Befehlsnotstand

Last updated March 23, 2024

Befehlsnotstand (English: Necessity to obey orders) is a German legal term that refers to a situation in which a certain action is ordered that violates law, but where the refusal to carry out such an order would lead to drastic consequences, specifically danger to life or body, for the person refusing to carry out the order.^[1]

The concept of Befehlsnotstand was successfully used as a defense in World War II-related war crimes trials in Germany in the 1950s and 1960s^[2] but research into the subject since has proven that Befehlsnotstand as such did not exist, meaning German soldiers of the Wehrmacht or Schutzstaffel did not actually face drastic consequences if refusing such an order during the war.^[3]^[4] Refusing a lawful order did however result in consequences, with 23,000 German soldiers executed for refusing orders.^[5]

Etymology

Befehlsnotstand is a compound word, made up of the German words Befehl (command or order) and Notstand (emergency). The term has been translated into English by various sources as "necessity to obey order",^[6] "a compulsion to obey orders"^[7] or "crisis created as a result of following orders".^[8]

Notstand in German law can be compared to necessity ^[9] in the criminal law of other nations.^[10]

Germany

Background

In German law, the situation Befehlsnotstand arises when a person refusing to carry out an unlawful order faces drastic consequences for the refusal. In such a situation, the person could not be prosecuted for carrying out the order.^[2] Drastic consequences, in German military law, are defined as a danger to life or body, and are not defined as loss of rank, incarceration or removal to a penal unit, such as a Strafbataillon .^[11]

Nazi Germany

The term is commonly, but not exclusively, associated with German war crimes and the Holocaust during World War II, following which Befehlsnotstand was used as line of defense by the accused in post-war trials. In the 1950s and 1960s the use of Befehlsnotstand as a defense in war crimes trials in Germany was quite successful as it generally protected the accused from punishment. With the formation of the Central Office of the State Justice Administrations for the Investigation of National Socialist Crimes, this changed after historical research by the organisation regarding Einsatzgruppen of the Sicherheitsdienst or concentration camp personnel revealed that no known case could be cited where refusing an order did indeed result in severe punishment. More commonly, military personnel refusing such an order were transferred to a different unit.^[2] An example for this was Wehrmacht Captain Otto Freyer, who was transferred towards the end of the war to the Neuengamme concentration camp. Freyer was deemed too soft for his role, which included supervision of executions and commanding a sub-camp at Kaltenkirchen, and he was eventually transferred again at his own request.^[12]

In practice, refusing a superior order to participate in war crimes by German soldiers almost never led to dire consequences for the refusing person, and punishment, if any, was relatively mild. It usually resulted in degradation and being sent to serve with fighting units at the front.^[13] German historian Sven Felix Kellerhoff argued that, instead of fear of punishment the participants were more afraid of peer pressure and the possibility of exclusion from their group.^[3]

Kellerhoff further argued that the situation of Einsatzgruppen members taking part in massacres did not even constitute the lesser Putativnotstand,^[3] a state where the individual mistakenly believes their life is in danger if the order is disobeyed when, in reality, no such danger exists.^[14]

Manfred Oldenburg, in his book Ideology and Military Calculation, stated that there are no known cases where the refusal to participate in an execution of civilians has led to drastic consequences for soldiers of the Wehrmacht or SS.^[4] German soldiers did however face drastic consequences if refusing legal orders during the war.^[15]^[3] One and a half million German soldiers were sentenced to imprisonment for refusing to follow an order and 30,000 were sentenced to death, of whom 23,000 were executed.^[5]

East Germany

Befehlsnotstand was also used, as well as the Nuremberg defense, by former East German border guards, tried after the German reunification in the Mauerschützenprozesse [ de; pl ], the trials of East German borders guards accused of unlawful killings of escapees at the Berlin Wall and the Inner German border as part of the Schießbefehl .^[16] In an interview with journalist John O. Koehler, former Stasi political prisoner Werner Juretzko commented resignedly about the leniency the post-1989 German legal system has shown to East Germans guilty of crimes against humanity, "I guess the Germans have lost their balls."^[17]

Current German law

In current German law, articles § 34 and § 35 of the German penal code, the Strafgesetzbuch , govern the law on Notstand. Formerly it was governed by articles § 52 and 54.^[8]

Article 34 deals with Rechtfertigender Notstand, necessity as justification, while article 35 deals with Entschuldigender Notstand, necessity as excuse.^[9]

In other countries

Argentina

The Law of Due Obedience (Spanish : Ley de obediencia debida), a law passed by the National Congress of Argentina after the end of the military dictatorship, translated in German as the Befehlsnotstandsgesetz (Gesetz meaning law in German), protected all officers and their subordinates of the armed forces and security forces from prosecution for most crimes committed during the dictatorship but was eventually annulled in 2005.^[18]

Related Research Articles

Alfred Josef Ferdinand Jodl was a German Generaloberst who served as the Chief of the Operations Staff of the Oberkommando der Wehrmacht – the German Armed Forces High Command – throughout World War II.

