Bovine submaxillary mucin coatings

Last updated
BSM can be derived from any bovine source. Vacas en Nicaragua.jpg
BSM can be derived from any bovine source.
Bovine submaxillary mucin
Identifiers
Organism Bos taurus
SymbolBSM1
UniProt O62672
Search for
Structures Swiss-model
Domains InterPro
May be part of a larger MUC19 gene, which corresponds to the porcine submaxillary mucin. [1]

Bovine submaxillary mucin (BSM) coatings are a surface treatment provided to biomaterials intended to reduce the growth of disadvantageous bacteria and fungi such as S. epidermidis , E. coli , and Candida albicans . [2] BSM is a substance extracted from the fresh salivary glands of cows. It exhibits unique physical properties, such as high molecular weight and amphiphilicity, that allow it to be used for many biomedical applications.

Contents

Each species[ clarification needed ] possesses mucin-secreting submaxillary glands. Currently, eight different mucins have been identified for humans. [3] However, it is the mucin from bovine and porcine sources that have been used in several biomaterial applications. The most common use of BSM is in coatings for implanted materials. In such applications, the adsorption characteristics of BSM are integral to the behavior of materials in vivo. Survival and rejection of an implant are highly dependent on surface modifications that dictate the interfacial interaction between a material and the body. Thus, BSM adsorption increases biocompatibility.

Epithelial tissue lines surfaces throughout the body. A mucous gel layer composed of protein coats this tissue. The main function of the layer is protection from mechanical stress, dehydration, and bacterial infections. It also plays a role in cellular signaling, cellular interactions, and pH regulation. [2] The two main components of the gel are mucins and water, with the mucins forming the backbone of the mucous. [4]

Mucin originates from the mucus secretions from submaxillary glands, which are salivary glands that are located under the floor of the mouth. The secreted mucin assists in digestion by coating the bolus such that it travels easily through the digestive tract. Mucins are constituents of one class of glycoproteins: sialic acid-containing glycoproteins, or mucoproteins. [5] They have a high molecular weight and exist as either membrane-bound or secretory mucins. The membrane-bound type have a hydrophilic area that extends along a membrane and attaches to cellular surfaces. Secretory mucins are the main components of the mucous gel layer that coats the epithelium. [3]

Physical characteristics

While mucus is mostly composed of water, its structural and rheological properties are characterized by mucin. Under an atomic force microscope, BSM appears as a composition of dumbbell shaped fibers at heights of approximately 1 nm. [6] BSM can be purchased as a powder, in which case it appears white to light brown. [7]

Mechanical properties

Mucin is a fibrous matrix with gel-like properties. When mixed into an aqueous solution, higher concentrations of mucin result in lower surface tension values. [2] BSM has a hydration enthalpy of -20 kJ/mol and an RH level for glass transition of 60-70%. [6]

Properties of Mucin from Various Species
Source of MucinMolecular Weight [kDa]Γ [mg/m2] after 24h adsorption to hydrophilic silica with 5 mg/ml mucin [8] Γ [mg/m2] after 24h adsorption to hydrophobic silica with 5 mg/ml mucin [8]
Bovine Submaxillary4000 [5] 0.252
Porcine Submaxillary500-250 [9] 1.152
Human Sublingual (High Molecular Weight)>1000 [10] -5
Surface Properties of BSM Coated versus Non-Coated Materials
θ, Contact Angle of Water on PMMA [2] γ, Surface Tension on PBS [11] Non-Coated69.4±0.2°70.2 [mN/m]
Coated50.2±4.0°46.5-47.3 [mN/m]
Surface Properties of Various Solutions of Mucin and NaCl [12]
λ, Debye Length [nm]κ, Adsorption [nm]δ, Surface Density of Total Adsorbed Mucin [mg/m2
Mucin 0.1 g/L + NaCl 10−3 M410.0242.4
Mucin 0.2 g/L + NaCl 10−3 M430.1054.3
Mucin 0.1 g/L + NaCl 0.15 M410.0244.5
Mucin 0.05 g/L + NaCl 0.15 M1100.0092.3

Chemical composition

The structure of mucin is shown and includes a core protein with O-linked glycans. Mucin.jpg
The structure of mucin is shown and includes a core protein with O-linked glycans.

