Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus

Last updated
Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued April 22, 2014
Decided June 16, 2014
Full case nameSusan B. Anthony List, et al., Petitioners v. Steven Driehaus, et al.
Docket no. 13-193
Citations573 U.S. 149 ( more )
134 S. Ct. 2334; 189 L. Ed. 2d 246
Argument Oral argument
Opinion announcement Opinion announcement
Case history
PriorMotion to dismiss granted, 805 F. Supp. 2d 412 (S.D. Ohio 2011); affirmed, 525 F. App'x 415 (6th Cir. 2013); cert. granted, 571 U.S. 1118(2014).
SubsequentOn remand, 45 F. Supp. 3d 765 (S.D. Ohio 2014); affirmed, 814 F.3d 466 (6th Cir. 2016).
Holding
Pre-enforcement legal challenges have Article III standing when the petitioners' prospect of injury is imminent.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Antonin Scalia  · Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas  · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer  · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor  · Elena Kagan
Case opinion
MajorityThomas, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
U.S. Const. Art. III

Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus, 573 U.S. 149 (2014), is a United States Supreme Court case.

Contents

Synopsis of case

In the 2010 campaign, Susan B. Anthony List purchased billboard advertisements in the district of former U.S. Representative Steve Driehaus of Ohio that showed a photo of Driehaus and said, "Shame on Steve Driehaus! Driehaus voted FOR taxpayer-funded abortion." [1] The advertisement referred to Driehaus's vote in favor of the health care overhaul bill. [2]

Susan B. Anthony List takes the position that the health care legislation allows for taxpayer-funded abortion, a claim which was ruled by a judge to be factually incorrect. [3] In response, Driehaus, who represented the heavily pro-life [1] 1st congressional district of Ohio, filed a complaint with the Ohio Elections Commission (OEC), stating that the advertisements were false and violated Ohio election law. [4] The OEC ruled in Driehaus' favor in a probable cause hearing on October 14, 2010.[ citation needed ]

In response, the SBA List asked a federal judge to issue an injunction against the OEC on the grounds that the law at issue stifles free speech [4] [5] and that its ads were based on the group’s own interpretation of the law. [3] The American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio filed an 18-page amicus brief on the SBA List's behalf, arguing that the Ohio law in question is "unconstitutionally vague" and has a "chilling" effect on the SBA List's right to freedom of speech. [6] [7] A federal judge rejected the SBA List's federal lawsuit on abstention grounds and allowed Driehaus's OEC complaint to move forward. [2] [8]

After the OEC complaint was filed, the SBA List began airing a radio ad in Driehaus's district in which Marjorie Dannenfelser stated that the group "[would] not be silenced or intimidated" by Driehaus's legal action. [9] Driehaus ended up losing his seat to Steve Chabot in the November election. Driehaus then sued the SBA List in a second case on December 3, 2010, accusing the organization of defamation that caused him a "loss of livelihood". [10] The SBA List continued seeking to have the law in question overturned; the ACLU joined in the organization's fight against the law. [11]

On August 1, 2011, Judge Timothy Black dismissed the SBA List's challenge to the Ohio law, holding that the federal court lacked jurisdiction since the billboards were never erected and the OEC never made a final ruling [12] [13] and denied a motion for summary judgment by SBA List in the defamation case, allowing Driehaus's defamation claims regarding other SBA List statements to go forward. [14] Black also required that SBA List stop claiming on its website that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act subsidized abortion, because it did not directly mention abortion. [15] SBA List argued that its statements were opinions and were thus protected, but the court rejected this argument given that SBA List itself had claimed that this was a "fact." [16] [17] On August 19, 2011, the SBA List appealed the decision on the Ohio law to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. [18] In May 2013, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the SBA List could not challenge the law under the First Amendment. [19] [20]

Supreme Court

On August 9, 2013, the SBA List petitioned the United States Supreme Court to review the law. [21] [22] On January 10, 2014, the Supreme Court accepted the case. The Court heard the case on April 22, 2014. [23]

Several amici curiae filed briefs.

