1985 Canadian federal budget

Last updated
1985 (1985) Budget of the Canadian Federal Government
Presented23 May 1985
Parliament 33rd
Party Progressive Conservative
Finance minister Michael Wilson
Total revenue77.742 billion [1]
Total expenditures111.131 billion [1]
Deficit $33.389 billion [1]
‹  1984
1986  ›

The 1985 Canadian federal budget for fiscal year 1985-1986 was presented by Minister of Finance Michael Wilson in the House of Commons of Canada on 23 May 1985. This is the first federal budget under the premiership of Brian Mulroney, and generally increased taxes. [2]

Contents

Background

The budget is the first presented in the 33rd Canadian Parliament following the 1984 federal election during which the Progressive-Conservatives won a landslide majority. The previous fiscal year (1983-84) saw, at the time, the largest post-war deficit of the federal government at 37.16 billion. [1]

Taxes

We're asking that Canadians pay 1$ more per day in taxes to make a better world

— Micheal Wilson, 1985 Budget speech

Personal income taxes

The budget brought significant changes to income taxes, notably:

Several revenue increase measures were also announced:

Corporate income taxes

A temporary 5% surtax on large corporations was announced, effective between 1 July 1985 and 30 June 1986. The surtax does not apply to income eligible to the small business deduction. [15]

Capital tax

A temporary 1% surtax on the capital tax payable by large financial institutions effective between 1 January 1986 and 31 December 1987. The surtax is calculated as 1% of capital in excess of $200 million. The surtax was deductible for corporate income taxes [16]

Other taxes

Federal Sales Tax

The Federal Sales Tax rates are increased on 1 January 1986: [17]

  • From 6 to 7% for construction goods, cable and television services;
  • From 13 to 14% for alcoholic beverages and tobacco;
  • From 10 to 11% for all other taxable goods.

The previous 1% temporary increase, slated to end on 31 December 1988, is permanently extended. [17]

The federal sales tax exemption is repealed for the following goods: [18]

  • Candy and confectionery, soft drinks ;
  • Pet food ;
  • Hygiene products (soaps, shampoos, creams...) excluding feminine hygiene and contraceptives ;
  • Surgical and dental instruments ;
  • Wood-burning stoves, heat pumps, solar heaters and similar goods.

Excise taxes

Various excise taxes were increased in the budget:

  • Tax on gasoline is increased by 0.02$ per litre starting on 3 September 1985, to avoid the increase affect the summer vacation season; [17]
  • Automatic indexation of excise taxes on alcohol and tobacco is dropped however:
    • Excise tax on alcoholic beverages is increased by 2%; [19]
    • Excise tax on tobacco is increased by 1%. [19]

Energy taxes: Western Accord implementation

The budget follows the signature of the Western Accord between the federal government and the governments of Alberta, British Columbia and Saskatchewan that was slated to enter into force on 1 June 1985. [20] The budget introduced measures to implement the Accord, notably:

  • Phased-out repeal of the Petroleum and Gas Revenue Tax (PGRT) between 1 January 1986 and 31 December 1988; [21]
  • Retroactive repeal of the Incremental Oil Revenue Tax (IORT) for production after 31 December 1984 ; [22]
  • The Canadian Ownership Special Charge (COSC) is suspended by regulation starting on 1 June 1985. The legislative measures and the Canadian Ownership Account special fund to be deleted at a later date ; [22]
  • Amendments to the Excise Tax Act to repeal the sections related to the Natural Gas and Gas Liquids Tax (NGGLT). [22]

Reactions

The budget garnered generally mixed reaction. On 24 May 1985, several newspapers' main headline focused on the tax increases:

Columnist Alain Dubuc of La Presse pointed out that the budget was disappointing in that it did not drastically reduce the federal deficit while containing few measures for job creation and several tax increases. [23] Most French-language columnists pointed out the uncertainty over the success of the measures announced in the budget. [24]

Jeffrey Simpson of The Globe and Mail painted a nuanced picture of the budget pointing overall that the return to “fiscal sanity” was long overdue. [25] L. Ian MacDonald of The Gazette expressed that the budget was a risky gamble, increasing taxes on the middle class and providing tax incentives to businesses could provide politically explosive should the recovery not materialize. [26]

The budget garnered a very positive reaction from former Quebec finance minister Jacques Parizeau. He applauded the courage of the deindexation and the repeal of the RHOSP as a way to inject $2 billion into the economy. [27]

