Campaign to Electrify Britain's Railway

Last updated

The Campaign to Electrify Britain's Railway (CEBR) is an internet-based campaign group formed in 2018, whose aim is to convince the government to completely electrify the British Railway network. Its slogan is "Down with Dirty Diesel." The campaign promotes a rolling programme of electrification, which it considers essential to improve UK railways and help to decarbonise transport. It collaborates with groups such as the Railway Industry Association, [1] Rail Delivery Group, Birmingham Centre for Railway Research and Education, [2] Campaign for Better Transport, [3] Institute of Electrical Engineers [4] and the Permanent Way Institution. [5] The group has given evidence to the Transport Select Committee. Huw Merriman the committee chair at the time, put in writing he agreed with their view. [6] Merriman was appointed as Minister of State for Rail and HS2 in October 2022. [7] [8] The desire to achieve net zero carbon in transport has increased calls for electrification.

Contents

Origins

The CEBR manifesto states: "The UK has suffered from too many boom and bust infrastructure projects. A steady, planned, rolling programme will reduce costs, speed up journey times, create more seats on more reliable trains and ultimately reduce ticket prices." The group staged a protest on top of Snowdon in 2018. [9] In July 2019, the final report of the rail decarbonisation project was published by the group. [10]

2012 Department for Transport plans for UK rail electrification by 2019 including MML electrification and Electric Spine (yellow/green). UK rail electrification by 2019.pdf
2012 Department for Transport plans for UK rail electrification by 2019 including MML electrification and Electric Spine (yellow/green).
Newly installed overhead electrification into Manchester Victoria station, in October 2015 Manchester Victoria western approach.JPG
Newly installed overhead electrification into Manchester Victoria station, in October 2015

Main organisational goals

Many, but not all, diesel trains use only friction brakes (as do cars and trucks) to slow or stop the train. This wears the discs and pads, introducing particulates into the atmosphere. Electric trains predominantly use the motors in regeneration mode to slow the train, producing almost zero particulates. The technology does not yet exist to stop the train completely. [11] Using this technology would improve the health of the nation but in particular for people who live closer to the railway. In addition, regenerative braking saves energy and is more efficient and thus helps the low-carbon economy. Diesel trains also generate soot and particulates from the engines, often clearly visible in the air. Electrification vastly reduces or even eliminates this problem, thus bringing cleaner and healthier air. [12]

Geopolitics

Electric power can be sourced from a diversified grid and thus reduce the effects of oil and geopolitics. Petroleum and petroleum-based products were used as a weapon after the Yom Kippur War, quadrupling the price of oil after an OPEC embargo. [13] In 2000, the fuel protests in the United Kingdom virtually crippled UK transport and left transport agencies only a day away from bringing the diesel railway to a standstill. [14] [15] [16] The rate of electrification in Britain is often compared to overseas and many acknowledge it is a geopolitical and resource issue as petroleum is a finite resource. [17] In addition, the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine highlighted issues with regards to countries being dependent on hydrocarbons from other countries with embargo risks.

Railway electrification in Great Britain

Railway electrification in Great Britain started in the late 19th century. After World War II and the nationalisation of the railways in 1948 and the 1955 Modernisation Plan, electrification commenced in earnest. [18] After a pause, the West Coast Main Line north of Weaver Junction to just south of Glasgow was electrified between 1970 and 1974. Small amounts of the rail system then followed, with more electrification occurring in the 1980s, including the East Coast Main Line. [19]

From the mid-1990s to late 2000s, electrification of the network stalled. In 2009, Lord Adonis was appointed Secretary of State for Transport. After a gap of more than a decade, electrification was back on the agenda [20] and Adonis announced plans to electrify the Great Western Main Line from London as far as Swansea, as well as infill electrification schemes in the North West of England. [21] In July 2012 the UK coalition government announced new electrification schemes, all at 25 kV AC, and reconfirmed schemes previously announced by Adonis. Devolved rail transport in Scotland has allowed the Scottish government to pursue electrification with multiple schemes in the Central Belt. This has been followed up by a further commitment to a low carbon economy and a modal shift to enable it. [22] The 2009 government document was refreshed in January 2015. [23]

However, electrification has not been without controversy, with cost overruns and late-running schemes, particularly on the Great Western Main Line. This led to cancellations of projects [24] and various appearances of the Secretary of State for Transport called before the Transport Select Committee. [25] Shortly after this, Campaign to Electrify Britain's Railway was launched to try and mitigate the boom and bust cycle.