Justice Clarence Thomas, on behalf of a unanimous Supreme Court, reversed the judgement of the two lower courts and remanded the case to the lower courts so that the SBA List could pursue its constitutional rights against the Ohio law. [23] The Supreme Court ruled on whether SBA List could move forward with its challenge to the law, given that the proceedings against it had been stopped by former Congressman Driehaus. [24] Thomas wrote that the "Petitioners have alleged a credible threat of enforcement of the Ohio law". [23] [24] Thomas wrote that in the case there was a credible threat of harm in the form of a burden imposed on the electoral speech, where SBA List is being forced, even if they ultimately prevail, to divert significant time and resources to hire legal counsel and respond to discovery requests in the crucial days before an election. [23] [24]

Law struck down by district court

After the Supreme Court decision, the SBA List challenged the constitutionality of the Ohio law in federal court in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Susan B. Anthony List v. Ohio Elections Commission. On September 11, 2014, Judge Timothy Black struck down the law as unconstitutional. [25] Black said in his ruling, "We do not want the government (i.e., the Ohio Elections Commission) deciding what is political truth — for fear that the government might persecute those who criticize it. Instead, in a democracy, the voters should decide." [26]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">American Civil Liberties Union</span> Legal advocacy organization in the United States

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is an American nonprofit organization founded in 1920 "to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to every person in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States". The ACLU works through litigation and lobbying and has over 1,800,000 members as of July 2018, with an annual budget of over $300 million. Affiliates of the ACLU are active in all 50 states, Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico. The ACLU provides legal assistance in cases where it considers civil liberties at risk. Legal support from the ACLU can take the form of direct legal representation or preparation of amicus curiae briefs expressing legal arguments when another law firm is already providing representation.

Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, 546 U.S. 320 (2006), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving a facial challenge to New Hampshire's parental notification abortion law. The First Circuit had ruled that the law was unconstitutional and an injunction against its enforcement was proper. The Supreme Court vacated this judgment and remanded the case, but avoided a substantive ruling on the challenged law or a reconsideration of prior Supreme Court abortion precedent. Instead, the Court only addressed the issue of remedy, holding that invalidating a statute in its entirety "is not always necessary or justified, for lower courts may be able to render narrower declaratory and injunctive relief."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thomas More Law Center</span> Christian conservative law firm in Michigan, US

The Thomas More Law Center is a Christian, conservative, nonprofit, public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, and active throughout the United States. According to the Thomas More Law Center website, its goals are to "preserve America's Judeo-Christian heritage, defend the religious freedom of Christians, restore time-honored moral and family values, protect the sanctity of human life, and promote a strong national defense and a free and sovereign United States of America."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Center for Constitutional Rights</span> U.S. nonprofit organization

The Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) is a progressive non-profit legal advocacy organization based in New York City, New York, in the United States. It was founded in 1966 by Arthur Kinoy, William Kunstler and others particularly to support activists in the implementation of civil rights legislation and to achieve social justice.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Steve Driehaus</span> American politician (born 1966)

Steven Leo Driehaus is an American politician and former U.S. Representative for Ohio's 1st congressional district, serving from 2009 until 2011. A member of the Democratic Party, he previously served as the Minority Whip in the Ohio House of Representatives.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sholom Rubashkin</span> Former executive officer of Agriprocessors

Sholom Mordechai Rubashkin was a convicted felon and the former CEO of Agriprocessors, a now-bankrupt kosher slaughterhouse and meat packing plant in Postville, Iowa, formerly owned by his father, Aaron Rubashkin. During his time as CEO of the plant, Agriprocessors grew into one of the nation's largest kosher meat producers, but was also cited for issues involving animal cruelty, food safety, environmental safety, child labor, and hiring undocumented immigrants.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America</span> US anti-abortion organization

Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America is a 501(c)(4) non-profit organization that seeks to reduce and ultimately end abortion in the U.S. by supporting anti-abortion politicians, primarily women, through its SBA List Candidate Fund political action committee.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Doe v. Gonzales</span> 2004 US lawsuit

John Doe v. Alberto R. Gonzales was a case in which the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Library Connection, and several then-pseudonymous librarians, challenged Section 2709 of the Patriot Act; it was consolidated on appeal with a separate case, Doe v. Ashcroft.

