Bragg v. Linden Lab

Last updated
Bragg v. Linden Research, Inc.
Pennsylvania-eastern.gif
Court United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 30, 2007
Citation(s)487 F. Supp. 2d 593
Holding
The Second Life Terms of Service's mandatory arbitration provision was unenforceable and interaction with a person in a virtual world can satisfy a state's "minimum contacts" requirement for personal jurisdiction.
Court membership
Judge(s) sitting Eduardo C. Robreno
Keywords
Arbitration clause, Personal jurisdiction

Bragg v. Linden Research, Inc., 487 F. Supp. 2d 593 (E.D. Pa. 2007), was a civil action (No. 06-4925) removed to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in October 2006. Linden Lab, an online virtual world service provider of Second Life , terminated the account of user Marc Bragg when Linden Lab discovered that Bragg had found a way to acquire land in the virtual world at a lower-than-market price. The user brought this suit, which was ultimately settled before a final decision was reached. However, the District Court did decide on two issues which may be important in future virtual-world litigation: that the Second Life Terms of Service's mandatory arbitration provision was unenforceable, and that interaction with a person in a virtual world can satisfy a state's "minimum contacts" requirement for personal jurisdiction.

Contents

Facts

In 2006, Pennsylvania lawyer Marc Bragg ("Marc Woebegone" in Second Life) brought a lawsuit against Second Life developer Linden Lab when Bragg's account was unilaterally disabled by Second Life administrators. Linden Lab claimed that Bragg had violated their terms of service by URL-hacking [1] the Second Life virtual land auction website in order to gain access to otherwise-unavailable auctions. As a result, Bragg was able to purchase virtual land within Second Life valued at $1,000 for approximately $300. [2] Bragg's account was suspended while Linden Lab conducted an investigation, and was later closed completely. [2] Bragg argued that, by closing his account, Linden Lab also dissolved his virtual assets, which Bragg valued at between US$4,000 and US$6,000. [2]

Case history

On May 1, 2006, Bragg initially filed his suit in the West Chester District Court in Pennsylvania. [3] After retaining private counsel, Jason A. Archinaco, Bragg refiled on October 4, 2006. His new complaint named Philip Rosedale, the creator of Second Life, as an independent defendant. [4]

On November 7, 2006, Linden Lab responded with three filings: they sought to remove the case to federal court, [5] they sought to dismiss claims against Philip Rosedale due to a lack of personal jurisdiction, [6] and they sought to compel [7] Bragg to participate in mandatory arbitration as outlined in the Second Life Terms of Service. [8]

Bragg opposed the removal and sought to remand the case back to state court. [9] Linden Lab opposed the motion [10] and was successful.

On May 30, 2007, Judge Eduardo C. Robreno of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania denied Rosedale's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, finding that Rosedale met the minimum contacts threshold by virtue of his nationwide personal marketing efforts to publicize Second Life. [11] The Court also denied Linden Lab's motion to compel arbitration, finding that the Terms of Service represented an adhesion contract that was unjustly biased towards Linden Lab. [11] [12]

On October 4, 2007, Linden Lab announced that it reached a confidential settlement with Bragg:

The parties agree that there were unfortunate disagreements and miscommunications regarding the conduct and behavior by both sides and are pleased to report that Mr. Bragg's "Marc Woebegone" account, privileges and responsibilities to the Second Life community have been restored. [13]

Issues raised

Mandatory arbitration provision

Bragg sought to prevent Linden Lab from enforcing its mandatory arbitration provision. He argued that the provision was "both procedurally and substantively unconscionable and is itself evidence of defendants' scheme to deprive Plaintiff (and others) of both their money and their day in court." [11]

Judge Robreno agreed and held that the Terms of Service was a contract of adhesion, noting that the Terms of Service was presented by Linden Lab on a "take-it-or-leave-it-basis." [11] However, he limited this holding by noting that a claim that a contract is one of adhesion can be defeated if there are "reasonably available market alternatives" available to the weaker party. [11] [14] Although there were numerous other online virtual worlds available to Bragg at the time, Judge Robreno noted that Second Life was unique in that it allowed participants to retain property rights in virtual land. [11]

Although some commentators have posited that the court's decision regarding the mandatory arbitration provision will be the seminal decision on the issue for some time, [15] it is unlikely that the decision will have much weight as additional virtual worlds that allow ownership of virtual land begin to compete with Second Life.

Related Research Articles

<i>Step-Saver Data Systems, Inc. v. Wyse Technology</i>

Step-Saver Data Systems, Inc. v. Wyse Technology was a case in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primarily concerned with the enforceability of box-top licenses and end user license agreements (EULA) and their place in U.S. contract law. During the relevant period, Step-Saver Data Systems was a value-added reseller, combining hardware and software from different vendors to offer a fully functioning computer system to various end users. Step-Saver's products included software produced by Software Link, Inc (TSL), computer terminals produced by Wyse Technology, and main computers produced by IBM. The fundamental question raised in this case was whether the shrinkwrap licenses accompanying TSL's software were legally binding, given that different terms were negotiated over the phone with Step-Saver prior to receiving physical copies of the software. The case was first heard in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, where the court ruled that the shrinkwrap licenses were legally binding. However, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit subsequently reversed this decision, ruling that the shrinkwrap licenses were not legally binding.

