Sulfur dioxide

Last updated

Contents

Sulfur dioxide
Sulfur-dioxide-2D.svg
Sulfur-dioxide-3D-vdW.png
Sulfur-dioxide-ve-B-2D.png
Names
IUPAC name
Sulfur dioxide
Other names
  • Sulfurous anhydride
  • Sulfur(IV) oxide
Identifiers
3D model (JSmol)
3535237
ChEBI
ChEMBL
ChemSpider
ECHA InfoCard 100.028.359 OOjs UI icon edit-ltr-progressive.svg
EC Number
  • 231-195-2
E number E220 (preservatives)
1443
KEGG
MeSH Sulfur+dioxide
PubChem CID
RTECS number
  • WS4550000
UNII
UN number 1079, 2037
  • InChI=1S/O2S/c1-3-2 Yes check.svgY
    Key: RAHZWNYVWXNFOC-UHFFFAOYSA-N Yes check.svgY
  • InChI=1/O2S/c1-3-2
    Key: RAHZWNYVWXNFOC-UHFFFAOYAT
  • O=S=O
Properties
SO
2
Molar mass 64.066 g/mol
AppearanceColorless and pungent gas
Odor Pungent; similar to a just-struck match [1]
Density 2.619 kg m−3 [2]
Melting point −72 °C; −98 °F; 201 K
Boiling point −10 °C (14 °F; 263 K)
94 g/L [3]
forms sulfurous acid
Vapor pressure 230 kPa at 10 °C; 330 kPa at 20 °C; 462 kPa at 30 °C; 630 kPa at 40 °C [4]
Acidity (pKa)~1.81
Basicity (pKb)~12.19
−18.2·10−6 cm3/mol
Viscosity 12.82 μPa·s [5]
Structure
C2v
Digonal
Dihedral
1.62 D
Thermochemistry
Std molar
entropy (S⦵298)
248.223 J K−1 mol−1
−296.81 kJ mol−1
Hazards
GHS labelling:
GHS-pictogram-acid.svg GHS-pictogram-skull.svg
Danger
H314, H331 [6]
NFPA 704 (fire diamond)
NFPA 704.svgHealth 3: Short exposure could cause serious temporary or residual injury. E.g. chlorine gasFlammability 0: Will not burn. E.g. waterInstability 0: Normally stable, even under fire exposure conditions, and is not reactive with water. E.g. liquid nitrogenSpecial hazards (white): no code
3
0
0
Lethal dose or concentration (LD, LC):
3000 ppm (mouse, 30 min)
2520 ppm (rat, 1 hr) [7]
993 ppm (rat, 20 min)
611 ppm (rat, 5 hr)
764 ppm (mouse, 20 min)
1000 ppm (human, 10 min)
3000 ppm (human, 5 min) [7]
NIOSH (US health exposure limits):
PEL (Permissible)
TWA 5 ppm (13 mg/m3) [8]
REL (Recommended)
TWA 2 ppm (5 mg/m3) ST 5 ppm (13 mg/m3) [8]
IDLH (Immediate danger)
100 ppm [8]
Related compounds
Related sulfur oxides
Sulfur monoxide
Sulfur trioxide
Disulfur monoxide
Related compounds
 Ozone

Selenium dioxide
Sulfurous acid
Tellurium dioxide
Polonium dioxide

Except where otherwise noted, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C [77 °F], 100 kPa).
X mark.svgN  verify  (what is  Yes check.svgYX mark.svgN ?)

Sulfur dioxide (IUPAC-recommended spelling) or sulphur dioxide (traditional Commonwealth English) is the chemical compound with the formula S O
2. It is a toxic gas responsible for the odor of burnt matches. It is released naturally by volcanic activity and is produced as a by-product of copper extraction and the burning of sulfur-bearing fossil fuels. [9] It was known to alchemists as "volatile spirit of sulfur" since at least 16th century. [10]

Structure and bonding

SO2 is a bent molecule with C2v symmetry point group. A valence bond theory approach considering just s and p orbitals would describe the bonding in terms of resonance between two resonance structures.

Two resonance structures of sulfur dioxide Sulfur-dioxide-resonance-2D.svg
Two resonance structures of sulfur dioxide

The sulfur–oxygen bond has a bond order of 1.5. There is support for this simple approach that does not invoke d orbital participation. [11] In terms of electron-counting formalism, the sulfur atom has an oxidation state of +4 and a formal charge of +1.

Occurrence

The blue auroral glows of Io's upper atmosphere are caused by volcanic sulfur dioxide. Io Aurorae color.jpg
The blue auroral glows of Io's upper atmosphere are caused by volcanic sulfur dioxide.

Sulfur dioxide is found on Earth and exists in very small concentrations in the atmosphere at about 15 ppb. [12]

On other planets, sulfur dioxide can be found in various concentrations, the most significant being the atmosphere of Venus, where it is the third-most abundant atmospheric gas at 150 ppm. There, it reacts with water to form clouds of sulfuric acid, and is a key component of the planet's global atmospheric sulfur cycle and contributes to global warming. [13] It has been implicated as a key agent in the warming of early Mars, with estimates of concentrations in the lower atmosphere as high as 100 ppm, [14] though it only exists in trace amounts. On both Venus and Mars, as on Earth, its primary source is thought to be volcanic. The atmosphere of Io, a natural satellite of Jupiter, is 90% sulfur dioxide [15] and trace amounts are thought to also exist in the atmosphere of Jupiter. The James Webb Space Telescope has observed the presence of sulfur dioxide on the exoplanet WASP-39b, where it is formed through photochemistry in the planet's atmosphere. [16]

As an ice, it is thought to exist in abundance on the Galilean moons—as subliming ice or frost on the trailing hemisphere of Io, [17] and in the crust and mantle of Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto, possibly also in liquid form and readily reacting with water. [18]

Production

Sulfur dioxide is primarily produced for sulfuric acid manufacture (see contact process, but other processes predated that at least since 16th century [10] ). In the United States in 1979, 23.6 million metric tons (26 million U.S. short tons) of sulfur dioxide were used in this way, compared with 150,000 metric tons (165,347 U.S. short tons) used for other purposes. Most sulfur dioxide is produced by the combustion of elemental sulfur. Some sulfur dioxide is also produced by roasting pyrite and other sulfide ores in air. [19]

An experiment showing burning of sulfur in oxygen. A flow-chamber joined to a gas washing bottle (filled with a solution of methyl orange) is being used. The product is sulfur dioxide (SO2) with some traces of sulfur trioxide (SO3). The "smoke" that exits the gas washing bottle is, in fact, a sulfuric acid fog generated in the reaction.

Combustion routes

Sulfur dioxide is the product of the burning of sulfur or of burning materials that contain sulfur:

1⁄8S8 + O2 → SO2, ΔH = −297 kJ/mol

To aid combustion, liquified sulfur (140–150 °C, 284-302 °F) is sprayed through an atomizing nozzle to generate fine drops of sulfur with a large surface area. The reaction is exothermic, and the combustion produces temperatures of 1000–1600 °C (1832–2912 °F). The significant amount of heat produced is recovered by steam generation that can subsequently be converted to electricity. [19]

The combustion of hydrogen sulfide and organosulfur compounds proceeds similarly. For example:

H2S + 3⁄2O2 → SO2 + H2O

The roasting of sulfide ores such as pyrite, sphalerite, and cinnabar (mercury sulfide) also releases SO2: [20]

2 FeS2 + 11⁄2O2 → Fe2O3 + 4 SO2
ZnS + 3⁄2O2 → ZnO + SO2
HgS + O2 → Hg + SO2
2 FeS + 7⁄2O2 → Fe2O3 + 2 SO2

A combination of these reactions is responsible for the largest source of sulfur dioxide, volcanic eruptions. These events can release millions of tons of SO2.

Reduction of higher oxides

Sulfur dioxide can also be a byproduct in the manufacture of calcium silicate cement; CaSO4 is heated with coke and sand in this process:

2 CaSO4 + 2 SiO2 + C → 2 CaSiO3 + 2 SO2 + CO2

Until the 1970s, commercial quantities of sulfuric acid and cement were produced by this process in Whitehaven, England. Upon being mixed with shale or marl, and roasted, the sulfate liberated sulfur dioxide gas, used in sulfuric acid production, the reaction also produced calcium silicate, a precursor in cement production. [21]

On a laboratory scale, the action of hot concentrated sulfuric acid on copper turnings produces sulfur dioxide.

Cu + 2 H2SO4 → CuSO4 + SO2 + 2 H2O

Tin also reacts with concentrated sulfuric acid but it produces tin(II) sulfate which can later be pyrolyzed at 360°C into tin dioxide and dry sulfur dioxide.

