The British Nutrition Foundation is a British lobby group mainly funded by the food industry. It has been widely criticised for conflicts of interest, and for downplaying them.[4][5][6][7] It presents itself to journalists, the public, and the government as a independent, impartial, disinterested, and scientifically-rigorous; its industry funders also promote this image.[4]
In 2023, the BNF had an income of £1.5million, with an expenditure of £1.6million. £0.113million were spent on fundraising.[1]
Government lobbying
Caroline Walker, secretary to NACNE. At a BNF annual meeting in 1983, she said that the BNF was not fit to advise on nutrition, because it was entirely funded by the food industry.
The BNF is open about its intention to shape UK Government policy on food,[4][8] thus serving as a special-interest lobbying group for the food industry, which largely funds the foundation.[4][5]
The National Advisory Committee on Nutrition Education (NACNE) was set up by the British government in 1979, to provide a review of nutritional information and policy. The BNF was allowed to sit on the committee, which was to become controversial. The first draft of NACNE's report was finished in April 1981, and the third draft was leaked to the press in June 1983, after it became plain that it would not be released.[9]
At the BNF annual conference on 22 June 1983, the final official speaker suggested that the British government make the BNF the national body officially responsible for nutritional eduction. The secretary of NACNE, Caroline Walker, stood up from the audience to respond. She said that as the BNF was entirely sponsored by the food industry, it was not fit to advise the public on nutrition. The conference chair and then-BNF-president, Albert Neuberger, said that her statement was libellious and demanded that she retract it. She refused. Journalist Geoffrey Cannon, who had a leaked copy of the third draft report, asked about why the conference, on the implementation of dietary guidelines, hadn't mentioned an upcoming report that laid out quantitative nutrition guidelines and regulatory means of reaching them. The BNF director-general (then Derek Shrimpton[citation needed]), taken aback, said that it would not be published by NACNE, but the chair of NACNE's expert sub-committee was free to publish it.[9]
On the 3rd of July, the leaked NACNE draft was reported in the news press; in September, the leaked draft was published in a major medical journal, the Lancet. On the 10th of October, the NACNE report was offically published. Controversy around the suppression continued to generate news stories for some years.[9][10]
Derek Shrimpton, who had been BNF director general in this period (1982-1984[citation needed]), said in a 1985 interview: "In the period I was there the foundation was solely taken up with defence actions for the industry." He also said that BNF had constantly fought against reductions in sugar, salt, and fat consumption, by constantly frustrating government committees aiming to recommend reductions.[4][11]
The UK government has repeatedly paid the BNF to develop educational materials on nutrition. Tim Lobstein, a director at the International Association for the Study of Obesity-International Obesity Task Force (now the World Obesity Federation), said that the BNF has produced educational materials seem to support industry messages. For instance, he said, in 2003 it "did a big piece of work for the Food Standards Agency [a government department] reviewing ‘influences on consumer food choices’ which conveniently left out any review of the influence of marketing and advertising techniques".[4][12]
In 2005, 26 UK MPs signed an Early Day Motion in Parliament expressing concern over BNF activities, and requesting more transparency. They noted that the BNF was "primarily industry-supported" and was advising the government on[5]
The BNF was lobbying against action on ultra-processed foods in 2023, saying there should be no policies on them.[15][7]
Media influence
The media seek out the British Nutrition Foundation as a ready source of authoritative comment on matters of nutrition and wider food policy. In return the foundation swiftly delivers succinct analysis in a language that suits its audience and does not offend either its partners in Whitehall[the British government] or its paymasters in the food industry. It is a relationship that shows every sign of continuing.
