Ultra-processed food

Last updated

Bowl of Froot Loops cereal, an ultra-processed food Froot-Loops-Cereal-Bowl.jpg
Bowl of Froot Loops cereal, an ultra-processed food
Aisle of ultra-processed foods in an American supermarket Walmart Wenatchee.jpg
Aisle of ultra-processed foods in an American supermarket

Ultra-processed food (UPF) is an industrially formulated edible substance derived from natural food or synthesized from other organic compounds. [1] [2] The resulting products are designed to be highly profitable, convenient, and hyperpalatable, often through food additives such as preservatives, colourings, and flavourings. [3]

Contents

The state of research into ultra-processed foods and their effects is evolving rapidly as of 2024. [4] [5] Epidemiological data suggest that consumption of ultra-processed foods is associated with higher risks of many diseases, including obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and specific cancers. [6] Additionally, growing bodies of data point to food addiction associated with consumption of ultra-processed foods, especially among youth. [7] [8] [9] Also, researchers present ultra-processing as a facet of environmental degradation caused by the food industry. [10]

Definitions

Concerns around food processing have existed since at least the Industrial Revolution. [11] Many critics identified 'processed food' as problematic, and movements such as raw foodism attempted to eschew food processing entirely, but since even basic cookery results in processed food, this concept failed in itself to influence public policy surrounding the epidemiology of obesity.[ citation needed ]

Michael Pollan's influential book The Omnivore's Dilemma referred to highly processed industrial food as 'edible food-like substances'. [12] Carlos Augusto Monteiro cited Pollan as an influence in coining the term 'ultra-processed food' in a 2009 commentary. [13] Monteiro's team developed the Nova classification for grouping unprocessed and processed foods beginning in 2010, whose definition of ultra-processing has become most widely accepted and has gradually become more refined through successive publications. [14] The identification of ultra-processed foods, as well as the category itself, is a subject of debate among nutrition and public health scientists, and other definitions have been proposed. [15]

A survey of systems for classifying levels of food processing in 2021 identified four 'defining themes':

  1. Extent of change (from natural state);
  2. Nature of change (properties, adding ingredients);
  3. Place of processing (where/by whom);
  4. Purpose of processing (why, essential/cosmetic). [16]

Of the various systems they surveyed, the researchers found that only the Nova classification takes all four themes into account.

Monteiro's 2009 commentary

Carlos Monteiro, working with a team of researchers at the University of São Paulo, first published the concept of ultra-processed foods in a 2009 invited commentary for Public Health Nutrition :

Ultra-processed foods are basically confections of group 2 ingredients [substances extracted from whole foods], typically combined with sophisticated use of additives, to make them edible, palatable, and habit-forming. They have no real resemblance to group 1 foods [minimally processed foods], although they may be shaped, labelled and marketed so as to seem wholesome and 'fresh'. Unlike the ingredients included in group 2, ultra-processed foods are typically not consumed with or as part of minimally processed foods, dishes and meals. On the contrary, they are designed to be ready-to-eat (sometimes with addition of liquid such as milk) or ready-to-heat, and are often consumed alone or in combination (such as savoury snacks with soft drinks, bread with burgers). [13]

This definition is as much social as one based on specific ingredients, which makes the understanding of ultra-processed foods highly intuitive, even among untrained consumers. [17] [18] A letter responding to Monteiro's 2009 commentary suggested that the definition 'lacks precision', since it lacks the measurable definitions of traditional food science. [19] Because of this, researchers disagree whether the definition can form a valid basis for scientific control. [20] Researchers have developed a quantitative definition for hyperpalatable food, but not for ultra-processed food. [21]

Nova classification

Label for Nova group 4, 'ultra-processed foods' NOVA group 4.svg
Label for Nova group 4, 'ultra-processed foods'

Monteiro's team subsequently presented ultra-processed foods as a group in the Nova food classification system. [22] The system focuses on food processing rather than foods types or nutrients. Nova categorizes foods into four groups: [3]

  1. Unprocessed or minimally processed foods
  2. Processed culinary ingredients
  3. Processed foods
  4. Ultra-processed foods

Nova is an open classification that refines its definitions gradually through new scientific publications rather than through a central advisory board. [14] The most recent overview of Nova published with Monteiro defines ultra-processed food as follows:

