ECW model

Last updated • 7 min readFrom Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia

In chemistry, the ECW model is a semi-quantitative model that describes and predicts the strength of Lewis acidLewis base interactions. Many chemical reactions can be described as acid–base reactions, so models for such interactions are of potentially broad interest. The model initially assigned E and C parameters to each and every acid and base. The model was later expanded to the ECW model to cover reactions that have a constant energy term, W, which describes processes that precede the acid–base reaction. This quantitative model is often discussed with the qualitative HSAB theory, which also seeks to rationalize the behavior of diverse acids and bases.

Contents

History of the problem

As early as 1938, G. N. Lewis pointed out that the relative strength of an acid or base depended upon the base or acid against which it was measured. [1] No single rank order of acid or base strength can predict the energetics of the cross reaction. Consider the following pair of acid–base reactions:.

4F-C6H4OH + OEt2 −ΔH = 5.94 kcal/mole
4F-C6H4OH + SMe2 −ΔH = 4.73 kcal/mole

These data suggest that OEt2 is a stronger base than SMe2. The opposite is found, however, when I2 is the acid:

I2 + OEt2 −ΔH = 4.16 kcal/mole
I2 + SMe2 −ΔH = 7.63 kcal/mole

E and C equation

The E-C model accommodates the failure of single parameter descriptions of acids and bases. In 1965 Russell S. Drago and Bradford Wayland published the two term equation such that each acid and each base is described by two parameters. [2] Each acid is characterized by an EA and a CA. Each base is likewise characterized by its own EB and CB. The E and C parameters refer, respectively, to the electrostatic and covalent contributions to the strength of the bonds that the acid and base will form. These parameters have been empirically obtained by using enthalpies for adducts that form only σ bonds between the acid and base as well as adducts that have no steric repulsion between the acid and base.

This equation reproduces and predicts the enthalpy, ΔH, of a reaction between many acids and bases. ΔH is a measure of strength of the bond between the acid and the base, both in the gas phase and in weakly solvating media. Entropy effects are ignored. A matrix presentation of the equation enhances its utility. [3]

Four values, two E and two C were assigned as references. EA and CA of I2 were chosen as standards. Since I2 has little tendency to undergo electrostatic bonding, the EA parameter was assigned a small value, 0.5, while the value of CA for the covalent property was set at 2.0. For the two base parameters, EB for CH3C(O)N(CH3)2 (DMA) was set at 2.35 and CB for (C2H5)2S, diethyl sulfide, was set at 3.92. Fixing the parameters in this way imposed the covalent-electrostatic model on the data set by fixing the EAEB and CACB products of the DMA and (C2H5)2S adducts with iodine, and these four values ensured that none of the parameters had negative values. Due to increasing enthalpy data that became available since the EC equation was first proposed the parameters have been improved. Mixing E and C numbers from the improved set of parameters with older parameters will result in incorrect calculations and is to be avoided. [4] A select set of the improved E and C numbers is found in this article and the complete set is available in the literature. [5] [6] EB and CB parameters for phosphines that can be used in combination with the improved parameters for oxygen, nitrogen, and sulfur donors to measure σ-basicity have been reported. [7]

ECW model

In the ECW model, a new term W was added to the equation.

The W term represents a constant energy for cleavage of a dimeric acid or base. For example, the enthalpy of cleavage the [Rh(CO)2Cl]2 by base B involves two steps. The first step is cleavage of the dimer, which is W:

1/2 [Rh(CO)2Cl]2 → Rh(CO)2Cl  W = −10.39 kcal/mol

The second step is the binding of B to RhCl(CO)2 monomer. In this case, W = −10.39 kcal/mol.

In other cases, W is the enthalpy needed to cleave the internal hydrogen bonding of the H-bonding acid (CF3)3COH. W is also useful for a base displacement reaction in poorly solvating media:

F3B-OEt2 → BF3 + OEt2

For any base, a constant energy contribution is observed for the breaking of the F3B-OEt2 bond. An ECW study of the enthalpies of a series of bases produces a W value that corresponds to the enthalpy of dissociation of the F3B-OEt2 bond. The EA and CA parameters that result are those for uncomplexed BF3.

