California Counts

Last updated
Ca-counts-logo.png

California Counts is an organization and campaign based in Sacramento, California, United States, advocating electoral reform in that state. The organization's focus is securing a statewide initiative in June 2008, specifying that California's 55 electoral votes be divided up not on a statewide basis, but on the basis of the state's individual congressional districts.

Contents

Signature gatherers are working to collect the 434,000 signatures that are necessary in order to get the initiative on the ballot. [1] As of December 1, 2007, organizers have failed to raise $2 million for petition circulators and their target of 700,000 signatures to allow leeway for disqualified signatures. [2] The initiative will not appear on the June 2008 California direct primary election ballot [3] to affect the 2008 presidential elections because of lack of funding and time. [4]

Motivation

According to The Independent newspaper, the campaign, while being presented to California voters as a populist issue, in actuality is being engineered to assist the Republican Party in winning the United States presidency in 2008 by giving the Republican candidate 20 more electoral votes. [5] [6] Nearly all the individuals and organizations listed in the "Endorsements" section of the California Counts official website are affiliated with the Republican Party. [7]

Organizers

The campaign was organized by Charles "Chep" Hurth III, a Republican donor to Rudolph Giuliani, and drafted by Tom Hiltachk, a Republican attorney. The campaign's signature drive was organized by Kevin Eckery, a Republican consultant [6] and Mike Arno of Arno Political Consultants, which has been criticized for its reputation for misleading voters. [8] The campaign manager is Dave Gilliard, [2] a Republican consultant with close ties to Issa.

Funding

The largest donor to the campaign (having donated $175,000) is Paul Singer, a Republican billionaire and one of the largest donors to the presidential campaign of Rudolph Giuliani. [1] A complaint was filed with the Federal Election Commission alleging that financial supporters of presidential candidate Rudolph Giuliani, such as Paul Singer, violated federal regulations by supporting the initiative. [4] Singer has also been criticized for the circuitous route his donation took—through a Missouri attorney and a hitherto-unknown corporation—to evade detection of rule violations. [2] Its chief fundraiser is Anne Dunsmore, who took her post directly after leaving her job as national deputy campaign manager for Giuliani. [6] The California Republican Party has contributed US$80,000 toward the campaign, [6] and U.S. Representative Darrell Issa (also a Republican) contributed just under US$60,000. [1] By early November 2007, California Counts reported having collected US$540,000. [1]

Questionable methods

California Counts and Arno Political Consultants, the Sacramento-based firm working for campaign manager Dave Gilliard, have been accused of deploying deceptive tactics in their attempt to acquire signatures. In one instance, petitioners for "children with cancer" at the University of California, Santa Barbara were recorded on videotape to be gathering signatures for California Counts. [9] [10] In a November 1, 2007 news conference, state Democratic Party chair Art Torres also asserted that a deceptive petition had been circulated during an October 27, 2007 anti-war demonstration under the guise of a call to end all war funding. [11] Art Torres and Kristina Wilfore, former head of the Washington-based Ballot Initiative Strategy Center (BISC), asked California Attorney General Jerry Brown to scrutinize whether Arno violated state law in deceiving voters into signing the petition. [12]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2003 California gubernatorial recall election</span>

The 2003 California gubernatorial recall election was a special election permitted under California state law. It resulted in voters replacing incumbent Democratic Governor Gray Davis with Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger. The recall effort spanned the latter half of 2003. Seven of the nine previous governors, including Davis, had faced unsuccessful recall attempts.

Elections in the United States refers to the rules and procedures regulating the conditions under which a candidate, political party, or ballot measure is entitled to appear on voters' ballots. As the nation's election process is decentralized by Article I, Section 4, of the United States Constitution, ballot access laws are established and enforced by the states. As a result, ballot access processes may vary from one state to another. State access requirements for candidates generally pertain to personal qualities of a candidate, such as: minimum age, residency, citizenship, and being a qualified voter. Additionally, many states require prospective candidates to collect a specified number of qualified voters' signatures on petitions of support and mandate the payment of filing fees before granting access; ballot measures are similarly regulated. Each state also regulates how political parties qualify for automatic ballot access, and how those minor parties that do not can. Fundamental to democracy, topics related to ballot access are the subject of considerable debate in the United States.

A write-in candidate is a candidate whose name does not appear on the ballot but seeks election by asking voters to cast a vote for the candidate by physically writing in the person's name on the ballot. Depending on electoral law it may be possible to win an election by winning a sufficient number of such write-in votes, which count equally as if the person was formally listed on the ballot.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tim Eyman</span> Anti-American anti-tax activist, businessman (born 1965)

Timothy Donald Eyman is an American anti-tax activist and businessman.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">California ballot proposition</span> Statewide referendum item in California

In California, a ballot proposition is a referendum or an initiative measure that is submitted to the electorate for a direct decision or direct vote. If passed, it can alter one or more of the articles of the Constitution of California, one or more of the 29 California Codes, or another law in the California Statutes by clarifying current or adding statute(s) or removing current statute(s).

In the politics of the United States, the process of initiatives and referendums allow citizens of many U.S. states to place new legislation, or to place legislation that has recently been passed by a legislature on a ballot for a popular vote. Initiatives and referendums, along with recall elections and popular primary elections, are signature reforms of the Progressive Era; they are written into several state constitutions, particularly in the West. It is a form of direct democracy.

Term limits legislation – term limits for state and federal office-holders – has been a recurring political issue in the U.S. state of Oregon since 1992. In that year's general election, Oregon voters approved Ballot Measure 3, an initiative that enacted term limits for representatives in both houses of the United States Congress and the Oregon Legislative Assembly, and statewide officeholders. It has been described as the strictest term limits law in the country.

