Anomalous photovoltaic effect

Last updated

The anomalous photovoltaic effect (APE) is a type of a photovoltaic effect which occurs in certain semiconductors and insulators. The "anomalous" refers to those cases where the photovoltage (i.e., the open-circuit voltage caused by the light) is larger than the band gap of the corresponding semiconductor. In some cases, the voltage may reach thousands of volts.

Contents

Although the voltage is unusually high, the short-circuit current is unusually low. Overall, materials that exhibit the anomalous photovoltaic effect have very low power generation efficiencies, and are never used in practical power-generation systems.

There are several situations in which APE can arise.

First, in polycrystalline materials, each microscopic grain can act as a photovoltaic. Then the grains add in series, so that the overall open-circuit voltage across the sample is large, potentially much larger than the bandgap.

Second, in a similar manner, certain ferroelectric materials can develop stripes consisting of parallel ferroelectric domains, where each domain acts like a photovoltaic and each domain wall acts like a contact connecting the adjacent photovoltaics (or vice versa). Again, domains add in series, so that the overall open-circuit voltage is large. [1]

Third, a perfect single crystal with a non-centrosymmetric structure can develop a giant photovoltage. This is specifically called the bulk photovoltaic effect (BPV effect), and occurs because of non-centrosymmetry. Specifically, the electron processes—photo-excitation, scattering, and relaxation—occur with different probabilities for electron motion in one direction versus the opposite direction. [2]

The compound α-In2Se3 can be made to exhibit the bulk photovoltaic effect and outperform traditional solar cells. [3]

Series-sum of grains in a polycrystal

History

This effect was discovered by Starkiewicz et al. in 1946 on PbS films [4] and was later observed on other semiconducting polycrystalline films including CdTe, [5] Silicon, [6] Germanium, [6] ZnTe [7] and InP, [8] as well as on amorphous silicon films [9] [10] and in nanocrystalline silicon systems. [11] Observed photovoltages were found to reach hundreds, and in some cases even thousands of volts. The films in which this effect was observed were generally thin semiconducting films that were deposited by vacuum evaporation onto a heated insulating substrate, held at an angle with respect to the direction of the incident vapor. However, the photovoltage was found to be very sensitive to the conditions and procedure at which the samples were prepared. [12] This made it difficult to get reproducible results which is probably the reason why no satisfactory model for it has been accepted thus far. Several models were, however, suggested to account for the extraordinary phenomenon and they are briefly outlined below. [13]

The oblique deposition can lead to several structure asymmetries in the films. Among the first attempts to explain the APE were few that treated the film as a single entity, such as considering the variation of sample thickness along its length [14] or a non-uniform distribution of electron traps. [15] However, studies that followed generally supported models that explain the effect as resulting from a series of microelements contributing additively to the net photovoltage. The more popular models used to explain the photovoltage are reviewed below.

The Photo–Dember effect

When photogenerated electrons and holes have different mobilities, a potential difference can be created between the illuminated and non-illuminated faces of a semiconductor slab. [16] Generally this potential is created through the depth of the slab, whether it is a bulk semiconductor or a polycrystalline film. The difference between these cases is that in the latter, a photovoltage can be created in each one of the microcrystallites. As was mentioned above, in the oblique deposition process inclined crystallites are formed in which one face can absorb light more than the other. This may cause a photovoltage to be generated along the film, as well as through its depth. The transfer of carriers at the surface of crystallites is assumed to be hindered by the presence of some unspecified layer with different properties, thus cancellation of consecutive Dember voltages is being prevented. To explain the polarity of the PV which is independent of the illumination direction one must assume that there exists a large difference in recombination rates at opposite faces of a crystallite, which is a weakness of this model.

The structure transition model

This model suggests that when a material crystallizes both in cubic and hexagonal structures, an asymmetric barrier can be formed by a residual dipole layer at the interface between the two structures. A potential barrier is formed due to a combination of the band gap difference and the electric fields produced at the interface. One should remember that this model can be invoked to explain anomalous PV effect only in those materials that can demonstrate two types of crystal structure.