A graphical presentation of the ECW model

A graphical presentation of this model clearly shows that there is no single rank order of acid or base strength, a point often overlooked, and emphasizes that the magnitude of acid and base interactions requires two parameters (E & C) to account for the interactions. [8]

The EC equation from the ECW Model

can be rearranged into a form which can be plotted as a straight line.

C-B plot using only three Lewis bases to show this graphical approach. ECW Model Graph.png
C-B plot using only three Lewis bases to show this graphical approach.

In a Cramer–Bopp plot for Lewis bases, the parameter Ra [lower-alpha 1] reflects the mode of bonding of a potential Lewis acid partner, from purely electrostatic interactions (Ra = −1) to purely covalent interactions (Ra = +1). The parameter reflects the strength of the bonding interaction. The plot shown here allows comparison of three chosen Lewis bases: acetonitrile, ammonia, and dimethyl sulfide. The Lewis acid iodine (Ra = 0.6) will interact most strongly with dimethyl sulfide and least strongly with acetonitrile, whereas triethylgallium (Ra = −0.65) will interact most strongly with ammonia and least strongly with dimethyl sulfide. The plot also shows that ammonia is a stronger Lewis base than acetonitrile irrespective of its Lewis acid partner, whereas the relative strengths of ammonia and dimethyl sulfide as Lewis bases depends on the bonding characteristics of the Lewis acid, swapping order when Ra = 0.1. (NB: guesstimate).[ clarification needed ] The Cramer–Bopp plot was developed as a visual tool for comparing Lewis base strength with the range of possible Lewis acid partners, and a similar plot can be constructed to examine selected Lewis acids against the range of possible Lewis bases. References 5, 8, 12, and 14 contain graphical presentations that define the ranking order of strength of many Lewis acids and bases.

Other aspects and extensions of the ECW model

As mentioned above the E and C parameters are obtained from enthalpies of adduct formation in which the bond between the acid and base is a σ interaction and adducts that have no steric repulsion between the acid and base. As a result, E and C parameters can be used to glean information about pi bonding. When pi bonding contributes to the measured enthalpy, the enthalpy calculated from the E and C parameters will be less than the measured enthalpy and the difference provides a measure of the extent of the pi bonding contribution. [9] [10]

The ᐃH calculated for the reaction of Me3B with Me3N is larger than the observed. This discrepancy is attributed to steric repulsion between the methyl groups on the B and N. The difference between the calculated and observed values can then be taken as the amount of the steric effect, a value otherwise not attainable. Steric effects have also been identified with (CH3)3SnCl and with Cu(HFacac)2.

The use of E and C parameters have been extended to analyze spectroscopic changes occurring during adduct formation. [11] For example, the shift of the phenol OH stretching frequency, Δχ, that occurs upon adduct formation has been analyzed using the following equation:

Δχ = ΕAEB + CACB + W

where asterisks on the EA and CA for phenol indicate that the acceptor is held constant and the frequency shift is measured as the base is varied. The asterisks also indicate that the phenol parameters are those for frequency shifts and not those for enthalpies. An analysis like this provides a basis for using EB and CB parameters as a reference scale of donor strengths for frequency shifts. This type analysis has also been applied to other spectroscopic shifts (NMR, EPR, UV-vis, IR, etc.) accompanying adduct formation. Any physicochemical property, Δχ, that is dominated by σ donor-acceptor interaction can be correlated with the enthalpy-derived E and C parameters.

The ECW equations enables one to correlate and predict the enthalpies of adduct formation of neutral donor-acceptor interactions for which the electron-transfer is limited. For gas-phase reactions between cations and neutral donors, there is significant electron-transfer. The extension of the ECW model to cation-neutral Lewis base interactions has led to the ECT model. [12] [13] Others have concluded that the ECW model "is generally found helpful in many fields of solution chemistry and biochemistry". [14]