Einsatzgruppen were Schutzstaffel (SS) paramilitary death squads of Nazi Germany that were responsible for mass murder, primarily by shooting, during World War II (1939–1945) in German-occupied Europe. The Einsatzgruppen had an integral role in the implementation of the so-called "Final Solution to the Jewish question" in territories conquered by Nazi Germany, and were involved in the murder of much of the intelligentsia and cultural elite of Poland, including members of the Catholic priesthood. Almost all of the people they murdered were civilians, beginning with the intelligentsia and swiftly progressing to Soviet political commissars, Jews, and Romani people, as well as actual or alleged partisans throughout Eastern Europe.

The Commissar Order was an order issued by the German High Command (OKW) on 6 June 1941 before Operation Barbarossa. Its official name was Guidelines for the Treatment of Political Commissars. It instructed the Wehrmacht that any Soviet political commissar identified among captured troops be summarily executed as a purported enforcer of the so-called Judeo-Bolshevism ideology in military forces. It is one of a series of criminal orders issued by the Nazi leadership.

Kurt Meyer was an SS commander and convicted war criminal of Nazi Germany. He served in the Waffen-SS and participated in the Battle of France, Operation Barbarossa, and other engagements during World War II. Meyer commanded the 12th SS Panzer Division Hitlerjugend during the Allied invasion of Normandy, and was a recipient of the Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross with Oak Leaves and Swords.

The 17th Infantry Division was an infantry division of the German Army, active before and during World War II. Formed in 1934, it took part in most of the campaigns of the Wehrmacht and was decimated in January 1945. Reconstituted in Germany, it surrendered to the Allies in May of that year. The division was responsible for a number of war crimes.

During World War II, the German Wehrmacht committed systematic war crimes, including massacres, mass rape, looting, the exploitation of forced labour, the murder of three million Soviet prisoners of war, and participated in the extermination of Jews. While the Nazi Party's own SS forces was the organization most responsible for the genocidal killing of the Holocaust, the regular armed forces of the Wehrmacht committed many war crimes of their own, particularly on the Eastern Front.

Capital punishment in Germany has been abolished for all crimes, and is now explicitly prohibited by constitution. It was abolished in West Germany in 1949, in the Saarland in 1956, and East Germany in 1987. The last person executed in Germany was the East German Werner Teske, who was executed at Leipzig Prison in 1981.

Strafbataillon is the generic term for penal units that were created from prisoners during the Second World War in all branches of the Wehrmacht. Soldiers, criminals and civilians sentenced to those units were generally poorly armed and required to undertake dangerous high-casualty missions. The Strafbataillon were operated and administered by the Feldgendarmerie, the German military police.

A war crimes trial is the trial of persons charged with criminal violation of the laws and customs of war and related principles of international law committed during armed conflict.

The Severity Order or Reichenau Order was the name given to an order promulgated within the German Sixth Army on the Eastern Front during World War II by Generalfeldmarschall Walter von Reichenau on 10 October 1941.

Soviet prisoners of war (POWs) held by Nazi Germany and primarily in the custody of the German Army, were starved and subjected to deadly conditions. Of nearly six million that were captured, around 3 million died during their imprisonment.

Superior orders, also known as the Nuremberg defense or just following orders, is a plea in a court of law that a person, whether a member of the military, law enforcement, or the civilian population, should not be considered guilty of committing crimes that were ordered by a superior officer or official.

The Wehrmacht were the unified armed forces of Nazi Germany from 1935 to 1945. It consisted of the Heer (army), the Kriegsmarine (navy) and the Luftwaffe. The designation "Wehrmacht" replaced the previously used term Reichswehr and was the manifestation of the Nazi regime's efforts to rearm Germany to a greater extent than the Treaty of Versailles permitted.

The Schnez-Truppe or Schnez Organisation was an illegal clandestine paramilitary organisation formed in West Germany in 1949 by veterans of the Wehrmacht and Waffen-SS under the leadership of Albert Schnez, that intended to fight against the Soviet Union in the event of an invasion. It has been reported as having been founded with a membership of some 2,000 former officers; later obtaining a total strength of up to 40,000 members.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Franz Kurowski</span> German author (1923–2011)

Franz Kurowski was a German author of fiction and non-fiction who specialised in World War II topics. He is best known for producing apologist, revisionist and semi-fictional works on the history of the war, including the popular English-language series Panzer Aces and Infantry Aces.

The myth of the clean Wehrmacht is the negationist notion that the regular German armed forces were not involved in the Holocaust or other war crimes during World War II. The myth, heavily promoted by German authors and military personnel after World War II, completely denies the culpability of the German military command in the planning and perpetration of war crimes. Even where the perpetration of war crimes and the waging of an extermination campaign, particularly in the Soviet Union – where the Nazis viewed the population as "sub-humans" ruled by "Jewish Bolshevik" conspirators – has been acknowledged, they are ascribed to the "Party soldiers corps", the Schutzstaffel (SS), but not the regular German military.