The p-n junction model

It was suggested by Starkiewicz [4] that the anomalous PV is developed due to a distribution gradient of positive and negative impurity ions through the microcrystallites, with an orientation such as to give a non-zero total photovoltage. This is equivalent to an array of p-n junctions. However, the mechanism by which such p-n junctions may be formed was not explained.

The surface photovoltage model

The interface between crystallites may contain traps for charge carriers. This may lead to a surface charge and an opposite space charge region in the crystallites, [13] in case that the crystallites are small enough. Under illumination of the inclined crystallites electron-hole pairs are generated and cause a compensation of the charge in the surface and within the crystallites. If it is assumed that the optical absorption depth is much less than the space charge region in the crystallites, then, because of their inclined shape more light is absorbed in one side than in the other. Thus a difference in the reduction of the charge is created between the two sides. This way a photovoltage parallel to the surface is developed in each crystallite.

Bulk photovoltaic effect in a non-centrosymmetric single crystal

A perfect single crystal with a non-centrosymmetric structure can develop a giant photovoltage. This is specifically called the bulk photovoltaic effect, and occurs because of non-centrosymmetry. [2] [17] The electron processes like photo-excitation, scattering, and relaxation may occur with different probabilities for electrons moving one direction versus the opposite direction.

This effect was first discovered in the 1960s. [2] It has been observed in lithium niobate (LiNbO3), [18] barium titanate (BaTiO3) [19] and many other materials. [2]

Theoretical calculations using density functional theory or other methods can predict the extent to which a material will exhibit the bulk photovoltaic effect. [20] [21]

Simple example

An example of a simple system that would exhibit the bulk photovoltaic effect. See text for description. ExampleOfBulkPhotovoltaicEffect.svg
An example of a simple system that would exhibit the bulk photovoltaic effect. See text for description.

Shown at right is an example of a simple system that would exhibit the bulk photovoltaic effect. There are two electronic levels per unit cell, separated by a large energy gap, say 3 eV. The blue arrows indicate radiative transitions, i.e. an electron can absorb a UV photon to go from A to B, or it can emit a UV photon to go from B to A. The purple arrows indicate nonradiative transitions, i.e. an electron can go from B to C by emitting many phonons, or can go from C to B by absorbing many phonons.

When light is shining, an electron in response to the time-varying electric field of light will occasionally move right by absorbing a photon and going from A to B to C. However, it will almost never move in the reverse direction, C to B to A, because the transition from C to B cannot be excited by photons, but instead requires an improbably large thermal fluctuation. Therefore, there is a net rightward photocurrent.

Because the electrons undergo a "shift" each time they absorb a photon (on average), this dc photocurrent with amplitude proportional to the square of the applied field is sometimes called a "shift current". [20]

Distinguishing features

There are several aspects of the bulk photovoltaic effect that distinguish it from other kinds of effects: In the power-generating region of the I-V curve (between open-circuit and short-circuit), electrons are moving in the opposite direction that you would expect from the drift-diffusion equation, i.e. electrons are moving towards higher fermi level or holes are moving towards lower fermi level. This is unusual: For example, in a normal silicon solar cell, electrons move in the direction of decreasing electron-quasi-fermi level, and holes move in the direction of increasing hole-quasi-fermi-level, consistent with the drift-diffusion equation. Power generation is possible only because the quasi-fermi-levels are split. A bulk photovoltaic, by contrast, can generate power without any splitting of quasi-fermi-levels.

This also explains why large open-circuit voltages tend to be seen only in crystals that (in the dark) have very low conductivity: Any electrons that can freely move through the crystal (i.e., not requiring photons to move) will follow the drift-diffusion equation, which means that these electrons will subtract from the photocurrent and reduce the photovoltaic effect.

Each time one electron absorbs one photon (in the power-generating region of the I-V curve), the resulting electron displacement is, on average, at most one or two unit cells or mean-free-paths (this displacement is sometimes called the "anisotropy distance"). [19] [21] This is required because if an electron is excited into a mobile, delocalized state, and then it scatters a few times, then its direction is now randomized and it will naturally start following the drift-diffusion equation. However, in the bulk photovoltaic effect, the desired net electron motion is opposite the direction predicted by the drift-diffusion equation.

