Abdul Rahim Shapiee

Last updated

Abdul Rahim Shapiee
Bornc. 1977
Singapore
Died5 August 2022(2022-08-05) (aged 44–45)
Changi Prison, Singapore
Occupation Uber driver
Criminal statusExecuted
Criminal charge Drug trafficking
Penalty Death

Abdul Rahim bin Shapiee (c.1977 – 5 August 2022) was a Singaporean Uber driver who faced capital punishment in Singapore for trafficking of 41.24g of heroin. After his arrest on 3 August 2015, Abdul Rahim, who was also charged with consuming drugs, was convicted in March 2018 and despite the prosecution's acknowledgement of his role as a courier and himself having provided substantive assistance to the authorities, Abdul Rahim still received the death penalty since he had performed duties that exceeded that of a mere drug runner. After failing to overturn his sentence through appeal, Abdul Rahim was hanged on 5 August 2022. One of his two accomplices, Ong Seow Ping, was also arrested and executed for drug trafficking, and the other was serving a life sentence for the same offence.

Contents

Background and case

Personal life

Abdul Rahim bin Shapiee was born to parents Shapiee bin Yahya and Zubedah binte Mohd in 1977. He had a brother Muhammad Hanafiee and sister Norhafizah, and he also had several cousins (including two of Chinese descent), uncles and aunts. He worked as an Uber driver prior to his arrest, and had been arrested several times for drug consumption. [1] [2]

Arrest

Abdul Rahim was arrested on 3 August 2015 after the Central Narcotics Bureau (CNB) monitored him and raided his flat. The search in his flat yielded 14 packets and three straws of diamorphine, and the total amount of the diamorphine weighed not less than 41.24g. Abdul Rahim admitted to possessing these drugs for trafficking and confessed that some of the drugs were intended for his own consumption. During his time in custody, Abdul Rahim was contacted by his accomplice Ong Seow Ping, who did not know about his capture. Under the police's instructions, Abdul Rahim contacted Ong for an arranged delivery of one pound of the drugs, which allowed the police to arrest him as well after he was lured out of his home to deliver the drugs. Ong's flat was also searched and the police found 51.73g of diamorphine in his possession. The arrests of Abdul Rahim and Ong led to both of them being charged for drug trafficking, which carries the death penalty in Singapore. [3]

A third accomplice, Nuraiin binte Rosman, was arrested at the same location together with Abdul Rahim. She was sentenced to life imprisonment in a separate trial since she was acting as a mere courier at the time of the offence. She later became one of the prosecution's witnesses at Abdul Rahim's trial. [4]

Trial and sentencing

High Court proceedings and conviction

The joint trial of Abdul Rahim Shapiee and Ong Seow Ping lasted between 28 September 2017 and 15 March 2018 at the High Court. Abdul Rahim stated in his defence that he intended for a large amount of the diamorphine for his consumption, and stated that he was threatened by the police investigators to confess or that his family and wife would be prosecuted as well for his offence. The High Court however, rejected that the police had threatened Abdul Rahim since the fears harboured by Abdul Rahim were self-perceived and not possible to happen, and also, Abdul Rahim's claim of his high intake of diamorphine (half a packet) was disputed because of the case evidence showing that Abdul Rahim normally smoked one straw every two days, and based on the calculations through the amount of diamorphine he possessed, Abdul Rahim's supply would last him for nearly three years. Abdul Rahim had also admitted that he consumed methamphetamine to make up for the lowered intake of diamorphine he adopted from July 2014 onwards. [5] [6]

Besides, Abdul Rahim only earned a monthly income of less than S$2,000 through his driver job, and roughly $800 a week working for his father's business. This worked out to around S$5,200 a month. He did not work as a driver since July 2014 and it reduced his income, and given the high costs he incurred from purchasing his drugs, his low income would not have allowed him to afford the drugs unless he made up for it with the huge profit he gained from drug trafficking (as proven by the proceeds he yielded from trafficking). As such, Abdul Rahim was found guilty of capital drug trafficking on 15 March 2018 and convicted as charged. [7]

