Carl Moyer Memorial Air Quality Standards Attainment Program

Last updated

The Carl Moyer Memorial Air Quality Standards Attainment Program (Carl Moyer Program) is a State of California engine retrofit and replacement program implemented through the cooperative efforts of local air districts such as the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) and the California Air Resources Board (ARB). The BAAQMD's Carl Moyer Program is managed by the Air District's Strategic Incentives Division (SID). [1] The program provides grant funding to encourage the voluntary purchase of cleaner-than-required engines, equipment, and emission reduction technologies in an effort to rapidly reduce air pollution. While regulations continue to be the primary means to reduce air pollution emissions, the Carl Moyer Program plays a complementary role to California’s regulatory program by funding emission reductions that are surplus, that is, early and/or in excess of what is required by regulation.

Contents

Objectives

The Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) utilizes the Carl Moyer Program to reduce air pollution, especially criteria air pollutants such as airborne particulate matter, ozone, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide and lead, in impacted communities in the San Francisco Bay Area. The program provides financial incentives for equipment and vehicle owners to replace or retrofit high polluting engines and equipment. Highly impacted communities are generally economically disadvantaged residential areas located close to industrialized areas with large populations of young children and the elderly. [2] Residents of communities highly impacted by pollution are at higher risk of pollution-related health problems. [3] As an added benefit, the program stimulates the local economy by providing more jobs for engine repair shops and helps businesses by offering incentives for maintenance they would have to implement eventually. [4]

Administration

The ARB annually allocates funds to participating local air districts who implement the program for that program cycle (CMP Year). The Bay Area Air Quality Management District's Strategic Incentives Division administers the program in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Program results

The BAAQMD has funded emission reduction projects through the Carl Moyer Program for 11 years and is entering into Year 12 in spring of 2010. In 2008, the Air District upgraded 360 heavy-duty diesel engines, with 90% of funds awarded to projects in San Francisco Bay Area impacted communities. Estimated lifetime emissions reduction for the projects funded were 113 tons of reactive organic gases (ROG), 1,133 tons of nitrogen oxide (NO), and 45 tons of particulate matter (PM) for a total reduction of 1,291 tons. [5] In 2007, the Air District upgraded 300 heavy-duty diesel engines, with 67% of funds awarded to projects in San Francisco Bay Area impacted communities. Estimated lifetime emissions reduction for the projects funded were 1,225 tons of reactive organic gases (ROG), 9,700 tons of nitrogen oxide (NO), and 410 tons of particulate matter (PM) for a total reduction of 11,335 tons. [6]

On a state level, over its first six years, the Carl Moyer Program cleaned up approximately 6,300 engines, reduced nitrogen oxide emissions by over 18 tons per day, and reduced particulate matter emissions by one ton per day. During this same period it is estimated that the program helped to reduce lost workdays by 17,000 and prevented 2,800 asthma attacks and 100 premature deaths. These and other avoided health and welfare impacts have an estimated mean economic valuation of $790 million. [7]

The grant process

The Bay Area Air Quality Management District awards Carl Moyer Program funds on a first-come, first-served basis to applicants with completed applications. Projects over $100,000 go to the Air District’s Mobile Source Committee for approval, while projects under $100,000 are approved by an Air Pollution Control Officer. [8] Projects are weighted based on emissions reductions.

Once the applicant is awarded funding, they must take part in a pre-project inspection. All existing engines funded must be in working condition at the time of the award. Once the inspection is complete, Strategic Incentives Division staff sends the applicant the grant agreement for review and signature. When fully executed, the grantee can order the engine or equipment and the project can begin.

Eligible projects

The Bay Area Air Quality Management District’s Carl Moyer Program provides grants to public and private entities to reduce emissions of nitrogen oxides, reactive organic gases and particulate matter from existing heavy-duty engines by repowering, retrofitting, or replacing them. The Carl Moyer Program can be used for engine repower and retrofit projects and components of the program such as the Off-Road Equipment Replacement Program (ERP) [9] and the Voucher Incentive Program (VIP) [10] can be used for equipment replacement projects.

Engine repowering is when an existing engine is replaced with a new one. The time it takes to repower an engine varies depending on the size and application of the engine. An engine retrofit is when new components, such as catalysts or filters, are added to an existing engine. Engine retrofits typically take a few hours, after which the engine can immediately be put to use. Equipment Replacement projects consist of replacing the entire unit (chassis and engine) with a new, cleaner piece of equipment.