The Presidential Election Reform Act was a proposed initiative in the state of California to alter the way the state's electoral votes for president are distributed among presidential candidates.

Electoral reform in Virginia refers to efforts to change the electoral system in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Virginia has undergone much electoral change since its settling in 1607, many of which were required by federal legislation. However, it remains a relatively conservative state in this respect compared to California and others which have experimented with various alternative systems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California Proposition 4</span>

Proposition 4, or the Abortion Waiting Period and Parental Notification Initiative, also known to its supporters as Sarah's Law, was an initiative state constitutional amendment in the 2008 California general election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California Proposition 3</span> Californian law

Proposition 3 is a law that was enacted by California voters by means of the initiative process. It is a bond issue that authorizes $980 million in bonds, to be repaid from state's General Fund, to fund the construction, expansion, remodeling, renovation, furnishing and equipping of children's hospitals. The annual payment on the debt authorized by the initiative is approximately $64 million a year. Altogether, the measure would cost about $1.9 billion over 30 years out of California's general fund.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California Proposition 5</span> 2008 California ballot proposition

California Proposition 5, or the Nonviolent Offender Rehabilitation Act was an initiated state statute that appeared as a ballot measure on the November 2008 ballot in California. It was disapproved by voters on November 4 of that year.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California Proposition 11</span> Ballot measure in California

Proposition 11 of 2008 was a law enacted by California voters that placed the power to draw electoral boundaries for State Assembly and State Senate districts in a Citizens Redistricting Commission, as opposed to the State Legislature. To do this the Act amended both the Constitution of California and the Government Code. The law was proposed by means of the initiative process and was put to voters as part of the November 4, 2008 state elections. In 2010, voters passed Proposition 20 which extended the Citizen Redistricting Commission's power to draw electoral boundaries to include U.S. House seats as well.

Young Political Majors, LLC was a private consulting firm which registered people to vote as Republicans. It operated in several states including California, Florida, Arizona and Massachusetts. The firm was accused of misleading voters into registering as Republicans.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2010 California Proposition 23</span> Ballot proposition concerned with environmental regulations

Proposition 23 was a California ballot proposition that was on the November 2, 2010 California statewide ballot. It was defeated by California voters during the statewide election by a 23% margin. If passed, it would have suspended AB 32, a law enacted in 2006, legally referred to its long name, the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. Sponsors of the initiative referred to their measure as the California Jobs Initiative while opponents called it the Dirty Energy Prop.

A unified primary is an electoral system for narrowing the field of candidates for a single-winner election, similar to a nonpartisan blanket primary, but using approval voting for the first round, advancing the top-two candidates, allowing voters to confirm majority supported candidate in the general election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mimi Soltysik 2016 presidential campaign</span>

The 2016 presidential campaign of Emidio "Mimi" Soltysik, an activist from Los Angeles, California, began with his announcement of candidacy on October 17, 2015. He was formally nominated by the Socialist Party USA for President at their November 2015 convention in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. His running-mate was Angela Nicole Walker, a bus driver and labor organizer from Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The campaign was on the ballot in two states as well as in the U.S. overseas territory of Guam, which has no electoral votes. It earned 4,061 total votes.

The following is a timeline of major events before, during, and after the 2020 United States presidential election, the 59th quadrennial United States presidential election, from November 2020 to January 2021. For prior events, see Timeline of the 2020 United States presidential election (2017–2019) and Timeline of the 2020 United States presidential election.

In direct response to Pennsylvania Democratic Party v. Boockvar and the 2020 United States presidential election in Pennsylvania, the Donald Trump 2020 presidential campaign launched numerous lawsuits contesting the purview of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and the election processes of Pennsylvania. All of these have either been dismissed or dropped. The last two remaining cases were dismissed without comment by the Supreme Court on February 22, 2021. On April 19, 2021, more than five months after the November 3, 2020 election, the Supreme Court declined to hear the outstanding case brought by former Republican congressional candidate Jim Bognet, dismissing it without comment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2021 California gubernatorial recall election</span>

The 2021 California gubernatorial recall election was a special recall election that began in August 2021 and concluded on September 14, 2021, when California voters chose not to recall incumbent Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, elected for the term January 2019 to January 2023.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 "Race is on to qualify Calif. electoral change," by John Marelius, San Diego Union-Tribune, November 19, 2007
  2. 1 2 3 "Electoral College campaign still needs signatures", Los Angeles Times
  3. Elections and Voter Information Archived 2015-08-28 at archive.today , California Secretary of State
  4. 1 2 "Electoral vote measure fails to make June ballot," by Dan Morain, Los Angeles Times , December 7, 2007.
  5. "Tempers flare over electoral petition: Democrat Chief Seeks Probe," by Steven Harmon, San Jose Mercury News , November 2, 2007
  6. 1 2 3 4 "The plot to rig the 2008 US election," Archived 2007-12-01 at the Wayback Machine by Johann Hari, The Independent , November 29, 2007
  7. ""Endorsements" page, California Counts official website". Archived from the original on 2007-12-14. Retrieved 2007-11-29.
  8. "Is GOP scheming to steal another election?" by Marilyn Bechtel, People's Weekly World Newspaper, November 8, 2007
  9. Dirty tricks to steal CA's vote--CAUGHT ON CAMERA!!
  10. "Courage Campaign". Archived from the original on 2007-12-05. Retrieved 2007-12-02.
  11. Is GOP scheming to steal another election?
  12. "Legal challenge on electoral change". Archived from the original on 2007-11-03. Retrieved 2007-12-03.