Gender parity

Last updated

Gender parity is a statistical measure used to describe ratios between men and women, or boys and girls, in a given population. Gender parity may refer to the proportionate representation of men and women in a given group, also referred to as sex ratio, or it may mean the ratio between any quantifiable indicator among men against the same indicator among women. [1]

Contents

The terms gender parity and gender equality are sometimes used interchangeably but gender parity differs from gender equality in that it is a descriptive measure only and does not involve value judgments or argue for policy changes in the way gender equality. Gender parity is a goal of substantive gender equality, but not of formal gender equality. [2] Gender parity may be one of the important metrics used to assess the state of substantive gender equality within a group or organization.

Within the field of sociology, gender parity is generally understood to refer to a binary distinction between people based in identity and sex differences. [3] Though the word "gender" is part of the term, the meaning as it is used is closer to assigned sex than to gender identity. [4]

Health and survival

According to the World Economic Forum's Global Gender Gap Report 2020 global human health and survival is fairly close to gender parity at 95.7%. Irregularities in gender parity in health and survival over time and space make it difficult to draw statistically meaningful conclusions. [5] On a global average, men die younger and experience greater rates of illness than women, but gender parity scores become irregular when calculated on the basis of a particular disease or cause of death. [6] On average, gender parity scores for cardiovascular disease, suicide, certain cancers, and accidents fall below 1, meaning that these indicators are observed at greater rates among men. Global scores for stroke, lower respiratory infections, and breast cancer fall above 1, indicating that these are more often observed in women. [7] The lower life expectancy among men is largely due to disproportionate rates of male infant mortality versus female. [8]

In education

Percentage of countries that have achieved gender parity in their gross enrollment ratio, by education level, 2000 and 2017 Percentage of countries that have achieved gender parity in the gross enrolment ratio, by education level, 2000 and 2017.svg
Percentage of countries that have achieved gender parity in their gross enrollment ratio, by education level, 2000 and 2017

Gender parity in education can be calculated by dividing the number of female students at a given level of education by the number of male students at the same level. The resulting value is called a gender parity score. [9] A gender parity score between 0 and 1 shows a greater number of male students and any number over 1 indicates a greater number of female students in the population of interest. [9] [10] A population is considered to have achieved gender parity if it scores between .97 and 1.03. [11]

UNESCO gathers international gender parity scores relating to relative access to education among male and female individuals and compiles this data into the Gender Parity Index. This index is used by many organizations to assess gender parity and to monitor it over time.

Primary and secondary school

Enrollment rates

About 60% of countries have achieved gender parity in the enrollment rates of boys and girls between the ages of five and eighteen. [11] The regions of the Middle East/North Africa, Eastern/Southern, and South Asia score lowest in this area, with far fewer girls enrolling in elementary and high school than boys. [12]

Higher education

Enrollment rates

According to data from the World Bank, as of 2013 more women than men were enrolled in institutions of tertiary education globally. [13] Africa was the only continent where more men than women were found to be enrolled but this is with only of 25 of 54 countries reporting. [14] Mexico, Pakistan, Switzerland, and Greece have gender parity in tertiary education enrollment. [13]

In the United States, the average enrollment rate of female students has steadily increased over the past 30 years, from 63% up to 71%, while the average enrollment rate of male students has remained steady at 61%. [15]

Graduation rates

Gender parity in graduation rates from colleges and universities varies widely from region to region and a global average cannot be assessed at this time due to lack of data. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) does aggregate this data and across its 37 member countries more women hold tertiary degrees than do men. For the OECD countries, across the 25-34 age group, 39% of men and 51% of women hold tertiary degrees for a gender parity score of 1.3. [16] Compare this to the US tertiary degree attainment gender parity score of 1.1, with 63% of female students and 57% for male students completing their degrees. [17]

