British Nutrition Foundation

Last updated
British Nutrition Foundation
AbbreviationBNF
Formation1967
Legal status Registered charity; Company limited by guarantee [1] [2] [3]
PurposeSelf-stated: provision of information on nutrition science; independently described as a food-industry interest group [4]
Location
  • New Derwent House, 69-73 Theobalds Road, London
Region served
UK
CEO
Elaine Hindal
Main organ
BNF Council
Website www.nutrition.org.uk

The British Nutrition Foundation is a British lobby group mainly funded by the food industry. It has been widely criticised for conflicts of interest, and for downplaying them. [4] [5] [6] [7] It presents itself to journalists, the public, and the government as a independent, impartial, disinterested, and scientifically-rigorous; its industry funders also promote this image. [4]

Contents

The BNF has opposed many public-health interventions that might harm food-industry profits, often using tobacco-industry techniques, such as creating unwarranted doubt and uncertainty around the scientific evidence. [6]

In 2023, the BNF had an income of £1.5million, with an expenditure of £1.6million. £0.113million were spent on fundraising. [1]

Government lobbying

The BNF is open about its intention to shape UK Government policy on food, [4] [8] thus serving as a special-interest lobbying group for the food industry, which largely funds the foundation. [4] [5]

20th century

During the Second World War, a great deal of official attention was paid to ensuring that the UK population had adequate nutrition despite the blockade. [9] Food rationing (1940-1953) restricted consumption of animal products, fats, sugar, and tea, and replaced white bread with the wholegrain National Loaf, increasing vegetable and fiber consumption.[ citation needed ] When rationing ended, diets began to change, as did diet-related illness; rates of heart disease, for instance, increased sharply. [9] [10]

The British Nutrition Foundation was set up in 1967.[ citation needed ]

NACNE report

Caroline Walker, secretary to NACNE. In 1983, she challenged a bid to make the BNF officially responsible for nutritional education in Britain, saying the BNF was not fit to advise on nutrition, because it was entirely funded by the food industry. Caroline 83.png
Caroline Walker, secretary to NACNE. In 1983, she challenged a bid to make the BNF officially responsible for nutritional education in Britain, saying the BNF was not fit to advise on nutrition, because it was entirely funded by the food industry.

The National Advisory Committee on Nutrition Education (NACNE) was set up by the British government in 1979, to provide a review of nutritional information and policy. The BNF was allowed to sit on the committee, which was to become controversial. The first draft of NACNE's report was finished in April 1981, and the third draft was leaked to the press in June 1983, after it became plain that it would not be released. [9]

At a BNF annual conference on 22 June 1983, the final official speaker suggested that the British government make the BNF the national body officially responsible for nutritional education. The secretary of NACNE, Caroline Walker, stood up from the audience to respond. She said that as the BNF was entirely sponsored by the food industry, it was not fit to advise the public on nutrition. The conference chair and then-BNF-president, Albert Neuberger, said that her statement was libellious and demanded that she retract it. She refused. [9]

Journalist Geoffrey Cannon, who had a leaked copy of the third draft report, asked about why the conference, on 'Implementing Dietary Guidelines', hadn't mentioned an upcoming report that laid out quantitative nutrition guidelines and regulatory means of reaching them. The BNF director-general (then Derek Shrimpton[ citation needed ]), taken aback, said that the report would not be published by NACNE, but the chair of NACNE's expert sub-committee was free to publish it. [9]

On the 3rd of July, the leaked NACNE draft was reported in the news press; in September, the leaked draft was published in a major medical journal, the Lancet. On the 10th of October, the NACNE report was offically published. Controversy around the suppression continued to generate news stories for some years. [9] [10]

The report recommended regulating the formulation of processed foods (to make them less unhealthy), more explicit nutritional labelling, and incentives for breeding leaner meat. It said that the measures it suggested could halve the average intake of sugar and salt, and reduce the intake of fats by a quarter, replacing them with vegetables, fruit, dietary fiber, and starchy foods. It said that this would significantly reduce obesity, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, stroke, colorectal cancer, and other major diseases, and improve the health of the whole population. [9]

The report also deprecated the term "balanced diet" and contemporary food groups, saying that they were no longer helpful. [9] It said that in the past, when nutritional deficiencies were the major form of diet-related disease, encouraging people to eat a greater variety of foods was useful, because most people who got nutritional deficiencies were eating a narrow range of foods lacking a specific nutrient. In the 1970s, they wrote, that was no longer a major problem in the United Kingdom; people needed to eat healthier foods, not more varied ones. [10]

