| | |
| AIER's Historic Cotswold Cottage | |
| Abbreviation | AIER |
|---|---|
| Formation | 1933 |
| Founder | Edward C. Harwood |
| Type | 501(c)(3) non-profit think tank |
| 04-2121305 [1] | |
| Purpose | Free market advocacy |
| Location | |
President | Samuel Gregg |
| Revenue | $4,820,000 [1] (2023) |
| Expenses | $9,250,000 [1] (2023) |
| Endowment | $194,000,000 in assets [1] (2023) |
| Website | aier |
The American Institute for Economic Research (AIER) is a classical liberal think tank located in Great Barrington, Massachusetts. [2] [3] It was founded in 1933 by Edward C. Harwood, an economist and investment advisor, and is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit. [4] From January 2022 to April 2025 the organization's president was William P. Ruger, who resigned to serve as Deputy Director of National Intelligence for Mission Integration under president Donald Trump. [5] Ruger was succeeded by Samuel Gregg in 2025. [6]
AIER maintains a global network of local chapters called Harwood Salons (previously called the Bastiat Society). [7] [8]
Col. Edward C. Harwood was a graduate of the United States Military Academy and served in the Army Corps of Engineers. In the 1920s, he began writing freelance magazine articles on economic issues. [9] With $200 (equivalent to $4,858in 2024) saved from selling his articles, Harwood founded AIER in 1933. [9] [4] According to The Berkshire Edge, this makes AIER the "oldest economic research institute in the United States". [10]
Edward Stringham was appointed President of the Institute in 2017; [11] he was preceded by Stephen Adams, [12] Will Ruger became president in 2022, [13] and then Samuel Gregg took over the position in 2025. [6]
In 2019, the Museum of American Finance loaned its entire library collection to AIER, to be hosted, catalogued and made available there. The initial loan period was for five years. [14]
AIER's stated mission is to "[educate] people on the value of personal freedom, free enterprise, property rights, limited government, and sound money." [15] They take positions on specific policies such as free trade, deregulation, and the defense of certain civil liberties. [16]
During the COVID-19 pandemic, AIER was accused of misinformation campaigns and criticized for promoting a herd immunity strategy of "focused protection". [17] [18]
AIER issued a statement in October 2020 called the Great Barrington Declaration (GBD) which argued for a herd immunity strategy of "focused protection" to be put into effect before the general availability of COVID-19 vaccines. [18] [19] Several public health experts criticized the GBD. [18] [20] Anthony Fauci, then infectious disease expert appointed by the White House, called the GBD "total nonsense" and unscientific. [18] Tyler Cowen, a libertarian economist at George Mason University said that the GBD "strikes the wrong tone." [21] The declaration was also criticized by left-leaning, formerly libertarian-leaning, Niskanen Center [22] which now calls itself moderate. [23]
The declaration and its signatories, publicized by the Brownstone Institute, influenced some policies of U.S. President Donald Trump and British Prime Minister Boris Johnson. [24] [25] AIER paid for ads on Facebook during this period, running the following ad from Jeffrey Tucker:
This country needs a serious anti-lockdown movement, one that is not just political but cultural and intellectual, one that is deeply educated on history, philosophy, law, economics, and all sciences, and can rally around traditional American civic postulates concerning individual freedom and the limits of governments, and also around universal principles of human rights. [26]
The organization has published articles such as "Brazilians Should Keep Slashing Their Rainforest", which have been criticized as climate change denial. [27] [28] [29] The institution has also funded research on the comparative benefits that sweatshops supplying multinationals bring to the people working in them. [30] [31]
AIER maintains a global network of local chapters called Harwood Salons (previously called the Bastiat Society). [7] [8] It partners for events, initiatives, and other programming with the Atlas Network and other groups such as the Free to Choose Network, Young Voices, and several university centers across the country. [32] [33] [34]
AIER owns American Investment Services Inc., an investment advisory firm whose fund was valued at around $285 million in 2020 (equivalent to $346,272,984in 2024). [35] [36] [37] Over half of AIER's funding comes from its investments, but it also receives contributions and foundation grants. [26] [18] It has partnered with Emergent Order, a public relations company also funded by the Charles Koch Foundation. [36]
the institute's free-market, libertarian leanings
a libertarian, free-market think tank headquartered in western Massachusetts, known for its attacks on climate change
The personal income tax rate is one factor a CEO would look at in deciding where to relocate, said Stephen Adams, president of the American Institute for Economic Research
Nevertheless, this subgroup maintains a presence in the network and promotes anti-science rhetoric, including nuclear conspiracies. Moreover, the technique of employing discredited scientific positions mirror anti-science and conspiratorial debates on the COVID19 pandemic. This includes the anti-lockdown and misinformation campaigns by the Kock funded libertarian American Institute for Economic Research (AIER). The Koch funded institute created the Great Barrington Declaration, similar to the OSIM's Petition Project, and includes climate sceptic authors Dr Jay Bhattacharya and Sunetra Gupta promoted by the counter-movement organisation the Heartland Institute. Overlaps between AIER and other think tanks in a network funded by Koch Industries show the ongoing relationship between fossil interests and the dissemination of scientific misinformation to protect a business as usual scenario even during the time of an international public health crisis on this international web platform.
Well, it is, not surprisingly, linked to the Charles Koch Institute. And a perusal of its website reveals that until recently it devoted much of its time to climate denial, putting out articles with titles like "Brazilians Should Keep Slashing Their Rainforest." More recently, however, the institute's focus has shifted to Covid denial. Last month, for example, it published an article lauding Gov. Kristi Noem of South Dakota, whose refusal to take action against the coronavirus has turned her state into what the article called "a fortress of liberty and hope protected from the grasps of overbearing politicians."
what are scientists doing fronting a campaign whose back office is run by a thinktank that flirts with climate change denial?