Chiquihuite cave

Last updated

Chiquihuite Cave is a possible Upper Paleolithic archaeological site in the Astillero Mountains, Zacatecas State, in North-Central Mexico. Chiquihuite Cave may be evidence of early human presence in the Western Hemisphere up to 33,000 years ago. It is located 2,740 meters (9000 feet) above sea level and about 1 kilometer higher than the valley below. [1] Stones discovered here, thought to be lithic artifacts, have been dated to 26,000 years ago based on more than 50 samples of animal bone and charcoal found in association with these stones. [2] However, there is scholarly debate over whether the stones are truly artifacts, human-made tools that are evidence of human presence, or if they were formed naturally. [3] [4] No evidence of human DNA or hearth have been unearthed. [5]

Contents

Excavation history

Excavations were started in 2012, when a test pit unearthed unusual stones believed to be artifacts. Further excavations were carried out in an expanded 3-meter-deep excavation unit in 2016 and 2017 under the leadership of Ciprian Ardelean of the Autonomous University of Zacatecas (Mexico). [6] Ardelean's team recovered 1,930 stone artifacts from the cave. Evidence of wind-blown sediment indicates that these artifacts could have moved horizontally, but not vertically through stratigraphic layers used to date them. The researchers obtained 46 radiocarbon dates from bone, charcoal, and sediment samples. They found six more dates using luminescence dating. The dates indicate that the artifacts were used and discarded about 26,000 years ago. [1]

In addition to analyzing the stone artifacts, Ardelean's team used pollen analysis and DNA extractions to find if early humans had been present in the cave. [1]

Evidence of early humans

Many of the stones found in Chiquihuite Cave are believed to be artifacts, specifically human-made tools. Almost 30 percent of the tools show signs of usage around the edges. They are made of black and green limestone. The use of limestone indicates human selectivity because of its availability near the cave but not within it. The shape of many of the artifacts also suggest that they were flaked using human tools such as wooden or bone hammers. Ardelean considers some of the artifacts to be transversal points, suggesting that they were made using microlithic technology. This technology differentiates the artifacts from similar ones found at nearby sites. [1]

Researchers also considered environmental data. They found palm phytoliths in all samples from inside the cave. It is unlikely that the palm phytoliths were naturally present in the cave based on the high altitude. It is more likely that they are remnants of plants brought into the cave by early humans. [1]

DNA from a wide range of animals was found in the cave, including black bears, [7] rodents, bats, voles, and even kangaroo rats. DNA sequencing indicates that an ancestor of the American black bear was present in the cave 16,000 years ago and a now-extinct giant short-faced bear was in the cave 13,000 years ago. No human DNA was found. The chances of finding human DNA in the cave were low, so human presence should not be ruled out because of this factor. [1]

The site is lacking in cultural evidence of humans, making archaeologists conclude that the site was visited only occasionally by bands of hunter-gatherers; perhaps it was used as a refuge during particularly severe weather. Evidence indicates that the cave was in use for approximately 16,000 years. [8] If that is correct, Chiquihuite Cave serves as significant evidence that humans were adapted to living in high altitude mountainous areas much earlier than previously thought. [1]

Regional context

According to the scientists involved in this research, recent investigations have uncovered good evidence of a human presence during the Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene epochs in other parts of Mexico, too. They refer to “the northwest region of Mexico, the Chiapas Highlands, Central Mexico, and the Caribbean coast”. This new research pushes back “dates for human dispersal to the region possibly as early as 33,000–31,000 years ago”. [1]

Other sites in the Western Hemisphere including Bluefish Caves in Canada and the Santa Elina shelter in Brazil (es:Abrigo de Santa Elina) [9] have yielded similar dates to Chiquihuite. [10] Transversal points similar to those found in Chiquihuite Cave are common at Pleistocene sites in South America including the Toca da Tira Peia, Toca da Pena (Serra da Capivara National Park), and Toca da Janela da Barra do Antonião-Norte sites in Brazil. [11]