In the scientific authorship

Authorship of scientific research publications is a marker of academic achievement. [18] Hence, gender parity in the scientific authorship is imperative but it varies between disciplines. However, there is marked gender disparity in STEM where women scientists are under represented. [19] In translational and biomedical research, the proportion of men scientists at three prestigious author positions i.e. first, corresponding and last (mostly considered as a senior) authors is higher than women scientists; [20] however, the representation of women scientists at these authorship positions in increasing. [20]

In the workplace

Women are employed at lower rates than men all over the world and on average they enjoy less job security. Globally, men are unemployed at a rate of 5.5% while 6.2% of women are unemployed, although regional gender parity averages vary widely. [21] [22] Women are especially underrepresented in leadership positions and in higher wage jobs and they are overrepresented in lower wage jobs. Globally, wage increases have stagnated in lower wage sectors and this disproportionately affects female workers who are more likely to be employed in these jobs. [23] [24] This difference is less pronounced in the higher income countries of the global north.

Worldwide, 63% of the informal or self-employed work is done by women. [22] On average such jobs are lower paid, and have lower job security and safety than formal employment. Globally, women perform the vast majority of all unpaid labor such as care work, cooking, and cleaning. According to data from UN Women, women perform 2.5 times as much unpaid labor as men, averaging 4:11 hours a day compared with men's 1:31 in lower-income countries and 3:30 hours to men's 1:54 in high-income countries. [25] [22]

Representation in STEM

Women are underrepresented in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). This trend can be seen globally although the variations in terminology that exist make it impossible to make precise comparisons. [26] Jobs in STEM tend to be among the highest paying and because women are underrepresented in these fields, the average wage for men and women is affected resulting in a lower overall gender parity score.

Average income

On average, female workers in a given field are given lower pay than their male counterparts, averaging 77 cents for every dollar earned by men. [27] Movement towards gender parity in pay has stagnated in lower-income countries since 2010 although it saw a modest increase from 2018 to 2019. High-income countries have historically seen lower gender parity in pay as compared to that of lower-income countries. Over the past twenty years, high-income have seen a steady progression towards gender parity and now match the average for lower-income countries. [28]

The gender pay gap is calculated in two ways: the adjusted pay gap takes into account differences in hours worked, occupations chosen, level of education, and particular job, while the non-adjusted pay gap does not take any of these factors into its calculations and therefore demonstrates greater stratification.

Race, age, marital status, parenthood status, and other factors also play important compounding roles in pay inequality between men and women. Because women are less well represented in STEM fields which are experiencing the most job and wage growth, the global average wage parity statistics are further skewed in favor of men. [28]

In government and politics

Globally, men are more likely be involved in politics and to hold office than are women. According to the World Economic Forum's Global Gender Gap Report 2020, of all professions they assess, politics is the furthest from achieving gender parity. Progress is being made towards gender parity but it is happening more slowly than other sectors.

Women in executive government positions

The UN Women Facts and Figures on Women’s Leadership and Political Participation, states that there are only 21 countries in which women serve as Heads of State or Government and 119 countries have never had a woman leader. [29] Should we continue on this current trajectory, gender parity in the highest sectors of power will not be reached for another 130 years [29]

As of 2021, there are 10 countries who have a woman as Head of State, and 13 countries who have a woman as Head of Government. [29] Women make up only 21 percent of government ministers and only 14 countries have achieved 50 per cent or more women in cabinets. [29] With an annual increase of just 0.52 percentage points, gender parity in ministerial positions will not be achieved before 2077. [29] There is tremendous regional variation in gender parity: Nordic countries score 0.73; the Americas score 0.44; Europe excluding Nordic countries scores 0.37; sub-Saharan Africa scores 0.31; Asia scores 0.24; Arab states score 0.23; the Pacific scores 0.19. [30]

Women in national parliaments

As of 2021, women make up 25 percent of all national parliamentarians, which is up 16 percent from 11 percent in 1995. [29] There are only 4 countries which have achieved 50 per cent gender parity in single or lower houses; Rwanda, Cuba, Bolivia and the United Arab Emirates. [29]

There are 19 countries that have reached or surpassed the 40 per cent goal and two-thirds of those countries have implemented gender quotas to do so. [29]

