Ahl al-Ra'y

Last updated

The Ahl al-Ra'y [a] refers to an Islamic creedal group advocating for the use of reason for theological decisions and scriptural interpretation. [1] They were one of two main groups debating the source of Islamic creed in the second century of Islam, the other being Ahl al-Hadith (the people of hadith). [2]

Contents

Its proponents, which included many early jurists of the Hanafi school, used the term ra'y to refer to "sound" or "considered" reasoning, such as qiyas (analogical deduction). [1] Their opponents from the Ahl al-Hadith creedal group held that the Quran and authentic hadith were the only admissible sources of Islamic law, and objected to any use of ra'y in jurisprudence, whether in the form of qiyas, istislah (consideration of public interest), or hiyal (legal subterfuges). [3] According to Daniel W. Brown, Ahl al-Ra'y thought a hadith should "sometimes be subject to other overriding principles" such as the "continuous practice" of the community and "general principles of equity" which was claimed to "better represent the spirit of the Prophet" Muhammad. [4]

Over time, Hanafi jurists gradually came to accept the primacy of the Quran and hadith advocated by the Ahl al-Hadith creedal group, restricting the use of other forms of legal reasoning to interpretation of these scriptures. [3] In turn, Hanbali jurists, who had led the Ahl al-Hadith creedal group, gradually came to accept the use of qiyas. [3]

Terminology

Ra'y is an Arabic word that literally means reason, opinion, idea, and other similar words. According to Lisan al-Arab, ra'y was used to refer to an excellent opinion in Pre-Islamic Arabia. Later definitions used it to refer to an opinion derived from deep contemplation and sound judgement. Those who prioritized the usage of ra'y in Islamic law became known as Ahl al-Ra'y [5] or Așḥāb al-Ra'y [b] , sometimes referred to in English as rationalists. [6] [7] [8] Other names include Ahl al-Qiyās [c] , Ahl an-Naẓar [d] , and Ahl al-Kalām [e] [6] . Sometimes Ahl al-Kalām is considered its own separate category, containing the Mu'tazila and rejectors of hadith. [4] [9]

Ahl al-Ra'y did not necessarily reject all hadith. Rather, many accepted the usage of hadith but nonetheless, gave preference and greater importance to ra'y. [10] [11] To Ahl al-Ra'y, it was just one source of Islamic law among many, not necessarily given any more importance than other sources like qiyas or istihsan . They believed that hadith must sometimes be subjected to general religious principles like the "continuous practice" of the community and "general principles of equity" which was claimed to "better represent the spirit of the Prophet" Muhammad. [4]

History

Ra'y originally was viewed in a very positive sense to refer to sound and considered opinion based on reasoning. The emergence of hadith did not initially affect these established forms of legal reasoning, and ra'y continued to dominate the Islamic world until the mid-8th century CE. About two-thirds of Zuhrī's transmitted doctrine contained ra'y and only one third contained reports from earlier authorities. For Qatada ibn Di'ama, 62% of his transmitted doctrine contained ra'y and of what was remaining, 84% was the ra'y of previous authorities. However, with the rise of traditionalism, the term got an increasingly negative association with arbitrary or fallible human thought. [12] Traditionalists would at times claim ra'y was imposing human subjectivity onto God, while rationalists would at times claim much of the hadith materials, especially akhbār al-āḥād (single-transmitter reports), to have too uncertain accuracy. Traditionalists would often be accused of being primitive while rationalists were accused of being impious. [13] In contrast to previous centuries where few jurists were seen as traditionalists (and most had acquired this description after the fact), the 9th century had many jurists identify clearly as traditionalists. The traditionalists had experienced an "unprecedented upsurge" by the last quarter of the 8th century, and by the mid-9th century, "ḥadīth had won the war against ra'y". Conversion from the rationalist to traditionalist camp was "frequent" while the reverse was "rare to nonexistent". [14]

