Saribekyan and Balyan v. Azerbaijan

Last updated
Saribekyan and Balayan v. Azerbaijan
Strasbourg- European Court of Human Rights.jpg
Court European Court of Human Rights
Decided30 January 2020
Citation(s) European Convention on Human Rights - Articles 2, 3, 13 and 14
Court membership
Judge(s) sittingAngelika Nußberger - President,

Yonko Grozev, Ganna Yudkivska, Síofra O’Leary, Mārtiņš Mits, Latif Huseynov,

Lado Chanturia

Contents

Saribekyan and Balyan v. Azerbaijan was an international human rights case filed by the parents of Manvel Saribekyan - an Armenian national from the Ttujur village in the Gegharkunik province of Armenia, who died while in captivity in Azerbaijan in 2010. The judgment of the European Court of Human Rights on the case originated in an application (no. 35746/11) against the Republic of Azerbaijan lodged with the Court under the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms on 10 June 2011.

The parents of Saribeyan alleged that their son was tortured and killed while in detention in Azerbaijan on the basis of ethnic hatred. On January 30, 2020, the Court ruled that Azerbaijan had violated Articles 2 and 3 of the Conversion (the right to life and the prohibition of torture), in the case of Manvel Saribekyan. The Court ordered the State of Azerbaijan to pay the parents of Manvel Saribekyan 60 thousand euros. [1]

Background

On September 11, 2010 a 20-years-old resident of the Armenian village of Ttujur bordering with Azerbaijan, Manvel Saribekyan, was captured by the Azerbaijani military near the Azerbaijani village of Zamanli. Saribekyan was accused of espionage and an attempt at a terrorist attack. In Armenia, Saribekyan's relatives said that in the morning of September 11, he had left the house to look for cattle and went missing. [2]

The following day the Azerbaijani authorities released a video of an interrogation in which Saribekyan confessed to being a member of a sabotage group, which, after crossing the border of Azerbaijan, had intended to blow up a school in Zamanli village. [3] In response, the Armenian Defense Ministry released a statement questioning the methods used by Azerbaijani authorities to obtain the confession, pointing to traces of torture seen on Saribekyan in the video. [4] [5]

On October 5, 2010, Manvel Saribekyan was found dead in his prison cell in Baku. The Azerbaijani authorities announced that he had committed suicide by hanging himself. The Armenian officials rejected the account of events given by Azerbaijan, the Armenian Foreign Minister Eduard Nalbandyan said: "The kidnapping of the young shepherd, making him speak obvious nonsense on TV through violence, and then killing him is terrible both in terms of the act and the degree of cynicism with which it was reported to the public. This way of acting is typical to terrorists: first abase a captive before a camera, then kill him". [6]

On October 5, 2010, the Armenian delegation issued a statement to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe signed by 26 members in which they strongly condemned the actions of the Azerbaijani authorities accusing them of violating articles two and three (unlawful execution and torture) of the European Convention on Human Rights, as well as the Geneva Conventions and other international laws. [7] [8]

Armenian officials also pointed out that representatives of the International Committee of the Red Cross, were denied access to Saribekyan while he was in custody, which was later confirmed by ICRC representative Ilaha Huseynova. [9]

After Saribekyan's body was repatriated to Armenia on November 4, 2010 the Press Service of the Prosecutor General of Armenia informed that the forensic examination had revealed signs of torture on the body and opened a criminal investigation. [10] The Armenian side sought legal assistance from Azerbaijan, but as no reply was received the investigation was suspended in December 2011. [11]

Trial at the European Court of Human Rights

Mamikon Saribekyan and Siranush Balyan filed a complaint with ECHR on 10 June 2011, in which they submitted that their son was tortured and killed while in detention in Azerbaijan, which violated Articles 2, 3, 13, 14 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

On January 30, 2020, the Court issued judgment on the case Saribekyan and Balyan v. Azerbaijan and recognized that the State of Azerbaijan had violated Articles 2 and 3 (right to life and the prohibition on torture). The Court did not investigate the violation of Articles 13 and 14 concerning the right to effective protection and the prohibition of discrimination, while recognizing that Azerbaijan's investigation of Saribekyan's death was inadequate in many aspects, including the consideration of the possible role of ethnic hatred.