Death penalty

Although the prosecution acknowledged Abdul Rahim as a courier and issued him a certificate of substantive assistance for cooperating with the authorities in arresting Ong and their disruption of drug-related activities, the trial judge Valerie Thean found that Abdul Rahim was not acting as a mere courier, as there was evidence to show that he repacked the drugs and gained payment for his deliveries, which went beyond a courier's duties of transporting the drugs. For this aspect, 41-year-old Abdul Rahim Shapiee was deemed ineligible for the alternative sentence of life imprisonment, and hence, he was sentenced to death on 15 March 2018, the same date of his conviction. 45-year-old Ong Seow Ping also received the death sentence on the same date of Abdul Rahim's sentencing after the prosecution did not certify him as a courier. [8]

Abdul Rahim was not the first certified courier to be sentenced to death. Before his case, 54-year-old Singaporean Hamzah Ibrahim was the first to receive the death sentence in 2017 for trafficking 26.29g of heroin despite receiving the certificate for providing substantive assistance, due to the High Court judging that Hamzah had performed duties exceeding those of a courier. [9]

Appeal processes

2020 appeal hearing

On 5 March 2020, Abdul Rahim lost his appeal against the sentence, with the Court of Appeal determining that the trial judge's findings in his case were correct and without error. [10]

Racial discrimination lawsuit

In August 2021, an appeal was made by 17 Malay death row inmates, including Abdul Rahim himself, against their respective sentences on basis of alleged racial discrimination. It was revealed that between 2010 and 2021, Malays made up 66 of the 120 prosecutions for drug trafficking, where over 76% of them were sentenced to death. 50 out of 77 people sentenced to death between 2010 and 2021 were revealed to be Malays. Abdul Rahim and the 16 other prisoners thus submitted that the prosecution of suspects over capital cases were laced with racial discrimination and differential treatment based on the alleged "over-representation" of minorities (especially the Malays) on Singapore's death row. [11] However, the lawsuit was dismissed by the courts on 2 December 2021, because there was no evidence of differential treatment towards the inmates based on their ethnicity and race, and these allegations should be considered as an abuse of the court processes due to them being potentially casting aspersions on the integrity and reputation of Singapore's laws. [12] Abdul Rahim's two lawyers (including M Ravi) were both ordered to pay S$10,000 in costs for filing the lawsuit. [13] [14] [15] [16]

Death warrant and response

On 29 July 2022, Abdul Rahim Shapiee's death warrant was finalized and it was mailed to his sister. Abdul Rahim's execution was scheduled to take place on 5 August 2022. Ong Seow Ping, Abdul Rahim's accomplice, was also scheduled to hang on the same date and time as Abdul Rahim. [17]

There were eight executions carried out within the past five months prior to the date when both Abdul Rahim and Ong were due for execution, with the latest being the double executions of 34-year-old Malaysian Rahmat Karimon and his 46-year-old Singaporean co-accused co-conspirator Zainal bin Hamad on 2 August. [18] [19] There were appeals made locally and internationally for clemency in the cases of Ong and Abdul Rahim, and among them were the human rights experts of the United Nations, who condemned Singapore for their use of the death penalty and asked that a moratorium should be placed on capital punishment and all upcoming executions in Singapore be cancelled in favour of eventual abolition. [20] [21] [22] The rise in executions in Asian countries (especially the military junta-led Myanmar) had led to Singapore being named as one of the few countries that the United Nations criticized for continuing the practice of capital punishment despite the growing international trend of the abolition of capital punishment. [23]

Final appeal process

Lawsuit against Attorney-General

On 3 August 2022, two days before he was set to hang, Abdul Rahim became one of the 24 death row prisoners to file a lawsuit against the Attorney-General of Singapore, and they brought forward claims that there were miscarriages of justice in their cases as they were denied their access to legal counsel and had their preparations of appeal hindered, which was influenced by the recent cases of inmates having to argue in their appeals without any lawyers to represent them. They claimed their access to counsel was obstructed due to the strict court orders and penalties issued against any lawyers who made appeals without merit or abused the court process, which led to a supposed climate of fear among lawyers and made them opt to not represent the inmates facing imminent execution. [24] [25] However, these allegations were rejected by the High Court as the lawsuit was an abuse of process and "plainly unsustainable and unmeritorious", and the courts stated that there may have been "perfectly valid and legitimate reasons" why lawyers declined to take up the inmates' cases apart from costs orders, and hence, the basis that lawyers were threatened by the court penalties to not take up these cases and argue the appeals that contained no merit were not supported at all by concrete evidence. [26] [27]