Being large glycoproteins, mucins have high carbohydrate content, contributing to their fibrous structure. These carbohydrates branch off of polypeptide chains in the form of oligosaccharides including N-acetylgalactosamine, N-acetylglucosamine, fucose, galactose, and sialic acid. The serine and threonine hydroxyl groups link to the polypeptide chains via O-glycosidic linkages.

Interaction with surfaces

Mucins interact with surfaces in a unique way due to the amphiphilic properties the molecules exhibit.

Adsorption of BSM to solid surfaces and types of bonding

Mucins adhere well to polymeric surfaces through various types of bonding: (1) covalent bond attachment (2) electrostatic interaction, which requires matching of charge groups between the polymer and mucus; (3) hydrogen bonding; and (4) hydrophobic interactions . These interactions require very close contact between the surface and the mucus in order to facilitate strong bonding. [13] Most mucins adsorb to solid surfaces fairly easily without surface preparation due to the attractive interaction of the surface with the non-glycosylated region of the molecule. Surface force measurements reveal that long range steric repulsion forces exist between mucin coated surfaces and can be detected at a distance of up 100 nm or more. This indicates that mucin segments extend into the ambient solution at a long distance. Because mucin is amphiphilic, the non-glycosylated regions of the molecule interacts with the surface and the glycosylated region interacts with the ambient solution causing the steric repulsion. The repulsive forces applied by the mucin creates anti-adhesive properties which can suppress cell adhesion to surfaces. [4]

The efficiency of mucin adherence to hydrophobic surfaces has been analyzed by applying a coating of mucin and measuring the number of mucins remaining on the hydrophobic material after rinsing. The amount of mucin removed was a small fraction of the remaining material. [4]

A different method to determine the amount of mucin adsorption to a solid surface involves determining the refractive index of the clean solid surface and comparing that number to the refractive index with adsorbed mucin on the surface. The adsorbtion of mucin will alter the refractive index which can be used to calculate the amount of mucin molecules in the adsorbed layer (see equations below).

Equation to estimate the Index of Refraction: [4]

n = ns + dn/dcc

n= Refractive Index

ns = Refractive Index of Solvent

dn/dc= Refractive Index Increment

c= Concentrations of Dissolved Molecules

Equation to estimate the amount of molecules in the adsorbed layer: [4]

Γ = nns/dn/dcd

Γ= Surface Excess

n= Refractive Index

ns = Refractive Index of Solvent

dn/dc= Refractive Index Increment

d= Ellipsometric Thickness

Hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions

Proteins usually readily adsorb to solid surfaces from aqueous solutions to form a protein film, typically mixed with water. Many types of interactions can mediate the adsorption; among these, hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions have been identified as central factors determining protein adsorption to surfaces and the repulsive reaction to molecules in solution. In addition, structural rearrangements of proteins as well as hydrogen bonding are suggested to influence the adsorption. The glycosylated region of mucins extend into the water which forces the molecules to extend into the ambient solution in a random coil conformation. Additionally, the high molecular weight of mucin allows the molecules to overlap and entangle when present in low concentrations. [4]

BSM adsorbs to surfaces with the chains extending outward from the adsorption site. BSM Adhesion.jpg
BSM adsorbs to surfaces with the chains extending outward from the adsorption site.

