Basil of Seleucia

Last updated

Basil of Seleucia was a Roman[ clarification needed ] Bishop and ecclesiastical writer. [1] He was archbishop of Seleucia ad Calycadnum by 448. He condemned Eutyches in the year 448, "acquiesced" while "rehabilitating" at the Latrocinium in 449, "but recanted and signed" the Tome of Leo in 450. [2]

Contents

Biography

His date of birth is uncertain but probably around the turn of the 5th century; he was consecrated bishop by 448, a position he held for at least a decade. Basil was a notable figure during the period when the Eastern Church was convulsed by the Eutychian controversy, and was necessarily obliged to take sides in all the attendant disputes. Those of his writings which have come down to us, though perhaps too rhetorical and involved, suggest that he was a man of great literary ability. [1]

He was appointed Bishop of Seleucia in Isauria, between the years 432 and 447, and was one of those who took part in the Synod of Constantinople, which was summoned in 448 by Patriarch Flavian of Constantinople [1] to assess the faith of the archimandrite Eutyches. Although in Constantinople he accepted Eutyches' condemnation, he attended the Second Council of Ephesus the next year (449), where he voted for the rehabilitation of Eutyches and for the deposition of the Patriarch of Constantinople. Later, at Chalcedon, he claimed that he had felt obliged to submit to the authority of the other bishops at Ephesus, particularly Dioscurus of Alexandria. [3]

Like many who had submitted to Dioscurus at Ephesus, he went on to accept the condemnation of both Eutyches and Dioscurus at Chalcedon. Throughout the turmoil, however, his personal confession remained consistent: the one Christ is fully human and fully divine, and either 'one nature' or 'two nature' language is orthodox if rightly understood. [4] He is particularly notable for originating the qualified Dyophysite formula promulgated in the Chalcedonian definition: 'made known in two natures'. [5] After Chalcedon, he seems to have continued a zealous opponent of the Miaphysite party, and in the year 458 he joined with his fellow-bishops of Isauria, in an appeal to the Emperor Leo I, requesting him to use his influence in forwarding the Decrees of Chalcedon, and in securing the deposition of Timotheus Aelurus, who had intruded himself in 457 into the Patriarchate of Alexandria. This is the last reference we find to Basil and it is commonly supposed that he died shortly afterwards, probably between 458 and 460, although Oxford cites his death at after 468. [1]

Theology

Basil was a staunch anti-Nestorian, stressing the real union of the two natures of the incarnate Logos whereby "God the Word was incarnate of the Virgin." [6] : 72 

Mariology

In the well-known homily On the Annunciation now generally recognised as authentic [6] : 71-72  (for discussion of which, see 'Writings' below), Basil bears witness to a highly developed Marian theology. Written in the highly-charged theological climate after the Council of Ephesus, the homiletic hymn is of a devotional nature, bearing witness to the blossoming of Mariologial thought. True to form with his Christological convictions, he affirms the divine maternity and title of Theotokos, intertwined with the mystery of the incarnation. O'Carroll notes that "he cannot praise the Theotokos fittingly", declaring that she is the temple truly worthy of God, and "shines above all the martyrs as the sun outshines the stars", [6] : 72  language consistent with earlier contemporaries like Proclus and Cyril. Likewise, Basil makes use of salutatory invocations beginning with Χαῖρε ("Hail") [7] which would become a mainstay of Marian devotion in subsequent centuries.

O'Carroll additionally observes that Basil "marks an advance" over previous theologians in his teachings on Marian intercession, wherein the bishop sets forth a clear understanding of the Virgin's mediatorial capacity, and strongly links it with her divine motherhood. In so doing, he applies Christo-centric theological language to the Virgin in a secondary manner. Basil acclaims her "set as Mediatress of God and men that the dividing element of hatred might be taken away and heavenly and earthly [things] be made one." This helped standardise language and concepts for the medieval Marian doctrine of intercession grounded in her role as Mother of God. [6] : 72  Her mediatorial role in Basil's theology, Reynolds says, is intrinsically linked to the incarnation and is not explicitly said to involve ongoing mediation. At the same time, his direct invocation of the Theotokos with royal appelations and a plethora of praises of her exalted status suggests a developing understanding of such a capacity on the Virgin's part. Reynolds identifies him as the first person known to have used the term Mediatrix, [8] a short while before Antipater of Bostra. For Basil, Mary is the one "through whom the angels are rightly glorified," the one "[through whom] the rule of death is destroyed", among many other appellations. Limberis observes that Basil's hymnic oration "reflect[s] the growth of the cult of the Theotokos, sanctioned by the bishops, incorporated into the liturgical cycle of the year." [7]