Controversy

Scholars disagree over the significance of the excavations at Chiquihuite Cave. In 2021, a team of researchers headed by James Chatters of Central Washington University concluded that if the dating of the Chiquihuite site were accurate, the population present would have had to have been completely invisible to genetic studies and contributed no genes to ancestral Native Americans. Additionally, the potential artifacts were called into question, with the researchers suggesting that they are likely geofacts created as the result of natural processes. [12] He found that the slope of limestone pointing towards the mouth of the cave could have caused a natural deposit of stone, which would be naturally flaked during the fall, to appear like artifacts. Furthermore, Ardelean's data indicates that limestone could have been produced from the cave wall. Chatters also believes that blade cores and tertiary flakes would be found near the site if the tools were created by human flaking. [13] Kurt Rademaker, another member of the team, found the images of the proposed tools to lack chipping around the edge which is usually common on stone tools. [14]

Chatters raised a number of concerns about the work done by Ardelean at Chiquihuite Cave. He claims that there was not enough detail provided on how the lithic analysis was conducted. He also recommends that Ardelean should have excavated at the mouth of the cave where humans were more likely to have been rather than deep inside the cave. Finally, Chatters found that the human behaviors at Chiquihuite Cave, namely the diet shown through faunal analysis and patterns of usage of such an inaccessible area, are incompatible with previous scientific understandings of early humans. [13]

Ardelean has responded to this critique with an article defending his argument. He further analyzed ten of the stone tools with special attention to evidence of flake technology and use-wear. [15] He remains confident that 239 tools from the lowest layer were locked beneath a layer of mud and were therefore dated properly. Furthermore, the tools may even indicate that a beginner was learning how to flake from an expert based on marks on the artifacts. [14]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Beringia</span> Geographic region of Asia and North America currently partly submerged

Beringia is defined today as the land and maritime area bounded on the west by the Lena River in Russia; on the east by the Mackenzie River in Canada; on the north by 72 degrees north latitude in the Chukchi Sea; and on the south by the tip of the Kamchatka Peninsula. It includes the Chukchi Sea, the Bering Sea, the Bering Strait, the Chukchi and Kamchatka Peninsulas in Russia as well as Alaska in the United States and the Yukon in Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Acheulean</span> Archaeological culture associated with Homo erectus

Acheulean, from the French acheuléen after the type site of Saint-Acheul, is an archaeological industry of stone tool manufacture characterized by the distinctive oval and pear-shaped "hand axes" associated with Homo erectus and derived species such as Homo heidelbergensis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oldowan</span> Archaeological culture

The Oldowan was a widespread stone tool archaeological industry (style) in prehistory. These early tools were simple, usually made with one or a few flakes chipped off with another stone. Oldowan tools were used during the Lower Paleolithic period, 2.9 million years ago up until at least 1.7 million years ago (Ma), by ancient Hominins across much of Africa. This technological industry was followed by the more sophisticated Acheulean industry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mousterian</span> European Middle Paleolithic culture

The Mousterian is an archaeological industry of stone tools, associated primarily with the Neanderthals in Europe, and to the earliest anatomically modern humans in North Africa and West Asia. The Mousterian largely defines the latter part of the Middle Paleolithic, the middle of the West Eurasian Old Stone Age. It lasted roughly from 160,000 to 40,000 BP. If its predecessor, known as Levallois or Levallois-Mousterian, is included, the range is extended to as early as c. 300,000–200,000 BP. The main following period is the Aurignacian of Homo sapiens.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Clovis point</span> New World prehistoric projectile

Clovis points are the characteristically fluted projectile points associated with the New World Clovis culture, a prehistoric Paleo-American culture. They are present in dense concentrations across much of North America and they are largely restricted to the north of South America. There are slight differences in points found in the Eastern United States bringing them to sometimes be called "Clovis-like". Clovis points date to the Early Paleoindian period, with all known points dating from roughly 13,400–12,700 years ago. As an example, Clovis remains at the Murry Springs Site date to around 12,900 calendar years ago. Clovis fluted points are named after the city of Clovis, New Mexico, where examples were first found in 1929 by Ridgely Whiteman.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Clovis culture</span> Prehistoric culture in the Americas c. 11, 500 to 10,800 BCE

Clovis culture is a prehistoric Paleoamerican archaeological culture, named for distinct stone and bone tools found in close association with Pleistocene fauna, particularly two Columbian mammoths, at Blackwater Locality No. 1 near Clovis, New Mexico, in 1936 and 1937, though Paleoindian artifacts had been found at the site since the 1920s. It existed from roughly 11,500 to 10,800 BCE near the end of the Last Glacial Period.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Levallois technique</span> Distinctive type of stone knapping technique used by ancient humans

