Chiragov and Others v. Armenia

Last updated
European Court of Human Rights Strasbourg- European Court of Human Rights.jpg
European Court of Human Rights

Chiragov v. Armenia was an international human rights case regarding the rights to property of Azeri nationals in the Nagorno-Karabakh region of former Soviet Azerbaijan. [1] The judgment of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights on the case originated in an application (no. 13216/05) against the Republic of Armenia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms by six Azerbaijani nationals on 6 April 2005. The applicants alleged, [2] in particular, that they were prevented from returning to the district of Lachin in territory occupied by the respondent Government, that they were thus unable to enjoy their property and homes located there, and that they had not received any compensation for their losses.

Contents

Chiragov and others v. Armenia, and a similar case, Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan , were the first cases of civilians affected by the conflict, who attempted to obtain compensation for the harm caused to their life and livelihood by applying to the ECHR. The Grand Chamber issued judgments on both cases on the same day and in both cases ruled in favour of the applicants and against the respective governments. It also underlined the responsibility of Armenia and Azerbaijan to find a resolution to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. [3]

Introduction

The applicants have said that they belong to the Azerbaijani Kurdish ethnicity. They have lived in the district of Lachin until the Armenian occupation. They have stated that they have been forced to leave their land, and to flee to Baku. There have been 6 applicants in the case: 1. Mr Elkhan Chiragov; 2. Mr Adishirin Chiragov; 3. Mr Ramiz Gebrayilov; 4. Mr Akif Hasanof; 5. Mr Fekhreddin Pashayev; 6. Mr Qaraca Gabrayilov.

The applicants asserted that they could not access to their individual properties located in the district of Lachin occupied by the respondent Government (Armenia). They further stated that the respondent Government prevents them to return to their home, and did not ensure any compensation for their losses. They interpreted these actions of the Government as continuing violations of Article 1 of Protocol 1 ("protection of property") to the Convention, Articles 8 ("right to respect for private and family life"), 13 ("right to an effective remedy"), and 14 ("prohibition of discrimination") of the Convention.

The Azerbaijani Government asked to intervene in the proceedings under Article 36 (1) ("third party intervention") of the Convention. The right of the Azerbaijani Government to intervene in the case as a third party has been satisfied by the Court, and Mr. C. Asgarov, Agent of the Government, represented the Azerbaijani Government during the proceedings.

Proofs of Applicants

The applicants claimed that the Armenian Government occupied the territories of Azerbaijan, and therefore, the Government is responsible for the violation of their rights. They submitted the following proofs:

  1. The reports of documents of the Human Rights Watch (HRW) affirms that the military forces of the Republic of Armenia involved in the occupation of Nagorno-Karabakh and the surrounding territories. The HRW stated that Armenian army troop in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, and this made Armenia a party of the conflict. Therefore, the conflict is an international armed conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan under international law. [4]
  2. The official statements by various authorities confirm that Armenia occupied the Nagorno-Karabakh and surrounding territories. For example, Mr Robert Kocharyan, former President and Prime Minister of Armenia, and "NKR," said that Armenia supplied anti-aircraft weapons to Nagorno-Karabakh while interviewing with the Armenian newspaper "Golos Armenii" in February 1994. Additionally, Mr Vazgen Manukyan, former Armenian Minister of Defence, admitted that statements that Armenia not to participate in the war are for foreign consumption, not true while interviewing with British journalist and writer Thomas de Waal in October 2000. [5]
  3. The annual reports of the International Institute for Strategic Studies repeatedly revealed that most of the military personnel present in Nagorno-Karabakh is from Armenia, and "Armenia has controlled most of Nagorno-Karabakh, and also seven adjacent regions of Azerbaijan." [6]
  4. Mr David Atkinson, rapporteur of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, indicated in his report that individuals living in Nagorno-Karabakh have passports of Armenia, soldiers from Armenia have been stationed in the region and they have been fighting. Mr Rapporteur further stated that the Armenian Government transfers great financial resources to this area. Based on the report, Parliamentary Assembly adopted the resolution 1416 on 25 January 2005. The Assembly affirmed that Nagorno-Karabakh has been occupied by Armenia, and this means that Armenia has violated its obligations as a member of the Council of Europe. The Assembly affirmed "the right of displaced persons to return their homes safely and with dignity." [7]
  5. Mr Vartan Oskanyan, former foreign minister of Armenia, stated that Armenia controls the occupied territories while interviewing with the Austrian newspaper "Der Standard."
  6. United Nations General Assembly approved a resolution on "The Situation in the occupied territories of Azerbaijan" (A/Res/62/243). The Assembly recalled and reminded four binding resolution of the United Nations Security Council, and requested all Armenian forces to withdraw from all occupied territories of Azerbaijan. The Assembly affirmed the inalienable right of the persons displaced from the occupied territories to return to their homes. [8]
  7. On 29 October 2008, Mr Jirayr Sefilyan, Armenian military commander and political figure, stated that armed forces in Nagorno Karabakh, and politicians in the region are sent by the central Armenian Government, and budget of the territory is financed by Armenia while interviewing with Armenia Today.
  8. On 20 May 2010 the European Parliament adopted a Resolution on the need for an EU strategy for the South Caucasus. The Parliament demanded the withdrawal of Armenian forces from all occupied territories of Azerbaijan. In April 2012 the European Parliament approved another Resolution and expressed its deep concerns about "illegal activities exercised by Armenian troops on the occupied Azerbaijani territories." [9]