Writings

Forty-one sermons (logoi) on different portions of the Old Testament have come down to us under his name, and are found in Migne, [9] where is also his history of the protomartyr Thecla and of the miracles wrought at her grave. [10] Most of these sermons may be regarded as genuine, though some of them are now generally assigned to Nestorius. [1]

Perhaps the most significant of the works ascribed to Basil is Homily XXXIX On the Annunciation of the most holy Mother of God. B Marx argued against its authenticity, instead assigning it to Proclus of Constantinople. Cunningham agrees that it is spurious but rejects this association in favour of anonymity, dating it to the early 6th century. [11] : 78–81  Nevertheless, in his extensive assessment of the arguments, R Caro accepts the work as authentic and O'Carroll assigns its precise provenance to Constantinople in 449. [6] : 71-72  Likewise, Tevel affirms its authenticity. [12] : 78  Peltomaa is unconvinced of any attribution but agrees with a date preceding the Council of Chalcedon [12] : 77-85 , and uses the text in her argument for a 5th century dating of the Akathist hymn; she cites the work of de Matons who argued that the hymn was dependent both on Romanos the Melodist and his sources, including Basil. [12] : 46,51  Cunningham concedes that the majority of scholars are in agreement on a mid-5th century date. [11] : 80 

According to Photius, Basil also dealt in verse with the life and miracles of Saint Thecla. [1] [13] This, however, was a poem and is not the same as the prose Life and Miracles of Saint Thecla . on the basis of the lack of theological content to indicate a late date,

Related Research Articles

The Chalcedonian Definition is the declaration of the dyophysitism of Christ's nature, adopted at the Council of Chalcedon in AD 451. Chalcedon was an early centre of Christianity located in Asia Minor. The council was the fourth of the ecumenical councils that are accepted by Chalcedonian churches which include the Catholic and Orthodox churches.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Council of Chalcedon</span> 451 Christian ecumenical council

The Council of Chalcedon was the fourth ecumenical council of the Christian Church. It was convoked by the Roman emperor Marcian. The council convened in the city of Chalcedon, Bithynia from 8 October to 1 November 451. The council was attended by over 520 bishops or their representatives, making it the largest and best-documented of the first seven ecumenical councils. The principal purpose of the council was to re-assert the teachings of the ecumenical Council of Ephesus against the teachings of Eutyches and Nestorius. Such doctrines viewed Christ's divine and human natures as separate (Nestorianism) or viewed Christ as solely divine (monophysitism).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cyril of Alexandria</span> Patriarch of Alexandria from 412 to 444

Cyril of Alexandria was the Patriarch of Alexandria from 412 to 444. He was enthroned when the city was at the height of its influence and power within the Roman Empire. Cyril wrote extensively and was a major player in the Christological controversies of the late-4th and 5th centuries. He was a central figure in the Council of Ephesus in 431, which led to the deposition of Nestorius as Patriarch of Constantinople. Cyril is counted among the Church Fathers and also as a Doctor of the Church, and his reputation within the Christian world has resulted in his titles Pillar of Faith and Seal of all the Fathers. The Nestorian bishops at their synod at the Council of Ephesus declared him a heretic, labelling him as a "monster, born and educated for the destruction of the church".