Industrially manufactured food products made up of several ingredients (formulations) including sugar, oils, fats and salt (generally in combination and in higher amounts than in processed foods) and food substances of no or rare culinary use (such as high-fructose corn syrup, hydrogenated oils, modified starches and protein isolates). Group 1 foods are absent or represent a small proportion of the ingredients in the formulation. Processes enabling the manufacture of ultra-processed foods include industrial techniques such as extrusion, moulding and pre-frying; application of additives including those whose function is to make the final product palatable or hyperpalatable such as flavours, colourants, non-sugar sweeteners and emulsifiers; and sophisticated packaging, usually with synthetic materials. Processes and ingredients here are designed to create highly profitable (low-cost ingredients, long shelf-life, emphatic branding), convenient (ready-to-(h)eat or to drink), tasteful alternatives to all other Nova food groups and to freshly prepared dishes and meals. Ultra-processed foods are operationally distinguishable from processed foods by the presence of food substances of no culinary use (varieties of sugars such as fructose, high-fructose corn syrup, 'fruit juice concentrates', invert sugar, maltodextrin, dextrose and lactose; modified starches; modified oils such as hydrogenated or interesterified oils; and protein sources such as hydrolysed proteins, soya protein isolate, gluten, casein, whey protein and 'mechanically separated meat') or of additives with cosmetic functions (flavours, flavour enhancers, colours, emulsifiers, emulsifying salts, sweeteners, thickeners and anti-foaming, bulking, carbonating, foaming, gelling and glazing agents) in their list of ingredients. [23]

The Nova definition of ultra-processed food does not comment on the nutritional content of food and is not intended to be used for nutrient profiling. [24]

International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)

The International Agency for Research on Cancer, an intergovernmental agency that forms part of the World Health Organization, classifies foods by their degree of processing. This system breaks food into 'non-processed', 'moderately processed', and 'highly processed' food. [25] The system does not take into account the nature or purpose of changes. [26]

Siga Index

The Siga Index is a classification system for processed foods developed in France in 2018. [27] It is based on both the degree of processing and the nutritional quality of foods, using a holistic and reductionist approach. [28]

The Siga Index assigns a score from 1 to 100 to each food product, where higher scores indicate higher nutritional quality and lower processing. The Siga Index also defines ultra-processed foods (UPFs) as those with a score below 40, which are considered to have low nutritional value and high levels of additives, preservatives, and artificial ingredients. [29]

International Food Information Council (IFIC)

The International Food Information Council defines five levels of food processing: [30] [31]

  1. Minimally processed
  2. Foods processed for preservation
  3. Mixtures of combined ingredients
  4. Ready-to-eat processed foods
  5. Prepared foods/meals

NUPENS

The Center for Epidemiological Research in Nutrition and Health at the University of São Paulo has proposed a variant on the Nova classification consisting of: [32]

  1. Unprocessed, minimally, or moderately processed foods
  2. Processed foods
  3. Ultra-processed foods

Economics

Ultra-processed food as a percentage of household purchases in some European countries, as of 2018 Ultra-processed food as a %25 of household purchases (en).svg
Ultra-processed food as a percentage of household purchases in some European countries, as of 2018

Ultra-processed foods are an important part of the portfolio of the food industry because they rely on low cost ingredients and often enjoy higher profit margins. [33] They often have an extended shelf life, an important consideration for lower income consumers without reliable access to refrigeration. Among other reasons for the popularity of ultra-processed foods are the inexpensive cost of their main ingredients and aggressive marketing, especially toward youth consumers and particularly in middle income countries. [34] [35]

Health effects

The effect of ultra-processed foods on health has mainly been investigated using nutritional epidemiology and so far there has been no randomized controlled trial to investigate the effect of these foods on any health outcome other than weight gain. These studies have shown an overall increased risk for disease, [6] [36] although studies separating different types of ultra-processed food have found adverse affects mainly for only some sub-groups such as soft drinks. [37] Overall, there is an association between certain poor health outcomes including poor cardiometabolic and mental health, and reduced life expectancy and consumption of UPF. [4]

One possible explanation for the adverse effect on health are the high amounts of sugar, fat and salt in these foods, although that does not apply to all ultra-processed foods. Other potential explanations are the presence of contaminants, certain food additives, and the high heat treatment of these foods. [38] There is currently however no scientific consensus. [39]

Environmental impact

Beyond health implications, the production of ultra-processed foods also has significant environmental impacts. [10] These foods require extensive processing and packaging, resulting in higher energy consumption and waste production compared to minimally processed foods. Moreover, the globalized supply chains for the ingredients of ultra-processed foods contribute to greenhouse gas emissions. [40]

Regulation and policy

Given the health and environmental impacts of ultra-processed foods, there have been calls for better regulation and policy surrounding these products. These measures face significant challenges, including industry opposition and the global nature of food supply chains. Future policy efforts may require a combination of regulation, education, and incentives to promote healthier, more sustainable food choices.

