Center for Justice Innovation

Last updated
Center for Justice Innovation
Type Nonprofit organization, think tank
Headquarters New York, New York, United States
Director
Courtney Bryan
Website www.innovatingjustice.org
Formerly called
Center for Court Innovation

The Center for Justice Innovation, formerly the Center for Court Innovation, is an American non-profit organization headquartered in New York, founded in 1996, with a stated goal of creating a more effective and human justice system by offering aid to victims, reducing crime and improving public trust in justice. [1]

Contents

Originally founded as a public/private partnership between the New York State Unified Court System and the Fund for the City of New York, the Center for Justice Innovation creates operating programs to test new ideas and solve problems, performs original research to determine what works, and provides assistance to justice reformers around the world. [2] The center’s projects include community-based violence prevention projects, alternatives to incarceration, reentry initiatives, and court-based programs such as the Midtown Community Court [3] and Red Hook Community Justice Center as well as drug courts, [4] reentry courts, [5] domestic violence courts, [6] mental health courts [7] and others. Their goal is to reduce the use of unnecessary incarceration and promote positive individual and family change.

The center works with jurisdictions around the U.S. and the rest of the world to disseminate lessons learned from innovative programs and provide hands-on assistance to criminal justice practitioners interested in the deployment of new research-based strategies to improve the delivery of justice. The center received an Innovations in American Government Award from the Ford Foundation and Harvard University. [8] The center's first director was John Feinblatt, who went on to serve as a senior advisor to New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg. From 2002 to 2020, Greg Berman served as director. The current leadership is executive director, Courtney Bryan, along with an advisory board.

History

The Red Hook Community Justice Center Red Hook Community Justice Ctr 88 Visitation Pl jeh.jpg
The Red Hook Community Justice Center

The Center for Court Innovation grew out of an experiment in judicial problem-solving. The Midtown Community Court was created in 1993 to address low-level charges around Times Square. [9] The Midtown Court responds creatively, seeking sentences that are restorative to the victim, defendant, and community. [10] The project’s success in reducing both crime and incarceration led the court’s planners, with the support of New York State’s chief judge, to establish the Center for Court Innovation to serve as an engine for ongoing court reform in New York. According to former New York State Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye, "In creating the Center, we essentially adapted a model from the private sector: we chose to make an ongoing investment in research and development, and we chose to shield these functions from the daily pressures of managing the courts. The results have been unmistakable: the Center for Court Innovation has helped keep New York at the forefront of court reform for more than a decade." [1]

The Center for Court Innovation has implemented and run over three dozen operating programs, many of which now function independently of the center. The Center for Court has also produced original research about hundreds of justice initiatives, and hosted tens of thousands of visitors interested in justice reform. Center planners collaborate with practitioners beyond New York, such as government leaders in Great Britain with a goal of replicating the Red Hook Community Justice Center in North Liverpool. [11] Center planners have also worked with officials in San Francisco, who created a new community justice center [12] to serve the city's Tenderloin neighborhood. Among other things, the center helped court planners in San Francisco complete an extensive community planning effort, including a needs assessment. [13]

The center has received numerous awards for its efforts, including the Innovations in American Government Award from Harvard University and the Ford Foundation, the Peter F. Drucker Award for Nonprofit Innovation [14] from Claremont Graduate University and the Prize for Public Sector Innovation from the Citizens Budget Commission.

Programs

The Center for Court Innovation conceives, plans, and operates programs that seek to test new ideas, solve difficult problems, and achieve system change. Their projects include community-based violence prevention projects, alternatives to incarceration, reentry initiatives, and court-based programs that reduce the use of unnecessary incarceration and promote positive individual and family change. [15] While the center’s programs cover a broad range of topics and differ in size, the approach is always the same: thoughtful, collaborative planning, an emphasis on creativity, and the rigorous use of data to document results. The center’s projects have achieved tangible results like safer streets, [16] reduced levels of incarceration and fear, [17] and improved neighborhood perceptions of justice.

Aside from the Midtown Community Court and Red Hook Community Justice Center, some of the center’s other projects include the Harlem Community Justice Center, [18] Bronx Community Solutions, [19] Queens Youth Justice Center, [20] Brooklyn Treatment Court, [21] Youth Justice Board, [22] Youth Courts, [23] Newark Community Solutions, [24] Brooklyn Mental Health Court, [25] Parole Reentry Court, [26] and Crown Heights Community Mediation Center. [27]

One of their court-affiliated restorative justice programs, Circles for Safe Streets, facilitates discussions between drivers and the people they have injured during a traffic collision. [28]

Professional assistance

The Center for Court Innovation provides hands-on, expert assistance to reformers around the world, including judges, attorneys, justice officials, community organizations, and others. Experts from the center are available to help plan, implement and evaluate new policies, practices, and technologies. Their assistance takes many forms, including help with analyzing data, facilitating planning sessions, and hosting site visits to our operating programs in the New York City area.