No official action was taken on the report; the recommendations were not implemented.[ citation needed ]

Derek Shrimpton, who had been BNF director general in this period (1982-1984[ citation needed ]), said in a 1985 interview: "In the period I was there the foundation was solely taken up with defence actions for the industry." He also said that BNF had constantly fought against reductions in sugar, salt, and fat consumption, by constantly frustrating government committees aiming to recommend reductions. [4] [11]

21st century

The UK government has repeatedly paid the BNF to develop educational materials on nutrition. Tim Lobstein, a director at the International Association for the Study of Obesity-International Obesity Task Force (now the World Obesity Federation), said that the BNF has produced educational materials seem to support industry messages. For instance, he said, in 2003 it "did a big piece of work for the Food Standards Agency [a government department] reviewing ‘influences on consumer food choices’ which conveniently left out any review of the influence of marketing and advertising techniques". [4] [12]

In 2005, 26 UK MPs signed an Early Day Motion in Parliament expressing concern over BNF activities, and requesting more transparency. They noted that the BNF was "primarily industry-supported" and was advising the government on [5]

They also noted that members included "McDonalds, Coca-Cola, Northern Foods, Nutrasweet, Kraft, Cadbury-Schweppes, Kelloggs, Nestle, Sainsbury's, Asda and Procter & Gamble". [5]

The Campaign Against Trans Fats in Food said that the BNF opposed regulation of xenobiotic trans fats in a 2009 BFN submission to the Scottish parliament, urging the parliament, which was considering regulation, to do nothing. [4] [14]

The BNF was lobbying against action on ultra-processed foods in 2023, saying there should be no policies on them. [15] [7] The BNF has argued that since poor people are economically forced to eat ultra-processed foods, taking regulatory measures to increase the consumption of non-UPF foods will increase inequality. It has also argued that publicly condemning of ultra-processed foods as unhealthy will make poor people feel stigmatized and guilty for not eating a financially-unacheivable diet. Opponents argue that poor people should not be economically forced to eat unhealthy foods, and policy should take that as its goal. [6] : 380 

Media influence

The media seek out the British Nutrition Foundation as a ready source of authoritative comment on matters of nutrition and wider food policy. In return the foundation swiftly delivers succinct analysis in a language that suits its audience and does not offend either its partners in Whitehall [the British government] or its paymasters in the food industry. It is a relationship that shows every sign of continuing.

A 2010 British Medical Journal article, also published in a shortened form in The Independent [4] [16]

The BNF presents itself to the media as a disinterested commentator. It focusses on providing swift and expert advice to journalists who are not specialist medical reporters. [4] [16]

The BNF's statements have been described as "artfully true", using technical scientific terminology to creating a misleading impression of uncertainty, even when the scientific evidence is as clear-cut as the link between lung cancer and smoking. [6]

It is often treated by the media as a source of impartial nutritional information. When it is quoted in the media, it is usually just as the "British Nutritional Foundation"; a 2010 search found that only 2/128 media mentions of the BNF mentioned that it has industry funding. [4] [16]

Member-funders may have significant conflicts of interest; for instance, the BNF organized a 2010 conference on sweeteners without conspicuously disclosing that its funders include then-sugar-manufacturers Tate & Lyle and British Sugar, and artificial sweetener manufacturers Ajinomoto (Aminosweet-brand aspartame) and McNeil Consumer Nutritionals (Splenda), and sweet-drinks manfacturers Coca-cola and Pepsi. It presented itself as objective and evidence-based. [4] [16]

The BNF also contributed to a controversial 2023 industry-funded panel that generated more-positive media coverage of ultra-processed foods. Such foods are manufactured or retailed by many BNF members. [17]

Direct-to-consumer marketing

The BNF contributes extensively to materials aimed at the general public. It describes itself as a supporter of informed consumer choice. For instance, it contributed to the PhunkyFoods campaign, aimed at under-11-year-olds and funded by Nestlé, Northern Foods, and Cargill. It has also channeled industry funding for government programs such as "License to Cook" (www.licencetocook.org.uk), a school cookbook for 11-to-12-year-olds. [4] The BNF's "Healthy Eating week" in 2023 was sponsored by processed-food companies including Coca-Cola. [6]

The BNF argues that "There is no such thing as a bad food, only a bad diet", and presents itself as a champion of individual choice, opposing government regulation. [4] These are both standard food-industry messages, based on those used by the tobacco industry. They are used to shift blame for the public health harms cause by unhealthy food from producers and regulators onto the consumer. [15]

Academic journal

The official journal of the BNF, Nutrition Bulletin, describes itself as an international, peer-reviewed journal. It is published quarterly by Wiley. [18] It says that its coverage has included review articles and news items on nutrition, but that since acquisition of an impact factor and MEDLINE coverage, an increasing number of papers reporting original research have been included; [19] many articles are open-access.