Four Latin American countries—Brazil, [41] Uruguay, [42] Peru, [43] and Ecuador [44] —have so far published national official dietary guidelines that recommend avoiding ultra-processed foods. Chile requires warning labels on some ultra-processed foods and taxes sugar-sweetened beverages. [45] A report on obesity published by the World Bank in 2020 mentions ultra-processed foods as a potential contributor. [46]

In 2022, the Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (SACN) reviewed scientific literature to consider whether the British government should adopt a position on ultra-processed food and recommended further research, scheduling a review on its position for June 2024. [39]

Criticism

Following the publication of the Nova classification, some researchers questioned whether food processing should itself be considered a factor in nutrient intake, especially in a prominent 2017 criticism written by researchers, one of which was funded by Nestlé and the Kerry Group. [47] UPFs are imprecisely defined and it is unclear how any adverse effects on health may come about. [48]

In 2022, Carlos Monteiro and Arne Astrup argued for and against the Nova classification in a series of three articles written in the style of an Oxford debate. Montiero argued, for the 'yes' side:

The recommendation to prefer unprocessed/minimally processed foods and freshly made meals instead of ultra-processed foods (following the Nova food classification system) is being increasingly adopted in new official dietary guidelines issued by national governments and international health associations. This recommendation is supported by systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nationally representative dietary surveys and long-term cohort studies. These data show that increased intake of ultra-processed foods is associated with poor-quality diets and with increased morbidity and mortality from several chronic diseases. Various attributes of ultra-processed foods acting through known, plausible, or suggested physiologic and behavioral mechanisms relate them to ill health, and it is likely that different combinations of attributes and mechanisms affect different health outcomes. Although more research should be done to identify these mechanisms, existing evidence is sufficient to recommend the avoidance of ultra-processed foods to optimize health and policies to support and make feasible this recommendation. [49]

Astrup's 'no' argument centres on the Nova definition of ultra-processed foods as not yet sufficiently proven by scientific research for broad application in public health policy:

Clearly, many aspects of food processing can affect health outcomes, but conflating them into the notion of ultra-processing is unnecessary, because the main determinants of chronic disease risk are already captured by existing nutrient profiling systems. In conclusion, the Nova classification adds little to existing nutrient profiling systems; characterizes several healthy, nutrient-dense foods as unhealthy; and is counterproductive to solve the major global food production challenges. [50]

The two researchers nonetheless share consensus that further study is required to understand the effect of food processing on human health:

The participants in this debate agree that food processing vitally affects human health, and that the extent of food processing significantly affects diet quality and health outcomes. They disagree on the significance of ultra-processing, as defined within the Nova food classification system. [51]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lycopene</span> Carotenoid pigment

Lycopene is an organic compound classified as a tetraterpene and a carotene. Lycopene is a bright red carotenoid hydrocarbon found in tomatoes and other red fruits and vegetables.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abdominal obesity</span> Excess fat around the stomach and abdomen

Abdominal obesity, also known as central obesity and truncal obesity, is the human condition of an excessive concentration of visceral fat around the stomach and abdomen to such an extent that it is likely to harm its bearer's health. Abdominal obesity has been strongly linked to cardiovascular disease, Alzheimer's disease, and other metabolic and vascular diseases.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dietary fiber</span> Portion of plant-derived food that cannot be completely digested

Dietary fiber or roughage is the portion of plant-derived food that cannot be completely broken down by human digestive enzymes. Dietary fibers are diverse in chemical composition, and can be grouped generally by their solubility, viscosity, and fermentability, which affect how fibers are processed in the body. Dietary fiber has two main components: soluble fiber and insoluble fiber, which are components of plant-based foods, such as legumes, whole grains and cereals, vegetables, fruits, and nuts or seeds. A diet high in regular fiber consumption is generally associated with supporting health and lowering the risk of several diseases. Dietary fiber consists of non-starch polysaccharides and other plant components such as cellulose, resistant starch, resistant dextrins, inulin, lignins, chitins, pectins, beta-glucans, and oligosaccharides.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diet (nutrition)</span> Sum of food consumed by an organism

