British Film-Makers

Last updated

British Film-Makers (BFM) was a short lived production scheme that operated in Britain in the early 1950s as a co operative venture between the Rank Organisation and the National Film Finance Corporation (NFFC). Its notable films included The Card (1952) and The Malta Story (1953). [1] [2]

Contents

Background

BFM was formed in January 1951. Its nominal capital was divided between General Film Distributors (GFD) (Rank’s distribution company) and the NFFC. Earl St John represented Rank, James Lawrie (managing director of the NFFC) represented the NFFC while Sir Michael Balcon was chairman [3] BFM was one of three production groups involving the NFFC and all operated under similar lines - the others were Elstree Group and Group 3 Films. [4] [5]

GFD would distribute and guarantee 70% of finance, with the NFFC to provide the balance. [6] Each producer/director team was, in theory, given artistic freedom. They received a fixed annual production fee to enable them to carry out the preparatory work, which was absorbed into the budget of their film. [7] In practice, Rank frequently exerted creative control over the films. [8]

The producers associated with BFM included Betty E. Box, Ronald Neame, Anthony Asquith, Anthony Havelock-Allan, Paul Soskin and Thorold Dickinson. They were expected to make six films a year. [4]

Productions

In February 1952 Earl St John announced the company would make a slate of 12 movies at a cost of £1,500,000, including Fanfare for Fig Leaves with Kay Kendall and Ian Hunter (this became It Started in Paradise ), Tonight at 8:30 with Ted Ray (which became Meet Me Tonight), and The Planter's Wife. [9]

The first film funded under the scheme was Appointment with Venus. [10]

Over eighteen months, BFM financed fourteen films, six produced by BFM alone with the remaining eight being co-productions with independent producers. Filmink wrote "it's a little odd there were so many thrillers". [2]

Rank pulled out of the BFM scheme at the end of 1952, claiming it wanted to be "free and independent". [11] This led to the formation of Group Film Productions, a company which became Rank's main producing arm. [12] [13] [14] [15]

According to Rank's biographer:

It [British Film Makers] wasn’t a particularly happy experiment: few of the producer/director teams got on particularly well, and they all resented their contractual obligation to plough any profits they made straight into a central kitty. Nonetheless, as [John] Davis later observed, without the NFFC, ‘there would have been a complete financial collapse of British production’: for all its bureaucratic shortcomings, the NFFC enabled Rank to keep on making pictures, and by 1952 the organization was confident enough to embark on a production programme without this government crutch. [16]

When Rank closed down BFM, the NFFC had recouped only £140,000 of its £706,000 advance although by 31 March 1957, the NFFC’s losses were just £144,339. [17]

According to Sue Harper and Vince Porter, Rank "made a handsome profit on its investment in BFM. Moreover, it afforded [John] Davis and St John the opportunity of selecting their own creative teams and projecting a new image of social reality." [18] Filmink argued:

It offers a possible model on how to make a diverse, broad-appeal local film industry in a smaller country. Namely: put key producing-directing teams under contract so they can pay their living costs while they develop projects; keep budgets reasonable; finance films through a combination of money from government and industry; underpin that industry money with a specific levy on tickets; ensure cinema chains have a say in what is made so they can get behind it. This isn’t the perfect model, but it’s not a bad one. [2]

Rank revived the scheme in the mid 1960s making six films co-financed with the NFFC. [19]

Films

References

  1. Falk, Quentin (1987). The golden gong : fifty years of the Rank Organisation, its films and its stars. p. 87.
  2. 1 2 3 Vagg, Stephen (28 May 2025). "Forgotten British Studios: British Film-Makers". Filmink. Retrieved 28 May 2025.
  3. Harper and Porter p 38
  4. 1 2 "NFFC Prod Scheme seen as solving many of England's filmmaking woes". Variety. 31 January 1951. p. 11.
  5. The British film industry. Political and Economic Planning. 1952. p. 261.
  6. "Company report". The Birmingham Post. 15 October 1951. p. 7.
  7. Harper and Porter p 38
  8. Harper and Porter p 40
  9. "A film man with £1,500,000 to spend". Daily Mirror. 8 February 1952. p. 8.
  10. "Not starting any new pix, Rank has 8 in production, 5 ready for exhibs". Variety. 14 February 1952. p. 13.
  11. "Company report". Daily Herald. 12 October 1953. p. 8.
  12. Harper and Porter p 40
  13. "Finance change for Rank films". The Daily Telegraph. 13 November 1952. p. 18.
  14. "To finance its own films". The Guardian. 13 November 1952. p. 1.
  15. Vagg, Stephen (30 May 2025). "Forgotten British Studios: Group Film Productions". Filmink. Retrieved 30 May 2025.
  16. Macnab, Geoffrey (1993). J. Arthur Rank and the British film industry. Routledge. p. 217. ISBN   978-0-415-07272-4.
  17. Harper and Porter p 40
  18. Harper and Porter p 40
  19. Vagg, Stephen (11 August 2025). "Forgotten British Film Studios: The Rank Organisation, 1965 to 1967". Filmink. Retrieved 11 August 2025.

Notes