Future railway electrification in Great Britain

The UK government aims to decarbonize all rail transport by 2040, a measure that has broad parliamentary support. [26] [27] In September 2019, Transport Scotland announced the goal of having Scottish transport net carbon neutral by the year 2035. [28] [29] [30] This would be achieved by a rolling programme of electrification; where that is not feasible, using battery and other emerging technology such as hydrogen.

In an attempt to mitigate and improve the cost situation and thus persuade the government to backtrack on its electrification cancellations, the Railway Industry Association published a report in March 2019 detailing why costs had risen and suggested ways forward. [31] Campaign to Electrify Britain's Railway heavily circulated and advertised this report. The answer to a written question in parliament regarding route miles electrified in the years 1997-2019 made rather stark reading. [32] It has been mainly agreed that electrification costs in the UK are too high though. [33]

Railways in Scotland are a devolved matter but all parties including the Green Party are vigorously campaigning for electrification. [34]

Roger Ford, the technical editor of Modern Railways, often writes about similar themes and coined the phrase “Bionic duckweed". This refers to putting off what needs to be done today because something new in the future may be just around the corner [35] to refer to schemes that are not based on electrification but alternative technologies such as biodiesel and Hydrogen. Other writers have done likewise. [36] [37] [38] Other authors also cite issues with the huge inefficiency of hydrogen as opposed to electrification and the safety of using hydrogen fuel. [39]

In September 2020 the Traction Decarbonisation Network Strategy Interim Business case was published. The principal recommendation was further electrification of 13,000 km (single track kilometres) of UK railways. [40] As of November 2022, the TDNS has been quietly abandoned. [41]

On 23 March 2021, the Transport Select Committee published a report in the 'Trains Fit for the Future" enquiry, which recommended a rolling programme of electrification that allowed for battery and hydrogen. Greater cost scrutiny was also recommended. [42] The report was also highlighted in the mainstream press, featuring how Members of Parliament were calling for a rolling programme of electrification. [43] In March 2021, in the April issue of Modern Railways magazine also reported that work was underway to extend OHL electrification to Market Harborough, but that the SPL Powerlines contractor was working in conjunction with Network Rail to extend wires beyond this to Sheffield and Nottingham. It was reported that the scheme was being divided into eight distinct route sections. [44] On 22 April 2021, along with an open letter [45] to Grant Shapps with fifteen signatures, the Railway Industry Association published their report "Why Rail Electrification". It was produced in conjunction with their RailDecarb21 campaign. [46] [47] [48] [49] These set out the case for a rolling programme of rail electrification. [50] Both main political parties agree. [51]

In July 2021, the UK Government released the document "Decarbonising transport – a better greener Britain" and at the same time released the supporting Rail environmental policy document. These were welcomed by the CEBR. [52] [53] These documents stated that rail electrification had a major role to play in the decarbonising agenda.

On 18 November 2021 the Integrated Rail Plan (IRP) was published. [54] This included full Midland Main Line electrification and upgrades. In addition, full Transpennine North electrification was included. However, in December 2021 plans were leaked showing the treasury had declined to provide funding to electrify and decarbonise the railways. [55] [56] [57] Further outcry came after it was revealed in The Guardian that the majority of civil servants who wrote the plan don't even live in the North or Midlands. [58]

The Railway Industry Association continues to carry out reviews on decarbonisation in an effort to hold both the government and the industry to account. [59] Although not the same as electrification, the organisation and others suggest modal shift away from roads to an electrified railway, will also help the climate. [60]

Government reluctance

Countries including India [61] [62] [63] and China [64] [65] [66] are electrifying and building new lines at a fast pace. Europe is following this trend [67] but the UK ranks 21st as a percentage electrified. [68] Germany ranks eighth. [69] Worldwide the electrification volume market remains high. [70] Geopolitics and the desire to reduce reliance on oil has once again put rail electrification high on the agenda. [71]

