Game summaries
Georgia Tech Techs (0–0–0) at Auburn Tigers (0–0–0)
| Period | 1 | 2 | Total |
|---|
| Georgia Tech | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Auburn | 20 | 43 | 63 |
at Drill Field • Auburn, Alabama
- Date: Saturday, October 14, 1899
- Game time: 3:00 p.m.
- Game attendance: Unknown
- Referee: Unknown
- Source: [6] [16] [17] [18]
The first game of the season for both schools was the fifth meeting in the rivalry, with Auburn winning all four previous games and averaging over 47 points per game. It was expected that the 1899 match would be close and Auburn had been a little uneasy in the lead-up to the game. [6]
However, once the game began, it was clear that Georgia Tech was entirely outclassed as Auburn scored twice in the first few minutes of the game [16] and Auburn was able to rush through Tech's line like it "was nothing but a piece of tissue paper". [17] Auburn scored 20 in the first half and 43 in the second in what was called the "Cyclonic Waterloo for the Techs" and "probably the worst defeat that any football team ever received" by one Alabama paper. [17] The Atlanta papers were more kind, stating that Georgia Tech had played well and looked like "the best team the Techs have ever sent out". It was a clean match without any injuries, but the warm weather affected the play. [6] With the 63 to 0 loss, Tech's high expectations for the season were severely humbled.
Atlanta Athletic Club Atlantans (0–0–0) at Georgia Tech Techs (0–1–0)
| Period | 1 | 2 | Total |
|---|
| Atlanta | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Georgia Tech | 0 | 0 | 0 |
at Piedmont Park • Atlanta, Georgia
- Date: Wednesday, October 18, 1899
- Game time: 4:00 p.m.
- Game attendance: Unknown
- Referee: Dickeson
- Source: [5]
Georgia Tech had already played a practice game against the Atlanta Athletic Club to a 0–0 tie on October 10. The teams had also played a match the previous season with the Atlantans winning 11–0. Admission to the game was twenty-five cents, which included a return ticket to the fair grounds at the park. The crowds were very rowdy and at times they rushed onto the field looking for fights. [19]
The game was called exciting, hard-fought, and scrappy, but no one that was played in the style of trained college players, equally poorly by both sides. Coach Nalley was also criticized for calling plays and adjustments to his team, which was considered unsportsmanlike. [5]
The ball remained in the Georgia Tech half almost the entire game with Atlanta having long runs of 25 and 30 yards. The Techs never threatened Atlanta's goal. However, Tech's defense prevented Atlanta from scoring a touchdown including one defensive stop at its 1-yard line. Sullivan, Tech's right halfback, performing outstanding tackling and defensive work. The only score of the game occurred on a first-half safety as Atlanta tackled Merritt in Tech's own endzone. The game was called after ten minutes into the second half due to darkness, with Atlanta winning by a score of 2 to 0. [5]
Sewanee Tigers (1–0–0) at Georgia Tech Techs (0–2–0)
| Period | 1 | 2 | Total |
|---|
| Sewanee | 27 | 5 | 32 |
| Georgia Tech | 0 | 0 | 0 |
at Piedmont Park • Atlanta, Georgia
- Date: Monday, October 23, 1899
- Game time: 3:00 p.m.