PH dependence of adsorption

Empirical data has shown that pH has an influence on the adsorption of mucin to surfaces. At pH 4, the adsorbed amount of mucin was higher, but the thickness of the layer was lower when compared to pH 6 environments. The increased amount of mucin adsorption can be explained by the high amount of protonated amino groups that are present at the pH 4 level that form electrostatic bonds with negatively charged groups in the molecule. At lower pH values and low ionic strength, the adsorbed amount of BSM to a surface increases. the lower thickness level seen a lower pH values can be explained by a stronger attractive interaction of mucin to the surface causing the particles to deform more readily to increase amount of adsorption. [4]

Biocompatibility

Because BSM is frequently applied as a coating on a material that will interact with the human body, it is important to minimize disadvantageous interactions with tissues and cells. Two considerations include reducing tissue reactivity, as in inflammatory and immune responses, and preventing the adsorption of particles, like bacteria.

Tissue reactivity

BSM-coated polyurethane samples were implanted in sheep in order to assess if the coatings caused minimal host responses during a 30-day implantation. After inspection of the explanted samples, it was revealed that the host tissue had lower inflammatory responses and minimal capsule formation with the BSM-coated polyurethane samples than the uncoated samples. These results make the BSM coatings appealing for use in biomedical applications where synthetic materials directly interface with tissues. [4]

Mucins are also considered useful in tissue related applications because they are natural and biological, can form hydrogels, show resistance to proteolytic degradation, and have good adhesion to surfaces while repelling molecules at the ambient solution interface. Also, the possibility to allow the uptake of certain proteins makes the BSM coatings very appealing for biomedical uses because correct protein uptake can potentially increase the recovery speed in patients. [5]

Prevention of adsorbing particles

In the previous sections, it has been described that mucin is useful in anti-adhesive and repelling applications. This is because BSM adheres well to surfaces, but the non polar ends of the molecules that extend into the ambient solution exhibit a repulsive behavior that prevents the external particles from reaching the surface for adsorption. In the activity of preventing more adsorbed particles, the BSM layer only has to be 0.3 mg/m^2 thick to completely prevent adsorption. [4]

Applications

Implant coatings

BSM is an active area of research for several biomedical engineering applications. Due to its adsorption on solid surfaces, it is useful in vivo to prevent bacterial infections. BSM and bacteria compete for adsorption sites; mucin adhesion blocks bacterial adhesion on surfaces. Consequently, the risk of bacterial attachment and infection is reduced. While bacterial infections are common concerns in the medical, dental, and food industries, they are the primary cause of device failures in biological implants. To combat this issue, BSM has been used as a coating for a poly(acrylic acid-b-methyl methacrylate) (PAA-b-PMMA) diblock copolymer. The copolymer provides two mechanisms that contribute to the bacterial resistance of the biomaterial. First, the PAA block assists the adsorption of BSM to the surface. Second, the PMMA block prevents the dissolution of BSM in aqueous environments. This behavior is imperative in the lubrication of cardiovascular stents and urinary catheters as they are inserted within patients. Due to the adsorption of BSM, the hydrophobicity of the surface decreases as well as the incidence of bacterial adhesion. [2]

Drug delivery systems

Drug delivery is another application that utilizes BSM coatings. Drug delivery systems employ pharmaceutical products within encapsulated compartments. These compartments are composed of hydrophilic polymers that enable the release of a particular drug at a specified rate and release profile. BSM coatings are advantageous in mucoadhesive films, which release drugs to surrounding mucosal tissue after implantation. Such delivery systems have been made specifically with PAA polymers and BSM coatings. [2] Just like the application above, the PAA polymer improved the adsorption of BSM on its surface to prevent bacterial adhesion and potential infection. Mucin interaction with the pharmaceutical product itself and other proteins encountered in the body is vital for the drug delivery process. The behavior of BSM and drugs is investigated to ensure that one element does not disrupt the function of the other. Coatings are also synthesized, tested, and analyzed such that various proteins in the body do not adversely affect BSM adsorption and bacterial resistance. [4]

