Castration of Popish Ecclesiastics

Last updated
Title page of the first printing (London: A. Baldwin, 1700) Anon. Reasons for the Castration of Popish Ecclesiastics, 1700 (cropped).gif
Title page of the first printing (London: A. Baldwin, 1700)

Reasons humbly offer'd for a Law to enact the Castration of Popish Ecclesiastic[k]s is an anonymous anti-Catholic quarto pamphlet published in London in 1700. The work has been disputedly attributed to Daniel Defoe. [1] [2] [3]

Contents

Context

The work is ostensibly very offensive in tone, but G. C. Moore Smith thinks it might be an ironic satire in the manner of Defoe's The Shortest Way with the Dissenters , which promoted increased hostility towards another religious minority in England. [4] The author's broader purpose in this pamphlet was to advocate for a Protestant alliance in Europe against Louis XIV's France. [5]

Summary

As evidence of the wickedness of the Roman Catholic priests the author cites the authority of Foxe's Acts and Monuments for accusations of infanticide and sexual immorality. He holds that the celibacy of the priests was ordained by the "Romish Church" in order that they might have a firmer hold upon the women, and he adduces five main arguments in support of his assertion. [6] He argues that enforced chastity has made the priests more lecherous than ordinary men, and that enforced castration may be the only cure to their immense sexual appetite. [7] To the crimes with which the priests are charged is added, in conclusion, the following accusation:

They not only corrupt the Morals of People themselves by such Practices and Principles as above mention'd, but bring over and encourage others to do it; particularly those Italians, &c. who sell and print Aretin's Postures ; and in order to debauch the Minds of Women, and to make them guilty of unnatural Crims[ sic ] invent and sell 'em such things as Modesty forbids to name.

Editions

The work was reprinted in Dublin as Reasons humbly offer'd to both houses of parliament, for a new Law to enact the castration or gelding of popish ecclasiastics, in this kingdom ... As the best way to prevent the growth of popery (Dublin, 1710; price 3d; 4to. 16 pp.) [8]

In the 19th century this pamphlet was reprinted by the Protestant Evangelical Mission and Electoral Union in a tract of 32 pages, [9] to which was added an Appendix containing the three following pieces:

  1. An account, extracted from The Times of 16 May 1860, of the trial, at Turin, in that year, of the Carmelite priest, Gurlino, who was condemned to seven years solitary confinement for having had sexual relations with a number of virgins. [10] 33 girls gave evidence against him. [11] The relations of a young girl found in her possession an obscene print, and insisted on her telling them from whom she had procured it. [11] The girl refused for some time, but eventually named her confessor. [11] She added that several of her friends had also received from Don Gurlino immoral books and prints and had been seduced by him. [11]
  2. A Pastoral Address by the Bishop of London. Published A.D. 1751. [12]
  3. Facts connected with the Arrest of William Murphy at Bolton, Lancashire, July 14, 1868. [12]

Related Research Articles

This article contains information about the literary events and publications of 1700.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Popery</span> Historical and derogatory name for Roman Catholics or Catholicism

The words Popery and Papism are mainly historical pejorative words in the English language for Roman Catholicism, once frequently used by Protestants and Eastern Orthodox Christians to label their Roman Catholic opponents, who differed from them in accepting the authority of the Pope over the Christian Church. The words were popularised during the English Reformation (1532–1559), when the Church of England broke away from the Roman Catholic Church and divisions emerged between those who rejected Papal authority and those who continued to follow Rome. The words are recognised as pejorative; they have been in widespread use in Protestant writings until the mid-nineteenth century, including use in some laws that remain in force in the United Kingdom.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Exclusion Crisis</span>

The Exclusion Crisis ran from 1679 until 1681 in the reign of King Charles II of England, Scotland and Ireland. Three Exclusion bills sought to exclude the King's brother and heir presumptive, James, Duke of York, from the thrones of England, Scotland and Ireland because he was Catholic. None became law. Two new parties formed. The Tories were opposed to this exclusion while the "Country Party", who were soon to be called the Whigs, supported it. While the matter of James's exclusion was not decided in Parliament during Charles's reign, it would come to a head only three years after James took the throne, when he was deposed in the Glorious Revolution of 1688. Finally, the Act of Settlement 1701 decided definitively that Catholics were to be excluded from the English, Scottish and Irish thrones, now the British throne.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Registration Act</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Registration Act was an Act of the Parliament of Ireland passed in 1704, which required all "Popish" priests to register at their local magistrates' court, to pay two 50-pound bonds to ensure good behavior, and to stay in the county where they registered.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Whiggism</span> Political philosophy

Whiggism is a political philosophy that grew out of the Parliamentarian faction in the Wars of the Three Kingdoms (1639–1651). The Whigs' key policy positions were the supremacy of Parliament, tolerance of Protestant dissenters, and opposition to a "Papist" on the throne, especially James II or one of his descendants. It is associated with early conservative liberalism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roger L'Estrange</span> English pamphleteer and author, and staunch defender of royalist claims (1616-1704)