There are a number of reasons why progress in the United Kingdom is much slower. One of the reasons were the delays and cost overruns on the 21st-century modernisation of the Great Western Main Line project. [72] [73] In addition, there were problems with the GOBLIN electrification project. [74] [75] [76] Another reason cited is apportioning blame between the various parties. [77] The boom and bust cycle over the years has also increased costs as expertise is lost. [78] [79]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rail transport in Great Britain</span>

The railway system in Great Britain is the oldest railway system in the world. The first locomotive-hauled public railway opened in 1825, which was followed by an era of rapid expansion. Most of the track is managed by Network Rail, which in 2017 had a network of 9,824 miles (15,811 km) of standard-gauge lines, of which 3,339 miles (5,374 km) were electrified. In addition, some cities have separate metro, light rail and tram systems, among them the historic London Underground and the Glasgow Subway. There are also many private railways, some of them narrow-gauge, which are primarily short lines for tourists. The main rail network is connected with that of continental Europe by the Channel Tunnel and High Speed 1, opened in 1994 and 2007 respectively.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Transport in the United Kingdom</span>

Transport in the United Kingdom is facilitated by road, rail, air and water networks. Some aspects of transport are a devolved matter, with each of the countries of the United Kingdom having separate systems under separate governments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Network Rail</span> Rail company in the United Kingdom

Network Rail Limited is the owner and infrastructure manager of most of the railway network in Great Britain. Network Rail is a non-departmental public body of the Department for Transport with no shareholders, which reinvests its income in the railways.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Highland Main Line</span> Railway line in Scotland

The Highland Main Line is a railway line in Scotland. It is 118 mi (190 km) long and runs through the central Scottish Highlands, mainly following the route of the A9, and linking a series of small towns and villages with Perth at one end and Inverness at the other. Today, services between Inverness and Edinburgh, Glasgow and London use the line. At Inverness the line connects with the Far North Line, the Aberdeen-Inverness Line and the Kyle of Lochalsh Line. Since the line is not electrified all trains are diesel-powered.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Railway electrification in Great Britain</span> Electrification of railway lines

Railway electrification in Great Britain began in the late 19th century. A range of voltages has been used, employing both overhead lines and conductor rails. The two most common systems are 25 kV AC using overhead lines, and the 750 V DC third rail system used in Southeast England and on Merseyrail. As of October 2023, 6,065 kilometres (3,769 mi) (38%) of the British rail network was electrified.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of rail transport in Great Britain 1995 to date</span> History of British rail transport since 1995

The period from 1995 covers the history of rail transport in Great Britain following the privatisation of British Rail. During this period, passenger volumes have grown rapidly, safety has improved, and subsidies per journey have fallen. However, there is debate as to whether this is due to privatisation or to better government regulation. During this period, High Speed 1, the West Coast Main Line upgrade and Crossrail were completed and more construction projects are currently under way. The period also saw the demise of privately-owned Railtrack and its replacement with government-owned Network Rail.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Great Western Main Line upgrade</span> Major electrification project by Network Rail

In the 2010s Network Rail modernised the Great Western Main Line, the South Wales Main Line, and other associated lines. The modernisation plans were announced at separate times but their implementation overlapped in the 2010s.

The Edinburgh Glasgow Improvement Programme or EGIP was an initiative funded by Transport Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Government to increase capacity on the main railway line between Edinburgh and Glasgow, with new, longer electric trains running by 2017 and scheduled for full completion in 2019. It was expected to cost £742 million and delivered by Network Rail.

Network Rail Control Periods are the 5-year timespans into which Network Rail, the owner and operator of most of the rail infrastructure in Great Britain, works for financial and other planning purposes. Each Control Period begins on 1 April and ends on 31 March to coincide with the financial year. These periods were inherited from Railtrack, so that the earlier ones are retrospective, and not necessarily of 5 years duration.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electric Spine</span> English rail electrification project

The "Electric Spine" was the name for part of a, now largely cancelled, rolling programme of railway electrification projects in England initially estimated to cost £800 million, but later thought to cost close to £3 billion. The aim was to form 25 kV AC overhead-wire electrified links northward from the Port of Southampton to major cities in northern and central England and dry port container terminals in the Midlands. The government wanted efficient electric-hauled freight trains to compete with road haulage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Northern Powerhouse Rail</span> Proposed railway network in the North of England

