Broadcasting Services Act 1992

Last updated

Broadcasting Services Act 1992
Coat of Arms of Australia.svg
Parliament of Australia
Citation No. 110, 1992 as amended or No. 110 of 1992
Territorial extent States and territories of Australia
Royal assent 14 July 1992 [1]
Status: Amended

The Broadcasting Services Act 1992(Cth) is an Act of the Parliament of Australia, which broadly covers issues relating to content regulation and media ownership in Australia. [2] [3] The law stipulates what is political advertising and the specific conditions which must be met before they are authorised for publication. [4]

Contents

Background

Prior to the Act, the primary legislation in regulating Australia’s broadcasting services was the Broadcasting Act 1942. The ancestral Act was restrictive to the content and ownership of commercial radio and thus was successively amended to accommodate for the introduction of privately owned television networks. The ad hoc approach to legislating broadcasting regulations was reviewed by parliament in 1988 leading to the drafting of the current Act. [5]

Meanwhile, Australia’s restrictions on foreign investment were eased during the 1980’s leading to significant investment in Australia’s private sector. Restrictions were, however, still in place for Australian radio and television broadcasters. Australian television networks of Nine Network and Seven Network sought foreign equity in early 1990 but had been limited by restrictions on foreign ownership within the ancestral Act. [6]

The Act

The legislation aims to regulate the availability and content of Australian broadcasting services including television, radio, and online platforms. The key objectives of the legislation include:

Broadcasting services are defined as any ‘service that delivers television programs or radio programs’ to consumers. This excludes services that involve ‘no more than data, or no more than text’ as well as ‘point-to-point’ services such as dial-up internet. [3]

The Authority

The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), formerly the Australian Broadcasting Authority, was established by the Act. It was given the express purpose to regulate broadcasting licenses for commercial television and radio, and "...[enable] public interest considerations...", whilst "...not [imposing] unnecessary financial and administrative burdens on providers of broadcasting services”. [3]

ACMA is provided with the role of ensuring all industry codes of practice for broadcasting regulation comply with the objectives of the Act, and if industry self-regulation fails to provide adequate protections, the authority then intervenes to develop new codes of practice. [7]

Content quotas

The Act stipulates a local content quota for regional broadcasters regulated by the ACMA. The system allocates points based on the number of minutes of content broadcast which relates directly to a local area or area in which a broadcasting license is held. ‘Material of local significance’ includes content on individuals, places, organisations, events, and issues pertaining to respective communities. [8]

Point System Allocation [9]
ItemMaterialPoints for each minute of material
1News that:

(a) is broadcast during an eligible period by a licensee covered by subsection 61CW(1) or 61CX(1); and

(b) has not previously been broadcast to the local area during an eligible period; and

(c) depicts people, places or things in the local area; and

(d) meets such other requirements (if any) as are set out in the local programming determination.

3
2News that:

(a) is broadcast during an eligible period; and

(b) has not previously been broadcast to the local area during an eligible period; and

(c) relates directly to the local area; and

(d) is not covered by item 1.

2
3Other material that:

(a) is broadcast during an eligible period; and

(b) except in the case of a community service announcement—has not previously been broadcast to the local area during an eligible period; and

(c) relates directly to the local area.

1
4News that:

(a) is broadcast during an eligible period; and

(b) has not previously been broadcast to the local area during an eligible period; and

(c) relates directly to the licensee’s licence area.

1
5Other material that:

(a) is broadcast during an eligible period; and

(b) except in the case of a community service announcement—has not previously been broadcast to the local area during an eligible period; and

(c) relates directly to the licensee’s licence area.

1

Regional broadcasters must receive either:

Regional broadcasting license areas include:

Media Ownership

The act provides the regulation of broadcasting licenses involving the restriction of company ownership. A person who has at least 15% company ownership through interests, stocks or partnerships is considered in "control" of the company. [10] The monitoring of media ownership is delegated to the ACMA which involves a case-by-case oversight to determine the individuals who are in control of respective broadcasting companies.