<i>Theotokos</i> Title of Mary in Eastern Christianity

Theotokos is a title of Mary, mother of Jesus, used especially in Eastern Christianity. The usual Latin translations are Dei Genitrix or Deipara. Familiar English translations are "Mother of God" or "God-bearer" – but these both have different literal equivalents in Ancient Greek: Μήτηρ Θεοῦ, and Θεοφόρος respectively.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cappadocian Fathers</span> Group of early Christian chaplains

The Cappadocian Fathers, also traditionally known as the Three Cappadocians, were a trio of Byzantine Christian prelates, theologians and monks who helped shape both early Christianity and the monastic tradition. Basil the Great (330–379) was Bishop of Caesarea; Basil's younger brother Gregory of Nyssa was Bishop of Nyssa; and a close friend, Gregory of Nazianzus (329–389), became Patriarch of Constantinople. The Cappadocia region, in modern-day Turkey, was an early site of Christian activity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eutyches</span> Presbyter and archimandrite at Constantinople

Eutyches or Eutyches of Constantinople was a presbyter and archimandrite at Constantinople. He first came to notice in 431 at the First Council of Ephesus, for his vehement opposition to the teachings of Nestorius. At the 448 Synod of Constantinople and the 451 Council of Chalcedon, Eutyches was condemned for having adopted an equally extreme, although opposite view. He himself, however, would reject this interpretation of his thought.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flavian of Constantinople</span> Archbishop of Constantinople

Flavian, sometimes Flavian I, was Archbishop of Constantinople from 446 to 449. He is venerated as a saint and martyr by the Eastern Orthodox Church and the Catholic Church.

Atticus was an archbishop of Constantinople, succeeding to the episcopal throne in March 406. He is known for having been an opponent of John Chrysostom whom he helped depose, and having rebuilt the small church that was located on the site of the later Hagia Sophia. He was an opponent of the Pelagians, which helped increase his popularity among the citizens of Constantinople, and he contributed to the theological framework for the developing cult of the Virgin Mary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Proclus of Constantinople</span> Christian Archbishop

Proclus was the archbishop of Constantinople from 434 until his death. Renowned for his homiletic abilities, Proclus played a central role in the Nestorian controversy. His contributions to the theology of the developing cult of the Virgin Mary place him among the early and foremost Marian theologians. He is venerated as a saint in the Catholic Church, the Eastern Catholic Churches, the Eastern Orthodox Church, and Oriental Orthodoxy.

Ibas was bishop of Edessa and was born in Syria. His name is the Syriac equivalent of "Donatus". He is frequently associated with the growth of Nestorianism, although this assertion is contentious and has been opposed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pope Dioscorus I of Alexandria</span> Head of the Coptic Church from 444 to 454

Dioscorus I, also known as Dioscorus the Great, was the pope of Alexandria and patriarch of the See of St. Mark who was deposed by the Council of Chalcedon in 451. He was recognized as patriarch by the Coptic Church until his death. He died in Gangra, Paphlagonia, in September 454. He is venerated as a saint by the Coptic and other Oriental Orthodox Churches.

Domnus II was the Patriarch of Antioch between 442 and 449 and a friend of the influential Bishop of Cyrrhus, Saint Theodoret.

Miaphysitism is the Christological doctrine that holds Jesus, the Incarnate Word, is fully divine and fully human, in one nature (physis). It is a position held by the Oriental Orthodox Churches. It differs from the Dyophysitism of the Catholic Church, Eastern Orthodox Churches, and the major Protestant denominations as defined by the Council of Chalcedon in 451, which holds that that Jesus is one "person" in two "natures", a divine nature and a human nature.

Eusebius of Dorylaeum was the 5th-century bishop of Dorylaeum, who spoke out against dissident teachings, especially those of Nestorius and Eutyches, during the period of Christological controversy. After succeeding in having them expelled from their positions, Eusebius was himself deposed and only reinstated two years later, after which the doctrine in dispute was more precisely defined.

An Akathist or AcathistHymn is a type of hymn usually recited by Eastern Orthodox and Byzantine Catholic Christians, dedicated to a saint, holy event, or one of the persons of the Holy Trinity. The name derives from the fact that during the chanting of the hymn, or sometimes the whole service, the congregation is expected to remain standing in reverence, without sitting down, except for the aged or infirm.

The Second Council of Ephesus was a Christological church synod in 449 convened by Emperor Theodosius II under the presidency of Pope Dioscorus I of Alexandria. It was intended to be an ecumenical council, and it is accepted as such by the miaphysite churches but was rejected by Chalcedonian Christians. It was explicitly repudiated by the next council, the Council of Chalcedon of 451, recognised as the fourth ecumenical council by Chalcedonian Christians, and it was named the Latrocinium by Pope Leo I; the Chalcedonian churches, particularly the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox communions, continue to accept this designation, while the Oriental Orthodox repudiate it.

