1995 Australian Capital Territory electoral system referendum

Last updated

1995 Australian Capital Territory
electoral system referendum
Flag of the Australian Capital Territory.svg
18 February 1995

Write YES or NO in the box below to show whether you approve the law to entrench the principles of the proprtional representation (Hare–Clark) electoral system: Do you approve the entrenching law? [1]
Results
Choice
Votes %
Check-71-128-204-brightblue.svgYes109,66665.01%
Light brown x.svgNo59,01734.99%
Valid votes168,68395.91%
Invalid or blank votes7,1904.09%
Total votes175,873100.00%
Registered voters/turnout175,873100%

The 1995 Australian Capital Territory electoral system referendum was a referendum held on 18 February 1995, asking voters in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) whether to entrench their current electoral system. The referendum took place alongside the 1995 ACT election. [2]

Contents

At a referendum in 1992, voters were asked to choose between the proportional Hare–Clark system or single-member electorates (using preferential voting). [3] By a comfortable margin, voters chose Hare–Clark, which came into effect for the 1995 election. [4]

The 1995 referendum asked voters whether they approved entrenching the principles of Hare–Clark. [5] The "Yes" vote received 65% of the vote and the referendum was passed. [5]

Background

On 8 December 1994, the Proportional Representation (Hare–Clark) Entrenchment Bill was passed by the ACT Legislative Assembly. [6] If passed by voters at the 1995 referendum, it would entrench the principles of Hare–Clark − meaning that elements of the system would only be able to be changed if a majority of voters supported a change at a future referendum, or if a two-thirds majority in the Legislative Assembly voted in favour of a change. [5]

Result

With 65% of the "Yes" vote (just 0.3% less than what Hare–Clark received in 1992), the referendum was passed. [5]

For a referendum to pass, it needed 50% of support of enrolled voters, which meant that informal votes and non-voters essentially counted as votes against, meaning around 58% of formal votes were usually needed for a proposal to pass. [7] The result was assured on 19 February 1995 when the 97,695th vote for Hare–Clark was counted. [7]

The referendum, like the election, was conducted by Elections ACT. [1]

Result by electorate

Electorate Enrolled
voters
YESNOInformalTurnout
Votes %Votes %Votes %Total %
Brindabella 58,32730,33060.8919,48539.112,2504.3252,06589.26
Ginninderra 56,74930,91664.1717,25935.832,0774.1350,25288.55
Molonglo 81,88348,42068.4922,27331.512,8633.8973,55689.83
Total196,959109,66665.0159,01734.997,1904.09175,87389.29

Endorsements

Yes campaign

Political parties

Individuals

Organisations

No campaign

Political parties

Opinion polling

Voting intention

DateFirmInterview
mode
Sample
size
Voting intention
YESNODK
18 February 1992 1995 referendum 175,87365%35%
28 January−7 February 1995 Canberra Times /Datacol [8] [14] [15] Telephone91658%26%17%

Results by party affiliation

DateFirmInterview
mode
Sample
size
Labor Liberal Others
YNDKYNDKYNDK
28 January−7 February 1995 Canberra Times /Datacol [14] Telephone91656%23%21%64%24%12%61%23%16%

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Single transferable vote</span> Multi-winner electoral system

The single transferable vote (STV) or proportional-ranked choice voting (P-RCV), is a multi-winner electoral system in which each voter casts a single vote in the form of a ranked ballot. Voters have the option to rank candidates, and their vote may be transferred according to alternative preferences if their preferred candidate is eliminated or elected with surplus votes, so that their vote is used to elect someone they prefer over others in the running. STV aims to approach proportional representation based on votes cast in the district where it is used, so that each vote is worth about the same as another.

National referendums are seldom used in Canada. The first two referendums in 1898 and 1942 saw voters in Quebec and the remainder of Canada take dramatically-opposing stands, and the third in 1992 saw most of the voters take a stand dramatically opposed to that of the politicians in power.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electoral reform in New Zealand</span>

Electoral reform in New Zealand has been a political issue in the past as major changes have been made to both parliamentary and local government electoral systems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electoral Reform Society</span> British advocacy group for electoral reform

The Electoral Reform Society (ERS) is an independent advocacy organisation in the United Kingdom which promotes electoral reform. It seeks to replace first-past-the-post voting with proportional representation, advocating the single transferable vote, and an elected upper house of Parliament. It is the world's oldest still-extant electoral reform campaign.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Australian Capital Territory Legislative Assembly</span> Unicameral legislature of the Australian Capital Territory

The Legislative Assembly for the Australian Capital Territory is the unicameral legislature of the Australian Capital Territory (ACT). It sits in the Legislative Assembly Building on Civic Square, close to the centre of the city of Canberra.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elections in Romania</span>

Romania elects on a national level a head of state – the president – and a legislature. The president is elected for a five-year term by the people. The Romanian Parliament has two chambers. The Chamber of Deputies has currently 330 members, elected for a four-year term by party-list proportional representation on closed lists. The Senate has currently 136 members, elected for a four-year term by party-list proportional representation on closed lists.

Historically, the single transferable vote (STV) electoral system has seen a series of relatively modest periods of usage and disusage throughout the world; however, today it is seeing increasing popularity and proposed implementation as a method of proportional representation and a goal of electoral reform. STV has been used in many different local, regional and national electoral systems, as well as in various other types of bodies, around the world.

