In the practical field, given that France and the United Kingdom were the first European powers, it was a question of both securing partial control of Spain and Portugal as medium-sized countries with unstable policies, such as the government of Isabella II in Spain, in a manner closer to a protectorate. This put an end to Spain's membership of the Holy Alliance, already quite denaturalized, and it was a significant milestone that two countries traditionally at loggerheads, such as France and the United Kingdom, reached a mutual understanding.
The Quadruple Alliance guaranteed the support of France and the United Kingdom for the dynastic pretensions of the daughter of Ferdinand VII of Spain, Isabella II, against the pretender to the Crown, Carlos María Isidro de Borbón, a fact that was significant for the defeat of the latter's supporters in the First Carlist War and for the consolidation of the regime.
Context
Caricature of Pedro IV and Miguel I of Portugal disputing the crown. The development of the Portuguese civil war would be one of the main reasons for signing the Treaty of the Quadruple.
The Revolutions of 1830 marked a turning point in the system of the European concert initiated at the Congress of Vienna in 1815. As Menchén Barrios states, "the political ambitions that lead to it [the Quadruple Alliance] depend on the existing antagonisms between the liberal Europe that emerges from the revolution and the absolutist Europe".[2] The Belgian Revolution was the first example of the division into blocs, the United Kingdom and France on the one hand, Prussia, Austria and Russia on the other.[3]
The rapprochement between the United Kingdom and France was brought about by "multiple interests, and not only by ideological affinities", although these were evident.[4] In France, the revolution of 1830 gave power to Louis-Philippe, who at first adopted liberal positions. In the United Kingdom, the Whigs took over the government and imposed the Great Reform Act in 1832, which allowed for a certain political openness and a broadening of the basis of the parliamentary regime. An important point of the Whig approaches, and especially of the radicals who supported them in Parliament, was the defense of liberal ideals in Europe. This defense and union explained the rapprochement with France, which took the form of a common front against the absolutist monarchies. In any case, this collaboration had two important limitations: the traditional English principle of non-intervention and the different and conflicting economic interests of each country.[5]
As for Spain and Portugal, both countries had a very difficult internal situation. In Portugal, a war of succession had been going on since the mid-1820's. In Spain the situation was also similar, although war would not break out until after the signing of the treaty. In international politics the treaty, and the dependence it entailed, was "the result of the international isolation of the Isabelline regime".[6] López-Cordón emphasized this isolation, adding that it stemmed from the "disqualification of Spain as a European power, the result of the unfortunate foreign policy of Fernando VII".[7] An example of Spain's isolation in international politics is that only France and England recognized Isabella II as the legitimate heir at first. Her example was only followed by countries dependent on those powers.[6]
Meaning
The immediate purpose of the treaty was to achieve the expulsion of the Infantes Miguel and Carlos from Portugal, but it was understood that the commitments assumed went beyond this.[1] Without the need to explicitly state this in the treaty, England continued to maintain its influence in Portugal and unilateral Spanish action was avoided. Furthermore, the union of the constitutionalist countries (what would be called the "spirit" of the Quadruple) made the Northern Powers uneasy.[8]Javier de Burgos defined the treaty as "a kind of provocation directed at the Northern Powers" (Prussia, Austria and Russia).[9]
The negotiation of the additional articles was complicated, as it involved transforming moral support into effective support on the ground. The new articles concerned the United Kingdom, but above all France, which made specific commitments without much intention of fulfilling them quickly.[10]
The most obvious meaning for the historiography on the Quadruple Alliance is that this treaty entailed a "tutelage" of the United Kingdom and France over Spain and Portugal, something that was already reflected in the very text of the treaty. The tutelage was due to the unequal weight of the signatories due to their situation and circumstances.[11] Authors such as Vilar have come to consider that "in practice it is a treaty of Anglo-French protectorate over the two states of the Iberian Peninsula".[12]
Contracting parties
Talleyrand, the French ambassador in London, succeeded in getting France included in the treaty despite British reluctance.
