Chicken as biological research model

Last updated

Chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) and their eggs have been used extensively as research models throughout the history of biology. Today they continue to serve as an important model for normal human biology as well as pathological disease processes.

Contents

A chicken egg. Egg.jpg
A chicken egg.

History

Chicken embryos as a research model

Human fascination with the chicken and its egg are so deeply rooted in history that it is hard to say exactly when avian exploration began. As early as 1400 BCE, ancient Egyptians artificially incubated chicken eggs to propagate their food supply. The developing chicken in the egg first appears in written history after catching the attention of the famous Greek philosopher, Aristotle, around 350 BCE. As Aristotle opened chicken eggs at various time points of incubation, he noted how the organism changed over time. Through his writing of Historia Animalium , he introduced some of the earliest studies of embryology based on his observations of the chicken in the egg.

Aristotle recognized significant similarities between human and chicken development. From his studies of the developing chick, he was able to correctly decipher the role of the placenta and umbilical cord in the human.

Chick research of the 16th century significantly modernized ideas about human physiology. European scientists, including Ulisse Aldrovandi, Volcher Cotier and William Harvey, used the chick to demonstrate tissue differentiation, disproving the widely held belief of the time that organisms are "preformed" in their adult version and only grow larger during development. Distinct tissue areas were recognized that grew and gave rise to specific structures, including the blastoderm, or chick origin. Harvey also closely watched the development of the heart and blood and was the first to note the directional flow of blood between veins and arteries. The relatively large size of the chick as a model organism allowed scientists during this time to make these significant observations without the help of a microscope.

Expanding use of the microscope coupled with a new technique in the late 18th century unveiled the developing chick for close-up examination. By cutting a hole in the eggshell and covering it with another piece of shell, scientists were able to look directly into the egg while it continued to develop without dehydration. Soon studies of the developing chick identified the three embryonic germ layers: ectoderm, mesoderm and endoderm, giving rise to the field of embryology.

Host versus graft response was first described in the chicken embryo. James Murphy (biologist) (1914) found that rat tissues that could not grow in adult chickens survived in the developing chick. In an immunocompetent animal, like the mature chicken, the host immune cells attack the foreign tissue. Since the immune system of the chick is not functional until about day 14 of incubation, foreign tissue can grow. Eventually, Murphy showed that the acceptance of tissue grafts was host-specific in immunologically competent animals. [1] [2]

Culturing virus was once technically difficult. In 1931, Ernest Goodpasture and Alice Miles Woodruff developed a new technique that used chicken eggs to propagate a pox virus. [3] Building on their success, the chick was used to isolate the mumps virus for vaccine development and it is still used to culture some viruses and parasites today.

The ability of chicken embryonic nerves to infiltrate a mouse tumor suggested to Rita Levi-Montalcini that the tumor must produce a diffusible growth factor (1952). She identified Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) leading to the discovery of a large family of growth factors which are key regulators during normal development and disease processes including cancer. [4]

Adult chicken as a research model

The adult chicken has also made significant contributions to the advancement of science. By inoculating chickens with cholera bacteria (Pasteurella multocida) from an overgrown, and thereby attenuated, culture Louis Pasteur produced the first lab-derived attenuated vaccine (1860s). Great advances in immunology and oncology continued to characterize the 20th century, for which we indebted to the chicken model.

Peyton Rous (1879-1970) won the Nobel prize for discovering that viral infection of chicken could induce sarcoma (Rous, 1911). Steve Martin followed up on this work and identified a component of a chicken retrovirus, Src, which became the first known oncogene. J. Michael Bishop and Harold Varmus with their colleagues (1976) extended these findings to humans, showing that cancer causing oncogenes in mammals are induced by mutations to proto-oncogenes. [5] [6]

Discoveries in the chicken ultimately divided the adaptive immune response into antibody (B-cell) and cell-mediated (T-cell) responses. Chickens missing their bursa, an organ with an unknown function at the time, could not be induced to make antibodies. Through these experiments, Bruce Glick, correctly deduced that bursa was responsible for making the cells that produced antibodies. [7] Bursa cells were termed B-cells for Bursa to differentiate them from thymus derived T-cells.