James Bopp Jr. is an American conservative lawyer. He is most known for his work associated with election laws, anti-abortion model legislation, and campaign finance.

Davis v. Bandemer, 478 U.S. 109 (1986), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that claims of partisan gerrymandering were justiciable, but failed to agree on a clear standard for the judicial review of the class of claims of a political nature to which such cases belong. The decision was later limited with respect to many of the elements directly involving issues of redistricting and political gerrymandering, but was somewhat broadened with respect to less significant ancillary procedural issues. Democrats had won 51.9% of the votes, but only 43/100 seats. Democrats sued on basis of one man, one vote, however, California Democrats supported the Indiana GOP's plan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Citizens in Charge Foundation</span> American non-profit advocacy organization

The Citizens in Charge Foundation (CCF) is a nonprofit, non-partisan organization that advocates in favor of direct democracy. It was founded by libertarian activist Paul Jacob who has served as its president since its founding in 2001.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Center for Reproductive Rights</span> American non-profit organization

The Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR) is a global legal advocacy organization, headquartered in New York City, that seeks to advance reproductive rights, such as abortion. The organization's stated mission is to "use the law to advance reproductive freedom as a fundamental human right that all governments are legally obligated to protect, respect, and fulfill." Founded by Janet Benshoof in 1992, its original name was the Center for Reproductive Law and Policy.

Citizens for Equal Protection v. Bruning, 455 F.3d 859, was a federal lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska and decided on appeal by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. It challenged the federal constitutionality of Nebraska Initiative Measure 416, a 2000 ballot initiative that amended the Nebraska Constitution to prohibit the recognition of same-sex marriages, civil unions, and other same-sex relationships.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Heartbeat bill</span> Legislation intending to ban abortions after the conceptus heartbeat can be detected

A six-week abortion ban, also called a "fetal heartbeat bill" by proponents, is a law in the United States which makes abortion illegal as early as six weeks gestational age, which is when proponents falsely claim that a "fetal heartbeat" can be detected. Medical and reproductive health experts, including the American Medical Association and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, say that the reference to a fetal heartbeat is medically inaccurate and intentionally misleading because a conceptus is not called a fetus until eight weeks after fertilization, as well as that at four weeks after fertilization, the embryo has no heart, only a group of cells which will become a heart. Medical professionals advise that a true fetal heartbeat cannot be detected until around 17 to 20 weeks of gestation when the chambers of the heart have become sufficiently developed.

Christopher A. Hansen is an American civil rights attorney, notable for litigating many cases while at the ACLU, including the AMP v. Myriad Genetics (2013) case at the US Supreme Court and the ACLU's efforts in ACLU v. Reno (1997). Hansen was at the ACLU for 40 years, from 1973 to 2013, retiring as Senior National Staff Counsel, and the ACLU's longest-serving attorney.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Washington State Department of Health</span> Washington state agency, headquartered in Olympia, Washington

The Washington State Department of Health is a state agency of Washington. It is headquartered in Olympia, Washington. The agency was created by the state legislature in May 1989 after splitting from the Washington State Department of Social and Health Services.

<i>Wikimedia Foundation v. NSA</i> Lawsuit against the U.S. National Security Agency

Wikimedia Foundation, et al. v. National Security Agency, et al. is a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation and several other organizations against the National Security Agency (NSA), the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), and other named individuals, alleging mass surveillance of Wikipedia users carried out by the NSA. The suit claims the surveillance system, which NSA calls "Upstream", breaches the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, which protects freedom of speech, and the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures.