The Court ruled that Azerbaijan had to pay 60,000 (EUR) to Artush Petrosyan in respect of non-pecuniary damage, and in accordance with Article 44 § 2 of the Convention and 2,200 (EUR) in respect of costs and expenses. [12]

One of the 7 judges on the case, the representative of Azerbaijan, Latif Huseynov, voted against the decision and expressed a dissenting opinion. In his opinion, the application should not have been considered, since the deadline of 6 months for filling an application was missed. [13]

Azerbaijan appealed this decision to the Grand Chamber of the Court. [14] The appeal was rejected. [15]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Convention on Human Rights</span> International treaty to protect human rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe

The European Convention on Human Rights is an international convention to protect human rights and political freedoms in Europe. Drafted in 1950 by the then newly formed Council of Europe, the convention entered into force on 3 September 1953. All Council of Europe member states are party to the convention and new members are expected to ratify the convention at the earliest opportunity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Extradition</span> Transfer of a suspect from one jurisdiction to another by law enforcement

In an extradition, one jurisdiction delivers a person accused or convicted of committing a crime in another jurisdiction, over to the other's law enforcement. It is a cooperative law enforcement procedure between the two jurisdictions and depends on the arrangements made between them. In addition to legal aspects of the process, extradition also involves the physical transfer of custody of the person being extradited to the legal authority of the requesting jurisdiction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Strappado</span> Torture method

The strappado, also known as corda, is a form of torture in which the victim's hands are tied behind his back and the victim is suspended by a rope attached to the wrists, typically resulting in dislocated shoulders. Weights may be added to the body to intensify the effect and increase the pain. This kind of torture would generally not last more than an hour without rest, as it would likely result in death.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri</span> Alleged al-Qaeda mastermind

Abd al-Rahim Hussein Muhammed Abdu al-Nashiri is a Saudi Arabian citizen alleged to be the mastermind of the bombing of USS Cole and other maritime attacks. He is alleged to have headed al-Qaeda operations in the Persian Gulf and the Gulf states prior to his capture in November 2002 by the CIA's Special Activities Division.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human rights in Azerbaijan</span> Overview of human rights in Azerbaijan

International organizations have frequently alleged that Azerbaijan has violated human rights standards established in international law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human rights in Armenia</span> Overview of human rights in Armenia

Human rights in Armenia tend to be better than those in most former Soviet republics and have drawn closer to acceptable standards, especially economically. Still, there are several considerable problems.

Russia incurred much international criticism for its conduct during the Second Chechen War, which started in 1999. The governments of the United States and other countries condemned deaths and expulsions among civilians. The United Nations Commission on Human Rights (UNHCR) passed two resolutions in 2000 and 2001 condemning human rights violations in Chechnya and requiring Russia to set up an independent national commission of inquiry to investigate the matter. However, a third resolution on these lines failed in 2004. The Council of Europe in multiple resolutions and statements between 2003 and 2007 called on Russia to cease human rights violations. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) between 2005 and 2007 conducted legal cases brought by Chechens against the Russian government, and in many of these cases held Russia responsible for deaths, disappearances and torture.

Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights provides a right to respect for one's "private and family life, his home and his correspondence", subject to certain restrictions that are "in accordance with law" and "necessary in a democratic society". The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) is an international treaty to protect human rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe.

Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights prohibits torture, and "inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment".

Article 3 – Prohibition of torture

No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bakhtiyar Hajiyev</span> Azerbaijani activist and blogger (born 1982)

Bakhtiyar Ilyas oglu Hajiyev is an Azerbaijani activist and blogger who served a prison sentence from 2011 to 2012 on charges of evading military service. His imprisonment was protested by numerous human rights organizations.