On 4 August 2022, the Court of Appeal rejected the follow-up appeal by the prisoners against the High Court's verdict. Abdul Rahim also failed to obtain a stay of execution in another appeal. Ong, on the other hand, did not appeal at all. [28] [29]

Sister's complaint

Besides the lawsuit, Abdul Rahim's sister Norhafizah filed a complaint to the courts that the prison authorities had not carried out instructions from her brother who, on 25 July 2022, asked for the necessary documents to file an appeal to delay his hanging and review his case, which she claimed had allegedly led to the legal application being blocked and not being heard earlier before the scheduled execution. However, the Singapore Prison Service (SPS) refuted the claims and made a media statement. [30] They stated that on the date when Abdul Rahim claimed he approached the authorities, the records showed that the prison officers did not receive news of Abdul Rahim or any other prisoner asking for the relevant forms to make any legal application, which proves that Abdul Rahim's allegations against the prison authorities were not true at all. [31] [32]

Also, when two unidentified inmates approached the officers on 28 July, they already received advice from the officers that the inmates should seek such documents and legal advice from only the courts but not prison officers to facilitate the preparation of their planned appeals and applications. Hence the alleged hindrance of the inmates' application also did not stand. [33] [34]

Execution

On 5 August 2022, 45-year-old Abdul Rahim Shapiee and 49-year-old Ong Seow Ping were both hanged at Changi Prison at dawn. They were the ninth and tenth prisoners to be executed during the COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore. [35]

The Singapore Prison Service confirmed that the executions of Ong and Abdul Rahim were being carried out, and the Central Narcotics Bureau released a statement, stating that both were “accorded full due process under the law, and were represented by legal counsel throughout the legal proceedings”. [36] [37]

In the year 2022 itself, a total of eleven executions, including Abdul Rahim's, had been officially carried out in Singapore, all for drug offences. [38]

Aftermath

The International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) condemned the government of Singapore for executing Abdul Rahim and Ong. They also criticized the lack of legal representation by death row inmates in appealing against their executions, and stated that there was a violation of the prisoners' basic right to counsel and there should be measures taken to prevent such situations from occurring. [39] Similarly, the International Bar Association's Human Rights Institute (IBAHRI) also criticized Singapore for the rising trend of executions in the aftermath of Abdul Rahim's death sentence and called for an immediate moratorium on executions to ensure the abolition of capital punishment in Singapore. [40]

On 8 September 2022, both the Ministry of Law (MinLaw) and Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) expressed support for the decision to execute Abdul Rahim and condemned both the ICJ and IBAHRI for inaccurately presenting the facts of his case, stating that every prisoner equally had a right to legal representation in court but this right should not be an excuse for abusing the court process, since Abdul Rahim, whose trial lasted from 2016 to 2018, submitted an appeal merely hours before his execution and the Court of Appeal also stated that his appeal had no merit and thus refused to stay his execution. They also stated that the penalties issued against lawyers like M Ravi for filing baseless appeals were perfectly justified should their misconduct and abuse of court processes were substantially true. About both the ICJ's and IBAHRI's other allegations of racial discrimination of the death penalty by Singapore, both MinLaw and MHA harshly criticized both groups for casting aspersions on the city-state's use of the death penalty, as ethnicity and socio-economic status play no part in how law enforcement agencies discharge their duties, the prosecutorial decisions of the Public Prosecutor and in the decisions of the courts. Both ministries stated that the death penalty was applied for the most serious crimes in Singapore, which also includes drug trafficking due to the harmful effects of drugs on abusers and families). They strongly asserted that every country has a sovereign right to decide their judicial system and no international consensus exists about whether capital punishment for drugs constitutes a breach of international law or not, and respect should be given to such rights in addition to urging the IBAHRI and ICJ to get their facts right. [41] [42]