After Al-Shafi'i (founder of the Shafi'i school), traditionalism "gained significant strength, attracting many jurists who can easily be described as staunch opponents of rationalism". Ahmad ibn Hanbal (founder of the Hanbali school) and Dawud al-Zahiri (founder of the Zahiri school) went even further than Al-Shafi'i in emphasis of the "centrality of scripture" and criticism of the apparent "repugnant nature of human reasoning". However, ibn Hanbal did accept the use of qiyas when considered absolutely necessary while al-Zahiri categorically opposed it in all circumstances. Thus during the seven decades between al-Shafi'i and al-Zahiri, the traditionalist movement took a staunch uncompromising opposition towards rationalism. The Mihna, an 18-year period of persecution against traditionalists, instituted by Abbasid caliph al-Ma'mun, had made its victims like ibn Hanbal emerge as heroes, and its eventual end exemplifying the defeat of the rationalists. However, even by the end of the Mihna, a majority of jurists did not fully subscribe to either camp, seeing the traditionalism of ibn Hanbal as too rigid and the rationalism of the Mu'tazila and their supporters as too libertarian. [15]

However, while exclusive affiliation to one of the two camps was common in the early to mid-9th century, most jurists by the end of the century had combined the two camps in some way. A synthesis of the two camps "flourished" between the years 870 and 1000. [15] As it became increasingly clear that hadith was here to stay, especially with the internationalization of Islamic legal scholarship (making a more universally-applicable hadith more appealing), rationalists started to reckon with the reality of the rise of hadith and that acceptance within mainstream Islam would require compromising with traditionalists. The jurist that seems to have initiated this re-grounding of rationalists was Muhammad ibn Shuja al-Thalji, seeking to preserve the cause of his school, the Iraqi Hanafites. Extreme traditionalists also moderated, such as Hanbalites accepting limited use of qiyas (an exception being the aforementioned Zahiri school which adamantly refused to join the synthesis). By the end of the ninth century, a majority of jurists had embraced this synthesis (which is not to say these jurists completely abandoned their leanings towards one position or the other). [16] By the 10th century, this synthesis had been fully in place, largely unquestioned until the 19th century. [15] According to Daniel W. Brown, "[t]his was, by all appearances, a complete triumph for the așḥāb al-ḥadith", however, this victory was limited. The theoretical position of hadith remained largely unchallenged by all of the classical madhhabs but there remained debates over if Muhammad had legal intent in his statements, if his statements were related to his religious mission or other non-binding actions, and the surrounding context of his statements. [17]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Arabic: أهل الرأي, romanized: ahl al-raʿy, lit.  'people of reason'
  2. ↑ Arabic: أصحاب الرأي, romanized: așḥāb al-raʿy, lit.  'adherents of reason'
  3. ↑ Arabic: أهل القياس, romanized: ahl al-qiyās, lit.  'people of analogy'
  4. ↑ Arabic: أهل النَظَر, romanized: ahl an-naẓar, lit.  'people of insight'
  5. ↑ Arabic: أهل ٱلْكَلَام, romanized: ahl al-kalām, lit.  'people of discourse'

Related Research Articles

<i>Fiqh</i> Islamic jurisprudence

Fiqh is Islamic jurisprudence. Fiqh is often described as the style of human understanding and practices of the sharia; that is, human understanding of the divine Islamic law as revealed in the Quran and the sunnah. Fiqh expands and develops Shariah through interpretation (ijtihad) of the Quran and Sunnah by Islamic jurists (ulama) and is implemented by the rulings (fatwa) of jurists on questions presented to them. Thus, whereas sharia is considered immutable and infallible by Muslims, fiqh is considered fallible and changeable. Fiqh deals with the observance of rituals, morals and social legislation in Islam as well as economic and political system. In the modern era, there are four prominent schools (madh'hab) of fiqh within Sunni practice, plus two within Shi'a practice. A person trained in fiqh is known as a faqīh.

Ijtihad is an Islamic legal term referring to independent reasoning by an expert in Islamic law, or the thorough exertion of a jurist's mental faculty in finding a solution to a legal question. It is contrasted with taqlid. According to classical Sunni theory, ijtihad requires expertise in the Arabic language, theology, revealed texts, and principles of jurisprudence, and is not employed where authentic and authoritative texts are considered unambiguous with regard to the question, or where there is an existing scholarly consensus (ijma). Ijtihad is considered to be a religious duty for those qualified to perform it. An Islamic scholar who is qualified to perform ijtihad is called as a "mujtahid".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hanafi school</span> School of Islamic jurisprudence