The initiative for the treaty came from the United Kingdom.[14] Portugal, despite considering military support as essential, joined the treaty with little enthusiasm, seeing it as necessary and inevitable.[14] Vilar believes that even Portugal joined the treaty "in a somewhat forced way".[6] Spain, on the other hand, signed as enthusiastic, since it was seen as a diplomatic success, as the "crowning of the process of rapprochement with the United Kingdom".[9]
Moreover, the accession of France was at first viewed with reluctance by Palmerston, the British Foreign Secretary who signed the treaty, and was only achieved under pressure from Talleyrand, the French ambassador in London. The final inclusion gives a secondary role to France, dependent on the rest of the parties; it was rather a moral effect to "dispel the rumors spread by the absolutist powers about Franco-British differences".[13] For France it was a way to achieve an "institutional compromise that would support the Entente".[15] Therefore, rather than out of interest in the Portuguese and Spanish problems, France's inclusion is understood by its desire for rapprochement with Britain.[12][7]
Consequences
Two stages can be distinguished in the practical existence of the Quadruple Alliance. The first would be the immediate implementation of the commitments undertaken and the second would refer to the "spirit of the Quadruple", once the reasons that justified the treaty had been concluded.
Portuguese and Spanish civil wars
Exchange of prisoners for the Treaty of Lecera during the Carlist War. British diplomacy played a key role in the signing of this treaty, which sought to reduce the cruelty of the war.
The immediate implementation of the commitments assumed was the solution to the Portuguese problem. The Spanish question and the implementation of the additional articles would be more complicated. In general the "British support was more effective",[17] although more diplomatic than economic or military. On this last issue there are some divergences in the historiography. For Vilar the military support was minimal and based on "waste troops".[12] On the contrary, Rodríguez Alonso believes that the question should be investigated more and that one cannot minimize or speak of waste troops, summarizing the aid in "the sending of an Auxiliary Legion, with the sale of arms and supplies for the war and with the sending of ships to hinder the provisioning by sea of the Carlist troops".[18] Menchén does affirm that the "British collaboration was very valuable at some moments in spite of the economic compensations",[19] giving the example of its importance in resolving the blockade of Bilbao. The economic compensations referred to the inclusion of Spain in the British commercial system, something that did not materialize despite the fact that a commercial treaty was signed, but not ratified, in 1835.[20]
There is agreement among historians to consider as unhelpful or even negative the help of France in the Spanish matter, especially because of its scant control of the frontiers. France seemed, at times, an ally of Carlism rather than of the Elizabethan government.[19] López-Cordón goes so far as to say that it constitutes "indirectly [French aid] almost the most effective aid of the legitimist side," adding that the supposed aid was the sending of volunteers of little importance because of their low numbers and because in most cases they went over to the Carlist side.[21]
French historiography explains the ambiguity of the aid by the European context: Louis Philippe I never lost the dialogue with Austria that would ask him to "restrain" the United Kingdom. According to these interests, he thought it necessary to maintain an attitude of moderation to avoid a generalization of the conflict.[19] Throughout the development of the war, French intervention was sought in compliance with the agreement and even a change of government was made, passing to the moderate Ofalia, so that there would be greater ideological harmony. However, the intervention did not take place and this led to greater English dependence and influence for Spain.[22] As for Portuguese cooperation in the Carlist War, it took a long time to be put into practice and was of little importance. It became effective only in 1836 and the following year the troops had to return due to internal uprisings in Portugal.[16]
In addition to military aid, the United Kingdom played an important diplomatic role, especially in two areas. Firstly, in the attempt to reduce the excesses of both sides in the war, signing for this purpose two agreements, the Eliot and Segura Lécera, of "very relative effectiveness".[16] Of greater importance is the second issue: intervention in the peace agreements that took the form of the Convention of Vergara, which in its final draft essentially included the terms of the British proposal, despite the fact that it was made without foreign mediation.[21] Rodríguez Alonso shares this view, adding that the British diplomats "had played a fundamental role in the previous negotiations, but they took care that their work did not appear in the first place".[23]
The "spirit" of the Quadruple Entente
The Duke of Montpensier was one of the candidates that were considered to marry Isabella II. Although he was vetoed by the United Kingdom, he was able to marry the Infanta Luisa Fernanda, breaking the balance between the French and the English and ending the Entente between the two countries and, by extension, the Quadruple Alliance.
