Australian light destroyer project

Last updated

DDL from Navy News September 72.jpg
An artist's impression of the light destroyer design as approved by the Government in August 1972
Class overview
BuildersWilliamstown Naval Dockyard (planned)
OperatorsNaval Ensign of Australia.svg  Royal Australian Navy (planned)
Preceded by Daring-class destroyer and early River-class destroyer escort
Succeeded by Adelaide-class frigate
Built1975–1984 (planned)
In commission1980 (planned)
Planned10 originally, later 3
Completed0
General characteristics
Type Light destroyer
Displacement4,200 tons
Length425 ft (129.5 m)
Beam48 ft (14.6 m)
PropulsionTwo shafts each with one Rolls-Royce Olympus and one Rolls-Royce Tyne gas turbine [1]
Speed30 knots (56 km/h; 35 mph)
RangeUp to 6,000 mi (9,700 km) [2]
Complement210
Sensors and
processing systems
Automated combat data system [1]
Armament
Aircraft carriedTwo helicopters
Aviation facilitiesHangar and stern flight deck
NotesShip characteristics from Gillett (1988), p. 68 [3]

The Australian light destroyer project aimed to build a class of small destroyers for the Royal Australian Navy (RAN). The project began in 1966 with the goal of developing simple light destroyers (DDL) to support patrol boat operations. The project was rescoped in 1969 when the Navy decided to use the ships to replace other destroyers as they retired, leading to an increase in the design's size and complexity. The construction of three DDLs was approved in 1972. Concerns over the ships' cost and technological risk led the government to cancel the DDL project in 1973 on the RAN's advice, and a variant of the United States' Oliver Hazard Perry-class frigate was procured instead.

Contents

Requirement

From 1963 to 1966, RAN warships took part in the Indonesian Confrontation. During this period, Australian minesweepers and frigates patrolled Malaysia's coastline to counter Indonesian infiltration parties travelling in small craft. These ships also bombarded Indonesian positions in East Kalimantan near the border with Malaysia on several occasions. The RAN's experiences during this conflict led it to perceive a need for light destroyers and patrol boats tailored to Confrontation-type tasks. [4]

When the DDL project began in 1966, the ships' role was to support patrol boats during anti-infiltration operations and complement the Navy's existing destroyer force. The intention was that the DDLs would be fast, simply armed and smaller than conventional destroyers. [5] It was also hoped that a common DDL hull design could be used to produce variants optimised for different roles. [6] The RAN and British Royal Navy (RN) held discussions in 1967 on jointly developing DDLs, but the RN withdrew from the project when the Australians insisted on arming the ships with United States-designed weapons. [3] [5]

The DDL design evolved during the late 1960s. As a result of planning conducted during 1967 and 1968, it gradually became clear that the ships would replace rather than complement the Navy's three Daring-class destroyers and four early River-class destroyer escorts. [3] [5] Accordingly, it was specified in 1969 that the DDLs would be more capable and flexible than originally conceived, allowing the RAN to maintain its capabilities as the older destroyers retired. The intended roles for the DDLs' were set in 1970 by an agreement between the RAN and Department of Defence, which specified that the ships were to be capable of destroying equivalent surface warships, carrying out maritime interdiction duties, commanding groups of patrol boats and aircraft, have reasonable anti-aircraft and anti-submarine capabilities and be able to provide naval gunfire support to land forces. [5]

The RAN originally intended to order up to ten DDLs. [3] All the ships were to be built in Australia to maintain local shipbuilding capabilities, and Australian industry was to be involved to the greatest possible extent. [7] Production of the ships was to be evenly split between Cockatoo Island Dockyard in Sydney and Williamstown Naval Dockyard in Melbourne. [8]