The Carl Moyer Program provides funding to five categories of heavy-duty diesel engines: [3]

  1. Agricultural Vehicles and Equipment - Project examples: repower and or retrofit irrigation pumps.
  2. Locomotives - Project examples: alternative switchers, idle limiting device, remanufactured engines, and repower and/or retrofit. [11]
  3. Marine Vehicles and Equipment - Project examples: repower and/or retrofit commercial vessels, new vessel purchase and cold ironing oceangoing vessels. [12]
  4. Off-road Vehicles and Equipment - Project examples: repower, retrofit and replace tractors and other agricultural equipment, construction equipment, airport ground support equipment, forklifts. [13]
  5. On-road Vehicles and Equipment - Project examples: repower, retrofit or replace heavy-duty trucks, and buses. [14]

There are three forms of funding an applicant may receive under the Carl Moyer Program: [4]

  1. Up to 100% of the retrofit costs—including installation (installing particle traps or diesel oxidation catalysts)
  2. Up to 85% of repower costs, including installation. Repowering is the replacement of the in-use engine with a new engine.
  3. Up to 25% of new vehicle or equipment purchases that are cleaner than the law requires
  4. Up to 85% of the new equipment (Off-Road category only)
  5. Up to $45,000 for a new heavy duty diesel truck On-Road Voucher Incentive Program [10]

Budget

The Bay Area Air Quality Management District receives funding from the California Air Resources Board each fiscal year to implement the Carl Moyer Program. In the Carl Moyer Program’s first seven years, from 1998 to 2004, the State of California provided a total of $170 million through annual legislative allocations. Legislative changes in 2004 made provisions to grant the Carl Moyer Program $141 million every year through 2015. Annually, the Air District is awarded a portion of these funds to administer to Bay Area applicants.

The Carl Moyer Program is funded by California Smog Check fees and new tire purchase fees. The State collects and deposits into the Air Pollution Control Fund $6.00 (as of January, 2010) of the motor vehicle smog check fee to implement the Carl Moyer Program “to the extent that…the moneys are expended to mitigate or remediate the harm caused by the type of motor vehicle on which the fee is imposed”. [15] The State also collects a $1.75 fee (as of January, 2010)on each new tire purchase for the Program. [16]

Assembly Bill 1390 requires that air districts across the state with greater than one million inhabitants allocate at least 50% of their Carl Moyer funding in a manner that directly benefits low-income communities and communities of color that are disproportionately affected by air pollution. The Bay Area Air Quality Management District continues to place additional emphasis on funding projects that reduce emissions in its six highest impacted areas within its jurisdiction.

Additionally, Mobile Source Incentive Funds are derived from Assembly Bill 923 (AB923), authorizes Air Districts located within a non-attainment area for any pollutant to impose a surcharge of up to $2.00 on the registration fee of motor vehicles registered in its district in order to pay for Carl Moyer-like projects and other emission reduction programs. The State collects these funds and passes them through directly to the respective Air District.

On December 21, 2004, the Air District's Board of Directors adopted Resolution 2004-16 to increase the surcharge on vehicles registered within the District boundaries from $4.00 to $6.00 per vehicle. The Department of Motor Vehicles began to collect the increased surcharge in May 2005. The revenues from the additional $2.00 surcharge are deposited in the District’ [17]

BAAQMD Carl Moyer program history

1998 – Carl Moyer Program is established. The program receives $25 million in funding. The Bay Area Air Quality Management District begins funding engine upgrades in the San Francisco Bay Area.

1999 – California Air Resources Board adopts the first set of Carl Moyer Program Guidelines and enacts legislation to formally establish the statutory framework for the program.

2001 – New legislation requires local districts with populations of over one million to expend 50% of the program funds for projects that operate or are based in environmental justice areas.

2004 – Funding is increased to $141 million per year and continued by new legislation. The program is expanded to include light-duty vehicle projects, agricultural sources of air pollution, and diesel truck pollution.

2005 – Program guidelines are expanded to include off-road projects and zero-emission technologies.

2006 – Air districts are allowed to increase administrative expenditures from 2% of program funds to 5% for air districts with more than 1 million inhabitants and to 10% for those with less than 1 million inhabitants.