Antipater of Bostra was a Greek prelate who served as Metropolitan bishop of Bostra in the Roman province of Arabia and was one of the foremost critics of Origen. He lived in the 5th century AD.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">First seven ecumenical councils</span> Early Christian governance councils

In the history of Christianity, the first seven ecumenical councils include the following: the First Council of Nicaea in 325, the First Council of Constantinople in 381, the Council of Ephesus in 431, the Council of Chalcedon in 451, the Second Council of Constantinople in 553, the Third Council of Constantinople from 680 to 681 and finally, the Second Council of Nicaea in 787. All of the seven councils were convened in what is now the country of Turkey.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Christianity in the 5th century</span>

In the 5th century in Christianity, there were many developments which led to further fracturing of the State church of the Roman Empire. Emperor Theodosius II called two synods in Ephesus, one in 431 and one in 449, that addressed the teachings of Patriarch of Constantinople Nestorius and similar teachings. Nestorius had taught that Christ's divine and human nature were distinct persons, and hence Mary was the mother of Christ but not the mother of God. The Council rejected Nestorius' view causing many churches, centered on the School of Edessa, to a Nestorian break with the imperial church. Persecuted within the Roman Empire, many Nestorians fled to Persia and joined the Sassanid Church thereby making it a center of Nestorianism. By the end of the 5th century, the global Christian population was estimated at 10-11 million. In 451 the Council of Chalcedon was held to clarify the issue further. The council ultimately stated that Christ's divine and human nature were separate but both part of a single entity, a viewpoint rejected by many churches who called themselves miaphysites. The resulting schism created a communion of churches, including the Armenian, Syrian, and Egyptian churches, that is today known as Oriental Orthodoxy. In spite of these schisms, however, the imperial church still came to represent the majority of Christians within the Roman Empire.

Chrysippus of Jerusalem, also known as Chrysippus of Cappadocia, was a Christian priest and ecclesiastical writer who was active during the middle of the 5th century. He is best known as an author of homiletic literature.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 MacCaffrey, James (1907). "Basil of Seleucia"  . In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). Catholic Encyclopedia . Vol. 2. New York: Robert Appleton Company. p. 330.
  2. ↑ "Basil of Seleucia". Oxford Reference. Retrieved 17 April 2018.
  3. ↑ "Acts of the Council of Chalcedon, First Session, 178" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-02-11. Retrieved 2014-03-27.
  4. ↑ "Ibid. 176" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-02-11. Retrieved 2014-03-27. If you say "one nature" after the union without qualification, you imply confusion and mixture; if, however, you add [to the phrase] "enfleshed and made man", and understand taking flesh and becoming man just as the most blessed Cyril did, then you say the same as we do
  5. ↑ "Price and Gaddis, Introduction to the Acts of Chalcedon, p 73" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-02-11. Retrieved 2014-03-27.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 O'Carroll, Michael (2000). Theotokos : a theological encyclopedia of the Blessed Virgin Mary. Wipf and Stock Publishers. ISBN   1-57910-454-1. OCLC   47771920.
  7. 1 2 Valantasis, Richard, ed. (2000-06-19). Religions of Late Antiquity in Practice. Princeton University Press. pp. 360–361. ISBN   978-0-691-05751-4.
  8. ↑ Reynolds, Brian (2012). Gateway to Heaven: Marian Doctrine and Devotion, Image and Typology in the Patristic and Medieval Periods. New City Press. p. 170. ISBN   978-1-56548-449-8.
  9. ↑ Patrologia Graeca , LXXXV, 27-474.
  10. ↑ Patrologia Graeca , LXXXV, 477-618.
  11. 1 2 Cunningham, Mary B. (2021). The Virgin Mary in Byzantium, c.400-1000: Hymns, Homilies and Hagiography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  12. 1 2 3 Leena Mari, Peltomaa (2001). The Image of the Virgin Mary in the Akathistos Hymn. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. ISBN   90-04-12088-2.
  13. ↑ Photius, Bibliotheca, 168


This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.