Sn + H2SO4 → SnSO4 + H2
SnSO4 → SnO2 + SO2

From sulfites

The reverse reaction occurs upon acidification:

H+ + HSO−3 → SO2 + H2O

Reactions

Sulfites results by the action of aqueous base on sulfur dioxide:

SO2 + 2 NaOH → Na2SO3 + H2O

Sulfur dioxide is a mild but useful reducing agent. It is oxidized by halogens to give the sulfuryl halides, such as sulfuryl chloride:

SO2 + Cl2 → SO2Cl2

Sulfur dioxide is the oxidising agent in the Claus process, which is conducted on a large scale in oil refineries. Here, sulfur dioxide is reduced by hydrogen sulfide to give elemental sulfur:

SO2 + 2 H2S → 3 S + 2 H2O

The sequential oxidation of sulfur dioxide followed by its hydration is used in the production of sulfuric acid.

SO2 + H2O + 1⁄2O2 → H2SO4

Sulfur dioxide dissolves in water to give "sulfurous acid", which cannot be isolated and is instead an acidic solution of bisulfite, and possibly sulfite, ions.

SO2 + H2O ⇌ HSO−3 + H+          Ka = 1.54×10−2; pKa = 1.81

Laboratory reactions

Sulfur dioxide is one of the few common acidic yet reducing gases. It turns moist litmus pink (being acidic), then white (due to its bleaching effect). It may be identified by bubbling it through a dichromate solution, turning the solution from orange to green (Cr3+ (aq)). It can also reduce ferric ions to ferrous. [22]

Sulfur dioxide can react with certain 1,3-dienes in a cheletropic reaction to form cyclic sulfones. This reaction is exploited on an industrial scale for the synthesis of sulfolane, which is an important solvent in the petrochemical industry.

Cheletropic reaction of butadiene with SO2.svg

Sulfur dioxide can bind to metal ions as a ligand to form metal sulfur dioxide complexes, typically where the transition metal is in oxidation state 0 or +1. Many different bonding modes (geometries) are recognized, but in most cases, the ligand is monodentate, attached to the metal through sulfur, which can be either planar and pyramidal η 1. [9] As a η1-SO2 (S-bonded planar) ligand sulfur dioxide functions as a Lewis base using the lone pair on S. SO2 functions as a Lewis acids in its η1-SO2 (S-bonded pyramidal) bonding mode with metals and in its 1:1 adducts with Lewis bases such as dimethylacetamide and trimethyl amine. When bonding to Lewis bases the acid parameters of SO2 are EA = 0.51 and EA = 1.56.

Uses

The overarching, dominant use of sulfur dioxide is in the production of sulfuric acid. [19]

Precursor to sulfuric acid

Sulfur dioxide is an intermediate in the production of sulfuric acid, being converted to sulfur trioxide, and then to oleum, which is made into sulfuric acid. Sulfur dioxide for this purpose is made when sulfur combines with oxygen. The method of converting sulfur dioxide to sulfuric acid is called the contact process. Several million tons are produced annually for this purpose.

Food preservative

Sulfur dioxide is sometimes used as a preservative for dried apricots, dried figs, and other dried fruits, owing to its antimicrobial properties and ability to prevent oxidation, [23] and is called E220 [24] when used in this way in Europe. As a preservative, it maintains the colorful appearance of the fruit and prevents rotting. It is also added to sulfured molasses. Sublimed sulfur is ignited and burned in an enclosed space with the fruits. This is usually done outdoors. [25] Fruits may be sulfured by dipping them into an either sodium bisulfite, sodium sulfite or sodium metabisulfite. [25]

Winemaking

Sulfur dioxide was first used in winemaking by the Romans, when they discovered that burning sulfur candles inside empty wine vessels keeps them fresh and free from vinegar smell. [26]

It is still an important compound in winemaking, and is measured in parts per million (ppm) in wine. It is present even in so-called unsulfurated wine at concentrations of up to 10 mg/L. [27] It serves as an antibiotic and antioxidant, protecting wine from spoilage by bacteria and oxidation - a phenomenon that leads to the browning of the wine and a loss of cultivar specific flavors. [28] [29] Its antimicrobial action also helps minimize volatile acidity. Wines containing sulfur dioxide are typically labeled with "containing sulfites".

Sulfur dioxide exists in wine in free and bound forms, and the combinations are referred to as total SO2. Binding, for instance to the carbonyl group of acetaldehyde, varies with the wine in question. The free form exists in equilibrium between molecular SO2 (as a dissolved gas) and bisulfite ion, which is in turn in equilibrium with sulfite ion. These equilibria depend on the pH of the wine. Lower pH shifts the equilibrium towards molecular (gaseous) SO2, which is the active form, while at higher pH more SO2 is found in the inactive sulfite and bisulfite forms. The molecular SO2 is active as an antimicrobial and antioxidant, and this is also the form which may be perceived as a pungent odor at high levels. Wines with total SO2 concentrations below 10 ppm do not require "contains sulfites" on the label by US and EU laws. The upper limit of total SO2 allowed in wine in the US is 350 ppm; in the EU it is 160 ppm for red wines and 210 ppm for white and rosé wines. In low concentrations, SO2 is mostly undetectable in wine, but at free SO2 concentrations over 50 ppm, SO2 becomes evident in the smell and taste of wine.[ citation needed ]

SO2 is also a very important compound in winery sanitation. Wineries and equipment must be kept clean, and because bleach cannot be used in a winery due to the risk of cork taint, [30] a mixture of SO2, water, and citric acid is commonly used to clean and sanitize equipment. Ozone (O3) is now used extensively for sanitizing in wineries due to its efficacy, and because it does not affect the wine or most equipment. [31]

As a reducing agent

Sulfur dioxide is also a good reductant. In the presence of water, sulfur dioxide is able to decolorize substances. Specifically, it is a useful reducing bleach for papers and delicate materials such as clothes. This bleaching effect normally does not last very long. Oxygen in the atmosphere reoxidizes the reduced dyes, restoring the color. In municipal wastewater treatment, sulfur dioxide is used to treat chlorinated wastewater prior to release. Sulfur dioxide reduces free and combined chlorine to chloride. [32]

Sulfur dioxide is fairly soluble in water, and by both IR and Raman spectroscopy; the hypothetical sulfurous acid, H2SO3, is not present to any extent. However, such solutions do show spectra of the hydrogen sulfite ion, HSO3−, by reaction with water, and it is in fact the actual reducing agent present:

SO2 + H2O ⇌ HSO3− + H+

As a fumigant

In the beginning of the 20th century, sulfur dioxide was used in Buenos Aires as a fumigant to kill rats that carried the Yersinia pestis bacterium, which causes bubonic plague. The application was successful, and the application of this method was extended to other areas in South America. In Buenos Aires, where these apparatuses were known as Sulfurozador, but later also in Rio de Janeiro, New Orleans and San Francisco, the sulfur dioxide treatment machines were brought into the streets to enable extensive disinfection campaigns, with effective results. [33]

Biochemical and biomedical roles

Sulfur dioxide or its conjugate base bisulfite is produced biologically as an intermediate in both sulfate-reducing organisms and in sulfur-oxidizing bacteria, as well. The role of sulfur dioxide in mammalian biology is not yet well understood. [34] Sulfur dioxide blocks nerve signals from the pulmonary stretch receptors and abolishes the Hering–Breuer inflation reflex.

It is considered that endogenous sulfur dioxide plays a significant physiological role in regulating cardiac and blood vessel function, and aberrant or deficient sulfur dioxide metabolism can contribute to several different cardiovascular diseases, such as arterial hypertension, atherosclerosis, pulmonary arterial hypertension, and stenocardia. [35]

It was shown that in children with pulmonary arterial hypertension due to congenital heart diseases the level of homocysteine is higher and the level of endogenous sulfur dioxide is lower than in normal control children. Moreover, these biochemical parameters strongly correlated to the severity of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Authors considered homocysteine to be one of useful biochemical markers of disease severity and sulfur dioxide metabolism to be one of potential therapeutic targets in those patients. [36]

Endogenous sulfur dioxide also has been shown to lower the proliferation rate of endothelial smooth muscle cells in blood vessels, via lowering the MAPK activity and activating adenylyl cyclase and protein kinase A. [37] Smooth muscle cell proliferation is one of important mechanisms of hypertensive remodeling of blood vessels and their stenosis, so it is an important pathogenetic mechanism in arterial hypertension and atherosclerosis.