Articles in the Nutrition Review may be publicized in press releases put out by the BNF, and garner substantial media coverage. The quality of the scholarship and peer review in the journal has been questioned. [20] [ better source needed ]

Staffing and governance

Many members of the British Nutrition Foundation's staff, including the board of trustees and oversight committees, are or have been employees of the food industry. It is common for staff to move back and forth between the BNF and industry jobs. For instance, Paul Hebblethwaite, as of 2009 a member of the BNF board of trustees and its former chairman, has had "a distinguished career in the food industry working for a number of major companies including Cadbury-Schweppes and Chivers-Hartley", and was simultaneously chairman of the Biscuit, Cake, Chocolate and Confectionery Trade Association. [4]

Under its Memorandum and Articles of Association, the BNF Board has no more than 12 Trustees. Two are allowed to be currently working in the food industry; there are no restrictions on past and future employment. [4] The BNF website says that trustees are appointed by the Board and serve for a term of three years, with each Trustee able to serve for a maximum of nine years, [21] and that the BNF also has an Editorial Advisory Board, educational working groups, and a "register of interests" for Board members and senior managers. [22]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Junk food</span> Unhealthy food high in sugar or fat

"Junk food" is a term used to describe food that is high in calories from macronutrients such as sugar and fat, and often also high in sodium, making it hyperpalatable, and low in dietary fiber, protein, or micronutrients such as vitamins and minerals. It is also known as "high in fat, salt and sugar food". The term junk food is a pejorative dating back to the 1950s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Convenience food</span> Processed food designed for ease of preparation and consumption

Convenience food is food that is commercially prepared for ease of consumption, and is usually ready to eat without further preparation. It may also be easily portable, have a long shelf life, or offer a combination of such convenient traits. Convenience foods include ready-to-eat dry products, frozen food such as TV dinners, shelf-stable food, prepared mixes such as cake mix, and snack food. Food scientists now consider most of these products to be ultra-processed foods and link them to poor health outcomes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Food processing</span> Transformation of raw ingredients into a food like product, or of food into other forms

Food processing is the transformation of agricultural products into food, or of one form of food into other forms. Food processing takes many forms, from grinding grain into raw flour, home cooking, and complex industrial methods used in the making of convenience foods. Some food processing methods play important roles in reducing food waste and improving food preservation, thus reducing the total environmental impact of agriculture and improving food security.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthy diet</span> Type of diet

A healthy diet is a diet that maintains or improves overall health. A healthy diet provides the body with essential nutrition: fluid, macronutrients such as protein, micronutrients such as vitamins, and adequate fibre and food energy.

The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) is a Washington, D.C.–based non-profit watchdog and consumer advocacy group that advocates for safer and healthier foods.

The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics is a multi-unit enterprise that includes a 501(c)(6) trade association in the United States. With over 112,000 members, the association claims to be the largest organization of food and nutrition professionals. It has registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs), nutrition and dietetics technicians registered (NDTRs), and other dietetics professionals as members. Founded in 1917 as the American Dietetic Association, the organization officially changed its name to the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics in 2012. According to the group's website, about 65% of its members are RDNs, and another 2% are NDTRs. The group's primary activities include providing testimony at hearings, lobbying the United States Congress and other governmental bodies, commenting on proposed regulations, and publishing statements on various topics pertaining to food and nutrition.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Canada's Food Guide</span> Diet planning document produced by Health Canada

Canada's Food Guide is a nutrition guide produced by Health Canada. In 2007, it was reported to be the second most requested Canadian government publication, behind the Income Tax Forms. The Health Canada website states: "Food guides are basic education tools that are designed to help people follow a healthy diet."

A fat tax is a tax or surcharge that is placed upon fattening food, beverages or on overweight individuals. It is considered an example of Pigovian taxation. A fat tax aims to discourage unhealthy diets and offset the economic costs of obesity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gary Taubes</span> American science writer (born 1956)

Gary Taubes is an American journalist, writer, and low-carbohydrate / high-fat (LCHF) diet advocate. His central claim is that carbohydrates, especially sugar and high-fructose corn syrup, overstimulate the secretion of insulin, causing the body to store fat in fat cells and the liver, and that it is primarily a high level of dietary carbohydrate consumption that accounts for obesity and other metabolic syndrome conditions. He is the author of Nobel Dreams (1987); Bad Science: The Short Life and Weird Times of Cold Fusion (1993); Good Calories, Bad Calories (2007), titled The Diet Delusion (2008) in the UK and Australia; Why We Get Fat: And What to Do About It (2010); The Case Against Sugar (2016); and The Case for Keto: Rethinking Weight Control and the Science and Practice of Low-Carb/High-Fat Eating (2020). Taubes's work often goes against accepted scientific, governmental, and popular tenets such as that obesity is caused by eating too much and exercising too little and that excessive consumption of fat, especially saturated fat in animal products, leads to cardiovascular disease.