The Hanafi school or Hanafism is one of the four major schools of Islamic jurisprudence within Sunni Islam. It was established by the 8th-century scholar, jurist, and theologian Abu Hanifa, a follower whose legal views were primarily preserved by his two disciples Abu Yusuf and Muhammad al-Shaybani. As the oldest and most-followed of the four major Sunni schools, it is also called the "school of the people of opinion". Many Hanafis also follow the Maturidi school of theology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hanbali school</span> School of Islamic jurisprudence

The Hanbali school or Hanbalism is one of the four major schools of Islamic jurisprudence within Sunni Islam. It is named after and based on the teachings of the 9th-century scholar, jurist and traditionist, Ahmad ibn Hanbal, and later institutionalized by his students. One who ascribes to the Hanbali school is called a Hanbali, Hanbalite or Hanbalist. It is the smallest and adheres the most strictly to the traditionalist school of theology out of the four major Sunni schools, the others being the Hanafi, Maliki and Shafi'i schools.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Muhammad al-Bukhari</span> Islamic hadith scholar (810–870)

Abū ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl ibn Ibrāhīm al-Juʿfī al-Bukhārī was a 9th-century Muslim muhaddith who is widely regarded as the most important hadith scholar in the history of Sunni Islam. Al-Bukhari's extant works include the hadith collection Sahih al-Bukhari, al-Tarikh al-Kabir, and al-Adab al-Mufrad.

<i>Madhhab</i> School of thought within Islamic jurisprudence

A madhhab refers to any school of thought within Islamic jurisprudence. The major Sunni madhāhib are Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i and Hanbali. They emerged in the ninth and tenth centuries CE and by the twelfth century almost all jurists aligned themselves with a particular madhab. These four schools recognize each other's validity and they have interacted in legal debate over the centuries. Rulings of these schools are followed across the Muslim world without exclusive regional restrictions, but they each came to dominate in different parts of the world. For example, the Maliki school is predominant in North and West Africa; the Hanafi school in South and Central Asia; the Shafi'i school in East Africa and Southeast Asia; and the Hanbali school in North and Central Arabia. The first centuries of Islam also witnessed a number of short-lived Sunni madhhabs. The Zahiri school, which is considered to be endangered, continues to exert influence over legal thought. The development of Shia legal schools occurred along the lines of theological differences and resulted in the formation of the Ja'fari madhhab amongst Twelver Shias, as well as the Isma'ili and Zaidi madhhabs amongst Isma'ilis and Zaidis respectively, whose differences from Sunni legal schools are roughly of the same order as the differences among Sunni schools. The Ibadi legal school, distinct from Sunni and Shia madhhabs, is predominant in Oman. Unlike Sunnis, Shias, and Ibadis, non-denominational Muslims are not affiliated with any madhhab.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Al-Shafi'i</span> Muslim scholar, jurist, and traditionist (767–820)

Al-Shafi'i was a Muslim scholar, jurist, traditionist, theologian, ascetic, and eponym of the Shafi'i school of Sunni jurisprudence. He is known to be the first to write a book upon the principles of Islamic jurisprudence, having authored one of the earliest work on the subject: al-Risala. His legacy and teaching on the matter provided it with a systematic form, thereby "fundamentally influenc[ing] the succeeding generations which are under his direct and obvious impact," and "begin[ning] a new phase of the development of legal theory."

Ahmad ibn Hanbal was a Muslim scholar, jurist, theologian, traditionist, ascetic and eponym of the Hanbali school of Islamic jurisprudence—one of the four major orthodox legal schools of Sunni Islam. The most highly influential and active scholar during his lifetime, Ibn Hanbal went on to become "one of the most venerated" intellectual figures in Islamic history, who has had a "profound influence affecting almost every area" of the traditionalist perspective within Sunni Islam. One of the foremost classical proponents of relying on scriptural sources as the basis for Sunni Islamic law and way of life, Ibn Hanbal compiled one of the most significant Sunni hadith collections, al-Musnad, which has continued to exercise considerable influence on the field of hadith studies up to the present time.

Abu al-Fida Isma'il ibn Umar ibn Kathir al-Dimashqi, known simply as Ibn Kathir, was an Arab Islamic exegete, historian and scholar. An expert on tafsir, tarikh (history) and fiqh (jurisprudence), he is considered a leading authority on Sunni Islam.

