Cannon-Caliber Electromagnetic Gun launcher

Last updated

The Cannon-Caliber Electromagnetic Gun (CCEMG) launcher is a rapid-fire railgun launcher developed by the U.S. military in the early 1990s to study and test the viability of electromagnetic weapons. [1]

Contents

Description

The CCEMG launcher (version III) was a series augmented railgun capable of firing three five-round salvos of 185-g launch packages at a velocity of 1,850 m/s with a firing rate of 5 Hz. It was a 2.25 m long, water-glycol cooled launcher with a 30 mm rectangular bore and achieved rapid fire operation with the help of a CCEMG compulsator that provided multiple 835 kA peak pulses. [1] [2] The CCEMG launcher had an overall mass of only 273 kg despite its solid armature and its structurally stiff makeup, which resulted from incorporating a directional preloading mechanism, ceramic sidewalls, and a composite overwrap in its design. The performance of the CCEMG launcher relied on the system's directional preloading mechanism, called “flatjacks,” which were located between the main and augmenting rails of the railgun. The flatjacks countered the electromagnetic loading and applied pressure to the main rails so that the ceramic sidewalls (made of AD-96 alumina) remained in compression throughout the discharge. They were required to be pressurized to 138 MPa for a full current shot and had to endure a displacement of about 1.3 mm. The filament-wound composite overwrap, composed of 82 percent graphite fibers and 18 percent fiberglass, reacted the preload and provided stiffness to the launcher in the axial direction. The rails were made out of chromium copper due to its strength (310 MPa yield), conductivity (82 percent IACS), relatively low cost, and dimensional stability. [1] [3] The main rails were slit transverse to the launcher's axis to the midpoint of the ceramic wall in order to achieve a breech efficiency (kinetic energy of the armature divided by the energy delivered to the breech of the gun) of 50 percent. [1] [4]

Properties

The following tables display the parameters for the CCEMG launcher:

CCEMG launcher physical properties [5]
Railgun typeSeries augmented
Bore dimensions (cm)1.73 x 2.73
Overall length (m)2.25
Augmented length (m)1.85
Stiffness at peak current0.2% deflection
CoolantWater-ethylene glycol
Weight (kg)273
CCEMG launcher performance [5]
Launch package mass (g)180
Muzzle velocity (m/s)1,850
Peak current (kA)835
Number of salvos3
Rounds per salvo5
Firing rate (Hz)5
Time between salvos (s)2.5

Development

The CCEMG launcher was developed in the early 1990s as part of the Cannon-Caliber Electromagnetic Gun (CCEMG) Program to demonstrate the viability of an electromagnetic multi-shot weapon. The CCEMG program was sponsored by the U.S. Army Armament Research, Development, and Engineering Center and the U.S. Marine Corps. As part of the project, the Center for Electromechanics at the University of Texas at Austin (UT-CEM) was commissioned to construct the launcher as well as provide the pulsed power supply and armature development, while the Kaman Science Corporation was tasked with developing the Integrated Launch Package (ILP) for the railgun. [6] In order to design the CCEMG launcher, an optimization algorithm called EXCaliber (short for Electromagnetic eXperimental Caliber) was developed to take into account details surrounding armature and barrel structural and thermal design requirements as well as analyze the impact of different launch environment conditions on power supply size and mass. The equations governing armature and barrel design were coded into a FORTRAN program structure, and the thermal and structural design constraints for both the armature and barrel were interdependently modeled. EXCaliber was used to calculate the minimum armature and barrel bass as well as the minimum required gun breech energy demands. Based on these calculations, the optimization algorithm determined that the minimum breech energy demand occurred at 1.85 km/s launch velocity and that the breech energy demand for one-turn (simple rail) designs increased at a higher rate than two- or three-turn (augmented) designs as launch velocity increased. The results from EXCaliber also concluded that a rectangular bore cross-section provided a higher launch efficiency than a round-bore design. [7]

In designing the CCEMG launcher, UT-CEM and the Kaman Science Corporation were given a specific set of requirements that the launcher had to meet. (See table below)