<i>Washington v. Trump</i> Lawsuit challenging Executive Order 13769

State of Washington and State of Minnesota v. Trump, 847 F.3d 1151, was a lawsuit that challenged the constitutionality of Executive Order 13769, issued by U.S. president Donald Trump.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on abortion in the United States</span> Impact of COVID-19

Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, anti-abortion government officials in several American states enacted or attempted to enact restrictions on abortion, characterizing it as a non-essential procedure that can be suspended during the medical emergency. The orders have led to several legal challenges and criticism by abortion-rights groups and several national medical organizations, including the American Medical Association. Legal challenges on behalf of abortion providers, many of which are represented by the American Civil Liberties Union and Planned Parenthood, have successfully stopped some of the orders on a temporary basis, though bans in several states have not been challenged.

<i>Novak v. City of Parma</i> 2022 decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Novak v. City of Parma, No. 21-3290, is a 2022 decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granting qualified immunity to the city of Parma, Ohio, and its officials for prosecuting Anthony Novak over a Facebook page that parodied the Parma Police Department's page. The case drew widespread attention when The Onion, a satirical newspaper, filed a humorous but sincere amicus curiae brief supporting Novak's petition to the United States Supreme Court for certiorari; that petition was denied in February 2023.

References

  1. 1 2 Hunt, Kasie (October 7, 2010). "Driehaus sues to stop abortion attacks". Politico. Retrieved February 12, 2021.
  2. 1 2 Hunt, Kasie (October 26, 2010). "Driehaus suit against SBA List moves forward". Politico. Retrieved February 12, 2021.
  3. 1 2 Judge: Reform doesn't fund abortion
  4. 1 2 Ohio Democrat files election complaint over pro-life group’s billboard
  5. ↑ FOX News: SBA List fights for billboards
  6. ↑ ACLU joins fight over anti-Driehaus billboards
  7. ↑ ACLU of Ohio Files Amicus Brief on SBA List's Behalf
  8. ↑ Federal Judge Denies Ohio Election Law Challenge From Susan B. Anthony List [ permanent dead link ]
  9. ↑ SBA List radio ad
  10. ↑ Rep. Driehaus files defamation lawsuit over SBA List’s abortion funding claims
  11. ↑ Battle over Ohio law that targeted anti-abortion ads heats up
  12. ↑ Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus, 805F. Supp. 2d412 (S.D. Ohio2011).
  13. ↑ Driehaus wins abortion billboard battles
  14. ↑ Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus, 805F. Supp. 2d423 (S.D. Ohio2011).
  15. ↑ Mann, Benjamin. "Defamation Lawsuit Against Susan B. Anthony List Continues | Daily News". NCRegister.com. Retrieved 2011-12-30.
  16. ↑ Bassett, Laura (October 13, 2011). "Protect Life Act Passes House: Congress Passes Controversial Anti-Abortion Bill". Huffington Post.
  17. ↑ Baker, Sam (August 1, 2011). "Court: No tax-funded abortion in healthcare law". The Hill.
  18. ↑ SBA List appeals ruling on healthcare law and abortion
  19. ↑ Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus,525Fed. App'x415(6th Cir.2013).
  20. ↑ SBA List Petitions Supreme Court in First Amendment Case
  21. ↑ Anti-abortion group asks Supreme Court to strike limits on political speech
  22. ↑ Supreme Court petition No. 13-193
  23. 1 2 3 4 Susan B. Anthony List, et al. v. Steven Driehaus, et al., no. 13-193, (docket ). Retrieved April 7, 2014.
  24. 1 2 3 Volokh, Eugene (June 16, 2014). "Anti-abortion group may proceed with its challenge to Ohio's ban on knowing/reckless false statements in election campaigns". Washington Post . Washington, D.C.: Washington Post Media. Retrieved June 17, 2014.
  25. ↑ Judge strikes down Ohio law on election lies
  26. ↑ Susan B. Anthony List v. Ohio Elections Comm'n, 45F. Supp. 3d765 , 769(S.D. Ohio2014).
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.