Hydrogels

BSM has also been used for the fabrication of hydrogels. Hydrogels are crosslinked hydrophilic polymer matrices in water, which is the dispersion medium. The properties of BSM are ideal for hydrogel formation. Its glycosylated regions interact with water, forming elongated random coils. Additionally, its high molecular weight enables it to overlap at low concentrations. These synergistic behaviors create effective gel matrices that are suitable for several biomedical applications, such as scaffolds, medical electrodes, and drug delivery systems. [4]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Adsorption</span> Phenomenon of surface adhesion

Adsorption is the adhesion of atoms, ions or molecules from a gas, liquid or dissolved solid to a surface. This process creates a film of the adsorbate * on the surface of the adsorbent(solvent). This process differs from absorption, in which a fluid is dissolved by or permeates a liquid or solid. Adsorption is a surface phenomenon and does not penetrate through the surface to the bulk of the adsorbent, while absorption involves the whole volume of the material, although adsorption does often precede absorption. The term sorption encompasses both processes, while desorption is the reverse of it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Biocompatibility</span> Biologically compatible substance

Biocompatibility is related to the behavior of biomaterials in various contexts. The term refers to the ability of a material to perform with an appropriate host response in a specific situation. The ambiguity of the term reflects the ongoing development of insights into how biomaterials interact with the human body and eventually how those interactions determine the clinical success of a medical device. Modern medical devices and prostheses are often made of more than one material so it might not always be sufficient to talk about the biocompatibility of a specific material. Even the same materials, such as diamond-like carbon coatings, may show different levels of biocompatibility based on the manufacturing conditions and characteristics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Biomaterial</span> Any substance that has been engineered to interact with biological systems for a medical purpose

A biomaterial is a substance that has been engineered to interact with biological systems for a medical purpose, either a therapeutic or a diagnostic one. As a science, biomaterials is about fifty years old. The study of biomaterials is called biomaterials science or biomaterials engineering. It has experienced steady and strong growth over its history, with many companies investing large amounts of money into the development of new products. Biomaterials science encompasses elements of medicine, biology, chemistry, tissue engineering and materials science.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Foreign body reaction</span> Medical condition

A foreign body reaction (FBR) is a typical tissue response to a foreign body within biological tissue. It usually includes the formation of a foreign body granuloma. Tissue-encapsulation of an implant is an example, as is inflammation around a splinter. Foreign body granuloma formation consists of protein adsorption, macrophages, multinucleated foreign body giant cells, fibroblasts, and angiogenesis. It has also been proposed that the mechanical property of the interface between an implant and its surrounding tissues is critical for the host response.

A nerve guidance conduit is an artificial means of guiding axonal regrowth to facilitate nerve regeneration and is one of several clinical treatments for nerve injuries. When direct suturing of the two stumps of a severed nerve cannot be accomplished without tension, the standard clinical treatment for peripheral nerve injuries is autologous nerve grafting. Due to the limited availability of donor tissue and functional recovery in autologous nerve grafting, neural tissue engineering research has focused on the development of bioartificial nerve guidance conduits as an alternative treatment, especially for large defects. Similar techniques are also being explored for nerve repair in the spinal cord but nerve regeneration in the central nervous system poses a greater challenge because its axons do not regenerate appreciably in their native environment.

Mucoadhesion describes the attractive forces between a biological material and mucus or mucous membrane. Mucous membranes adhere to epithelial surfaces such as the gastrointestinal tract (GI-tract), the vagina, the lung, the eye, etc. They are generally hydrophilic as they contain many hydrogen macromolecules due to the large amount of water within its composition. However, mucin also contains glycoproteins that enable the formation of a gel-like substance. Understanding the hydrophilic bonding and adhesion mechanisms of mucus to biological material is of utmost importance in order to produce the most efficient applications. For example, in drug delivery systems, the mucus layer must be penetrated in order to effectively transport micro- or nanosized drug particles into the body. Bioadhesion is the mechanism by which two biological materials are held together by interfacial forces.

