2010 Oklahoma State Question 755

Last updated
State Question 755
Save Our State Amendment
Votes %
Light brown x.svgNo296,94429.92%
Total votes992,594100.00%

2010 Oklahoma State Question 755 results map by county.svg

State Question 755, also known as the Save Our State Amendment, was a legislatively-referred ballot measure held on November 2, 2010, alongside the 2010 Oklahoma elections. The ballot measure, which passed with over 70% of the vote, added bans on Sharia law and international law to the Oklahoma state constitution. However, the amended language never went into effect; a challenge in federal court successfully argued that it violated the First Amendment to the United States federal constitution.



The amendment was introduced as House Joint Resolution 1056. State Representative Rex Duncan was the primary author of the amendment, with Mike Reynolds, Ann Coody, Sue Tibbs, David Derby, Sally Kern, Randy Terrill, John Enns, Mike Christian, George Faught, Lewis H. Moore, and Charles Key as coauthors in the House, with Anthony Sykes and Randy Brogdon as coauthors in the Oklahoma Senate. [1] According to Duncan, Oklahoma would be the first state to enact a Sharia law ban, which would be a "pre-emptive strike against Sharia law". [2]

The amendment was part of a nationwide movement against Sharia law, following a case in New Jersey when a woman was denied a restraining order against her husband after she alleged that he raped her; her husband argued that he was acting in accordance with his religious beliefs in forcing her to have sex. [3] [4] This case, though later overturned, was cited by Patrick R. Wyrick, Oklahoma's solicitor general, as part of his attempt to defend the amendment in court. [3]


The original ballot title for the question, as suggested by the legislature, did not explain what Sharia law or international law were; Oklahoma attorney general Drew Edmondson replaced it with a more explanatory ballot title. [2] [1]

The proposal was listed on ballots as follows: [1]

This measure amends the State Constitution. It changes a section that deals with the courts of this state. It would amend Article 7, Section 1. It makes courts rely on federal and state law when deciding cases. It forbids courts from considering or using international law. It forbids courts from considering or using Sharia Law. International law is also known as the law of nations. It deals with the conduct of international organizations and independent nations, such as countries, states and tribes. It deals with their relationship with each other. It also deals with some of their relationships with persons.

The law of nations is formed by the general assent of civilized nations. Sources of international law also include international agreements, as well as treaties.

Sharia Law is Islamic law. It is based on two principal sources, the Koran and the teaching of Mohammed.

Support and opposition

The amendment was supported by most legislators, with only ten in the House and two in the Senate voting against the measure. [5] ACT for America, led by activist Brigitte Gabriel, strongly supported the measure, with Gabriel visiting the state to make multiple speeches in favor of the amendment. [6] The Tulsa Beacon , a conservative newspaper, endorsed the measure. [7]

Democratic state representative Cory Williams, one of the opponents of the measure, argued that it was unnecessary and singled out Muslims. [8] Chris White, the executive director of governmental affairs of the Osage Nation, expressed concerns that the measure could undermine treaty rights established in U.S.–Native American treaties. [8] Islamic groups also opposed the measure, with Saad Mohammed, the director of information for the Islamic Society of Greater Oklahoma City, arguing that the measure was unnecessary and only targeted Muslims without a good reason. [5]

Many newspapers in the state opposed the measure. The Oklahoman opposed the amendment, describing it as an unnecessary "feel-good measure". [9] The Enid News & Eagle similarly opposed it, noting that state and federal law is already the only law used in Oklahoma. [10] Tulsa World described the measure as bigoted, [11] and The Oklahoma Daily described it as Islamophobic. [12]


Poll sourceDate(s)
size [lower-alpha 1]
of error
Question 755
Question 755
Don't know/refused [lower-alpha 2] Lead
SoonerPoll October 18–23, 2010753 (LV)± 3.57%57%24%19%33%
SoonerPoll October 3–7, 2010352 (LV)± 5.2%45%25%30%20%
SoonerPoll July 16–21, 2010755 (LV)± 3.57%49%24%27%25%
  1. Key:
    A – all adults
    RV – registered voters
    LV – likely voters
    V – unclear
  2. Some polling results do not add up to 100% due to rounding.