The BNF presents itself to the media as a disinterested commentator. It focusses on providing swift and expert advice to journalists who are not specialist medical reporters.[4][16]
The BNF's statements have been described as "artfully true", using technical scientific terminology to creating a misleading impression of uncertainty, even when the scientific evidence is as clear-cut as the link between lung cancer and smoking.[6]
It is often treated by the media as a source of impartial nutritional information. When it is quoted in the media, it is usually just as the "British Nutritional Foundation"; a 2010 search found that only 2/128 media mentions of the BNF mentioned that it has industry funding.[4][16]
Member-funders may have significant conflicts of interest; for instance, the BNF organized a 2010 conference on sweeteners without conspicuously disclosing that its funders include then-sugar-manufacturers Tate & Lyle and British Sugar, and artificial sweetener manufacturers Ajinomoto (Aminosweet-brand aspartame) and McNeil Consumer Nutritionals (Splenda), and sweet-drinks manfacturers Coca-cola and Pepsi. It presented itself as objective and evidence-based.[4][16]
The BNF also contributed to a controversial 2023 industry-funded panel that generated more-positive media coverage of ultra-processed foods. Such foods are manufactured or retailed by many BNF members.[17]
The BNF contributes extensively to materials aimed at the general public. It describes itself as a supporter of informed consumer choice. For instance, it contributed to the PhunkyFoods campaign, aimed at under-11-year-olds and funded by Nestlé, Northern Foods, and Cargill. It has also channeled industry funding for government programs such as "License to Cook" (www.licencetocook.org.uk), a school cookbook for 11-to-12-year-olds.[4]
The BNF argues that "There is no such thing as a bad food, only a bad diet", and presents itself as a champion of individual choice, opposing government regulation.[4] These are both standard food-industry messages, based on those used by the tobacco industry. They are used to shift blame for the public health harms cause by unhealthy food from producers and regulators onto the consumer.[15]
The official journal of the BNF, Nutrition Bulletin, describes itself as an international, peer-reviewed journal. It is published quarterly by Wiley.[18] It says that its coverage has included review articles and news items on nutrition, but that since acquisition of an impact factor and MEDLINE coverage, an increasing number of papers reporting original research have been included;[19] many articles are open-access.
Articles in the Nutrition Review may be publicized in press releases put out by the BNF, and garner substantial media coverage. The quality of the scholarship and peer review in the journal has been questioned.[20][bettersourceneeded]
Staffing and governance
Many members of the British Nutrition Foundation's staff, including the board of trustees and oversight committees, are or have been employees of the food industry. It is common for staff to move back and forth between the BNF and industry jobs. For instance, Paul Hebblethwaite, as of 2009[update] a member of the BNF board of trustees and its former chairman, has had "a distinguished career in the food industry working for a number of major companies including Cadbury-Schweppes and Chivers-Hartley", and was simultaneously chairman of the Biscuit, Cake, Chocolate and Confectionery Trade Association.[4]
Under its Memorandum and Articles of Association, the BNF Board has no more than 12 Trustees. Two are allowed to be currently working in the food industry; there are no restrictions on past and future employment.[4] The BNF website says that trustees are appointed by the Board and serve for a term of three years, with each Trustee able to serve for a maximum of nine years,[21] and that the BNF also has an Editorial Advisory Board, educational working groups, and a "register of interests" for Board members and senior managers.[22]
Related Research Articles
The International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) is an international research institute or think tank focusing on defence and security issues. Since 1997, its headquarters have been at Arundel House in London. It has offices on four continents, producing data and research on questions of defence, security and global affairs, publishing publications and online analysis, and convening major security summits. The Guardian newspaper has described the IISS as ‘one of the world’s leading security think tanks.’
The Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) is a right-wing, free market think tank registered as a UK charity. Associated with the New Right, the IEA describes itself as an "educational research institute" and says that it seeks to "further the dissemination of free-market thinking" by "analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems". The IEA is the oldest free market think-tank in the UK and was established to promote free-market responses to economic challenges by targeting influential academics and journalists, as well as students, in order to propagate these ideas widely. Adopting as its credo FA Hayek's view that "yesterday's dissent becomes today's consensus," the IEA says that it prioritises producing work with a focus on economic insights over partisan politics.
War on Want is an anti-poverty charity based in London. War on Want works to challenge the root causes of poverty, inequality and injustice through partnership with social movements in the global South and campaigns in the UK. War on Want's slogan is "poverty is political" and its stated focus is on the root causes of poverty rather than its effects.
Islamic Relief Worldwide is a faith-inspired humanitarian and development agency which is working to support and empower the world's most vulnerable people.
The British Heart Foundation (BHF) is a cardiovascular research charity in the United Kingdom. It funds medical research related to heart and circulatory diseases and their risk factors, and runs influencing work aimed at shaping public policy and raising awareness.
A food bank is a non-profit, charitable organization that distributes food to those who have difficulty purchasing enough to avoid hunger, usually through intermediaries like food pantries and soup kitchens. Some food banks distribute food directly with their food pantries.