Cancer

The chicken embryo is a unique model that overcomes many limitations to studying the biology of cancer in vivo. The chorioallantoic membrane (CAM), a well-vascularized extra-embryonic tissue located underneath the eggshell, has a successful history as a biological platform for the molecular analysis of cancer including viral oncogenesis, [8] carcinogenesis, [9] tumor xenografting, [1] [10] [11] [12] [13] tumor angiogenesis, [14] and cancer metastasis. [15] [16] [17] [18] Since the chicken embryo is naturally immunodeficient, the CAM readily supports the engraftment of both normal and tumor tissues. [18] The avian CAM successfully supports most cancer cell characteristics including growth, invasion, angiogenesis, and remodeling of the microenvironment. The chicken egg model can be also used to evaluate various adverse effects (e.g., genotoxicity, histopathologic changes) produced by environmental chemicals, including carcinogens [19] [20] [21] .

Genetics

The Gallus gallus genome was sequenced by Sanger shotgun sequencing [22] and mapped with extensive BAC contig-based physical mapping. [23] There are significant, fundamental similarities between the human and chicken genomes. However, differences between human and chicken genomes help to identify functional elements: the genes and their regulatory elements, which are most likely to be conserved through time. Publication of the chicken genome enables expansion of transgenic techniques for advancing research within the chick model system.[ citation needed ]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oncogene</span> Gene that has the potential to cause cancer

An oncogene is a gene that has the potential to cause cancer. In tumor cells, these genes are often mutated, or expressed at high levels.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Retrovirus</span> Family of viruses

A retrovirus is a type of virus that inserts a DNA copy of its RNA genome into the DNA of a host cell that it invades, thus changing the genome of that cell. After invading a host cell's cytoplasm, the virus uses its own reverse transcriptase enzyme to produce DNA from its RNA genome, the reverse of the usual pattern, thus retro (backward). The new DNA is then incorporated into the host cell genome by an integrase enzyme, at which point the retroviral DNA is referred to as a provirus. The host cell then treats the viral DNA as part of its own genome, transcribing and translating the viral genes along with the cell's own genes, producing the proteins required to assemble new copies of the virus. Many retroviruses cause serious diseases in humans, other mammals, and birds.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tumor suppressor gene</span> Gene that inhibits expression of the tumorigenic phenotype

A tumor suppressor gene (TSG), or anti-oncogene, is a gene that regulates a cell during cell division and replication. If the cell grows uncontrollably, it will result in cancer. When a tumor suppressor gene is mutated, it results in a loss or reduction in its function. In combination with other genetic mutations, this could allow the cell to grow abnormally. The loss of function for these genes may be even more significant in the development of human cancers, compared to the activation of oncogenes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Metastasis</span> Spread of a disease inside a body

Metastasis is a pathogenic agent's spread from an initial or primary site to a different or secondary site within the host's body; the term is typically used when referring to metastasis by a cancerous tumor. The newly pathological sites, then, are metastases (mets). It is generally distinguished from cancer invasion, which is the direct extension and penetration by cancer cells into neighboring tissues.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Harold E. Varmus</span> American scientist (born 1939)

Harold Eliot Varmus is an American Nobel Prize-winning scientist. He is currently the Lewis Thomas University Professor of Medicine at Weill Cornell Medicine and a senior associate at the New York Genome Center.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">J. Michael Bishop</span> American immunologist and microbiologist

John Michael Bishop is an American immunologist and microbiologist who shared the 1989 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine with Harold E. Varmus. He serves as an active faculty member at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), where he also served as chancellor from 1998 to 2009.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oncovirus</span> Viruses that can cause cancer

An oncovirus or oncogenic virus is a virus that can cause cancer. This term originated from studies of acutely transforming retroviruses in the 1950–60s, when the term oncornaviruses was used to denote their RNA virus origin. With the letters RNA removed, it now refers to any virus with a DNA or RNA genome causing cancer and is synonymous with tumor virus or cancer virus. The vast majority of human and animal viruses do not cause cancer, probably because of longstanding co-evolution between the virus and its host. Oncoviruses have been important not only in epidemiology, but also in investigations of cell cycle control mechanisms such as the retinoblastoma protein.