<i>Second Life</i> 2003 video game

Second Life is an online virtual world, developed and owned by the San Francisco-based firm Linden Lab and launched on June 23, 2003. It saw rapid growth for some years and in 2013 it had approximately one million regular users; growth stabilized and by the end of 2017 active user count had declined to "between 800,000 and 900,000". In many ways, Second Life is similar to massively multiplayer online role-playing games; nevertheless, Linden Lab is emphatic that their creation is not a game: "There is no manufactured conflict, no set objective".

<i>SCO Group, Inc. v. Novell, Inc.</i>

SCO v. Novell was a United States lawsuit in which The SCO Group (SCO) claimed ownership of the source code for the Unix operating system, including portions of Linux. SCO sought to have the court declare that SCO owned the rights to the Unix code, including the copyrights, and that Novell had committed slander of title by claiming those rights for itself.

Philip Rosedale American entrepreneur (born 1968)

Philip Rosedale is an American entrepreneur who founded Linden Lab, which develops and hosts the virtual world Second Life.

Linden Lab

Linden Research, Inc., doing business as Linden Lab, is a privately held American Internet company that is best known as the creator of Second Life.

Anshe Chung

Anshe Chung is an avatar of Ailin Graef in the online world Second Life. Referred to as the Rockefeller of Second Life by a CNN journalist, Graef has built an online business that engages in development, brokerage, and arbitrage of virtual land, items, and currencies, and has been featured in a number of prominent magazines such as Business Week, Fortune and Red Herring.

Teen Second Life was a version of Second Life reserved for teenagers, running on the so-called "Teen Grid." It was officially opened to the public on February 14, 2005 for people aged 13–17 to use Second Life, without entering false information to participate in Second Life . On January 1, 2006, Teen Second Life's operating hours were increased to 24 hours a day, whereas it was previously open only from noon to 10 pm Pacific Time.

The virtual world Second Life has its own economy and a virtual token referred to as Linden Dollars (L$). In the SL economy, users buy from and sell to one another directly, using the Linden, which is a closed-loop virtual token for use only within the Second Life platform. Linden Dollars have no monetary value and are not redeemable for monetary value from Linden Lab. A resident with a surplus of Linden Dollars earned via a Second Life business or experiential play can offer to exchange with other users via the LindeX exchange provided by Linden Lab. This economy is independent of the price of the game, which users pay to Linden Lab, not to each other. Linden Lab reports that the Second Life economy generated US$3,596,674 in economic activity during the month of September 2005, and as of September 2006 Second Life was reported to have a GDP of US$64,000,000.

The Second Life Grid is the platform and technology behind 3D online virtual world Second Life. In April 2008, IBM announced that it would explore future deployment of a portion of the Second Life Grid behind a corporate firewall.

Cory Ondrejka

Cory Ondrejka was the Chief Technology Officer of Linden Lab, makers of Second Life. With Philip Rosedale, Ondrejka co-founded Second Life and played a significant role in the architecture of the product. After leaving Linden Lab, Ondrejka became Senior Vice President of Digital Strategy for the EMI Group until he left EMI in September 2009. He also was vice president of engineering at Facebook.

Kevin Alderman, founder of Eros LLC, is the creator of the avatar of Stroker Serpentine in the virtual world of Second Life.

Greenberg & Lieberman

Greenberg & Lieberman is a national and international law firm based in Washington, D.C. Established in 1996 by Michael Greenberg and Stevan Lieberman, the firm is known for its expertise in the technology-law areas of intellectual property, trademark infringements, domain names, virtual worlds, and software and is among the 16 most influential entities in the field of domain names. A "boutique law firm", Greenberg & Lieberman credited for being among the first in the world to begin generating a significant revenue and client base via online virtual worlds such as Second Life. Greenberg & Lieberman are also noted for their involvement with media law and military law.

<i>Campbell v. General Dynamics Government Systems Corp.</i>

In Campbell v. General Dynamics Gov't Sys. Corp., 407 F.3d 546, the First Circuit had to consider the enforceability of a mandatory arbitration agreement, contained in a dispute resolution policy linked to an e-mailed company-wide announcement, insofar as it applies to employment discrimination claims brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Under the Court's analysis, the question turned on whether the employer provided minimally sufficient notice of the contractual nature of the e-mailed policy and of the concomitant waiver of an employee's right to access a judicial forum. The Court weighed the attendant circumstances; concluded that the notice was wanting and that, therefore, enforcement of the waiver would be inappropriate; and upheld the district court's denial of the employer's motion to stay proceedings and compel the employee to submit his claim to arbitration.

