Esing Bakery incident

Last updated

Esing Bakery incident
Esing Bakery, 1857.jpg
Esing Bakery, from The Illustrated London News (1857)
Date15 January 1857 (1857-01-15)
Location Victoria, British Hong Kong
Cause Arsenic poisoning
Casualties
300–500 taken ill, predominantly Europeans
Deaths0 at the time of the event, 3 from long-term consequences
Arrests57 Chinese men
AccusedCheong Ah-lum and 9 others
Charges"Administering poison with intent to kill and murder" [1]
VerdictNot guilty

Soon after the first alarm, I endeavoured to ascertain in a hasty way what was in the bread, and Dr Bradford coming in, he and I satisfied ourselves that it was arsenic. Next day, at the request of the Colonial Secretary, we made a more careful analysis of each piece of bread separately, and found they all indicated the presence of arsenic. ... we found that one pound [0.45 kg] loaf of bread contained nearly a drachm of arsenic, sixty grains to the drachm, common white arsenic. ... I also, on the afternoon of the 16th, had two jars brought me by a policeman, one containing yeast used on the night of the 14th, the other the materials for making yeast, together with some flour and some pastry from the bakery, paste scraped from the table, and some pastry in tin moulds. I found no trace of arsenic or other metallic poison in any of the materials. [34] [n 5]

Portions of the poisoned bread were subsequently sealed and dispatched to Europe, where they were examined by the chemists Frederick Abel [15] and Justus von Liebig, and the Scottish surgeon John Ivor Murray. [35] Murray found the incident to be scientifically interesting because of the low number of deaths that resulted from the ingestion of such a massive quantity of arsenic. Chemical tests enabled him to obtain 62.3 grains of arsenous acid per pound of bread (9 parts per thousand), while Liebig found 64 grains/lb (10 parts per thousand). [35] Liebig theorised that the poison had failed to act because it was vomited out before digestion could take place. [35]

Effects and aftermath

Reception in Britain

Lord Palmerston in 1857 (National Portrait Gallery, London) Henry John Temple, 3rd Viscount Palmerston.jpg
Lord Palmerston in 1857 (National Portrait Gallery, London)

News of the incident reached Britain during the 1857 general election, [36] which had been called following a successful parliamentary vote of censure of Lord Palmerston's support for the Second Opium War. [37] Mustering support for Palmerston and his war policy, the London Morning Post decried the poisoning in hyperbolic terms, describing it as a "hideous villainy, [an] unparalleled treachery, of these monsters of China", "defeated ... by its very excess of iniquity"; its perpetrators were "noxious animals ... wild beasts in human shape, without one single redeeming value" and "demons in human shape". [36] Another newspaper supportive of Palmerston, the Globe , published a fabricated letter by Cheong admitting that he "had acted agreeably to the order of the Viceroy [Ye Mingchen]". [38] By the time the news of Cheong's acquittal was published in London on 11 April, the election was all but over, and Palmerston was victorious. [39]

In London, the incident came to the attention of the German author Friedrich Engels, who wrote to the New York Herald Tribune on 22 May 1857, saying that the Chinese now "poison the bread of the European community at Hong Kong by wholesale, and with the coolest premeditation". "In short, instead of moralizing on the horrible atrocities of the Chinese", he argued, "as the chivalrous English press does, we had better recognize that this is a war pro aris et focis , a popular war for the maintenance of Chinese nationality, with all its overbearing prejudice, stupidity, learned ignorance and pedantic barbarism if you like, but yet a popular war." [40]

Others in England denied that the poisoning had even happened. In the House of Commons, Thomas Perronet Thompson alleged that the incident had been fabricated as part of a campaign of disinformation justifying the Second Opium War. [41] Much of the disbelief centred on Cheong's name, which became an object of sarcasm and humour—bakers in 19th-century Britain often adulterated their dough with potassium alum, or simply 'alum', as a whitener [42] —and Lowe and McLaughlin note that "a baker named Cheong Alum would have been considered funny by itself, but a baker named Cheong Alum accused of adding poison to his own dough seemed too good to be true". An official of the Colonial Office annotated a report on Cheong from Hong Kong with the remark, "Surely a mythical name". [43]