Selected E and C parameters for acids [lower-alpha 2]
AcidEACAWCA/EA
I2 0.502.004.0
IBr 1.203.2902.7
ICl 2.921.6600.57
C6H5OH 2.271.0700.47
4-FC6H4OH2.301.1100.48
3-CF3C6H4OH2.381.2200.51
4-CH3C6H4OH 2.231.0300.44
CF3CH2OH 2.071.0600.51
(CF3)2CHOH 2.891.33−0.160.46
(CH3)3COH 1.070.6900.65
(CF3)3COH 3.061.88−0.870.61
C8H17OH 0.850.8701.0
HCCl3 1.560.4400.28
CH2Cl2 0.860.1100.13
C4H4NH 1.380.6800.49
HNCO 1.600.6900.43
HNCS 2.850.7000.25
B(CH3)3 2.903.6001.2
Al(CH3)3 8.663.6800.43
Ga(C2H5)3 6.951.4800.21
In(CH3)3 6.602.1500.33
(CH3)3SnCl 2.870.7100.25
SO2 0.511.5603.1
SbCl5 3.6410.4202.9
Cu(HFacac)2 [lower-alpha 3] 1.822.8601.6
Zn[N(Si(CH3)3]2 2.752.3200.84
Cd[N(Si(CH3)3]2 2.501.8300.73
ZnTPP [lower-alpha 4] 2.721.4500.53
CoPPIXDME [lower-alpha 5] 2.321.3400.58
1/2[MeCo(Hdmg)2]2 [lower-alpha 6] 4.703.24−5.840.60
1/2 [Rh(CO)2Cl]2 4.324.13−10.390.96
1/2 [Rh(COD)2Cl]2 2.432.56−5.781.1
1/2 [Pd(π-ally)Cl]2 1.702.14−3.381.3
[Ni(TFAcCAM)2]2 [lower-alpha 7] 1.551.3200.85
Mo2PFB4 [lower-alpha 8] 3.151.0500.33
and for bases [lower-alpha 9]
BaseEBCBCB/EB
NH3 2.312.040.88
NH2(CH3) 2.163.131.4
NH(CH3)2 1.804.212.3
N(CH3)3 1.215.614.6
HC(C2H4)3N 0.806.728.4
(C2H5)3N 1.325.734.3
1-CH3NC3N [lower-alpha 10] 1.164.924.2
C5H5N 1.783.542.0
3CH3C5H4N 1.813.672.0
3BrC5H4N 1.663.081.9
4CH3OC5H4N 1.833.832.1
CH3CN 1.640.710.43
(CH3)2NCN1.920.920.48
ClCH2CN 1.670.330.20
CH3C(O)CH3 1.741.260.72
(CH2)4CO 2.020.880.43
CH3C(O)OC2H5 1.620.980.61
CH3C(O)N(CH3)2 2.351.310.56
(C2H5)2O 1.801.630.91
(CH2)4O 1.642.181.3
O(C2H4)2)O 1.861.290.69
(CH2)4(CH)2)O [lower-alpha 11] 1.452.141.5
(CH3)2S 0.253.7515
(CH2)4S 0.264.0716
(C2H5)2S 0.243.9216
(CH3)2SO 2.401.470.61
(CH2)4SO 2.441.640.67
C5H5NO 2.292.331.0
4CH3OC5H4NO2.343.021,3
(C6H5)3PO 2.591.670.64
(CH3)3P 0.255.8124
(CH3O)3P 0.134.8337
(CH3)2Se 0.054.2483
(C6H5)3PS 0.353.6510
C6H6 0.700.450.64

Charge-transfer complexes of I2

The enthalpies of formation of some Donor-I2 adducts are listed below. I2 is a Lewis acid classified as a soft acid and its acceptor properties are discussed in the ECW model. The relative acceptor strength of I2 toward a series of bases, versus other Lewis acids, can be illustrated by C-B plots. [15]

Enthalpies of formation of some donor-I2 adducts
Base−ΔH (kcal/mol)
Benzene1.4
Toluene1.8
Dioxane3.5
Diethyl ether4.3
Diethyl sulfide8.3
Dimethylacetamide4.7
Acetonitrile1.9
Pyridine7.80
Triethylamine12.0

See also

Notes

  1. (CAEA)/(CA + EA)
  2. units for EA, and CA are (kcal/mol)12 and W is kcal/mol
  3. bis(hexafloroacetylacetonato)copper(II)
  4. zinc tetraphenylporphine
  5. cobalt(II) protoporhyrin IX dimethyl ester IX
  6. methylcobaloxime
  7. bis(3-trifluoro-d-camphorate)nickel(II) dimer
  8. molybdenum perfluorobutyrate
  9. Units for EB and CB are (kcal/mol) 12
  10. N-methylimidazole
  11. 7-Oxabicyclo[2.2.1]heptane