With the end of the war the treaty formally ceased to have effect, but neither side sought its cancellation.[21] This was called the "spirit" of the Quadruple Alliance and took the form first of all of the growing Franco-British influence in Spain. In fact, there was a struggle between the two countries, which in the long run would lead to the end of the Entente, to the understanding between France and the United Kingdom. The struggle for greater influence in Spain was fundamentally due to two issues. On the one hand, economic pretensions, but above all because the strategic control of the peninsula ensured two fundamental routes: the Atlantic to Mediterranean route controlled by the United Kingdom from Gibraltar, and the French maritime route of Marseilles-Algiers. From 1830 onwards this second route would be vital for the French because of their conquests in Algeria, which made Spain "a key player in Mediterranean politics".[25] For these reasons, any support in the peninsula was from the beginning the image of a rivalry, "any abandonment by one state was immediately exploited by another to gain advantages".[26]
The end of the Entente between the French and the British, and with it of the "spirit" of the Quadruple Alliance, was also due to the weakness it had since its formation because of the opposing economic interests that made political union impossible.[27][28] On the international level the first divergences, without causing serious problems in any case, occurred in Egypt, in 1840, when France supported Mehmet Ali in his attempt at independence from the Ottoman Empire, finally having to give in and abandon Ali.
At the Spanish level, for example, the divergences were noted in the influence of each State in the government. Thus, at the time of the fall of Espartero, it was understood that a period of French influence was opening up.[29] In Portugal the struggles between the French and the English were always of less importance, since the traditional British influence continued to be maintained. The turning point of the Entente and of the "spirit" of the Quadruple Alliance also occurred in Spain, with the issue of the royal marriages that marked the definitive "Franco-British estrangement, to the point that the Quadruple Alliance effectively ceased to exist".[30] These were the marriages of Queen Isabella II and the Infanta Luisa Fernanda. Both countries were trying to prevent the prince who married Isabella from harming their interests. Although in the end the Queen had to settle for a Spanish prince to avoid suspicions, France managed to get the Infanta to marry a Frenchman, the Duke of Montpensier, something that Narváez allowed "above all to prevent a possible British advantage from being taken advantage of by the progressives".[24] The balance was thus broken by a question of party, the moderate, not of State.
The last invocation of the Quadruple Treaty occurred during the Portuguese crisis of 1846-1847 and is the practical demonstration of the loss of its "spirit" with the Franco-British estrangement. Spanish interventionism in Portugal worried the British, who feared the influence of France, and this led to an agreement to settle the Portuguese question again jointly, under the guise of the Quadruple Treaty.[31] Spain and France thought of "plural intervention as the best way of dealing with British predominance".[32]
Historians are categorical, expressing, as Menchén does, that "after 1847 we can no longer speak of the Quadruple".[33] Moreover, the revolutionary events of 1848 changed the international panorama, especially for Spain: it would be impossible to maintain normal relations with a republican France and at last the range of relations with other powers outside the Quadruple would open up, as the absolutist courts looked favorably on Narváez's repressive action.[32][34]
Effects on Spain's international and domestic policy
It would be in Spain where the Quadruple Alliance would leave the deepest mark, extending its consequences far beyond 1847. As Vilar summarizes, it not only "contributed decisively to the consolidation of the Spanish liberal regime", but "even determined the general orientation of Spanish foreign policy throughout the reign and, to a certain extent, until 1939".[35] This general orientation can be summarized in two points. First, Spain is included in a specific system of alliances; Menchén calls it, with the significant title of his study, a "Western system" as opposed to an absolutist Eastern one. Second, it stopped taking sides between France and England and took a balanced position: "when France and the United Kingdom agree, we march with them; when they do not, Spain abstains".[30] Regarding the consolidation of the Spanish liberal regime as the fruit of the "spirit" of the Quadruple Alliance, it is worth noting the British influence which, in any case, did not support the revolutionaries, but rather the more moderate among the progressives.[36]
López-Cordón Cortezo, Mª Victoria. "La política exterior". La Era isabelina y el sexenio democrático. Historia de España Menéndez Pidal-Jover Zamora (in Spanish). Vol.XXXIV. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe. pp.819–899.