Gender quotas

The purpose of implementing gender quotas, is to recruit women into political positions and to ensure that there is equal representation in policy [31] Gender quotas rule that women must constitute a certain number or percentage of a body of government. [31] According to International Idea's Gender Quota Database Archived 2019-06-08 at the Wayback Machine , there are three types of gender quotas: Reserved seats, Legal candidate quotas and Political party quotas. [31] The quota system places the responsibility of creating more diversity on those doing the recruiting rather than on individual women. [31] The main goal of this is to ensure that there is more equity and diversity in politics, so that governments better reflect the population they are representing. [31]

United Nations

The U.N. declaration of human rights specifies that men and women are of equal worth. [32] The UN is one of the political bodies that has explicitly expressed that gender parity in the participation at all levels of the UN system is a goal. [33] To achieve this, the UN has a Strategy on Gender Parity that identifies and tracks gender balance in the following areas: leadership and accountability, senior management, hiring and retention, and qualitative social experience of men and women. [34]

The United Nations is striving for gender parity in UN senior leadership by the year 2030. [35] Some departments/agencies of the UN include the Food and Agriculture Organization, World Health Organization, UN Secretariat, World Food Programme, UNESCO, UN High Commission for Refugees, International Labour Organization, UNICEF, and UN Women. [35] Out of these departments only UN Women has a greater percentage of women (75%) than men (25%) at the D1 Level management and above. [35] As of 2015, the departments that are the closest to gender parity at D1 level management is UNICEF at 49% women, 51% men, and UNESCO at 47% women, 53% men. [35]

Although gender parity has not yet been achieved, the United Nations have been adding women to the UN Peacekeeping missions. [35] As of 2018, women made up 3% of UN Peacekeeping force in Mali, 4% of the peacekeeping force in Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo and Golan Heights, 5% in Darfur, Lebanon and South Sudan, 7% in Haiti, 8% in Cyprus and Somalia, and 10% in Liberia and Sudan. [35]

Global Gender Gap Index

The Global Gender Gap Index finds gender parity by country as a whole using a variety of measures including health and survival rates, education rates/levels, opportunity to participate and engagement in politics and pay gap. [35]

The Global Gender Gap Index of 2017 shows that the most gender parity in the world is in Canada, Nicaragua, Bolivia, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Latvia, Germany, France, UK, Ireland, Iceland, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Namibia, Rwanda, Philippines, and New Zealand. Countries with the least gender parity in the world are Morocco, Algeria, Mauritania, Mali, Côte d'Ivoire, Chad, Turkey, Syria, Iran, Pakistan, Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Yemen. [35]

Indices

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Income distribution</span> How a countrys total GDP is distributed amongst its population

In economics, income distribution covers how a country's total GDP is distributed amongst its population. Economic theory and economic policy have long seen income and its distribution as a central concern. Unequal distribution of income causes economic inequality which is a concern in almost all countries around the world.

The Gender Development Index (GDI) is an index designed to measure gender equality.

Gender inequality is the social phenomenon in which people are not treated equally on the basis of gender. This inequality can be caused by gender discrimination or sexism. The treatment may arise from distinctions regarding biology, psychology, or cultural norms prevalent in the society. Some of these distinctions are empirically grounded, while others appear to be social constructs. While current policies around the world cause inequality among individuals, it is women who are most affected. Gender inequality weakens women in many areas such as health, education, and business life. Studies show the different experiences of genders across many domains including education, life expectancy, personality, interests, family life, careers, and political affiliation. Gender inequality is experienced differently across different cultures.

Gender inequality in India refers to health, education, economic and political inequalities between men and women in India. Various international gender inequality indices rank India differently on each of these factors, as well as on a composite basis, and these indices are controversial.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Global Gender Gap Report</span> Index designed to measure gender equality

The Global Gender Gap Report is an index designed to measure gender equality. It was first published in 2006 by the World Economic Forum.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gender Parity Index</span> Socioeconomic index

Released by UNESCO, the Gender Parity Index (GPI) is a socioeconomic index usually designed to measure the relative access to education of males and females. It is used by international organizations, particularly in measuring the progress of developing countries. For example, some UNESCO documents consider gender parity in literacy.