The Levallois technique is a name given by archaeologists to a distinctive type of stone knapping developed around 250,000 to 300,000 years ago during the Middle Palaeolithic period. It is part of the Mousterian stone tool industry, and was used by the Neanderthals in Europe and by modern humans in other regions such as the Levant.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Meadowcroft Rockshelter</span> Archaeological site near Avella, Pennsylvania, United States

The Meadowcroft Rockshelter is an archaeological site which is located near Avella in Jefferson Township, Pennsylvania. The site is a rock shelter in a bluff overlooking Cross Creek, and contains evidence that the area may have been continually inhabited for more than 19,000 years. If accurately dated, it would be one of the earliest known sites with evidence of a human presence and continuous human occupation in the New World.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Middle Stone Age</span> Period in African prehistory

The Middle Stone Age was a period of African prehistory between the Early Stone Age and the Late Stone Age. It is generally considered to have begun around 280,000 years ago and ended around 50–25,000 years ago. The beginnings of particular MSA stone tools have their origins as far back as 550–500,000 years ago and as such some researchers consider this to be the beginnings of the MSA. The MSA is often mistakenly understood to be synonymous with the Middle Paleolithic of Europe, especially due to their roughly contemporaneous time span; however, the Middle Paleolithic of Europe represents an entirely different hominin population, Homo neanderthalensis, than the MSA of Africa, which did not have Neanderthal populations. Additionally, current archaeological research in Africa has yielded much evidence to suggest that modern human behavior and cognition was beginning to develop much earlier in Africa during the MSA than it was in Europe during the Middle Paleolithic. The MSA is associated with both anatomically modern humans as well as archaic Homo sapiens, sometimes referred to as Homo helmei. Early physical evidence comes from the Gademotta Formation in Ethiopia, the Kapthurin Formation in Kenya and Kathu Pan in South Africa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pedra Furada</span> Collection of archaeological sites in Brazil

Pedra Furada is an important collection of over 800 archaeological sites in the state of Piauí, Brazil. These include hundreds of rock paintings dating from circa 12,000 years before present. More importantly, charcoal from very ancient fires and stone shards that may be interpreted as tools found at the location were dated from 48,000 to 32,000 years before present, suggesting the possibility of a human presence tens of thousand of years prior to the arrival of the Clovis people in North America.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Windust Caves Archaeological District</span> Historic district in Washington, United States

The Windust Caves (45-FR-46) are a series of nine caves eroded into a basalt cliff on the north side of the lower Snake River in Franklin County, southeastern Washington. The caves were excavated from 1959 until 1961 by a crew led by Harvey S. Rice. The site contains cultural artifacts dating back over 10,000 years and is culturally associated with other sites in the Columbia Basin.

Howiesons Poort is a technological and cultural period characterized by material evidence with shared design features found in South Africa, Lesotho, and Namibia. It was named after the Howieson's Poort Shelter archaeological site near Grahamstown in South Africa, where the first assemblage of these tools was discovered. Howiesons Poort is believed, based on chronological comparisons between many sites, to have started around 64.8 thousand years ago and ended around 59.5 thousand years ago. It is considered to be a technocomplex, or a cultural period in archaeology classified by distinct and specific technological materials. Howiesons Poort is notable for its relatively complex tools, technological innovations, and cultural objects evidencing symbolic expression. One site in particular, Sibudu Cave, provides one of the key reference sequences for Howiesons Poort. Howiesons Poort assemblages are primarily found at sites south of the Limpopo River.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Buttermilk Creek complex</span> Early archaeological site in Texas, United States

The Buttermilk Creek complex is the remains of a paleolithic settlement along the shores of Buttermilk Creek in present-day Salado, Texas, dated to approximately 15,500 years old. If confirmed, the site represents evidence of human settlement in the Americas that pre-dates the Clovis culture.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Huaca Prieta</span> Archaeological site in Peru

Huaca Prieta is the site of a prehistoric settlement beside the Pacific Ocean in the Chicama Valley, just north of Trujillo, La Libertad Province, Peru. It is a part of the El Brujo Archaeological Complex, which also includes Moche (culture) sites.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Toca da Tira Peia</span> Rock shelter archaeological site in Brazil

