String theory landscape

Last updated

In string theory, the string theory landscape (or landscape of vacua) is the collection of possible false vacua, [1] together comprising a collective "landscape" of choices of parameters governing compactifications.

Contents

The term "landscape" comes from the notion of a fitness landscape in evolutionary biology. [2] It was first applied to cosmology by Lee Smolin in his book The Life of the Cosmos (1997), and was first used in the context of string theory by Leonard Susskind. [3]

Compactified Calabi–Yau manifolds

In string theory the number of flux vacua is commonly thought to be roughly , [4] but could be [5] or higher. The large number of possibilities arises from choices of Calabi–Yau manifolds and choices of generalized magnetic fluxes over various homology cycles, found in F-theory.

If there is no structure in the space of vacua, the problem of finding one with a sufficiently small cosmological constant is NP complete. [6] This is a version of the subset sum problem.

A possible mechanism of string theory vacuum stabilization, now known as the KKLT mechanism, was proposed in 2003 by Shamit Kachru, Renata Kallosh, Andrei Linde, and Sandip Trivedi. [7]

Fine-tuning by the anthropic principle

Fine-tuning of constants like the cosmological constant or the Higgs boson mass are usually assumed to occur for precise physical reasons as opposed to taking their particular values at random. That is, these values should be uniquely consistent with underlying physical laws.

The number of theoretically allowed configurations has prompted suggestions[ according to whom? ] that this is not the case, and that many different vacua are physically realized. [8] The anthropic principle proposes that fundamental constants may have the values they have because such values are necessary for life (and therefore intelligent observers to measure the constants). The anthropic landscape thus refers to the collection of those portions of the landscape that are suitable for supporting intelligent life.

In order to implement this idea in a concrete physical theory, it is necessary[ why? ] to postulate a multiverse in which fundamental physical parameters can take different values. This has been realized in the context of eternal inflation.

Weinberg model

In 1987, Steven Weinberg proposed that the observed value of the cosmological constant was so small because it is impossible for life to occur in a universe with a much larger cosmological constant. [9]

Weinberg attempted to predict the magnitude of the cosmological constant based on probabilistic arguments. Other attempts[ which? ] have been made to apply similar reasoning to models of particle physics. [10]

Such attempts are based in the general ideas of Bayesian probability; interpreting probability in a context where it is only possible to draw one sample from a distribution is problematic in frequentist probability but not in Bayesian probability, which is not defined in terms of the frequency of repeated events.

In such a framework, the probability of observing some fundamental parameters is given by,

where is the prior probability, from fundamental theory, of the parameters and is the "anthropic selection function", determined by the number of "observers" that would occur in the universe with parameters .[ citation needed ]

These probabilistic arguments are the most controversial aspect of the landscape. Technical criticisms of these proposals have pointed out that:[ citation needed ][ year needed ]

Simplified approaches

Tegmark et al. have recently considered these objections and proposed a simplified anthropic scenario for axion dark matter in which they argue that the first two of these problems do not apply. [11]

Vilenkin and collaborators have proposed a consistent way to define the probabilities for a given vacuum. [12]

A problem with many of the simplified approaches people[ who? ] have tried is that they "predict" a cosmological constant that is too large by a factor of 10–1000 orders of magnitude (depending on one's assumptions) and hence suggest that the cosmic acceleration should be much more rapid than is observed. [13] [14] [15]

Interpretation

Few dispute the large number of metastable vacua.[ citation needed ] The existence, meaning, and scientific relevance of the anthropic landscape, however, remain controversial.[ further explanation needed ]

Cosmological constant problem

Andrei Linde, Sir Martin Rees and Leonard Susskind advocate it as a solution to the cosmological constant problem.[ citation needed ]

Weak scale supersymmetry from the landscape

The string landscape ideas can be applied to the notion of weak scale supersymmetry and the Little Hierarchy problem. For string vacua which include the MSSM (Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model) as the low energy effective field theory, all values of SUSY breaking fields are expected to be equally likely on the landscape. This led Douglas [16] and others to propose that the SUSY breaking scale is distributed as a power law in the landscape where is the number of F-breaking fields (distributed as complex numbers) and is the number of D-breaking fields (distributed as real numbers). Next, one may impose the Agrawal, Barr, Donoghue, Seckel (ABDS) anthropic requirement [17] that the derived weak scale lie within a factor of a few of our measured value (lest nuclei as needed for life as we know it become unstable (the atomic principle)). Combining these effects with a mild power-law draw to large soft SUSY breaking terms, one may calculate the Higgs boson and superparticle masses expected from the landscape. [18] The Higgs mass probability distribution peaks around 125 GeV while sparticles (with the exception of light higgsinos) tend to lie well beyond current LHC search limits. This approach is an example of the application of stringy naturalness.