In the United States, despite the efforts of equality proponents, income inequality persists among races and ethnicities. Asian Americans have the highest median income, followed by White Americans, Hispanic Americans, African Americans, and Native Americans. A variety of explanations for these differences have been proposed—such as differing access to education, two parent home family structure, high school dropout rates and experience of discrimination and deep-seated and systemic anti-Black racism—and the topic is highly controversial.

In Russia the wage gap exists and statistical analysis shows that most of it cannot be explained by lower qualifications of women compared to men. On the other hand, occupational segregation by gender and labor market discrimination seem to account for a large share of it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Female labor force in the Muslim world</span> Involvement of Muslim women in labor

Female participation and advancement in majority Muslim countries, or nations in which more than 50% of the population identifies as an adherent of the Islamic faith, have traditionally been areas of controversy. Several Western nations, such as the United States and Western Europe, have criticised majority Muslim nations for the lack of involvement and opportunity for women in the private sector.

In South Korea, gender inequality is derived from deeply rooted patriarchal ideologies with specifically defined gender-roles. While it remains especially prevalent in South Korea's economy and politics, gender inequality has decreased in healthcare and education.

Gender inequality in the United States has been diminishing throughout its history and significant advancements towards equality have been made beginning mostly in the early 1900s. However, despite this progress, gender inequality in the United States continues to persist in many forms, including the disparity in women's political representation and participation, occupational segregation, and the unequal distribution of household labor. The alleviation of gender inequality has been the goal of several major pieces of legislation since 1920 and continues to the present day. As of 2021, the World Economic Forum ranks the United States 30th in terms of gender equality out of 149 countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gender pay gap</span> Average difference in remuneration amounts between men and women

The gender pay gap or gender wage gap is the average difference between the remuneration for men and women who are working. Women are generally found to be paid less than men. There are two distinct numbers regarding the pay gap: non-adjusted versus adjusted pay gap. The latter typically takes into account differences in hours worked, occupations chosen, education and job experience. In other words, the adjusted values represent how much women and men make for the same work, while the non-adjusted values represent how much the average man and woman make in total. In the United States, for example, the non-adjusted average woman's annual salary is 79–83% of the average man's salary, compared to 95–99% for the adjusted average salary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Women in the Czech Republic</span> Overview of the status of women in the Czech Republic

The Czech Republic provides a wide variety of civil rights to female citizens and Czech women have a long history of actively participating in Czech society. However, women in the Czech Republic continue to experience gender discrimination, particularly in the workforce and political arena.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gender inequality in Mexico</span> Overview of gender inequality in Mexico

Gender inequality in Mexico refers to disparate freedoms in health, education, and economic and political abilities between men and women in Mexico. It has been diminishing throughout history, but continues to persist in many forms including the disparity in women's political representation and participation, the gender pay gap, and high rates of domestic violence and femicide. As of 2022, the World Economic Forum ranks Mexico 31st in terms of gender equality out of 146 countries. Structural gender inequality is relatively homogeneous between the Mexican states as there are very few regional differences in the inequalities present.

Measures of gender equality or inequality are statistical tools employed to quantify the concept of gender equality.

The gender pay gap in New Zealand is the difference in the median hourly wages of men and women in New Zealand. In 2020 the gender pay gap is 9.5%. It is an economic indicator used to measure pay equality. The gender pay gap is an official statistic published annually by Stats NZ sourced from the Household Labour Force Survey.