Endogenous sulfur dioxide in low concentrations causes endothelium-dependent vasodilation. In higher concentrations it causes endothelium-independent vasodilation and has a negative inotropic effect on cardiac output function, thus effectively lowering blood pressure and myocardial oxygen consumption. The vasodilating and bronchodilating effects of sulfur dioxide are mediated via ATP-dependent calcium channels and L-type ("dihydropyridine") calcium channels. Endogenous sulfur dioxide is also a potent antiinflammatory, antioxidant and cytoprotective agent. It lowers blood pressure and slows hypertensive remodeling of blood vessels, especially thickening of their intima. It also regulates lipid metabolism. [38]

Endogenous sulfur dioxide also diminishes myocardial damage, caused by isoproterenol adrenergic hyperstimulation, and strengthens the myocardial antioxidant defense reserve. [39]

As a reagent and solvent in the laboratory

Sulfur dioxide is a versatile inert solvent widely used for dissolving highly oxidizing salts. It is also used occasionally as a source of the sulfonyl group in organic synthesis. Treatment of aryl diazonium salts with sulfur dioxide and cuprous chloride yields the corresponding aryl sulfonyl chloride, for example: [40]

Preparation of m-trifluoromethylbenzenesulfonyl chloride.svg

As a result of its very low Lewis basicity, it is often used as a low-temperature solvent/diluent for superacids like magic acid (FSO3H/SbF5), allowing for highly reactive species like tert-butyl cation to be observed spectroscopically at low temperature (though tertiary carbocations do react with SO2 above about –30 °C, and even less reactive solvents like SO2ClF must be used at these higher temperatures). [41]

As a refrigerant

Being easily condensed and possessing a high heat of evaporation, sulfur dioxide is a candidate material for refrigerants. Before the development of chlorofluorocarbons, sulfur dioxide was used as a refrigerant in home refrigerators.

Safety

US Geological Survey volunteer tests for sulfur dioxide after the 2018 lower Puna eruption. 20180519 USGS Leilani Estates Hawaii Volcanic EruptionDSC 0411 medium.jpg
US Geological Survey volunteer tests for sulfur dioxide after the 2018 lower Puna eruption.

Ingestion

In the United States, the Center for Science in the Public Interest lists the two food preservatives, sulfur dioxide and sodium bisulfite, as being safe for human consumption except for certain asthmatic individuals who may be sensitive to them, especially in large amounts. [42] Symptoms of sensitivity to sulfiting agents, including sulfur dioxide, manifest as potentially life-threatening trouble breathing within minutes of ingestion. [43] Sulphites may also cause symptoms in non-asthmatic individuals, namely dermatitis, urticaria, flushing, hypotension, abdominal pain and diarrhea, and even life-threatening anaphylaxis. [44]

Inhalation

Incidental exposure to sulfur dioxide is routine, e.g. the smoke from matches, coal, and sulfur-containing fuels like bunker fuel. Relative to other chemicals, it is only mildly toxic and requires high concentrations to be actively hazardous. [45] However, its ubiquity makes it a major air pollutant with significant impacts on human health. [46]

In 2008, the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists reduced the short-term exposure limit to 0.25 parts per million (ppm). In the US, the OSHA set the PEL at 5 ppm (13 mg/m3) time-weighted average. Also in the US, NIOSH set the IDLH at 100 ppm. [47] In 2010, the EPA "revised the primary SO2 NAAQS by establishing a new one-hour standard at a level of 75 parts per billion (ppb). EPA revoked the two existing primary standards because they would not provide additional public health protection given a one-hour standard at 75 ppb." [46]

Environmental role

Air pollution

Volcanic "injection" Volcanic injection.svg
Volcanic "injection"

Major volcanic eruptions have an overwhelming effect on sulfate aerosol concentrations in the years when they occur: eruptions ranking 4 or greater on the Volcanic Explosivity Index inject SO2 and water vapor directly into the stratosphere, where they react to create sulfate aerosol plumes. [48] Volcanic emissions vary significantly in composition, and have complex chemistry due to the presence of ash particulates and a wide variety of other elements in the plume. Only stratovolcanoes containing primarily felsic magmas are responsible for these fluxes, as mafic magma erupted in shield volcanoes doesn't result in plumes which reach the stratosphere. [49] However, before the Industrial Revolution, dimethyl sulfide pathway was the largest contributor to sulfate aerosol concentrations in a more average year with no major volcanic activity. According to the IPCC First Assessment Report, published in 1990, volcanic emissions usually amounted to around 10 million tons in 1980s, while dimethyl sulfide amounted to 40 million tons. Yet, by that point, the global human-caused emissions of sulfur into the atmosphere became "at least as large" as all natural emissions of sulfur-containing compounds combined: they were at less than 3 million tons per year in 1860, and then they increased to 15 million tons in 1900, 40 million tons in 1940 and about 80 millions in 1980. The same report noted that "in the industrialized regions of Europe and North America, anthropogenic emissions dominate over natural emissions by about a factor of ten or even more". [50] In the eastern United States, sulfate particles were estimated to account for 25% or more of all air pollution. [51] Exposure to sulfur dioxide emissions by coal power plants (coal PM2.5) in the US was associated with 2.1 times greater mortality risk than exposure to PM2.5 from all sources. [52] Meanwhile, the Southern Hemisphere had much lower concentrations due to being much less densely populated, with an estimated 90% of the human population in the north. In the early 1990s, anthropogenic sulfur dominated in the Northern Hemisphere, where only 16% of annual sulfur emissions were natural, yet amounted for less than half of the emissions in the Southern Hemisphere. [53]

Acid rain-damaged forest in Europe's Black Triangle Acid rain woods1.JPG
Acid rain-damaged forest in Europe's Black Triangle

Such an increase in sulfate aerosol emissions had a variety of effects. At the time, the most visible one was acid rain, caused by precipitation from clouds carrying high concentrations of sulfate aerosols in the troposphere. [54] At its peak, acid rain has eliminated brook trout and some other fish species and insect life from lakes and streams in geographically sensitive areas, such as Adirondack Mountains in the United States. [55] Acid rain worsens soil function as some of its microbiota is lost and heavy metals like aluminium are mobilized (spread more easily) while essential nutrients and minerals such as magnesium can leach away because of the same. Ultimately, plants unable to tolerate lowered pH are killed, with montane forests being some of the worst-affected ecosystems due to their regular exposure to sulfate-carrying fog at high altitudes. [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] While acid rain was too dilute to affect human health directly, breathing smog or even any air with elevated sulfate concentrations is known to contribute to heart and lung conditions, including asthma and bronchitis. [51] Further, this form of pollution is linked to preterm birth and low birth weight, with a study of 74,671 pregnant women in Beijing finding that every additional 100 µg/m3 of SO2 in the air reduced infants' weight by 7.3 g, making it and other forms of air pollution the largest attributable risk factor for low birth weight ever observed. [61]

Control measures

Early 2010s estimates of past and future anthropogenic global sulfur dioxide emissions, including the Representative Concentration Pathways. While no climate change scenario may reach Maximum Feasible Reductions (MFRs), all assume steep declines from today's levels. By 2019, sulfate emission reductions were confirmed to proceed at a very fast rate. Estimates of past and future SO2 global anthropogenic emissions.png
Early 2010s estimates of past and future anthropogenic global sulfur dioxide emissions, including the Representative Concentration Pathways. While no climate change scenario may reach Maximum Feasible Reductions (MFRs), all assume steep declines from today's levels. By 2019, sulfate emission reductions were confirmed to proceed at a very fast rate.

Due largely to the US EPA's Acid Rain Program, the U.S. has had a 33% decrease in emissions between 1983 and 2002 (see table). This improvement resulted in part from flue-gas desulfurization, a technology that enables SO2 to be chemically bound in power plants burning sulfur-containing coal or petroleum.

YearSO2
197031,161,000 short tons (28.3 Mt)
198025,905,000 short tons (23.5 Mt)
199023,678,000 short tons (21.5 Mt)
199618,859,000 short tons (17.1 Mt)
199719,363,000 short tons (17.6 Mt)
199819,491,000 short tons (17.7 Mt)
199918,867,000 short tons (17.1 Mt)

In particular, calcium oxide (lime) reacts with sulfur dioxide to form calcium sulfite:

CaO + SO2 → CaSO3

Aerobic oxidation of the CaSO3 gives CaSO4, anhydrite. Most gypsum sold in Europe comes from flue-gas desulfurization.