CCEMG Statement of Work (SOW) Requirements [6]
Armor penetration at 56 degrees obliquity131 mm RHA at 1.5 km; 66 mm RHA at 3 km
Caliber20 to 40 mm
Firing rate300 to 400 rounds per minute
Salvo size5 to 7 rounds
Time between salvos2 to 2.5 seconds
Probability of hit90%
System weight5,000 lb (2,286 kg) maximum
Weapon platformCompatible with Amphibious Assault Vehicle

In order to fulfill these target specifications, several design choices were made to the CCEMG to optimize its performance. The CCEMG armature, which had to carry the accelerating current and distribute the accelerating force to the sub-projectile, was designed to be discarded after launch and made contact with the rail at two distinct places. The launch package was also calculated by EXCaliber to have a total mass of 180 grams, which was evenly split between the armature and the sub-projectile. Other design choices included the incorporation of ceramic sidewalls, internal preloading, and chromium copper rails. For the ILP, the Kaman Science Corporation designed the launch package to operate at a launch velocity of 1,850 m/s to meet the penetration at range requirement, resulting in a peak axial acceleration of 2.06 x 106 m/s2 or 210,000 g's. The pulsed power supply (PPS) for the CCEMG launcher was composed of eight banks, each of which was nominally 200 kJ at a rated maximum charge voltage of 10 kV. [7] As the CCEMG launcher's power supply, the air-core compulsator weighed 2,045 kg and stored 40 MJ at 12,000 rpm. [4] At the conclusion of the CCEMG program's development process, two single-shot railguns (known as CCEMG launchers IIA and IIB) and a water-glycol cooled, rapid-fire railgun (CCEMG launcher III) were built. The only listed difference between launchers IIA and IIB from launcher III was that launcher III possessed coolant passages to cool the rail sets between salvos and a deceleration guide required for autoloading. [5]

Tests

Launcher IIA testing

Preliminary testing of the CCEMG launcher IIA took place at UT-CEM and at the U.S. Army Research Laboratory (ARL) from 1994 to 1995. [1] The primary purpose of the experimental test was to verify the performance of the single-shot launcher and the ILP to determine whether they met the CCEMG system requirements. Improvements and modifications to the launcher and ILP were made during various phases of testing. [6]

Summary of launcher IIA testing [1] [5]
Shot NumberCEM 7CEM 11ARL 7ARL 14ARL 16ARL 34ARL 37ARL 38ARL 39
Date3/1/943/14/948/31/949/28/9410/21/946/1/958/15/958/16/958/17/95
PPS parameters
CPA speed (rpm)37743837NANANANANANANA
Field excitation (A)14891500NANANANANANANA
Peak voltage (V)163816128500840092007400780086009100
CPA volts (V)110220NANANANANANANA
Firing angle (degrees)5.845.00NANANANANANANA
Peak current (kA)552462609586667*639666716766
Pulse width (ms)4.14.11.92.21.9*2.62.32.12.0
Time to peak (ms)1.91.90.380.380.38*0.470.460.460.46
Launcher/ILP parameters
Velocity (m/s)133913501886136914921350149216391785
ILP mass (kg)0.1860.0980.1740.1780.1800.1800.1800.1800.180
Breech efficiency (%)5130374242*3739.139.844.6
Armature insertion force (kN)11.65.982.795.897.575.585.575.575.57
Armature current at exit (kA)12394294263300*132146134384
Action at exit (MA2s)515355367436511468500527642
Flatjack pressure (MPa)1039696939696*110110128
Note: *estimated

CEM-UT testing

The CCEMG launcher IIA fired a total of 11 shots at UT-CEM. The launcher was powered with a 1 MJ/pulse iron core compulsator, and the shots were fired with a gradual increase in system energy. [1] [5] The deviation of the bore centerline was measured before and after flatjack pressurization prior to electrical testing in order to determine whether the flatjacks had an effect on bore straightness, which indicated the integrity of the adhesive bonds between the rails and the sidewall as well as the symmetry of the structural preload. [1] [4] The bore straightness changed very little even after the 11th shot, deviating from a straight line by at most 0.2 mm, suggesting that either a uniform amount of axial strain was being applied to the structure or that the flatjack axial strains had minimal effect on the structure. Launcher IIA demonstrated its highest performance on shot 7, which had a peak current of 552 kA. During the last shot, testers found an insulation flaw within the launcher. As a result, modifications were made to the electrical insulation design of launchers IIB and III, such as the thickening of the mica insulation, the addition of a composite insulating barrier between the flatjack manifold region and the augmenting rails, and the incorporation of an additional fiberglass layer to the bore of the composite overwrap. [1] [5]