Design

The DDL design changed considerably over the life of the project. The initial specification was for a 1,000-ton escort vessel [9] and in an early design the class was to have a single 5-inch (127 mm) gun as its primary armament and carry a helicopter. [6] When the Navy Office later prepared an initial sketch design it was for a 2,100-ton ship with a length of 335 feet (102.1 m), a beam of 40 feet (12.2 m) and a 32-knot (59 km/h; 37 mph) maximum speed. These DDLs were to be armed with two five-inch guns and operate a single light helicopter. [10]

After preparing its initial sketch design, the Navy contracted Yarrow Admiralty Research Division (Y-ARD) in July 1970 to complete preliminary designs for the DDLs. As an initial stage, Y-ARD was required to develop sketch designs for six different armament configurations using a common hull. [5] Requests for tender for studies on major sub-components were also issued in 1970, and these were completed by mid-1971. [11] [12]

The RAN conducted armament effectiveness studies of each of the six DDL variants in parallel with Y-ARD's development of the designs. These studies found that including an area air defence capability and an ability to operate two helicopters greatly improved the DDL's effectiveness. As a result, these features were included in the Navy's specification for the DDL design which was issued in late 1970. [13] By this time the design had evolved to specify a general-purpose destroyer of 4,200 tons, armed with a five-inch gun and a Tartar missile launcher, and capable of operating two helicopters. The changes increased the cost of building the ships, and the number planned was reduced to three. [11] Nevertheless, the DDL design was considered likely to result in very capable ships, with the 1972–73 edition of Jane's Fighting Ships commenting favourably. [7] [14]

The changes to the DDL design reflected shifting requirements and poor project management by the Navy. [9] The development of an Australian-designed ship customised for Australian conditions caused naval officers to include requirements beyond those which were essential. [12] These changes were made without regard for costs, as the team tasked with developing the specifications was not also responsible for the ships' final price and delivery schedule. [15] The Navy's failure to maintain control of the design requirements and make cost-performance trade-offs may have been due to its limited experience in overseeing the design of new warships. [12]

Cancellation

Minister for Defence Lance Barnard in 1973. Barnard criticised the DDL project when he was the Shadow Minister for Defence, and cancelled it on the advice of the navy after the Australian Labor Party came to power. Lance Barnard 1973 (1).jpg
Minister for Defence Lance Barnard in 1973. Barnard criticised the DDL project when he was the Shadow Minister for Defence, and cancelled it on the advice of the navy after the Australian Labor Party came to power.

Despite the changes to the design and its growing costs, construction of three DDLs was approved by the Liberal Party McMahon government in August 1972. [3] [12] At this time, the total project cost was estimated at A$355 million; this figure included all costs associated with building three ships and operating them for ten years. The ships themselves were expected to cost approximately $210 million. [16] [17] All three ships were to be built at Williamstown Dockyard, with construction of the first ship beginning in 1975, followed by the other ships at two-yearly intervals. [9] The initial DDL was to be commissioned in 1980, and the third in 1984. [3] Further DDLs may also have been ordered over time to replace the Navy's destroyers as they reached the end of their service lives. [18] [19]

The DDL design was not supported by the Australian Labor Party (ALP) opposition, which believed that the ships would be too large and expensive for escort, patrol and surveillance duties. [20] In June 1972 The Australian Quarterly published an article by the shadow minister for Defence, Lance Barnard, in which he argued that "the DDL concept goes completely against trends in the development of vessels for maritime warfare", and that the high cost of the warships would mean that not enough would be purchased to meet the RAN's requirements. Barnard suggested that if the DDL project was cancelled the RAN's needs could be met at a lower cost by selecting from one of several existing foreign designs for smaller, but just as well armed, destroyers and building these ships under licence in Australia. [21] [22] The Minister for the Navy, Malcolm Mackay, rejected Barnard's criticisms in August 1972 and stated that studies carried out by the Navy and Department of Defence had found that smaller and less heavily armed ships would not be able to fill the roles intended for the DDLs. [19]