To control sulfur emissions, dozens of methods with relatively high efficiencies have been developed for fitting of coal-fired power plants. [63] Sulfur can be removed from coal during burning by using limestone as a bed material in fluidized bed combustion. [64]

Sulfur can also be removed from fuels before burning, preventing formation of SO2 when the fuel is burnt. The Claus process is used in refineries to produce sulfur as a byproduct. The Stretford process has also been used to remove sulfur from fuel. Redox processes using iron oxides can also be used, for example, Lo-Cat [65] or Sulferox. [66]

Fuel additives such as calcium additives and magnesium carboxylate may be used in marine engines to lower the emission of sulfur dioxide gases into the atmosphere. [67]

Impact on climate change

This section is an excerpt from Global dimming § History.[ edit ]
The observed trends of global dimming and brightening in four major geopolitical regions. The dimming was greater on the average cloud-free days (red line) than on the average of all days (purple line), strongly suggesting that sulfate aerosols were the cause. Julsrud 2022 dimming.jpg
The observed trends of global dimming and brightening in four major geopolitical regions. The dimming was greater on the average cloud-free days (red line) than on the average of all days (purple line), strongly suggesting that sulfate aerosols were the cause.
Subsequent research estimated an average reduction in sunlight striking the terrestrial surface of around 4–5% per decade over late 1950s–1980s, and 2–3% per decade when 1990s were included. [69] [70] [71] [72] Notably, solar radiation at the top of the atmosphere did not vary by more than 0.1-0.3% in all that time, strongly suggesting that the reasons for the dimming were on Earth. [73] [74] Additionally, only visible light and infrared radiation were dimmed, rather than the ultraviolet part of the spectrum. [75] Further, the dimming had occurred even when the skies were clear, and it was in fact stronger than during the cloudy days, proving that it was not caused by changes in cloud cover alone. [76] [74] [68]

Hydrological cycle

This section is an excerpt from Global dimming § Relationship to hydrological cycle.[ edit ]
Sulfate aerosols have decreased precipitation over most of Asia (red), but increased it over some parts of Central Asia (blue). Xie et al 2022 Asian aerosols.png
Sulfate aerosols have decreased precipitation over most of Asia (red), but increased it over some parts of Central Asia (blue).
On regional and global scale, air pollution can affect the water cycle, in a manner similar to some natural processes. One example is the impact of Sahara dust on hurricane formation: air laden with sand and mineral particles moves over the Atlantic Ocean, where they block some of the sunlight from reaching the water surface, slightly cooling it and dampening the development of hurricanes. [78] Likewise, it has been suggested since the early 2000s that since aerosols decrease solar radiation over the ocean and hence reduce evaporation from it, they would be "spinning down the hydrological cycle of the planet." [79] [80] In 2011, it was found that anthropogenic aerosols had been the predominant factor behind 20th century changes in rainfall over the Atlantic Ocean sector, [81] when the entire tropical rain belt shifted southwards between 1950 and 1985, with a limited northwards shift afterwards. [82] Future reductions in aerosol emissions are expected to result in a more rapid northwards shift, with limited impact in the Atlantic but a substantially greater impact in the Pacific. [83]

Projected impacts

The extent to which physical factors in the atmosphere or on land affect climate change, including the cooling provided by sulfate aerosols and the dimming they cause. The large error bar shows that there are still substantial unresolved uncertainties. Physical Drivers of climate change.svg
The extent to which physical factors in the atmosphere or on land affect climate change, including the cooling provided by sulfate aerosols and the dimming they cause. The large error bar shows that there are still substantial unresolved uncertainties.

Since changes in aerosol concentrations already have an impact on the global climate, they would necessarily influence future projections as well. In fact, it is impossible to fully estimate the warming impact of all greenhouse gases without accounting for the counteracting cooling from aerosols. Climate models started to account for the effects of sulfate aerosols around the IPCC Second Assessment Report; when the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report was published in 2007, every climate model had integrated sulfates, but only 5 were able to account for less impactful particulates like black carbon. [84] By 2021, CMIP6 models estimated total aerosol cooling in the range from 0.1 °C (0.18 °F) to 0.7 °C (1.3 °F); [85] The IPCC Sixth Assessment Report selected the best estimate of a 0.5 °C (0.90 °F) cooling provided by sulfate aerosols, while black carbon amounts to about 0.1 °C (0.18 °F) of warming. [86] While these values are based on combining model estimates with observational constraints, including those on ocean heat content, [87] the matter is not yet fully settled. The difference between model estimates mainly stems from disagreements over the indirect effects of aerosols on clouds. [88] [89]

It has also been suggested that aerosols are not given sufficient attention in regional risk assessments, in spite of being more influential on a regional scale than globally. [90] For instance, a climate change scenario with high greenhouse gas emissions but strong reductions in air pollution would see 0.2 °C (0.36 °F) more global warming by 2050 than the same scenario with little improvement in air quality, but regionally, the difference would add 5 more tropical nights per year in northern China and substantially increase precipitation in northern China and northern India. [91] Likewise, a paper comparing current level of clean air policies with a hypothetical maximum technically feasible action under otherwise the same climate change scenario found that the latter would increase the risk of temperature extremes by 30–50% in China and in Europe. [92] Unfortunately, because historical records of aerosols are sparser in some regions than in others, accurate regional projections of aerosol impacts are difficult. Even the latest CMIP6 climate models can only accurately represent aerosol trends over Europe, [68] but struggle with representing North America and Asia, meaning that their near-future projections of regional impacts are likely to contain errors as well. [93] [68] [94]

Solar geoengineering

Proposed tethered balloon to inject aerosols into the stratosphere SPICE SRM overview.jpg
Proposed tethered balloon to inject aerosols into the stratosphere
This section is an excerpt from Stratospheric aerosol injection § Pollution controls and the discovery of radiative effects.[ edit ]
As the real world had shown the importance of sulfate aerosol concentrations to the global climate, research into the subject accelerated. Formation of the aerosols and their effects on the atmosphere can be studied in the lab, with methods like ion-chromatography and mass spectrometry [95] Samples of actual particles can be recovered from the stratosphere using balloons or aircraft, [96] and remote satellites were also used for observation. [97] This data is fed into the climate models, [98] as the necessity of accounting for aerosol cooling to truly understand the rate and evolution of warming had long been apparent, with the IPCC Second Assessment Report being the first to include an estimate of their impact on climate, and every major model able to simulate them by the time IPCC Fourth Assessment Report was published in 2007. [99] Many scientists also see the other side of this research, which is learning how to cause the same effect artificially. [100] While discussed around the 1990s, if not earlier, [101] stratospheric aerosol injection as a solar geoengineering method is best associated with Paul Crutzen's detailed 2006 proposal. [102] Deploying in the stratosphere ensures that the aerosols are at their most effective, and that the progress of clean air measures would not be reversed: more recent research estimated that even under the highest-emission scenario RCP 8.5, the addition of stratospheric sulfur required to avoid 4 °C (7.2 °F) relative to now (and 5 °C (9.0 °F) relative to the preindustrial) would be effectively offset by the future controls on tropospheric sulfate pollution, and the amount required would be even less for less drastic warming scenarios. [103] This spurred a detailed look at its costs and benefits, [104] but even with hundreds of studies into the subject completed by the early 2020s, some notable uncertainties remain. [105]

Properties

Table of thermal and physical properties of saturated liquid sulfur dioxide: [106] [107]

Temperature (°C)Density (kg/m^3)Specific heat (kJ/kg K)Kinematic viscosity (m^2/s)Conductivity (W/m K)Thermal diffusivity (m^2/s)Prandtl NumberBulk modulus (K^-1)
-501560.841.35954.84E-070.2421.14E-074.24-
-401536.811.36074.24E-070.2351.13E-073.74-
-301520.641.36163.71E-070.231.12E-073.31-
-201488.61.36243.24E-070.2251.11E-072.93-
-101463.611.36282.88E-070.2181.10E-072.62-
01438.461.36362.57E-070.2111.08E-072.38-
101412.511.36452.32E-070.2041.07E-072.18-
201386.41.36532.10E-070.1991.05E-0721.94E-03
301359.331.36621.90E-070.1921.04E-071.83-
401329.221.36741.73E-070.1851.02E-071.7-
501299.11.36831.62E-070.1779.99E-081.61-

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Causes of climate change</span> Effort to scientifically ascertain mechanisms responsible for recent global warming

The scientific community has been investigating the causes of climate change for decades. After thousands of studies, it came to a consensus, where it is "unequivocal that human influence has warmed the atmosphere, ocean and land since pre-industrial times." This consensus is supported by around 200 scientific organizations worldwide, The dominant role in this climate change has been played by the direct emissions of carbon dioxide from the burning of fossil fuels. Indirect CO2 emissions from land use change, and the emissions of methane, nitrous oxide and other greenhouse gases play major supporting roles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Acid rain</span> Rain that is unusually acidic