Scientific relevance

David Gross suggests[ citation needed ] that the idea is inherently unscientific, unfalsifiable or premature. A famous debate on the anthropic landscape of string theory is the Smolin–Susskind debate on the merits of the landscape.

There are several popular books about the anthropic principle in cosmology. [19] The authors of two physics blogs, Lubos Motl and Peter Woit, are opposed to this use of the anthropic principle.[ why? ] [20]

See also

Related Research Articles

The anthropic principle, also known as the "observation selection effect", is the hypothesis, first proposed in 1957 by Robert Dicke, that the range of possible observations that we could make about the universe is limited by the fact that observations could only happen in a universe capable of developing intelligent life in the first place. Proponents of the anthropic principle argue that it explains why this universe has the age and the fundamental physical constants necessary to accommodate conscious life, since if either had been different, we would not have been around to make observations. Anthropic reasoning is often used to deal with the notion that the universe seems to be finely tuned for the existence of life.

In physical cosmology, cosmic inflation, cosmological inflation, or just inflation, is a theory of exponential expansion of space in the early universe. The inflationary epoch is believed to have lasted from 10−36 seconds to between 10−33 and 10−32 seconds after the Big Bang. Following the inflationary period, the universe continued to expand, but at a slower rate. The acceleration of this expansion due to dark energy began after the universe was already over 7.7 billion years old.

The multiverse is a hypothetical group of multiple universes. Together, these universes are presumed to comprise everything that exists: the entirety of space, time, matter, energy, information, and the physical laws and constants that describe them. The different universes within the multiverse are called "parallel universes", "other universes", "alternate universes", or "many worlds". One common assumption is that the multiverse is a "patchwork quilt of separate universes all bound by the same laws of physics."

In physics, string theory is a theoretical framework in which the point-like particles of particle physics are replaced by one-dimensional objects called strings. String theory describes how these strings propagate through space and interact with each other. On distance scales larger than the string scale, a string looks just like an ordinary particle, with its mass, charge, and other properties determined by the vibrational state of the string. In string theory, one of the many vibrational states of the string corresponds to the graviton, a quantum mechanical particle that carries the gravitational force. Thus, string theory is a theory of quantum gravity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cosmological constant</span> Constant representing stress–energy density of the vacuum

In cosmology, the cosmological constant, alternatively called Einstein's cosmological constant, is the constant coefficient of a term that Albert Einstein temporarily added to his field equations of general relativity. He later removed it. Much later it was revived and reinterpreted as the energy density of space, or vacuum energy, that arises in quantum mechanics. It is closely associated with the concept of dark energy.

In physical cosmology, baryogenesis is the physical process that is hypothesized to have taken place during the early universe to produce baryonic asymmetry, i.e. the imbalance of matter (baryons) and antimatter (antibaryons) in the observed universe.

Brane cosmology refers to several theories in particle physics and cosmology related to string theory, superstring theory and M-theory.

In theoretical physics, the anti-de Sitter/conformal field theory correspondence, sometimes called Maldacena duality or gauge/gravity duality, is a conjectured relationship between two kinds of physical theories. On one side are anti-de Sitter spaces (AdS) which are used in theories of quantum gravity, formulated in terms of string theory or M-theory. On the other side of the correspondence are conformal field theories (CFT) which are quantum field theories, including theories similar to the Yang–Mills theories that describe elementary particles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Leonard Susskind</span> American physicist

Leonard Susskind is an American physicist, who is a professor of theoretical physics at Stanford University, and founding director of the Stanford Institute for Theoretical Physics. His research interests include string theory, quantum field theory, quantum statistical mechanics and quantum cosmology. He is a member of the US National Academy of Sciences, and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, an associate member of the faculty of Canada's Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, and a distinguished professor of the Korea Institute for Advanced Study.