Barnard became Minister for Defence following the election of the ALP Whitlam government in December 1972. He directed in January 1973 that the DDL project be reviewed. This review considered the feasibility of the project, including its budget and timeline, as well as the suitability of comparable American, British and Dutch warships. [23]

Increasing costs and concerns over the ships' design led to the cancellation of the DDL project. The Department of Defence observed that the DDL's costs were escalating and it was unable to finalise the design. The Navy also reviewed the project and found that it was unduly expensive, and a joint parliamentary committee concluded that a unique Australian design entailed significant technological risks. [24] As a result, the Navy recommended to the Government that the DDL project be cancelled, and this took place in August 1973. [12] The cost of the project to the Navy had been A$1.7 million, most of which was spent on design investigations and management consultancies. [25] The opposition Liberal Party disagreed with the decision to cancel the DDLs. [26]

Aftermath

The DDL project's problems harmed the Australian shipbuilding industry. The cancellation of both the DDLs and another project to develop an Australian fast combat support ship design led to a perception that technical risks needed to be minimised when selecting new warships, and it was preferable to rely on proven foreign designs. [8] [27] Australian industry was also left with a bad impression as companies involved in the project had devoted considerable resources to preparing tenders for the DDL. [28] Y-ARD greatly reduced its presence in Australia, and the Australian naval design experts it had employed were offered jobs in the United Kingdom. [17]

The British Type 42 was one of the designs considered after the DDL project was cancelled HMS Coventry (D118) underway in the Atlantic Ocean, circa in 1981 (6417242).jpg
The British Type 42 was one of the designs considered after the DDL project was cancelled

Despite cancelling the DDL project, the government endorsed the RAN's requirement for new destroyer-type warships and requested a review of existing foreign designs to find a replacement. [29] The process of evaluating new designs was managed by what had been the DDL project office, and in line with the government's priorities it initially focused on selecting affordable warships of a proven design for further consideration. [30] A large number of designs were studied by the project office, and the United States' Oliver Hazard Perry-class frigates and a variant of the British Type 42 destroyer armed with SM-1 surface to air missiles were eventually short listed for detailed evaluation. [29] [31] The project team found that the Type 42 was the only design capable of meeting the Navy's requirement, and stated that the Oliver Hazard Perry class was "a second rate escort that falls short of the DDL requirements on virtually every respect". Despite this, there were serious concerns over whether it would be possible to fit SM-1 missiles to the Type 42. This led the government to approve the purchase of two Oliver Hazard Perry-class ships from the United States in April 1974. [29]

The United States' Oliver Hazard Perry class was the other option to replace the DDL project, and the design selected by the Australians. USS Oliver Hazard Perry FFG-7.jpg
The United States' Oliver Hazard Perry class was the other option to replace the DDL project, and the design selected by the Australians.

The DDL project was reviewed again when the Liberal Fraser government came into office in late 1975. The review panel unanimously advised the new Minister for Defence James Killen that the DDL project was no longer viable as the total cost of the ships would be about $130 million higher than the Oliver Hazard Perry project, and it would take three years longer for the DDLs to be completed. Killen accepted this advice, and a firm order for two Oliver Hazard Perry frigates was placed in February 1976. A third ship was ordered in late 1977. [26] [29]

Six of these frigates, which were designated the Adelaide-class frigate, were eventually ordered, and the final two were built in Australia at Williamstown. [32] The expertise of the DDL project office and the preparations which had been undertaken to manage the process of ordering and building the ships contributed to the Navy's ability to rapidly evaluate alternative designs and oversee their entry into service once an order was placed. [33] The last of the Adelaide-class frigates were retired from the RAN in 2019. Two of the type were later sold to the Chilean Navy. [34]

Related Research Articles

<i>Oliver Hazard Perry</i>-class frigate Class of guided-missile frigates

The Oliver Hazard Perry class is a class of guided-missile frigates named after U.S. Commodore Oliver Hazard Perry, a commander noted for his role in the Battle of Lake Erie. Also known as the Perry or FFG-7 class, the warships were designed in the United States in the mid-1970s as general-purpose escort vessels inexpensive enough to be bought in large numbers to replace World War II-era destroyers and complement 1960s-era Knox-class frigates.

