Anna Harvey | |
---|---|
Citizenship | United States |
Academic background | |
Alma mater | Honors Tutorial College, Ohio University Princeton University |
Academic work | |
Discipline | Criminal justice Political economy |
Institutions | New York University |
Anna Harvey is an American social scientist whose research is focused on criminal justice and judicial decisionmaking. She is the 15th President and CEO of the Social Science Research Council. She is also Professor of Politics and founder and Director of the Public Safety Lab at New York University. She is a National Trustee of Ohio University. [1]
Harvey received a B.A. in political science from the Honors Tutorial College at Ohio University in 1988 and a Ph.D. in Politics from Princeton University in 1995. She joined New York University in 1994 and is currently Professor of Politics,Affiliated Professor of Data Science,and Affiliated Professor of Law at New York University. She chaired the university's Department of Politics from 2000 until 2004 and served as Interim Dean of the Graduate School of Arts and Science from 2015 until 2017. [2] She founded the Public Safety Lab at New York University in 2017 and remains its director.
Harvey's early work investigated social dynamics of electoral behavior that may generate positive returns to coordination in both partisanship and turnout. She explored the empirical implications of social coordination effects in a series of articles [3] [4] [5] and in her first book,Votes without Leverage:Women in American Electoral Politics,1920-1970. [6] [7]
In a series of articles and the book,A Mere Machine:The Supreme Court,Congress,and American Democracy,Harvey explored the responsiveness of Supreme Court decisions to congressional preferences. Harvey reported evidence indicating that,even in constitutional cases,the U.S. Supreme Court defers to congressional preferences,in particular to the preferences of majorities in the House of Representatives (the chamber that originates both impeachment and appropriations actions). [8] [9]
Harvey also found that the Court's rejection of congressionally-enacted restrictions on campaign spending led to increases in the conservatism of state and congressional legislators, [10] and that the Supreme Court's strike of the public accommodations protections in the 1875 Civil Rights Law led to weight losses for Black Civil Army veterans in states without state-level public accommodations statutes,but not for white Civil Army veterans (with Emily A. West). [11]
In Judicial Decision-Making:A Coursebook (with Tom S. Clark,Barry Friedman,Allison Larsen,Margaret H. Lemos,and Andrew D. Martin),Harvey and co-authors integrated approaches to judicial decision-making drawn from both the social sciences and from legal thought. [12]
Since the founding of the Public Safety Lab in 2017,Harvey's work has been in the area of criminal justice. One project explored the role of financial incentives in law enforcement,finding that law enforcement in the province of Saskatchewan was responsive to a discontinuity in the rules allocating the distribution of traffic ticket revenue. [13] Another project investigated racial disparities in law enforcement,finding that litigation leading to affirmative action plans in law enforcement reduced racial disparities in crime victimization. [14] A project on racial disparities in criminal appeals found that intermediate appellate court judges in New York State serving on all-white panels were significantly less likely to rule in favor of Black defendants in their reappointment terms. [15]
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 is a landmark piece of federal legislation in the United States that prohibits racial discrimination in voting. It was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson during the height of the civil rights movement on August 6, 1965, and Congress later amended the Act five times to expand its protections. Designed to enforce the voting rights protected by the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, the Act sought to secure the right to vote for racial minorities throughout the country, especially in the South. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the Act is considered to be the most effective piece of federal civil rights legislation ever enacted in the country. The National Archives and Records Administration stated: "The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was the most significant statutory change in the relationship between the federal and state governments in the area of voting since the Reconstruction period following the Civil War".
A Congressional power of enforcement is included in a number of amendments to the United States Constitution. The language "The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation" is used, with slight variations, in Amendments XIII, XIV, XV, XIX, XXIII, XXIV, and XXVI.
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision ruling that racial segregation laws did not violate the U.S. Constitution as long as the facilities for each race were equal in quality, a doctrine that came to be known as "separate but equal". The decision legitimized the many state "Jim Crow laws" re-establishing racial segregation that had been passed in the American South after the end of the Reconstruction era in 1877. Such legally enforced segregation in the South lasted into the 1960s.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a landmark civil rights and labor law in the United States that outlaws discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. It prohibits unequal application of voter registration requirements, racial segregation in schools and public accommodations, and employment discrimination. The act "remains one of the most significant legislative achievements in American history".
Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that redistricting qualifies as a justiciable question under the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause, thus enabling federal courts to hear Fourteenth Amendment-based redistricting cases. The court summarized its Baker holding in a later decision as follows: "the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment limits the authority of a State Legislature in designing the geographical districts from which representatives are chosen either for the State Legislature or for the Federal House of Representatives.". The court had previously held in Gomillion v. Lightfoot that districting claims over racial discrimination could be brought under the Fifteenth Amendment.
Harold Hitz Burton was an American politician and lawyer. He served as the 45th mayor of Cleveland, Ohio, as a U.S. Senator from Ohio, and as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States.
The Civil Rights Act of 1875, sometimes called the Enforcement Act or the Force Act, was a United States federal law enacted during the Reconstruction era in response to civil rights violations against African Americans. The bill was passed by the 43rd United States Congress and signed into law by President Ulysses S. Grant on March 1, 1875. The act was designed to "protect all citizens in their civil and legal rights", providing for equal treatment in public accommodations and public transportation and prohibiting exclusion from jury service. It was originally drafted by Senator Charles Sumner in 1870, but was not passed until shortly after Sumner's death in 1875. The law was not effectively enforced, partly because President Grant had favored different measures to help him suppress election-related violence against blacks and Republicans in the Southern United States.
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania is the highest court in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's Unified Judicial System. It also claims to be the oldest appellate court in the United States, a claim that is disputed by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania began in 1684 as the Provincial Court, and casual references to it as the "Supreme Court" of Pennsylvania were made official in 1722 upon its reorganization as an entity separate from the control of the colonial governor.
Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356 (2001), was a United States Supreme Court case about Congress's enforcement powers under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Supreme Court decided that Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act was unconstitutional, insofar as it allowed states to be sued by private citizens for money damages.
The Equal Protection Clause is part of the first section of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause, which took effect in 1868, provides "nor shall any State ... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." It mandates that individuals in similar situations be treated equally by the law.
Rosemary Barkett is a Mexican-American judge of the Iran–United States Claims Tribunal located in The Hague, Netherlands since 2013. Previously, she served as a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Prior to her nomination for that post, she was chief justice of the Florida Supreme Court.
The Chase Court refers to the Supreme Court of the United States from 1864 to 1873, when Salmon P. Chase served as the sixth Chief Justice of the United States. Chase succeeded Roger Taney as Chief Justice after the latter's death. Appointed by President Abraham Lincoln, Chase served as Chief Justice until his death, at which point Morrison Waite was nominated and confirmed as his successor.
Colegrove v. Green, 328 U.S. 549 (1946), was a United States Supreme Court case. Writing for a 4–3 plurality, Justice Felix Frankfurter held that the federal judiciary had no power to interfere with malapportioned Congressional districts. The Court held that the Elections Clause in Article I, section IV of the U.S. Constitution left to the legislature of each state the authority to establish the time, place, and manner of holding elections for Congressional Representatives, and that only Congress could determine whether individual state legislatures had fulfilled their responsibility to secure fair representation for citizens.
The Jim Crow laws were state and local laws introduced in the Southern United States in the late 19th and early 20th centuries that enforced racial segregation, "Jim Crow" being a pejorative term for an African American. Such laws remained in force until 1965. Formal and informal racial segregation policies were present in other areas of the United States as well, even as several states outside the South had banned discrimination in public accommodations and voting. Southern laws were enacted by white-dominated state legislatures (Redeemers) to disenfranchise and remove political and economic gains made by African Americans during the Reconstruction era. Such continuing racial segregation was also supported by the successful Lily-white movement.
Henry Billings Brown was an American jurist who served as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1891 to 1906.
Thomas Campbell Clark was an American lawyer who served as the 59th United States Attorney General from 1945 to 1949 and as Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1949 to 1967.
Andrew D. Martin is an American political scientist who is the 15th chancellor of Washington University in St. Louis.
The Waite Court refers to the Supreme Court of the United States from 1874 to 1888, when Morrison Waite served as the seventh Chief Justice of the United States. Waite succeeded Salmon P. Chase as Chief Justice after the latter's death. Waite served as Chief Justice until his death, at which point Melville Fuller was nominated and confirmed as Waite's successor.
African Americans were fully enfranchised in practice throughout the United States by the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Prior to the Civil War and the Reconstruction Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, some Black people in the United States had the right to vote, but this right was often abridged or taken away. After 1870, Black people were theoretically equal before the law, but in the period between the end of Reconstruction era and the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 this was frequently infringed in practice.
Tom S. Clark is a political scientist who specializes in American law and courts. He has made contributions to the study of judicial independence, decision-making at the U.S. Supreme Court, judicial elections, and policing and law enforcement.