The center has won national "requests for proposals" to provide technical assistance in a growing number of areas, including community prosecution, domestic violence, drug courts, technology, tribal justice, procedural justice, and institutionalizing problem-solving justice. [29]

More than a dozen community courts have opened in South Africa, [30] and staff from the center have also worked with officials from Scotland, Japan, Australia, Ireland, New Zealand and Canada on adapting the community court model. [31]

The center has published dozens of how-to manuals and best practice guides for criminal justice officials, culling the lessons from successful justice innovations and disseminating them to the field. [32] The center’s web site [33] was named a "Top 10" web site by Justice Served .

Research

The center publishes research about its own experiments and innovative initiatives around the United States and world. [34] Researchers at the center conduct independent evaluations, document how government systems work, how neighborhoods function, and how reform efforts create change. The purpose of the research is to identify best practices as well as strategies that do not work or can be improved.

In 2010, Urban Institute Press published Trial & Error in Criminal Justice Reform: Learning from Failure [35] by Greg Berman and Aubrey Fox. In 2005, The New Press published Good Courts: The Case for Problem-Solving Justice. [36] The first book to describe the problem-solving court movement in detail, Good Courts features profiles of Center demonstration projects, including the Midtown Community Court and the Red Hook Community Justice Center. "Sociologists and those within the legal system will no doubt be intrigued by this accessible and provocative call for change," Publishers Weekly said in its review. All authors’ proceeds from the book, which is being used in law schools and public policy classes, benefit the Center for Court Innovation. [37] The center has also published the books Daring to Fail: First-Person Stories of Criminal Justice Reform, [38] A Problem-Solving Revolution: Making Change Happen in State Courts, [39] Documenting Results: Research on Problem-Solving Justice, [40] and Personal Stories: Narratives from Across New York State. [41]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Recidivism</span> Person repeating an undesirable behavior following punishment

Recidivism is the act of a person repeating an undesirable behavior after they have experienced negative consequences of that behavior, or have been trained to extinguish it. Recidivism is also used to refer to the percentage of former prisoners who are rearrested for a similar offense.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">New York City Criminal Court</span> Court in New York, United States

The Criminal Court of the City of New York is a court of the State Unified Court System in New York City that handles misdemeanors and lesser offenses, and also conducts arraignments and preliminary hearings in felony cases.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">American juvenile justice system</span> Aspect of American justice system

The American juvenile justice system is the primary system used to handle minors who are convicted of criminal offenses. The system is composed of a federal and many separate state, territorial, and local jurisdictions, with states and the federal government sharing sovereign police power under the common authority of the United States Constitution. The juvenile justice system intervenes in delinquent behavior through police, court, and correctional involvement, with the goal of rehabilitation. Youth and their guardians can face a variety of consequences including probation, community service, youth court, youth incarceration and alternative schooling. The juvenile justice system, similar to the adult system, operates from a belief that intervening early in delinquent behavior will deter adolescents from engaging in criminal behavior as adults.

Mental health courts link offenders who would ordinarily be prison-bound to long-term community-based treatment. They rely on mental health assessments, individualized treatment plans, and ongoing judicial monitoring to address both the mental health needs of offenders and public safety concerns of communities. Like other problem-solving courts such as drug courts, domestic violence courts, and community courts, mental health courts seek to address the underlying problems that contribute to criminal behavior.

In several countries including Australia, the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and South Africa, a community court is a neighborhood-focused problem-solving court that applies a problem-solving approach to local crime and safety concerns. Community courts can take many forms, but all strive to create new relationships, both within the justice system and with outside stakeholders such as residents, merchants, churches and schools. Community courts emphasize collaboration, crime prevention, and improved outcomes, including lower recidivism and safer communities. Community courts are also sometimes referred to as community or neighborhood justice centers.