HMAS <i>Darwin</i> (FFG 04) Adelaide-class frigate

HMAS Darwin, named for the capital city of the Northern Territory, was an Adelaide-class guided-missile frigate, formerly in service with the Royal Australian Navy (RAN). One of four ships ordered from the United States, Darwin entered service in 1984. During her career, she has operated in the Persian Gulf, as part of the INTERFET peacekeeping taskforce, and off the Solomon Islands. The frigate underwent a major upgrade during 2007 and 2008. She was decommissioned on 9 December 2017 and was supposed to be scuttled as a dive wreck in Tasmania, but the deal was pulled by the Tasmanian Government and her fate remains uncertain.

HMAS <i>Newcastle</i> Adelaide-class frigate

HMAS Newcastle, named for the city of Newcastle, New South Wales, the largest provincial city in Australia, was an Adelaide-class guided-missile frigate. The last ship of the class to be constructed, Newcastle entered service with the Royal Australian Navy in 1993. During her career, the frigate has operated as part of the INTERFET peacekeeping taskforce, served in the Persian Gulf, and responded to the 2006 Fijian coup d'état. The frigate was decommissioned on 30 June 2019 and transferred to the Chilean Navy on 15 April 2020 and renamed as Capitán Prat.

HMAS <i>Quiberon</i> (G81) Australian royal navy ship

HMAS Quiberon (G81/D20/D281/F03) was a Q-class destroyer of the Royal Australian Navy (RAN). Although built for the Royal Navy and remaining British property until 1950, Quiberon was one of two Q-class destroyers commissioned into the RAN during World War II. She was passed into full RAN ownership in 1950, and converted into an anti-submarine frigate.

HMAS <i>Queenborough</i>

HMAS Queenborough (G70/D270/F02/57) was a Q-class destroyer that served in the Royal Navy (RN) and Royal Australian Navy (RAN).

Type 21 frigate Class of general purpose frigates built for Royal Navy

The Type 21 frigate, or Amazon-class frigate, was a British Royal Navy general-purpose escort that was designed in the late 1960s, built in the 1970s and served throughout the 1980s into the 1990s.

HMAS <i>Adelaide</i> (FFG 01) Frigate of the Royal Australian Navy, lead ship of the class

HMAS Adelaide was the lead ship of the Adelaide class of guided missile frigates built for the Royal Australian Navy (RAN), based on the United States Navy's Oliver Hazard Perry-class frigates. She was built in the United States and commissioned into the RAN in 1980.

<i>Anzac</i>-class frigate Australian military ship class

The Anzac class is a ship class of ten frigates; eight operated by the Royal Australian Navy (RAN) and two operated by the Royal New Zealand Navy (RNZN). During the 1980s, the RAN began plans to replace the River-class destroyer escorts with a mid-capability patrol frigate and settled on the idea of modifying a proven German design for Australian conditions. Around the same time, the RNZN was seeking to replace their Leander-class frigates while maintaining blue-water capabilities. A souring of relations between New Zealand and the United States of America in relation to New Zealand's nuclear-free zone and the ANZUS security treaty prompted New Zealand to seek improved ties with other nations, particularly Australia. As both nations were seeking warships of similar capabilities, the decision was made in 1987 to collaborate on their acquisition. The project name is taken from the Australian and New Zealand Army Corps of the First World War.

HMAS <i>Parramatta</i> (FFH 154) Anzac-class frigate of the Royal Australian Navy

HMAS Parramatta is an Anzac-class frigate of the Royal Australian Navy (RAN). One of ten warships built for the RAN and Royal New Zealand Navy (RNZN) based on the MEKO 200 design, Parramatta was laid down in 1999, launched in 2003, and commissioned into the RAN in 2003. During her career, the frigate has been deployed to the Middle East on several occasions. In early 2015, Parramatta was docked to undergo the Anti-Ship Missile Defence (ASMD) upgrade. She completed these upgrades in April 2016.