Acid rain is rain or any other form of precipitation that is unusually acidic, meaning that it has elevated levels of hydrogen ions. Most water, including drinking water, has a neutral pH that exists between 6.5 and 8.5, but acid rain has a pH level lower than this and ranges from 4–5 on average. The more acidic the acid rain is, the lower its pH is. Acid rain can have harmful effects on plants, aquatic animals, and infrastructure. Acid rain is caused by emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide, which react with the water molecules in the atmosphere to produce acids.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sulfuric acid</span> Chemical compound (H₂SO₄)

Sulfuric acid or sulphuric acid, known in antiquity as oil of vitriol, is a mineral acid composed of the elements sulfur, oxygen, and hydrogen, with the molecular formula H2SO4. It is a colorless, odorless, and viscous liquid that is miscible with water.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cloud feedback</span> Type of climate change feedback mechanism

Cloud feedback is a type of climate change feedback that has been difficult to quantify in contemporary climate models. It can affect the magnitude of internally generated climate variability or they can affect the magnitude of climate change resulting from external radiative forcings. Cloud representations vary among global climate models, and small changes in cloud cover have a large impact on the climate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sulfate</span> Oxyanion with a central atom of sulfur surrounded by 4 oxygen atoms

The sulfate or sulphate ion is a polyatomic anion with the empirical formula SO2−4. Salts, acid derivatives, and peroxides of sulfate are widely used in industry. Sulfates occur widely in everyday life. Sulfates are salts of sulfuric acid and many are prepared from that acid.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sulfurous acid</span> Chemical compound

Sulfuric(IV) acid, also known as sulfurous (UK: sulphurous) acid and thionic acid, is the chemical compound with the formula H2SO3.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Global dimming</span> Reduction in the amount of sunlight reaching Earths surface

Global dimming is a decline in the amount of sunlight reaching the Earth's surface, a measure also known as global direct solar irradiance. It was observed soon after the first systematic measurements of solar irradiance began in the 1950s, and continued until 1980s, with an observed reduction of 4–5% per decade, even though solar activity did not vary more than the usual at the time. Instead, global dimming had been attributed to an increase in atmospheric particulate matter, predominantly sulfate aerosols, as the result of rapidly growing air pollution due to post-war industrialization. After 1980s, reductions in particulate emissions have also caused a "partial" reversal of the dimming trend, which has sometimes been described as a global brightening. This reversal is not yet complete, and it has also been globally uneven, as some of the brightening over the developed countries in the 1980s and 1990s had been counteracted by the increased dimming from the industrialization of the developing countries and the expansion of the global shipping industry, although they have also been making rapid progress in cleaning up air pollution in the recent years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Radiative forcing</span> Difference between solar irradiance absorbed by the Earth and energy radiated back to space

Radiative forcing is a concept used in climate science to quantify the change in energy balance in the Earth's atmosphere caused by various factors, such as concentrations of greenhouse gases, aerosols, and changes in solar radiation. In more technical terms, it is "the change in the net, downward minus upward, radiative flux due to a change in an external driver of climate change." These external drivers are distinguished from feedbacks and variability that are internal to the climate system, and that further influence the direction and magnitude of imbalance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sulfite</span> Oxyanion with a central atom of sulfur surrounded by 3 oxygen atoms

Sulfites or sulphites are compounds that contain the sulfite ion, SO2−
3. The sulfite ion is the conjugate base of bisulfite. Although its acid is elusive, its salts are widely used.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cloud condensation nuclei</span> Small particles on which water vapor condenses

Cloud condensation nuclei (CCNs), also known as cloud seeds, are small particles typically 0.2 µm, or one hundredth the size of a cloud droplet. CCNs are a unique subset of aerosols in the atmosphere on which water vapour condenses. This can affect the radiative properties of clouds and the overall atmosphere. Water requires a non-gaseous surface to make the transition from a vapour to a liquid; this process is called condensation.

In climatology, the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) is a collaborative framework designed to improve knowledge of climate change. It was organized in 1995 by the Working Group on Coupled Modelling (WGCM) of the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP). It is developed in phases to foster the climate model improvements but also to support national and international assessments of climate change. A related project is the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP) for global coupled ocean-atmosphere general circulation models (GCMs).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carbonyl sulfide</span> Chemical compound

Carbonyl sulfide is the chemical compound with the linear formula OCS. It is a colorless flammable gas with an unpleasant odor. It is a linear molecule consisting of a carbonyl double bonded to a sulfur atom. Carbonyl sulfide can be considered to be intermediate between carbon dioxide and carbon disulfide, both of which are valence isoelectronic with it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere</span> Atmospheric constituent and greenhouse gas

In Earth's atmosphere, carbon dioxide is a trace gas that plays an integral part in the greenhouse effect, carbon cycle, photosynthesis and oceanic carbon cycle. It is one of several greenhouse gases in the atmosphere of Earth. The current global average concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere is 421 ppm as of May 2022 (0.04%). This is an increase of 50% since the start of the Industrial Revolution, up from 280 ppm during the 10,000 years prior to the mid-18th century. The increase is due to human activity. Burning fossil fuels is the main cause of these increased CO2 concentrations and also the main cause of climate change. Other large sources of CO2 from human activities include cement production, deforestation, and biomass burning.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Greenhouse gas</span> Gas in an atmosphere that absorbs and emits radiation at thermal infrared wavelengths

Greenhouse gases are the gases in the atmosphere that raise the surface temperature of planets such as the Earth. What distinguishes them from other gases is that they absorb the wavelengths of radiation that a planet emits, resulting in the greenhouse effect. The Earth is warmed by sunlight, causing its surface to radiate heat, which is then mostly absorbed by greenhouse gases. Without greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, the average temperature of Earth's surface would be about −18 °C (0 °F), rather than the present average of 15 °C (59 °F).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stratospheric aerosol injection</span> Putting particles in the stratosphere to reflect sunlight to limit global heating

Stratospheric aerosol injection is a proposed method of solar geoengineering to reduce global warming. This would introduce aerosols into the stratosphere to create a cooling effect via global dimming and increased albedo, which occurs naturally from volcanic winter. It appears that stratospheric aerosol injection, at a moderate intensity, could counter most changes to temperature and precipitation, take effect rapidly, have low direct implementation costs, and be reversible in its direct climatic effects. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change concludes that it "is the most-researched [solar geoengineering] method, with high agreement that it could limit warming to below 1.5 °C (2.7 °F)." However, like other solar geoengineering approaches, stratospheric aerosol injection would do so imperfectly and other effects are possible, particularly if used in a suboptimal manner.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sodium bisulfite</span> Chemical compound

Sodium bisulfite (or sodium bisulphite, sodium hydrogen sulfite) is a chemical mixture with the approximate chemical formula NaHSO3. Sodium bisulfite in fact is not a real compound, but a mixture of salts that dissolve in water to give solutions composed of sodium and bisulfite ions. It appears in form of white or yellowish-white crystals with an odor of sulfur dioxide. Regardless of its ill-defined nature, sodium bisulfite is used in many different industries such as a food additive with E number E222 in the food industry, a reducing agent in the cosmetic industry, and a decomposer of residual hypochlorite used in the bleaching industry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Particulates</span> Microscopic solid or liquid matter suspended in the Earths atmosphere

Particulates or atmospheric particulate matter are microscopic particles of solid or liquid matter suspended in the air. The term aerosol commonly refers to the particulate/air mixture, as opposed to the particulate matter alone. Sources of particulate matter can be natural or anthropogenic. They have impacts on climate and precipitation that adversely affect human health, in ways additional to direct inhalation.

Tectonic–climatic interaction is the interrelationship between tectonic processes and the climate system. The tectonic processes in question include orogenesis, volcanism, and erosion, while relevant climatic processes include atmospheric circulation, orographic lift, monsoon circulation and the rain shadow effect. As the geological record of past climate changes over millions of years is sparse and poorly resolved, many questions remain unresolved regarding the nature of tectonic-climate interaction, although it is an area of active research by geologists and palaeoclimatologists.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sulfoxylic acid</span> Chemical compound

Sulfoxylic acid (H2SO2) (also known as hyposulfurous acid or sulfur dihydroxide) is an unstable oxoacid of sulfur in an intermediate oxidation state between hydrogen sulfide and dithionous acid. It consists of two hydroxy groups attached to a sulfur atom. Sulfoxylic acid contains sulfur in an oxidation state of +2. Sulfur monoxide (SO) can be considered as a theoretical anhydride for sulfoxylic acid, but it is not actually known to react with water.