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Acid</span> Chemical compound giving a proton or accepting an electron pair

An acid is a molecule or ion capable of either donating a proton (i.e. hydrogen ion, H+), known as a Brønsted–Lowry acid, or forming a covalent bond with an electron pair, known as a Lewis acid.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Acid–base reaction</span> Chemical reaction between an acid and a base

In chemistry, an acid–base reaction is a chemical reaction that occurs between an acid and a base. It can be used to determine pH via titration. Several theoretical frameworks provide alternative conceptions of the reaction mechanisms and their application in solving related problems; these are called the acid–base theories, for example, Brønsted–Lowry acid–base theory.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hydrogen bond</span> Intermolecular attraction between a hydrogen-donor pair and an acceptor

In chemistry, a hydrogen bond is primarily an electrostatic force of attraction between a hydrogen (H) atom which is covalently bonded to a more electronegative "donor" atom or group (Dn), and another electronegative atom bearing a lone pair of electrons—the hydrogen bond acceptor (Ac). Such an interacting system is generally denoted Dn−H···Ac, where the solid line denotes a polar covalent bond, and the dotted or dashed line indicates the hydrogen bond. The most frequent donor and acceptor atoms are the period 2 elements nitrogen (N), oxygen (O), and fluorine (F).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Activation energy</span> Minimum amount of energy that must be provided for a system to undergo a reaction or process

In the Arrhenius model of reaction rates, activation energy is the minimum amount of energy that must be available to reactants for a chemical reaction to occur. The activation energy (Ea) of a reaction is measured in kilojoules per mole (kJ/mol) or kilocalories per mole (kcal/mol). Activation energy can be thought of as the magnitude of the potential barrier (sometimes called the energy barrier) separating minima of the potential energy surface pertaining to the initial and final thermodynamic state. For a chemical reaction to proceed at a reasonable rate, the temperature of the system should be high enough such that there exists an appreciable number of molecules with translational energy equal to or greater than the activation energy. The term "activation energy" was introduced in 1889 by the Swedish scientist Svante Arrhenius.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lewis acids and bases</span> Chemical bond theory

A Lewis acid (named for the American physical chemist Gilbert N. Lewis) is a chemical species that contains an empty orbital which is capable of accepting an electron pair from a Lewis base to form a Lewis adduct. A Lewis base, then, is any species that has a filled orbital containing an electron pair which is not involved in bonding but may form a dative bond with a Lewis acid to form a Lewis adduct. For example, NH3 is a Lewis base, because it can donate its lone pair of electrons. Trimethylborane () is a Lewis acid as it is capable of accepting a lone pair. In a Lewis adduct, the Lewis acid and base share an electron pair furnished by the Lewis base, forming a dative bond. In the context of a specific chemical reaction between NH3 and Me3B, a lone pair from NH3 will form a dative bond with the empty orbital of Me3B to form an adduct NH3•BMe3. The terminology refers to the contributions of Gilbert N. Lewis.

HSAB is an acronym for "hard and soft (Lewis) acids and bases". HSAB is widely used in chemistry for explaining the stability of compounds, reaction mechanisms and pathways. It assigns the terms 'hard' or 'soft', and 'acid' or 'base' to chemical species. 'Hard' applies to species which are small, have high charge states, and are weakly polarizable. 'Soft' applies to species which are big, have low charge states and are strongly polarizable.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charge-transfer complex</span> Association of molecules in which a fraction of electronic charge is transferred between them

In chemistry, charge-transfer (CT) complex, or electron donor-acceptor complex, describes a type of supramolecular assembly of two or more molecules or ions. The assembly consists of two molecules that self-attract through electrostatic forces, i.e., one has at least partial negative charge and the partner has partial positive charge, referred to respectively as the electron acceptor and electron donor. In some cases, the degree of charge transfer is "complete", such that the CT complex can be classified as a salt. In other cases, the charge-transfer association is weak, and the interaction can be disrupted easily by polar solvents.

The bond-dissociation energy is one measure of the strength of a chemical bond A−B. It can be defined as the standard enthalpy change when A−B is cleaved by homolysis to give fragments A and B, which are usually radical species. The enthalpy change is temperature-dependent, and the bond-dissociation energy is often defined to be the enthalpy change of the homolysis at 0 K, although the enthalpy change at 298 K is also a frequently encountered parameter.