Northern Powerhouse Rail (NPR), sometimes referred to unofficially as High Speed 3, is a proposed major rail programme designed to substantially enhance the economic potential of the North of England. The phrase was adopted in 2014 for a project featuring new and significantly upgraded railway lines in the region. The aim is to transform rail services between the major towns and cities, requiring the region's single biggest transport investment since the Industrial Revolution. The original scheme would have seen a new high-speed rail line from Liverpool to Warrington continuing to join the HS2 tunnel which it would share into Manchester Piccadilly station. From there, the line would have continued to Leeds with a stop at Bradford. The line was intended to improve journey times and frequency between major Northern cities as well as creating more capacity for local service on lines that express services would have been moved out from.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Transpennine Route Upgrade</span> Rail investments in northern England, proposed November 2021

The Transpennine Route Upgrade (TRU) is a major investment being made in the railway between York and Manchester via Leeds and Huddersfield in the north of England. It is the 76 miles (122 km) northern route over the Pennines, most of which is also known as the Huddersfield line. As of 2024, the line is heavily used but is slow and lacks capacity. It has Victorian infrastructure, covers difficult terrain including the 3-mile (4.8 km) Standedge Tunnel, and has poor access roads.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Midland Main Line upgrade</span> Ongoing railway upgrade in the United Kingdom

The Midland Main Line (MML), a major railway line in the United Kingdom, has been undergoing various upgrades since 2015. The current programme of upgrades began in 2012, although electrification was proposed a number of times previously. The current programme includes electrification of the railway line between Bedford, Wellingborough, Corby, Leicester, Derby, Nottingham and Sheffield. The routes between Nottingham and Sheffield and the Erewash Valley line were not included at this time, only the line between Derby and Sheffield. The upgrade was part of the HLOS for Control Period 5 published by the UK Government in 2012.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">West Coast Main Line route modernisation</span> UK Railway modernisation

The West Coast Main Line is a key strategic railway line in the United Kingdom. It links the cities of London, Glasgow, Birmingham, Liverpool, Manchester, Preston, Lancaster and Carlisle. Virgin Trains took on the franchise to run train services on the routes in 1997 and as part of the agreement wanted an upgrade to the railway line to allow for faster more frequent trains to grow the business. On December 23 1994 the feasibility study was published. The upgrade started in 1998 and was completed in 2009. It came under parliamentary and media scrutiny because of cost and schedule overruns. Further improvements such as the Norton Bridge rail flyover were completed after these dates. The project is sometimes given the acronym WCRM - West Coast Route Modernisation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">ScotRail</span> Train operating company in the United Kingdom

ScotRail Trains Limited, trading as ScotRail, is a Scottish train operating company that is publicly owned by Scottish Rail Holdings on behalf of the Scottish Government. It has been operating the ScotRail franchise as an operator of last resort since 1 April 2022.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Integrated Rail Plan</span>

The Integrated Rail Plan for the North and Midlands or more simply, the Integrated Rail Plan (IRP), is a United Kingdom government proposal published on 18 November 2021. It aims to deliver "increased capacity, faster journeys or more frequent services on eight out of the top ten busiest rail corridors across the North and Midlands", by developing rail services along with the required infrastructure in these regions of England. It was published by the Department for Transport (DfT) and features forewords by Prime Minister Boris Johnson and Transport Secretary Grant Shapps, but its publication was delayed a number of times, partly because of the COVID-19 pandemic. It contains the significant proviso that "In line with the Government's existing approach to rail enhancements, commitments will be made only to progress individual schemes up to the next stage of development, subject to a review of their readiness." A Technical Annexe was published in January 2022. A correction slip was issued March 2022.

North West England electrification schemes are a series of individual railway lines in North West England that have been, and continue to be electrified and upgraded. It is planned that these schemes will result in a modernised, cleaner, lower carbon and faster railway with improved capacity.