Cross-Media Ownership

In 2007, the restrictions on cross-media ownership were relaxed with The Broadcasting Services Amendment (Media Ownership) Act 2007 (Cth) in which the situation of an 'unacceptable media diversity situation' was introduced. [11]

Foreign Ownership

The act defines a 'foreign owner' as an individual with at least 2.5% in company interests. The ACMA is responsible for the register of foreign owners of media assets which includes 'information about foreign stakeholders and their interests in media assets'. This includes any broadcasting licenses held in Television or radio as well as any newspapers within licensed areas. [12]

The ACMA's register for foreign stakeholders currently has 76 registered foreign stakeholders. [12]

The '2 out of 3' rule

One of the central protections from the concentration of broadcasting companies is described as the '2 out of 3' rule which is defined in the act:

'A person cannot control more than two of the regulated media platforms (commercial television, commercial radio and associated newspapers) in any commercial radio licence area.’ [13]

In 2017, the rule was repealed from the act by the Turnbull government. The government argued that the media landscape 'in the face of digitisation' required Australian media to be able to grow unrestricted in order to maintain competitiveness against a growing demand for internet services to be integrated into traditional media platforms. [14]

The repeal led to the takeover of Fairfax Media by Nine Entertainment; two of Australia's largest broadcasting companies in television, radio and print media. [15] [13] The resulting merger of the companies was scrutinised for its damage to media diversity and independent investigative journalism in Australia. [16]

75% coverage rule

The 75% was also abolished with the Broadcasting Legislation Amendment (Broadcasting Reform) Bill 2017. The rule had dictated that broadcasting companies cannot have more than a '75% audience reach' within a license area. [14]

The 5/4 rule

The Broadcasting Services Amendment (Media Ownership) Act 2007 (Media Ownership Bill) proposed a 5/4 voices rule:

'a minimum of five separate traditional media 'voices' in metropolitan radio license areas and four in regional radio license areas'. [17]

The rule remains in place following the 2017 broadcasting reform.

The bill also introduced the theoretical situation where the level of media diversity becomes 'unacceptable'. The ACMA would be required to enforce the new regulations and step in where necessary. [17]

One to a market/Two to a market rule

This rule pertains to any license area and restricts any individual from having control over more than:

  • one television license or;
  • two radio licenses [18]

The rule is described in the act as a 'statutory control rule'. [11] The rule remains in place following the 2017 broadcasting reform.

Amendments

In 1998, the Act was amended to provide accessibility for digital broadcasters to transmission infrastructure. [3] On 1 January 2000, Schedule 5 of the Act was implemented, with the amendment introducing the regulation of online services. This involves the regulation of Internet service providers and a mechanism in which content can be reported for breaching established codes of practice. [19] Schedule 6 was implemented in 2003 and provides regulation of datacasting services. The amendment introduces datacasting licences and restrictions overseen by the ACMA. [19] Schedule 7 was implemented in 2007 and aims to regulate online content. The amendment introduces a new role for the classification board to assist in classifying age restrictions for online content. [19] Schedule 8 was passed through the Communications Legislation Amendment (Online Content Services and Other Measures) Bill 2017. The amendment provides the ACMA with the ability to restrict online promotional gambling content. [20] In 2015, the e-safety commissioner was introduced through the Enhancing Online Safety Act 2015 (Cth). This legislation operates parallel to the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 with the commissioner’s role involving establishing internet industry codes of practice. [21]

Legacy

In 2004, a report into the operation of schedule 5 (the regulation of online broadcasting services) observed several recommendations to be considered by parliament. These include:

Carolyn Lingerwood, a former government advisor regarding the Broadcasting Services Act 1992, in 2002 shared recommendations for the broadcasting regulation in Australia to be restructured. This involved the deregulation of the sector to lower the barriers to entry for emerging services as well as provide a clear set of principles on which to base regulatory measures for future broadcasting services. [22]

In 1999 the Australian Productivity Commission held an inquiry into broadcasting in which amendments to the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 were recommended. These related to the issue of ‘freedom of expression’ specifically regarding political communication. The Commission recommended that the key objectives of the act be modified to include ‘the promotion of freedom of expression'. [23] The review additionally supported the "removal of regulatory barriers" to broadcasting including advocating for foreign ownership to be introduced with the same restrictions as domestic ownership. The review warned of a "concentrated" traditional media within Australia, pointing out News Limited in newspaper, Nine Network in Television and Village Roadshow in radio as companies holding majority of their fields potential audience. [24]