In nutrition, diet is the sum of food consumed by a person or other organism. The word diet often implies the use of specific intake of nutrition for health or weight-management reasons. Although humans are omnivores, each culture and each person holds some food preferences or some food taboos. This may be due to personal tastes or ethical reasons. Individual dietary choices may be more or less healthy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plant-based diet</span> Diet consisting mostly or entirely of plant-based foods

A plant-based diet is a diet consisting mostly or entirely of plant-based foods. Plant-based diets encompass a wide range of dietary patterns that contain low amounts of animal products and high amounts of fiber-rich plant products such as vegetables, fruits, whole grains, legumes, nuts and seeds. They do not need to be vegan or vegetarian, but are defined in terms of low frequency of animal food consumption.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maltodextrin</span> Polysaccharide of glucose

Maltodextrin is a name shared by two different families of chemicals. Both families are glucose polymers, but have little chemical or nutritional similarity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthy diet</span> Type of diet

A healthy diet is a diet that maintains or improves overall health. A healthy diet provides the body with essential nutrition: fluid, macronutrients such as protein, micronutrients such as vitamins, and adequate fibre and food energy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Resistant starch</span> Dietary fiber

Resistant starch (RS) is starch, including its degradation products, that escapes from digestion in the small intestine of healthy individuals. Resistant starch occurs naturally in foods, but it can also be added as part of dried raw foods, or used as an additive in manufactured foods.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Refined grains</span> Cereal containing endosperm, but not bran nor germ

Refined grains have been significantly modified from their natural composition, in contrast to whole grains. The modification process generally involves the mechanical removal of bran and germ, either through grinding or selective sifting.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Western pattern diet</span> Modern dietary pattern

The Western pattern diet is a modern dietary pattern that is generally characterized by high intakes of pre-packaged foods, refined grains, red meat, processed meat, high-sugar drinks, candy and sweets, fried foods, industrially produced animal products, butter and other high-fat dairy products, eggs, potatoes, corn, and low intakes of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, pasture-raised animal products, fish, nuts, and seeds.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Antinutrient</span> Compound that affects the absorption of nutrients

Antinutrients are natural or synthetic compounds that interfere with the absorption of nutrients. Nutrition studies focus on antinutrients commonly found in food sources and beverages. Antinutrients may take the form of drugs, chemicals that naturally occur in food sources, proteins, or overconsumption of nutrients themselves. Antinutrients may act by binding to vitamins and minerals, preventing their uptake, or inhibiting enzymes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diet and obesity</span> Effect of diet on obesity


Diet plays an important role in the genesis of obesity. Personal choices, food advertising, social customs and cultural influences, as well as food availability and pricing all play a role in determining what and how much an individual eats.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Weight management</span> Techniques for maintaining body weight

Weight management refers to behaviors, techniques, and physiological processes that contribute to a person's ability to attain and maintain a healthy weight. Most weight management techniques encompass long-term lifestyle strategies that promote healthy eating and daily physical activity. Moreover, weight management involves developing meaningful ways to track weight over time and to identify the ideal body weights for different individuals.

Dietary diversity is the variety or the number of different food groups people eat over the time given. Many researchers might use the word ' dietary diversity' and ‘dietary variety’ interchangeably. However, some researchers differentiate the definition between 2 words that dietary diversity has defined as the difference of food groups while dietary variety has focused on the actual food items people intake.

Nutrition psychology (NP) is the psychological study of the relationship between dietary intake and different aspects of psychological health. It is an applied field that uses an interdisciplinary approach to examine the influence of diet on mental health. Nutrition psychology seeks to understand the relationship between nutritional behavior and mental health/well-being NP is a sub-field of psychology and more specifically of health psychology. It may be applied to numerous different fields including: psychology, dietetics, nutrition, and marketing. NP is a fairly new field with a brief history that has already started to contribute information and knowledge to psychology. There are two main areas of controversy within nutrition psychology. The first area of controversy is that the topic can be viewed in two different ways. It can be viewed as nutrition affecting psychological functions, or psychological choices and behavior influencing nutrition and health. The second controversy is the defining of what is "healthy" or "normal" as related to nutrition.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vegetarian and vegan dog diet</span> Adequate meat-free or animal-free nutrition