The amendment was approved by 70% of voters. Support was high across the state, with more than 60% of voters supporting it in every county. [13]

Question 755 [13]
ChoiceVotes %
Check-71-128-204-brightblue.svg Yes695,65070.08
Total votes992,594100.00


Despite passing by a wide margin, the amendment never took effect. Muneer Awad, a local leader of the Council on American–Islamic Relations, [4] sued to stop the amendment from being enacted. He said that he wanted his estate to be dealt with under Islamic law, and that a ban on Islamic law would therefore violate his rights under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. [14] The case, Awad v. Ziriax, was filed against the Oklahoma State Election Board, which was responsible for certifying the results of the amendment. [4] Awad was supported in his lawsuit by the American Civil Liberties Union. [3]

A preliminary injunction against the ban was issued by Vicki Miles-LaGrange, a judge for the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, on November 29, 2010. [15] The injunction was appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, where it was upheld on January 10, 2012. [4] The amendment was struck down in its entirety by Miles-LaGrange on August 15, 2013, with her finding that the law clearly violated the First Amendment. Oklahoma officials argued that only the Sharia prohibition in the law could be struck down, while leaving the rest intact, but Miles-LaGrange found that as most campaigning regarding the amendment focused on Sharia law, there was insufficient evidence that it would have been approved by voters without the Sharia prohibitions. [16]

Following initial legal challenges to the amendment, Sally Kern, a Republican member of the Oklahoma House, introduced HB 1552 in 2011. The bill intended to work around legal challenges by banning all religious and foreign law from being used in the state. The Oklahoma Council on American–Islamic Relations lobbied against this bill, arguing that it infringes on religious freedom and also threatens the validity of international business contracts. [17] The measure passed by a 76–3 margin in the House, but was ignored in the Senate. [18] She reintroduced the bill in 2012, where it again passed the House, but was rejected 6–9 in the Senate's rules committee. [19]

Related Research Articles

In the politics of the United States, the process of initiatives and referendums allow citizens of many U.S. states to place legislation on the ballot for a referendum or popular vote, either enacting new legislation, or voting down existing legislation. Citizens, or an organization, might start an initiative to gather a predetermined number of signatures to qualify the measure for the ballot. The measure is placed on the ballot for the referendum, or actual vote.

First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti, 435 U.S. 765 (1978), is a U.S. constitutional law case which defined the free speech right of corporations for the first time. The United States Supreme Court held that corporations have a First Amendment right to make contributions to ballot initiative campaigns. The ruling came in response to a Massachusetts law that prohibited corporate donations in ballot initiatives unless the corporation's interests were directly involved.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">U.S. state constitutional amendments banning same-sex unions</span>

Prior to the Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell v. Hodges (2015), U.S. state constitutional amendments banning same-sex unions of several different types passed, banning legal recognition of same-sex unions in U.S. state constitutions, referred to by proponents as "defense of marriage amendments" or "marriage protection amendments." These state amendments are different from the proposed Federal Marriage Amendment, which would ban same-sex marriage in every U.S. state, and Section 2 of the Defense of Marriage Act, more commonly known as DOMA, which allowed the states not to recognize same-sex marriages from other states. The amendments define marriage as a union between one man and one woman and prevent civil unions or same-sex marriages from being legalized, though some of the amendments bar only the latter. The Obergefell decision in June 2015 invalidated these state constitutional amendments insofar as they prevented same-sex couples from marrying, even though the actual text of these amendments remain written into the state constitutions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mary Fallin</span> American politician (born 1954)

Mary Fallin is an American politician who served as the 27th governor of Oklahoma from 2011 to 2019. A member of the Republican Party, she was elected in 2010 and reelected in 2014. She is the first and so far only woman to be elected governor of Oklahoma. She was the first woman to represent Oklahoma in Congress since Alice Mary Robertson left office in 1923.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2006 Colorado Amendment 41</span>

Amendment 41 is a citizen initiative adopted by Colorado voters in the 2006 general election. Amendment 41 has three main sections.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1998 Alaska Measure 2</span> 1998 referendum

Ballot Measure 2 of 1998 is a ballot measure, since ruled unconstitutional, that added an amendment to the Alaska Constitution that prohibited the recognition of same-sex marriage in Alaska. The Ballot measure was sparked by the lawsuit filed by Jay Brause and Gene Dugan, after the two men were denied a marriage license by the Alaska Bureau of Vital Statistics. In Brause v. Bureau of Vital Statistics, 1998 WL 88743, the Alaska Superior Court ruled that the state needed compelling reason to deny marriage licenses to same-sex couples and ordered a trial on the question. In response, the Alaska Legislature immediately proposed and passed Resolution 42, which became what is now known as Ballot Measure 2. Ballot Measure 2 passed via public referendum on November 3, 1998, with 68% of voters supporting and 32% opposing. The Bause case was dismissed following the passage of the ballot measure.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2004 Oklahoma State Question 711</span> Amendment to the Oklahoma Constitution

Oklahoma Question 711 of 2004, was an amendment to the Oklahoma Constitution that defined marriage as the union of a man and a woman, thus rendering recognition or performance of same-sex marriages or civil unions null within the state prior to its being ruled unconstitutional. The referendum was approved by 76 percent of the voters.