The topic of sulfite food and beverage additives covers the application of sulfites in food chemistry. "Sulfite" is jargon that encompasses a variety of materials that are commonly used as preservatives or food additive in the production of diverse foods and beverages. Although sulfite salts are relatively nontoxic, their use has led to controversy, resulting in extensive regulations. Sulfites are a source of sulfur dioxide (SO2), a bactericide.

References

  1. ↑ Sulfur dioxide Archived 2019-12-30 at the Wayback Machine , U.S. National Library of Medicine
  2. ↑ "Sulfur Dioxide". Archived 2023-09-24 at the Wayback Machine , U.S. National Library of Medicine
  3. ↑ Lide DR, ed. (2006). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (87th ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. ISBN   0-8493-0487-3.
  4. ↑ "Hazardous Substances Data Bank".
  5. ↑ Miller J Jr, Shah P, Yaws C (1976). "Correlation constants for chemical compounds". Chemical Engineering. 83 (25): 153–180. ISSN   0009-2460.
  6. ↑ "C&L Inventory".
  7. 1 2 "Sulfur dioxide". Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health Concentrations (IDLH). National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).
  8. 1 2 3 NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. "#0575". National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).
  9. 1 2 Greenwood NN, Earnshaw A (1997). Chemistry of the Elements (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann. ISBN   978-0-08-037941-8.
  10. 1 2 Wothers P (2019). Antimony, Gold, and Jupiter's Wolf: How the Elements Were Named. Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0-19-965272-3.
  11. ↑ Cunningham, Terence P., Cooper, David L., Gerratt, Joseph, Karadakov, Peter B., Raimondi, Mario (1997). "Chemical bonding in oxofluorides of hypercoordinatesulfur". Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions. 93 (13): 2247–2254. doi:10.1039/A700708F.
  12. ↑ US EPA O (2016-05-04). "Sulfur Dioxide Trends". www.epa.gov. Retrieved 2023-02-16.
  13. ↑ Marcq E, Bertaux J, Montmessin F, Belyaev D (2012). "Variations of sulphur dioxide at the cloud top of Venus's dynamic atmosphere". Nature Geoscience. 6 (1): 25–28. Bibcode:2013NatGe...6...25M. doi:10.1038/ngeo1650. ISSN   1752-0894. S2CID   59323909.
  14. ↑ Halevy I, Zuber MT, Schrag DP (2007). "A Sulfur Dioxide Climate Feedback on Early Mars". Science. 318 (5858): 1903–1907. Bibcode:2007Sci...318.1903H. doi:10.1126/science.1147039. ISSN   0036-8075. PMID   18096802. S2CID   7246517.
  15. ↑ Lellouch E (2007). "Io's atmosphere". In Lopes, R. M. C., Spencer, J. R. (eds.). Io after Galileo. Springer-Praxis. pp. 231–264. ISBN   978-3-540-34681-4.
  16. ↑ "James Webb Space Telescope reveals an exoplanet atmosphere as never seen before".
  17. ↑ Cruikshank DP, Howell RR, Geballe TR, Fanale FP (1985). "Sulfur Dioxide Ice on IO". ICES in the Solar System. pp. 805–815. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-5418-2_55. ISBN   978-94-010-8891-6.
  18. ↑ Europa's Hidden Ice Chemistry – NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Jpl.nasa.gov (2010-10-04). Retrieved on 2013-09-24.
  19. 1 2 3 Müller, Hermann. "Sulfur Dioxide". Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry . Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. doi:10.1002/14356007.a25_569. ISBN   978-3527306732.
  20. ↑ Shriver, Atkins. Inorganic Chemistry, Fifth Edition. W. H. Freeman and Company; New York, 2010; p. 414.
  21. ↑ WHITEHAVEN COAST ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY. lakestay.co.uk (2007)
  22. ↑ "Information archivée dans le Web" (PDF).
  23. ↑ Zamboni CB, Medeiros IM, de Medeiros JA (October 2011). Analysis of Sulfur in Dried Fruits Using NAA (PDF). 2011 International Nuclear Atlantic Conference - INAC 2011. ISBN   978-85-99141-03-8. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2020-06-04. Retrieved 2020-06-04.
  24. ↑ Current EU approved additives and their E Numbers, The Food Standards Agency website.
  25. 1 2 Preserving foods: Drying fruits and Vegetable (PDF), University of Georgia cooperative extension service, archived from the original (PDF) on 2022-09-27, retrieved 2022-06-06
  26. ↑ "Practical Winery & vineyard Journal Jan/Feb 2009". www.practicalwinery.com. 1 Feb 2009. Archived from the original on 2013-09-28.
  27. ↑ Sulphites in wine, MoreThanOrganic.com.
  28. ↑ Jackson, R.S. (2008) Wine science: principles and applications, Amsterdam; Boston: Elsevier/Academic Press
  29. ↑ Guerrero RF, Cantos-Villar E (2015). "Demonstrating the efficiency of sulphur dioxide replacements in wine: A parameter review". Trends in Food Science & Technology. 42: 27–43. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2014.11.004.
  30. ↑ Chlorine Use in the Winery. Purdue University
  31. ↑ Use of ozone for winery and environmental sanitation Archived 2017-09-12 at the Wayback Machine , Practical Winery & Vineyard Journal.
  32. ↑ Tchobanoglous G (1979). Wastewater Engineering (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill. ISBN   0-07-041677-X.
  33. ↑ Engelmann L (July 2018). "Fumigating the Hygienic Model City: Bubonic Plague and the Sulfurozador in Early-Twentieth-Century Buenos Aires". Medical History. 62 (3): 360–382. doi:10.1017/mdh.2018.37. PMC   6113751 . PMID   29886876.
  34. ↑ Liu D, Jin H, Tang C, Du J (2010). "Sulfur Dioxide: a Novel Gaseous Signal in the Regulation of Cardiovascular Functions". Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry. 10 (11): 1039–1045. doi:10.2174/1389557511009011039. PMID   20540708.
  35. ↑ Tian H (5 November 2014). "Advances in the study on endogenous sulfur dioxide in the cardiovascular system". Chinese Medical Journal. 127 (21): 3803–3807. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20133031 . PMID   25382339. S2CID   11924999.
  36. ↑ Yang R, Yang Y, Dong X, Wu X, Wei Y (Aug 2014). "Correlation between endogenous sulfur dioxide and homocysteine in children with pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with congenital heart disease". Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi (in Chinese). 52 (8): 625–629. PMID   25224243.
  37. ↑ Liu D, Huang Y, Bu D, Liu AD, Holmberg L, Jia Y, Tang C, Du J, Jin H (May 2014). "Sulfur dioxide inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation via suppressing the Erk/MAP kinase pathway mediated by cAMP/PKA signaling". Cell Death Dis. 5 (5): e1251. doi:10.1038/cddis.2014.229. PMC   4047873 . PMID   24853429.
  38. ↑ Wang XB, Jin HF, Tang CS, Du JB (16 Nov 2011). "The biological effect of endogenous sulfur dioxide in the cardiovascular system". Eur J Pharmacol. 670 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2011.08.031. PMID   21925165.
  39. ↑ Liang Y, Liu D, Ochs T, Tang C, Chen S, Zhang S, Geng B, Jin H, Du J (Jan 2011). "Endogenous sulfur dioxide protects against isoproterenol-induced myocardial injury and increases myocardial antioxidant capacity in rats". Lab. Invest. 91 (1): 12–23. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2010.156 . PMID   20733562.
  40. ↑ Hoffman, R. V. (1990). "m-Trifluoromethylbenzenesulfonyl Chloride". Organic Syntheses ; Collected Volumes, vol. 7, p. 508.
  41. ↑ Olah GA, Lukas J (1967-08-01). "Stable carbonium ions. XLVII. Alkylcarbonium ion formation from alkanes via hydride (alkide) ion abstraction in fluorosulfonic acid-antimony pentafluoride-sulfuryl chlorofluoride solution". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 89 (18): 4739–4744. doi:10.1021/ja00994a030. ISSN   0002-7863.
  42. ↑ "Center for Science in the Public Interest – Chemical Cuisine" . Retrieved March 17, 2010.
  43. ↑ "California Department of Public Health: Food and Drug Branch: Sulfites" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 23, 2012. Retrieved September 27, 2013.