Rehabilitation Through the Arts (RTA) was founded by Katherine Vockins in 1996 in Sing Sing Correctional Facility in Ossining, New York, and now operates in six men's and women's, maximum and medium security New York State prisons: Sing Sing, Bedford Hills, Woodbourne, Green Haven, Fishkill and Taconic. RTA is the lead program of Prison Communities International, a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt non-profit organization. RTA brings art workshops in theatre, music, dance, visual arts, writing and poetry behind the walls to over 230 incarcerated men and women.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Midtown Community Court</span> New York City court for quality-of-life offenses

The Midtown Community Court is a part of the New York City Criminal Court that focuses on quality-of-life offenses, such as prostitution, shoplifting, farebeating and vandalism, with a view toward rehabilitation instead of punishment. For example, judges may order offenders to perform community service and refer them to such social services as drug treatment, mental health counseling, and job training.

Specialized domestic violence courts are designed to improve victim safety and enhance defendant accountability. There is no one set definition of a specialized violence court, although these types of courts can be either civil or criminal and typically hear the majority of an area's domestic violence cases on a separate calendar. Additionally, these courts are typically led by specially assigned judges who can make more informed and consistent decisions based on their expertise and experience with the unique legal and personal issues in domestic violence cases.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Youth incarceration in the United States</span>

The United States incarcerates more of its youth than any other country in the world,, through the juvenile courts and the adult criminal justice system, which reflects the larger trends in incarceration practices in the United States. In 2010, approximately 70,800 juveniles were incarcerated in youth detention facilities alone. As of 2006, approximately 500,000 youth were brought to detention centers in a given year. This data does not reflect juveniles tried as adults. As of 2013, around 40% were incarcerated in privatized, for-profit facilities.

Problem-solving courts (PSC) address the underlying problems that contribute to criminal behavior and are a current trend in the legal system of the United States. In 1989, a judge in Miami began to take a hands-on approach to drug addicts, ordering them into treatment, rather than perpetuating the revolving door of court and prison. The result was creation of drug court, a diversion program. That same concept began to be applied to difficult situations where legal, social and human problems mesh. There were over 2,800 problem-solving courts in 2008, intended to provide a method of resolving the problem in order to reduce recidivism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Incarceration prevention in the United States</span> Methods to reduce prison populations in America

Incarceration prevention refers to a variety of methods aimed at reducing prison populations and costs while fostering enhanced social structures. Due to the nature of incarceration in the United States today caused by issues leading to increased incarceration rates, there are methods aimed at preventing the incarceration of at-risk populations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal justice reform in the United States</span> Reforms seeking to address structural issues in criminal justice systems of the United States

Criminal justice reform seeks to address structural issues in criminal justice systems such as racial profiling, police brutality, overcriminalization, mass incarceration, and recidivism. Reforms can take place at any point where the criminal justice system intervenes in citizens’ lives, including lawmaking, policing, sentencing and incarceration. Criminal justice reform can also address the collateral consequences of conviction, including disenfranchisement or lack of access to housing or employment, that may restrict the rights of individuals with criminal records.

The Georgia Council on Criminal Justice Reform is a fifteen-member, non-partisan state commission tasked with conducting annual comprehensive reviews of criminal laws, criminal procedure, sentencing laws, adult correctional issues, juvenile justice issues, enhancement of probation and parole supervision, better management of the prison population and of the population in the custody of the Department of Juvenile Justice, and other issues relates to criminal proceedings and accountability courts in the state of Georgia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jeremy Travis</span> American academic administrator

Jeremy Travis is an American academic administrator who served as the fourth president of John Jay College of Criminal Justice, a senior college of the City University of New York, starting on August 16, 2004. On October 25, 2016, Travis announced that he would step down from his position as president the next year. In August 2017, he joined the Arnold Ventures LLC as Senior Vice President of Criminal Justice.

The Massachusetts Institute for a New Commonwealth, or "MassINC," is registered as a non-profit 501(c) organization that functions as a nonpartisan, evidence-based think tank. Its mission is to develop a public agenda for Massachusetts that promotes the growth and vitality of the middle class. Its governing philosophy is rooted in the ideals embodied in the American Dream: equality of opportunity, personal responsibility, and a strong commonwealth. Their mission is to promote a public agenda for the middle class and to help all citizens achieve the American dream.

Prisoner reentry is the process by which prisoners who have been released return to the community. Many types of programs have been implemented with the goal of reducing recidivism and have been found to be effective for this purpose. Consideration for the conditions of the communities formerly incarcerated individuals are re-entering, which are often disadvantaged, is a fundamental part of successful re-entry.