As in the human practice of veganism, vegan dog foods are those formulated with the exclusion of ingredients that contain or were processed with any part of an animal, or any animal byproduct. Vegan dog food may incorporate the use of fruits, vegetables, cereals, legumes including soya, nuts, vegetable oils, as well as any other non-animal based foods.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Geoffrey Cannon</span> English journalist and scholar

Geoffrey Cannon is an English author, journalist and former magazine editor, and scholar. From 1968 to 1972, he was the music critic for The Guardian, a role that made him the first dedicated rock critic at a British daily newspaper. Having worked as the arts editor for New Society magazine, he became editor of the BBC publication Radio Times from 1969 to 1979. During that time, he also wrote on music and pop culture for The Listener, the Los Angeles Times, the Chicago Sun-Times, Creem, Rock et Folk, Melody Maker and Time Out.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hyperpalatable food</span> Food that triggers the brains reward system

Hyperpalatable food (HPF) combines high levels of fat, sugar, sodium, or carbohydrates to trigger the brain's reward system, encouraging excessive eating. The concept of hyperpalatability is foundational to ultra-processed foods, which are usually engineered to have enjoyable qualities of sweetness, saltiness, or richness. Hyperpalatable foods can stimulate the release of metabolic, stress, and appetite hormones that play a role in cravings and may interfere with the body's ability to regulate appetite and satiety.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nova classification</span> System of food processing groups

The Nova classification is a framework for grouping edible substances based on the extent and purpose of food processing applied to them. Researchers at the University of São Paulo, Brazil, proposed the system in 2009.

Carlos Augusto Monteiro is a Brazilian nutritionist who is known for coining the term ultra-processed food and introducing the Nova classification.