Public Interest Test

The current cross-media ownership regulations have been criticised for not being able to adopt to the evolving capabilities of broadcasting technologies. The solution has been raised in the form of a public interest test. This involves the involvement of third-party individuals and organisations assessing factors of media diversity. [25] A public interest test would 'assess proposed changes in the control of content' and restrictions on broadcasting enterprises. [25] The concept of a public interest test was dismissed by the Howard government for its subjectivity in individuals or organisations concluding what can be considered of public interest. [26]

Royal Commission

In November 2020, Former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd introduced an e-petition to the House of Representatives calling for a Royal Commission into Australian media diversity. The petition directly targets News Corporation and Rupert Murdoch for 'blending editorial opinion with news reporting' to 'attack opponents in business and politics'. The merger of Nine Entertainment and Fairfax Media was also a central aspect for its 'undermining' of 'regional and local news'. [27] The petition, registered as EN1938, received 501,876 online signatures; the most signatures a House of Representatives petition has ever received.

The call for a Royal Commission was supported by the Senate committee following a parliamentary inquiry into media diversity in 2021. [28]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission</span> Canadian broadcasting and telecommunications regulator

The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission is a public organization in Canada with mandate as a regulatory agency for broadcasting and telecommunications. It was created in 1976 when it took over responsibility for regulating telecommunication carriers. Prior to 1976, it was known as the Canadian Radio and Television Commission, which was established in 1968 by the Parliament of Canada to replace the Board of Broadcast Governors. Its headquarters is located in the Central Building of Les Terrasses de la Chaudière in Gatineau, Quebec.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal Communications Commission</span> Independent U.S. government agency

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is an independent agency of the United States government that regulates communications by radio, television, wire, satellite, and cable across the United States. The FCC maintains jurisdiction over the areas of broadband access, fair competition, radio frequency use, media responsibility, public safety, and homeland security.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Communications Act of 1934</span> 1934 U.S. federal law creating the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)

The Communications Act of 1934 is a United States federal law signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on June 19, 1934, and codified as Chapter 5 of Title 47 of the United States Code, 47 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. The act replaced the Federal Radio Commission with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). It also transferred regulation of interstate telephone services from the Interstate Commerce Commission to the FCC.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Telecommunications Act of 1996</span> 1996 U.S. legislation overhauling telecommunications regulations and laws

The Telecommunications Act of 1996 is a United States federal law enacted by the 104th United States Congress on January 3, 1996, and signed into law on February 8, 1996, by President Bill Clinton. It primarily amended Chapter 5 of Title 47 of the United States Code.

Concentration of media ownership is a process whereby progressively fewer individuals or organizations control increasing shares of the mass media. Contemporary research demonstrates increasing levels of consolidation, with many media industries already highly concentrated and dominated by a very small number of firms.

Although Australia is considered to have, in general, both freedom of speech and a free and independent media, certain subject-matter is subject to various forms of government censorship. These include matters of national security, judicial non-publication or suppression orders, defamation law, the federal Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth), film and literature classification, and advertising restrictions.

The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) is an Australian government statutory authority within the Communications portfolio. ACMA was formed on 1 July 2005 with the merger of the Australian Broadcasting Authority and the Australian Communications Authority.

Internet censorship in Australia is enforced by both the country's criminal law as well as voluntarily enacted by internet service providers. The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) has the power to enforce content restrictions on Internet content hosted within Australia, and maintain a blocklist of overseas websites which is then provided for use in filtering software. The restrictions focus primarily on child pornography, sexual violence, and other illegal activities, compiled as a result of a consumer complaints process.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mass media in Australia</span> Overview of mass media in Australia

Mass media in Australia spans traditional and digital formats, and caters mostly to its predominantly English-speaking population. It is delivered in a variety of formats including radio, television, paper, internet and IPTV. Varieties include local, regional, state, federal and international sources of media, reporting on Australian news, opinion, policy, issues and culture.

The Radio Act of 1912, formally known as "An Act to Regulate Radio Communication", is a United States federal law which was the first legislation to require licenses for radio stations. It was enacted before the introduction of broadcasting to the general public, and was eventually found to contain insufficient authority to effectively control this new service, so the Act was replaced and the government's regulatory powers increased by the passage of the Radio Act of 1927.

A broadcast license is a type of spectrum license granting the licensee permission to use a portion of the radio frequency spectrum in a given geographical area for broadcasting purposes. The licenses generally include restrictions, which vary from band to band.