Notes and references

Notes

  1. ↑ The exemption is phased-in at $20,000 in 1985, $50,000 in 1986, $100,000 in 1987, $200,000 in 1988, $300,000 in 1989 and finally $500,000 in 1990 and thereafter.
  2. ↑ For instance:
    • Indexed Security Investment Plans were repealed starting 1 January 1986 ;
    • Capital gains no longer qualify for the $1,000 investment deduction ;
    • Transfer of farm capital gains to RRSPs is repealed as of 24 May 1985.
  3. ↑ The credit is computer as the lesser of:
    • 20% of the cost of the shares acquired or ;
    • 40% of the cost of the share minus the benefit provided by the provincial government.
  4. ↑ They would otherwise by reincluded in the taxpayer's income if made between 22 May 1985 and 31 December 1985.
  5. ↑ The effective surtax rate in 1985 is 2.5% for income between $6,000 and $15,000 and 5% for income above that threshold.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981</span> US federal tax cut

The Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 (ERTA), or Kemp–Roth Tax Cut, was an Act that introduced a major tax cut, which was designed to encourage economic growth. The Act enacted by the 97th US Congress and signed into law by US President Ronald Reagan. The Accelerated Cost Recovery System (ACRS) was a major component of the Act and was amended in 1986 to become the Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Taxation in the United Kingdom</span>

Taxation in the United Kingdom may involve payments to at least three different levels of government: central government, devolved governments and local government. Central government revenues come primarily from income tax, National Insurance contributions, value added tax, corporation tax and fuel duty. Local government revenues come primarily from grants from central government funds, business rates in England, Council Tax and increasingly from fees and charges such as those for on-street parking. In the fiscal year 2014–15, total government revenue was forecast to be £648 billion, or 37.7 per cent of GDP, with net taxes and National Insurance contributions standing at £606 billion.

The Canada Child Benefit (CCB), previously the Canada Child Tax Benefit (CCTB), is an income-tested income support program for Canadian families. It is delivered as a tax-free monthly payment available to eligible Canadian families to help with the cost of raising children. The CCTB could incorporate the National Child Benefit (NCB), a monthly benefit for low-income families with children, and the Child Disability Benefit (CDB), a monthly benefit for families caring for children with severe and prolonged mental or physical disabilities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Finance Act</span> Fiscal legislation enacted by the UK Parliament

A Finance Act is the headline fiscal (budgetary) legislation enacted by the UK Parliament, containing multiple provisions as to taxes, duties, exemptions and reliefs at least once per year, and in particular setting out the principal tax rates for each fiscal year.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990</span> US federal law

The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 is a United States statute enacted pursuant to the budget reconciliation process to reduce the United States federal budget deficit. The Act included the Budget Enforcement Act of 1990 which established the "pay-as-you-go" or "PAYGO" process for discretionary spending and taxes.

The United States Revenue Act of 1942, Pub. L. 753, Ch. 619, 56 Stat. 798, increased individual income tax rates, increased corporate tax rates, and reduced the personal exemption amount from $1,500 to $1,200. The exemption amount for each dependent was reduced from $400 to $350.

The Revenue Act of 1940 permanently increased individual income tax rates in the United States, permanently increased corporate tax rates from 19% to 33% and temporarily increased most excise tax rates to 30-50%. The personal exemption fell from $2,500 to $2,000.

The Revenue Act of 1941 permanently extended the temporary individual, corporate, and excise tax increases of 1940, increased the excess profits tax by 10 percentage points and increased corporate tax rates 6-7 percentage points.

The United States Revenue Act of 1921 was the first Republican tax reduction following their landslide victory in the 1920 federal elections. New Secretary of the Treasury Andrew Mellon argued that significant tax reduction was necessary in order to spur economic expansion and restore prosperity.

The federal telephone excise tax is a statutory federal excise tax imposed under the Internal Revenue Code in the United States under 26 U.S.C. § 4251 on amounts paid for certain "communications services". The tax was to be imposed on the person paying for the communications services but, under 26 U.S.C. § 4291, is collected from the customer by the "person receiving any payment for facilities or services" on which the tax is imposed.

The 2009 Union budget of India was presented by the finance minister, Pranab Mukherjee, on 6 July 2009.