References

  1. Monteiro C (2010). "The big issue is ultra-processing". World Nutrition. 1 (6): 237–269. ISSN   2041-9775.
  2. Monteiro C (2011). "The big issue is ultra-processing. Why bread, hot dogs – and margarine – are ultra-processed". World Nutrition. 2 (10): 534–549. ISSN   2041-9775.
  3. 1 2 Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Levy RB, Moubarac JC, Louzada ML, Rauber F, Khandpur N, Cediel G, Neri D, Martinez-Steele E, Baraldi LG, Jaime PC (2019). "Ultra-processed foods: what they are and how to identify them". Public Health Nutrition. 22 (5): 936–941. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018003762 . ISSN   1368-9800. PMC   10260459 . PMID   30744710.
  4. 1 2 Lane MM, Gamage E, Du S, Ashtree DN, McGuinness AJ, Gauci S, Baker P, Lawrence M, Rebholz CM, Srour B, Touvier M, Jacka FN, O'Neil A, Segasby T, Marx W (2024-02-28). "Ultra-processed food exposure and adverse health outcomes: Umbrella review of epidemiological meta-analyses". BMJ. 384: e077310. doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-077310. ISSN   1756-1833. PMC   10899807 . PMID   38418082.
  5. Touvier M, Louzada ML, Mozaffarian D, Baker P, Juul F, Srour B (2023-10-09). "Ultra-processed foods and cardiometabolic health: Public health policies to reduce consumption cannot wait". BMJ. 383: e075294. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-075294 . ISSN   1756-1833. PMC   10561017 . PMID   37813465.
  6. 1 2 Pagliai G, Dinu M, Madarena MP, Bonaccio M, Iacoviello L, Sofi F (2021-02-14). "Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health status: a systematic review and meta-analysis". British Journal of Nutrition. 125 (3): 308–318. doi:10.1017/S0007114520002688. ISSN   0007-1145. PMC   7844609 . PMID   32792031.
  7. Filgueiras AR, Pires de Almeida VB, Koch Nogueira PC, Alvares Domene SM, Eduardo da Silva C, Sesso R, Sawaya AL (April 2019). "Exploring the consumption of ultra-processed foods and its association with food addiction in overweight children". Appetite. 135: 137–145. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2018.11.005. PMID   30439381.
  8. Whatnall M, Clarke E, Collins CE, Pursey K, Burrows T (November 2022). "Ultra-processed food intakes associated with 'food addiction' in young adults". Appetite. 178: 106260. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2022.106260. PMID   35921867.
  9. LaFata EM, Gearhardt AN (2022-11-07). "Ultra-Processed Food Addiction: An Epidemic?". Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics. 91 (6): 363–372. doi:10.1159/000527322. ISSN   0033-3190. PMID   36349805.
  10. 1 2 Leite FH, Khandpur N, Andrade GC, Anastasiou K, Baker P, Lawrence M, Monteiro CA (2022-03-01). "Ultra-processed foods should be central to global food systems dialogue and action on biodiversity". BMJ Global Health. 7 (3): e008269. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008269. ISSN   2059-7908. PMC   8895941 . PMID   35346976.
  11. Moubarac JC, Parra DC, Cannon G, Monteiro CA (2014-06-01). "Food classification systems based on food processing: significance and implications for policies and actions. A systematic literature review and assessment". Current Obesity Reports. 3 (2): 256–272. doi:10.1007/s13679-014-0092-0. ISSN   2162-4968. PMID   26626606. S2CID   23606942.
  12. Pollan M (2006). The omnivore's dilemma: A natural history of four meals. New York: Penguin Press. ISBN   978-1-59420-082-3.
  13. 1 2 Monteiro CA (2009-05-01). "Nutrition and health. The issue is not food, nor nutrients, so much as processing". Public Health Nutrition. 12 (5): 729–731. doi: 10.1017/S1368980009005291 . ISSN   1475-2727. PMID   19366466. S2CID   42136316.
  14. 1 2 Gibney MJ (2019-02-01). "Ultra-processed foods: Definitions and policy issues". Current Developments in Nutrition. 3 (2): nzy077. doi:10.1093/cdn/nzy077. PMC   6389637 . PMID   30820487.
  15. Fardet A, Rock E (2019-11-01). "Ultra-processed foods: A new holistic paradigm?". Trends in Food Science & Technology. 93: 174–184. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2019.09.016. ISSN   0924-2244. S2CID   203896042.
  16. Sadler CR, Grassby T, Hart K, Raats M, Sokolović M, Timotijevic L (2021-06-01). "Processed food classification: Conceptualisation and challenges". Trends in Food Science & Technology. 112: 149–162. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.059 . ISSN   0924-2244. S2CID   233647428.
  17. Hässig A, Hartmann C, Sanchez-Siles L, Siegrist M (2023-08-01). "Perceived degree of food processing as a cue for perceived healthiness: The NOVA system mirrors consumers' perceptions". Food Quality and Preference. 110: 104944. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104944 . hdl: 20.500.11850/625580 . ISSN   0950-3293. S2CID   259941132.
  18. Ares G, Vidal L, Allegue G, Giménez A, Bandeira E, Moratorio X, Molina V, Curutchet MR (2016-10-01). "Consumers' conceptualization of ultra-processed foods". Appetite. 105: 611–617. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2016.06.028. ISSN   0195-6663. PMID   27349706. S2CID   3554621.