Within surface science, a quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring (QCM-D) is a type of quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) based on the ring-down technique. It is used in interfacial acoustic sensing. Its most common application is the determination of a film thickness in a liquid environment. It can be used to investigate further properties of the sample, most notably the layer's softness.

Adsorption is the accumulation and adhesion of molecules, atoms, ions, or larger particles to a surface, but without surface penetration occurring. The adsorption of larger biomolecules such as proteins is of high physiological relevance, and as such they adsorb with different mechanisms than their molecular or atomic analogs. Some of the major driving forces behind protein adsorption include: surface energy, intermolecular forces, hydrophobicity, and ionic or electrostatic interaction. By knowing how these factors affect protein adsorption, they can then be manipulated by machining, alloying, and other engineering techniques to select for the most optimal performance in biomedical or physiological applications.

Adsorption is the adhesion of ions or molecules onto the surface of another phase. Adsorption may occur via physisorption and chemisorption. Ions and molecules can adsorb to many types of surfaces including polymer surfaces. A polymer is a large molecule composed of repeating subunits bound together by covalent bonds. In dilute solution, polymers form globule structures. When a polymer adsorbs to a surface that it interacts favorably with, the globule is essentially squashed, and the polymer has a pancake structure.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Surface modification of biomaterials with proteins</span>

Biomaterials are materials that are used in contact with biological systems. Biocompatibility and applicability of surface modification with current uses of metallic, polymeric and ceramic biomaterials allow alteration of properties to enhance performance in a biological environment while retaining bulk properties of the desired device.

Polymeric materials have widespread application due to their versatile characteristics, cost-effectiveness, and highly tailored production. The science of polymer synthesis allows for excellent control over the properties of a bulk polymer sample. However, surface interactions of polymer substrates are an essential area of study in biotechnology, nanotechnology, and in all forms of coating applications. In these cases, the surface characteristics of the polymer and material, and the resulting forces between them largely determine its utility and reliability. In biomedical applications for example, the bodily response to foreign material, and thus biocompatibility, is governed by surface interactions. In addition, surface science is integral part of the formulation, manufacturing, and application of coatings.

Adsorption of polyelectrolytes on solid substrates is a surface phenomenon where long-chained polymer molecules with charged groups bind to a surface that is charged in the opposite polarity. On the molecular level, the polymers do not actually bond to the surface, but tend to "stick" to the surface via intermolecular forces and the charges created by the dissociation of various side groups of the polymer. Because the polymer molecules are so long, they have a large amount of surface area with which to contact the surface and thus do not desorb as small molecules are likely to do. This means that adsorbed layers of polyelectrolytes form a very durable coating. Due to this important characteristic of polyelectrolyte layers they are used extensively in industry as flocculants, for solubilization, as supersorbers, antistatic agents, as oil recovery aids, as gelling aids in nutrition, additives in concrete, or for blood compatibility enhancement to name a few.

Protein adsorption refers to the adhesion of proteins to solid surfaces. This phenomenon is an important issue in the food processing industry, particularly in milk processing and wine and beer making. Excessive adsorption, or protein fouling, can lead to health and sanitation issues, as the adsorbed protein is very difficult to clean and can harbor bacteria, as is the case in biofilms. Product quality can be adversely affected if the adsorbed material interferes with processing steps, like pasteurization. However, in some cases protein adsorption is used to improve food quality, as is the case in fining of wines.

Silanization of silicon and mica is the coating of these materials with a thin layer of self assembling units.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Titanium biocompatibility</span>

Titanium was first introduced into surgeries in the 1950s after having been used in dentistry for a decade prior. It is now the metal of choice for prosthetics, internal fixation, inner body devices, and instrumentation. Titanium is used from head to toe in biomedical implants. One can find titanium in neurosurgery, bone conduction hearing aids, false eye implants, spinal fusion cages, pacemakers, toe implants, and shoulder/elbow/hip/knee replacements along with many more. The main reason why titanium is often used in the body is due to titanium's biocompatibility and, with surface modifications, bioactive surface. The surface characteristics that affect biocompatibility are surface texture, steric hindrance, binding sites, and hydrophobicity (wetting). These characteristics are optimized to create an ideal cellular response. Some medical implants, as well as parts of surgical instruments are coated with titanium nitride (TiN).

