicist Motoji Ikeya dated a speleothem in Akiyoshi Cave, Japan. ESR dating measures the amount of unpaired electrons in crystalline structures that were previously exposed to natural radiation. The age of a substance can be determined by measuring the dosage of radiation since the time of its formation.

Chronological dating, or simply dating, is the process of attributing to an object or event a date in the past, allowing such object or event to be located in a previously established chronology. This usually requires what is commonly known as a "dating method". Several dating methods exist, depending on different criteria and techniques, and some very well known examples of disciplines using such techniques are, for example, history, archaeology, geology, paleontology, astronomy and even forensic science, since in the latter it is sometimes necessary to investigate the moment in the past during which the death of a cadaver occurred. These methods are typically identified as absolute, which involves a specified date or date range, or relative, which refers to dating which places artifacts or events on a timeline relative to other events and/or artifacts. Other markers can help place an artifact or event in a chronology, such as nearby writings and stratigraphic markers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Optically stimulated luminescence thermochronometry</span>

Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) thermochronometry is a dating method used to determine the time since quartz and/or feldspar began to store charge as it cools through the effective closure temperature. The closure temperature for quartz and Na-rich K-feldspar is 30-35 °C and 25 °C respectively. When quartz and feldspar are beneath the earth, they are hot. They cool when any geological process e.g. focused erosion causes their exhumation to the earth surface. As they cool, they trap electron charges originating from within the crystal lattice. These charges are accommodated within crystallographic defects or vacancies in their crystal lattices as the mineral cools below the closure temperature.

The Riadino-5 Site is an archaeological site located on a terrace within the Šešupė River Valley in the Kaliningrad Oblast of the Russian Federation. Unlike most other sites near this area, the Riadino-5 site is one of the first sites of the Middle to Upper Paleolithic transitional period to have been found in the Baltic region, which includes Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, and areas of the Russian Federation. Even when compared to other sites of similar age, the Riadino-5 site is still one of the northernmost sites to have been occupied in the Central European region. This makes it one of the oldest sites documenting human habitation, dating back all the way to the Marine Isotope Stage 3, approximately ca 57-26 thousand calendar years ago. The site itself was occupied during the Middle to Upper Paleolithic period within that era between 50 and 44 ka. Upon discovery, the site measured 200 meters by 80 meters. The approximate aging of the site was supported by findings of flint artifacts, using luminescence IRSL dating based on potassium-feldspar sample size and Carbon-14 dating of charcoal and ash layers from the site. At the moment, the exact culture and society of the site occupants has yet to be determined, and is currently undergoing comparative analysis to other similarly dated sites in the vicinity to uncover some answers.

Ashok Kumar Singhvi is an Indian geoscientist and former Dean of Physical Research Laboratory. His field of expertise is Geophysics, Quaternary Sciences and Quantitative Geomorphology.

References