For example, it might be the case that when an electron absorbs a photon, it is disproportionately likely to wind up in a state where it is moving leftward. And perhaps each time a photon excites an electron, the electron moves leftward a bit and then immediately relaxes into ("gets stuck in") an immobile state—until it absorbs another photon and the cycle repeats. In this situation, a leftward electron current is possible despite an electric field pushing electrons in the opposite direction. However, when a photon excites an electron, it does not quickly relax back to an immobile state, but instead keeps moving around the crystal and scattering randomly, then the electron will eventually "forget" that it was moving left, and it will wind up being pulled rightward by the electric field. Again, the total leftward motion of an electron, per photon absorbed, cannot be much larger than the mean free path.

A consequence is that the quantum efficiency of a thick device is extremely low. It may require millions of photons to bring a single electron from one electrode to the other. As the thickness increases, the current goes down as much as the voltage goes up.

In some cases, the current has a different sign depending on the light polarization. [19] This would not occur in an ordinary solar cell like silicon.

Applications

The bulk photovoltaic effect is believed to play a role in the photorefractive effect in lithium niobate. [18]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hall effect</span> Electromagnetic effect in physics

The Hall effect is the production of a potential difference across an electrical conductor that is transverse to an electric current in the conductor and to an applied magnetic field perpendicular to the current. It was discovered by Edwin Hall in 1879.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Photoelectric effect</span> Emission of electrons when electromagnetic radiation hits a material

The photoelectric effect is the emission of electrons from a material caused by electromagnetic radiation such as ultraviolet light. Electrons emitted in this manner are called photoelectrons. The phenomenon is studied in condensed matter physics, solid state, and quantum chemistry to draw inferences about the properties of atoms, molecules and solids. The effect has found use in electronic devices specialized for light detection and precisely timed electron emission.

In solid-state physics, the work function is the minimum thermodynamic work needed to remove an electron from a solid to a point in the vacuum immediately outside the solid surface. Here "immediately" means that the final electron position is far from the surface on the atomic scale, but still too close to the solid to be influenced by ambient electric fields in the vacuum. The work function is not a characteristic of a bulk material, but rather a property of the surface of the material.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Band gap</span> Energy range in a solid where no electron states exist

In solid-state physics and solid-state chemistry, a band gap, also called a bandgap or energy gap, is an energy range in a solid where no electronic states exist. In graphs of the electronic band structure of solids, the band gap refers to the energy difference between the top of the valence band and the bottom of the conduction band in insulators and semiconductors. It is the energy required to promote an electron from the valence band to the conduction band. The resulting conduction-band electron are free to move within the crystal lattice and serve as charge carriers to conduct electric current. It is closely related to the HOMO/LUMO gap in chemistry. If the valence band is completely full and the conduction band is completely empty, then electrons cannot move within the solid because there are no available states. If the electrons are not free to move within the crystal lattice, then there is no generated current due to no net charge carrier mobility. However, if some electrons transfer from the valence band to the conduction band, then current can flow. Therefore, the band gap is a major factor determining the electrical conductivity of a solid. Substances having large band gaps are generally insulators, those with small band gaps are semiconductor, and conductors either have very small band gaps or none, because the valence and conduction bands overlap to form a continuous band.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dangling bond</span>

In chemistry, a dangling bond is an unsatisfied valence on an immobilized atom. An atom with a dangling bond is also referred to as an immobilized free radical or an immobilized radical, a reference to its structural and chemical similarity to a free radical.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Photodetector</span> Sensors of light or other electromagnetic energy

Photodetectors, also called photosensors, are sensors of light or other electromagnetic radiation. There are a wide variety of photodetectors which may be classified by mechanism of detection, such as photoelectric or photochemical effects, or by various performance metrics, such as spectral response. Semiconductor-based photodetectors typically use a p–n junction that converts photons into charge. The absorbed photons make electron–hole pairs in the depletion region. Photodiodes and photo transistors are a few examples of photo detectors. Solar cells convert some of the light energy absorbed into electrical energy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Organic field-effect transistor</span> Type of field-effect transistor