The Felixstowe to Nuneaton railway upgrade in the United Kingdom is a series of upgrades being made to both a key strategic freight route and one that carries passengers on many parts. It is one of only two routes between the busiest container port and the Midlands, the other being via London. The route and the upgrade is sometimes abbreviated to F2N. The railway route includes the Birmingham–Peterborough line for a large part. The line links the Port of Felixstowe in Felixstowe, Suffolk, with the Midlands and crosses the East Coast Main Line, the Midland Main Line and the West Coast Main Line and thus the north and Scotland. From Nuneaton, a number of intermodal terminals may be reached. Much infrastructure in the UK is of Victorian origin and thus needed an upgrade; F2N, being a key route, is no exception.

Railway electrification in Scotland has proceeded in a different fashion than the rest of the UK especially in the 21st century. There is political commitment to a substantial rolling programme of railway electrification from the Scottish government where transport is devolved. Transport Scotland and others have said "In Scotland, decarbonisation is spelt E-L-E-C-T-R-I-F-Y". All parties in Scotland are vigorously campaigning for electrification. In January 2022, there were 2776 kilometres of track in Scotland, and 711 kilometres were electrified representing 25.3%. To meet these needs, the plan is to electrify on average 130 single track kilometres (STK) per year until 2035, although there has been some slippage in this target.