In theoretical physics, F-theory is a branch of string theory developed by Iranian physicist Cumrun Vafa. The new vacua described by F-theory were discovered by Vafa and allowed string theorists to construct new realistic vacua — in the form of F-theory compactified on elliptically fibered Calabi–Yau four-folds. The letter "F" supposedly stands for "Father".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hierarchy problem</span> Unsolved problem in physics

In theoretical physics, the hierarchy problem is the problem concerning the large discrepancy between aspects of the weak force and gravity. There is no scientific consensus on why, for example, the weak force is 1024 times stronger than gravity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Andrei Linde</span> Russian-American theoretical physicist

Andrei Dmitriyevich Linde is a Russian-American theoretical physicist and the Harald Trap Friis Professor of Physics at Stanford University.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Black hole information paradox</span> Mystery of disappearance of information in a black hole

The black hole information paradox is a puzzle that appears when the predictions of quantum mechanics and general relativity are combined. The theory of general relativity predicts the existence of black holes that are regions of spacetime from which nothing — not even light — can escape. In the 1970s, Stephen Hawking applied the rules of quantum mechanics to such systems and found that an isolated black hole would emit a form of radiation called Hawking radiation. Hawking also argued that the detailed form of the radiation would be independent of the initial state of the black hole and would depend only on its mass, electric charge and angular momentum. The information paradox appears when one considers a process in which a black hole is formed through a physical process and then evaporates away entirely through Hawking radiation. Hawking's calculation suggests that the final state of radiation would retain information only about the total mass, electric charge and angular momentum of the initial state. Since many different states can have the same mass, charge and angular momentum this suggests that many initial physical states could evolve into the same final state. Therefore, information about the details of the initial state would be permanently lost. However, this violates a core precept of both classical and quantum physics—that, in principle, the state of a system at one point in time should determine its value at any other time. Specifically, in quantum mechanics the state of the system is encoded by its wave function. The evolution of the wave function is determined by a unitary operator, and unitarity implies that the wave function at any instant of time can be used to determine the wave function either in the past or the future.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Compactification (physics)</span> Technique in theoretical physics

In theoretical physics, compactification means changing a theory with respect to one of its space-time dimensions. Instead of having a theory with this dimension being infinite, one changes the theory so that this dimension has a finite length, and may also be periodic.

Montonen–Olive duality or electric–magnetic duality is the oldest known example of strong–weak duality or S-duality according to current terminology. It generalizes the electro-magnetic symmetry of Maxwell's equations by stating that magnetic monopoles, which are usually viewed as emergent quasiparticles that are "composite", can in fact be viewed as "elementary" quantized particles with electrons playing the reverse role of "composite" topological solitons; the viewpoints are equivalent and the situation dependent on the duality. It was later proven to hold true when dealing with a N = 4 supersymmetric Yang–Mills theory. It is named after Finnish physicist Claus Montonen and British physicist David Olive after they proposed the idea in their academic paper Magnetic monopoles as gauge particles? where they state:

There should be two "dual equivalent" field formulations of the same theory in which electric (Noether) and magnetic (topological) quantum numbers exchange roles.

Cosmological natural selection, also called the fecund universes, is a hypothesis proposed by Lee Smolin intended as a scientific alternative to the anthropic principle. It addresses the problem of complexity in our universe, which is largely unexplained. The hypothesis suggests that a process analogous to biological natural selection applies at the grandest of scales. Smolin published the idea in 1992 and summarized it in a book aimed at a lay audience called The Life of the Cosmos.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Boltzmann brain</span> Philosophical thought experiment

The Boltzmann brain thought experiment suggests that it might be more likely for a single brain to spontaneously form in a void rather than for the entire universe to come about in the manner cosmologists think it actually did. Physicists use the Boltzmann brain thought experiment as a reductio ad absurdum argument for evaluating competing scientific theories.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Renata Kallosh</span> Theoretical physicist

Renata Elizaveta Kallosh is Ukrainian-American a theoretical physicist. She is a Professor of Physics at Stanford University, working there on supergravity, string theory and inflationary cosmology.

A causal patch is a region of spacetime connected within the relativistic framework of causality.

Raphael Bousso is a theoretical physicist and cosmologist. He is a professor at the Berkeley Center for Theoretical Physics in the Department of Physics, UC Berkeley. He is known for the Bousso bound on the information content of the universe. With Joseph Polchinski, Bousso proposed the string theory landscape as a solution to the cosmological constant problem.