2007 - Air District upgrades 300 heavy-duty diesel engines, which reduces emissions by 11,335 tons. [6]

2008 – Program guidelines are revised for the fifth time. [4] The Air District upgrades 360 diesel engines and reduces emissions by 1,291 tons. [5]

Impacted communities

The Bay Area Air Quality Management District Community Air Risk Evaluation (CARE) Program was initiated in 2004 to evaluate and reduce health risks associated with exposures to outdoor Toxic Air Contaminants (TAC’s) in the Bay Area. The program examines TAC emissions with an emphasis on diesel exhaust, which is a major contributor to airborne health risk in California. [18]

The CARE Program found that on-road vehicles contribute 34% of cancer toxicity-weighted emissions in the Bay Area. Further, it found that certain areas, which tend to be low-income areas near transportation corridors, bear a much greater health risk that others, and designated these as Priority Communities. [19] [20]

See also

Related Research Articles

The California Air Resources Board is an agency of the government of California that aims to reduce air pollution. Established in 1967 when then-governor Ronald Reagan signed the Mulford-Carrell Act, combining the Bureau of Air Sanitation and the Motor Vehicle Pollution Control Board, CARB is a department within the cabinet-level California Environmental Protection Agency.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vehicle emission standard</span> Legal requirements governing air pollutants released into the atmosphere

Emission standards are the legal requirements governing air pollutants released into the atmosphere. Emission standards set quantitative limits on the permissible amount of specific air pollutants that may be released from specific sources over specific timeframes. They are generally designed to achieve air quality standards and to protect human life. Different regions and countries have different standards for vehicle emissions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Exhaust gas</span> Gases emitted as a result of fuel reactions in combustion engines

Exhaust gas or flue gas is emitted as a result of the combustion of fuels such as natural gas, gasoline (petrol), diesel fuel, fuel oil, biodiesel blends, or coal. According to the type of engine, it is discharged into the atmosphere through an exhaust pipe, flue gas stack, or propelling nozzle. It often disperses downwind in a pattern called an exhaust plume.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diesel exhaust</span> Gaseous exhaust produced by a diesel engine

Diesel exhaust is the gaseous exhaust produced by a diesel type of internal combustion engine, plus any contained particulates. Its composition may vary with the fuel type or rate of consumption, or speed of engine operation, and whether the engine is in an on-road vehicle, farm vehicle, locomotive, marine vessel, or stationary generator or other application.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electric truck</span> Battery propelled freight motor vehicle

An electric truck is an electric vehicle powered by batteries designed to transport cargo, carry specialized payloads, or perform other utilitarian work.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diesel particulate filter</span> Removes diesel particulate matter or soot from the exhaust gas of a diesel engine

A diesel particulate filter (DPF) is a device designed to remove diesel particulate matter or soot from the exhaust gas of a diesel engine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Retrofitting</span> Addition of new technology or features to older systems

Retrofitting is the addition of new technology or features to older systems. Retrofits can happen for a number of reasons, for example with big capital expenditures like naval vessels, military equipment or manufacturing plants, businesses or governments may retrofit in order to reduce the need to replace a system entirely. Other retrofits may be due to changing codes or requirements, such as seismic retrofit which are designed strengthening older buildings in order to make them earthquake resistant.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spare the Air program</span>

Spare the Air is a program established by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District in 1991 to combat air pollution during the summer in the San Francisco Bay Area, the season when clear skies, hot temperatures, lighter winds, and a strong temperature inversion combine and trap air pollutants near the ground.

The Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) is a public agency that regulates the stationary sources of air pollution in the nine counties of California's San Francisco Bay Area: Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, southwestern Solano, and southern Sonoma. The BAAQMD is governed by a 24-member Board of Directors composed of elected officials from each of the nine Bay Area counties. The board has the duty of adopting air pollution regulations for the district. It is one of 35 Air Quality Management Districts in California.