Biomaterials exhibit various degrees of compatibility with the harsh environment within a living organism. They need to be nonreactive chemically and physically with the body, as well as integrate when deposited into tissue. The extent of compatibility varies based on the application and material required. Often modifications to the surface of a biomaterial system are required to maximize performance. The surface can be modified in many ways, including plasma modification and applying coatings to the substrate. Surface modifications can be used to affect surface energy, adhesion, biocompatibility, chemical inertness, lubricity, sterility, asepsis, thrombogenicity, susceptibility to corrosion, degradation, and hydrophilicity.

Ultra-low fouling is a rating of a surface's ability to shed potential contamination. Surfaces are prone to contamination, which is a phenomenon known as fouling. Unwanted adsorbates caused by fouling change the properties of a surface, which is often counter-productive to the function of that surface. Consequently, a necessity for anti-fouling surfaces has arisen in many fields: blocked pipes inhibit factory productivity, biofouling increases fuel consumption on ships, medical devices must be kept sanitary, etc. Although chemical fouling inhibitors, metallic coatings, and cleaning processes can be used to reduce fouling, non-toxic surfaces with anti-fouling properties are ideal for fouling prevention. To be considered effective, an ultra-low fouling surface must be able to repel and withstand the accumulation of detrimental aggregates down to less than 5 ng/cm2. A recent surge of research has been conducted to create these surfaces in order to benefit the biological, nautical, mechanical, and medical fields.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Surface chemistry of neural implants</span>

As with any material implanted in the body, it is important to minimize or eliminate foreign body response and maximize effectual integration. Neural implants have the potential to increase the quality of life for patients with such disabilities as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, epilepsy, depression, and migraines. With the complexity of interfaces between a neural implant and brain tissue, adverse reactions such as fibrous tissue encapsulation that hinder the functionality, occur. Surface modifications to these implants can help improve the tissue-implant interface, increasing the lifetime and effectiveness of the implant.

Bioinstructive materials provide instruction to biological cells or tissue, for example immune instruction when monocytes are cultured on certain polymers they polarise to pro- or anti-inflammatory macrophages with potential applications in implanted devices, or materials for the repair of musculoskeletal tissues. Due to the paucity of information on the mechanism of materials control of cells, beyond the general recognition of the important role of adsorbed biomolecules, high throughput screening of large libraries of materials, topographies, and shapes are often used to identify cell instructive material systems. Applications of bioinstructive materials as substrates for stem cell production, cell delivery and reduction of foreign body reaction and coatings to reduce infections on medical devices. This non-leaching approach is distinct from strategies of infection control relying on antibiotic release, cytokine delivery or guidance of cells by surface located epitopes inspired by nature.

A protein corona is a dynamic coating of biomolecules, usually proteins, around the surface of a nanoparticle that forms spontaneously in colloidal nanomaterials upon exposure to biological mediums. Protein coronas can form in many different patterns depending on their size, shape, composition, charge, and surface functional groups, and have properties that vary in different environmental factors like temperature, pH, shearing stress, immersed media composition, and exposing time. These coatings are also changeable according to the conditions of the biochemical and physiochemical surface interactions. Types of protein coronas are known to be divided into two categories: “hard” and “soft”. “Hard” coronas have higher-affinity proteins that are irreversibly bonded to the nanoparticle surface, while “soft” coronas have lower-affinity proteins on the nanoparticle surface that are reversibly bound. These reversibly-bound proteins allow for the biomolecules in “soft” protein coronas to be exchanged or detached over time for various applications. This process is governed by the intermolecular protein-nanoparticle and protein-protein interactions that exist within a solution. In "soft" protein coronas, it is common to observe an exchange of proteins at the surface; larger proteins with lower affinities will often aggregate to the surface of the nanoparticle first, and over time, smaller proteins with higher affinities will replace them, "hardening" the corona, known as the Vroman effect.