ARL testing

The ARL testing of the CCEMG launcher IIA took place at the EM Facility at the Transonic Range in Aberdeen Proving Ground (APG), MD. The launcher was powered by a 1.55 MJ capacitor-based pulsed power supply composed of eight banks, each of which could be charged to different initial voltages and be triggered independently in time. [1] [5] Throughout testing, muzzle velocity was measured using various techniques, such as by recording the time rate of change of the armature's in-bore induction field. Other methods included the use of a smear camera, flash x-ray, and radar. Radar was also used to evaluate the subprojectile velocity degradation that occurred over the flight range. Fifteen yaw cards that served as cardboard targets were used to assess the free-flight aerodynamics of the projectile launched from the railgun. [6] [8] [9]

The launcher fired a total of 39 shots at APG, where shots 1 to 9 focused on component characterization, shots 10 to 16 focused on armature development, shots 17 to 27 focused on launch dynamics, shots 28 to 32 focused on pseudo multishot capabilities, and shots 33 to 39 focused on peak performance. Shots 28 to 32 were fired without bore maintenance between the five consecutive shots to gauge the eventual multishot operation of the CCEMG launcher. [1] During shots 33 to 39, launcher IIA was subjected to maximum stress levels by increasing the initial capacitor charge voltage and the resultant peak current delivered to the launcher. [6] Consequently, shot 39 demonstrated the highest performance with a peak current of 766 kA as well as the highest muzzle current at 384 kA. However, since the launcher was not designed to withstand this level of force at the muzzle, substantial structural deformation and rail wear at the muzzle were observed afterwards. [1] At the conclusion of the test, it was determined that launcher IIA was rendered unusable due to the resulting damage, and the remaining flatjack was pressurized to failure to determine its upper design limit. The flatjack reached a pressure ceiling of 30 ksi without failure, but the pressurization stopped shortly afterwards to prevent damage to the augmenting rails, which was salvaged for reuse. Upon the disassembly of launcher IIA, several cracks in the sidewalls were observed, likely due to stress concentration. However, the rail bonds and the aluminum-coated rail bore surfaces sustained very little damage. [1] [5]

Launcher III testing

The performance test of the CCEMG launcher III was conducted by CEM-UT in 1996. Despite being a multishot system, launcher III underwent only single-shot testing during this evaluation for the purposes of verifying the accuracy of the computer simulation, establishing the reliability of the control system, and determining the necessary parameters for the pulse power system. Multishot testing took place with incremental increases in system energy in subsequent tests. A total of six single shots were fired for this trial, of which the sixth shot demonstrated the highest muzzle energy with 279 kJ. The results showed no damage to the rail or sidewall of the launcher with the exception of minor arc erosion caused by the last shot. [4]

Summary of launcher III testing [4]
Shot number3456
Date1/24/962/5/962/7/962/9/96
Power supply parameters
Field amps (kA)22.027.427.430.5
Field rise time (s)0.1920.1950.1950.160
Peak AC volts (V)1,9102,5102,4852,835
Fire angle (degree)5555
Peak gun current (kA)496599605660
Pulse width (ms)3.302.972.972.97
Launcher/Armature parameters
Primary flatjack pressure (ksi)10.013.013.015.0
ILP mass (g)135.3148.4163.3154.5
Load force (lbf)3,1003,2003,3603,136
ILP muzzle velocity (m/s)1,1871,7291,5301,900
Muzzle energy (kJ)95.3222191279
Muzzle current (kA)0.012568212
Breech efficiency (%)44534949

Follow-up experiments

In 1999, researchers at ARL conducted a series of experiments on the CCEMG launcher at the Transonic Experimental Facility at Aberdeen to investigate the effects of electromagnetism on the sabot discard process and on the subprojectile during launch. [10] [11]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Artillery</span> Long-ranged guns for land warfare