Menchén Barrios, María Teresa (1989). "La Cuádruple Alianza (1834). La Península en un sistema occidental". Cuadernos de la Escuela Diplomática (in Spanish). Vol.2. Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores, segunda época. pp.31–51.
Rodríguez Alonso, Manuel (1991). Gran Bretaña y España. Diplomacia, guerra, revolución y comercio (in Spanish). Madrid: Actas. p.259.
Vilar, Juan Bautista (2003). "España en la Europa de los nacionalismos: entre pequeña nación y potencia media (1834-1874)". Juan Carlos Pereira (coord.): La política exterior de España (1800-2003) (in Spanish). Barcelona: Ariel. pp.401–420.
Isabella II was Queen of Spain from 1833 until her deposition in 1868. She is the only queen regnant in the history of unified Spain.
DomMiguel I, nicknamed "the Absolutist", "the Traditionalist" and "the Usurper", was the King of Portugal between 1828 and 1834. He was the seventh child and third son of King John VI and Queen Carlota Joaquina.
The Concert of Europe was a general agreement among the great powers of 19th-century Europe to maintain the European balance of power, political boundaries, and spheres of influence. Never a perfect unity and subject to disputes and jockeying for position and influence, the Concert was an extended period of relative peace and stability in Europe following the Wars of the French Revolution and the Napoleonic Wars which had consumed the continent since the 1790s. There is considerable scholarly dispute over the exact nature and duration of the Concert. Some scholars argue that it fell apart nearly as soon as it began in the 1820s when the great powers disagreed over the handling of liberal revolts in Italy, while others argue that it lasted until the outbreak of World War I and others for points in between. For those arguing for a longer duration, there is generally agreement that the period after the Revolutions of 1848 and the Crimean War (1853–1856) represented a different phase with different dynamics than the earlier period.
The Holy Alliance, also called the Grand Alliance, was a coalition linking the monarchist great powers of Austria, Prussia, and Russia, which was created after the final defeat of Napoleon at the behest of Emperor (Tsar) Alexander I of Russia and signed in Paris on 26 September 1815.
The Anglo-Portuguese Alliance is the oldest alliance that is still in force by political bilateral agreement. It was established by the Treaty of Windsor in 1386, between the Kingdom of England and the Kingdom of Portugal, though the countries were previously allied via the Anglo-Portuguese Treaty of 1373.
The Triple Alliance was a defence pact signed on 4 January 1717 in The Hague between the Dutch Republic, France and Great Britain, against Bourbon Spain in an attempt to maintain the agreements of the 1713–15 Peace of Utrecht. The three states were concerned about Spain becoming a superpower in Europe. As a result, militarisation took place and caused great havoc to civilians. That enraged Spain and other states and led to brinkmanship. The alliance became the Quadruple Alliance the next year, after the accession of Holy Roman Emperor Charles VI.
The Anglo-Russian Convention of 1907, or Convention between the United Kingdom and Russia relating to Persia, Afghanistan, and Tibet, was signed on August 31, 1907, in Saint Petersburg. It ended the longstanding rivalry in Central Asia and enabled the two countries to outflank the Germans, who were threatening to connect Berlin to Baghdad with a new railroad that could potentially align the Ottoman Empire with Imperial Germany.
The First Carlist War was a civil war in Spain from 1833 to 1840, the first of three Carlist Wars. It was fought between two factions over the succession to the throne and the nature of the Spanish monarchy: the conservative and devolutionist supporters of the late king's brother, Carlos de Borbón, became known as Carlists (carlistas), while the progressive and centralist supporters of the regent, Maria Christina, acting for Isabella II of Spain, were called Liberals (liberales), cristinos or isabelinos. Aside from being a war of succession about the question who the rightful successor to king Ferdinand VII of Spain was, the Carlists’ goal was the return to a traditional monarchy, while the Liberals sought to defend the constitutional monarchy.
The military history of Spain, from the period of the Carthaginian conquests over the Phoenicians to the former Afghan War spans a period of more than 2200 years, and includes the history of battles fought in the territory of modern Spain, as well as her former and current overseas possessions and territories, and the military history of the people of Spain, regardless of geography.