In light of Abdul Rahim's execution, Pritam Singh, opposition leader of Parliament and chairman of Workers' Party, wrote to Singapore newspaper Today to express his support for the death penalty for drug crimes in Singapore and the execution of drug traffickers. Besides his opinion that the death penalty should remain due to high public support and its deterrence effect, Singh cited that there should be changes made to rectify some inevitable shortcomings about the courts' need to determine the extent of one's cooperation with the authorities during investigations of suspected drug trafficking before sentencing the said person to death or life imprisonment. [43]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capital punishment in Singapore</span> Death penalty as a legal punishment in Singapore

Capital punishment in Singapore is a legal penalty. Executions in Singapore are carried out by long drop hanging, and usually take place at dawn. Thirty-three offences—including murder, drug trafficking, terrorism, use of firearms and kidnapping—warrant the death penalty under Singapore law.

Capital punishment in Malaysia is a legal penalty in Malaysian law.

Yong Vui Kong is a Malaysian who was sentenced to death in Singapore for trafficking more than 15 grams of heroin in 2007. His sentence was reduced to life imprisonment and caning as a result of Singapore's amendments to the Misuse of Drugs Act.

See Kee Oon is a Singaporean judge who is currently a Judge of the Supreme Court and was the Presiding Judge of the State Courts.

Mathavakannan Kalimuthu is a Singaporean who, together with his two friends, murdered a gangster named Saravanan Michael Ramalingam on 26 May 1996. Mathavakannan, who was arrested on 4 July 1996, was tried and convicted of murder by the High Court of Singapore. As murder was a hanging offence in Singapore and since he was 16 days past his 18th birthday when he committed murder, Mathavakannan was sentenced to suffer the mandatory sentence of death on 27 November of the same year he killed Saravanan. Mathavakannan's two accomplices were also found guilty and sentenced to death in the same trial.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Execution of Nagaenthran K. Dharmalingam</span> Execution of a Malaysian Indian for drug trafficking in Singapore (1988–2022)

Nagaenthran a/l K. Dharmalingam was a Malaysian drug trafficker who was convicted of trafficking 42.72 grams of heroin in April 2009 upon entering Singapore from Malaysia at Woodlands Checkpoint with a bundle of heroin strapped to his thigh. Nagaenthran confessed to committing the crime, but gave statements claiming that he was ordered to commit the crime out of duress by a mastermind who assaulted him and threatened to kill his girlfriend and his family. He also claimed he did so to get money to pay off his debts before he later denied any knowledge of the contents of his bundle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pannir Selvam Pranthaman</span> Convicted drug trafficker on death row in Singapore

Pannir Selvam a/l Pranthaman is a Malaysian drug trafficker who was convicted of trafficking 51.84g of heroin at Woodlands Checkpoint in September 2014. Pannir, who was not certified as a drug courier, was sentenced to death in Singapore for his crime in May 2017. After his appeal was dismissed in February 2018, Pannir and his family submitted various clemency petitions, which were all rejected on 17 May 2019.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Datchinamurthy Kataiah</span> Malaysian drug convict on death row in Singapore

Datchinamurthy a/l Kataiah is a Malaysian man who was sentenced to death in Singapore for drug trafficking. Datchinamurthy was convicted of trafficking nearly 45g of heroin across the Woodlands Checkpoint from Malaysia to Singapore in January 2011. Having been convicted of the crime and also not certified as a courier, Datchinamurthy was sentenced to death in 2015. He had a co-accused, Christeen d/o Jayamany, who was sentenced to life imprisonment for the same offence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abdul Kahar Othman</span> Singaporean drug convict executed in 2022

Abdul Kahar bin Othman was a Singaporean drug trafficker who was found guilty in 2013 of two charges of trafficking a total of 66.77 grams of heroin in Singapore, and later sentenced to death by the High Court in February 2015. After the end of his trial, Abdul Kahar tried to appeal the verdict but the courts dismissed his legal challenges and upheld his death sentence.