An organic field-effect transistor (OFET) is a field-effect transistor using an organic semiconductor in its channel. OFETs can be prepared either by vacuum evaporation of small molecules, by solution-casting of polymers or small molecules, or by mechanical transfer of a peeled single-crystalline organic layer onto a substrate. These devices have been developed to realize low-cost, large-area electronic products and biodegradable electronics. OFETs have been fabricated with various device geometries. The most commonly used device geometry is bottom gate with top drain and source electrodes, because this geometry is similar to the thin-film silicon transistor (TFT) using thermally grown SiO2 as gate dielectric. Organic polymers, such as poly(methyl-methacrylate) (PMMA), can also be used as dielectric. One of the benefits of OFETs, especially compared with inorganic TFTs, is their unprecedented physical flexibility, which leads to biocompatible applications, for instance in the future health care industry of personalized biomedicines and bioelectronics.

Hot carrier injection (HCI) is a phenomenon in solid-state electronic devices where an electron or a “hole” gains sufficient kinetic energy to overcome a potential barrier necessary to break an interface state. The term "hot" refers to the effective temperature used to model carrier density, not to the overall temperature of the device. Since the charge carriers can become trapped in the gate dielectric of a MOS transistor, the switching characteristics of the transistor can be permanently changed. Hot-carrier injection is one of the mechanisms that adversely affects the reliability of semiconductors of solid-state devices.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quantum dot solar cell</span> Type of solar cell based on quantum dot devices

A quantum dot solar cell (QDSC) is a solar cell design that uses quantum dots as the captivating photovoltaic material. It attempts to replace bulk materials such as silicon, copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS) or cadmium telluride (CdTe). Quantum dots have bandgaps that are adjustable across a wide range of energy levels by changing their size. In bulk materials, the bandgap is fixed by the choice of material(s). This property makes quantum dots attractive for multi-junction solar cells, where a variety of materials are used to improve efficiency by harvesting multiple portions of the solar spectrum.

Bismuth ferrite (BiFeO3, also commonly referred to as BFO in materials science) is an inorganic chemical compound with perovskite structure and one of the most promising multiferroic materials. The room-temperature phase of BiFeO3 is classed as rhombohedral belonging to the space group R3c. It is synthesized in bulk and thin film form and both its antiferromagnetic (G type ordering) Néel temperature (approximately 653 K) and ferroelectric Curie temperature are well above room temperature (approximately 1100K). Ferroelectric polarization occurs along the pseudocubic direction () with a magnitude of 90–95 μC/cm2.

Surface photovoltage (SPV) measurements are a widely used method to determine the minority carrier diffusion length of semiconductors. Since the transport of minority carriers determines the behavior of the p-n junctions that are ubiquitous in semiconductor devices, surface photovoltage data can be very helpful in understanding their performance. As a contactless method, SPV is a popular technique for characterizing poorly understood compound semiconductors where the fabrication of ohmic contacts or special device structures may be difficult.

In solid-state physics, a metal–semiconductor (M–S) junction is a type of electrical junction in which a metal comes in close contact with a semiconductor material. It is the oldest practical semiconductor device. M–S junctions can either be rectifying or non-rectifying. The rectifying metal–semiconductor junction forms a Schottky barrier, making a device known as a Schottky diode, while the non-rectifying junction is called an ohmic contact.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Organic solar cell</span> Type of photovoltaic

An organic solar cell (OSC) or plastic solar cell is a type of photovoltaic that uses organic electronics, a branch of electronics that deals with conductive organic polymers or small organic molecules, for light absorption and charge transport to produce electricity from sunlight by the photovoltaic effect. Most organic photovoltaic cells are polymer solar cells.