Dimethylformamide is an organic compound with the chemical formula HCON(CH3)2. Its structure is HC(=O)−N(−CH3)2. Commonly abbreviated as DMF, this colourless liquid is miscible with water and the majority of organic liquids. DMF is a common solvent for chemical reactions. Dimethylformamide is odorless, but technical-grade or degraded samples often have a fishy smell due to impurity of dimethylamine. Dimethylamine degradation impurities can be removed by sparging samples with an inert gas such as argon or by sonicating the samples under reduced pressure. As its name indicates, it is structurally related to formamide, having two methyl groups in the place of the two hydrogens. DMF is a polar (hydrophilic) aprotic solvent with a high boiling point. It facilitates reactions that follow polar mechanisms, such as SN2 reactions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Metal ammine complex</span> Class of chemical compounds

In coordination chemistry, metal ammine complexes are metal complexes containing at least one ammonia ligand. "Ammine" is spelled this way for historical reasons; in contrast, alkyl or aryl bearing ligands are spelt with a single "m". Almost all metal ions bind ammonia as a ligand, but the most prevalent examples of ammine complexes are for Cr(III), Co(III), Ni(II), Cu(II) as well as several platinum group metals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2,2,2-Trifluoroethanol</span> Chemical compound

2,2,2-Trifluoroethanol is the organic compound with the formula CF3CH2OH. Also known as TFE or trifluoroethyl alcohol, this colourless, water-miscible liquid has a smell reminiscent of ethanol. Due to the electronegativity of the trifluoromethyl group, this alcohol exhibits a stronger acidic character compared to ethanol.

In chemistry a donor number (DN) is a quantitative measure of Lewis basicity. A donor number is defined as the negative enthalpy value for the 1:1 adduct formation between a Lewis base and the standard Lewis acid SbCl5 (antimony pentachloride), in dilute solution in the noncoordinating solvent 1,2-dichloroethane with a zero DN. The units are kilocalories per mole for historical reasons. The donor number is a measure of the ability of a solvent to solvate cations and Lewis acids. The method was developed by V. Gutmann in 1976. Likewise Lewis acids are characterized by acceptor numbers (AN, see Gutmann–Beckett method).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Adduct</span> Product of direct addition of two or more distinct molecules

In chemistry, an adduct is a product of a direct addition of two or more distinct molecules, resulting in a single reaction product containing all atoms of all components. The resultant is considered a distinct molecular species. Examples include the addition of sodium bisulfite to an aldehyde to give a sulfonate. It can be considered as a single product resulting from the direct combination of different molecules which comprises all atoms of the reactant molecules.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Antimony pentachloride</span> Chemical compound

Antimony pentachloride is a chemical compound with the formula SbCl5. It is a colourless oil, but typical samples are yellowish due to dissolved chlorine. Owing to its tendency to hydrolyse to hydrochloric acid, SbCl5 is a highly corrosive substance and must be stored in glass or PTFE containers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Transition state theory</span> Theory describing the reaction rates of elementary chemical reactions

In chemistry, transition state theory (TST) explains the reaction rates of elementary chemical reactions. The theory assumes a special type of chemical equilibrium (quasi-equilibrium) between reactants and activated transition state complexes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diethyl sulfide</span> Chemical compound

Diethyl sulfide is an organosulfur compound with the chemical formula (CH3CH2)2S. It is a colorless, malodorous liquid. Although a common thioether, it has few applications.

In coordination chemistry, a stability constant is an equilibrium constant for the formation of a complex in solution. It is a measure of the strength of the interaction between the reagents that come together to form the complex. There are two main kinds of complex: compounds formed by the interaction of a metal ion with a ligand and supramolecular complexes, such as host–guest complexes and complexes of anions. The stability constant(s) provide(s) the information required to calculate the concentration(s) of the complex(es) in solution. There are many areas of application in chemistry, biology and medicine.

Acid strength is the tendency of an acid, symbolised by the chemical formula , to dissociate into a proton, , and an anion, . The dissociation or ionization of a strong acid in solution is effectively complete, except in its most concentrated solutions.