HMAS <i>Stuart</i> (FFH 153) Anzac-class frigate of the Royal Australian Navy

HMAS Stuart is an Anzac-class frigate of the Royal Australian Navy (RAN). She was built at Williamstown in Victoria, and commissioned into the RAN in 2002. The frigate is operational as of 2021.

HMAS <i>Sydney</i> (FFG 03)

HMAS Sydney was an Adelaide-class guided-missile frigate of the Royal Australian Navy (RAN). The frigate was one of six modified Oliver Hazard Perry-class frigates ordered from 1977 onwards, and the third of four to be constructed in the United States of America. Laid down and launched in 1980, Sydney was named for the capital city of New South Wales, and commissioned into the RAN in 1983.

HMAS <i>Perth</i> (FFH 157) Anzac-class frigate of Royal Australian Navy

HMAS Perth is an Anzac-class frigate of the Royal Australian Navy (RAN). The last ship of the class to be completed, she was built by Tenix Defence and commissioned into the RAN in 2006. In 2007, Perth became the first major warship of the RAN to be commanded by a woman. During 2010 and 2011, the frigate was used as the testbed for a major upgrade to the Anzac class' ability to defend themselves from anti-ship missiles.

HMAS <i>Ballarat</i> (FFH 155) Anzac-class frigate of Royal Australian Navy

HMAS Ballarat is an Anzac-class frigate of the Royal Australian Navy (RAN). The frigate was laid down in 2000 and commissioned into the RAN in mid-2004. Since entering service, Ballarat has been involved in border protection as part of Operation Relex II, was deployed to the Gulf for Operation Catalyst, and was one of the two ships involved in the Operation Northern Trident 2009 round-the-world voyage. Ballarat has undergone the Anti-Ship Missile Defence (ASMD) upgrade, completing in 2015.

HMAS <i>Melbourne</i> (FFG 05) Adelaide-class guided missile frigate of the Royal Australian Navy

HMAS Melbourne was an Adelaide-class guided-missile frigate of the Royal Australian Navy, which entered service in 1992. Melbourne has been deployed to the Persian Gulf on several occasions, and served as part of the INTERFET peacekeeping taskforce in 2000. On 26 October 2019, Melbourne was decommissioned from the RAN, subsequently being transferred to Chile. The ship was commissioned into the Chilean Navy as Almirante Latorre on 15 April 2020.

HMAS <i>Canberra</i> (FFG 02) Guided missile frigate

HMAS Canberra was an Adelaide class guided missile frigate of the Royal Australian Navy (RAN). Based on the Oliver Hazard Perry class design, Canberra was one of four Adelaide class ships constructed in the United States of America, and one of six to serve in the RAN.

<i>Hobart</i>-class destroyer Class of destroyer of Royal Australian Navy

The Hobart class is a ship class of three air warfare destroyers (AWDs) built for the Royal Australian Navy (RAN). Planning for ships to replace the Adelaide-class frigates and restore the capability last exhibited by the Perth-class destroyers began by 2000, initially under acquisition project SEA 1400, which was re-designated SEA 4000. Although the designation "Air Warfare Destroyer" is used to describe ships dedicated to the defence of a naval force from aircraft and missile attack, the destroyers are expected to also operate in anti-surface, anti-submarine, and naval gunfire support roles.

The Royal Australian Navy, although a significant force in the Asia-Pacific region, is nonetheless classed as a medium-sized navy. Its fleet is based around two main types of surface combatant, with limited global deployment and air power capability. However, in 2009, a white paper, Defending Australia in the Asia Pacific Century: Force 2030, was produced by the Australian government which set out a programme of defence spending that will see significant improvements to the RAN's fleet and capabilities.