Spain in the 19th century was a country in turmoil. Occupied by Napoleon from 1808 to 1814, a massively destructive "liberation war" ensued. Following the Spanish Constitution of 1812, Spain was divided between the 1812 constitution's liberal principles and the absolutism personified by the rule of Ferdinand VII, who repealed the 1812 Constitution for the first time in 1814, only to be forced to swear over the constitution again in 1820 after a liberal pronunciamiento, giving way to the brief Trienio Liberal (1820–1823).
In international relations, a rapprochement, which comes from the French word rapprocher, is a re-establishment of cordial relations between two countries. This may be done due to a mutual antagonist, as the German Empire was seen by both France and the British Empire at the time of their signing of the Entente Cordiale. It has also been done, particularly in the cold war between the Soviet Union and the United States, in an effort to reduce tensions and the likelihood of war.
The Pacte de Famille is one of three separate, but similar alliances between the Bourbon kings of France and Spain. As part of the settlement of the War of the Spanish Succession that brought the House of Bourbon of France to the throne of Spain, Spain and France made a series of agreements that did not unite the two thrones, but did lead to cooperation on a defined basis.
The history of the kingdom of Portugal and the Algarves, from the First Treaty of San Ildefonso and the beginning of the reign of Queen Maria I in 1777, to the end of the Liberal Wars in 1834, spans a complex historical period in which several important political and military events led to the end of the absolutist regime and to the installation of a constitutional monarchy in the country.
The Iberian Pact or Peninsular Pact, formally the Portuguese–Spanish Treaty of Friendship and Non-Aggression, was a non-aggression pact that was signed at Lisbon, just a few days before the end of the Spanish Civil War, on 17 March 1939 by Portuguese Prime Minister António de Oliveira Salazar, representing Portugal, and Ambassador Nicolás Franco, representing Spain. The treaty was ratified on 25 March 1939.
Between 1973 and 1993 the European Communities saw the first enlargement of the Communities. On 1 January 1973, Denmark, Ireland, and the United Kingdom became the first countries to join the Communities. The détente allowed initiation of the reunification of the continent through establishing the Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe. Greece was the next to join EC on 1 January 1981, followed by Spain and Portugal joining on 1 January 1986, while Turkey has initiated the procedure in 1987. Upon the fall of the Iron Curtain, the CSCE was transformed in 1990 into Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, the Communities enlarged for a fourth time through the German reunification, while other former communist European countries stated their firm commitment to join, prompting formulation of the Copenhagen criteria. This period was, however, also the one which witnessed the first voluntary exit from the Communities, namely the one of Greenland in 1985. The integration progressed under the Delors Commission resulting in the creation of the European Union in 1993.
Spain–United Kingdom relations, also called Spanish–British relations or Anglo-Spanish relations, are the bilateral international relations between Spain and United Kingdom. Both countries are members of the Council of Europe and NATO. Spain is a European Union member and the United Kingdom is a former European Union member.
The Franco-American alliance was the 1778 alliance between the Kingdom of France and the United States during the American Revolutionary War. Formalized in the 1778 Treaty of Alliance, it was a military pact in which the French provided many supplies for the Americans. The Netherlands and Spain later joined as allies of France; Britain had no European allies. The French alliance was possible once the Americans captured a British invasion army at Saratoga in October 1777, demonstrating the viability of the American cause. The alliance became controversial after 1793 when Great Britain and Revolutionary France again went to war and the U.S. declared itself neutral. Relations between France and the United States worsened as the latter became closer to Britain in the Jay Treaty of 1795, leading to an undeclared Quasi War. The alliance was defunct by 1794 and formally ended in 1800.
The reign of Isabella II has been seen as being essential to the modern history of Spain. Isabella's reign spanned the death of Ferdinand VII in 1833 until the Spanish Glorious Revolution of 1868, which forced the Queen into exile and established a liberal state in Spain.
The Kingdom of Spain entered a new era with the death of Charles II, the last Spanish Habsburg monarch, who died childless in 1700. The War of the Spanish Succession was fought between proponents of a Bourbon prince, Philip of Anjou, and the Austrian Habsburg claimant, Archduke Charles. After the wars were ended with the Peace of Utrecht, Philip V's rule began in 1715, although he had to renounce his place in the succession of the French throne.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