<i>Chiragov and Others v. Armenia</i> International human rights case

Chiragov v. Armenia was an international human rights case regarding the rights to property of Azeri nationals in the Nagorno-Karabakh region of former Soviet Azerbaijan. The judgment of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights on the case originated in an application against the Republic of Armenia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms by six Azerbaijani nationals on 6 April 2005. The applicants alleged, in particular, that they were prevented from returning to the district of Lachin in territory occupied by the respondent Government, that they were thus unable to enjoy their property and homes located there, and that they had not received any compensation for their losses.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zarema Gaisanova</span>

Zarema Gaisanova — is a human rights activist, a native Chechen. On October 31, 2009, Zarema Gaisanova was kidnapped in Chechen Capital of Grozny by group of armed men during a special operation headed by president of Chechen Republic, Ramzan Kadyrov. Zarema Gaisanova was a worker for Danish Refugee Council in Chechen Republic, and, according to Zarema Gaisanova's colleagues, she was abducted and probably murdered.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alexander Lapshin</span> Russian-Israeli travel-blogger and journalist

Alexander Valerievich Lapshin is a Soviet-born travel blogger and journalist. Lapshin holds Russian, Israeli, and Ukrainian citizenship. In 2016 Lapshin was arrested in Minsk at the request of the Azerbaijani authorities and extradited to Baku due to a visit to Nagorno-Karabakh. On May 20, 2021, the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg ruled on the blogger's complaint against the Republic of Azerbaijan, finding the country's authorities responsible for the illegal arrest, torture and attempted murder against Lapshin.

In September 1967, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the Netherlands brought the Greek case to the European Commission of Human Rights, alleging violations of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) by the Greek junta, which had taken power earlier that year. In 1969, the Commission found serious violations, including torture; the junta reacted by withdrawing from the Council of Europe. The case received significant press coverage and was "one of the most famous cases in the Convention's history", according to legal scholar Ed Bates.

In the case of Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy, before the European Court of Human Rights, the Grand Chamber of the Court found in February 2012 that by returning migrants to Libya, without examining their case, the state of Italy exposed the migrants to the risk of ill-treatment and amounted to a collective expulsion. The case concerned 24 migrants from Somalia end Eritrea that were travelling from Libya to Italy that were intercepted at sea by Italian authorities who sent them back to Libya.

Azerbaijan has been a member of the Council of Europe, an international organization that focuses on strengthening democracy and human rights, since 2001. As a member, it has attracted attention for holding political prisoners, low implementation of verdicts of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), and bribing Council of Europe parliamentarians to suppress negative information about its human rights record. In 2017, the Committee of Ministers launched the first ever infringement proceeding against Azerbaijan after it refused to release opposition politician Ilgar Mammadov after a 2014 ECtHR verdict that his imprisonment was unlawful. There has also been criticism of Azerbaijan's continued membership by those who believe its lack of human rights protection undermines the credibility of the Council of Europe.

<i>Karen Petrosyan v. Azerbaijan</i>

Karen Petrosyan v. Azerbaijan was an international human rights case regarding the rights of Artush Petrosyan and his son Karen Petrosyan – an Armenian national from Chinari village, Tavush province of Armenia, who died while in captivity in Azerbaijan in 2014. The judgment of the European Court of Human Rights on the case originated in an application against the Republic of Azerbaijan lodged with the Court under the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms by the applicant, Artush Petrosyan, on 25 April 2016. He Submitted that his son had been publicly humiliated, tortured and killed by decapitation by Azerbaijani State agents and that "his son’s body had not been repatriated in a timely manner, that there had been no effective investigation on and that the alleged violations had occurred as a result of discrimination based on ethnic origin".

Armenian prisoners of the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War are servicemen of the Defense Army of the Republic of Artsakh and the Armed Forces of the Republic of Armenia, as well as civilians and other detainees, who surrendered or were forcibly captured by the Azerbaijani Armed Forces during and after the conflict in 2020 between Azerbaijan and the self-proclaimed Republic of Artsakh together with Armenia in the disputed region of Nagorno-Karabakh and surrounding areas.