Carcinogenesis, also called oncogenesis or tumorigenesis, is the formation of a cancer, whereby normal cells are transformed into cancer cells. The process is characterized by changes at the cellular, genetic, and epigenetic levels and abnormal cell division. Cell division is a physiological process that occurs in almost all tissues and under a variety of circumstances. Normally, the balance between proliferation and programmed cell death, in the form of apoptosis, is maintained to ensure the integrity of tissues and organs. According to the prevailing accepted theory of carcinogenesis, the somatic mutation theory, mutations in DNA and epimutations that lead to cancer disrupt these orderly processes by interfering with the programming regulating the processes, upsetting the normal balance between proliferation and cell death. This results in uncontrolled cell division and the evolution of those cells by natural selection in the body. Only certain mutations lead to cancer whereas the majority of mutations do not.

Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) is a retrovirus and is the first oncovirus to have been described. It causes sarcoma in chickens.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Francis Peyton Rous</span> American scientist (1879–1970)

Francis Peyton Rous was an American pathologist at the Rockefeller University known for his works in oncoviruses, blood transfusion and physiology of digestion. A medical graduate from the Johns Hopkins University, he was discouraged from becoming a practicing physician due to severe tuberculosis. After three years of working as an instructor of pathology at the University of Michigan, he became dedicated researcher at the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research for the rest of his career.

v-Src is a gene found in Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) that encodes a tyrosine kinase that causes a type of cancer in chickens.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase Src</span> Mammalian protein found in humans

Proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase Src, also known as proto-oncogene c-Src, or simply c-Src, is a non-receptor tyrosine kinase protein that in humans is encoded by the SRC gene. It belongs to a family of Src family kinases and is similar to the v-Src gene of Rous sarcoma virus. It includes an SH2 domain, an SH3 domain and a tyrosine kinase domain. Two transcript variants encoding the same protein have been found for this gene.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Epithelioid sarcoma</span> Medical condition

Epithelioid sarcoma is a rare soft tissue sarcoma arising from mesenchymal tissue and characterized by epithelioid-like features. It accounts for less than 1% of all soft tissue sarcomas. It was first definitively characterized by F.M. Enzinger in 1970. It commonly presents itself in the distal limbs of young adults as a small, soft mass or a cluster of bumps. A proximal version has also been described, frequently occurring in the upper extremities. Less commonly, cases are reported in the pelvis, vulva, penis, and spine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Invadopodia</span>

Invadopodia are actin-rich protrusions of the plasma membrane that are associated with degradation of the extracellular matrix in cancer invasiveness and metastasis. Very similar to podosomes, invadopodia are found in invasive cancer cells and are important for their ability to invade through the extracellular matrix, especially in cancer cell extravasation. Invadopodia are generally visualized by the holes they create in ECM -coated plates, in combination with immunohistochemistry for the invadopodia localizing proteins such as cortactin, actin, Tks5 etc. Invadopodia can also be used as a marker to quantify the invasiveness of cancer cell lines in vitro using a hyaluronic acid hydrogel assay.

Avian sarcoma leukosis virus (ASLV) is an endogenous retrovirus that infects and can lead to cancer in chickens; experimentally it can infect other species of birds and mammals. ASLV replicates in chicken embryo fibroblasts, the cells that contribute to the formation of connective tissues. Different forms of the disease exist, including lymphoblastic, erythroblastic, and osteopetrotic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chorioallantoic membrane</span>

The chorioallantoic membrane (CAM), also known as the chorioallantois, is a highly vascularized membrane found in the eggs of certain amniotes like birds and reptiles. It is formed by the fusion of the mesodermal layers of two extra-embryonic membranes – the chorion and the allantois. It is the avian homologue of the mammalian placenta. It is the outermost extra-embryonic membrane which lines the non-vascular egg shell membrane.