Gender pay gap in India refers to the difference in earnings between women and men in the paid employment and the labor market. For the year 2013, the gender pay gap in India was estimated to be 24.81%. Further, while analyzing the level of female participation in the economy, this report slots India as one of the bottom 10 countries on its list. Thus, in addition to unequal pay, there is also unequal representation, because while women constitute almost half the Indian population, their representation in the work force amounts to only about one-fourth of the total.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Women in Iceland</span> Overview of the status of women in Iceland

Women in Iceland generally enjoy good gender equality. As of 2018, 88% of working-age women were employed, 65% of students attending university were female, and 41% of members of parliament were women. Nevertheless, women still earn about 14% less than men, though these statistics do not take into account the hours worked, over-time, and choices of employment. There is also the problem of younger women potentially out-earning men due to policies that are supposed to decrease the gender wage gap. Iceland has the world's highest proportion of women in the labour market and significant child care allocations for working women. It has gender neutral parental leave, with a quota for each parent, and a transferable part.

When it comes to gender equality in Latin America, Nicaragua ranks high amongst the other countries in the region. When it came to global rankings regarding gender equality, the World Economic Forum ranked Nicaragua at number twelve in 2015, while in 2016 it ranked tenth, and in 2017 the country ranked sixth.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gender gap in Pakistan</span>

The gender gap in Pakistan refers to the differences between men and women in Pakistan in terms of social, political, and economic participation and rights. The gender gap uses the gender ratio of Pakistan to compare the disparities between men and women in different fields, which mainly disadvantage women. According to the Global Gender Gap Index 2022, Pakistan ranks second to last in terms of the Gender Gap, with only 56.4% of its gender gap closed, a 0.8 percentage point increase from 2021. By percentage, men form about 51.46% and women form about 48.54% of the total population of Pakistan. The sex ratio of Pakistan is 106.010, that means there are about 106 men for every 100 women in Pakistan. The gender gap in Pakistan includes comparisons of gender differences in health, educational, legal, economical, and political aspects.