Artillery is a class of heavy military ranged weapons that launch munitions far beyond the range and power of infantry firearms. Early artillery development focused on the ability to breach defensive walls and fortifications during sieges, and led to heavy, fairly immobile siege engines. As technology improved, lighter, more mobile field artillery cannons developed for battlefield use. This development continues today; modern self-propelled artillery vehicles are highly mobile weapons of great versatility generally providing the largest share of an army's total firepower.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mass driver</span> Proposed spacelaunch method

A mass driver or electromagnetic catapult is a proposed method of non-rocket spacelaunch which would use a linear motor to accelerate and catapult payloads up to high speeds. Existing and contemplated mass drivers use coils of wire energized by electricity to make electromagnets, though a rotary mass driver has also been proposed. Sequential firing of a row of electromagnets accelerates the payload along a path. After leaving the path, the payload continues to move due to momentum.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bullet</span> Projectile propelled by a firearm, sling, or air gun

A bullet is a kinetic projectile, a component of firearm ammunition that is shot from a gun barrel. Bullets are made of a variety of materials, such as copper, lead, steel, polymer, rubber and even wax. Bullets are made in various shapes and constructions, including specialized functions such as hunting, target shooting, training and combat. Bullets are often tapered, making them more aerodynamic. Bullet sizes are expressed by their weights and diameters in both imperial and metric measurement systems. For example: 55 grain .223 caliber bullets are of the same weight and caliber as 3.56 gram 5.56mm caliber bullets. Bullets do not normally contain explosives but strike or damage the intended target by transferring kinetic energy upon impact and penetration. Bullets shot by firearms can be used for target practice or hunting.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caliber</span> Internal diameter of the barrel of a gun

In guns, particularly firearms, caliber is the specified nominal internal diameter of the gun barrel bore – regardless of how or where the bore is measured and whether the finished bore matches that specification. It is measured in inches or in millimeters. In the United States it is expressed in hundredths of an inch; in the United Kingdom in thousandths; and elsewhere in millimeters. For example, a "45 caliber" firearm has a barrel diameter of roughly 0.45 inches (11 mm). Barrel diameters can also be expressed using metric dimensions. For example, a "9 mm pistol" has a barrel diameter of about 9 millimeters. Since metric and US customary units do not convert evenly at this scale, metric conversions of caliber measured in decimal inches are typically approximations of the precise specifications in non-metric units, and vice versa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Railgun</span> Electrically powered electromagnetic projectile launcher

A railgun or rail gun is a linear motor device, typically designed as a weapon, that uses electromagnetic force to launch high velocity projectiles. The projectile normally does not contain explosives, instead relying on the projectile's high speed, mass, and kinetic energy to inflict damage. The railgun uses a pair of parallel conductors (rails), along which a sliding armature is accelerated by the electromagnetic effects of a current that flows down one rail, into the armature and then back along the other rail. It is based on principles similar to those of the homopolar motor.

A compensated pulsed alternator, also known by the portmanteau compulsator, is a form of power supply.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Coilgun</span> Artillery using coils to electromagnetically propel a projectile

A coilgun, also known as a Gauss rifle, is a type of mass driver consisting of one or more coils used as electromagnets in the configuration of a linear motor that accelerate a ferromagnetic or conducting projectile to high velocity. In almost all coilgun configurations, the coils and the gun barrel are arranged on a common axis. A coilgun is not a rifle as the barrel is smoothbore. The name "Gauss" is in reference to Carl Friedrich Gauss, who formulated mathematical descriptions of the magnetic effect used by magnetic accelerator cannons.

Muzzle velocity is the speed of a projectile with respect to the muzzle at the moment it leaves the end of a gun's barrel. Firearm muzzle velocities range from approximately 120 m/s (390 ft/s) to 370 m/s (1,200 ft/s) in black powder muskets, to more than 1,200 m/s (3,900 ft/s) in modern rifles with high-velocity cartridges such as the .220 Swift and .204 Ruger, all the way to 1,700 m/s (5,600 ft/s) for tank guns firing kinetic energy penetrator ammunition. To simulate orbital debris impacts on spacecraft, NASA launches projectiles through light-gas guns at speeds up to 8,500 m/s (28,000 ft/s).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gun barrel</span> Firearm component which guides the projectile during acceleration

A gun barrel is a crucial part of gun-type weapons such as small firearms, artillery pieces, and air guns. It is the straight shooting tube, usually made of rigid high-strength metal, through which a contained rapid expansion of high-pressure gas(es) is used to propel a projectile out of the front end (muzzle) at a high velocity. The hollow interior of the barrel is called the bore, and the diameter of the bore is called its caliber, usually measured in inches or millimetres.