In Islamic jurisprudence, qiyas is the process of deductive analogy in which the teachings of the hadith are compared and contrasted with those of the Quran, in order to apply a known injunction (nass) to a new circumstance and create a new injunction. Here the ruling of the sunnah and the Quran may be used as a means to solve or provide a response to a new problem that may arise. This, however, is only the case providing that the set precedent or paradigm and the new problem that has come about will share operative causes. The ʿillah is the specific set of circumstances that trigger a certain law into action. An example of the use of qiyās is the case of the ban on selling or buying of goods after the last call for Friday prayers until the end of the prayer stated in the Quran 62:9. By analogy this prohibition is extended to other transactions and activities such as agricultural work and administration. Among Sunni Muslims, Qiyas has been accepted as a secondary source of Sharia law along with Ijmāʿ, after the primary sources of the Quran, and the Sunnah.

Principles of Islamic jurisprudence are traditional methodological principles used in Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh) for deriving the rulings of Islamic law (sharia).

Joseph Franz Schacht was a British-German professor of Arabic and Islam at Columbia University in New York. He was the leading Western scholar in the areas of Islamic law and hadith studies, whose Origins of Muhammadan Jurisprudence (1950) is still considered a centrally important work on the subject. The author of many articles in the first and second editions of the Encyclopaedia of Islam, Schacht also co-edited the second edition of The Legacy of Islam and authored a textbook titled An Introduction to Islamic Law (1964).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ahl al-Hadith</span> 8th-century Islamic school of thought

Ahl al-Hadith is an Islamic school of Sunni Islam that emerged during the 2nd and 3rd Islamic centuries of the Islamic era as a movement of hadith scholars who considered the Quran and authentic hadith to be the only authority in matters of law and creed. They were known as "Athari" for championing traditionalist theological doctrines which rejected rationalist approaches and advocated a strictly literalist reading of Scriptures. Its adherents have also been referred to as traditionalists and sometimes traditionists. The traditionalists constituted the most authoritative and dominant bloc of Sunni orthodoxy prior to the emergence of mad'habs during the fourth Islamic century.

Ibrahim ibn Khalid al-Kalbi al-Baghdadi (764–854) better known as Abu Thawr was an early Arab scholar of Islam. He was born in 170 AH.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shafi'i school</span> School of Islamic jurisprudence

The Shafi'i school or Shafi'ism is one of the four major schools of Islamic jurisprudence within Sunni Islam. It was founded by the Muslim scholar, jurist, and traditionist al-Shafi'i, "the father of Muslim jurisprudence", in the early 9th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dawud al-Zahiri</span> Muslim scholar, jurist, and theologian (815–883)

Dāwūd ibn ʿAlī ibn Khalaf al-Ẓāhirī was a Sunnī Muslim scholar, jurist, and theologian during the Islamic Golden Age, specialized in the study of Islamic law (sharīʿa) and the fields of hermeneutics, biographical evaluation, and historiography of early Islam. He was the eponymous founder of the Ẓāhirī school of thought (madhhab), the fifth school of thought in Sunnī Islam, characterized by its strict adherence to literalism and reliance on the outward (ẓāhir) meaning of expressions in the Quran and ḥadīth literature; the consensus (ijmāʿ) of the first generation of Muhammad's closest companions (ṣaḥāba), for sources of Islamic law (sharīʿa); and rejection of analogical deduction (qiyās) and societal custom or knowledge (urf), used by other schools of Islamic jurisprudence. He was a celebrated, if not controversial, figure during his time, being referred to in Islamic historiographical texts as "the scholar of the era."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Atharism</span> School of theology in Sunni Islam

Atharism is a school of theology in Sunni Islam which developed from circles of the Ahl al-Hadith, a group that rejected rationalistic theology in favor of strict textualism in interpretation the Quran and the hadith.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zahiri school</span> Legal school in Sunni Islam

The Ẓāhirī school or Zahirism is a Sunnī school of Islamic jurisprudence founded in the 9th century by Dāwūd al-Ẓāhirī, a Muslim scholar, jurist, and theologian of the Islamic Golden Age. It is characterized by strict adherence to literalism and reliance on the outward (ẓāhir) meaning of expressions in the Quran and ḥadīth literature; the consensus (ijmāʿ) of the first generation of Muhammad's closest companions (ṣaḥāba), for sources of Islamic law (sharīʿa); and rejection of analogical deduction (qiyās) and societal custom or knowledge (urf), used by other schools of Islamic jurisprudence, although the anti-Hazm wing of Zahiris usually accept religious inference.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ibn Kullab</span> 9th-century Arab Muslim scholar

Ibn Kullab was an early Sunni theologian (mutakallim) in Basra and Baghdad in the first half of the 9th century during the time of the Mihna and belonged, according to Ibn al-Nadim, to the traditionalist group of the Nawabit. His movement, also called Kullabiyya, merged and developed into Ash'arism, which, along with Maturidism and Atharism, forms the theological basis of Sunni Islam.