Section 51(v) of the Constitution of Australia is a subsection of Section 51 of the Constitution of Australia that gives the Australian Parliament power to legislate on "postal, telegraphic, telephonic, and other like services".

<i>Broadcasting Act</i> (Canada)

The Broadcasting Act, given royal assent on 1 February 1991, is an act of the Parliament of Canada regarding broadcasting of telecommunications in the country.

The mass media in Bulgaria refers to mass media outlets based in Bulgaria. Television, magazines, and newspapers are all operated by both state-owned and for-profit corporations which depend on advertising, subscription, and other sales-related revenues. The Constitution of Bulgaria guarantees freedom of speech. As a country in transition, Bulgaria's media system is under transformation.

Media ownership in Canada is governed by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), with respect to audiovisual media and telecom networks, and other agencies with more specific jurisdiction, in the case of non-broadcast media—like the Competition Bureau, with respect to competition matters, and Department of Canadian Heritage regarding foreign investment in the cultural sector. The CRTC implements the policies of the Broadcasting Act and the Telecommunications Act within Canada but, because its jurisdiction is limited to these, does not regulate the ownership of newspapers or of non-audiovisual Internet activity. However, it has taken press and non-audiovisual Internet activity taken into consideration in deciding on broadcasting matters. Thus far, the CRTC has undertaken very little regulation of Internet-based audiovisual programming.

Media cross-ownership is the common ownership of multiple media sources by a single person or corporate entity. Media sources include radio, broadcast television, specialty and pay television, cable, satellite, Internet Protocol television (IPTV), newspapers, magazines and periodicals, music, film, book publishing, video games, search engines, social media, internet service providers, and wired and wireless telecommunications.

Mass media regulations are rules enforced by the jurisdiction of law. Guidelines for media use differ across the world. This regulation, via law, rules or procedures, can have various goals, for example intervention to protect a stated "public interest", or encouraging competition and an effective media market, or establishing common technical standards.

Radio regulation in the United States was enforced to eliminate different stations from broadcasting on each other's airwaves. Regulated by the Federal Communications Commission, standardization was encouraged by the chronological and economic advances experienced by the United States of America. Commenced in 1910, before the Communications Act of 1934 was passed, the Federal Radio Commission was the first organization established to control the functioning of radio as a whole through the Commerce Clause. Airwaves run across interstate and international waters, leading to some form of regulation. As years progressed, deregulation was strongly encouraged to provide a little independence from the government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Commercial Radio Australia</span> Industry organization for commercial radio broadcasting in Australia

Commercial Radio Australia (CRA) is the peak body for the commercial radio broadcasting industry in Australia. CRA was formed in 1930 as the Federation of Australian Radio Broadcasters.

<i>Online Streaming Act</i> Canadian federal legislation

The Online Streaming Act, commonly known as Bill C-11, is a bill introduced in the 44th Canadian Parliament. It was first introduced on November 3, 2020, by Minister of Canadian Heritage Steven Guilbeault during the second session of the 43rd Canadian Parliament as An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts, commonly known as Bill C-10, which passed in the House of Commons on June 22, 2021, but failed to pass the Senate before Parliament was dissolved for a federal election. It was reintroduced with amendments as the Online Streaming Act during the first session of the 44th Canadian Parliament in February 2022, passed in the House of Commons on June 21, 2022, and passed in the Senate on February 2, 2023. It received royal assent on April 27, 2023, after the consideration of amendments by the House.