Hong Kong

Governor of Hong Kong John Bowring Sir John Bowring.jpg
Governor of Hong Kong John Bowring

Both the scale of the poisoning and its potential consequences make the Esing bakery incident unprecedented in the history of the British Empire, [44] with the colonists believing at the time that its success could have destroyed their community. [18]

Morris describes the incident as "a dramatic realization of that favourite Victorian chiller, the Yellow Peril", [45] and the affair contributed to the tensions between the European and Chinese communities in Hong Kong. In a state of panic, [46] the colonial government conducted mass arrests and deportations of Chinese residents in the wake of the poisonings. [47] 100 new police officers were hired and a merchant ship was commissioned to patrol the waters surrounding Hong Kong. Governor Bowring wrote to London requesting the dispatch of 5,000 soldiers to Hong Kong. [46] A proclamation was issued reaffirming the curfew on Chinese residents, and Chinese ships were ordered to be kept beyond 300 yards (270 m) of Hong Kong, by force if necessary. [48] Chan Tsz-tin described the aftermath in his letter (see above):

... the English barbarians are in very great perplexity; that a proclamation is issued every day, and three sets of regulations come out in two days. People out at night are taken up in a haste, and let go in a hurry; no one is allowed out after 8 o'clock; the shops are forced to take out tickets at sixteen dollars each. [49]

The Esing Bakery was closed, and the supply of bread to the colonial community was taken over by the English entrepreneur George Duddell, [50] described by the historian Nigel Cameron as "one of the colony's most devious crooks". [51] Duddell's warehouse was attacked in an arson incident on 6 March 1857, indicative of the continuing problems in the colony. [50] In the same month, one of Duddell's employees was reported to have discussed being offered $2,000 to adulterate biscuit dough with a soporific—the truth of this allegation is unknown. [22] Soon after the poisoning, Hong Kong was rocked by the Caldwell affair, a series of scandals and controversies involving Bridges, Tarrant, Anstey, and other members of the administration, similarly focused on race relations in the colony. [52]

Cheong himself made a prosperous living in Macau and Vietnam after his departure from Hong Kong, and later became consul for the Qing Empire in Vietnam. He died in 1900. [24] A portion of the poisoned bread, well-preserved by its high arsenic content, was kept in a cabinet of the office of the Chief Justice of the Hong Kong Supreme Court until the 1930s. [45]

Notes

  1. Also spelled ESing, E-sing, or E Sing.
  2. Also spelled A(-)lum, Allum, Ahlum, or Ah Lum instead of Ah-lum, or Cheung instead of Cheong.
  3. Murray lists the ten men as Cheong A-lum, Cheong Achew, Cheong Aheep, Cheong Achok, Lum Asow, Tam Aleen, Fong Angee, Cheong Amun, Fong Achut, and Cheong Wye Kong: Murray 1858 , p. 13.
  4. 1 2 Multiple currencies were in circulation in early British Hong Kong, including Mexican or Spanish dollars as well as the pound sterling: Munn 2009 , p. xiv.
  5. A drachm is a small weight, equal to one eighth of one troy ounce (31 g), or about 3.9 grams. A grain is the smallest unit of weight, with 7000 grains in one pound (0.45 kg). A drachm of arsenic in this sized loaf of bread is therefore equivalent to 9 parts per thousand.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">First Opium War</span> 1839–1842 war between Britain and China