References

  1. 1 2 Fleet, Kate; Krämer, Gudrun; Matringe, Denis; Nawas, John; Rowson, Everett (eds.). "Ahl al- raʾy". Encyclopaedia of Islam (3rd ed.). Brill Online. doi:10.1163/1573-3912_ei3_COM_22177. ISSN   1873-9830.
  2. ↑ Brown, Daniel W. (1996). Rethinking tradition in modern Islamic thought. Cambridge University Press. p. 13. ISBN   0521570778 . Retrieved 10 May 2018.
  3. 1 2 3 Lapidus, Ira M. (2014). A History of Islamic Societies. Cambridge University Press (Kindle edition). pp. 130–131. ISBN   978-0-521-51430-9.
  4. 1 2 3 Brown, Daniel W.; Brown, Daniel W. (March 1999). Rethinking tradition in modern Islamic thought. Cambridge Middle East Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 13–15. ISBN   978-0-521-65394-7.
  5. ↑ Shafiq, Muhammad (1984). "THE MEANING OF RA'Y AND NATURE OF ITS USAGE IN ISLAMIC LAW (An Examination of Select cases of the Legal Reasoning in the Period of 'Umar, the Second Caliph)". Islamic Studies. 23 (1): 21–32. ISSN   0578-8072.
  6. 1 2 Makdisi, George (February 1979). "The Significance of the Sunni Schools of Law in Islamic Religious History". International Journal of Middle East Studies. 10 (1): 1–8. doi:10.1017/S0020743800053277. ISSN   0020-7438.
  7. ↑ Ruano, Delfina Serrano (2000). "Review of A History of Islamic Legal Theories: An Introduction to the Sunni Usul Al-Fiqh". Journal of Law and Religion. 15 (1/2): 379–383. doi:10.2307/1051528. ISSN   0748-0814.
  8. ↑ Shamsy, Ahmed El (2007). "The First Shāfiʿī: The Traditionalist Legal Thought of Abū Yaʿqūb al-buwayṭī (d. 231/846)". Islamic Law and Society. 14 (3): 301–341. ISSN   0928-9380.
  9. ↑ Hasan, Ahmad (1967). "Early Modes of Ijtihād: Ra'y, Qiyās and Istiḥsān". Islamic Studies. 6 (1): 47–79. ISSN   0578-8072.
  10. ↑ Hallaq, Wael B. (2004). The Origins and Evolution of Islamic Law. Themes in Islamic Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 56. ISBN   978-0-521-80332-8.
  11. ↑ Hasan, Ahmad (1967). "Early Modes of Ijtihād: Ra'y, Qiyās and Istiḥsān". Islamic Studies. 6 (1): 55–56. ISSN   0578-8072.
  12. ↑ Hallaq, Wael B. (2004). The Origins and Evolution of Islamic Law. Themes in Islamic Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 75–76. ISBN   978-0-521-80332-8.
  13. ↑ Shamsy, Ahmed El (2007). "The First Shāfiʿī: The Traditionalist Legal Thought of Abū Yaʿqūb al-buwayṭī (d. 231/846)". Islamic Law and Society. 14 (3): 305. ISSN   0928-9380.
  14. ↑ Hallaq, Wael B. (2004). The Origins and Evolution of Islamic Law. Themes in Islamic Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 123. ISBN   978-0-521-80332-8.
  15. 1 2 3 Hallaq, Wael B. (2004). The Origins and Evolution of Islamic Law. Themes in Islamic Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 125. ISBN   978-0-521-80332-8.
  16. ↑ Hallaq, Wael B. (2004). The Origins and Evolution of Islamic Law. Themes in Islamic Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 126–127. ISBN   978-0-521-80332-8.
  17. ↑ Brown, Daniel W. (March 1999). Rethinking tradition in modern Islamic thought. Cambridge Middle East Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. pp. 18–19. ISBN   978-0-521-65394-7.


This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.