Instant-runoff voting (IRV) is a ranked voting method used in single-winner elections. IRV is also known outside the US as the alternative vote (AV). Today it is in use at a national level to elect the Australian House of Representatives, the National Parliament of Papua New Guinea, the President of Ireland and President of India. In Australia it is also used for elections to the legislative assemblies of all states and territories except Tasmania and the Australian Capital Territory, and for the Tasmanian Legislative Council.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1992 Australian Capital Territory general election</span>

Elections to the 1992 Australian Capital Territory Legislative Assembly was held on Saturday, 15 February, alongside a referendum on an electoral system for future elections. The incumbent Labor Party, led by Rosemary Follett, was challenged by the Liberal Party, led by Trevor Kaine. Candidates were elected to fill seats using the modified d'Hondt electoral system for a multi-member single constituency. The result was another hung parliament. However, Labor, with the largest representation in the 17-member unicameral Assembly, formed Government with the support of Michael Moore and Helen Szuty. Follett was elected Chief Minister at the first sitting of the second Assembly on 27 March 1992.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1995 Australian Capital Territory general election</span>

The 1995 Australian Capital Territory general election was held on 18 February 1995 to elect all 17 members of the Australian Capital Territory Legislative Assembly. A referendum on entrenching the ACT's electoral system was also held alongside the election.

A referendum was held in the Canadian province of Prince Edward Island on November 28, 2005, to determine whether to adopt the Mixed Member Proportional (MMP) system as recommended by the Prince Edward Island Electoral Reform Commission in 2003.

The 2011 New Zealand voting system referendum was a referendum on whether to keep the existing mixed member proportional (MMP) voting system, or to change to another voting system, for electing Members of Parliament to New Zealand's House of Representatives. It was held on 26 November 2011 in conjunction with the 2011 general election.

Electoral reform is a change in electoral systems which alters how public desires are expressed in election results.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2011 United Kingdom Alternative Vote referendum</span> 2011 referendum in the UK on reforming the voting system

The United Kingdom Alternative Vote referendum, also known as the UK-wide referendum on the Parliamentary voting system was held on Thursday 5 May 2011 in the United Kingdom to choose the method of electing MPs at subsequent general elections. It occurred as a provision of the Conservative–Liberal Democrat coalition agreement drawn up in 2010 and also indirectly in the aftermath of the 2009 expenses scandal. It operated under the provisions of the Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Act 2011 and was the first national referendum to be held under provisions laid out in the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. Many local elections were also held on this day.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2016 Australian Capital Territory general election</span>

A general election for the Australian Capital Territory Legislative Assembly was held on Saturday, 15 October 2016.

The 1992 Australian Capital Territory electoral system referendum was a referendum held on 15 February 1992, asking voters in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) to choose their electoral system. The referendum took place alongside the 1992 ACT election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hare–Clark electoral system</span> Proportional-representation voting system

Hare–Clark is a type of single transferable vote electoral system of proportional representation used for elections in Tasmania and the Australian Capital Territory. It was one of the first uses of the Gregory method for transfers of winner's surplus votes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2018 British Columbia electoral reform referendum</span> Referendum on British Columbias voting system

A referendum on electoral reform took place by mail-in ballot between October 22 and December 7, 2018, in the Canadian province of British Columbia. 61.3 percent of voters supported maintaining the first-past-the-post voting system rather than switching to a proportional representation voting system, which was supported by 38.7 percent of voters. This was British Columbia's third referendum on electoral reform, following ones in 2005 and 2009.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2019 Prince Edward Island electoral reform referendum</span> Canadian provincial referendum

A referendum on electoral reform was held on April 23, 2019, in the Canadian province of Prince Edward Island – simultaneously with the 2019 provincial election – to determine if the province should adopt a mixed-member proportional representation voting system (MMP). A narrow majority voted to keep the existing first-past-the-post system. However, the referendum was not binding, as neither the yes or no side received majority support in 60% or more of the province's 27 electoral districts.

References

  1. 1 2 "A referendum to entrench the ACT's proportional representation (Hare-Clark) electoral system" (PDF). Elections ACT. Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 July 2024. Retrieved 27 October 2024.
  2. "Voting referendum". The Canberra Times. 18 February 1995. p. 22. Retrieved 27 October 2024.
  3. "1992 Referendum". Elections ACT. 9 July 2024. Archived from the original on 11 July 2024. Retrieved 24 October 2024.
  4. Lamberton, Hugh (16 February 1992). "Resounding 'yes' for Hare-Clark". The Canberra Times. p. 1. Retrieved 24 October 2024.
  5. 1 2 3 4 "1995 Referendum". Elections ACT. 9 July 2024. Archived from the original on 7 October 2024. Retrieved 27 October 2024.
  6. "Proportional Representation (Hare-Clark) Entrenchment Bill 1994" (PDF). ACT Parliament. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 April 2024. Retrieved 27 October 2024.
  7. 1 2 Hull, Crispin (20 February 1995). "Yes for Hare-Clark". The Canberra Times. p. 4. Retrieved 24 October 2024.
  8. 1 2 3 4 "Yes vote ahead in poll". The Canberra Times. 11 February 1995. p. 3.
  9. "Hare-Clark the best: Mack". The Canberra Times. 10 February 1995. p. 7. Retrieved 27 October 2024.
  10. "People have their say". The Canberra Times. 17 February 1995. p. 7. Retrieved 27 October 2024.
  11. Bachelard, Michael (14 February 1995). "Leading Green lends support to 'yes' vote". The Canberra Times. p. 4. Retrieved 27 October 2024.
  12. Stevenson, Dennis (19 January 1995). "Referendum 'No' case". The Canberra Times. p. 12. Retrieved 27 October 2024.
  13. "Benefits politicians". The Canberra Times. 17 February 1995. p. 7. Retrieved 27 October 2024.
  14. 1 2 "Labor ahead in Ros Kelly's former seat". The Canberra Times. 11 February 1995. p. 3.
  15. "ABOUT THE POLL". The Canberra Times. 11 February 1995. p. 3.