The Acid Rain Program is a market-based initiative taken by the United States Environmental Protection Agency in an effort to reduce overall atmospheric levels of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, which cause acid rain. The program is an implementation of emissions trading that primarily targets coal-burning power plants, allowing them to buy and sell emission permits according to individual needs and costs. In 2011, the trading program that existed since 1995 was supplemented by four separate trading programs under the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR). On August 21, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia issued its Opinion and Order in the appeal of the Cross State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) for two independent legal reasons. The stay on CSAPR was lifted in October 2014, allowing implementation of the law and its trading programs to begin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Portable emissions measurement system</span> Automotive emissions instrument

A portable emissions measurement system (PEMS) is a vehicle emissions testing device that is small and light enough to be carried inside or moved with a motor vehicle that is being driven during testing, rather than on the stationary rollers of a dynamometer that only simulates real-world driving.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Greenhouse gas emissions by the United States</span> Climate changing gases from the North American country

The United States produced 5.2 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in 2020, the second largest in the world after greenhouse gas emissions by China and among the countries with the highest greenhouse gas emissions per person. In 2019 China is estimated to have emitted 27% of world GHG, followed by the United States with 11%, then India with 6.6%. In total the United States has emitted a quarter of world GHG, more than any other country. Annual emissions are over 15 tons per person and, amongst the top eight emitters, is the highest country by greenhouse gas emissions per person. However, the IEA estimates that the richest decile in the US emits over 55 tonnes of CO2 per capita each year. Because coal-fired power stations are gradually shutting down, in the 2010s emissions from electricity generation fell to second place behind transportation which is now the largest single source. In 2020, 27% of the GHG emissions of the United States were from transportation, 25% from electricity, 24% from industry, 13% from commercial and residential buildings and 11% from agriculture. In 2021, the electric power sector was the second largest source of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, accounting for 25% of the U.S. total. These greenhouse gas emissions are contributing to climate change in the United States, as well as worldwide.

United States vehicle emission standards are set through a combination of legislative mandates enacted by Congress through Clean Air Act (CAA) amendments from 1970 onwards, and executive regulations managed nationally by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and more recently along with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). These standard cover common motor vehicle air pollution, including carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and particulate emissions, and newer versions have incorporated fuel economy standards.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Clean Air Act (United States)</span> 1963 United States federal law to control air pollution

The Clean Air Act (CAA) is the United States' primary federal air quality law, intended to reduce and control air pollution nationwide. Initially enacted in 1963 and amended many times since, it is one of the United States' first and most influential modern environmental laws.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pollution in California</span> Overview of pollution in the U.S. state of California

Pollution in California relates to the degree of pollution in the air, water, and land of the U.S. state of California. Pollution is defined as the addition of any substance or any form of energy to the environment at a faster rate than it can be dispersed, diluted, decomposed, recycled, or stored in some harmless form. The combination of three main factors is the cause of notable unhealthy levels of air pollution in California: the activities of over 39 million people, a mountainous terrain that traps pollution, and a warm climate that helps form ozone and other pollutants. Eight of the ten cities in the US with the highest year-round concentration of particulate matter between 2013 and 2015 were in California, and seven out of the ten cities in the US with the worst ozone pollution were also in California. Studies show that pollutants prevalent in California are linked to several health issues, including asthma, lung cancer, birth complications, and premature death. In 2016, Bakersfield, California recorded the highest level of airborne pollutants of any city in the United States.

The Diesel Emissions Reduction Act, or DERA, is a part of the Energy Policy Act of 2005. The law appropriated funds to federal and state loan programs to either rebuild diesel-powered vehicle engines to more stringent emission standards or install emission reduction systems, notify affected parties, and share the technological information with countries that have poor air quality standards.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Idle (engine)</span>

Idling refers to running a vehicle's engine and the vehicle is not in motion, or when the vehicle drops to its resting point of RPMs. This commonly occurs when drivers are stopped at a red light, waiting while parked outside a business or residence, or otherwise stationary with the engine running. When idling, the engine runs without any loads except the engine accessories, and without the additional fuel via the gas pedal. If the vehicle moves while in gear and idling, The "idle speed" mechanically should be adjusted.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States hydrogen policy</span>

The principle of a fuel cell was discovered by Christian Friedrich Schönbein in 1838, and the first fuel cell was constructed by Sir William Robert Grove in 1839. The fuel cells made at this time were most similar to today's phosphoric acid fuel cells. Most hydrogen fuel cells today are of the proton exchange membrane (PEM) type. A PEM converts the chemical energy released during the electrochemical reaction of hydrogen and oxygen into electrical energy. The Hydrogen Research, Development, and Demonstration Act of 1990 and Energy Policy Act of 1992 were the first national legislative articles that called for large-scale hydrogen demonstration, development, and research programs. A five-year program was conducted that investigated the production of hydrogen from renewable energy sources and the feasibility of existing natural gas pipelines to carry hydrogen. It also called for the research into hydrogen storage systems for electric vehicles and the development of fuel cells suitable to power an electric motor vehicle.