Obesity in Mexico is a relatively recent phenomenon, having been widespread since the 1980s with the introduction of ultra-processed food into much of the Mexican food market. Prior to that, dietary issues were limited to under and malnutrition, which is still a problem in various parts of the country. Following trends already ongoing in other parts of the world, Mexicans have been foregoing the traditional Mexican diet high in whole grains, fruits, legumes and vegetables in favor of a diet with more animal products and ultra-processed foods. It has seen dietary energy intake and rates of overweight and obese people rise with seven out of ten at least overweight and a third clinically obese.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Yudkin</span> British physiologist and nutritionist

John Yudkin FRSC was a British physiologist and nutritionist, and the founding Professor of the Department of Nutrition at Queen Elizabeth College, London.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diet and obesity</span> Effect of diet on obesity

Diet plays an important role in the genesis of obesity. Personal choices, food advertising, social customs and cultural influences, as well as food availability and pricing all play a role in determining what and how much an individual eats.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sweetened beverage</span> Type of beverage

Sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) are beverages with added sugar. They have been described as "liquid candy". Added sugars include brown sugar, corn sweetener, corn syrup, dextrose, fructose, high fructose corn syrup, honey, invert sugar, lactose, malt syrup, maltose, molasses, raw sugar, sucrose, trehalose, and turbinado sugar. Naturally occurring sugars, such as those in fruit or milk, are not considered to be added sugars. Free sugars include monosaccharides and disaccharides added to foods and beverages by the manufacturer, cook or consumer, and sugars naturally present in honey, syrups, fruit juices and fruit juice concentrates.

Barry Michael Popkin is an American nutrition and obesity researcher at the Carolina Population Center and the W.R. Kenan Jr. Distinguished Professor of Nutrition at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Public Health, where he is the director of the Global Food Research Program. He developed the concept of "nutrition transition". He is the author of over 650 journal articles and a book, The World is Fat, translated into a dozen languages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aseem Malhotra</span> British cardiologist and writer

Aseem Malhotra is a British cardiologist, health campaigner, and author, who became well known during the COVID-19 pandemic after being accused of spreading misinformation about COVID-19 vaccinations. He contends that people should reduce sugar in their diet, adopt a low-carb and high-fat diet, and reduce their use of prescription drugs. He was the first science director of Action on Sugar in 2014, was listed as one of The Sunday Times 500 most influential people in 2016, and was twice recognized as one of the top fifty black and minority ethnic community member pioneers in the UK's National Health Service by the Health Service Journal. Malhotra is co-author of a book called The Pioppi Diet.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ultra-processed food</span> Industrially formulated edible substance

An ultra-processed food (UPF) is an industrially formulated edible substance derived from natural food or synthesized from other organic compounds. The resulting products are designed to be highly profitable, convenient, and hyperpalatable, often through food additives such as preservatives, colourings, and flavourings. UPFs have often undergone processes such as moulding/extruding, hydrogenation or frying.

<i>Pure, White and Deadly</i> Book on health problems from sugar consumption

Pure, White and Deadly is a 1972 book by John Yudkin, a British nutritionist and former Chair of Nutrition at Queen Elizabeth College, London. Published in New York, it was the first publication by a scientist to anticipate the adverse health effects, especially in relation to obesity and heart disease, of the public's increased sugar consumption. At the time of publication, Yudkin sat on the advisory panel of the British Department of Health's Committee on the Medical Aspects of Food and Nutrition Policy (COMA). He stated his intention in writing the book in the last paragraph of the first chapter: "I hope that when you have read this book I shall have convinced you that sugar is really dangerous."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sugar marketing</span> Marketing of sugar

Sugar is heavily marketed both by sugar producers and the producers of sugary drinks and foods. Apart from direct marketing methods such as messaging on packaging, television ads, advergames, and product placement in setting like blogs, industry has worked to steer coverage of sugar-related health information in popular media, including news media and social media.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Geoffrey Cannon</span> English journalist and scholar

Geoffrey Cannon is an English author, journalist and former magazine editor, and scholar. From 1968 to 1972, he was the music critic for The Guardian, a role that made him the first dedicated rock critic at a British daily newspaper. Having worked as the arts editor for New Society magazine, he became editor of the BBC publication Radio Times from 1969 to 1979. During that time, he also wrote on music and popular culture for The Listener, the Los Angeles Times, the Chicago Sun-Times, Creem, Rock et Folk, Melody Maker and Time Out.