The First Opium War, also known as the Anglo-Chinese War, was a series of military engagements fought between the British Empire and the Qing dynasty of China between 1839 and 1842. The immediate issue was the Chinese enforcement of their ban on the opium trade by seizing private opium stocks from merchants at Canton and threatening to impose the death penalty for future offenders. Despite the opium ban, the British government supported the merchants' demand for compensation for seized goods, and insisted on the principles of free trade and equal diplomatic recognition with China. Opium was Britain's single most profitable commodity trade of the 19th century. After months of tensions between the two states, the British navy launched an expedition in June 1840, which ultimately defeated the Chinese using technologically superior ships and weapons by August 1842. The British then imposed the Treaty of Nanking, which forced China to increase foreign trade, give compensation, and cede Hong Kong Island to the British. Consequently the opium trade continued in China. Twentieth-century nationalists considered 1839 the start of a century of humiliation, and many historians consider it the beginning of modern Chinese history.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Second Opium War</span> 1856–1860 war between allied British–French forces and Imperial China

The Second Opium War, also known as the Second Anglo-Sino War, the Second China War, the Arrow War, or the Anglo-French expedition to China, was a colonial war lasting from 1856 to 1860, which pitted the British Empire and the French Empire against the Qing dynasty of China.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Bowring</span> English politician

Sir John Bowring, or Phraya Siamanukulkij Siammitrmahayot was a British political economist, traveller, writer, literary translator, polyglot and the fourth Governor of Hong Kong. He was appointed by Queen Victoria as emissary to Siam, later he was appointed by King Mongkut of Siam as ambassador to London, also making a treaty of amity with Siam on April 18, 1855, now referred to as the "Bowring Treaty". His namesake treaty was fully effective for 70 years, until the reign of Vajiravudh. This treaty was gradually edited and became completely ineffective in 1938 under the government of Plaek Phibunsongkhram. Later, he was sent as a commissioner of Britain to the newly created Kingdom of Italy in 1861. He died in Claremont in Devon on 23 November 1872.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Harry Parkes (diplomat)</span> British diplomat

Sir Harry Smith Parkes was a British diplomat who served as Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary and Consul General of the United Kingdom to the Empire of Japan from 1865 to 1883 and the Chinese Qing Empire from 1883 to 1885, and Minister to Korea in 1884. Parkes Street in Kowloon, Hong Kong is named after him.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Henry Pottinger</span> Anglo-Irish soldier

Lieutenant-General Sir Henry Pottinger, 1st Baronet, was an Anglo-Irish soldier and colonial administrator who became the first Governor of Hong Kong.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of Hong Kong (1800s–1930s)</span>

Hong Kong (1800s–1930s) oversaw the founding of the new crown colony of Hong Kong under the British Empire. After the First Opium War, the territory was ceded by the Qing Empire to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland through Treaty of Nanjing (1842) and Convention of Peking (1860) in perpetuity, with additional land was leased to the British under the Convention for the Extension of Hong Kong Territory (1898), Hong Kong became one of the first parts of East Asia to undergo industrialisation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Convention for the Extension of Hong Kong Territory</span> 1898 treaty between China and the United Kingdom

The Convention between the United Kingdom and China, Respecting an Extension of Hong Kong Territory, commonly known as the Convention for the Extension of Hong Kong Territory or the Second Convention of Peking, was a lease signed between Qing China and the United Kingdom in Peking on 9 June 1898, leasing to the United Kingdom for 99 years, at no charge, the New Territories and northern Kowloon, including 235 islands.

A hong was a type of Chinese merchant establishment and its associated type of building. Hongs arose in Guangzhou as intermediaries between Western and Chinese merchants during the 18–19th century, under the Canton System.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ye Mingchen</span> Chinese official

Ye Mingchen was a high-ranking Chinese official during the Qing dynasty, known for his resistance to British influence in Canton (Guangzhou) in the aftermath of the First Opium War and his role in the beginning of the Second Opium War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Canton–Hong Kong strike</span> Boycott and strike in Hong Kong and China