A magnetic weapon is one that uses magnetic fields to accelerate or stop projectiles, or to focus charged particle beams. There are many hypothesised magnetic weapons, such as the railgun and coilgun which accelerate a magnetic mass to a high velocity, or ion cannons and plasma cannons which focus and direct charged particles using magnetic fields.

Magnetic gun may refer to:

A proof test is a form of stress test to demonstrate the fitness of a load-bearing structure. An individual proof test may apply only to the unit tested, or to its design in general for mass-produced items. Such a structure is often subjected to loads above that expected in actual use, demonstrating safety and design margin. Proof testing is nominally a nondestructive test, particularly if both design margins and test levels are well-chosen. However, unit failures are by definition considered to have been destroyed for their originally-intended use and load levels.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">25 mm automatic air defense gun M1940 (72-K)</span> Anti-aircraft gun

25 mm automatic air defense gun M1940 (72-K) was a Soviet 25 mm caliber anti-aircraft gun used during the Great Patriotic War. The gun was developed from the end of 1939 to the beginning of 1940 at 8th Kalinin Artillery Plant under the guidance of its Chief Designer Mikhail Loginov, supervised by Lev Loktev. The cannon was given the factory code 72-K before being accepted into service by the Red Army as the 25 mm automatic air defense gun M1940.

.22 caliber, or 5.6 mm caliber, refers to a common firearms bore diameter of 0.22 inch (5.6 mm).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electro-Magnetic Laboratory Rail Gun</span>

The Electro-Magnetic Laboratory Rail Gun is a 32-megajoule electro-magnetic laboratory rail gun being evaluated by the US Office of Naval Research (ONR) Naval Air Warfare and Weapons Department. The US Navy is pursuing development of the launcher system through two industry teams -- General Atomics and BAE Systems - to reduce risk in the program and to foster innovation in next-generation shipboard weapons. The same amount of energy is released by the detonation of 4.8 kg (11 lb) of C4.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Excitation (magnetic)</span>

An electric generator or electric motor consists of a rotor spinning in a magnetic field. The magnetic field may be produced by permanent magnets or by field coils. In the case of a machine with field coils, a current must flow in the coils to generate the field, otherwise no power is transferred to or from the rotor. The process of generating a magnetic field by means of an electric current is called excitation. Field coils yield the most flexible form of magnetic flux regulation and de-regulation, but at the expense of a flow of electric current. Hybrid topologies exist, which incorporate both permanent magnets and field coils in the same configuration. The flexible excitation of a rotating electrical machine is employed by either brushless excitation techniques or by the injection of current by carbon brushes.

A plasma railgun is a linear accelerator which, like a projectile railgun, uses two long parallel electrodes to accelerate a "sliding short" armature. However, in a plasma railgun, the armature and ejected projectile consists of plasma, or hot, ionized, gas-like particles, instead of a solid slug of material. Scientific plasma railguns are typically operated in vacuum and not at air pressure. They are of value because they produce muzzle velocities of up to several hundreds of kilometers per second. Because of this, these devices have applications in magnetic confinement fusion (MCF), magneto-inertial fusion (MIF), high energy density physics research (HEDP), laboratory astrophysics, and as a plasma propulsion engine for spacecraft.

Sheet explosives are materials formed by combining an explosive with a "rubberizer"—a flexible binding agent. The resulting compound is cast into a flat sheet which is typically pliable and deformable over a wide range of temperature. Typical products are generally shock-insensitive secondary explosives, requiring a blasting cap or other detonator.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">10-pounder Parrott rifle</span> Rifled cannon