<i>Eating You Alive</i> 2018 American film

Eating You Alive is a 2018 health documentary film about why Americans are suffering from chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, obesity, autoimmune disease, among other diseases, and whether the outcome can be changed.

References

  1. 1 2 "British Nutrition Foundation, registered charity no. 251681". Charity Commission for England and Wales.
  2. ↑ "British Nutrition Foundation, Registered Charity no. SC040061". Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator.
  3. ↑ "BRITISH NUTRITION FOUNDATION (THE) overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK" . Retrieved 2 September 2023.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Chamberlain, Phil (22 March 2010). "Independence of nutritional information?". London: British Medical Journal. Archived from the original on 25 April 2012. Retrieved 30 August 2023.
  5. 1 2 3 4 "British Nutrition Foundation. EDM (Early Day Motion)278: tabled on 07 June 2005". UK Parliament. Retrieved 30 August 2023.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 Tulleken, Chris van (27 April 2023). Ultra-Processed People. Cornerstone. ISBN   9781529900057.; the 2024 appendix discusses the BNF extensively, and the index lists mentions in the body text.
  7. 1 2 Nestle, Marion (5 September 2023). "British Nutrition Foundation vs. concept of Ultra-Processed Food". Food Politics. Retrieved 31 August 2024.
  8. ↑ "Who we are, what we do". London: British Nutrition Foundation. 2009. Retrieved 4 April 2011.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Cannon, Geoffrey. "History. Policy. NACNE". www.wphna.org. World Public Health Nutrition Association . Retrieved 30 August 2024.
  10. 1 2 3 "Nutrition: The Changing Scene". The Lancet. 322 (8352): 719–721. 24 September 1983. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(83)92256-0. ISSN   0140-6736 . Retrieved 30 August 2024. (see also pages 782-784, 835-838, and 902-905 for other installments)
  11. ↑ Cannon, G (1987). The Politics of Food. London: Century. p. 356. ISBN   978-0712612104.; former 10-digit ISBN was ISBN   0712612106. An interview with Derek Shrimpton in a 1985 World in Action documentary[ full citation needed ] is quoted extensively in The Politics of Food
  12. ↑ Chamberlain, Phil; Laurance, Jeremy (22 March 2010). "Is the British Nutrition Foundation having its cake and eating it too?". The Independent . Retrieved 30 August 2023.
  13. ↑ Tedstone, Alison (16 October 2014). "How to become a Registered Nutritionist – UK Health Security Agency". ukhsa.blog.gov.uk. Retrieved 17 August 2024.
  14. ↑ Chamberlain, Phil; Laurance, Jeremy (22 March 2010). "Is the British Nutrition Foundation having its cake and eating it too?". The Independent . Retrieved 30 August 2023.
  15. 1 2 "Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Avoiding conflict of interest in nutrition research | ANH Academy". www.anh-academy.org. Retrieved 17 August 2024.
  16. 1 2 3 4 Chamberlain, Phil; Laurance, Jeremy (22 March 2010). "Is the British Nutrition Foundation having its cake and eating it too?". The Independent (UK ed.). Retrieved 30 August 2023.
  17. ↑ Coombes, Rebecca (1 November 2023). "Row over ultra-processed foods panel highlights conflicts of interest issue at heart of UK science reporting". BMJ. 383: 2514. doi:10.1136/bmj.p2514. PMID   37914181 . Retrieved 17 August 2024.
  18. ↑ "Nutrition Bulletin - Wiley Online Library" . Retrieved 30 August 2023.
  19. ↑ de la Hunty, Anne (2023). "Expanding our editorial capacity". Nutrition Bulletin (editorial). 48 (3): 314–316. doi: 10.1111/nbu.12631 . PMID   37593825.
  20. ↑ Briffa, Dr John (26 September 2012). "The head of the British Nutrition Foundation responds to my blog post on bread, and I have a few words for her too - Dr Briffa's Blog - A Good Look at Good Health". Archived from the original on September 27, 2012. Retrieved 17 August 2024.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  21. ↑ British Nutrition Foundation 2022, p. 14.
  22. ↑ British Nutrition Foundation 2022, pp. 14–15.

Sources

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.