Cartesian fibration

Last updated

In mathematics, especially homotopy theory, a cartesian fibration is, roughly, a map so that every lift exists that is a final object among all lifts. For example, the forgetful functor

Contents

from the category of pairs of schemes and quasi-coherent sheaves on them is a cartesian fibration (see § Basic example). In fact, the Grothendieck construction says all cartesian fibrations are of this type; i.e., they simply forget extra data. See also: fibred category, prestack.

The dual of a cartesian fibration is called an op-fibration; in particular, not a cocartesian fibration.

A right fibration between simplicial sets is an example of a cartesian fibration.

Definition

Given a functor , a morphism in is called -cartesian or simply cartesian if the natural map

is bijective. [1] [2] Explicitly, thus, is cartesian if given

with , there exists a unique in such that .

Then is called a cartesian fibration if for each morphism of the form in S, there exists a -cartesian morphism in C such that . [3] Here, the object is unique up to unique isomorphisms (if is another lift, there is a unique , which is shown to be an isomorphism). Because of this, the object is often thought of as the pullback of and is sometimes even denoted as . [4] Also, somehow informally, is said to be a final object among all lifts of .

A morphism between cartesian fibrations over the same base S is a map (functor) over the base; i.e., that sends cartesian morphisms to cartesian morphisms. [5] Given , a 2-morphism is an invertible map (map = natural transformation) such that for each object in the source of , maps to the identity map of the object under .

This way, all the cartesian fibrations over the fixed base category S determine the (2, 1)-category denoted by . [6]

Basic example

Let be the category where

To see the forgetful map

is a cartesian fibration, [7] let be in . Take

with and . We claim is cartesian. Given and with , if exists such that , then we have is

So, the required trivially exists and is unqiue.

Note some authors consider , the core of instead. In that case, the forgetful map restricted to it is also a cartesian fibration.

Grothendieck construction

Given a category , the Grothendieck construction gives an equivalence of ∞-categories between and the ∞-category of prestacks on (prestacks = category-valued presheaves). [8]

Roughly, the construction goes as follows: given a cartesian fibration , we let be the map that sends each object x in S to the fiber . So, is a -valued presheaf or a prestack. Conversely, given a prestack , define the category where an object is a pair with and then let be the forgetful functor to . Then these two assignments give the claimed equivalence.

For example, if the construction is applied to the forgetful , then we get the map that sends a scheme to the category of quasi-coherent sheaves on . Conversely, is determined by such a map.

Lurie's straightening theorem generalizes the above equivalence to the equivalence between the ∞-category of cartesian fibrations over some ∞-category C and the ∞-category of ∞-prestacks on C. [9]

See also

Footnotes

  1. Kerodon , Definition 5.0.0.1.
  2. Khan 2022 , Definition 3.1.1.
  3. Khan 2022 , Definition 3.1.2.
  4. Vistoli 2008 , Definition 3.1. and § 3.1.2.
  5. Vistoli 2008 , Definition 3.6.
  6. Khan 2022 , Construction 3.1.4.
  7. Khan 2022 , Example 3.1.3.
  8. Khan 2022 , Theorem 3.1.5.
  9. An introduction in Louis Martini, Cocartesian fibrations and straightening internal to an ∞-topos [arXiv:2204.00295]

References

Further reading