  19. Darmon N (2009-10-01). "The good, the bad, and the ultra-processed". Public Health Nutrition. 12 (10): 1967–1968. doi: 10.1017/S1368980009991212 . ISSN   1475-2727. PMID   19732488. S2CID   233340283.
  20. Visioli F, Marangoni F, Fogliano V, Rio DD, Martinez JA, Kuhnle G, Buttriss J, Ribeiro HD, Bier D, Poli A (2022-06-22). "The ultra-processed foods hypothesis: a product processed well beyond the basic ingredients in the package". Nutrition Research Reviews. 36 (2): 340–350. doi: 10.1017/S0954422422000117 . hdl: 11577/3451280 . ISSN   0954-4224. PMID   35730561. S2CID   249923737.
  21. Fazzino TL, Rohde K, Sullivan DK (2019-11-01). "Hyper-palatable foods: Development of a quantitative definition and application to the US Food System Database". Obesity. 27 (11): 1761–1768. doi:10.1002/oby.22639. hdl: 1808/29721 . ISSN   1930-7381. PMID   31689013. S2CID   207899275.
  22. Monteiro CA, Levy RB, Claro RM, de Castro IR, Cannon G (2010). "A new classification of foods based on the extent and purpose of their processing". Cadernos de Saúde Pública. 26 (11): 2039–2049. doi: 10.1590/S0102-311X2010001100005 . ISSN   0102-311X. PMID   21180977.
  23. Martinez-Steele E, Khandpur N, Batis C, Bes-Rastrollo M, Bonaccio M, Cediel G, Huybrechts I, Juul F, Levy RB, da Costa Louzada ML, Machado PP, Moubarac JC, Nansel T, Rauber F, Srour B (2023-06-01). "Best practices for applying the Nova food classification system". Nature Food. 4 (6): 445–448. doi:10.1038/s43016-023-00779-w. ISSN   2662-1355. PMID   37264165. S2CID   259024679.
  24. Lockyer S, Spiro A, Berry S, He J, Loth S, Martinez-Inchausti A, Mellor D, Raats M, Sokolović M, Vijaykumar S, Stanner S (2023). "How do we differentiate not demonise – Is there a role for healthier processed foods in an age of food insecurity? Proceedings of a roundtable event". Nutrition Bulletin. 48 (2): 278–295. doi:10.1111/nbu.12617. ISSN   1471-9827. PMID   37164357. S2CID   258618401.
  25. Chajès V, Biessy C, Byrnes G, Deharveng G, Saadatian-Elahi M, Jenab M, Peeters PH, Ocké M, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Johansson I, Hallmans G, Manjer J, Wirfält E, Jakszyn P, González CA (2011-11-01). "Ecological-level associations between highly processed food intakes and plasma phospholipid elaidic acid concentrations: Results from a cross-sectional study within the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)". Nutrition and Cancer. 63 (8): 1235–1250. doi:10.1080/01635581.2011.617530. ISSN   0163-5581. PMID   22043987. S2CID   23413731.
  26. Slimani N, Deharveng G, Southgate DA, Biessy C, Chajès V, van Bakel MM, Boutron-Ruault MC, McTaggart A, Grioni S, Verkaik-Kloosterman J, Huybrechts I, Amiano P, Jenab M, Vignat J, Bouckaert K (2009-11-01). "Contribution of highly industrially processed foods to the nutrient intakes and patterns of middle-aged populations in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study". European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 63 (S4): S206–S225. doi:10.1038/ejcn.2009.82. ISSN   0954-3007. PMID   19888275.
  27. Fardet A (2018). "Characterization of the degree of food processing in relation with its health potential and effects". Advances in Food and Nutrition Research. Vol. 85. Elsevier. pp. 79–129. doi:10.1016/bs.afnr.2018.02.002. ISBN   978-0-12-815089-4. ISSN   1043-4526. PMID   29860978.
  28. Davidou S, Christodoulou A, Fardet A, Frank K (2020-03-26). "The holistico-reductionist Siga classification according to the degree of food processing: an evaluation of ultra-processed foods in French supermarkets". Food & Function. 11 (3): 2026–2039. doi:10.1039/C9FO02271F. ISSN   2042-650X. PMID   32083627. S2CID   211231016.
  29. Fardet A (2018-10-01). "Vers une classification des aliments selon leur degré de transformation: Approches holistique et/ou réductionniste". Pratiques en Nutrition (in French). 14 (56): 32–36. doi:10.1016/j.pranut.2018.09.008. S2CID   187435561.
  30. Eicher-Miller HA, Fulgoni VL, Keast DR (2015-06-01). "Energy and nutrient intakes from processed foods differ by sex, income status, and race/ethnicity of US adults". Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 115 (6): 907–918.e6. doi:10.1016/j.jand.2014.11.004. ISSN   2212-2672. PMID   25578928.
  31. Eicher-Miller HA, Fulgoni VL, Keast DR (2012-11-01). "Contributions of processed foods to dietary intake in the US from 2003–2008: A report of the Food and Nutrition Science Solutions Joint Task Force of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, American Society for Nutrition, Institute of Food Technologists, and International Food Information Council". The Journal of Nutrition. 142 (11): 2065S–2072S. doi:10.3945/jn.112.164442. ISSN   0022-3166. PMC   3593301 . PMID   22990468.
  32. Louzada ML, Baraldi LG, Steele EM, Martins AP, Canella DS, Moubarac JC, Levy RB, Cannon G, Afshin A, Imamura F, Mozaffarian D, Monteiro CA (2015-12-01). "Consumption of ultra-processed foods and obesity in Brazilian adolescents and adults". Preventive Medicine. 81: 9–15. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.07.018. ISSN   0091-7435. PMID   26231112.