Toca da Tira Peia is a rock shelter site, located in the municipality Coronel José Dias, Piauí state, near the Serra da Capivara National Park, Brazil, thought to hold evidence of prehistoric human presence in South America dating to 22,000 years ago.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Archaic humans in Southeast Asia</span>

The region of Southeast Asia is considered a possible place for the evidence of archaic human remains that could be found due to the pathway between Australia and mainland Southeast Asia, where the migration of multiple early humans has occurred out of Africa. One of many pieces of evidence is of the early human found in central Java of Indonesia in the late 19th century by Eugene Dubois, and later in 1937 at Sangiran site by G.H.R. van Koenigswald. These skull and fossil materials are Homo erectus, named Pithecanthropus erectus by Dubois and Meganthropus palaeojavanicus by van Koenigswald. They were dated to c. 1.88 and 1.66 Ma, as suggested by Swisher et al. by analysis of volcanic rocks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peopling of the Americas</span> Prehstoric migration from Asia to the Americas

The peopling of the Americas began when Paleolithic hunter-gatherers (Paleo-Indians) entered North America from the North Asian Mammoth steppe via the Beringia land bridge, which had formed between northeastern Siberia and western Alaska due to the lowering of sea level during the Last Glacial Maximum. These populations expanded south of the Laurentide Ice Sheet and spread rapidly southward, occupying both North and South America, by 12,000 to 14,000 years ago. The earliest populations in the Americas, before roughly 10,000 years ago, are known as Paleo-Indians. Indigenous peoples of the Americas have been linked to Siberian populations by linguistic factors, the distribution of blood types, and in genetic composition as reflected by molecular data, such as DNA.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chesowanja</span> Quaternary archaeological site in Kenya

Chesowanja is a Kenian archaeological site located in the north of the Kenya Rift Valley, east of Lake Baringo. The Chesowanja sites consist of quaternary sediments. The sites are home to various discoveries like fossils, evidence of human activity over a period of 2 million years and the remains of Australopithecus. Also, artefacts belonging to Oldowan technology, Acheulean tradition and later stone industries have been found.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fishtail projectile point</span> Type of projectile point used in South America during the Late Pleistocene