Avian orthoreovirus, also known as avian reovirus, is an orthoreovirus from the Reoviridae family. Infection causes arthritis and tenosynovitis in poultry. It can also cause respiratory disease.

Peter K. Vogt is an American molecular biologist, virologist and geneticist. His research focuses on retroviruses and viral and cellular oncogenes.

The avian immune system is the system of biological structures and cellular processes that protects birds from disease.

Breast cancer metastatic mouse models are experimental approaches in which mice are genetically manipulated to develop a mammary tumor leading to distant focal lesions of mammary epithelium created by metastasis. Mammary cancers in mice can be caused by genetic mutations that have been identified in human cancer. This means models can be generated based upon molecular lesions consistent with the human disease.

References

  1. 1 2 Murphy, J. B. (1914). "Factors of resistance to heteroplastic tissue-grafting: Studies in tissue specificity Part III". Journal of Experimental Medicine. 19 (5): 513–522. doi:10.1084/jem.19.5.513. PMC   2125188 . PMID   19867789.
  2. Murphy, J. B. (1914). "Studies in tissue specificity Part II: The ultimate fate of mammalian tissue implanted in the chick embryo". Journal of Experimental Medicine. 19 (2): 181–186. doi:10.1084/jem.19.2.181. PMC   2125151 . PMID   19867756.
  3. Woodruff, A. M.; Goodpasture, E. W. (1931). "The Susceptibility of the Chorio-Allantoic Membrane of Chick Embryos to Infection with the Fowl-Pox Virus". American Journal of Pathology. 7 (3): 209–222. PMC   2062632 . PMID   19969963.
  4. Levi-Montalcini, R. (1952). "Effects of mouse tumor transplantation on the nervous system". Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 55 (2): 330–344. Bibcode:1952NYASA..55..330L. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1952.tb26548.x. PMID   12977049. S2CID   28931992.
  5. Stehelin, D.; Guntaka, R. V.; Varmus, H. E.; Bishop, J. M. (1976). "Purification of DNA complementary to nucleotide sequences required for neoplastic transformation of fibroblasts by avian sarcoma viruses". Journal of Molecular Biology. 101 (3): 349–365. doi:10.1016/0022-2836(76)90152-2. PMID   176368.
  6. Stehelin, D.; Varmus, H. E.; Bishop, J. M.; Vogt, P. K. (1976). "DNA related to the transforming gene(s) of avian sarcoma viruses is present in normal avian DNA". Nature. 260 (5547): 170–173. Bibcode:1976Natur.260..170S. doi:10.1038/260170a0. PMID   176594. S2CID   4178400.
  7. Glick, B.; Chang, T.S.; Jaap, R.G. (1956). "The bursa of Fabricius and antibody production". Poultry Science. 35: 224–225. doi: 10.3382/ps.0350224 .
  8. Rous, P. (1911). "A Sarcoma of the Fowl Transmissible by an Agent Separable from the Tumor Cells" (PDF). Journal of Experimental Medicine. 13 (4): 397–411. doi:10.1084/jem.13.4.397. PMC   2124874 . PMID   19867421.
  9. Bader, A. G.; Kang, S.; Vogt, P. K. (2006). "Cancer-specific mutations in PIK3CA are oncogenic in vivo". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 103 (5): 1475–1479. Bibcode:2006PNAS..103.1475B. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510857103 . PMC   1360603 . PMID   16432179.
  10. Dagg, C. P.; Karnofsky, D. A.; Toolan, H. W.; Roddy, J. (1954). "Serial passage of human tumors in chick embryo: growth inhibition by nitrogen mustard". Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. 87 (1). Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine: 223–227. doi:10.3181/00379727-87-21341. PMID   13224733. S2CID   42888074.