References

  1. ↑ "Broadcasting Services Act 1992". Federal Register of Legislation. Office of Parliamentary Counsel (Australia) . Retrieved 20 October 2022.
  2. ↑ "Broadcasting content regulation". Australian Government. Department of Communication. Retrieved 29 August 2014.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 "Broadcasting Services Act 1992". Federal Register of Legislation. Office of Parliamentary Counsel (Australia). 24 February 2022. Retrieved 20 October 2022.
  4. ↑ Liz Burke (13 September 2016). "Advertising loophole means plebiscite campaign ads won't need to be factually correct". news.com.au. News Limited. Retrieved 13 September 2016.
  5. ↑ Commonwealth of Australia, 1988, Parliamentary debates: House of Representatives: official Hansard, Tuesday, 12 April 1421.
  6. ↑ Jones, R, 1991. Foreign ownership limits on Australia's electronic media, Communications Law Bulletin, 11(1), 26-27. Available at: <http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/CommsLawB/1991/16.html>
  7. 1 2 Australian Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, 2002. ‘Internet Regulation in Australia’, Australian Government, Canberra. <https://humanrights.gov.au/our-work/publications/internet-regulation-australia#4>
  8. ↑ ACMA, 2021. Local Tv content in regional areas [online] Australian Communications and Media Authority. Available at < https://www.acma.gov.au/local-tv-content-regional-areas>
  9. ↑ Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (Cth), SECT 61CY: Available at http://www8.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/legis/cth/consol_act/bsa1992214/s61cy.html
  10. ↑ Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (Cth), Schedule 1: Control and ownership of company interests: Available at http://www8.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/legis/cth/consol_act/bsa1992214/sch1.html
  11. 1 2 Windholz, Eric (2017). "Regulating for Broadcasting Diversity: Balancing Economic and Social Values in the Public Interest". Monash University Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper. 2017/02: 99–124. SSRN   2894142 – via SSRN.
  12. 1 2 Australian Communications and Media Authority (2021). "Foreign ownership". www.acma.gov.au. Archived from the original on 12 April 2020.
  13. 1 2 Wils, Tyson (2021). "Media and broadcasting in the digital age". Archived from the original on 31 July 2019.
  14. 1 2 Australian Parliament House (2017). "Broadcasting Legislation Amendment (Broadcasting Reform) Bill 2017". Archived from the original on 14 September 2017.
  15. ↑ McDuling, John (7 December 2018). "What does the Nine-Fairfax merger mean?". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 15 January 2022.
  16. ↑ "Nine-Fairfax merger: Why is it such a big deal?". SBS News. 26 July 2018. Archived from the original on 15 July 2021.
  17. 1 2 Parliament of Australia (6 October 2006). "Broadcasting Services Amendment (Media Ownership) Bill 2006". Archived from the original on 2 June 2019.
  18. ↑ "Media ownership reform back in the spotlight". www.allens.com.au. Retrieved 15 January 2022.
  19. 1 2 3 Department of Communications, Information Technology, and the Arts, 2004. Review of the operation of schedule 5 to the Broadcasting Services Act 1992. Australian Government, Canberra. Available at: <https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2018-06/apo-nid179851.pdf>
  20. ↑ Parliament of Australia, 2018. Communications Legislation Amendment (Online Content Services and Other Measures) Bill 2017, Bills Digest No. 99, 2017–18, Australian Government, Canberra. Available at: <https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd1718a/18bd099>
  21. ↑ eSafety Commissioner, 2021. Out legislative functions. [online] eSafetyComissioner. Available at: <https://www.esafety.gov.au/about-us/who-we-are/our-legislative-functions> [Accessed 22 December 2021].
  22. ↑ Lingerwood, C, 2002. Reactive, Not Proactive: Recent Trends in Australian Broadcasting Regulation, A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, 9(1). Available at < https://www.jstor.org/stable/43199188>
  23. ↑ Jones, P, 2005. Freedom of the Press: Under Threat Forum - Freedom of Speech: Contemporary Issues, University of New South Wales Law Journal, 28(3). Available at <https://www.unswlawjournal.unsw.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/28-3-4.pdf>
  24. ↑ Baird, M, 2002. Review of Cross-media ownership: a background briefing, INCITE Journal. Available at: https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/agispt.20020994
  25. 1 2 Niloufer, Selvadurai (2012). "Convergence and media ownership – The merits of repealing the '2 out of 3 rule' and adopting a national public interest test". Telecommunications Journal of Australia. 62: 401–416 – via Swinburne Research Bank.
  26. ↑ Jolly, Rhonda (24 July 2007). "Media ownership deregulation in the United States and Australia: in the public interest?". Research Paper Index, Parliament of Australia– via APH.
  27. ↑ Parliament of Australia (2020). "House of Representatives e-Petitions: Petition EN1938 - Royal Commission to ensure a strong, diverse Australian news media". www.aph.gov.au. Archived from the original on 12 April 2021.
  28. ↑ Yosufzai, Rashida (9 December 2021). "Senate report calls for royal commission-like judicial inquiry into media diversity". SBS News. Archived from the original on 9 December 2021. Retrieved 15 January 2022.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.