Gobi a/l Avedian is a Malaysian drug convict who is currently serving a 15-year term of imprisonment in Singapore for attempted importation of a Class C drug. Gobi was at first, charged in 2014 with the capital charge of trafficking over 40.22g of heroin, which attracts the death penalty in Singapore. In his defence, Gobi stated that he was unaware he was carrying heroin and thought he was carrying "chocolate drugs" as what his two friends told him when he received an offer to deliver the drugs for money to pay his daughter's surgery fees.

Norasharee bin Gous was a Singaporean who was found guilty of soliciting a man named Mohamad Yazid Md Yusof to traffic 120.90g of diamorphine (heroin). Upon the courier's arrest on 23 October 2013, Norasharee was not arrested until July 2015, and he was charged with abetting and instigating Yazid to commit drug trafficking. A third co-accused, Kalwant Singh Jogindar Singh, was also arrested on the same date and venue as Yazid and charged in court for drug trafficking.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kalwant Singh (drug trafficker)</span> Malaysian drug trafficker executed in Singapore in 2022

Kalwant Singh a/l Jogindar Singh was a Malaysian drug trafficker who was found guilty of having 60.15g of diamorphine (heroin) in his possession and trafficking 120.90g of the same substance. Kalwant along with another man named Mohamad Yazid Md Yusof were arrested on 23 October 2013, and the alleged mastermind Norasharee Gous was captured two years later in July 2015, and all three of them were charged with drug trafficking. It was alleged that Norasharee had told Yazid to help import the diamorphine after meeting up with Kalwant, who was to carry the drugs in Singapore to pass on to Yazid for the purpose of trafficking. Kalwant, however, denied that he had knowledge of the drugs and alleged that he was given death threats that forced him to help do the job without knowing it was drugs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nazeri Lajim</span> Singaporean hanged in 2022 for drug trafficking

Nazeri bin Lajim, full name Nazeri bin Lajim Hertslet, was a Singaporean drug trafficker. Prior to his arrest in April 2012, Nazeri went to prison several times for drug consumption and several other drug offences, and was said to be addicted to drugs at age 14. Nazeri and his Malaysian accomplice were both brought to trial and found guilty five years later on 8 August 2017.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Life imprisonment in Singapore</span> Legal punishment in Singapore

Life imprisonment is a legal penalty in Singapore. This sentence is applicable for more than forty offences under Singapore law, such as culpable homicide not amounting to murder, attempted murder, kidnapping by ransom, criminal breach of trust by a public servant, voluntarily causing grievous hurt with dangerous weapons, and trafficking of firearms, in addition to caning or a fine for certain offences that warrant life imprisonment.

Vignes s/o Mourthi was a Malaysian convicted drug trafficker who was found guilty of trafficking 27.65 grams of diamorphine on 20 September 2001. After the end of his trial in August 2002, Vignes and his accomplice Moorthy a/l Angappan were both sentenced to death since the death penalty was mandatory for the amount trafficked by the duo. Despite the immense evidence against him, Vignes maintained his innocence and appealed many times to overturn his conviction and sentence. Ultimately, Vignes was put to death alongside Moorthy as scheduled on 26 September 2003. His execution remained a controversy even in the aftermath due to his insistent claims of innocence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Execution of Elke Tsang Kai-mong</span> Hong Kong drug trafficker (1964–1994)

Elke Tsang Kai-mong was a 30 year old female Hongkonger who was executed in Singapore after being charged and found guilty with smuggling over 4 kg of diamorphine into the country. Tsang, the daughter of a high-ranking Hong Kong police officer, was caught on 26 July 1992 at Changi Airport with 22 packets of diamorphine stuffed inside the inner lining of her two jackets. Despite putting up a defence that she had committed the crime out of fear for her life, Tsang was nonetheless found guilty of capital drug trafficking after a six-day trial and sentenced to death on 19 October 1993. She was one of the few women from Hong Kong who faced the gallows for drug offences in Singapore back in the 1990s. Tsang was hanged on 16 December 1994 after losing her appeal.