C & L Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizen Band, Potawatomi Indian Tribe of Oklahoma, 532 U.S. 411 (2001), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the tribe waived its sovereign immunity when it agreed to a contract containing an arbitration agreement.

Richard P. Minsky is an American scholar of bookbinding and a book artist. He is the founder of the Center for Book Arts in New York City.

Jason A. Archinaco is an attorney known for the handling of the first virtual property lawsuit in the United States, Bragg v. Linden Research, Inc. That case is believed to have resolved confidentially.

14 Penn Plaza LLC v. Pyett, 556 U.S. 247 (2009), is a US labor law case in the United States Supreme Court on the rights of unionized workers to sue their employer for age discrimination. In this 2009 decision, the Court decided that whenever a union contract "clearly and unmistakably" requires that all age discrimination claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) be decided through arbitration, then employees subject to that contract cannot have those claims heard in court.

<i>Amaretto Ranch Breedables, LLC v. Ozimals, Inc.</i>

Amaretto Ranch Breedables, LLC v. Ozimals, Inc. was a copyright case in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California involving a DMCA takedown notice dispute between companies that produce virtual animals on Second Life. Ozimals filed a DMCA takedown notice to Linden Research, the makers of Second life, claiming that Amaretto's horse infringed on their bunnies and demanding their removal. Consequently, Amaretto responded with a counter-DMCA notice and applied to the court for a temporary restraining order to forbid Linden Research from removing their virtual horses. This was granted and held in effect as the case proceeded. Amaretto claimed in court that Ozimal's DMCA notice was copyright misuse and asked for a declaration that its horses did not infringe copyright. Ozimals counterclaimed for copyright infringement. The court eventually dismissed both claims.

<i>In re Zappos.com, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation</i>

In re Zappos.com, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, 893 F. Supp. 2d 1058, was a United States District Court for the District of Nevada case in which the Court held that Zappos.com's customers were not held to the browsewrap terms of use because of their obscure nature. The courts also held that the agreement was unenforceable because Zappos had reserved the right to change it at any time without informing the customers. This court decision set a precedent for businesses that use browsewrap agreements and/or include a clause in their agreements that allow them to change the agreements at any time. The decision encouraged conversation on how a business should most fairly display its terms of use and how to avoid unfairness and ambiguity when writing them.

Doe et al. v. Trump Corporation et al. is an ongoing case filed in the U.S. District Court for Southern District of New York in October 2018, in which four anonymous plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against the Trump Corporation, Donald Trump and three of his adult children — Donald Jr., Eric and Ivanka — alleging racketeering and of fraudulently encouraging unsophisticated investors to give large amounts of money to organizations connected to the Trumps. It is alleged that the defendants promoted ACN in exchange for millions of dollars in secret payments from 2005 to 2015. The lawsuit says that Trump "told investors that he had 'experienced the opportunity' and 'done a lot of research,' and that his endorsement was 'not for any money.'" However, it subsequently emerged that Trump was a paid spokesman for at least one of the companies whose products and services he was promoting to investors.

References

  1. Dennis G. Jerz, URL-Hacking: Do-it-yourself Navigation (May 18, 2000). Archived March 22, 2009, at the Wayback Machine
  2. 1 2 3 Tateru Nino, Bragg vs Linden Lab - The Story So Far , Second Life Insider (Jan. 27, 2007).
  3. Law Offices of Marc S. Bragg, Virtual Land Dispute Spills Over Into Real World , PR Newswire (May 8, 2006).
  4. Bragg v. Linden Research, Inc. Complaint (Oct. 4, 2006).
  5. Bragg v. Linden Research, Inc. Notice of Removal (Nov. 7, 2006).
  6. Bragg v. Linden Research, Inc. Rosedale's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Nov. 14, 2006).
  7. Bragg v. Linden Research, Inc. Linden's Motion to Compel Arbitration (Nov. 14, 2006).
  8. Second Life Terms of Service Archived 2007-02-15 at WebCite at 7.2.
  9. Bragg v. Linden Research, Inc. Bragg's Motion to Remand (Nov. 20, 2006).
  10. Bragg v. Linden Research, Inc. Linden's Opposition to Bragg's Motion to Remand (Dec. 7, 2006).
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Bragg v. Linden Research, Inc., 487 F. Supp. 2d 593 (E.D.Penn. 2007).
  12. Benjamin Duranske, Bragg v. Linden Update: Defendants' Motions to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration Denied , Virtually Blind (Jun. 1, 2007).
  13. Marty Linden, Resolution of Lawsuit , Second Life Blogs (Oct. 4, 2007).
  14. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Superior Court, 259 Cal. Rptr. 789, 795 (Ct. App. 1989).
  15. Benjamin Duranske, Bragg v. Linden Update: Defendants' Motions to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration Denied , Virtually Blind (Jun. 1, 2007) ("Bottom line is that this is a pretty extraordinary decision which, assuming it survives an almost certain appeal, will likely be cited as the seminal decision in virtual law for the foreseeable future.").