<i>Yes on Term Limits v. Savage</i> U.S. legal case

Yes on Term Limits v. Savage, 550 F.3d 1023, is a case in which challenged Oklahoma's residency requirements for petition circulators. In 2007, the organization Oklahoma Yes on Term Limits filed a federal lawsuit against Oklahoma Secretary of State Susan Savage on First Amendment grounds. At the time, Oklahoma required petition circulators to be a state resident which it argued was "narrowly tailored" to uphold the integrity of the petitioning process in the state.

Same-sex marriage has been legally recognized in Nevada since October 9, 2014, when a federal district court judge issued an injunction against Nevada's enforcement of its same-sex marriage ban, acting on order from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. A unanimous three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit had ruled two days earlier that the state's ban on same-sex marriage was unconstitutional. Same-sex marriage was previously banned by an amendment to the Constitution of Nevada adopted in 2002. The statutory and constitutional bans were repealed in 2017 and 2020, respectively.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2009 Washington Referendum 71</span> LGBT rights referendum

The 2009 Washington Referendum 71 (R-71) legalized domestic partnership in Washington state, the first statewide referendum in the United States that extended to LGBT people the rights and responsibility of domestic partnership. The bill had passed State Legislature, and it was signed into law by the Governor in May 2009, but opponents gathered enough signatures to put the measure before the voters, who returned ballots by mail over three weeks ending on November 3, 2009, approving the measure 53% to 47%. The new law went into effect 30 days later, on December 3, 2009.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abortion law in the United States by state</span> Termination of pregnancy in states of the United States

The legality of abortion in the United States and the various restrictions imposed on the procedure vary significantly depending on the laws of each state or other jurisdiction. Some states prohibit abortion at all stages of pregnancy with few exceptions, others permit it up to a certain point in a woman's pregnancy, while others allow abortion throughout a woman's pregnancy. In states where abortion is legal, several classes of restrictions on the procedure may exist, such as parental consent or notification laws, requirements that patients be shown an ultrasound before obtaining an abortion, mandatory waiting periods, and counseling requirements.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2010 Oklahoma elections</span>

The 2010 Oklahoma elections were held on November 2, 2010. The primary election was held on July 27. The runoff primary election was held August 24.

A ban on sharia law is legislation that prohibits the application or implementation of Islamic law (Sharia) in courts in any civil (non-religious) jurisdiction. In the United States for example, various states have "banned Sharia law," or a ballot measure was passed that "prohibits the state’s courts from considering foreign, international or religious law." As of 2014 these include Alabama, Arizona, Kansas, Louisiana, North Carolina, South Dakota and Tennessee. In the Canadian province of Ontario, family law disputes are arbitrated only under Ontario law.

Same-sex marriage has been legal in Oklahoma since October 6, 2014, following the resolution of a lawsuit challenging the state's ban on same-sex marriage. On that day, following the U.S. Supreme Court's refusal to review Bishop v. Smith, a case that had found the ban unconstitutional, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals ordered Oklahoma to recognize same-sex marriages. On January 14, 2014, Judge Terence C. Kern of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma declared the state's statutory and constitutional same-sex marriage bans unconstitutional. The case, Bishop v. Smith, was stayed pending appeal. On July 18, 2014, a panel of the Tenth Circuit upheld Kern's ruling overturning Oklahoma's same-sex marriage ban. However, the panel put its ruling on hold pending disposition of a petition for certiorari by the U.S. Supreme Court. On October 6, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected the request for review, leaving the Tenth Circuit Court's ruling in place. State officials responded by implementing the Tenth Circuit's ruling, recognizing same-sex marriage in the state.

Muneer Awad is an American political activist and attorney. He is the former executive director of the Oklahoma and New York City chapters of the Council on American-Islamic Relations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Medicaid coverage gap</span>

In the context of public healthcare policy of the United States, the Medicaid coverage gap refers to uninsured people who do not qualify for marketplace assistance under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and reside in states that have not adopted Medicaid expansion under the ACA. People within this categorization have incomes above the eligibility limits for Medicaid set by their state of residence but fall below the federal poverty line (FPL), resulting in deficient access to affordable health insurance. As of March 2023, an estimated 1.9 million Americans in 10 states are within the Medicaid coverage gap according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. Approximately 97 percent of this cohort lives in the Southern U.S., with a majority living in Texas and Florida; Texas has the largest population of people in the cohort, accounting for 41 percent of people in the coverage gap.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2016 Massachusetts Question 3</span> 2016 referendum