Associated British Foods plc (ABF) is a British multinational food processing and retailing company headquartered in London, England.
The Science Media Centre is a charitable company, first formed in 2002, two years after the United Kingdom House of Lords Select committee on Science and Technology's third report on "Science and Society" in 2000.
Interpal is the working name for Palestinian Relief and Development Fund, a British charity founded in 1994 that describes itself as a non-political charity to alleviate problems faced by Palestinians, and focused solely on the provision of relief and development aid to the poor and needy Palestinians the world over, but primarily in the Palestinian territories, Lebanon and Jordan.
Muslim Aid is a UK faith based International Non-Governmental Organization. It acts as an international humanitarian charity with relief and development programmes in countries across Africa, Asia, and Europe. The charity works to support people suffering the effects of poverty, war, and natural disaster through both emergency relief and sustainable programmes designed to provide long-term support and independent futures to the most vulnerable communities around the world.
The King's Foundation is an educational charity established in 1986 by King Charles III to teach and demonstrate in practice those principles of traditional urban design and architecture which put people and the communities of which they are part at the centre of the design process.
Sir Andrew Thomas Cahn, KCMG is chair of the board of governors of Birkbeck, University of London, and a former senior civil servant.
Keeping Kids Company (in liquidation), formerly Kids Company, was an incorporated and registered charity, founded by Camila Batmanghelidjh in 1996 to provide support to deprived inner city children. From its original "drop-in" centre in south London it expanded over the following two decades to be a prominent children's charity operating 11 centres, mostly within Greater London, but also in Bristol and Liverpool. The charity claimed that from 2011 it was supporting 36,000 children per year, although this figure is disputed. Funding was provided by businesses and through government grants.
King Charles III Charitable Fund (KCCF), formerly known as The Prince of Wales’s Charitable Fund, is a United Kingdom-based charity fund. It provides grants to charity organisations in the United Kingdom and internationally. Grantee organisations vary in focus but fall under the umbrella of one of the Fund's designated funding themes.
FareShare is a charity network established in 1994 that aims to relieve food poverty and reduce food waste in the United Kingdom. It does this by obtaining good-quality surplus food from the food industry that would otherwise have gone to waste and sending it to frontline charities and community groups across the UK.
The Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) is a charitable organisation in the United Kingdom whose aims are to challenge what it calls "extremely damaging and harmful policies" envisaged by governments to mitigate anthropogenic global warming. The GWPF, and some of its prominent members individually, have been characterised as practising and promoting climate change denial.
The Institute for Food, Brain and Behaviour ("IFBB") is a Registered Charity with the primary focus of commissioning research into how food, nutrition and diet can affect brain function and behaviour.
Aseem Malhotra is a controversial British cardiologist, health campaigner, author, and, contrary to public health consensus, an anti-mRNA vaccine activist. He contends that people should reduce sugar in their diet, adopt a low-carb and high-fat diet, and reduce their use of prescription drugs. He was the first science director of Action on Sugar in 2014, was listed as one of The Sunday Times 500 most influential people in 2016, and was twice recognized as one of the top fifty black and minority ethnic community member pioneers in the UK's National Health Service by the Health Service Journal. Malhotra is co-author of a book called The Pioppi Diet.
Dorothy Frances Hollingsworth was a British nutritionist and scientist, who demonstrated that the quality of the British diet was greatly improved by rationing. Hollingsworth both documented and contributed to the improvements in British nutrition during the Second World War. She worked with Jack Drummond at the Ministry of Food during the 1940s, and completed a revised edition of The Englishman's Food after Drummond's death. For twenty-one years, she was responsible for the nutrition bureau at the Ministry of Food and later, in the 1970s, became the director of the British Nutrition Foundation.
The Inter Faith Network for the United Kingdom was a registered charity in the United Kingdom which had the objects "to advance public knowledge and mutual understanding of the teachings, traditions and practices of the different faith communities in Britain including an awareness both of their distinctive features and their common ground and to promote good relations between persons of different faiths". Since 2001, the Inter Faith Network was funded in several millions of pounds by the British government.
1 2 3 Tulleken, Chris van (27 April 2023). Ultra-Processed People. Cornerstone. ISBN9781529900057.; the 2024 appendix discusses the BNF extensively, and the index lists mentions in the body text.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