- Game attendance: "A small crowd"; [8] "a large crowd" [20]
- Referee: G. W. Rowbotham
- Source: [8] [20]
While in Atlanta to play (and ultimately defeat) Georgia, Sewanee made arrangements to play Georgia Tech as well and the game was scheduled two days after its Georgia match. The 1899 Sewanee team was one of the best teams of all time, finishing with a 12–0–0 record and shutting out all but one team. At one stretch of the season, Sewanee shutout five teams in six days. This was Georgia Tech's first time playing Sewanee. The teams played twenty-minute halves in weather "too warm for football". [8]
The game did not start off well for the Techs: in the first minute, Cunningham threw the snap over Merritt's head, and while he was able to recover it, his punt attempt was blocked and returned by Sewanee for a touchdown. [8] Sewanee was the better team from the beginning of the game and was able to run around the right end effectively the entire game. Tech's captain, Wooley, did manage to block a Sewanee punt on their ten-yard line, but the team could not fall onto the ball in time. For their part, Sewanee made several long runs including those by Seibles of 35, 60, and 80 yards and Tech was unable to stop the running attack. The half ended with Sewanee leading 27 to 0. [8]
In the second half, Sewanee substituted four players but continued to hold its line. Tech Coach Nalley substituted Maddox for Merritt at fullback, who played very well. Sullivan and Pete Wooley, Tech's captain, also showed great skill and effort. Overall, Tech played much better in the second half. At one point, Tech got within ten yards of Sewanee's goal but were stopped. Sewanee could only manage one touchdown in the second half and one the game 32 to 0. [20]
Georgia entered the game 1–1–0 with a win against Clemson and a loss against Sewanee. This was the fourth chapter in their rival with Georgia holding a 1–2–0 record for their three previous matches. Two twenty-five minute halves were used. The game was played under oppressively warm weather, and both teams slowed in the second half. [9]
Georgia took the opening drive in for a touchdown, setting the tone for the game. It was able to used outside runs around the right end to move the ball at ease. By the end of the first half, Georgia was already leading 22 to 0. In the second half, Tech team played much better on defense, led by the play of its fullback, Maddox, and stopped Georgia on downs twice on the five yard line. Georgia was held without an offensive touchdown in the second half, but scored twice on blocked punts. Georgia Tech's best offensive player was its right halfback, Sullivan, but the team did not threaten to score. Georgia was victorious with a score of 0–33. [21] [9]
Following the game, Georgia Tech President Lyman Hall extended support of Coach Nalley in saying that the school authorities and students are satisfied with the coach and the team: "We are confident they play their very best game, and attribute severe drubbings to the irony of fate," he said. [22]
Nashville Garnet and Blue (3–0–1) at Georgia Tech Techs (0–4–0)
| Period | 1 | 2 | Total |
|---|
| Nashville | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Georgia Tech | 0 | 0 | 0 |
at Piedmont Park • Atlanta, Georgia
- Date: Saturday, November 11, 1899
- Game time: 3:00 p.m.
- Game attendance: "A fairly large crowd of enthusiasts"
- Referee: G. W. Rowbotham
- Source: [10] [24]
This was the first meeting between the two schools. There was much excitement in the lead-up to the game as Nashville had not played in the area in the past and was a mystery to the locals. Nashville had already had a successful season, coming into the Tech game with a record of 3–1–0.
Nashville played a very fast game, which was effective against Tech's defense. Nashville scored three touchdowns in the first half. In the second half, Tech made significant adjustments and prevented any additional scoring. The Techs were able to make it five yards from Nashville's goal but were unable to score. Nashville won the game 15 to 0. [10] Clark, Maddox, Sullivan, and Wooley were the best players for Tech.
Clemson Tigers (3–2–0) vs. Georgia Tech Techs (0–5–0)
at Unknown field • Greenville, South Carolina
- Date: Thursday, December 1, 1899
- Game time: 12:24 p.m.
- Game attendance: "Good attendance"
- Referee: Unknown
- Source:
Georgia Tech's final game of the season occurred against Clemson in Greenville, South Carolina, about thirty miles from Clemson's campus. The two teams had played one previous time, in 1898, which was a Clemson victory. The 1899 contest would be the last time the rivalry was played in South Carolina until 1974. Clemson had easy success against Georgia Tech, winning by a score of 41 to 5. Georgia Tech scored on a fumbled punt on the 15-yard-line, its first and only points of the year, but it did not threaten the Clemson endzone for the remainder of the game. Overall, Tech made a good impression even with the lopsided loss and took its defeat in good humor.