References

  1. Hoorens, PR; Rinaldi, M; Li, RW; Goddeeris, B; Claerebout, E; Vercruysse, J; Geldhof, P (7 March 2011). "Genome wide analysis of the bovine mucin genes and their gastrointestinal transcription profile". BMC Genomics. 12: 140. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-140 . PMC   3056801 . PMID   21385362.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Bushnak IA, Labeed FH, Sear RP, Keddie JL (2010). "Adhesion of microorganisms to bovine submaxillary mucin coatings: effect of coating deposition conditions" (PDF). Biofouling. 26 (4): 387–97. doi:10.1080/08927011003646809. PMID   20182931. S2CID   18629974.
  3. 1 2 "Polymeric Biomaterials, Revised and Expanded." Google Books. Ed. Severian Dumitriu. N.p., n.d. Web. 5 May 2013.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Svensson, Olof. INTERACTIONS OF MUCINS WITH BIOPOLYMERS AND DRUG DELIVERY PARTICLES. Thesis. Malmö University, 2008. Holmbergs: Malmö University, 2008. Print.
  5. 1 2 3 Proust, Jacques Emile; Baszkin, Adam; Perez, Eric; Boissonnade, Marie Martine (1984). "Bovine submaxillary mucin (BSM) adsorption at solid/ liquid interfaces and surface forces". Colloids and Surfaces. 10: 43–52. doi:10.1016/0166-6622(84)80006-2. ISSN   0166-6622.
  6. 1 2 Znamenskaya, Yana; Sotres, Javier; Engblom, Johan; Arnebrant, Thomas; Kocherbitov, Vitaly (2012). "Effect of Hydration on Structural and Thermodynamic Properties of Pig Gastric and Bovine Submaxillary Gland Mucins". The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 116 (16): 5047–5055. doi:10.1021/jp212495t. ISSN   1520-6106. PMID   22455728.
  7. Sigma-Aldrich. "Mucin from Bovine Submaxillary Glands." Sigma-Aldrich. Sigma-Aldrich, n.d. Web. 23 May 2013.
  8. 1 2 Sandberg, T; Blom, H; Caldwell, K (2009). "Potential use of mucins as biomaterial coatings. I. Fractionation, characterization, and model adsorption of bovine, porcine, and human mucins". Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 91 (3): 762–772. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.32266. PMID   19051309.
  9. Gupta, R; Jentoft, N (1989). "Subunit Structure of Porcine Submaxillary Mucin". Biochemistry. 28 (14): 6114–6121. doi:10.1021/bi00440a058. PMID   2775758.
  10. Bobek, L; Tsai, H; Biesbrock, A; Levine, M (1993). "Molecular Cloning, Sequence, and Specificity of Expression of the Gene Encoding the Low Molecular Weight Human Salivary Mucin (MUC7)*". Journal of Biological Chemistry. 268 (Sept): 20563–20569. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(20)80762-5 . PMID   7690757.
  11. Shi, Lei; Miller, Carrie; Caldwell, Karin D; Valint, Paul (1999). "Effects of mucin addition on the stability of oil–water emulsions". Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 15 (3–4): 303–312. doi:10.1016/S0927-7765(99)00096-X. ISSN   0927-7765.
  12. Perez E., Proust J. (1987). "Forces between Mica Surfaces Covered with Adsorbed Mucin across Aqueous Solution". Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 118 (1): 182–91. Bibcode:1987JCIS..118..182P. doi:10.1016/0021-9797(87)90447-4. S2CID   95919224.
  13. Gu JM, Robinson JR, Leung SH (1988). "Binding of acrylic polymers to mucin/epithelial surfaces: structure-property relationships". Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 5 (1): 21–67. PMID   3293807.