Felix Römer is a German historian who specialises in the history of World War II. He has conducted pioneering research into the implementation of the Commissar Order by combat formations of the Wehrmacht and the attitudes of German soldiers based on the surreptitiously recorded conversations of prisoners of war held in Fort Hunt, Virginia, United States.

Wilhelm Deist (1931–2003) was a German historian and author who specialised in the European history of 19th and 20th with an emphasis on the history of World War I. Deist was senior historian at the Military History Research Office (MGFA) and honorary professor at the University of Freiburg. Deist was a widely published author and a chief editor of the seminal series Germany and the Second World War from the MGFA.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Axis war crimes in Italy</span> Aspect of World War II

Two of the three Axis powers of World War II—Nazi Germany and their Fascist Italian allies—committed war crimes in the Kingdom of Italy.

The Lake Maggiore massacres was a set of World War II war crimes that took place near Lake Maggiore, Italy, in September and October 1943. Despite strict orders not to commit any violence against civilians in the aftermath of the Italian surrender on 8 September 1943, members of the 1st SS Panzer Division Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler murdered 56, predominantly Italian and Greek, Jews. Many of the bodies were sunk into the lake to prevent discovery but one washed ashore in neighbouring Switzerland, drawing international attention to the massacre and prompting an inconclusive divisional inquiry. It is commonly referred to as the first German massacre of Jews in Italy during World War II.

References

↑ "Befehlsnotstand" (in German). www.rechtslexikon.net. Retrieved 17 October 2018.
1 2 3 Kellerhoff, Sven Felix (15 July 2015). "Hatten SS-Mitglieder damals wirklich "keine Wahl"?" [Did SS members really have "no choice?"]. Die Welt (in German). Retrieved 17 October 2018.
1 2 3 4 Kellerhoff, Sven Felix (14 January 2014). "Warum junge Männer im Akkord morden" [Why young men murdered ceaselessly]. Die Welt (in German). Retrieved 17 October 2018.
1 2 Oldenburg 2004, p. 222.
1 2 Norbert Haase: Wehrmachtangehörige vor dem Kriegsgericht. In: R.D. Müller, H.E. Volkmann (Hrsg. im Auftrag des MGFA): Die Wehrmacht: Mythos und Realität. Oldenbourg, München 1999, ISBN 3-486-56383-1, page 481
↑ Wolfgang Sofsky (2013-06-17). The Order of Terror: The Concentration Camp. Princeton University Press. p. 334. ISBN 978-1400822188 . Retrieved 23 October 2018.
↑ "Befehlsnotstand" (in German). Langenscheidt . Retrieved 17 October 2018.
1 2 Lewy 2017, p. 108.
1 2 van Sliedregt, 2012, Notes 162 & 163
↑ "Necessity Law and Legal Definition". www.uslegal.com. Retrieved 18 October 2018.
↑ "NS-Verbrechen, totalitäre Herrschaft und individuelle Verantwortlichkeit: Das Problem des sog. Befehlsnotstandes" [Nazi crimes, totalitarian regime and individual responsibility: The problem of the so called Befehlsnotstand](PDF) (in German). German Federal Archives . Retrieved 17 October 2018.
↑ "Befehlsnotstand nur eine Legende?" [Befehlsnotstand just a legend?]. Hamburger Abendblatt (in German). 17 August 2000. Retrieved 17 October 2018.
↑ Bruners, Jan. "Strafverfolgung von NS-Verbrechen" [Criminal prosecution of Nazi crimes](PDF) (in German). Universität Köln . Retrieved 17 October 2018.
↑ "Putativnotstand" (in German). www.rechtslexikon.net. Retrieved 18 October 2018.
↑ Messerschmidt, Wüllner: Die Wehrmachtjustiz im Dienste des Nationalsozialismus. Baden-Baden 1987, page 15, pages 49–51, pages 87+91. In: Walter Manoschek: Opfer der NS-Militärjustiz. Wien 2003, page 27 f
↑ "Wer trägt die Schuld? - Schießbefehl und Mauertote" [Who is guilty? - Order to shoot and wall dead] (in German). Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. 30 September 2005. Retrieved 17 October 2018.
↑ Koehler, John O. (1999). Stasi: the untold story of the East German secret police. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press. ISBN 0-8133-3409-8. OCLC 39256274. pp. 279–282.
↑ "Vergangenheitspolitik in Chile, Argentinien und Uruguay" [Political history in Chile, Argentina and Uruguay] (in German). Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. 9 October 2006. Retrieved 18 October 2018.

Bibliography

Lewy, Guenter (2017). Perpetrators: The World of the Holocaust Killers. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0190661137.
Oldenburg, Manfred (2004). Ideologie und militärisches Kalkül: die Besatzungspolitik der Wehrmacht in der Sowjetunion 1942 [Ideologie and Military calculation: the occupational policies of the Wehrmacht in the Soviet Union in 1942] (in German). Böhlau Verlag Köln Weimar. ISBN 978-3412145033.
van Sliedregt, Elies (2012). Individual Criminal Responsibility in International Law. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0199560363.

Further reading