<i>Adelaide</i>-class frigate Class of Australian guided missile frigates

The Adelaide class of six guided missile frigates was constructed in Australia and the United States for service in the Royal Australian Navy. Two were later sold to the Chilean Navy. The Adelaide class was based on the United States Navy's Oliver Hazard Perry-class frigates, but modified for Australian requirements. The first four vessels were built in the United States, and the final two were constructed in Australia. The first ship entered service in November 1980.

<i>Perth</i>-class destroyer Destroyer class of the Royal Australian Navy

The Perth-class destroyers were three modified Charles F. Adams-class guided missile destroyers operated by the Royal Australian Navy (RAN). Ordered from Defoe Shipbuilding Company during 1962 and 1963, HMA Ships Perth, Hobart, and Brisbane were the first guided missiled-armed warships, and the first naval ships of United States design, to enter service with the RAN. All three ships operated during the Vietnam War, while Brisbane also participated in the Gulf War. The class was decommissioned between 1999 and 2001, with all three vessels later sunk as dive wrecks.

In February 2024, the Australian Government announced a program to acquire eleven general purpose frigates for the Royal Australian Navy (RAN). These warships form part of a plan to expand the RAN and will, along with the larger Hunter-class frigates, replace its Anzac-class frigates.

References

Citations

  1. 1 2 3 4 Killen (1976), p. 34
  2. Loxton (1973), p. 21
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Gillett (1988), p. 68
  4. Cooper (2006), pp. 198–200
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 Loxton (1973), p. 17
  6. 1 2 Cooper (2006), p. 200
  7. 1 2 Schaetzel (1986), p. 16
  8. 1 2 Jeremy (2006), p. 201
  9. 1 2 3 Jones (2006), p. 219.
  10. Jeremy (2005), p. 176
  11. 1 2 Jeremy (2005), p. 177
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 Earnshaw (1999), p. 90
  13. Loxton (1973), pp. 17–19
  14. Blackman (1972), p. 21
  15. Senate Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee (2006), p. 43
  16. Willis (1972), p. 26
  17. 1 2 Cranston, Frank (24 September 1973). "DDL team to be withdrawn". The Canberra Times. National Library of Australia. p. 6. Retrieved 9 March 2015.
  18. Earnshaw (1999), p. 89
  19. 1 2 Cranston, Frank (17 August 1972). "Smaller ships 'no DDL substitute'". The Canberra Times. National Library of Australia. p. 3. Retrieved 10 March 2015.
  20. Earnshaw (1999), p. 91
  21. Cranston, Frank (16 August 1972). "Light destroyer idea challenged". The Canberra Times. National Library of Australia. p. 2. Retrieved 9 March 2015.
  22. Barnard (1972), p. 17
  23. Cranston, Frank (17 January 1973). "$355m navy plan under review". The Canberra Times. National Library of Australia. p. 3. Retrieved 9 March 2015.
  24. Senate Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee (2006), pp. 42–43
  25. "Effect on the Navy" (PDF). Navy News. Royal Australian Navy. 31 August 1973. p. 2. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 March 2011. Retrieved 22 March 2009.
  26. 1 2 "Australia to buy US warships". The Canberra Times. ACT: National Library of Australia. 19 February 1976. p. 11. Retrieved 9 March 2015.
  27. Jeremy (2005), p. 178
  28. Schaetzel (1986), p. 17
  29. 1 2 3 4 Jones (2006), p. 220
  30. Berlyn and Hurt (1981), p. 13
  31. Berlyn and Hurt (1981), p. 14
  32. Jones (2006), p. 224
  33. Berlyn and Hurt (1981), pp. 20–21
  34. Nicholson, Dylan (24 April 2020). "Ex-RAN Adelaide Class frigates commissioned with Chilean Navy". Defence Connect. Retrieved 20 February 2024.

Bibliography

Further reading