References

  1. The number of metastable vacua is not known exactly, but commonly quoted estimates are of the order 10500. See M. Douglas, "The statistics of string / M theory vacua", JHEP0305, 46 (2003). arXiv : hep-th/0303194; S. Ashok and M. Douglas, "Counting flux vacua", JHEP0401, 060 (2004).
  2. Baggott, Jim (2018). Quantum Space Loop Quantum Gravity and the Search for the Structure of Space, Time, and the Universe. Oxford University Press. p. 288. ISBN   978-0-19-253681-5.
  3. L. Smolin, "Did the universe evolve?", Classical and Quantum Gravity9, 173–191 (1992). L. Smolin, The Life of the Cosmos (Oxford, 1997)
  4. Read, James; Le Bihan, Baptiste (2021). "The landscape and the multiverse: What's the problem?". Synthese. 199 (3–4): 7749–7771. doi: 10.1007/s11229-021-03137-0 . S2CID   234815857.
  5. Taylor, Washington; Wang, Yi-Nan (2015). "The F-theory geometry with most flux vacua". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2015 (12): 164. arXiv: 1511.03209 . Bibcode:2015JHEP...12..164T. doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2015)164. S2CID   41149049.
  6. Frederik Denef; Douglas, Michael R. (2007). "Computational complexity of the landscape". Annals of Physics. 322 (5): 1096–1142. arXiv: hep-th/0602072 . Bibcode:2007AnPhy.322.1096D. doi:10.1016/j.aop.2006.07.013. S2CID   281586.
  7. Kachru, Shamit; Kallosh, Renata; Linde, Andrei; Trivedi, Sandip P. (2003). "de Sitter Vacua in String Theory". Physical Review D. 68 (4): 046005. arXiv: hep-th/0301240 . Bibcode:2003PhRvD..68d6005K. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.68.046005. S2CID   119482182.
  8. L. Susskind, "The anthropic landscape of string theory", arXiv : hep-th/0302219.
  9. S. Weinberg, "Anthropic bound on the cosmological constant", Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 2607 (1987).
  10. S. M. Carroll, "Is our universe natural?" (2005) arXiv : hep-th/0512148 reviews a number of proposals in preprints dated 2004/5.
  11. M. Tegmark, A. Aguirre, M. Rees and F. Wilczek, "Dimensionless constants, cosmology and other dark matters", arXiv : astro-ph/0511774. F. Wilczek, "Enlightenment, knowledge, ignorance, temptation", arXiv : hep-ph/0512187. See also the discussion at .
  12. See, e.g.Alexander Vilenkin (2007). "A measure of the multiverse". Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical. 40 (25): 6777–6785. arXiv: hep-th/0609193 . Bibcode:2007JPhA...40.6777V. doi:10.1088/1751-8113/40/25/S22. S2CID   119390736.
  13. Abraham Loeb (2006). "An observational test for the anthropic origin of the cosmological constant". Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 0605 (5): 009. arXiv: astro-ph/0604242 . Bibcode:2006JCAP...05..009L. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2006/05/009. S2CID   39340203.
  14. Jaume Garriga & Alexander Vilenkin (2006). "Anthropic prediction for Lambda and the Q catastrophe". Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 163: 245–57. arXiv: hep-th/0508005 . Bibcode:2006PThPS.163..245G. doi:10.1143/PTPS.163.245. S2CID   118936307.
  15. Delia Schwartz-Perlov & Alexander Vilenkin (2006). "Probabilities in the Bousso-Polchinski multiverse". Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 0606 (6): 010. arXiv: hep-th/0601162 . Bibcode:2006JCAP...06..010S. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2006/06/010. S2CID   119337679.
  16. M. R. Douglas, "Statistical analysis of the supersymmetry breaking scale", arXiv : hep-th/0405279.
  17. V. Agrawal, S. M. Barr, J. F. Donoghue and D. Seckel, "Anthropic considerations in multiple domain theories and the scale of electroweak symmetry breaking", Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 1822 (1998).arXiv : hep-ph/9801253
  18. H. Baer, V. Barger, H. Serce and K. Sinha, "Higgs and superparticle mass predictions from the landscape", JHEP03, 002 (2018), arXiv : 1712.01399 .
  19. L. Susskind, The cosmic landscape: string theory and the illusion of intelligent design (Little, Brown, 2005). M. J. Rees, Just six numbers: the deep forces that shape the universe (Basic Books, 2001). R. Bousso and J. Polchinski, "The string theory landscape", Sci. Am.291, 60–69 (2004).
  20. Motl's blog criticized the anthropic principle and Woit's blog frequently attacks the anthropic string landscape.