  44. ↑ Vally H, Misso NL (2012). "Adverse reactions to the sulphite additives". Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 5 (1): 16–23. PMC   4017440 . PMID   24834193.
  45. ↑ Sulfur Dioxide Basics U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  46. 1 2 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Pollution. United States Environmental Protection Agency
  47. ↑ "NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards".
  48. ↑ "Volcanic Sulfur Aerosols Affect Climate and the Earth's Ozone Layer". United States Geological Survey. Archived from the original on 14 November 2015. Retrieved 17 February 2009.
  49. ↑ Mathera TA, Oppenheimer AG, McGonigle A (2004). "Aerosol chemistry of emissions from three contrasting volcanoes in Italy". Atmospheric Environment. 38 (33): 5637–5649. Bibcode:2004AtmEn..38.5637M. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.06.017.
  50. ↑ IPCC, 1990: Chapter 1: Greenhouse Gases and Aerosols [R.T. Watson, H. Rodhe, H. Oeschger and U. Siegenthaler]. In: Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment [J.T.Houghton, G.J.Jenkins and J.J.Ephraums (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 31–34,
  51. 1 2 Effects of Acid Rain – Human Health Archived January 18, 2008, at the Wayback Machine . Epa.gov (June 2, 2006). Retrieved on 2013-02-09.
  52. ↑ Henneman L, Choirat C, Dedoussi I, Dominici F, Roberts J, Zigler C (24 November 2023). "Mortality risk from United States coal electricity generation". Science . 382 (6673): 941.
  53. ↑ Bates TS, Lamb BK, Guenther A, Dignon J, Stoiber RE (April 1992). "Sulfur emissions to the atmosphere from natural sources". Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry. 14 (1–4): 315–337. Bibcode:1992JAtC...14..315B. doi:10.1007/BF00115242. ISSN   0167-7764. S2CID   55497518.
  54. ↑ Burns DA, Aherne J, Gay DA, Lehmann CM (2016). "Acid rain and its environmental effects: Recent scientific advances". Atmospheric Environment. 146: 1–4. Bibcode:2016AtmEn.146....1B. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.10.019 .
  55. ↑ "Effects of Acid Rain - Surface Waters and Aquatic Animals". US EPA. Archived from the original on 14 May 2009.
  56. ↑ Rodhe H, Dentener F, Schulz M (2002-10-01). "The Global Distribution of Acidifying Wet Deposition". Environmental Science & Technology. 36 (20): 4382–4388. Bibcode:2002EnST...36.4382R. doi:10.1021/es020057g. ISSN   0013-936X. PMID   12387412.
  57. ↑ US EPA: Effects of Acid Rain – Forests Archived July 26, 2008, at the Wayback Machine
  58. ↑ Likens GE, Driscoll CT, Buso DC (1996). "Long-Term Effects of Acid Rain: Response and Recovery of a Forest Ecosystem" (PDF). Science. 272 (5259): 244. Bibcode:1996Sci...272..244L. doi:10.1126/science.272.5259.244. S2CID   178546205. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 24, 2012. Retrieved February 9, 2013.
  59. ↑ Larssen T, Carmichael GR (2000-10-01). "Acid rain and acidification in China: the importance of base cation deposition". Environmental Pollution. 110 (1): 89–102. doi:10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00279-1. ISSN   0269-7491. PMID   15092859. Archived from the original on March 30, 2015. Retrieved April 22, 2020.
  60. ↑ Johnson DW, Turner J, Kelly JM (1982). "The effects of acid rain on forest nutrient status". Water Resources Research. 18 (3): 449–461. Bibcode:1982WRR....18..449J. doi:10.1029/WR018i003p00449. ISSN   1944-7973.
  61. ↑ Wang X, Ding H, Ryan L, Xu X (1 May 1997). "Association between air pollution and low birth weight: a community-based study". Environmental Health Perspectives. 105 (5): 514–20. doi:10.1289/ehp.97105514. ISSN   0091-6765. PMC   1469882 . PMID   9222137. S2CID   2707126.
  62. ↑ Xu Y, Ramanathan V, Victor DG (5 December 2018). "Global warming will happen faster than we think". Nature. 564 (7734): 30–32. Bibcode:2018Natur.564...30X. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-07586-5 . PMID   30518902.
  63. ↑ Lin C, Lin R, Chen P, Wang P, De Marcellis-Warin N, Zigler C, Christiani DC (2018-02-08). "A Global Perspective on Sulfur Oxide Controls in Coal-Fired Power Plants and Cardiovascular Disease". Scientific Reports. 8 (1): 2611. Bibcode:2018NatSR...8.2611L. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-20404-2. ISSN   2045-2322. PMC   5805744 . PMID   29422539.
  64. ↑ Lindeburg MR (2006). Mechanical Engineering Reference Manual for the PE Exam. Belmont, C.A.: Professional Publications, Inc. pp. 27–3. ISBN   978-1-59126-049-3.
  65. ↑ FAQ's About Sulfur Removal and Recovery using the LO-CAT® Hydrogen Sulfide Removal System. gtp-merichem.com
  66. ↑ Process screening analysis of alternative gas treating and sulfur removal for gasification. (December 2002) Report by SFA Pacific, Inc. prepared for U.S. Department of Energy (PDF) Retrieved on 2011-10-31.
  67. ↑ May, Walter R. Marine Emissions Abatement Archived 2015-04-02 at the Wayback Machine . SFA International, Inc., p. 6.
  68. 1 2 3 4 Julsrud IR, Storelvmo T, Schulz M, Moseid KO, Wild M (20 October 2022). "Disentangling Aerosol and Cloud Effects on Dimming and Brightening in Observations and CMIP6". Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 127 (21): e2021JD035476. Bibcode:2022JGRD..12735476J. doi: 10.1029/2021JD035476 .
  69. ↑ Stanhill G, Moreshet S (6 November 2004). "Global radiation climate changes in Israel". Climatic Change . 22 (2): 121–138. Bibcode:1992ClCh...22..121S. doi:10.1007/BF00142962. S2CID   154006620.
  70. ↑ Gilgen H, Wild M, Ohmura A (1998). "Means and trends of shortwave irradiance at the surface estimated from global energy balance archive data" (PDF). Journal of Climate . 11 (8): 2042–2061. Bibcode:1998JCli...11.2042G. doi: 10.1175/1520-0442-11.8.2042 .
  71. ↑ Stanhill G, Cohen S (2001). "Global dimming: a review of the evidence for a widespread and significant reduction in global radiation with discussion of its probable causes and possible agricultural consequences". Agricultural and Forest Meteorology . 107 (4): 255–278. Bibcode:2001AgFM..107..255S. doi:10.1016/S0168-1923(00)00241-0.
  72. ↑ Liepert BG (2 May 2002). "Observed Reductions in Surface Solar Radiation in the United States and Worldwide from 1961 to 1990" (PDF). Geophysical Research Letters . 29 (12): 61–1–61–4. Bibcode:2002GeoRL..29.1421L. doi: 10.1029/2002GL014910 .
  73. ↑ Eddy JA, Gilliland RL, Hoyt DV (23 December 1982). "Changes in the solar constant and climatic effects". Nature . 300 (5894): 689–693. Bibcode:1982Natur.300..689E. doi:10.1038/300689a0. S2CID   4320853. Spacecraft measurements have established that the total radiative output of the Sun varies at the 0.1−0.3% level
  74. 1 2 "Aerosol pollution has caused decades of global dimming". American Geophysical Union . 18 February 2021. Archived from the original on 27 March 2023. Retrieved 18 December 2023.
  75. ↑ Adam D (18 December 2003). "Goodbye sunshine". The Guardian. Retrieved 26 August 2009.
  76. ↑ Wild M, Wacker S, Yang S, Sanchez-Lorenzo A (1 February 2021). "Evidence for Clear-Sky Dimming and Brightening in Central Europe". Geophysical Research Letters. 48 (6). Bibcode:2021GeoRL..4892216W. doi:10.1029/2020GL092216. hdl:20.500.11850/477374. S2CID   233645438.
  77. ↑ Xie X, Myhre G, Shindell D, Faluvegi G, Takemura T, Voulgarakis A, Shi Z, Li X, Xie X, Liu H, Liu X, Liu Y (27 December 2022). "Anthropogenic sulfate aerosol pollution in South and East Asia induces increased summer precipitation over arid Central Asia". Communications Earth & Environment. 3 (1): 328. Bibcode:2022ComEE...3..328X. doi:10.1038/s43247-022-00660-x. PMC   9792934 . PMID   36588543.
  78. ↑ Pan B, Wang Y, Hu J, Lin Y, Hsieh J, Logan T, Feng X, Jiang JH, Yung YL, Zhang R (2018). "Sahara dust may make you cough, but it's a storm killer". Journal of Climate. 31 (18): 7621–7644. doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0776.1 .