Osborne Association is a non-governmental, multi-service, criminal justice reform, and direct service organization. Osborne runs programs for people who have been in conflict with the law and their families. It operates from community offices in Brooklyn, The Bronx, Buffalo, Manhattan, and Newburgh, New York, White Plains, New York, Troy, New York and inside more than forty New York State prisons and jails. They work with the families and communities of incarcerated individuals to try and redress harm done by the criminal justice system, whilst also working to reform the system by challenging racist policies and retributive justice.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Decarceration in the United States</span> Overview article

Decarceration in the United States involves government policies and community campaigns aimed at reducing the number of people held in custody or custodial supervision. Decarceration, the opposite of incarceration, also entails reducing the rate of imprisonment at the federal, state and municipal level. As of 2019, the US was home to 5% of the global population but 25% of its prisoners. Until the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. possessed the world's highest incarceration rate: 655 inmates for every 100,000 people, enough inmates to equal the populations of Philadelphia or Houston. The COVID-19 pandemic has reinvigorated the discussion surrounding decarceration as the spread of the virus poses a threat to the health of those incarcerated in prisons and detention centers where the ability to properly socially distance is limited. As a result of the push for decarceration in the wake of the pandemic, as of 2022, the incarceration rate in the United States declined to 505 per 100,000, resulting in the United States no longer having the highest incarceration rate in the world, but still remaining in the top five.

John Feinblatt is an American gun control activist, lawyer, and author. He is the president of both Everytown for Gun Safety, a U.S. gun-violence prevention organization, and The Trace (website), a media outlet funded by Everytown.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Laurie O. Robinson</span> American scholar and public servant

Laurie Robinson is an American scholar and public servant who has held multiple positions across government, academia, and the nonprofit sector. Robinson's most notable roles include serving as Assistant Attorney General in charge of the U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs under former Presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, and co-chairing Obama's Task Force on 21st Century Policing. She also served on the congressionally created Charles Colson Task Force on Federal Corrections and on an independent commission that explored the potential closure of New York City's Rikers Island jail complex. Most recently, Robinson served as founding Chair of the Board of Directors of the Council on Criminal Justice, a nonpartisan policy and research organization.