  33. Scott C (2018). "Sustainably sourced junk food? Big food and the challenge of sustainable diets". Global Environmental Politics. 18 (2): 93–113. doi: 10.1162/glep_a_00458 . ISSN   1526-3800. S2CID   57559050.
  34. Monteiro CA, Moubarac JC, Cannon G, Ng SW, Popkin B (2013). "Ultra-processed products are becoming dominant in the global food system". Obesity Reviews. 14 (S2): 21–28. doi: 10.1111/obr.12107 . ISSN   1467-7881. PMID   24102801. S2CID   13735684.
  35. Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Moubarac JC, Levy RB, Louzada ML, Jaime PC (2018). "The UN Decade of Nutrition, the NOVA food classification and the trouble with ultra-processing". Public Health Nutrition. 21 (1): 5–17. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017000234 . ISSN   1368-9800. PMC   10261019 . PMID   28322183.
  36. Isaksen IM, Dankel SN (2023-06-01). "Ultra-processed food consumption and cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis". Clinical Nutrition. 42 (6): 919–928. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2023.03.018. ISSN   0261-5614. PMID   37087831. S2CID   257872002.
  37. Chen Z, Khandpur N, Desjardins C, Wang L, Monteiro CA, Rossato SL, Fung TT, Manson JE, Willett WC, Rimm EB, Hu FB, Sun Q, Drouin-Chartier JP (2023-07-01). "Ultra-processed food consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: Three large prospective U.S. cohort studies". Diabetes Care. 46 (7): 1335–1344. doi:10.2337/dc22-1993. ISSN   0149-5992. PMC  10300524. PMID   36854188.
  38. Kliemann N, Al Nahas A, Vamos EP, Touvier M, Kesse-Guyot E, Gunter MJ, Millett C, Huybrechts I (2022-07-01). "Ultra-processed foods and cancer risk: from global food systems to individual exposures and mechanisms". British Journal of Cancer. 127 (1): 14–20. doi:10.1038/s41416-022-01749-y. hdl:10362/153976. ISSN   0007-0920. PMC   9276654 . PMID   35236935.
  39. 1 2 Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (2023-07-11). "SACN statement on processed foods and health". GOV.UK.
  40. Seferidi P, Scrinis G, Huybrechts I, Woods J, Vineis P, Millett C (2020-10-01). "The neglected environmental impacts of ultra-processed foods". The Lancet Planetary Health. 4 (10): e437–e438. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30177-7 . hdl: 11343/252595 . ISSN   2542-5196. PMID   33038314. S2CID   222280757.
  41. Dietary Guidelines for the Brazilian Population (Report). Brasília: Brazilian Ministry of Health. 2014.
  42. "Guías Alimentarias para la Población Uruguaya". Montevideo: Ministerio de Salud del Uruguay. 2016.
  43. Guías Alimentarias para la Población Peruana (Report). Lima: Ministerio de Salud del Perú. 2018.
  44. Documento Técnico de las Guías Alimentarias Basadas en Alimentos (GABA) del Ecuador. GABA-ECU (Report). Quito: Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecuador y Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura. 2018.
  45. Colchero MA, Paraje G, Popkin BM (2021-12-02). Vadiveloo MK (ed.). "The impacts on food purchases and tax revenues of a tax based on Chile's nutrient profiling model". PLOS ONE. 16 (12): e0260693. Bibcode:2021PLoSO..1660693C. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260693 . ISSN   1932-6203. PMC   8638973 . PMID   34855853.
  46. Shekar M, Popkin B, eds. (2020-02-13). Obesity: Health and economic consequences of an impending global challenge. The World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1491-4. hdl:10986/32383. ISBN   978-1-4648-1491-4. S2CID   219141840.
  47. Gibney MJ, Forde CG, Mullally D, Gibney ER (2017-03-01). "Ultra-processed foods in human health: a critical appraisal". The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 106 (3): 717–724. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.117.160440 . ISSN   0002-9165. PMID   28793996.
  48. Tobias DK, Hall KD (2021). "Eliminate or reformulate ultra-processed foods? Biological mechanisms matter". Cell Metabolism. 33 (12): 2314–2315. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.10.005 . PMID   34699743. S2CID   239986991.
  49. Monteiro CA, Astrup A (2022-12-01). "Does the concept of "ultra-processed foods" help inform dietary guidelines, beyond conventional classification systems? YES". The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 116 (6): 1476–1481. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqac122 . PMID   35670127.
  50. Astrup A, Monteiro CA (2022-12-01). "Does the concept of "ultra-processed foods" help inform dietary guidelines, beyond conventional classification systems? NO". The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 116 (6): 1482–1488. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqac123 . ISSN   0002-9165. PMID   35670128.
  51. Astrup A, Monteiro CA (2022-12-01). "Does the concept of "ultra-processed foods" help inform dietary guidelines, beyond conventional classification systems? Debate consensus". The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 116 (6): 1489–1491. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqac230 . ISSN   0002-9165. PMID   36253965.