  11. Easty, G. C.; Easty, D. M.; Tchao, R. (1969). "The growth of heterologous tumour cells in chick embryos". European Journal of Cancer. 5 (3): 287–295. doi:10.1016/0014-2964(69)90079-6. PMID   5786070.
  12. Nicolson, G. L., Brunson, K. W. and Fidler, I. J. (1978) 'Specificity of arrest, survival, and growth of selected metastatic variant cell lines', Cancer Res 38(11 Pt 2) 4105-11.
  13. Ossowski, L.; Reich, E. (1983). "Changes in malignant phenotype of a human carcinoma conditioned by growth environment". Cell. 33 (2): 323–333. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90414-2 . PMID   6407756.
  14. Eliceiri, B. P.; Klemke, R.; Stromblad, S.; Cheresh, D. A. (1998). "Integrin αvβ3 requirement for sustained mitogen-activated protein kinase activity during angiogenesis". Journal of Cell Biology. 140 (5): 1255–1263. doi:10.1083/jcb.140.5.1255. PMC   2132684 . PMID   9490736.
  15. Chambers, A. F.; MacDonald, I. C.; Schmidt, E. E.; Morris, V. L.; Groom, A. C. (1998). "Preclinical assessment of anti-cancer therapeutic strategies using in vivo videomicroscopy". Cancer Metastasis Rev. 17 (3): 263–9. doi:10.1023/A:1006136428254. PMID   10352879. S2CID   24565818.
  16. Gordon, J. R.; Quigley, J. P. (1986). "Early spontaneous metastasis in the human epidermoid carcinoma HEp3/chick embryo model: contribution of incidental colonization". Int J Cancer. 38 (3): 437–44. doi:10.1002/ijc.2910380321. PMID   3744594. S2CID   35981930.
  17. Chambers, A. F.; MacDonald, I. C.; Schmidt, E. E.; Morris, V. L.; Groom, A. C. (1998). "Preclinical assessment of anti-cancer therapeutic strategies using in vivo videomicroscopy". Cancer and Metastasis Reviews. 17 (3): 263–269. doi:10.1023/A:1006136428254. PMID   10352879. S2CID   24565818.
  18. 1 2 Zijlstra, A.; Mellor, R.; Panzarella, G.; Aimes, R. T.; Hooper, J. D.; Marchenko, N. D.; Quigley, J. P. (2002). "A quantitative analysis of rate-limiting steps in the metastatic cascade using human-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction". Cancer Research. 62 (23): 7083–7092. PMID   12460930.
  19. Williams GM, Duan JD, Brunnemann KD, Iatropoulos MJ, Vock E, Deschl U. Chicken fetal liver DNA damage and adduct formation by activation-dependent DNA-reactive carcinogens and related compounds of several structural classes. Toxicol Sci. 2014;141(1):18-28. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfu123
  20. Kobets T, Duan JD, Vock E, Deschl U, Williams GM. Evaluation of Pharmaceuticals for DNA Damage in the Chicken Egg Genotoxicity Assay (CEGA). Int J Toxicol. 2022;41(4):297-311. doi:10.1177/10915818221093583
  21. Iatropoulos MJ, Kobets T, Duan JD, et al. Chicken egg fetal liver DNA and histopathologic effects of structurally diverse carcinogens and non-carcinogens. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2017;69(7):533-546. doi:10.1016/j.etp.2017.04.011
  22. Hillier, LaDeana W.; Miller, Webb; Birney, Ewan; et al. (2004). "Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution" (PDF). Nature. 432 (7018): 695–716. Bibcode:2004Natur.432..695C. doi: 10.1038/nature03154 . PMID   15592404. S2CID   4405203.
  23. Wong, G. K.; et al. (2004). "A genetic variation map for chicken with 2.8 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms". Nature. 432 (7018): 717–722. Bibcode:2004Natur.432..717B. doi:10.1038/nature03156. PMC   2263125 . PMID   15592405.