The 10-pounder Parrott rifle, Model 1861 was a cast iron muzzle-loading rifled cannon that was adopted by the United States Army in 1861 and often used in field artillery units during the American Civil War. Like other Parrott rifles, the gun breech was reinforced by a distinctive wrought iron reinforcing band. The gun fired a 9.5 lb (4.3 kg) projectile to a distance of 1,850 yd (1,692 m) at an elevation of 5°. The 10-pounder Parrott rifle was capable of firing shell, shrapnel shell, canister shot, or solid shot. Midway through the war, the Federal government discontinued the 2.9 in (74 mm) version in favor of a 3.0 in (76 mm) version. Despite the reinforcing band, the guns occasionally burst without warning, inflicting injury on the gun crews. The Confederate States of America manufactured a number of successful copies of the gun.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">20-pounder Parrott rifle</span> Type of rifled cannon

The 20-pounder Parrott rifle, Model 1861 was a cast iron muzzle-loading rifled cannon that was adopted by the United States Army in 1861 and employed in field artillery units during the American Civil War. As with other Parrott rifles, the gun breech was reinforced by a distinctive wrought iron reinforcing band. The gun fired a 20 lb (9.1 kg) projectile to a distance of 1,900 yd (1,737 m) at an elevation of 5°. The 20-pounder Parrott rifle could fire shell, shrapnel shell, canister shot, and more rarely solid shot. In spite of the reinforcing band, the 20-pounder earned a dubious reputation for bursting without warning, killing or injuring gunners. The Confederate States of America also manufactured copies of the gun.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Zielinski, Alexander; Werst, Michael (July 1995). Rapid Fire Railgun For The Cannon Caliber Electromagnetic Gun System. 8th Electromagnetic Launch Symposium. Baltimore, Maryland.
  2. Fontani, Harry (November 10, 1999). Electric Launch: An Inevitable Technology. 18th International Symposium on Ballistics. San Antonio, Texas. pp. 325–326. ISBN   9781566769013.
  3. Tzeng, Jerome; Schmidt, Edward (2004). "Advanced Materials Bring Electromagnetic Gun Technology One Step Closer to the Battlefield". AMPTIAC Quarterly. 8 (4): 79–84. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.383.9304 .
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 Werst, Michael; Hotz, Thomas; Kitzmiller, Jon; Penney, Chuck; Telander, R.M. (January 1997). "Testing of the Cannon Caliber Rapid Fire Railgun". IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 33 (1): 613–618. Bibcode:1997ITM....33..613W. doi:10.1109/20.560084. hdl: 2152/30557 .
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Zielinski, Alexander; Werst, Michael (January 1997). "Cannon-Caliber Electromagnetic Launcher". IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 33 (1): 630–635. Bibcode:1997ITM....33..630Z. doi:10.1109/20.560087.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 Zelinski, Alexander; Weinacht, Paul; Webb, David; Soencksen, Keith (March 1997). An Investigation of the Ballistic Performance for an Electromagnetic Gun-Launched Projectile (Report). The U.S. Army Research Laboratory. ADA326880. Archived from the original on April 25, 2022 via Defense Technical Information Center.
  7. 1 2 Price, J.H.; Yun, H.D.; Kajs, J.P.; Kitzmiller, J.R.; Pratap, S.B.; Werst, M.D. (January 1995). "Discarding armature and barrel optimization for a cannon caliber electromagnetic launcher system". IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 31 (1): 225–230. Bibcode:1995ITM....31..225P. doi:10.1109/20.364697. hdl: 2152/30918 .
  8. Zielinski, A.E.; Soencksen, K.; Webb, D.W.; Weinacht, P. (January 1997). "Integrated launch package performance in the cannon-caliber launcher". IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 33 (1): 163–168. Bibcode:1997ITM....33..163Z. doi:10.1109/20.559936.
  9. Zielinski, A.; Hildenbrand, D. (January 1997). "Observation and simulation of armature contact performance in the cannon-caliber electromagnetic gun". IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 33 (1): 157–162. Bibcode:1997ITM....33..157Z. doi:10.1109/20.559935.
  10. Zielinski, A.E.; Weinacht, P. (January 1999). "Effect of railgun electrodynamics on projectile launch dynamics". IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 35 (1): 118–123. Bibcode:1999ITM....35..118Z. doi:10.1109/20.738388.
  11. Zielinski, A.E.; Weinacht, P.; Powell, J.D. (January 1999). "Effect of railgun electrodynamics on armature discard". IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 35 (1): 112–117. Bibcode:1999ITM....35..112Z. doi:10.1109/20.738387.