Mohamed Shalleh bin Abdul Latiff was a Singaporean delivery driver who was found guilty and sentenced to death in January 2019 for one count of trafficking 54.04g of diamorphine. Mohamed Shalleh, who was arrested in August 2016, put up a defense that when he took the offer from a friend to deliver the packages of diamorphine, he misbelieved that the contents he delivered were contraband cigarettes instead of diamorphine.

Roszaidi bin Osman is a Singaporean drug trafficker who is presently serving a life sentence for trafficking in 32.54g of diamorphine in October 2015. Roszaidi and four others were all arrested and charged with capital drug trafficking, though eventually, in January 2019, only Roszaidi and one accomplice out of the remaining four were found guilty as charged and sentenced to death.

References

  1. ↑ "Solidarity letter for Nagaenthran" (PDF). Transformative Justice Collective. 8 November 2021. Retrieved 4 August 2022.
  2. ↑ "Public Prosecutor v Ong Seow Ping and Another" (PDF). Singapore Law Watch. 15 March 2018. Retrieved 3 August 2022.
  3. ↑ "Public Prosecutor v Ong Seow Ping and Another" (PDF). Singapore Law Watch. 15 March 2018. Retrieved 3 August 2022.
  4. ↑ Tang, Louisa (5 August 2022). "24 death-row inmates' lawsuit against AG: Apex court rejects appeal and last-ditch stay of execution for prisoner". Today. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
  5. ↑ "Life and death decisions, made without legal advice". Transformative Justice Collective. 2 August 2022. Retrieved 3 August 2022.
  6. ↑ "Abdul Rahim bin Shapiee, who faces execution on 5 Aug, received AGC's certificate of substantive assistance". Wake Up SG. 31 July 2022. Retrieved 4 August 2022.
  7. ↑ "Public Prosecutor v Ong Seow Ping and Another" (PDF). Singapore Law Watch. 15 March 2018. Retrieved 3 August 2022.
  8. ↑ "Public Prosecutor v Ong Seow Ping and Another" (PDF). Singapore Law Watch. 15 March 2018. Retrieved 3 August 2022.
  9. ↑ "2 drug traffickers fail in bid to escape gallows". The Straits Times. 26 September 2017. Retrieved 3 August 2022.
  10. ↑ "Abdul Rahim bin Shapiee, who faces execution on 5 Aug, received AGC's certificate of substantive assistance". Wake Up SG. 31 July 2022. Retrieved 4 August 2022.
  11. ↑ "Singapore Malay death row inmates file historic suit accusing govt of racial bias". Malaysia Now. 31 August 2021. Retrieved 22 July 2022.
  12. ↑ "Syed Suhail bin Syed Zin and others v Attorney-General (2021)" (PDF). Singapore Law Watch. 2 December 2021. Retrieved 3 August 2022.
  13. ↑ "Singapore lawyers ordered to pay S$10,000 over ethnic bias suit by Malay death row inmates". Malaysia Now. 12 May 2022. Retrieved 3 August 2022.
  14. ↑ "M Ravi among 2 lawyers ordered to pay costs over death row inmates' case alleging ethnic bias". CNA. 23 June 2022. Retrieved 3 August 2022.
  15. ↑ "Syed Suhail bin Syed Zin and others v Attorney-General (2022)" (PDF). Singapore Law Watch. 23 June 2022. Retrieved 3 August 2022.
  16. ↑ "Syed Suhail bin Syed Zin and others v Attorney-General (2022)". Supreme Court of Singapore. 23 June 2022. Retrieved 3 August 2022.
  17. ↑ "UN rights office 'deeply troubled' by Singapore executions: 'We deplore the hanging'". South China Morning Post. 3 August 2022. Retrieved 4 August 2022.
  18. ↑ "S'pore Executes 2 Drug Traffickers On 2 Aug, They're A 46-Year-Old S'porean & 34-Year-Old M'sian". Must Share News. 3 August 2022. Retrieved 4 August 2022.
  19. ↑ "Malaysian prisoner hugs Quran to chest in final 'photo shoot' ahead of execution". Malaysia Now. 3 August 2022. Archived from the original on 4 August 2022. Retrieved 4 August 2022.
  20. ↑ "UN condemns latest Singapore executions as pressure mounts". Malaysia Now. 3 August 2022. Retrieved 4 August 2022.