References

  1. "RIA publish new paper outlining rail electrification benefits". Global Railway Review. Retrieved 3 April 2023.
  2. "BCRRE Rail Alliance". Rail Alliance. Archived from the original on 2 April 2019. Retrieved 2 April 2019.
  3. "Campaigns". Campaign for Better Transport. Archived from the original on 23 June 2019. Retrieved 21 June 2019.
  4. "Decarbonisation of Transport through Electrification Summit". IEEE - UK and Ireland Section. Archived from the original on 29 July 2021. Retrieved 3 April 2019.
  5. Lawrance and Hodge. "PWI Lecture Northern Hub and beyond". Archived from the original on 22 September 2018.
  6. "Rail Technology Magazine April / May 2022 Page 48". mag.railtechnologymagazine.com. Retrieved 11 May 2022.
  7. "Ministerial Appointments commencing: 25 October 2022". gov.uk. Retrieved 28 October 2022.
  8. "Minister of State (Rail and HS2)". gov.uk. Retrieved 3 November 2020.
  9. "Electrification protest on Snowdon". Rail Business Daily. 8 May 2018. Archived from the original on 8 May 2019. Retrieved 8 May 2019.
  10. "Decarbonisation – our final report to the Rail Minister". rssb.co.uk. Archived from the original on 22 July 2019. Retrieved 22 July 2019.
  11. "Regenerative braking boosts green credentials - Railway Gazette". 11 March 2014. Archived from the original on 11 March 2014. Retrieved 27 January 2020.
  12. "Freight Study: Full report" (PDF). England's Economic Heartland. June 2019.
  13. "Milestones: 1969–1976 - Office of the Historian". history.state.gov. Archived from the original on 6 March 2014. Retrieved 27 January 2020.
  14. "BBC News | UK | Fuel crisis hits services". BBC. Archived from the original on 27 January 2020. Retrieved 27 January 2020.
  15. Hetherington, Peter; Ward, David (11 September 2000). "Fuel crisis looms as pickets hit depots". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077. Archived from the original on 27 January 2020. Retrieved 27 January 2020.
  16. "BBC NEWS | In Depth | World fuel crisis | UK fuel tax: The facts". BBC. Archived from the original on 27 January 2020. Retrieved 27 January 2020.
  17. Watson, Inara (January 2021). "The advantages of electrified railways: An international summary". Permanent Way Institution Journal. 139 (1): 36–37. ISSN   2057-2425 via PWI.
  18. "Electrification 1955" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 September 2015.
  19. "ECML: Electrification as it used to be | Rail Engineer". Archived from the original on 6 January 2022. Retrieved 6 January 2022.
  20. "Network RUS Electrification" (PDF). Network Rail Archives. October 2009. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 February 2022. Retrieved 2 February 2022.
  21. "July 2009 Electrification UK Government paper" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 May 2010. Retrieved 1 April 2019.
  22. "Scottish investment to support decarbonisation and modal shift". Rail Technology Magazine. Archived from the original on 4 February 2021. Retrieved 5 February 2021.
  23. "Network RUS Electrification 'Refresh'" (PDF). Network Rail. 16 January 2015. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 March 2022. Retrieved 13 March 2022.
  24. "Rail electrification plans scrapped". 20 July 2017. Archived from the original on 1 April 2019. Retrieved 1 April 2019.
  25. "Transport Select Committee Report June 2018" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 April 2019.
  26. "Transport Times Events | News/Blog | Electrifying more of UK's railway will help the Government hit its decarbonisation targets – this work cannot wait". transporttimes.co.uk. Archived from the original on 7 May 2021. Retrieved 7 May 2021.
  27. McArdle, Conor (21 June 2018). "The decarbonisation of transport: The next step". The Opus Energy Blog. Archived from the original on 3 April 2019. Retrieved 3 April 2019.
  28. Keane, Kevin (2 May 2019). "Scotland to set 'faster' climate change target". Archived from the original on 27 August 2019. Retrieved 6 September 2019.
  29. "Protecting Scotland's Future: the Government's Programme for Scotland 2019-2020 - gov.scot". gov.scot. Archived from the original on 6 September 2019. Retrieved 6 September 2019.
  30. "Scotland plans to decarbonise its railways by 2035". Global Railway Review. Archived from the original on 6 September 2019. Retrieved 6 September 2019.
  31. "Electrification Cost Challenge Report". riagb.org.uk. Archived from the original on 27 March 2019. Retrieved 14 March 2019.
  32. "Railways: Electrification:Written question - 219526". UK Parliament. Archived from the original on 2 April 2019. Retrieved 2 April 2019.
  33. "British electrification costs could be cut by 50%, says report". International Railway Journal. 14 March 2019. Retrieved 15 March 2022.
  34. "Rail for All Scottish Green Party" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 January 2021.
  35. Great Britain Parliament House of Commons Transport Committee (24 July 2008). Delivering a Sustainable Railway: A 30-year Strategy for the Railways? : Tenth Report of Session 2007-08 : Report, Together with Formal Minutes, Oral and Written Evidence. The Stationery Office. ISBN   9780215522221. Archived from the original on 29 July 2021. Retrieved 5 April 2019.
  36. "Why Tech is not always the answer - The Perils of Bionic Duckweed". Financial Times. 30 October 2020. Archived from the original on 1 December 2020.
  37. Deshpande, Prasad. "Bionic Duckweed". thelantern.substack.com. Archived from the original on 16 November 2020. Retrieved 1 December 2020.
  38. "Why tech isn't always the answer — the perils of bionic duckweed". The World News Monitor. 30 October 2020. Retrieved 1 December 2020.
  39. "Liebreich: Separating Hype from Hydrogen – Part Two: The Demand Side". BloombergNEF. 16 October 2020. Archived from the original on 26 January 2021. Retrieved 26 January 2021.
  40. "Network Rail TDNS Interim Business Case" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 February 2021. Retrieved 19 November 2020.
  41. Ford, Roger (November 2022). Sherratt (ed.). "TDNS terminated - official". Modern Railways. 79 (890). Key Publishing: 26–31. ISSN   0026-8356.