<i>Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan</i>

Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan was an international human rights case regarding the rights of Armenian refugees displaced from former Soviet Azerbaijan because of the conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh. The judgment of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights on the case originated in an application against the Republic of Azerbaijan lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms by Minas Sargsyan on 11 August 2006. He was forced to flee his home in the village of Gulistan in Shahumyan region of former Soviet Azerbaijan, together with his family, because of the Azerbaijani bombardments of the village and was not allowed to return and unable to get any compensation from the Azerbaijani authorities. Even though the applicant died in 2009, as did his widow, Lena Sargsyan, in 2014, his children, Vladimir and Tsovinar Sargsyan, represented him in court to continue the proceedings.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tartar Case</span> Large scale torture in Azerbaijan

The Tartar Case is a case of large scale torture that took place in Azerbaijan, dealing with Azerbaijani military personnel accused of treason in 2017 in the aftermath of the Nagorno-Karabakh war in April 2016. According to the authorities and human rights defenders, more than 400 people were subjected to torture in the course of the case. The Azerbaijani authorities claim one person was killed as a result, while human rights defenders say the number is about 13, and many were wrongfully convicted and given hefty prison sentences.

References

  1. ↑ "Azerbaijan Found Guilty In 2010 Death Of Armenian Captive". «Ազատ Եվրոպա/Ազատություն» ռադիոկայան (in Armenian). Retrieved 2021-12-23.
  2. ↑ "Manvel taken prisoner by Azerbaijani secret service". A1Plus. Retrieved 2021-12-20.
  3. ↑ "Armenian servicemen 'planned to blow up Azeri school'". AzerNews.az. 2010-09-18. Retrieved 2021-12-23.
  4. ↑ "Убийство гражданина Армении Манвела Сарибекяна - очередной пример азербайджанского терроризма: Налбандян". ИА REGNUM (in Russian). Retrieved 2021-12-20.
  5. ↑ "Saribekyan in Azerbaijan was Subjected to Torture: Defense Ministry | Epress.am". 2010-10-06. Retrieved 2021-12-20.
  6. ↑ LLC, Helix Consulting. "Way of acting typical to terrorists: MFA responds to Armenian youth's death in Azerbaijan". www.panorama.am. Retrieved 2021-12-20.
  7. ↑ "Heritage Party MP Postanjyan Circulates Statement at PACE Regarding Death of Armenian Shepherd in Azerbaijani Custody". Hetq.am. Retrieved 2021-12-20.
  8. ↑ "Baku's official version with respect to Armenian captive's death is cynical attempt to avoid responsibility". PanARMENIAN.Net. Retrieved 2021-12-20.
  9. ↑ "Tensions Rise After Armenian Dies in Azeri Custody". iwpr.net. Retrieved 2021-12-20.
  10. ↑ Узел, Кавказский. "GPO of Armenia: body of the captive delivered by Azerbaijan has traces of torture". Caucasian Knot. Retrieved 2021-12-20.
  11. ↑ "The authorities' ineffective investigation into the death of a prisoner violated the right to life. Torture of an Armenian man in a military police department cell". ECHRCaseLaw. 2020-02-03. Retrieved 2021-12-20.
  12. ↑ admin. "CASE OF SARIBEKYAN AND BALYAN v. AZERBAIJAN (European Court of Human Rights) – LawEuro" . Retrieved 2021-12-16.
  13. ↑ Tadevosian, Garnik (30 January 2020). "Azerbaijani judge's 'dissenting opinion' at ECHR on Armenian shepherd's death case". Armenian Directory & News. Retrieved 21 December 2021.
  14. ↑ "ECHR's Judgement Upon Armenian Intelligence Serviceman's Death Prompts Reaction In Baku". caspiannews.com. Retrieved 2021-12-23.
  15. ↑ "The ECHR rejected Azerbaijan's complaint on the case of Manvel Saribekyan". www.1lurer.am. Retrieved 2021-12-23.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.