In mathematics, especially homotopy theory, a cartesian fibration is, roughly, a map so that every lift exists that is a final object among all lifts. For example, the forgetful functor
Given a functor , a morphism in is called -cartesian or simply cartesian if the natural map
is bijective.[1][2] Explicitly, thus, is cartesian if given
and
with , there exists a unique in such that .
Then is called a cartesian fibration if for each morphism of the form in S, there exists a -cartesian morphism in C such that .[3] Here, the object is unique up to unique isomorphisms (if is another lift, there is a unique , which is shown to be an isomorphism). Because of this, the object is often thought of as the pullback of and is sometimes even denoted as .[4] Also, somehow informally, is said to be a final object among all lifts of .
A morphism between cartesian fibrations over the same base S is a map (functor) over the base; i.e., that sends cartesian morphisms to cartesian morphisms.[5] Given , a 2-morphism is an invertible map (map = natural transformation) such that for each object in the source of , maps to the identity map of the object under .
This way, all the cartesian fibrations over the fixed base category S determine the (2, 1)-category denoted by .[6]
Basic example
Let be the category where
an object is a pair of a scheme and a quasi-coherent sheaf on it,
a morphism consists of a morphism of schemes and a sheaf homomorphism on ,
the composition of and above is the (unique) morphism such that and is
Given a category , the Grothendieck construction gives an equivalence of ∞-categories between and the ∞-category of prestacks on (prestacks = category-valued presheaves).[8]
Roughly, the construction goes as follows: given a cartesian fibration , we let be the map that sends each object x in S to the fiber . So, is a -valued presheaf or a prestack. Conversely, given a prestack , define the category where an object is a pair with and then let be the forgetful functor to . Then these two assignments give the claimed equivalence.
For example, if the construction is applied to the forgetful , then we get the map that sends a scheme to the category of quasi-coherent sheaves on . Conversely, is determined by such a map.
Lurie's straightening theorem generalizes the above equivalence to the equivalence between the ∞-category of cartesian fibrations over some ∞-category C and the ∞-category of ∞-prestacks on C.[9]
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.