The Canton–Hong Kong strike was a strike and boycott that took place in British Hong Kong and Guangzhou (Canton), Republic of China, from June 1925 to October 1926. It started out as a response to the May 30 Movement shooting incidents in which Chinese protesters were fired upon by Sikh detachments of the Shanghai Municipal Police in Shanghai.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">British Hong Kong</span> British colony and dependent territory from 1841 to 1997

Hong Kong was a colony of the British Empire and later a dependent territory of the United Kingdom from 1841 to 1997, apart from a period of Japanese occupation from 1941 to 1945 during the Pacific War. The colonial period began with the British occupation of Hong Kong Island in 1841, during the First Opium War between the British and the Qing dynasty. The Qing had wanted to enforce its prohibition of opium importation within the dynasty that was being exported mostly from British India and was causing widespread addiction among the populace.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Walter Hulme</span> Chief Justice of Hong Kong from 1844 to 1859

John Walter Hulme was a British lawyer and Judge. He was the first Chief Justice of Hong Kong, taking office in 1844.

Catherine Ann Janvier was an American artist, author, and translator. Before she married, she had an established career as an artist and teacher under the name Catherine Ann Drinker.

Daniel Richard Francis Caldwell was a colonial government official in Hong Kong. He was Registrar General and Protector of Chinese from 1856 to 1862 and was involved in the notorious Caldwell Affair in the late 1850s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cumsingmoon</span> Anchorage in Zhuhai, Guangdong, China

Cumsingmoon or Jinxingmen is an anchorage in Zhuhai, Guangdong, on the southern coast of China, within the Pearl River estuary and close to the former European colonies of Macao and Hong Kong.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Thomas Bridges</span>

William Thomas Bridges was a lawyer and public servant in British Hong Kong, where he held the post of Acting Colonial Secretary from 1857 to 1858. He was born in 1820 or 1821 in Blackheath, Kent. Having studied at Winchester College and Corpus Christi College, Oxford, Bridges was called to the Bar at the Middle Temple in 1847. He emigrated to Hong Kong in April 1851 and rose rapidly in local society owing to his special status as a qualified barrister in a colony short of legal experts, becoming Acting Attorney General within a year of his arrival. After a sojourn in England in 1856, where he was awarded an honorary Doctorate of Civil Law, Bridges became a provisional member of the Executive and Legislative Councils upon his return to Hong Kong, and was appointed Acting Colonial Secretary while the incumbent secretary, William Thomas Mercer, was on leave in 1857.

William Tarrant was a civil servant and newspaper editor in British Hong Kong. He served as Inspector of Land and Roads and subsequently Registrar of Deeds in the Hong Kong colonial administration from 1842 to 1847, but was removed from office and barred from public service owing to allegations he had raised against Colonial Secretary William Caine, which an internal government inquiry held to be fabricated. Tarrant then began a new career in journalism, purchasing the Friend of China newspaper in 1850. He became prominently involved in a scandal involving multiple senior government officers, the Caldwell affair, in 1857, and was ultimately found guilty of libel and imprisoned in 1859. He left the colony after his release in 1860, and made two attempts over the course of the 1860s to restart the Friend of China in Guangzhou and Shanghai, each proving abortive. Finally, he sold the paper in 1869 and retired to England, where he died in 1872.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lowe Kong Meng</span> Chinese-Australian businessman (died 1888)

Lowe Kong Meng was a Chinese-Australian businessman. Born into a trading family in Penang, Kong Meng learned English and French at an early age and worked as an importing merchant around the Indian Ocean. In 1853 he moved to Melbourne where he started a business importing goods for Chinese miners during the Victorian gold rush. After 1860, as the Chinese population in Melbourne peaked, he diversified into other lines of business, including investing in the Commercial Bank of Australia. Kong Meng was a prominent and well-regarded member of Melbourne's elite, and for a time was one of the city's wealthiest men. He was a leading defender of Chinese Australians at a time when their status was politically controversial and they were subjected to targeted taxation, discrimination and violence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cheok Hong Cheong</span> Chinese-Australian missionary and activist (1851–1928)