The California Statewide Truck and Bus Rule was initially adopted in December 2008 by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and requires all heavy-duty diesel trucks and buses that operate in California to retrofit or replace engines in order to reduce diesel emissions. All privately and federally owned diesel-fueled trucks and buses, and privately and publicly owned school buses with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) greater than 14,000 pounds, are covered by the regulation.

In response to widespread concerns about a general increase in the temperature of the earth's climate, a number of tax jurisdictions have proposed or imposed global warming taxes intended to generate revenues to mitigate the effects of the human activities contributing to global warming or to discourage such activities.

References

  1. ↑ Bay Area Air Quality Management District, "Strategic Incentives Division"., Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Retrieved March 11, 2010.
  2. ↑ Bay Area Air Quality Management District (December 2009) "Applied Method for Developing Polygon Boundaries for CARE Impacted Communities". Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Retrieved March 10, 2010
  3. 1 2 Bay Area Air Quality Management District, "Carl Moyer Program"., Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Retrieved March 10, 2010
  4. 1 2 3 California Environmental Protection Agency, Air Resources Board (April 22, 2008) "Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, Approved Revision" (PDF)., California Environmental Protection Agency, Air Resources Board, Retrieved March 10, 2010
  5. 1 2 Bay Area Air Quality Management District (2008) "Annual Report 2008"., Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Retrieved March 10, 2010
  6. 1 2 Bay Area Air Quality Management District (2007) "Annual Report 2007"., Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Retrieved March 10, 2010
  7. ↑ California Environmental Protection Agency, Air Resources Board (January 2007) "Carl Moyer Program Status Report 2006" (PDF).California Environmental Protection Agency, Air Resources Board, Retrieved March 10, 2010
  8. ↑ Bay Area Air Quality Management District, "Mobile Source Committee". Archived from the original on 2010-02-08., Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Retrieved March 10, 2010
  9. ↑ Bay Area Air Quality Management District, "Engine Replacement Program"., Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Retrieved March 10, 2010
  10. 1 2 Bay Area Air Quality Management District, "Voucher Incentive Program"., Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Retrieved March 10, 2010
  11. ↑ Zito, Kelly (November 18, 2009), Zito, Kelly (November 18, 2009). "Retrofit cuts diesel exhaust of train by 50%". The San Francisco Chronicle., San Francisco Chronicle, Retrieved March 10, 2010.
  12. ↑ Burt, Cecily (December 21, 2009), "Global shipping line first in Oakland to cut dangerous emissions"., Oakland Tribune, Retrieved March 10, 2010.
  13. ↑ Associated Press (February 16, 2010), "$517M of stimulus for Calif. EPA projects to date". Archived from the original on 2012-10-23., Business Week, Retrieved March 10, 2010.
  14. ↑ Zito, Kelly (July 28, 2009), Zito, Kelly (July 28, 2009). "Oakland port program to clean up trucks, air". The San Francisco Chronicle., San Francisco Chronicle, Retrieved March 10, 2010.
  15. ↑ California Department of Motor Vehicles (January 1, 2005) "Health and Safety Code section 44091.1". California Department of Motor Vehicles, Retrieved: March 10, 2010.
  16. ↑ Onecle (January 12, 2009) "Public Resources Code section 42885"., Onecle, Retrieved March 10, 2010.
  17. ↑ Bay Area Air Quality Management District (March 13, 2006) "Board Of Directors Mobile Source Committee Agenda" (PDF). Bay Area Air Quality Management District. March 13, 2006. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 21, 2011. Retrieved February 4, 2010.Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Retrieved March 10, 2010.
  18. ↑ Kay, Jane (September 27, 2007) Kay, Jane (September 27, 2007). "Big rigs at Port of Oakland linked to health woes". The San Francisco Chronicle., San Francisco Chronicle, Retrieved March 10, 2010.
  19. ↑ Bay Area Air Quality Management District, "CARE Program"., Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Retrieved March 10, 2010.
  20. ↑ Zito, Kelly (October 17, 2008) Zito, Kelly (October 17, 2008). "Not all share in Bay Area's cleansing air". The San Francisco Chronicle., San Francisco Chronicle, Retrieved March 10, 2010.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.