Responses of the Government

  1. The Armenian Government alleged that only 5 percent of the "NKR" defense forces is deployed by Armenia pursuant to Article 4 of the 1994 agreement. Additionally, the Government did not exclude the possibility that persons belong to Armenian nationality may serve in the "NKR" defense force on a contractual and voluntary basis.
  2. The Government asserted that "NKR" has its own judicial system, president, government, courts, parliament, and laws. Therefore, Armenia is not responsible for the violation of human rights in "NKR."
  3. The Government stated that the laws of Armenia, and "NKR" allow dual citizenship, and passports of Armenia are issued to "NKR" residents because of their travel to foreign countries.
  4. Armenia claimed that several currencies are used in "NKR" such as euros, US dollars, pounds, and Australian dollars, and therefore, Armenian dram is not main currency in the territory. [10]

Result

The Strasbourg Court ruled that Armenia exercises effective control over Nagorno-Karabakh and the surrounding territories, including the district of Lachin. The Court dismissed preliminary objections of Armenia based on the grounds of jurisdiction, the applicants' victim status, and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies. The Court rendered a judgement that Armenia has been continuing to violate Article 1 (Protection of property) of the Protocol No. 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights, Article 8 (Right to respect for private and family life) and Article 13 (Right to an effective remedy) of the Convention. [11] Armenia was ordered to pay 5,000 euros in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage to each of the applicants and a total amount of 28,642.87 pounds sterling for costs and expenses.

According to Laurence Broers, Research Associate at the SOAS Centre of Contemporary Central Asia and the Caucasus, through its ruling, the European Court of Human Rights acknowledged the ambivalence of the NKR's claim to a separate sovereignty. It found that Armenia effectively exercised extra-territorial jurisdiction sustaining the situation in Karabakh, overturning Armenia's arguments to the contrary and effectively affirming Azerbaijan's narrative of Armenia as an occupying power. [12]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nagorno-Karabakh</span> Geopolitical region in Azerbaijan

Nagorno-Karabakh is a region in Azerbaijan, covering the southeastern stretch of the Lesser Caucasus mountain range. Part of the greater region of Karabakh, it spans the area between Lower Karabakh and Syunik. Its terrain mostly consists of mountains and forestland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Republic of Artsakh</span> Former breakaway state in the South Caucasus

Artsakh, officially the Republic of Artsakh or the Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh, was a breakaway state in the South Caucasus whose territory was internationally recognised as part of Azerbaijan. Between 1991 and 2023, Artsakh controlled parts of the former Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast of the Azerbaijani Soviet Socialist Republic, including its capital Stepanakert. It had been an enclave within Azerbaijan from the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war until the 2023 Azerbaijani offensive, when the Azerbaijani military took control over the remaining territory controlled by Artsakh. Its only overland access route to Armenia after the 2020 war was via the 5 km (3.1 mi) wide Lachin corridor, which was placed under the supervision of Russian peacekeeping forces.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">First Nagorno-Karabakh War</span> 1988–1994 Armenia-Azerbaijan war

The First Nagorno-Karabakh War was an ethnic and territorial conflict that took place from February 1988 to May 1994, in the enclave of Nagorno-Karabakh in southwestern Azerbaijan, between the majority ethnic Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh backed by Armenia, and the Republic of Azerbaijan with support from Turkey. As the war progressed, Armenia and Azerbaijan, both former Soviet republics, entangled themselves in protracted, undeclared mountain warfare in the mountainous heights of Karabakh as Azerbaijan attempted to curb the secessionist movement in Nagorno-Karabakh.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nagorno-Karabakh conflict</span> 1988–2024 conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan

The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict was an ethnic and territorial conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan over the region of Nagorno-Karabakh, inhabited mostly by ethnic Armenians until 2023, and seven surrounding districts, inhabited mostly by Azerbaijanis until their expulsion during the 1990s. The Nagorno-Karabakh region was entirely claimed by and partially controlled by the breakaway Republic of Artsakh, but was recognized internationally as part of Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan gradually re-established control over Nagorno-Karabakh region and the seven surrounding districts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Foreign relations of Artsakh</span>

The Republic of Artsakh was a republic with limited recognition in the South Caucasus region. The Republic of Artsakh controlled most of the territory of the former Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast. It was recognized only by three other non-UN member states, Abkhazia, South Ossetia and Transnistria. The rest of the international community recognized Artsakh as part of Azerbaijan. In November 2012, a member of Uruguay's foreign relations committee stated that his country could recognize Nagorno-Karabakh's independence. In 2012, Armenia and Tuvalu established diplomatic relations, which led to speculation of possible recognition of Artsakh by Tuvalu. In October 2012, the Australian state of New South Wales recognized Nagorno-Karabakh. In September 2014, the Basque Parliament in Spain adopted a motion supporting Artsakh's right to self-determination and in November 2014, the Parliament of Navarre, also in Spain, issued a statement supporting Artsakh's inclusion in taking part in settlement negotiations.

The Battle of Kalbajar took place in March and April 1993, during the First Nagorno-Karabakh War. It resulted in the capture of the Kalbajar District of Azerbaijan by Armenian military forces.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lachin</span> Place in Azerbaijan

Lachin is a town in Azerbaijan and the administrative centre of the Lachin District. It is located within the strategic Lachin corridor, which linked the disputed region of Nagorno-Karabakh with Armenia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Administrative divisions of the Republic of Artsakh</span> Political subdivisions of the Republic of Artsakh

The administrative divisions of the Republic of Artsakh were of two types; provinces and cities. There were six provinces and one special administrative city.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Nations Security Council Resolution 874</span> United Nations resolution adopted in 1993

United Nations Security Council resolution 874, adopted unanimously on 14 October 1993, reaffirmed sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Azerbaijani Republic and of all other States in the region, called for the preservation of the ceasefire, cessation of hostilities and withdrawal of forces from recently occupied districts of the Republic of Azerbaijan, and reaffirmed resolutions 822 (1993) and 853 (1993). The Council expressed its concern at "...the conflict in and around the Nagorny Karabakh region of the Azerbaijani Republic, and of the tensions between the Republic of Armenia and the Azerbaijani Republic...", and called upon the parties to observe the ceasefire agreed with by the government of Russia and OSCE Minsk Group.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Outline of the Republic of Artsakh</span> Overview of and topical guide to the Republic of Artsakh

The following outline is provided as an overview and topical guide of the Republic of Artsakh and Nagorno-Karabakh region:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Armenian-occupied territories surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh</span> Formerly occupied territories of Azerbaijan

The Armenian-occupied territories surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh were areas of Azerbaijan, situated around the former Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast (NKAO), which were occupied by the ethnic Armenian military forces of the breakaway Republic of Artsakh with military support from Armenia, from the end of the First Nagorno-Karabakh War (1988–1994) to 2020, when the territories were returned to Azerbaijani control by military force or handed over in accordance to the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh ceasefire agreement. The surrounding regions were seized by Armenians under the justification of a "security belt" which was to be traded for recognition of autonomous status from Azerbaijan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lachin corridor</span> Mountain pass linking Armenia with Nagorno-Karabakh

The Lachin corridor is a mountain road in Azerbaijan that links Armenia and Karabakh.

Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly (PACE) Resolution 1416 (2005), titled “The conflict over the Nagorno-Karabakh region dealt with by the OSCE Minsk Conference”, is a resolution of PACE about the situation on occupied territories currently in the possession of Azerbaijan by Armenian military forces, adopted by PACE on January 25, 2005.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Political status of Nagorno-Karabakh</span> Status of a disputed region in the Caucasus

The political status of Nagorno-Karabakh remained unresolved from its declaration of independence from the Soviet Union on 10 December 1991, to its September 2023 collapse. During Soviet times, it had been an ethnic Armenian autonomous oblast of the Azerbaijan Soviet Socialist Republic. Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, a conflict arose between local Armenians who sought to have Nagorno-Karabakh join Armenia and local Azerbaijanis who opposed this.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2016 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict</span> April 2016 conflict in the territory of Nagorno-Karabakh

The 2016 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, also known as the Four-Day War, April War, or April clashes, began along the former Nagorno-Karabakh line of contact on 1 April 2016 with the Artsakh Defence Army, backed by the Armenian Armed Forces, on one side and the Azerbaijani Armed Forces on the other.

Azerbaijan has been a member of the Council of Europe, an international organization that focuses on strengthening democracy and human rights, since 2001. As a member, it has attracted attention for holding political prisoners, low implementation of verdicts of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), and bribing Council of Europe parliamentarians to suppress negative information about its human rights record. In 2017, the Committee of Ministers launched the first ever infringement proceeding against Azerbaijan after it refused to release opposition politician Ilgar Mammadov after a 2014 ECtHR verdict that his imprisonment was unlawful. There has also been criticism of Azerbaijan's continued membership by those who believe its lack of human rights protection undermines the credibility of the Council of Europe.

<i>Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan</i>

Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan was an international human rights case regarding the rights of Armenian refugees displaced from former Soviet Azerbaijan because of the conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh. The judgment of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights on the case originated in an application against the Republic of Azerbaijan lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms by Minas Sargsyan on 11 August 2006. He was forced to flee his home in the village of Gulistan in Shahumyan region of former Soviet Azerbaijan, together with his family, because of the Azerbaijani bombardments of the village and was not allowed to return and unable to get any compensation from the Azerbaijani authorities. Even though the applicant died in 2009, as did his widow, Lena Sargsyan, in 2014, his children, Vladimir and Tsovinar Sargsyan, represented him in court to continue the proceedings.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Armenia in the Council of Europe</span> International relations

Armenia has been a member of the Council of Europe, an international organization that focuses on strengthening democracy, human rights, and the rule of law across Europe, since 2001.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Blockade of Nagorno-Karabakh</span> Part of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict

The blockade of Nagorno-Karabakh was an event in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. The region was disputed between Azerbaijan and the breakaway Republic of Artsakh, internationally recognised as part of Azerbaijan, which had an ethnic Armenian population and was supported by neighbouring Armenia, until the dissolution of Republic of Artsakh on 28 September 2023.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flight of Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians</span> 2023 exodus from Nagorno-Karabakh

On 19–20 September 2023 Azerbaijan initiated a military offensive in the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh region which ended with the surrender of the self-declared Republic of Artsakh and the disbandment of its armed forces. Up until the military assault, the region was internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan but governed and populated by ethnic Armenians.

References

  1. ↑ "Beginning of the conflict". mfa.gov.az. Archived from the original on 2018-05-04. Retrieved 2018-09-25.
  2. ↑ "HUDOC - European Court of Human Rights". hudoc.echr.coe.int. Retrieved 2016-06-13.
  3. ↑ "ECHR rules on Karabakh-related Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan case". news.am. Retrieved 2022-08-19.
  4. ↑ "AZERBAIJAN Seven Years of Conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh" (PDF).
  5. ↑ Thomas de Waal (2003). Black Garden: Armenia and Azerbaijan through Peace and War. New York University Press. p. 210. ISBN   0-8147-6032-5.
  6. ↑ International Institute for Strategic Studies (2002). The Military Balance. Oxford University Press. pp. 66, 66, 82, 218.
  7. ↑ "No". www.assembly.coe.int. Retrieved 2017-10-23.
  8. ↑ "United Nations Official Document". www.un.org. Retrieved 2017-10-23.
  9. ↑ "Texts adopted - Thursday, 20 May 2010 - The need for an EU strategy for the South Caucasus - P7_TA(2010)0193". www.europarl.europa.eu. Retrieved 2017-10-23.
  10. ↑ "HUDOC - European Court of Human Rights". hudoc.echr.coe.int. Retrieved 2017-10-23.
  11. ↑ Refugees, United Nations High Commissioner for. "Refworld | Chiragov and Others v. Armenia". Refworld. Retrieved 2017-12-14.
  12. ↑ Laurence Broers (2 January 2024). "The Nagorno-Karabakh Republic: The life and death of an unrecognized state". Eurasianet . Retrieved 14 January 2024.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.