An Act to Prevent Cruelty to Farm Animals, more commonly known as Question 3, was the third initiative on the 2016 Massachusetts ballot. The measure requires Massachusetts farmers to give chickens, pigs, and calves enough room to turn around, stand up, lie down, and fully extend their limbs. It also prohibits the sale of eggs or meat from animals raised in conditions that did not meet these standards.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2016 California Proposition 63</span> 2016 California ballot proposition

The 2016 Proposition 63, titled Firearms and Ammunition Sales, is a California ballot proposition that passed on the November 8, 2016 ballot. It requires a background check and California Department of Justice authorization to purchase ammunition, prohibits possession of high-capacity ammunition magazines over ten rounds, levies fines for failing to report when guns are stolen or lost, establishes procedures for enforcing laws prohibiting firearm possession by specified persons, and requires California Department of Justice's participation in the federal National Instant Criminal Background Check System.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 Oklahoma State Question 802</span>

Oklahoma Question 802, the Oklahoma Medicaid Expansion Initiative, was a 2020 ballot measure on the June 30 ballot to expand Medicaid in the state of Oklahoma. It passed narrowly, over the objections of many prominent state elected officials, such as Oklahoma's governor Kevin Stitt. Medicaid expansion went into effect on July 1, 2021.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2023 Oklahoma State Question 820</span> Marijuana ballot measure

Oklahoma State Question 820 was a voter initiative to legalize adult purchasing, possession and consumption of cannabis in the U.S. state of Oklahoma. It would have placed Oklahoma Medical Marijuana Authority in charge of business regulation. It appeared on the March 7, 2023 in a special election to consider this single State Question. Governor Kevin Stitt, who opposed the measure, set the special election in a successful attempt to limit voter turnout.


  1. 1 2 3 "State Question Number 755 – Legislative Referendum Number 335" (PDF). Oklahoma Secretary of State .
  2. 1 2 Schlachtenhaufen, Mark (June 4, 2010). "Sharia law, courts likely on 2010 ballot". Norman Transcript . Retrieved April 13, 2024.
  3. 1 2 3 Banda, P. Solomon (September 12, 2011). "Denver Appellate Court To Hear Islamic Law Case – CBS Colorado". CBS News . Associated Press . Retrieved April 23, 2024.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Mears, Bill (January 10, 2012). "Federal court blocks Oklahoma ban on Sharia". CNN . Retrieved April 23, 2024.
  5. 1 2 Brown, Trevor (September 23, 2010). "Islamic Sharia law ban raises questions, concerns". The Norman Transcript . Retrieved April 23, 2024.
  6. Weigel, David (April 4, 2011). "Sharia, USA". Slate . Retrieved April 23, 2024.
  7. "Tulsa Beacon voting endorsements for the Nov. 2 Election". Tulsa Beacon . October 28, 2010. Archived from the original on October 31, 2010. Retrieved April 23, 2024.
  8. 1 2 Toensing, Gale Courey (September 13, 2018). "Oklahoma lawmakers aim to ban international and Sharia law from state courts". ICT News . Retrieved April 23, 2024.
  9. "Our SQ choices". The Oklahoman . October 18, 2010. Retrieved April 23, 2024.
  10. "Our take on the state questions". Enid News & Eagle . October 18, 2010. Retrieved April 23, 2024.
  11. "State questions". October 24, 2010. Archived from the original on October 31, 2010. Retrieved April 23, 2024.
  12. "OUR VIEW: State Questions 754, 755". October 27, 2010. Archived from the original on September 20, 2011. Retrieved April 23, 2024.
  13. 1 2 "Election Night Results by County for 10/02/2010" (PDF). Oklahoma Secretary of State . pp. 138–139.
  14. Hagerty, Barbara Bradley (January 10, 2012). "Court Strikes Down Oklahoma Shariah Ban" . Retrieved April 23, 2024.
  15. Mears, Bill. "Judge issues permanent injunction on Oklahoma Sharia law ban". CNN . Retrieved April 23, 2024.
  16. Reilly, Ryan J. (August 15, 2013). "Oklahoma Anti-Sharia Constitutional Amendment Struck Down By Federal Judge". HuffPost . Retrieved April 23, 2024.
  17. Schlachtenhaufen, Mark (March 18, 2011). "CAIR-OK launches anti-Sharia bill campaign". Norman Transcript . Retrieved April 23, 2024.
  18. "Lawmaker plans to revise bill prohibiting Sharia law". Muskogee Phoenix . Associated Press. January 11, 2012. Retrieved April 23, 2024.
  19. Quazilbash, Homa (April 5, 2012). "Update: Bill Banning Sharia Law In Oklahoma Killed In Committee". KTUL . Retrieved April 23, 2024.