Monocrystalline silicon, often referred to as single-crystal silicon or simply mono-Si, is a critical material widely used in modern electronics and photovoltaics. As the foundation for silicon-based discrete components and integrated circuits, it plays a vital role in virtually all modern electronic equipment, from computers to smartphones. Additionally, mono-Si serves as a highly efficient light-absorbing material for the production of solar cells, making it indispensable in the renewable energy sector.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shockley–Queisser limit</span> Maximum theoretical efficiency of a solar cell

In physics, the radiative efficiency limit is the maximum theoretical efficiency of a solar cell using a single p-n junction to collect power from the cell where the only loss mechanism is radiative recombination in the solar cell. It was first calculated by William Shockley and Hans-Joachim Queisser at Shockley Semiconductor in 1961, giving a maximum efficiency of 30% at 1.1 eV. The limit is one of the most fundamental to solar energy production with photovoltaic cells, and is one of the field's most important contributions.

Two-photon photovoltaic effect is an energy collection method based on two-photon absorption (TPA). The TPP effect can be thought of as the nonlinear equivalent of the traditional photovoltaic effect involving high optical intensities. This effect occurs when two photons are absorbed at the same time resulting in an electron-hole pair.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Amorphous silicon</span> Non-crystalline silicon

Amorphous silicon (a-Si) is the non-crystalline form of silicon used for solar cells and thin-film transistors in LCDs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Solaristor</span> Self-powered phototransistor

A solaristor is a compact two-terminal self-powered phototransistor. The two-in-one transistor plus solar cell achieves the high-low current modulation by a memresistive effect in the flow of photogenerated carriers. The term was coined by Dr Amador Perez-Tomas working in collaboration with other ICN2 researchers in 2018 when they demonstrated the concept in a ferroelectric-oxide/organic bulk heterojunction solar cell.

Electroreflectance is the change of reflectivity of a solid due to the influence of an electric field close to, or at the interface of the solid with a liquid. The change in reflectivity is most noticeable at very specific ranges of photon energy, corresponding to the band gaps at critical points of the Brillouin zone.

In solid-state physics, band bending refers to the process in which the electronic band structure in a material curves up or down near a junction or interface. It does not involve any physical (spatial) bending. When the electrochemical potential of the free charge carriers around an interface of a semiconductor is dissimilar, charge carriers are transferred between the two materials until an equilibrium state is reached whereby the potential difference vanishes. The band bending concept was first developed in 1938 when Mott, Davidov and Schottky all published theories of the rectifying effect of metal-semiconductor contacts. The use of semiconductor junctions sparked the computer revolution in the second half of the 20th century. Devices such as the diode, the transistor, the photocell and many more play crucial roles in technology.