Sir Roger L'Estrange was an English pamphleteer, author, courtier, and press censor. Throughout his life L'Estrange was frequently mired in controversy and acted as a staunch ideological defender of King Charles II's regime during the Restoration era. His works played a key role in the emergence of a distinct 'Tory' bloc during the Exclusion Crisis of 1679-81. Perhaps his best known polemical pamphlet was An Account of the Growth of Knavery, which ruthlessly attacked the parliamentary opposition to Charles II and his successor James, Duke of York, placing them as fanatics who misused contemporary popular anti-Catholic sentiment to attack the Restoration court and the existing social order in order to pursue their own political ends. Following the Exclusion Crisis and the failure of the nascent Whig faction to disinherit James, Duke of York in favour of Charles II's illegitimate son James, 1st Duke of Monmouth L'Estrange used his newspaper The Observator to harangue his opponents and act as a voice for a popular provincial Toryism during the 'Tory Reaction' of 1681-85. Despite serving as an MP from 1685-89 his stock fell under James II's reign as his staunch hostility to religious nonconformism conflicted with James' goals of religious tolerance for both Catholics and Nonconformists. The Glorious Revolution of 1688 and the collapse of the Restoration political order heralded the end of L'Estrange's career in public life, although his greatest translation work, that of Aesop's Fables, saw publication in 1692.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hugh Boulter</span> Anglican bishop (1672–1742)

Hugh Boulter was the Church of Ireland Archbishop of Armagh, the Primate of All Ireland, from 1724 until his death. He also served as the chaplain to George I from 1719.

<i>Universalis Ecclesiae</i> 1850 papal bull by Pope Pius IX re-establishing the Catholic diocesan hierarchy in England

Universalis Ecclesiae was a papal bull of 29 September 1850 by which Pope Pius IX recreated the Roman Catholic diocesan hierarchy in England, which had been extinguished with the death of the last Marian bishop in the reign of Elizabeth I. New names were given to the dioceses, as the old ones were in use by the Church of England. The bull aroused considerable anti-Catholic feeling among English Protestants.

In Ireland, the penal laws were a series of legal disabilities imposed in the seventeenth, and early eighteenth, centuries on the kingdom's Roman Catholic majority and, to a lesser degree, on Protestant "Dissenters". Enacted by the Irish Parliament, they secured the Protestant Ascendancy by further concentrating property and public office in the hands of those who, as communicants of the established Church of Ireland, subscribed to the Oath of Supremacy. The Oath acknowledged the British monarch as the "supreme governor" of matters both spiritual and temporal, and abjured "all foreign jurisdictions [and] powers"—by implication both the Pope in Rome and the Stuart "Pretender" in the court of the King of France.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Popery Act 1698</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Popery Act 1698 was an Act of Parliament of the Parliament of England enacted in 1700. The long title of the Act was "An Act for the further preventing the Growth of Popery".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">St John the Evangelist Friday Street</span> Church

St John the Evangelist Friday Street was a church in Bread Street Ward of the City of London. It was destroyed in the Great Fire of London of 1666, and not rebuilt, the parish being united with that of All Hallows, Bread Street.

The Roman Catholic Relief Bills were a series of measures introduced over time in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries before the Parliaments of Great Britain and the United Kingdom to remove the restrictions and prohibitions imposed on British and Irish Catholics during the English Reformation. These restrictions had been introduced to enforce the separation of the English church from the Catholic Church which began in 1529 under Henry VIII.

William Clagett (1646–1688) was an English clergyman, known as a controversialist.

Thomas Bell was an English Roman Catholic priest, and later an anti-Catholic writer.

Events from the year 1704 in Ireland.

John Arnold, widely known as John Arnold of Monmouthshire, was a Welsh Protestant politician and Whig MP. He was one of the most prominent people in Monmouthshire in the late 17th century. A stark anti-Catholic, he was a notable figure during the Popish plot and the suppression of Catholicism in the country. Arnold represented the constituencies around Monmouth and Southwark in Parliament in the 1680s and 1690s. His strong anti-Catholic beliefs and insurgences against Catholic priests made him an unpopular and controversial figure amongst his peers and in his native Monmouthshire. In his later years, his behaviour became increasingly eccentric, and he was widely believed to have faked an attempt on his own life. Amongst his associates were Titus Oates and Anthony Ashley Cooper, 1st Earl of Shaftesbury.

William Payne (1650–1696) was an English academic and cleric of the Church of England, known as a controversialist.

<i>The Apparition of Mrs. Veal</i> 1706 pamphlet by Daniel Defoe

The Apparition of Mrs. Veal is a pamphlet that was published anonymously in 1706 and is usually attributed to Daniel Defoe. Titled in full A True Relation of the Apparition of one Mrs. Veal, the next Day after her Death: to one Mrs. Bargrave at Canterbury. The 8th of September, 1705, it has been described as "the first modern ghost story".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Popery Act 1627</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Popery Act 1627 was an Act of Parliament passed by the Parliament of England. Its long title is "An Act to restrain the passing or sending of any to be Popishly bred beyond the Seas". This was the only penal law to be passed during the reign of Charles I.

DonGurlino was a 19th-century Carmelite priest, active in Turin, who was scandalously convicted in 1860 of having seduced and had sexual relations with a number of girls to whom he acted as confessor; he was sentenced to seven years solitary confinement.

References

  1. National Library of Ireland.
  2. National Library of Australia.
  3. Moore Smith 1929, pp. 64–6.
  4. Moore Smith 1929, p. 64.
  5. Moore Smith 1929, pp. 64–5.
  6. Ashbee 1879, pp. 208–11.
  7. Peakman 2003, p. 134.
  8. Fenning 1998, p. 117.
  9. Ashbee 1879, p. 211.
  10. Ashbee 1879, pp. 211–12.
  11. 1 2 3 4 Ashbee 1879, p. 212.
  12. 1 2 Ashbee 1879, p. 212.

Sources

Further reading