References

  1. ↑ "What Is 'Gender Parity'?". New America. Retrieved 2020-10-26.
  2. ↑ De Vos, M. (2020). The European Court of Justice and the march towards substantive equality in European Union anti-discrimination law. International Journal of Discrimination and the Law, 20(1), 62-87.
  3. ↑ Little, William (6 November 2014). "Chapter 12: Gender, Sex, and Sexuality". Introduction to Sociology. Compass OpenEd.
  4. ↑ Entwicklungspolitik, Deutsches Institut für. "From gender parity to gender equality: changing women's lived realities". www.die-gdi.de (in German). Retrieved 2020-10-27.
  5. ↑ "The Global Gender Gap Report 2018" (PDF). World Economic Forum. 2018.
  6. ↑ Crimmins, Eileen M.; Shim, Hyunju; Zhang, Yuan S.; Kim, Jung Ki (January 2019). "Differences between Men and Women in Mortality and the Health Dimensions of the Morbidity Process". Clinical Chemistry. 65 (1): 135–145. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2018.288332. ISSN   0009-9147. PMC   6345642 . PMID   30478135.
  7. ↑ "The top causes of death for women – and how to combat them". World Economic Forum. Retrieved 2020-10-30.
  8. ↑ "Why do women live longer than men?". Our World in Data. Retrieved 2020-10-30.
  9. 1 2 "unstats | Millennium Indicators". unstats.un.org. Archived from the original on 2020-10-30. Retrieved 2020-10-27.
  10. ↑ termcoord (2017-02-10). "IATE Term of the week: Gender Parity Index (GPI)". Terminology Coordination Unit. Retrieved 2020-10-29.
  11. 1 2 "Gender and education". UNICEF DATA. Retrieved 2020-10-27.
  12. ↑ "School enrollment, primary (gross), gender parity index (GPI) | Data". data.worldbank.org. Retrieved 2020-10-27.
  13. 1 2 Roser, Max; Ortiz-Ospina, Esteban (2013-07-17). "Tertiary Education". Our World in Data.
  14. ↑ "School enrollment, tertiary, female (% gross) | Data". data.worldbank.org. Retrieved 2020-10-28.
  15. ↑ "Gender gap in college enrollment". Pew Research Center. Retrieved 2020-10-28.
  16. ↑ "Population with tertiary education, 2009". 2012-06-13. doi:10.1787/eco_surveys-can-2012-graph32-en . Retrieved 2020-10-30.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  17. ↑ "Women Students – PNPI" . Retrieved 2020-10-27.
  18. ↑ Henderson, Lorna R.; Shah, Syed Ghulam Sarwar; Ovseiko, Pavel V.; Dam, Rinita; Buchan, Alastair M.; McShane, Helen; Kiparoglou, Vasiliki (2020-10-14). Sudzina, Frantisek (ed.). "Markers of achievement for assessing and monitoring gender equity in a UK National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre: A two-factor model". PLOS ONE. 15 (10): e0239589. Bibcode:2020PLoSO..1539589H. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239589 . ISSN   1932-6203. PMC   7556494 . PMID   33052933.
  19. ↑ Ovseiko, Pavel V; Taylor, Mark; Gilligan, Ruth E; Birks, Jacqueline; Elhussein, Leena; Rogers, Mike; Tesanovic, Sonja; Hernandez, Jazmin; Wells, Glenn; Greenhalgh, Trisha; Buchan, Alastair M (2020-10-26). "Effect of Athena SWAN funding incentives on women's research leadership". BMJ. 371: m3975. doi:10.1136/bmj.m3975. ISSN   1756-1833. PMID   33106283. S2CID   225063205.
  20. 1 2 Shah, Syed Ghulam Sarwar; Dam, Rinita; Milano, Maria Julia; Edmunds, Laurel D; Henderson, Lorna R; Hartley, Catherine R; Coxall, Owen; Ovseiko, Pavel V; Buchan, Alastair M; Kiparoglou, Vasiliki (March 2021). "Gender parity in scientific authorship in a National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre: a bibliometric analysis". BMJ Open. 11 (3): e037935. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037935. ISSN   2044-6055. PMC   7993305 . PMID   33757940.
  21. ↑ Zafar, Basit (February 2009). "College Major Choice and the Gender Gap" (PDF). Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports– via New York Fed.
  22. 1 2 3 Women, U. N. "Women in the changing world of work - Facts you should know". interactive.unwomen.org. Retrieved 2020-10-29.
  23. ↑ "Global wage growth falls to its lowest level in four years". www.ilo.org. 2016-12-15. Retrieved 2020-10-29.
  24. ↑ Ortiz-Ospina, Esteban; Roser, Max (2018-03-21). "Economic inequality by gender". Our World in Data.
  25. ↑ "Employment : Time spent in paid and unpaid work, by sex". stats.oecd.org. Retrieved 2020-10-29.
  26. ↑ Hanna, G; International Commission on Mathematical Instruction (2002). Towards gender equity in mathematics education: an ICMI study. New York: Kluwer Academic. ISBN   978-0-306-47205-3. OCLC   50322142. Archived from the original on 2021-04-16. Retrieved 2020-10-29.
  27. ↑ "Why do multinationals pay women less in developing countries?". World Economic Forum. Retrieved 2020-10-29.
  28. 1 2 "Global Gender Gap Report 2020". World Economic Forum. Retrieved 2020-10-29.
  29. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 "Facts and figures: Women's leadership and political participation". UN WOMEN. Retrieved 4 February 2021.
  30. ↑ "Facts and figures: Leadership and political participation". UN Women. Retrieved 2020-10-30.
  31. 1 2 3 4 5 Dahlerup, Drude. "Gender Quotas Database". International Idea Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. Archived from the original on 8 June 2019. Retrieved 4 February 2021.
  32. ↑ "Universal Declaration of Human Rights". www.un.org. 2015-10-06. Retrieved 2020-10-27.
  33. ↑ "How We Work: Gender parity in the United Nations". UN Women. Retrieved 2020-10-29.
  34. ↑ "UNITED for GENDER PARITY |". www.un.org. Retrieved 2020-10-29.
  35. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Seager, Joni (2018). The Women's Atlas. Oxford: Myriad Editions. pp. 5, 14, 34, 195. ISBN   978-1-912408-31-3.

Bibliography

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.