References

  1. S.Y. Yang; J. Seidel; S.J. Byrnes; P. Shafer; C.-H. Yang; M.D. Rossell; et al. (2010). "Above-bandgap voltages from ferroelectric photovoltaic devices" (PDF). Nature Nanotechnology. 5 (2): 143–7. Bibcode:2010NatNa...5..143Y. doi:10.1038/nnano.2009.451. PMID   20062051. S2CID   16970573.
  2. 1 2 3 4 V.M. Fridkin (2001). "Bulk photovoltaic effect in noncentrosymmetric crystals". Crystallography Reports. 46 (4): 654–658. Bibcode:2001CryRp..46..654F. doi:10.1134/1.1387133. S2CID   98554369.
  3. October 24, 2024, scitechdaily.com: Shattering Efficiency Limits: New Material Outperforms Traditional Solar Cells Quote: "...The impressive conversion efficiency achieved in their α-In2Se3 device represents a significant step forward for next-generation solar cell technologies and photosensors....Most importantly, the researchers gauged the potential of the BPV effect in α-In2Se3 and compared it to that in other materials. “Our α-In2Se3 device demonstrated a quantum efficiency several orders of magnitude higher than other ferroelectric materials, and a comparable one to that of low-dimensional materials with enhanced electric polarization,” remarks Prof. Urakami. He further adds, “This discovery will guide material selection for the development of functional photovoltaic devices in the near future.”..."
  4. 1 2 Starkiewicz J., Sosnowski L., Simpson O. (1946). "Photovoltaic Effects Exhibited in High-resistance Semi-conducting Films". Nature. 158 (4001): 28. Bibcode:1946Natur.158...28S. doi: 10.1038/158028a0 . S2CID   4109726.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  5. Goldstein, B.; Pensak, L. (1959). "High‐Voltage Photovoltaic Effect". Journal of Applied Physics. 30 (2): 155–161. Bibcode:1959JAP....30..155G. doi:10.1063/1.1735125.
  6. 1 2 H. Kallmann, B. Kramer, E. Haidenmanakis, W. J. McAleer, H. Barkemeyer, and P. I. Pollak, J. Electrochem. Soc. 108, 247 (1961).
  7. Pal, U.; Saha, S.; Chaudhuri, A. K.; Banerjee, H. (1991). "The anomalous photovoltaic effect in polycrystalline zinc telluride films". Journal of Applied Physics. 69 (9): 6547–6555. Bibcode:1991JAP....69.6547P. doi:10.1063/1.348865.
  8. M. D. Uspenskii, N. G. Ivanova, and I. E. Malkis, Sov. Phys.- Semicond. 1, 1059 (1968).
  9. E. I. Adirovich and L. M. Gol'Dshtein, Sov. Phys. Dokl. 9, 795 (1965).
  10. Reuter Herbert, Schmitt Heinz (1995). "Anomalous photovoltaic effect and negative photoconductivity in thin, amorphous GaAs‐Si films". Journal of Applied Physics. 77 (7): 3209–3218. Bibcode:1995JAP....77.3209R. doi:10.1063/1.358674.
  11. Levi Aharoni, Hadar; Azulay, Doron; Millo, Oded; Balberg, Isaac (2008). "Anomalous photovoltaic effect in nanocrystalline Si/SiO2 composites". Applied Physics Letters. 92 (11): 112109. Bibcode:2008ApPhL..92k2109L. doi:10.1063/1.2897294. ISSN   0003-6951.
  12. J. I. Pankove, Optical Processes in Semiconductors, (Dover Publications, New York, 1975).
  13. 1 2 Johnson H R (1975). "The anomalous photovoltaic effect in cadmium telluride". Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 8 (13): 1530–1541. Bibcode:1975JPhD....8.1530J. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/8/13/015. S2CID   250772486.
  14. V. M. Lyubin and G. A. Fedorova, Sov. Phys. Dokl. 135, 1343 (1960).
  15. G. Brincourt and S. Martinuzzi, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 266, 1283 (1968).
  16. S. M. Ryvkin, Photoelectric Effects in Semiconductors, page 296, (Consultants Bureau, New York, 1964).
  17. V.I. Belincher; B.I. Sturman (1980). "The photogalvanic effect in media lacking a center of symmetry" (PDF). Sov. Phys. Usp. 23 (3): 199. Bibcode:1980SvPhU..23..199B. doi:10.1070/PU1980v023n03ABEH004703.
  18. 1 2 A. M. Glass; D. von der Linde; T. J. Negran (1974). "High‐voltage bulk photovoltaic effect and the photorefractive process in LiNbO3". Applied Physics Letters. 25 (4): 233. Bibcode:1974ApPhL..25..233G. doi:10.1063/1.1655453.
  19. 1 2 3 W.T.H. Koch; R. Munser; W. Ruppel; P. Würfel (October 1975). "Bulk photovoltaic effect in BaTiO3". Solid State Communications. 17 (7): 847–850. Bibcode:1975SSCom..17..847K. doi:10.1016/0038-1098(75)90735-8.
  20. 1 2 S. M. Young & A. M. Rappe (2012). "First Principles Calculation of the Shift Current Photovoltaic Effect in Ferroelectrics" (PDF). Physical Review Letters. 109 (11): 116601. arXiv: 1202.3168 . Bibcode:2012PhRvL.109k6601Y. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.116601. PMID   23005660. S2CID   13710483.
  21. 1 2 Ralph von Baltz & Wolfgang Kraut (1981). "Theory of the bulk photovoltaic effect in pure crystals". Physical Review B. 23 (10): 5590–5596. Bibcode:1981PhRvB..23.5590V. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.23.5590.