  42. "Transport Committee: To hit its own decarbonisation deadline, Government must set out clear strategy for rail network - Committees - UK Parliament". Parliament of the United Kingdom. Archived from the original on 23 March 2021. Retrieved 23 March 2021.
  43. Lancefield, Neil (23 March 2021). "MPs call for rolling programme of rail electrification projects to cut carbon". Evening Standard. Archived from the original on 23 March 2021. Retrieved 23 March 2021.
  44. "MML wires towards Market Harborough". Modern Railways. Key Publishing. April 2021. p. 23.
  45. "Railway industry urges Government to begin programme of rail electrification now, in order to meet Net Zero legal commitments". RailBusinessDaily. 22 April 2021. Archived from the original on 22 April 2021. Retrieved 22 April 2021.
  46. "RailDecarb21 - Campaigns". riagb.org.uk. Archived from the original on 22 April 2021. Retrieved 22 April 2021.
  47. "Why Rail Electrification? Report". riagb.org.uk. Archived from the original on 22 April 2021. Retrieved 22 April 2021.
  48. "Government urged to begin immediate rail electrification works". Rail Technology Magazine. Archived from the original on 22 April 2021. Retrieved 22 April 2021.
  49. "UK needs 'immediate' programme of rail electrification to hit net zero goals". New Civil Engineer. 22 April 2021. Archived from the original on 22 April 2021. Retrieved 22 April 2021.
  50. "Electrification programme needed to meet Net Zero legal commitments". Railway Gazette International. 22 April 2021. Archived from the original on 22 April 2021. Retrieved 22 April 2021.
  51. "Electrifying more of UK's railway will help the Government hit its decarbonisation targets – this work cannot wait". transporttimes.co.uk. Archived from the original on 7 May 2021. Retrieved 7 May 2021.
  52. "Decarbonising Transport - a better greener Britain" (PDF). UK Government. July 2021. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 July 2021. Retrieved 15 July 2021.
  53. "Rail environmental policy statement" (PDF). UK Government. July 2021. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 July 2021. Retrieved 15 July 2021.
  54. "Integrated Rail Plan for the North and Midlands" (PDF). UK Government. 18 November 2021. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 November 2021.
  55. "Reports: Treasury shelves £30bn plan to electrify UK railways over cost concerns". www.businessgreen.com. 13 December 2021. Archived from the original on 13 December 2021. Retrieved 13 December 2021.
  56. "RailDecarb21". Twitter. Archived from the original on 13 December 2021. Retrieved 13 December 2021.
  57. "Treasury blocks £30bn plan to electrify Britain's railways". B2BCHIEF: CREATE THE BUZZ. 11 December 2021. Archived from the original on 13 December 2021. Retrieved 13 December 2021.
  58. "Majority of officials who downgraded northern rail plans don't live there". the Guardian. 31 December 2021. Archived from the original on 5 January 2022. Retrieved 6 January 2022.
  59. "Railway Industry Association publishes review on Government decarbonisation". Rail Technology Magazine. Retrieved 30 March 2022.
  60. High Speed Rail Group. "Modal shift matters - and HS2 delivers it" (PDF). rail leaders.
  61. "Welcome to Official Website of CORE". core.indianrailways.gov.in. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  62. "Indian Railways completes electrification on one of the biggest stretches in Konkan region". Financialexpress. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  63. Livemint (31 January 2022). "Indian Railways electrification: Three zones 100% electrified. Details here". mint. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  64. "China Rail Electrification Bureau". Chinese Government English Language. March 2022.
  65. Xu, Xueyi; Kent, Stephen; Schmid, Felix (6 May 2020). "Carbon-reduction potential of electrification on China's railway transport: An analysis of three possible future scenarios". Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit. 235 (2): 226–235. doi:10.1177/0954409720921989. ISSN   0954-4097. S2CID   218943844.
  66. "Electrification of transportation infrastructure in China improves efficiency". GSEP. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  67. "Europe leads the charge to replace diesel traction". International Railway Journal. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  68. "Electrified rail network in Europe, by country". Statista. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  69. "Germany lags behind European neighbours in railway electrification". Clean Energy Wire. 25 October 2021. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  70. "Railway electrification is expected to grow worldwide". Railway PRO. 19 February 2021. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  71. "Railway electrification step towards reducing European oil dependency". RailFreight.com. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  72. "Great Western electrification: Intercity line work 'deferred'". BBC News. 8 November 2016. Retrieved 10 November 2016.
  73. "Rail electrification between Cardiff and Swansea delayed". BBC. 25 November 2015. Retrieved 14 December 2015.
  74. "London Overground Gospel Oak to Barking route to reopen on Monday 27 February but further work is required". Network Rail. 7 February 2017. Retrieved 8 February 2017.
  75. "Beleaguered Barking to Gospel Oak line to reopen". New Civil Engineer. Retrieved 28 May 2018.
  76. "Gospel Oak to Barking electrification works to be complete in time for arrival of new double-length electric trains". Network Rail Media Centre.
  77. "Will the UK ever get electrification back on track?". Railway Technology. 13 June 2018. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  78. "UK electrification is far too slow says industry". RailFreight.com. 18 October 2021. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  79. "Why is Britain's rail network still dependent on high-polluting diesel trains?". New Statesman. 25 November 2021. Retrieved 31 March 2022.

Further reading