The alternative minimum tax (AMT) is a tax imposed by the United States federal government in addition to the regular income tax for certain individuals, estates, and trusts. As of tax year 2018, the AMT raises about $5.2 billion, or 0.4% of all federal income tax revenue, affecting 0.1% of taxpayers, mostly in the upper income ranges.

The Established Programs Financing (EPF) was a financing program created by the Trudeau government in 1977, to finance the provincially-run healthcare and high-education system, through transfer payments, by cash and tax points.

The 2013 Ontario budget, known as the Prosperous and Fair Ontario Act, is the budget for the province of Ontario for fiscal year 2013. It was presented to the Legislative Assembly of Ontario for its first reading on 2 May 2013 by Charles Sousa, the Minister of Finance of the Government of Ontario, and received Royal Assent on 13 June 2013.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1989 Canadian federal budget</span>

The Canadian federal budget for fiscal year 1989–1990 was presented to the House of Commons of Canada by finance minister Michael Wilson on 27 April 1989. It was the first budget after the 1988 Canadian federal election.

The Canadian federal budget for fiscal year 1988–1989 was presented to the House of Commons of Canada by finance minister Michael Wilson on 10 February 1988. It was the fourth budget after the 1984 Canadian federal election and would be the last before the 1988 Canadian federal election.

The 1992 Canadian budget was a Canadian federal budget for the Government of Canada presented by Minister of Finance Don Mazankowski in the House of Commons of Canada on 25 February 1992. It was the fourth budget after the 1988 Canadian federal election. It is the first budget presented by Don Mazankowski.

The 1979 Canadian federal budget was presented by Minister of Finance John Crosbie in the House of Commons of Canada on 11 December 1979. It was the first and only Canadian federal budget presented under the premiership of Joe Clark. The budget was never adopted, as the government was defeated in a vote of confidence on a budget subamendment on December 13, 1979.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1991 Canadian federal budget</span>

The Canadian federal budget for fiscal year 1991-1992 was presented by Minister of Finance Michael Wilson in the House of Commons of Canada on 26 February 1991.

The Canadian federal budget for fiscal year 1976-1977 was presented by Minister of Finance Donald Stovel Macdonald in the House of Commons of Canada on 25 May 1976.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 "Canada's deficits and surpluses, 1963-2014". CBC News. CBC/Radio-Canada. Retrieved 25 April 2015.
  2. ↑ "The Leader-Post". news.google.com. 24 May 1985. Archived from the original on 2020-06-26. Retrieved 2020-06-17.
  3. ↑ Budget Papers, p. 3.
  4. ↑ Budget Papers, p. 5-6.
  5. ↑ S.C. 1986, ch. 6, s 73.
  6. 1 2 Budget Papers, p. 8.
  7. ↑ S.C. 1986, ch. 6, s 73(2).
  8. ↑ S.C. 1986, ch. 6, s 73(4).
  9. ↑ S.C. 1986, ch. 6, s 82(10).
  10. ↑ Budget Papers, p. 76, 77.
  11. ↑ S.C. 1986, ch. 6, s 82.
  12. ↑ Fellows, Patrick (8 July 1986). "Savings bonds are always cashable". Toronto Star. p. E4.
  13. ↑ Budget Papers, p. 73.
  14. ↑ Budget Papers, p. 73-75.
  15. ↑ Budget Papers, p. 75.
  16. ↑ Budget Papers, p. 75,76.
  17. 1 2 3 Budget Papers, p. 79.
  18. ↑ Budget Papers, p. 78.
  19. 1 2 Budget Papers, p. 77.
  20. ↑ Budget Papers, p. 12.
  21. ↑ Budget Papers, p. 12-14.
  22. 1 2 3 Budget Papers, p. 14.
  23. ↑ Dubuc, Alain (24 May 1985). "Le ministre des Finances coupe et frappe" (in French). p. A1-A2.
  24. ↑ Yorston, John (31 May 1985). "Wilson budget remains a big question mark". The Gazette. Montreal. p. B3.
  25. ↑ Simpson, Jeffrey (24 May 1985). "Toward fiscal sanity". The Globe and Mail. p. A6.
  26. ↑ MacDonald, L. Ian (24 May 1985). "Tory budget is enormous gamble". The Gazette. Montreal. p. B3.
  27. ↑ Toomey, Craig (19 June 1985). "Parizeau backs Wilson on budget says Canada can't afford indexing". The Gazette. Montreal. p. G1.

Budget documents

Enacted legislations

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.