  21. ↑ "Comment by UN Human Rights Office spokesperson Liz Throssell on executions in Singapore". United Nations. 2 August 2022. Retrieved 4 August 2022.
  22. ↑ "UN deplores double execution in Singapore". The Star. 3 August 2022. Retrieved 4 August 2022.
  23. ↑ "Judge, Jury & Executioner – Politics of the Hangman's Noose". The Citizen. 4 August 2022. Retrieved 4 August 2022.
  24. ↑ "Ahead of busy execution week, 23 inmates accuse Singapore of denying them justice in historic suit". Malaysia Now. 1 August 2022. Retrieved 4 August 2022.
  25. ↑ "Singapore court gives same-day deadline to lawyerless inmates after invoking 'abuse of process' on suit". Malaysia Now. 2 August 2022. Retrieved 4 August 2022.
  26. ↑ "High Court strikes out lawsuit by 24 death row inmates who claim access to lawyers is obstructed". CNA. 3 August 2022. Retrieved 4 August 2022.
  27. ↑ "Singapore execution toll set to climb after inmates' complaint of no access to counsel dismissed". Malaysia Now. 4 August 2022. Retrieved 4 August 2022.
  28. ↑ "Apex court throws out suit by 24 death row inmates alleging right to counsel violated". The Straits Times. 5 August 2022. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
  29. ↑ "24死囚起诉总检察署 三司赶在正法前一天深夜驳回". Lianhe Zaobao (in Chinese). 5 August 2022. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
  30. ↑ "Allegations by Sister of Prisoner Awaiting Capital Punishment". Singapore Prison Service. 4 August 2022. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
  31. ↑ "S'pore Prison Service rebuts claim by death row inmate's sister that filing of court application was blocked". The Straits Times. 4 August 2022. Retrieved 4 August 2022.
  32. ↑ "Singapore prisons rejects claims that it intentionally blocked death row inmate from submitting legal application". CNA. 4 August 2022. Retrieved 4 August 2022.
  33. ↑ "Prison officers did not get in the way of death row inmates who sued Attorney-General, says S'pore Prison Service". Today. 4 August 2022. Retrieved 4 August 2022.
  34. ↑ "死囚家属指监狱署阻碍提交民事申索 当局：指控不实". 8 World News (in Chinese). 4 August 2022. Retrieved 4 August 2022.
  35. ↑ "Singapore carries out another double dawn hanging after marathon midnight appeal". Malaysia Now. 5 August 2022. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
  36. ↑ "Singapore has executed 10 people in 4 months despite evidence it doesn't work as a deterrent". South China Morning Post. 5 August 2022. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
  37. ↑ "Statement in Response to Media Queries". Central Narcotics Bureau. 5 August 2022. Retrieved 6 August 2022.
  38. ↑ "11 judicial executions in 2022; none in previous two years". The Straits Times. 9 February 2023.
  39. ↑ "Singapore: Halt executions and cease punitive cost orders against death-row lawyers". International Commission of Jurists. 9 August 2022. Retrieved 14 August 2022.
  40. ↑ "Singapore: IBAHRI condemns rise in executions and calls for halt in enforcement". International Bar Association. 11 August 2022. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
  41. ↑ "Calls from international groups to halt death penalty in Singapore contained 'inaccuracies', say MinLaw, MHA in rebuttal". Today. 8 September 2022. Retrieved 8 September 2022.
  42. ↑ "S'pore cites inaccuracies, refutes NGOs' claims of international consensus against death penalty". The Straits Times. 8 September 2022. Retrieved 8 September 2022.
  43. ↑ "Commentary: Death penalty for drug trafficking should stay, but certain aspects of drug law can be improved". Today. 18 August 2022. Retrieved 18 August 2022.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.