References

  1. 1 2 "A Decade of Change: The First 10 Years of the Center for Court Innovation" (PDF). Center for Court Innovation.
  2. ↑ See https://www.courtinnovation.org/programs for a complete list of the Center's demonstration projects.
  3. ↑ "Midtown Community Court | Center for Court Innovation". Courtinnovation.org. December 31, 2011. Retrieved August 29, 2018.
  4. ↑ Eckholm, Erik (October 15, 2008). "Courts Give Addicts a Chance to Straighten Out". The New York Times. Retrieved April 28, 2010.
  5. ↑ "Coming Home to Harlem: A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Harlem Parole Reentry Court" (PDF). Center for Court Innovation.
  6. ↑ "Planning a Domestic Violence Court: The New York State Experience" (PDF). Center for Court Innovation.
  7. ↑ "Building Trust and Managing Risk: A Look at a Felony Mental Health Court" (PDF). American Psychological Association.
  8. ↑ "Government Innovators Network: Center for Court Innovation, 2005-05-18 10:03:02". Innovations.harvard.edu. Retrieved August 29, 2018.
  9. ↑ "Neighborhood Justice at the Midtown Community Court". National Institute of Justice.
  10. ↑ Dispensing Justice Locally: The Implementation and Effects of the Midtown Community Court. Routledge. 2000. ISBN   9057026147.
  11. ↑ "Community Justice Centres: A US-UK Exchange" (PDF). British Journal of Community Justice.
  12. ↑ "Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco : Home Page". Sfgov.org. January 1, 2012. Retrieved August 29, 2018.
  13. ↑ "Community Justice Center Needs Assessment Report: Tenderloin, South of Market, Civic Center, and Union Square" (PDF). Sfgov.org. Retrieved August 29, 2018.
  14. ↑ "Pacific Standard - Problem-Solving (and Award-Winning) Courts". psmag.com. Retrieved August 29, 2018.
  15. ↑ There is a growing body of literature about problem-solving justice. For an explanation of the six key principles underlying problem-solving justice, see "Principles of Problem-Solving Justice" (PDF). Center for Court Innovation.. New York State Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye has written and lectured frequently about problem-solving justice. See, for example, Judith S. Kaye "Delivering Justice Today: A Problem-Solving Approach" in Yale Law & Policy Review, Vol. 22, 2004 and Judith S. Kaye, "Making the Case for Hands-On Courts," Newsweek, Oct. 11, 1999.
  16. ↑ According to an independent evaluation, the Midtown Community Court contributed to a significant drop in local street crime, including a 56 percent decrease in prostitution arrests. See Dispensing Justice Locally: The Implementation and Effects of the Midtown Community Court. Routledge. 2000. ISBN   9057026147.
  17. ↑ A survey of residents of the Brooklyn neighborhood of Red Hook found that "respondents reported a significant overall increase in the level of safety they felt at various locations in the community" in the year following the opening of the Red Hook Community Justice Center, one of the Center for Court Innovation's most ambitious demonstration projects. See "Op Data, 2001: Red Hook, Brooklyn: Community Assessment and Perceptions of Quality of Life, Safety and Services" (PDF). Center for Court Innovation.
  18. ↑ "Harlem Community Justice Center | Center for Court Innovation". Courtinnovation.org. Retrieved August 29, 2018.
  19. ↑ "Bronx Community Solutions | Center for Court Innovation". Courtinnovation.org. December 29, 2011. Retrieved January 6, 2012.
  20. ↑ "Queens Youth Justice Center; Center for Court Innovation". Courtinnovation.org. December 31, 2011. Retrieved January 17, 2012.
  21. ↑ "Brooklyn Treatment Court | Center for Court Innovation". Courtinnovation.org. December 31, 2011. Retrieved January 6, 2012.
  22. ↑ "Youth Justice Board | Center for Court Innovation". Courtinnovation.org. December 31, 2011. Archived from the original on October 13, 2008. Retrieved January 6, 2012.
  23. ↑ "Youth Courts | Center for Court Innovation". Courtinnovation.org. Retrieved January 17, 2012.
  24. ↑ "Newark Community Solutions | Center for Court Innovation". Courtinnovation.org. Retrieved January 17, 2012.
  25. ↑ "Brooklyn Mental Health Court | Center for Court Innovation". Courtinnovation.org. December 31, 2011. Archived from the original on June 9, 2008. Retrieved January 6, 2012.
  26. ↑ "Parole Reentry Court | Center for Court Innovation". Courtinnovation.org. Archived from the original on July 23, 2010. Retrieved January 6, 2012.
  27. ↑ "Crown Heights Community Mediation Center | Center for Court Innovation". Courtinnovation.org. Archived from the original on August 23, 2010. Retrieved January 6, 2012.
  28. ↑ Cohen, Mari (Fall 2023). "After the Hit-and-Run: Can restorative justice offer crash victims like me—and the drivers who harmed us—the healing we need?". Jewish Currents . Retrieved December 5, 2023.
  29. ↑ "Programs: Community-Based Problem-Solving Criminal Justice Initiative". Ojp.usdoj.gov. Retrieved January 6, 2012.
  30. ↑ "New Community Courts Increase Access to Justice in South Africa". America.gov. May 23, 2007. Archived from the original on October 25, 2011. Retrieved January 6, 2012.
  31. ↑ For a comprehensive overview of community courts around the world, see "Community Courts Across the Globe: A Survey of Goals, Performance Measures and Operations" (PDF). Criminal Justice Inititiative of Open Society Foundation for South Africa. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 22, 2011. Retrieved October 8, 2008.
  32. ↑ "Research | Center for Court Innovation". Courtinnovation.org. December 31, 2011. Retrieved January 6, 2012.
  33. ↑ "The Center for Court Innovation". Archived from the original on November 6, 2006. Retrieved November 6, 2006.
  34. ↑ For a complete list of research papers published by the Center for Court Innovation, see [ permanent dead link ]
  35. ↑ "Trial & Error in Criminal Justice Reform: Learning from Failure".
  36. ↑ Berman, Greg (2005). Good Courts: The Case For Problem-solving Justice (9781565849730): Greg Berman, John Feinblatt, Sarah Glazer: Books. ISBN   1565849736.
  37. ↑ "Microsoft Word - WebsiteVersion_sylgrade_.doc" (PDF). Retrieved January 6, 2012.
  38. ↑ "Daring to Fail: First-Person Stories of Criminal Justice Reform".
  39. ↑ Berman, Greg; Fox, Aubrey; Wolf, Robert V. (2004). A Problem-Solving Revolution: Making Change Happen in State Courts (9780975950500): Center for Court Innovation: Books. ISBN   0975950509.
  40. ↑ Berman, Greg; Rempel, Michael; Wolf, Robert V. (2007). Documenting Results: Research on Problem-Solving Justice (9780975950517): Greg Berman, Michael Rempel, Robert V. Wolf: Books. ISBN   978-0975950517.
  41. ↑ "Drug Courts: Personal Stories".

40°45′13″N73°59′31″W / 40.753665°N 73.991934°W / 40.753665; -73.991934

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.