Fishtail points, also known as Fell points are a style of Paleoindian projectile point widespread in South America at the end of the Late Pleistocene. Their chronological timing is disputed, with some authors favouring a short chronology spanning 12,800–12,200 years Before Present (BP), while others favouring a long chronology spanning 13,500–10,200 years BP. It is the earliest widespread lithic style in South America, being contemporaneous in its earlier stages to the use of Clovis points in North America. Fishtail points may be derived from Clovis points, or possibly from Fishtail-like points found on the Gulf Coast of North America and in Central America.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Ardelean, Ciprian F.; Becerra-Valdivia, Lorena; Pedersen, Mikkel Winther; Schwenninger, Jean-Luc; Oviatt, Charles G.; Macías-Quintero, Juan I.; Arroyo-Cabrales, Joaquin; Sikora, Martin; Ocampo-Díaz, Yam Zul E.; Rubio-Cisneros, Igor I.; Watling, Jennifer G.; de Medeiros, Vanda B.; De Oliveira, Paulo E.; Barba-Pingarón, Luis; Ortiz-Butrón, Agustín; Blancas-Vázquez, Jorge; Rivera-González, Irán; Solís-Rosales, Corina; Rodríguez-Ceja, María; Gandy, Devlin A.; Navarro-Gutierrez, Zamara; De La Rosa-Díaz, Jesús J.; Huerta-Arellano, Vladimir; Marroquín-Fernández, Marco B.; Martínez-Riojas, L. Martin; López-Jiménez, Alejandro; Higham, Thomas; Willerslev, Eske (2020). "Evidence of human occupation in Mexico around the Last Glacial Maximum". Nature. 584 (7819): 87–92. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2509-0. ISSN   0028-0836. PMID   32699412. S2CID   256819465.
  2. ↑ Geggel, Laura (July 22, 2020). "First Americans may have arrived to the continent 30,000 years ago". livescience.com. Retrieved September 16, 2023.
  3. ↑ Costopoulos, Andre (November 10, 2021). "30ky old archaeological material at Chiquihuite Cave, round 2: It still doesn't matter how much some of the objects look like stone tools". ArcheoThoughts. Retrieved September 16, 2023.
  4. ↑ Chatters, James C.; Potter, Ben A.; Prentiss, Anna Marie; Fiedel, Stuart J.; Haynes, Gary; Kelly, Robert L.; Kilby, J. David; Lanoë, François; Holland-Lulewicz, Jacob; Miller, D. Shane; Morrow, Juliet E.; Perri, Angela R.; Rademaker, Kurt M.; Reuther, Joshua D.; Ritchison, Brandon T.; Sanchez, Guadalupe; Sánchez-Morales, Ismael; Spivey-Faulkner, S. Margaret; Tune, Jesse W.; Haynes, C. Vance (October 23, 2021). "Evaluating Claims of Early Human Occupation at Chiquihuite Cave, Mexico". PaleoAmerica. Informa UK Limited. 8 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1080/20555563.2021.1940441. ISSN   2055-5563. S2CID   239853925.
  5. ↑ https://www.science.org/content/article/were-humans-living-mexican-cave-during-last-ice-age
  6. ↑ Brian Handwerk, Discovery in Mexican Cave May Drastically Change the Known Timeline of Humans' Arrival to the Americas. JULY 22, 2020 SMITHSONIANMAG.COM
  7. ↑ Gamillo, Elizabeth. "Using Only Trace Amounts of Poop in Soil Samples, Researchers Sequenced Entire Genomes of Two Ancient Bear Species". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 2022-01-30.
  8. ↑ Curry, Andrew (2020). "Were humans living in a Mexican cave during the last ice age?". Science. doi:10.1126/science.abd9583. ISSN   0036-8075. S2CID   225373809.
  9. ↑ Vialou, Denis; Benabdelhadi, Mohammed; Feathers, James; Fontugne, Michel; Vialou, Agueda Vilhena (2017). "Peopling South America's centre: the late Pleistocene site of Santa Elina". Antiquity. Antiquity Publications. 91 (358): 865–884. doi: 10.15184/aqy.2017.101 . ISSN   0003-598X.
  10. ↑ Steeves, Paulette F. C. (2021). The Indigenous Paleolithic of the Western Hemisphere. University of Nebraska Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctv1s5nzn7. ISBN   978-1-4962-0217-8. JSTOR   j.ctv1s5nzn7. S2CID   241930357.
  11. ↑ Boëda, Eric; Gruhn, Ruth; Vialou, Agueda Vilhena; Aschero, Carlos; Vialou, Denis; Pino, Mario; Gluchy, Maria; Pérez, Antonio; Ramos, Marcos Paulo (2021-01-02). "The Chiquihuite Cave, a Real Novelty? Observations about the Still-ignored South American Prehistory". PaleoAmerica. 7 (1): 1–7. doi:10.1080/20555563.2020.1851500. ISSN   2055-5563. S2CID   230533453.
  12. ↑ Blaschke, Jayme. "Early Chiquihuite Cave 'artifacts' likely natural in origin". Texas State University. Retrieved 30 November 2021.
  13. 1 2 Chatters, James C.; Potter, Ben A.; Prentiss, Anna Marie; Fiedel, Stuart J.; Haynes, Gary; Kelly, Robert L.; Kilby, J. David; Lanoë, François; Holland-Lulewicz, Jacob; Miller, D. Shane; Morrow, Juliet E. (2022-01-02). "Evaluating Claims of Early Human Occupation at Chiquihuite Cave, Mexico". PaleoAmerica. 8 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1080/20555563.2021.1940441. ISSN   2055-5563. S2CID   239853925.
  14. 1 2 Barras, Colin (2020-07-22). "Controversial cave discoveries suggest humans reached Americas much earlier than thought". Nature. 583 (7818): 670–671. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-02190-y. PMID   32699369. S2CID   220718521.
  15. ↑ Ardelean, Ciprian F.; Pedersen, Mikkel W.; Schwenninger, Jean-Luc; Arroyo-Cabrales, Joaquín; Gandy, Devlin A.; Sikora, Martin; Macías-Quintero, Juan I.; Huerta-Arellano, Vladimir; De La Rosa-Díaz, Jesús J.; Ocampo-Díaz, Yam Zul E.; Rubio-Cisneros, Igor I. (2022-01-02). "Chiquihuite Cave and America's Hidden Limestone Industries: A Reply to Chatters et al". PaleoAmerica. 8 (1): 17–28. doi:10.1080/20555563.2021.1985063. ISSN   2055-5563. S2CID   239877807.

Bibliography

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.