Cheok Hong Cheong, also known as Zhang Zhuoxiong, was a Chinese-born Australian missionary, political activist, writer, and businessman. Originally a Presbyterian elder, he became the superintendent of the Anglican mission in Melbourne. A staunch campaigner against anti-Chinese sentiment in Australia, he co-authored a booklet titled The Chinese Question in Australia (1879) with Lowe Kong Meng and Louis Ah Mouy. He was also opposed to the British opium trade.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Lowe & McLaughlin 2015 , p. 191.
  2. Carroll 2007 , p. 12.
  3. Munn 2009 , pp. 39, 38.
  4. Carroll 2007 , p. 48.
  5. Tsai 2015 , pp. 12–3.
  6. Carroll 2007 , p. 19.
  7. Munn 2009 , p. 57.
  8. Carroll 2007 , p. 21.
  9. 1 2 Tsai 2015 , p. 13.
  10. Lowe & McLaughlin 2015 , p. 192.
  11. Munn 2009 , p. 278.
  12. Lowe & McLaughlin 2015 , pp. 193–4.
  13. 1 2 湯, 開建 (2018). 陳, 超敏 (ed.). 清代香山鐵城張氏家族與澳門的關係──以《曲江張氏族譜香山鐵城宗支譜》為中心展開 (PDF). 澳門研究. 澳門基金會 (88): 121, 123. ISSN   0872-8526.
  14. 1 2 3 Lowe & McLaughlin 2015 , p. 190.
  15. 1 2 3 4 Lowe & McLaughlin 2015 , p. 197.
  16. Pope-Hennessy 1969 , p. 57.
  17. 1 2 Lowe & McLaughlin 2015 , p. 196
  18. 1 2 3 4 Carroll 2007 , p. 26.
  19. 1 2 Lowe & McLaughlin 2015 , pp. 190–191.
  20. Lowe & McLaughlin 2015 , p. 200
  21. Pope-Hennessy 1969 , p. 58.
  22. 1 2 Lowe & McLaughlin 2015 , p. 198.
  23. Norton-Kyshe 1898 , p. 416
  24. 1 2 3 Schoonakker 2007.
  25. Lowe & McLaughlin 2015 , pp. 199–200.
  26. Bowman 2016 , p. 307.
  27. Ingham 2007 , p. 64.
  28. Bowman 2016 , pp. 307–8.
  29. 1 2 Munn 2009 , p. 283.
  30. Cho 2017 , p. 282.
  31. Cameron 1991 , p. 83.
  32. Lowe & McLaughlin 2015 , p. 194.
  33. Lowe & McLaughlin 2015 , pp. 197–8.
  34. Murray 1858, p. 14.
  35. 1 2 3 Murray 1858 , p. 16.
  36. 1 2 Wong 1998 , pp. 226–7.
  37. Fenton 2012 , p. 140.
  38. Wong 1998 , p. 227.
  39. Wong 1998 , pp. 227–8.
  40. Engels 1857.
  41. Lowe & McLaughlin 2015 , pp. 202–3.
  42. Dunnigan 2003 , p. 341.
  43. Lowe & McLaughlin 2015 , p. 201.
  44. Lowe & McLaughlin 2015 , p. 189.
  45. 1 2 Morris 2007 , p. 52.
  46. 1 2 Cho 2017 , p. 280.
  47. Cho 2017 , p. 279.
  48. Munn 2009 , p. 284.
  49. Munn 2009, p. 257.
  50. 1 2 Munn 2009 , p. 276.
  51. Cameron 1991 , p. 83
  52. Ingham 2007 , p. 65.

Sources

Esing Bakery incident
Traditional Chinese 裕成辦館毒麵包案
Simplified Chinese 裕成办馆毒面包案
Literal meaningEsing Bakery poisoned bread case