  79. ↑ Cat Lazaroff (7 December 2001). "Aerosol Pollution Could Drain Earth's Water Cycle". Environment News Service. Archived from the original on 2016-06-03. Retrieved 2007-03-24.
  80. ↑ Kostel, Ken, Oh, Clare (14 April 2006). "Could Reducing Global Dimming Mean a Hotter, Dryer World?". Lamont–Doherty Earth Observatory News. Archived from the original on 2016-03-03. Retrieved 2006-06-12.
  81. ↑ Chang C, Chiang JC, Wehner MF, Friedman AR, Ruedy R (15 May 2011). "Sulfate Aerosol Control of Tropical Atlantic Climate over the Twentieth Century". Journal of Climate. 24 (10): 2540–2555. Bibcode:2011JCli...24.2540C. doi: 10.1175/2010JCLI4065.1 .
  82. ↑ Peace AH, Booth BB, Regayre LA, Carslaw KS, Sexton DM, Bonfils CJ, Rostron JW (26 August 2022). "Evaluating uncertainty in aerosol forcing of tropical precipitation shifts". Earth System Dynamics. 13 (3): 1215–1232. Bibcode:2022ESD....13.1215P. doi: 10.5194/esd-13-1215-2022 .
  83. ↑ Allen RJ (20 August 2015). "A 21st century northward tropical precipitation shift caused by future anthropogenic aerosol reductions". Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 120 (18): 9087–9102. Bibcode:2015JGRD..120.9087A. doi: 10.1002/2015JD023623 .
  84. ↑ "Aerosols and Incoming Sunlight (Direct Effects)". NASA. 2 November 2010.
  85. ↑ Gillett NP, Kirchmeier-Young M, Ribes A, Shiogama H, Hegerl GC, Knutti R, Gastineau G, John JG, Li L, Nazarenko L, Rosenbloom N, Seland Ø, Wu T, Yukimoto S, Ziehn T (18 January 2021). "Constraining human contributions to observed warming since the pre-industrial period" (PDF). Nature Climate Change. 11 (3): 207–212. Bibcode:2021NatCC..11..207G. doi:10.1038/s41558-020-00965-9. S2CID   231670652.
  86. ↑ IPCC, 2021: Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 3–32, doi:10.1017/9781009157896.001.
  87. ↑ Quaas J, Jia H, Smith C, Albright AL, Aas W, Bellouin N, Boucher O, Doutriaux-Boucher M, Forster PM, Grosvenor D, Jenkins S, Klimont Z, Loeb NG, Ma X, Naik V, Paulot F, Stier P, Wild M, Myhre G, Schulz M (21 September 2022). "Robust evidence for reversal of the trend in aerosol effective climate forcing". Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 22 (18): 12221–12239. Bibcode:2022ACP....2212221Q. doi: 10.5194/acp-22-12221-2022 . hdl: 20.500.11850/572791 . S2CID   252446168.
  88. ↑ Andrew T (27 September 2019). "Behind the Forecast: How clouds affect temperatures". Science Behind the Forecast. LOUISVILLE, Ky. (WAVE). Retrieved 4 January 2023.
  89. ↑ Zhang J, Furtado K, Turnock ST, Mulcahy JP, Wilcox LJ, Booth BB, Sexton D, Wu T, Zhang F, Liu Q (22 December 2021). "The role of anthropogenic aerosols in the anomalous cooling from 1960 to 1990 in the CMIP6 Earth system models". Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 21 (4): 18609–18627. Bibcode:2021ACP....2118609Z. doi: 10.5194/acp-21-18609-2021 .
  90. ↑ Persad GG, Samset BH, Wilcox LJ (21 November 2022). "Aerosols must be included in climate risk assessments". Nature. 611 (7937): 662–664. Bibcode:2022Natur.611..662P. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-03763-9 . PMID   36411334.
  91. ↑ Li Y, Wang Z, Lei Y, Che H, Zhang X (23 February 2023). "Impacts of reductions in non-methane short-lived climate forcers on future climate extremes and the resulting population exposure risks in eastern and southern Asia". Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 23 (4): 2499–2523. Bibcode:2023ACP....23.2499L. doi: 10.5194/acp-23-2499-2023 . S2CID   257180147.
  92. ↑ Luo F, Wilcox L, Dong B, Su Q, Chen W, Dunstone N, Li S, Gao Y (19 February 2020). "Projected near-term changes of temperature extremes in Europe and China under different aerosol emissions". Environmental Research Letters. 15 (3): 4013. Bibcode:2020ERL....15c4013L. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab6b34 .
  93. ↑ Wang Z, Lin L, Xu Y, Che H, Zhang X, Zhang H, Dong W, Wang C, Gui K, Xie B (12 January 2021). "Incorrect Asian aerosols affecting the attribution and projection of regional climate change in CMIP6 models". npj Climate and Atmospheric Science. 4. Bibcode:2022JGRD..12735476J. doi: 10.1029/2021JD035476 .
  94. ↑ Ramachandran S, Rupakheti M, Cherian R (10 February 2022). "Insights into recent aerosol trends over Asia from observations and CMIP6 simulations". Science of the Total Environment. 807 (1): 150756. Bibcode:2022ScTEn.807o0756R. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150756 . PMID   34619211. S2CID   238474883.
  95. ↑ Kobayashi Y, Ide Y, Takegawa N (2021-04-03). "Development of a novel particle mass spectrometer for online measurements of refractory sulfate aerosols". Aerosol Science and Technology. 55 (4): 371–386. Bibcode:2021AerST..55..371K. doi:10.1080/02786826.2020.1852168. ISSN   0278-6826. S2CID   229506768.
  96. ↑ Palumbo, P., A. Rotundi, V. Della Corte, A. Ciucci, L. Colangeli, F. Esposito, E. Mazzotta Epifani, V. Mennella , J.R. Brucato, F.J.M. Rietmeijer, G. J. Flynn, J.-B. Renard, J.R. Stephens, and E. Zona. "The DUSTER experiment: collection and analysis of aerosol in the high stratosphere" . Retrieved 19 February 2009.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)[ permanent dead link ]
  97. ↑ Myhre G, Stordal F, Berglen TF, Sundet JK, Isaksen IS (2004-03-01). "Uncertainties in the Radiative Forcing Due to Sulfate Aerosols". Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences. 61 (5): 485–498. Bibcode:2004JAtS...61..485M. doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<0485:UITRFD>2.0.CO;2 . ISSN   0022-4928. S2CID   55623817.
  98. ↑ Zhang J, Furtado K, Turnock ST, Mulcahy JP, Wilcox LJ, Booth BB, Sexton D, Wu T, Zhang F, Liu Q (22 December 2021). "The role of anthropogenic aerosols in the anomalous cooling from 1960 to 1990 in the CMIP6 Earth system models". Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 21 (4): 18609–18627. Bibcode:2021ACP....2118609Z. doi: 10.5194/acp-21-18609-2021 .
  99. ↑ "Aerosols and Incoming Sunlight (Direct Effects)". NASA. 2 November 2010.
  100. ↑ "Stratospheric Injections Could Help Cool Earth, Computer Model Shows". ScienceDaily. 15 September 2006. Retrieved 19 February 2009.
  101. ↑ Launder B., J.M.T. Thompson (1996). "Global and Arctic climate engineering: numerical model studies". Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 366 (1882): 4039–56. Bibcode:2008RSPTA.366.4039C. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0132 . PMID   18757275.
  102. ↑ Crutzen PJ (2006). "Albedo Enhancement by Stratospheric Sulfur Injections: A Contribution to Resolve a Policy Dilemma?". Climatic Change. 77 (3–4): 211–220. Bibcode:2006ClCh...77..211C. doi: 10.1007/s10584-006-9101-y .
  103. ↑ Visioni D, Slessarev E, MacMartin DG, Mahowald NM, Goodale CL, Xia L (1 September 2020). "What goes up must come down: impacts of deposition in a sulfate geoengineering scenario". Environmental Research Letters. 15 (9): 094063. Bibcode:2020ERL....15i4063V. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab94eb . ISSN   1748-9326.
  104. ↑ Andrew Charlton-Perez, Eleanor Highwood. "Costs and benefits of geo-engineering in the Stratosphere" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 January 2017. Retrieved 17 February 2009.
  105. ↑ Trisos CH, Geden O, Seneviratne SI, Sugiyama M, van Aalst M, Bala G, Mach KJ, Ginzburg V, de Coninck H, Patt A (2021). "Cross-Working Group Box SRM: Solar Radiation Modification" (PDF). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2021: 1238. Bibcode:2021AGUFM.U13B..05K. doi:10.1017/9781009157896.007.
  106. ↑ Holman JP (2002). Heat Transfer (9th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. pp. 600–606. ISBN   9780072406559.
  107. ↑ Incropera rP, Dewitt DP, Bergman TL, Lavigne AS (2007). Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. pp. 941–950. ISBN   9780471457282.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.