In chemistry, the Gutmann–Beckett method is an experimental procedure used by chemists to assess the Lewis acidity of molecular species. Triethylphosphine oxide is used as a probe molecule and systems are evaluated by 31P-NMR spectroscopy. In 1975, Viktor Gutmann used 31P-NMR spectroscopy to parameterize Lewis acidity of solvents by acceptor numbers (AN). In 1996, Michael A. Beckett recognised its more generally utility and adapted the procedure so that it could be easily applied to molecular species, when dissolved in weakly Lewis acidic solvents. The term Gutmann–Beckett method was first used in chemical literature in 2007.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rhodium carbonyl chloride</span> Chemical compound

Rhodium carbonyl chloride is an organorhodium compound with the formula Rh2Cl2(CO)4. It is a red-brown volatile solid that is soluble in nonpolar organic solvents. It is a precursor to other rhodium carbonyl complexes, some of which are useful in homogeneous catalysis.

References

  1. Lewis G. N. (1938) Acids and bases Journal of the Franklin Institute, 226, 293-313.
  2. Drago, R. S.; Wayland, B. B. (1965). "A Double-Scale Equation for Correlating Enthalpies of Lewis Acid-Base Interactions". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 87 (16): 3571–3577. doi:10.1021/ja01094a008.
  3. Drago, R. S.; Vogel, G. C.; Needham, T. E. (1971). "A Four-Parameter Equation for Predicting Enthalpies of Adduct Formation". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 93 (23): 6014–6026. doi:10.1021/ja00752a010.
  4. Drago, R. S.; Ferris, D. C..P.; Wong, N..M. (1990). "A method for the analysis and prediction of gas-phase ion-molecule enthalpies". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 112 (24): 8953–8961–2479. doi:10.1021/ja00180a047.
  5. Vogel G. C.; Drago, R. S. (1996). "The ECW Model". Journal of Chemical Education. 73 (8): 701–707. Bibcode:1996JChEd..73..701V. doi:10.1021/ed073p701.
  6. Drago, R. S.; Dadmun, A. P.; Vogel, G. C. (1992). "Addition of new donors to the E and C model". Inorganic Chemistry. 32 (11): 2473–2479. doi:10.1021/ic00063a045.
  7. Drago, R. S.; Joerg, S. (1996). "Phosphine EB and CB Values". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 118 (11): 2654–2663. doi:10.1021/ja953581e.
  8. Cramer, R. E.; Bopp, T. T. (1977). "Graphical display of the enthalpies of adduct formation for Lewis acids and bases". Journal of Chemical Education. 54: 612–613. doi:10.1021/ed054p612. The plots shown in this paper used older parameters. Improved E&C parameters are listed in the tables and in references 5 and 6.
  9. Drago, R. S.; Bilgrien, C. J. (1988). "Inductive transfer and coordination of ligands in metal-metal bonded systems". Polyhedron. 7 (16–17): 1453–1468. doi:10.1016/S0277-5387(00)81774-X.
  10. Drago, R. S. (1982). "The question of a synergistic metal-metal interaction leading to .pi.-back-bond stabilization in dirhodium tetrabutyrate adducts". Inorg. Chem. 21 (4): 1697–1698. doi:10.1021/ic00134a093.
  11. Drago, R. S.; Vogel, G. C. (1992). "Interpretation of spectroscopic changes upon adduct formation and their use to determine electrostatic and covalent (E and C) parameters". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 114 (24): 9527–9532. doi:10.1021/ja00050a035.
  12. Drago, R. S. Applications of Electrostatic-Covalent Models in Chemistry, Surfside: Gainesville, FL, 1994.
  13. Drago, R.; Wong, N. S. (1996). "The Role of Electron-Density Transfer and Electronegativity in Understanding Chemical Reactivity and Bonding". Journal of Chemical Education. 73 (2): 123–129. Bibcode:1996JChEd..73..123D. doi:10.1021/ed073p123.
  14. Laurence, C. and Gal, J-F. Lewis Basicity and Affinity Scales, Data and Measurement, (Wiley 2010) p 51 ISBN 978-0-470-74957-9
  15. Laurence, C. and Gal, J-F. Lewis Basicity and Affinity Scales, Data and Measurement, (Wiley 2010) pp 50-51 ISBN 978-0-470-74957-9